商品流動性リスクの計量化に関する一考察(その2)―内生的流動性リスクを考慮したストレス・テスト―

Similar documents
() ( ) ( ) (1996) (1997) (1997) EaR (Earning at Risk) VaR ( ) ( ) Memmel (214) () 2 (214) 2

untitled

1990年代以降の日本の経済変動

BIS CDO CDO CDO CDO Cifuentes and O Connor[1] Finger[6] Li[8] Duffie and Garleânu[4] CDO Merton[9] CDO 1 CDO CDO CDS CDO three jump model Longstaff an

Microsoft Word - 査読SP問題110510RR.doc

L Y L( ) Y0.15Y 0.03L 0.01L 6% L=(10.15)Y 108.5Y 6%1 Y y p L ( 19 ) [1990] [1988] 1

CVaR

アジアの資本移動の変化に関するクラスター分析 アジア域内の証券投資活性化に向けて

untitled

IFRS Business Model IASB 2010b, Purpose and status, a and b IASB IFRS IFRS IFRS IASB IFRS IFRS Principles-Based Standard Tweedie 2007 Tweedie 2007, p.

わが国のレポ市場について―理論的整理と実証分析―

2 Recovery Theorem Spears [2013]Audrino et al. [2015]Backwell [2015] Spears [2013] Ross [2015] Audrino et al. [2015] Recovery Theorem Tikhonov (Tikhon

1 CAPM: I-,,, I- ( ) 1 I- I- I- ( CAPM) I- CAPM I- 1 I- Jensen Fama-French 3 I- Fama-French 3 I- Fama-MacBeth I- SMB-FL, HML-FL Fama-MacBeth 1 Fama-Fr

ヒストリカル法によるバリュー・アット・リスクの計測:市場価格変動の非定常性への実務的対応

ii 3.,. 4. F. (), ,,. 8.,. 1. (75%) (25%) =7 20, =7 21 (. ). 1.,, (). 3.,. 1. ().,.,.,.,.,. () (12 )., (), 0. 2., 1., 0,.

国際流動性に関する財政的側面について

バリュー・アット・リスクのリスク指標としての妥当性について ― 理論的サーベイによる期待ショートフォールとの比較分析―

Erased_PDF.pdf

さくらの個別指導 ( さくら教育研究所 ) 1 φ = φ 1 : φ [ ] a [ ] 1 a : b a b b(a + b) b a 2 a 2 = b(a + b). b 2 ( a b ) 2 = a b a/b X 2 X 1 = 0 a/b > 0 2 a

伝統的な経済学では、「消費は重要ではあるが、気にしなくてもよい」と考えられてきた

..3. Ω, Ω F, P Ω, F, P ). ) F a) A, A,..., A i,... F A i F. b) A F A c F c) Ω F. ) A F A P A),. a) 0 P A) b) P Ω) c) [ ] A, A,..., A i,... F i j A i A

2016 (8) Variety Expansion Effects by Feenstra (1994) 1 Variety Effects Dixit and Stiglitz (1977) CES n n? n t U t = ( nt i=1 σ > 1, a it > 0,

ERM 2007/12/26 1

all.dvi

01.Œk’ì/“²fi¡*

untitled

y = x x R = 0. 9, R = σ $ = y x w = x y x x w = x y α ε = + β + x x x y α ε = + β + γ x + x x x x' = / x y' = y/ x y' =

text.dvi

01-._..

24 I ( ) 1. R 3 (i) C : x 2 + y 2 1 = 0 (ii) C : y = ± 1 x 2 ( 1 x 1) (iii) C : x = cos t, y = sin t (0 t 2π) 1.1. γ : [a, b] R n ; t γ(t) = (x

本文/目次(裏白)

: , 2.0, 3.0, 2.0, (%) ( 2.

chap9.dvi

Vol.8 No (July 2015) 2/ [3] stratification / *1 2 J-REIT *2 *1 *2 J-REIT % J-REIT J-REIT 6 J-REIT J-REIT 10 J-REIT *3 J-

CD納品用.indd

会社法制上の資本制度の変容と企業会計上の資本概念について

( )/2 hara/lectures/lectures-j.html 2, {H} {T } S = {H, T } {(H, H), (H, T )} {(H, T ), (T, T )} {(H, H), (T, T )} {1

c y /2 ddy = = 2π sin θ /2 dθd /2 [ ] 2π cos θ d = log 2 + a 2 d = log 2 + a 2 = log 2 + a a 2 d d + 2 = l

, 3, 1999, 4,,

nsg02-13/ky045059301600033210

II III II 1 III ( ) [2] [3] [1] 1 1:

1 Nelson-Siegel Nelson and Siegel(1987) 3 Nelson-Siegel 3 Nelson-Siegel 2 3 Nelson-Siegel 2 Nelson-Siegel Litterman and Scheinkman(199

公的機関が関与した企業再生支援


I


2 1 κ c(t) = (x(t), y(t)) ( ) det(c (t), c x (t)) = det (t) x (t) y (t) y = x (t)y (t) x (t)y (t), (t) c (t) = (x (t)) 2 + (y (t)) 2. c (t) =

I- Fama-French 3, Idiosyncratic (I- ) I- ( ) 1 I- I- I- 1 I- I- Jensen Fama-French 3 SMB-FL, HML-FL I- Fama-French 3 I- Fama-MacBeth Fama-MacBeth I- S

IMES DISCUSSION PAPER SERIES Discussion Paper No. 99-J- 9 -J-19 INSTITUTE FOR MONETARY AND ECONOMIC STUDIES BANK OF JAPAN

Part () () Γ Part ,

meiji_resume_1.PDF

RMBS CDO (ABS ABS CDO IMF , , IMF, Global Financial Stability Report 1) Alt-A 4,250 A

物価変動の決定要因について ― 需給ギャップと物価変動の関係の国際比較を中心に―

4 Mindlin -Reissner 4 δ T T T εσdω= δ ubdω+ δ utd Γ Ω Ω Γ T εσ (1.1) ε σ u b t 3 σ ε. u T T T = = = { σx σ y σ z τxy τ yz τzx} { εx εy εz γ xy γ yz γ

医系の統計入門第 2 版 サンプルページ この本の定価 判型などは, 以下の URL からご覧いただけます. このサンプルページの内容は, 第 2 版 1 刷発行時のものです.

082_rev2_utf8.pdf


数学の基礎訓練I

untitled

福岡大学人文論叢47-3

A = A x x + A y y + A, B = B x x + B y y + B, C = C x x + C y y + C..6 x y A B C = A x x + A y y + A B x B y B C x C y C { B = A x x + A y y + A y B B

( ) 2.1. C. (1) x 4 dx = 1 5 x5 + C 1 (2) x dx = x 2 dx = x 1 + C = 1 2 x + C xdx (3) = x dx = 3 x C (4) (x + 1) 3 dx = (x 3 + 3x 2 + 3x +

自由集会時系列part2web.key

1. (8) (1) (x + y) + (x + y) = 0 () (x + y ) 5xy = 0 (3) (x y + 3y 3 ) (x 3 + xy ) = 0 (4) x tan y x y + x = 0 (5) x = y + x + y (6) = x + y 1 x y 3 (

Z: Q: R: C: sin 6 5 ζ a, b

COE-RES Discussion Paper Series Center of Excellence Project The Normative Evaluation and Social Choice of Contemporary Economic Systems Graduate Scho

長岡慎介  45‐78/45‐78

中国引き締め策の対外的影響

,255 7, ,355 4,452 3,420 3,736 8,206 4, , ,992 6, ,646 4,

() x + y + y + x dy dx = 0 () dy + xy = x dx y + x y ( 5) ( s55906) 0.7. (). 5 (). ( 6) ( s6590) 0.8 m n. 0.9 n n A. ( 6) ( s6590) f A (λ) = det(a λi)

研究シリーズ第40号

学習内容と日常生活との関連性の研究-第2部-第6章

9 5 ( α+ ) = (α + ) α (log ) = α d = α C d = log + C C 5. () d = 4 d = C = C = 3 + C 3 () d = d = C = C = 3 + C 3 =

fiúŁÄ”s‘ê‡ÌŁª”U…−…X…N…v…„…~…A…•‡Ì ”s‘ê™´›ß…−…^†[…fiŠ‚ª›Âfl’«

³ÎΨÏÀ

D = [a, b] [c, d] D ij P ij (ξ ij, η ij ) f S(f,, {P ij }) S(f,, {P ij }) = = k m i=1 j=1 m n f(ξ ij, η ij )(x i x i 1 )(y j y j 1 ) = i=1 j

ii 3.,. 4. F. ( ), ,,. 8.,. 1. (75% ) (25% ) =7 24, =7 25, =7 26 (. ). 1.,, ( ). 3.,...,.,.,.,.,. ( ) (1 2 )., ( ), 0., 1., 0,.

2 4 8 UFJ UFJ 3 CS 32 IT ALM UFJ 117 UFJ 153 UFJ

野村資本市場研究所|SWF:行動規範の策定と最近の動向(PDF)


130 Oct Radial Basis Function RBF Efficient Market Hypothesis Fama ) 4) 1 Fig. 1 Utility function. 2 Fig. 2 Value function. (1) (2)

76 1 2

chap10.dvi

1 (1997) (1997) 1974:Q3 1994:Q3 (i) (ii) ( ) ( ) 1 (iii) ( ( 1999 ) ( ) ( ) 1 ( ) ( 1995,pp ) 1


.5 z = a + b + c n.6 = a sin t y = b cos t dy d a e e b e + e c e e e + e 3 s36 3 a + y = a, b > b 3 s363.7 y = + 3 y = + 3 s364.8 cos a 3 s365.9 y =,

TOP URL 1

1 12 ( )150 ( ( ) ) x M x 0 1 M 2 5x 2 + 4x + 3 x 2 1 M x M 2 1 M x (x + 1) 2 (1) x 2 + x + 1 M (2) 1 3 M (3) x 4 +

n (1.6) i j=1 1 n a ij x j = b i (1.7) (1.7) (1.4) (1.5) (1.4) (1.7) u, v, w ε x, ε y, ε x, γ yz, γ zx, γ xy (1.8) ε x = u x ε y = v y ε z = w z γ yz

Autumn II III Zon and Muysken 2005 Zon and Muysken 2005 IV II 障害者への所得移転の経済効果 分析に用いるデータ

JORSJ05-61_2_pdf.dvi

a n a n ( ) (1) a m a n = a m+n (2) (a m ) n = a mn (3) (ab) n = a n b n (4) a m a n = a m n ( m > n ) m n 4 ( ) 552

1 1 1 [2000]

Management Of Technology 1

6 2 2 x y x y t P P = P t P = I P P P ( ) ( ) ,, ( ) ( ) cos θ sin θ cos θ sin θ, sin θ cos θ sin θ cos θ y x θ x θ P

3章西脇 indd

UFJ

金融コングロマリットと範囲の経済:収益面の分析( )

商学 59‐5・6/2.丸茂

カルマンフィルターによるベータ推定( )

Transcription:

E-mail: shigeru_yoshifuji@btm.co.jp E-mail: fuminobu_otake@btm.co.jp

Bangia et al. G Bangia et al. exogenous liquidity risk endogenous liquidity risk et al

LTCMLong Term Capital Management Fed G G T RTSI LTCM i.i.d.independently and identically distributed T

t =1 t =5 iid T VaR tt i.i.d.

n λ (= np) t =7 f (x ; n, p)= n C x p x q n x n p 0np λ f f (x ; λ)= λ x e λ /x!

Bangia et al.finger Bangia et al. λ Bangia et al. λ (κ) LadjVaR (99%)= P t (1 e 2.33λσ t). LadjVaR (99%)VaR P t σ t κ λ =1+ φ 1 ln + φ 2 l, 3 1 > 0.5 l = 0 0.5. κ φ 1, φ 2

2.33λσ

Q k P k Q k ( c k ) C t C = S Σ S t Σ = A V A, S ij, 1/ = Σ i = j ij 0, A 1 θ k + θ k/( p k + q k) 1 z( i) z( j) ( 1) θk /( pk + qk) 0 ij = + 1 z ( i) = 0 i Q k. i = j, i P i = j, i P i j, i P, k k k Q k Qk Q, j P k k Q k P k Q k P k Q k

n p k P k q k Q k θ 0 0 θ 0 1 θ k kθ k θ 0 θ k = c k θ 0 c k 0 < c k 1 V n n Σ n n C n n Cosandey Cosandey N A P N A NP=Α/N P = Α/(N+ N) A θ 0 c k

A P = N A A P = N + N Cosandey N N N P P 0, P 1, P 2,, P n N 0, N 1, N 2,, N n P t t 0 Nt 1 P 1 P' 1 P t /P t VaR P t 0 P0 N 0 P P t 1 1 t 2 2 N 1 P P N N 2 P N 1 2 VaR t n P P n N n n P t VaR

P = P + P = 1 0 0 P N = P ( N P ) Pmarket ( N0P0 ) ( N P )( N + N ) 2 0 0 0 0 0 N + N P 0 0 0 + N market N., P market N N P 0 0 A N m ( N) m CRTXBUXWIG20IBOV MEXBOLSTIKOSPI2HISG7225 TOPIXS&P500DAXSMI NVaRVaRm ( N)

m ( N) = Nλ λ =m( N) λ. λ VaR( N) m ( N) VaR VaR T ABCD VaR A AB

VaR VaR VaR

VaR 10 iid T B Basel Committee on Banking Supervision BIS Committee on the Global Financial System BIS

VaR

VaR VaRVaR

VaRVaR

iid T Bangia et al. Finger Cosandey JGB

n p=0.5q=0.5 n.i.d.normally and independently distributed i.i.d.independently and identically distributed WNwhite noise {Y n, n = 0,1, }{Z n, n = 0,1, } E[ Y n ] < E [ Y n+1 Z 0,,Z n ]=Y n, n{y n, n = 0,1, }{Z n, n = 0,1, } Z n n n +1 E [Y n+1 Z 0,,Z n ]n Y n E (ε t )=0var (ε t )=σ 2 cov(ε t, ε s )=E (ε t ε s )=0, t s

ε t ~NID (0,σ 2 ), ε t ~iid (0,σ 2 ), ε t ~WN (0,σ 2 ), E (ε t )=0, E (ε t )=0, cov (ε t,ε s )=0, t s, cov (ε t2, ε s2 ) 0, s t.

H 0 H< 0.5 0.5 < H 1 StepN =5 t =1RS R = Max(X t,n ) Min(X t,n ), X t,n = Σ t (e u M N ). u=1 X t,n N e u u M N Nu= 1t StepR / S StepStepStepN=5, 6, 7, StepN log (N ) log (R / S) H H=0.647 VaR Finger

R AVGt 1 R AVGt = R it. p i P i=1, 2,,n t =1, 2,,T R it ti P p : P R it R AVGt θ R it (1 θ ) Rit+ θr = Rit AVGt i P. θ0 θ 1

R i, i Pθ = 0 θθ = 1 θp R i, i P 0 <θ < 1VaR t R t ={R 1t,R 2t, R 3t, R nt } tra R t A R = A R, t 1 θ + θ / p 1 A ij = θ / p 0 t i = j, i P i = j, i P i j, i P, j P. R i R i ΣC V t C = S Σ S t Σ = A V A, S ij, 1/ = Σ i = j ij 0. θ R 2 R 1 R 2 R 2 R 1 R 2 R 2 R 2

' ' α α' α' π α α' ' ' π α ' λ R AVGt 1 = ( R ), 2 1t R 2t R 1t = ( 1 λ ) R +, 1t λ RAVGt R 2t = ( 1 λ ) R. 2t λ RAVGt λ0 λ 1 λ =0 λ λ=1 P k Q k c k

N VaRVaRm ( N) = N

Bangia, Anil, Francis X. Diebold, Til Schuermann and John D.Stroughair, Modeling Liquidity Risk: With Implications for Traditional Market Risk Measurement and Management, working paper, Wharton Financial Institutions Center, 1998. Bank for International Settlements, Stress Testing by Large Financial Institutions: Current Practice and Aggregation Issues, 2000. Basel Committee on Banking Supervision, Performance of Models-Based Capital Charges for Market Risk : 1 July-31 December 1998, September, 1999. Cosandey, David, Adjusting value-at-risk for market liquidity, Risk, October, 2001, pp.115-118. Finger, Christopher C., A Methodology to Stress Correlation, Risk Metrics Monitor, Fourth Quarter,1997, pp. 3-11. Kahneman, D., and Riepe, M., Aspects of Investment Psychology, Journal of Portfolio Management, 24, 1998, pp. 52-65.

Tversky, Amos, The Psychology of Risk - in Quantifying the Market Risk Premium Phenomena for Investment Decision Making -, Institute of Chartered Financial Analysts, 1990.