I- Fama-French 3, Idiosyncratic (I- ) I- ( ) 1 I- I- I- 1 I- I- Jensen Fama-French 3 SMB-FL, HML-FL I- Fama-French 3 I- Fama-MacBeth Fama-MacBeth I- S

Similar documents
1 CAPM: I-,,, I- ( ) 1 I- I- I- ( CAPM) I- CAPM I- 1 I- Jensen Fama-French 3 I- Fama-French 3 I- Fama-MacBeth I- SMB-FL, HML-FL Fama-MacBeth 1 Fama-Fr

2 I- I- (1) 2 I- (2) 2 I- 1 [18] I- I-. 1 I- I- Jensen [11] I- FF 3 I- FF CAPM n ( i = 1,..., n) M t R i,t, i = 1,..., n R M,t ( ) R i,t = r i

カルマンフィルターによるベータ推定( )

日本株式市場における経済レジームファクターの役割

L Y L( ) Y0.15Y 0.03L 0.01L 6% L=(10.15)Y 108.5Y 6%1 Y y p L ( 19 ) [1990] [1988] 1

CVaR

untitled

autocorrelataion cross-autocorrelataion Lo/MacKinlay [1988, 1990] (A)

36巻目次.indd

Vol.8 No (July 2015) 2/ [3] stratification / *1 2 J-REIT *2 *1 *2 J-REIT % J-REIT J-REIT 6 J-REIT J-REIT 10 J-REIT *3 J-

23_02.dvi

textream ( )

fiúŁÄ”s‘ê‡ÌŁª”U…−…X…N…v…„…~…A…•‡Ì ”s‘ê™´›ß…−…^†[…fiŠ‚ª›Âfl’«

untitled

24 [11] [4, 8, 10, 20, 21] CreditMetrics [8] CreditMetrics CreditMetrics CreditMetrics [13] [1, 12, 16, 17] [12] [1] Conditional Value-at-Risk C

130 Oct Radial Basis Function RBF Efficient Market Hypothesis Fama ) 4) 1 Fig. 1 Utility function. 2 Fig. 2 Value function. (1) (2)

バリュー・アット・リスクのリスク指標としての妥当性について ― 理論的サーベイによる期待ショートフォールとの比較分析―


プログラム

人工知能学会研究会資料 SIG-FPAI-B Predicting stock returns based on the time lag in information diffusion through supply chain networks 1 1 Yukinobu HA

01-._..

_0212_68<5A66><4EBA><79D1>_<6821><4E86><FF08><30C8><30F3><30DC><306A><3057><FF09>.pdf

わが国企業による資金調達方法の選択問題

03.Œk’ì

untitled

Auerbach and Kotlikoff(1987) (1987) (1988) 4 (2004) 5 Diamond(1965) Auerbach and Kotlikoff(1987) 1 ( ) ,

橡計画0.PDF


株式保有構成と企業価値 ─コーポレート・ガバナンスに関する一考察─


, 3, 1999, 4,,

[8] Google Earth/Google Maps [7], [8] / 1 [7], [8] 2 [7], [8] [7] [8] [7] [8] [7] 2 ( ) = ( k ) ( k ) k (1) Lancaster [9] Rosen [13] hedo

わが国企業による株主還元策の決定要因:配当・自社株消却のインセンティブを巡る実証分析

082_rev2_utf8.pdf

Vol. 4 No (Mar. 2011) of location. We then measure the risk in real estate prices which are caused by it. Moreover, we apply our model t

Amihud の IML ファクターを いた本邦株式市場における流動性リスクプレミアムの実証分析及び貸借銘柄選定による流動性への影響の検証 - 流動性と企業価値の関係の考察に向けて - 橋 学 学院国際企業戦略研究科 融戦略 経営財務コース飯塚賢

y = x x R = 0. 9, R = σ $ = y x w = x y x x w = x y α ε = + β + x x x y α ε = + β + γ x + x x x x' = / x y' = y/ x y' =

COE-RES Discussion Paper Series Center of Excellence Project The Normative Evaluation and Social Choice of Contemporary Economic Systems Graduate Scho

2 1,2, , 2 ( ) (1) (2) (3) (4) Cameron and Trivedi(1998) , (1987) (1982) Agresti(2003)

aragciv54mac.dvi

わが国のレポ市場について―理論的整理と実証分析―

73,, $Jensen[1968]$, CAPM, Ippolito[19891,,, $Carhart[1997]$, ,, 12 10, 4,,,, 10%, 4,,,, ( ) $Carhart[1997]$ 4,,,,, Kosowski,$Timmennan\iota_

Vol. 3 No (Mar. 2010) An Option Valuation Model Based on an Asset Pricing Model Incorporating Investors Beliefs Kentaro Tanaka, 1 Koich

1990年代以降の日本の経済変動

untitled

Isogai, T., Building a dynamic correlation network for fat-tailed financial asset returns, Applied Network Science (7):-24, 206,

seminar0220a.dvi

Multivariate Realized Stochastic Volatility Models with Dynamic Correlation and Skew Distribution: Bayesian Analysis and Application to Risk Managemen

46−ª3�=4�“ƒ‚S“·‚Ö‡¦

信用リスク移転機能の発展と最適ローンポートフォリオ選択

日経225オプションデータを使ったGARCHオプション価格付けモデルの検証

p *2 DSGEDynamic Stochastic General Equilibrium New Keynesian *2 2

[2], [3] Bremer [3] Fortune % Overreaction hypothesis Benou [2] 1 20% [9] 1 [10] 1 [1], [4], [5], [6], [7], [8] [1] [8] [6] [2], [3] stylized f

日本内科学会雑誌第102巻第4号

1 Nelson-Siegel Nelson and Siegel(1987) 3 Nelson-Siegel 3 Nelson-Siegel 2 3 Nelson-Siegel 2 Nelson-Siegel Litterman and Scheinkman(199

2 Recovery Theorem Spears [2013]Audrino et al. [2015]Backwell [2015] Spears [2013] Ross [2015] Audrino et al. [2015] Recovery Theorem Tikhonov (Tikhon

01.Œk’ì/“²fi¡*

坪沼

戦間期日本企業の資金調達、資本コスト、資本構成:最適資本構成理論からみた1930年代における企業財務

Microsoft Word - Šv”|.DOC

上場変更と株価:株主分散と流動性変化のインパクト

M&A の経済分析:M&A はなぜ増加したのか

(2004 ) 2 (A) (B) (C) 3 (1987) (1988) Shimono and Tachibanaki(1985) (2008) , % 2 (1999) (2005) 3 (2005) (2006) (2008)

Erased_PDF.pdf

マクロ経済スライド下における積立金運用でのリスク

LA-VAR Toda- Yamamoto(1995) VAR (Lag Augmented vector autoregressive model LA-VAR ) 2 2 Nordhaus(1975) 3 1 (D2)

shuron.dvi

商品流動性リスクの計量化に関する一考察(その2)―内生的流動性リスクを考慮したストレス・テスト―

本組/根間弘海

財政赤字の経済分析:中長期的視点からの考察

PFI

[17]Holmström and Tirole (2000) (1) (2) (1) (2) 1 1 2


BIS CDO CDO CDO CDO Cifuentes and O Connor[1] Finger[6] Li[8] Duffie and Garleânu[4] CDO Merton[9] CDO 1 CDO CDO CDS CDO three jump model Longstaff an

リスクとリターンの実証分析―行動ファイナンスによるアプローチ― 新関 三希代

プリント

非上場企業におけるコーポレート・ガバナンス

5 1F2F 21 1F2F



Jorgenson F, L : L: Inada lim F =, lim F L = k L lim F =, lim F L = 2 L F >, F L > 3 F <, F LL < 4 λ >, λf, L = F λ, λl 5 Y = Const a L a < α < CES? C


論文08.indd

60 Vol. 44 No. 1 2 準市場 化の制度的枠組み: 英国 教育改革法 1988 の例 Education Reform Act a School Performance Tables LEA 4 LEA LEA 3

ntv AR05 new/J


Y-...W

untitled

スプレッド・オプション評価公式を用いた裁定取引の可能性―電力市場のケース― 藤原 浩一,新関 三希代

<8DEC90AC97702E657073>

本文/目次(裏白)

1 Jensen et al.[6] GRT S&P500 GRT RT GRT Kiriu and Hibiki[8] Jensen et al.[6] GRT 3 GRT Generalized Recovery Theorem (Jensen et al.[6])

濱田弘潤 : 多角化企業の利潤分析 77 多角化企業の利潤分析 多角化ディスカウントの寡占理論による説明 * 濱田弘潤 (diversification discount) Keywords: JEL classifications: D43, L13, L22, G

IPSJ SIG Technical Report Vol.2011-MPS-85 No /9/ : Time Series Modeling of Real Estate Prices and Its Application Hiroshi Ishijima, 1 A

研究シリーズ第40号

金融政策の波及経路と政策手段

投資家の株式需要関数におけるボラティリティの限界効果と構造変化

取引銀行の破綻が企業経営に及ぼす影響について-阪和銀行破綻の事例分析-

Ł\”ƒ1PDFŠp

_03.indd

Transcription:

I- Fama-French 3, Idiosyncratic (I- ) I- ( ) 1 I- I- I- 1 I- I- Jensen Fama-French 3 SMB-FL, HML-FL I- Fama-French 3 I- Fama-MacBeth Fama-MacBeth I- SMB-FL, HML-FL Fama-MacBeth 2, 3, 5 I- HML-FL 1 Fama-French (FF) 3 [7] (Capital Asset Pricing Model; CAPM [15, 18]) CAPM, Email: yuji@gssm.otsuka.tsukuba.ac.jp, Email: takaaki.yoshino@daiwa.co.jp, Email: tetsuro.saito@daiwa.co.jp 1

( [2, 14, 17, 19]) [20, 21] Idiosyncratic (I- ) I- FF 3 [3, 4, 10] [6, 11] 1 2 3 1 [10] [20] I- I- 1 I- (1 ) 2 2 I- 2 2 3 3 I- I- I- (1) 2 I- (2) 2 I- 1, (3) I- I- [21] I- I- 1 I- 7 I- FF 3 SMB, HML (SMB-FL, HML-FL) I- SMB-FL, HML-FL Fama-MacBeth [8, 9] I- 2

2 2.1 CAPM n ( i = 1,..., n) M t R, i = 1,..., n R M,t ( ) R = r r f, R M,t = r M,t r f (2.1) R = r r i, R M,t = r M,t r M (2.2) 1. r i r f r i := E [r ], r M := E [r M,t ] i k C (k) 2 ] C (k) [R := Cov, RM,t k (2.3) (2.1) 1 CAPM [15, 18] r i r f = κ (1) ( r M r f ), κ (1) := C (1) Var [R M,t ] (2.4) [10] (2.4) r i r f 1 3. [10] κ (k) := C (k) k = 1, 2,..., (2.5) E [{R M,t E [R M,t ]} k+1], κ (2) i κ(3) [6, 11] ( ) 1 t = 1, 2,..., T r, r M,t ( i.i.d.) X, Y X = E [X] Var [X] Cov[X, Y ] X m X R m X. 2 r f 1 2. 3 [13] 3 CAPM. 1. 3

2.2 I- [20, 21] I- I- 1 (I- ) β (k) k I-. [ ] ε (0) β (k) := Cov ε (k 1) Var, RM,t k ], k = 1, 2, 3,... (2.6) [ R k M,t := R ε (k), k 1 ε (k) := ε (k 1) β (k) Rk M,t, k = 1, 2, 3,... (2.7) I- β (1) β(1) = κ (1) β(1) R M,t R M,t ε (0) := R ε (1) = R β (1) R M,t ε (1) β (1) R M,t 4. ε (1) 1 β (2) R2 M,t R2 M,t ε (2) RM,t k β(2) R2 M,t 1 ε(2) = ε (1) β(2) ε(k) ε(k 1) R2 M,t k k I- β(k) (2.6), (2.7) I- 1 R k I- k [20, 21] R = β (1) R M,t + β (2) R2 M,t + + β (k 1) Rk 1 M,t + β(k) Rk M,t + ε (k) (2.8) [ ] Cov ε (j), Rj M,t = 0, j = 1,..., k (2.8) (2.3) ] [ ] ] C (k) = β(1) [R Cov M,t, RM,t k + + β (k 1) Cov R k 1 M,t, Rk M,t + β (k) [R Var M,t k (2.9) (2.9) I- I- 2.3 I- [20, 21] I- 1 2 I- 0 β (k) = 0, k 2 (2.10) 4 2 X, Y X Y E [XY ] = 0. 4

1 2 I- [20, 21] w i > 0, n wi = 1 i=1 I- k 5 2 2 I- k (k = 1, 2,...) n i=1 n i=1 w i β (k) = 0 (k 2) (2.11) w i ε (k) = 0 (k 1) (2.12) n i=1 w i β (1) = 1 (2.13) I- I- 2 2 I- 0 I- [20, 21] R, R M,t I- 1 I- I- 6. [21] I- 10 I- 1 I- 2 I- 3 I-. 5% ( ) 2 50%, 3 65% 5 w i > 0.. 6 I- R M,t. 5

4 I- 25% 5 % 3 I- 2 I- 2 I- 3 I- B/P B/P 2 I- 3 I- 3 I- B/P I- [21] I- I- I- Fama-French 3 [7] I- Fama-French 3 3 3.1 I- ᾱ i := r i r f β (1) ( r M,t r f ) (3.1) I- 7. ᾱ i c 2 β (2) + + c m 1β (m 1) + c m β (m) (3.2) m I- α := r r f β (1) (r M,t r f ) (3.3) 7 2 I- (= β (1) ), (3.1) (3.1) Jensen [12]. 6

CAPM α (= E [α ]) (2.1) R, R M,t α = ε (1) (3.2) A [16] CAPM I- I- (A.13) I- 3 I- ( ) 4 3 I- I- (A.13) I- ᾱ ( α ) 2 m I- 3.2 SMB HML FF 3 FF 3 SMB (Small Minus Big), HML (High Minus Low) 8,. 1. ( 1 ) 8 (Small) (Big) (B/P) 30% 70% B/P (Low), (Middle), (High) 2. Step 1 Small Low Small/Low Small Middle Small/Middle Small/Low, Small/Middle, Small/High, Big/Low, Big/Middle, Big/High 6 3. (a) (b) SMB (a) Small/Low, Small/Middle, Small/High 1/3 8 SMB/HML FF 3 [7] [14]. 7

(b) Big/Low, Big/Middle, Big/High 1/3 4. (a) (b) HML (a) Small/High, Big/High 1/2 (b) Small/Low, Big/Low 1/2 I- FF 3 (3.3) α α d 1 SMB t + d 2 HML t (3.4) SMB t HML t t SMB, HML (3.4) FF 3 r r f β 1 (r M,t r f ) + β 2 SMB t + β 3 HML t β 1 CAPM ( 1 I- β (1) ) (3.4) CAPM ( α ) SMB, HML (Factor Loading; FL) d 1, d 2 0 CAPM SMB, HML d 1, d 2 SMB, HML d 1, d 2 SMB, HML I- FF 3 SMB, HML (SMB-FL, HML-FL) SMB-FL, HML-FL (= β (1) ) α SMB, HML (3.4) i SMB, HML SMB-FL i = d 1, HML-FL i = d 2 SMB-FL i, HML-FL i ᾱ i c s SMB-FL i + c h HML-FL i (3.5) ᾱ i c 2 β (2) + + c m 1β (m 1) + c m β (m) + c ssmb-fl i + c h HML-FL i (3.6) I- (3.2) 8

3.3 1 9 NEEDS-FinancialQUEST 1978 10 3 2013 3 29 10 2013 3 29 10 1,121 R R M,t (2.1) 11. I- i R M,t β (1) (1 ) SMB-FL, HML-FL R 2 M,t β(2) 1 α (3.4) i SMB-FL i, HML-FL i k = 1 k = 2 k = 3 k = 4 k = 5 k = 6 k = 7 0.839 0.582 11.083 17.582 49.929 209.227 2244.184 0.235 1.098 13.398 61.850 239.618 1535.606 7159.634 t 40.666 1.075 2.104 0.415 0.097 0.106 0.084 t 13.503 2.087 2.476 1.385 0.645 0.567 0.327 (%) 100.000 9.991 59.054 19.893 1.517 0.268 0.089 (%) 0.000 40.856 6.601 6.334 0.089 0.268 0.000 Table 3.1: β (k). 5% t. Table 3.1 1,121 I- 7 Table 3.1 1 β (i), i = 1,..., 7 t 2 0 t 5% ( ) 2 I- 3 I- ( ) 2 50%, 3 65% 4 9 33 4. 10 http://www.nikkei.co.jp/needs/services/fq.html., 1978 10 2. 8861. 11. (2.2) (2.1). 9

25% 5 % 12. I- SMB-FL HML-FL Table 3.2 Table 3.1 I- SMB-FL, HML-FL, Panel A 7 I- Panel B SMB-FL, HML-FL Panel C t p Panel A C, F F p Panel A I- 2 I- 10% 3 4, 6 7 I- 1% I- 5 I- 5 I- VIF 7.06 VIF (A.13) I- 3 7 5 Panel A: I- : 0.107, F : 23.441, p : 0.0001 2 3 4 5 6 7 SMB-FL HML-FL 1.35e-05 1.90e-06 1.53e-06 1.05e-08 3.21e-08 7.02e-09 1.50e-04 t 1.418 2.436 4.884 0.146 2.410 3.179 14.337 p 0.078 0.007 <.0001 0.442 0.008 0.001 <.0001 Panel B: SMB-FL, HML-FL : 0.191, F : 133.624, p : 0.0001 2.68e-04 4.81e-06 2.51e-04 t 14.858 0.098 15.280 p <.0001 0.461 <.0001 Panel C: I- + SMB-FL, HML-FL : 0.211, F : 38.440, p : 0.0001 5.83e-06 1.36e-07 5.06e-07 1.81e-07 1.75e-08 1.43e-09 2.60e-04 1.85e-05 2.46e-04 t 0.692 0.185 1.574 2.666 1.377 0.643 10.873 0.383 14.758 p 0.245 0.427 0.058 0.004 0.084 0.260 <.0001 0.351 <.0001 Table 3.2:. I-. SMB-FL, HML-FL I- 5 I- 5 I- 1% I- 3 7 I- I- 0 SMB-FL HML-FL 12 5 I- 7 I-. 10

I- Table 3.3 I- 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 SMB-FL HML-FL 1 1.000 0.147 0.209 0.265 0.198 0.242 0.173 0.070 0.054 2 0.138 1.000 0.022 0.015 0.106 0.034 0.006 0.263 0.127 3 0.238 0.023 1.000 0.041 0.317 0.151 0.174 0.217 0.131 4 0.268 0.012 0.079 1.000 0.351 0.874 0.128 0.431 0.067 5 0.207 0.104 0.406 0.378 1.000 0.405 0.851 0.029 0.119 6 0.239 0.002 0.210 0.881 0.481 1.000 0.199 0.289 0.073 7 0.181 0.006 0.268 0.202 0.881 0.344 1.000 0.233 0.092 SMB-FL 0.040 0.232 0.237 0.434 0.035 0.269 0.217 1.000 0.023 HML-FL 0.107 0.136 0.233 0.047 0.135 0.063 0.112 0.059 1.000 Table 3.3:. SMB-FL, HML-FL HML-FL SMB-FL SMB-FL, HML-FL (3.4) SMB-FL, HML-FL 13 Fig. 3.1 SMB- FL, HML-FL 5% / SMB-FL, HML-FL All Table 3.2 1 4 4 4 1: 1978/10/03-1986/07/08, 2: 1986/07/09-1995/03/23 3: 1995/03/24-2004/03/18, 4: 2004/03/19-2013/03/29 4 14. SMB-FL 90% HML-FL 85% (3.3) α (= ) SMB, HML SMB-FL HML-FL HML (= ᾱ i ) 13 (3.4) SMB t HML t. 14 1 855, 1034, 1106, 1447. 11

0.000% プラス有意比率 マイナス有意比率 プラス有意比率 マイナス有意比率 100.000% 90.000% 90.000% 80.000% 80.000% 70.000% 70.000% 60.000% 60.000% 50.000% 50.000% 40.000% 40.000% 30.000% 30.000% 20.000% 20.000% 10.000% 10.000% 0.000% 1 2 3 4 ALL 1 2 3 4 ALL SMB-FL HML-FL Fig. 3.1: 4 1 4 (All) SMB-FL( ), HML- FL( ) 3.4 (B/P) B/P ( ) 5 ( 1 5 ) Table 3.4 ( 1 ) ( 5 ) 2 Panel A I- 1 I- 5 5 I- 1 SMB-FL, HML-FL 1 SMB-FL 1% HML-FL 10% 5 F 5 Panel C SMB-FL, HML-FL Panel A I- 1 Panel C SMB-FL, HML-FL I- 4 I- 10% 6 I- 1% Panel A, Panel B Table 3.5 B/P B/P ( 1 ) 12

1 Panel A: I- : 0.0824, F : 4.339, p : 0.001 2 3 4 5 6 7 SMB FL HML FL 3.25e-05 6.80e-07 2.64e-06 1.43e-07 1.03e-07 7.66e-09 1.28e-05 t 1.374 0.342 2.902 0.748 2.760 1.220 0.301 p 0.085 0.366 0.002 0.228 0.003 0.112 0.382 Panel B: SMB FL, HML FL : 0.108, F : 14.531, p : 0.0001 2.94e-04 2.68e-04 9.36e-05 t 5.592 1.517 1.330 p <.0001 0.065 0.093 Panel C: I + SMB FL, HML FL : 0.195, F : 7.759, p : 0.0001 3.59e-06 7.27e-07 1.51e-06 1.78e-08 9.53e-08 3.46e-09 3.74e-04 3.31e-04 1.75e-04 t 0.182 0.395 1.612 0.091 2.768 0.558 4.863 2.024 2.616 p 0.428 0.347 0.054 0.464 0.003 0.289 <.0001 0.022 0.005 5 Panel A: I : 0.180, F : 9.163, p : 0.0001 2 3 4 5 6 7 SMB FL HML FL 5.62e-05 2.77e-06 2.80e-07 1.48e-07 3.77e-08 8.38e-09 2.28e-04 t 3.546 1.653 0.535 1.129 1.560 1.867 13.686 p 0.000 0.050 0.297 0.130 0.060 0.032 <.0001 Panel B: SMB FL, HML FL : 0.0141, F : 2.595, p : 0.077 4.62e-06 1.01e-04 2.34e-04 t 0.088 1.158 9.413 p 0.465 0.124 <.0001 Panel C: I + SMB FL, HML FL : 0.173, F : 6.835, p : 0.0001 5.73e-05 2.67e-06 2.09e-07 1.61e-07 3.96e-08 8.81e-09 2.11e-05 1.13e-06 2.29e-04 t 3.420 1.839 0.413 1.125 1.718 1.781 0.363 0.016 9.922 p 0.000 0.034 0.340 0.131 0.044 0.038 0.358 0.494 <.0001 Table 3.4:. I. ( : 1, : 5 ) 13

( 5 ) Panel C 1 5 5 5 HML-FL 1% 4 6 I- 1% 1 5 7 I- 5% ( p 1% ) 1 5 SMB-FL 2 I- SMB-FL, HML-FL 5 10% B/P 1 Panel A: I : 0.142, F : 7.153, p : 0.0001 2 3 4 5 6 7 SMB FL HML FL 2.32e-07 2.44e-06 1.39e-06 1.73e-07 3.40e-08 5.15e-09 2.23e-04 t 0.009 1.270 1.932 0.855 0.910 0.737 10.577 p 0.496 0.103 0.027 0.197 0.182 0.231 <.0001 Panel B: SMB FL, HML FL : 0.211, F : 30.840, p : 0.0001 2.80e-04 5.17e-05 3.14e-04 t 7.430 0.415 13.914 p <.0001 0.339 <.0001 Panel C: I + SMB FL, HML FL : 0.261, F : 10.831, p : 0.0001 2.65e-05 1.45e-06 2.23e-07 4.93e-07 4.42e-08 1.84e-08 3.03e-04 7.19e-06 3.03e-04 t 1.147 0.790 0.274 2.349 1.212 2.229 4.739 0.058 13.383 p 0.126 0.215 0.392 0.010 0.113 0.013 <.0001 0.477 <.0001 B/P 5 Panel A: I : 0.144, F : 7.265, p : 0.0001 2 3 4 5 6 7 SMB FL HML FL 5.80e-06 2.42e-06 3.26e-06 2.88e-07 1.26e-07 8.88e-09 6.16e-05 t 0.285 1.350 3.586 1.455 3.424 1.633 2.218 p 0.388 0.089 0.000 0.074 0.000 0.052 0.014 Panel B: SMB FL, HML FL : 0.203, F : 29.482, p : 0.0001 4.78e-04 3.15e-04 2.00e-04 t 6.023 2.189 2.753 p <.0001 0.015 0.003 Panel C: I + SMB FL, HML FL : 0.300, F : 12.926, p : 0.0001 2.23e-05 2.12e-06 2.11e-06 1.84e-07 1.12e-07 2.56e-09 4.21e-04 4.08e-04 1.60e-04 t 1.353 1.279 2.628 0.920 3.592 0.479 5.849 2.955 2.250 p 0.089 0.101 0.005 0.179 0.000 0.316 <.0001 0.002 0.013 Table 3.5: B/P. I. ( : 1, : 5 ) 14

3.5 Table 3.6 1 5 B/P 1 B/P 5 I- + 2 SMB-FL, HML-FL SMB-FL, HML-FL Panel C 2 3 4 5 6 7 SMB-FL HML-FL + ( ) ( ) + (+ ) + ( ) 1 + ( ) + (+ ) ( ) + (+ ) 5 ( ) ( ) ( ) + (+ ) B/P 1 ( ) (+ ) ( ) B/P 5 ( ) ( ) + + (+ ) ( ) + (+ ) Table 3.6:. +,,, 1%, 5%, 10%. 3 I- 4 I- 6 7 I- 2 5 I- I- I- 2 5 I- SMB-FL SMB-FL 4 Fama-MacBeth Fama-MacBeth ( ). 15 I- SMB-FL, HML-FL (250 ) 15 Fama-MacBeth [8, 9] [5]. Fama-MacBeth. 15

1 Fama-MacBeth I- 4.1 3.3 (1978 10 3 2013 3 29 ) I- 250 7 I- SMB, HML 8 1 ( ) SMB-FL, HML-FL 250 I- SMB-FL, HML-FL 3.3 1 16 I- SMB-FL, HML-FL 1 I- SMB-FL, HML-FL 1 1,752. Fama-MacBeth [8, 9] t I- 4.2 Table 4.1 Fama-MacBeth Panel A 1 7 I Fama-MacBeth 1 3 t t p 4 7, 5% 5% 10% 10%. 17 Panel B SMB-FL, HML-FL Panel C SMB-FL, HML-FL Panel D 16 t, t+1 s r t+1,..., r t+s s i=1 (1 + rt+i) [14]. 17 1,752. 16

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 SMB-FL HML-FL Panel A: I- ( ): 6.018% ( ) 9.465e-05 4.093e-05 4.325e-05 1.231e-05 1.899e-05 4.895e-06 1.783e-06 7.947e-04 t 0.161 1.524 2.437 0.629 2.439 0.985 1.500 1.833 p 0.436 0.064 0.007 0.265 0.007 0.162 0.067 0.033 5% ( ) 36.701% 21.861% 16.895% 17.751% 16.210% 15.468% 15.696% 39.269% 5% ( ) 40.183% 22.774% 16.667% 15.925% 16.610% 17.009% 16.495% 34.018% 10% ( ) 39.098% 26.598% 21.861% 23.116% 22.032% 22.146% 21.804% 41.724% 10% ( ) 42.580% 29.053% 23.345% 22.489% 22.089% 23.231% 22.603% 36.587% Panel B: I- + SMB-FL, HML-FL ( ): 8.739% ( ) 3.248e-04 4.758e-05 3.133e-05 4.269e-06 1.074e-05 1.570e-06 7.575e-07 9.568e-05 8.467e-04 4.400e-04 t 0.583 2.091 2.296 0.330 1.665 0.475 0.895 0.231 2.668 1.163 p 0.280 0.018 0.011 0.371 0.048 0.317 0.185 0.409 0.004 0.122 5% ( ) 37.386% 15.183% 11.073% 13.756% 11.587% 11.587% 11.416% 32.934% 31.336% 34.703% 5% ( ) 37.614% 17.295% 12.900% 11.815% 11.758% 12.785% 12.671% 36.016% 27.511% 30.879% 10% ( ) 39.897% 20.491% 17.409% 20.662% 18.094% 17.409% 18.779% 36.016% 35.788% 39.384% 10% ( ) 40.868% 22.945% 18.493% 18.607% 17.580% 18.836% 18.037% 39.269% 31.621% 34.589% Panel C: (1 I- ) + SMB-FL, HML-FL ( ): 7.757% ( ) 2.364e-04 3.842e-05 8.568e-04 5.364e-04 t 0.420 0.092 2.645 1.365 p 0.337 0.463 0.004 0.086 5% ( ) 37.900% 36.244% 33.733% 36.358% 5% ( ) 38.642% 38.470% 29.566% 32.078% 10% ( ) 40.068% 39.041% 37.500% 39.612% 10% ( ) 40.639% 41.381% 33.276% 34.989% Panel D: (1 I- ) ( ): 3.786% ( ) 2.390e-04 9.376e-04 t 0.396 1.953 p 0.346 0.026 5% ( ) 37.443% 40.811% 5% ( ) 41.096% 35.445% 10% ( ) 39.783% 43.550% 10% ( ) 43.779% 38.299% Table 4.1: Fama MacBeth. I-. 17

1 I- Panel A Panel D Panel A Panel B Fama-MacBeth [8] 5% 36.7% 40.2% 80% ( ) 2 I- Panel A 2 7 I- 10% 3 5 I- 1% Panel B SMB-FL, HML-FL 2 3 5 I- 5% I- 2 3 I- 5 I- 7 Panel A 5 I- 5 I- 3 I- 2 I- SMB-FL, HML-FL Panel C SMB-FL, HML-FL 3 HML-FL 1% HML-FL [8] B/P 18. HML-FL. (Table 3.2 ) HML-FL Fama-MacBeth SMB-FL [14] I- SMB-FL, HML-FL Fama-MacBeth 18 [8] Fama-MacBeth B/P B/P. B/P HML-FL HML-FL B/P HML-FL [8] B/P. 18

2 I- I- 5 I- 1 I- 7 I- 5 I- FF 3 SMB, HML (SMB-FL, HML-FL) 2 3 I- 5 I- SMB-FL, HML-FL 2 3 I- I- FF 3 FL I- Fama-MacBeth Fama- MacBeth 1 I- I- SMB-FL, HML-FL 2, 3, 5 I- I- HML-FL I- I- [1] P. Artzner, F. Delbaen, J. M. Eber, and D. Heath, Coherent Measures of Risk, Mathematical Finance, 9(3), 203-228, 1999. [2] M.M. Carhart, On persistence in mutual fund performance, Journal of Finance, 52(1), 57 82, 1997. 19

[3] R. Christie-David and M. Chaudhry, Coskewness and cokurtosis in futures markets, Journal of Empirical Finance 8, 55-81, 2001. [4] Y.P. Chung, H. Johnson and M. Schill, Asset pricing when returns are nonnormal: Fama-French factors vs. higher-order systematic comoments, Journal of Business, 79(2), 923 940, 2006. [5] J.H. Cochrane, Asset Pricing, Revised Edition, Princeton University Press, 2005. [6] R.F. Dittmar, Nonlinear pricing kernels, kurtosis preference, and evidence from the cross-section of equity returns, Journal of Finance 51, 369 403, 2002. [7] E.F. Fama and K.R. French, Common risk factors in the returns on stocks and bonds, Journal of Financial Economics, 33(1), 3 56, 1993. [8] E.F. Fama and K.R. French, The cross-section of expected stock returns, Journal of Finance, 47(2), 427 465, 1992. [9] E.F. Fama and J.D. MacBeth, Risk, Return, and Equilibrium: Empirical Tests, The Journal of Political Economy, 81(3), 607 636, 1973. [10] H. Fang and T.-Y. Lai, Co-kurtosis and capital asset pricing, Financial Review 32, 293 307, 1997. [11] C. Harvey and A. Siddique, Conditional skewness in asset pricing tests, Journal of Finance 55, 1263 1295, 2000. [12] M.C. Jensen, The Performance of Mutual Funds in the Period 1945-1964, Journal of Finance 23, 389 416, 1968. [13] A. Kraus and R. Litzenberger, Skewness preference and the valuation of risk assets, Journal of Finance 31, 1085 1100, 1976. [14],, Fama-French,, 22, 3 23, 2007. [15] J. Lintner, The valuation of risk assets and the selection of risky investments in stock portfolios and capital budgets, Review of Economics and Statistics, 13 37, 1965. [16] Y. Malevergne and D. Sornette, Extreme Financial Risks: From Dependence to Risk Management, Springer, 2006. [17] L. Pastor and R.F. Stambaugh, Liquidity risk and expected stock returns, Journal of Political Economy, 111(3), 642 685, 2003. 20

[18] W. Sharpe, Capital asset prices: a theory of market equilibrium under conditions of risk, Journal of Finance 19, 425 442, 1964. [19],,, UFJ, 407 430, 2008. [20],,, Idiosyncratic, 2011 JAFEE, 49 60, 2011. [21],,,, JAFEE 12, pp. 168 19, 2013. [22],, VaR, / /2001.12, 95 131, 2001. A (Generalized Capital Asset Pricing) [16] I- [16] CAPM ρ r i r f = ρ ( w r ) r M r f, i = 1, 2,..., n (A.1) w i ρ (r w =w M,t ) w i, i = 1, 2,..., n 1 w R n i r R n i r, i = 1,..., n w R n [16] ρ i (i = 1, 2,...) 1 1 X, Y, c, ρ 19. 1) 1 (Positive homogeneity): ρ (λx) = λρ (X) 0, λ > 0 2) (Convexity): ρ (λx + (1 λ) Y ) λρ (X) + (1 λ) ρ (Y ), λ [0, 1] 3) (Translation invariance): ρ (X + c) = ρ (X), ρ (0) = 0 19 1 3, [1] (Monotonicity; X Y ρ(x) ρ(y )) [22]. 21

( [ (X ]) 2 1/2 ρ ρ (X) := E X) 1 ρ ( w r ) 1 w i ρ (r w =w M,t ) ( ) ( [ { ]) 2 1/2 ( [ 1/2 ρ w r = E w (r r)} = Var w r]) (A.2) = = = 1 2ρ (w r) w =w 1 [ 2ρ 2 (r M,t ) E 2 1 [ { } ] 2 E w (r r) w i } { w (r r) ρ 2 (r M,t ) E [(r M,t r M,t ) (r r i )] = Cov [r M,t, r ] Var [r M,t ] ] w (r r i ) =w w =w 1 ρ (r M,t ) (A.3) (A.3) (A.1) CAPM ρ ρ (X) := j 1 η j X X j, η j > 0 (A.4) j j X X l := ( [ E X l]) 1/l, l = 1, 2,..., (A.5) ρ 1 η 1 = 1, η j = 0 (j 2) (A.4) η 2 = 1, η j = 0 (j 2) (A.4) ρ R, R M,t (2.2) ρ ρ ( ) ρ w w r := η j (r r), j η j > 0 (A.6) {j=2,4,..., ˆm} ˆm w (r r) [ j {w j E (r r) } ] j w i = w i w =w [ w =w { j 1 = E j w (r r)} (r r i )] [ ] w =w = je R j 1 M,t R, j = 2, 4,..., ˆm w (r r) j j w i = j R M,t j 1 j w =w w (r r) j w i w =w 22

κ (j 1) = C(j 1) [ E R j M,t ] = C(j 1) R M,t j j, j = 2, 4,..., ˆm R, R M,t (2.2) w (r r) [ ] j E R j 1 M,t R = w i w =w R M,t j 1 j ( ) Cov R j 1 M,t, R = R M,t j 1 j C (j 1) = R M,t j 1 j = R M,t j κ (j 1) r i r f = ρ ( w r ) r M r f w i ρ (r w =w M,t ) = w (r r) j η j w i {j=2,4,..., ˆm} w =w = ( r M r f ) ω j κ (j 1) {j=2,4,..., ˆm} r M r f {j=2,4,..., ˆm} η j R M,t j (A.7) (A.8) (A.9) ω l, l = 2, 4,..., ˆm ω l := η l R M,t l {j=2,4,..., ˆm} η j R M,t j, l = 2, 4,..., ˆm (A.10) η l > 0 ω l > 0 (2.9) κ (j 1) = C(j 1) [ E R j M,t ω 2 + ω 4 + + ω ˆm = 1 j 1 ] = l=1 [ ] E R j 1+l ϕ (j) M,t l := [ ], l = 1,..., j 1 E R j M,t ϕ (j) l β (l), j = 2, 4,..., ˆm (A.11) 23

(A.9) r i r f = ( r M r f ) = ( r M r f ) {j=2,4,..., ˆm} {j=2,4,..., ˆm} ω j κ (j 1) j 1 ω j l=1 ϕ l β (l) (A.12) I- r i r f r i r f = ( r M r f ) β(1) + + {j=4,6,..., ˆm} {j=6,8,..., ˆm} ω j ϕ (j) β (2) 2 ω j ϕ (j) 5 + {j=4,6,..., ˆm} ω j ϕ (j) β (3) 3 + β (5) + + ω ˆmϕ ( ˆm) ˆm 2) ˆm 2 β( + ω ˆm ϕ ( ˆm) ˆm 1 {j=6,8..., ˆm} ˆm 1) β( ω j ϕ (j) β (4) 4 (A.13) 4 2 I- 24