PFI

Similar documents
(1) (Karlan, 2004) (1) (1973) (1978) (1991) (1991) 1

shuron.dvi

Auerbach and Kotlikoff(1987) (1987) (1988) 4 (2004) 5 Diamond(1965) Auerbach and Kotlikoff(1987) 1 ( ) ,

(2004 ) 2 (A) (B) (C) 3 (1987) (1988) Shimono and Tachibanaki(1985) (2008) , % 2 (1999) (2005) 3 (2005) (2006) (2008)

Title 最適年金の理論 Author(s) 藤井, 隆雄 ; 林, 史明 ; 入谷, 純 ; 小黒, 一正 Citation Issue Date Type Technical Report Text Version publisher URL

Winter 図 1 図 OECD OECD OECD OECD 2003

aragciv54mac.dvi

ct_root.dvi

第2章 第4代神奈川県庁舎(現本庁舎)の建設

headquarter Gertner et al. winner-picking Wal-Mart s

COE-RES Discussion Paper Series Center of Excellence Project The Normative Evaluation and Social Choice of Contemporary Economic Systems Graduate Scho

Autumn II III Zon and Muysken 2005 Zon and Muysken 2005 IV II 障害者への所得移転の経済効果 分析に用いるデータ

わが国企業による資金調達方法の選択問題

2015 : (heterogenous) Heterogeneous homogeneous Heterogenous agent model Bewley 1 (The Overlapping-Generations Models:OLG) OLG OLG Allais (1

fiúŁÄ”s‘ê‡ÌŁª”U…−…X…N…v…„…~…A…•‡Ì ”s‘ê™´›ß…−…^†[…fiŠ‚ª›Âfl’«

橡motonishi.PDF

1 Nelson-Siegel Nelson and Siegel(1987) 3 Nelson-Siegel 3 Nelson-Siegel 2 3 Nelson-Siegel 2 Nelson-Siegel Litterman and Scheinkman(199

BIS CDO CDO CDO CDO Cifuentes and O Connor[1] Finger[6] Li[8] Duffie and Garleânu[4] CDO Merton[9] CDO 1 CDO CDO CDS CDO three jump model Longstaff an


株式保有構成と企業価値 ─コーポレート・ガバナンスに関する一考察─

財政赤字の経済分析:中長期的視点からの考察

O x y z O ( O ) O (O ) 3 x y z O O x v t = t = 0 ( 1 ) O t = 0 c t r = ct P (x, y, z) r 2 = x 2 + y 2 + z 2 (t, x, y, z) (ct) 2 x 2 y 2 z 2 = 0

表紙_vol9_Summer_再.eps

表紙 vol.5-04

AD_表紙_FC

AD表紙vol.17.eps

AD表紙vol.17.eps

AD STUDIES Vol

所得税と課税最低限に関する一考察

研究シリーズ第40号

物価変動の決定要因について ― 需給ギャップと物価変動の関係の国際比較を中心に―

p *2 DSGEDynamic Stochastic General Equilibrium New Keynesian *2 2

IMES DISCUSSION PAPER SERIES Discussion Paper No. 99-J- 9 -J-19 INSTITUTE FOR MONETARY AND ECONOMIC STUDIES BANK OF JAPAN

ばらつき抑制のための確率最適制御

201711grade1ouyou.pdf

相互取引に伴う債権債務の依存構造を考慮した金融機関の与信評価について

23_02.dvi

2017 : (heterogenous) Heterogeneous homogeneous Heterogenous agent model Bewley 1 exante (The Overlapping-Generations Models:OLG) OLG OLG Al

2 Recovery Theorem Spears [2013]Audrino et al. [2015]Backwell [2015] Spears [2013] Ross [2015] Audrino et al. [2015] Recovery Theorem Tikhonov (Tikhon



1 CAPM: I-,,, I- ( ) 1 I- I- I- ( CAPM) I- CAPM I- 1 I- Jensen Fama-French 3 I- Fama-French 3 I- Fama-MacBeth I- SMB-FL, HML-FL Fama-MacBeth 1 Fama-Fr

商学 64‐6☆/4.寺岡

わが国銀行業の将来像― 預金通貨需要からのアプローチによるマクロ的サイズの検討―

Y-...W

ver.1 / c /(13)

遺産相続、学歴及び退職金の決定要因に関する実証分析 『家族関係、就労、退職金及び教育・資産の世代間移転に関する世帯アンケート調査』

untitled

(1.2) T D = 0 T = D = 30 kn 1.2 (1.4) 2F W = 0 F = W/2 = 300 kn/2 = 150 kn 1.3 (1.9) R = W 1 + W 2 = = 1100 N. (1.9) W 2 b W 1 a = 0

1: 3.3 1/8000 1/ m m/s v = 2kT/m = 2RT/M k R 8.31 J/(K mole) M 18 g 1 5 a v t πa 2 vt kg (

082_rev2_utf8.pdf

アジアの資本移動の変化に関するクラスター分析 アジア域内の証券投資活性化に向けて

Q & A Q A p

untitled

Jorgenson F, L : L: Inada lim F =, lim F L = k L lim F =, lim F L = 2 L F >, F L > 3 F <, F LL < 4 λ >, λf, L = F λ, λl 5 Y = Const a L a < α < CES? C

小塚匡文.indd

取引銀行の破綻が企業経営に及ぼす影響について-阪和銀行破綻の事例分析-

銀行の不良債権問題と資本市場の経営監視機能 鹿野嘉昭

メイン寄せリスクと貸出債権価値の評価:ゲーム論的リアルオプションによるアプローチ

1 Tokyo Daily Rainfall (mm) Days (mm)

Jacobson Prime Avoidance

Discussion Paper #


戦間期日本企業の資金調達、資本コスト、資本構成:最適資本構成理論からみた1930年代における企業財務

時間割引:双曲割引と弱加法性

I- Fama-French 3, Idiosyncratic (I- ) I- ( ) 1 I- I- I- 1 I- I- Jensen Fama-French 3 SMB-FL, HML-FL I- Fama-French 3 I- Fama-MacBeth Fama-MacBeth I- S

130 Oct Radial Basis Function RBF Efficient Market Hypothesis Fama ) 4) 1 Fig. 1 Utility function. 2 Fig. 2 Value function. (1) (2)

Graduate School of Policy and Management, Doshisha University 53 動学的資本税協調と公的資本形成 あらまし Zodrow and Mieszkowski 1986 Wilson 1986 Batina はじめに Zodr

カルマンフィルターによるベータ推定( )

02.„o“φiflì„㙃fic†j

03.Œk’ì

II

国際流動性に関する財政的側面について

デフレ不況下の金融政策をめぐる政治過程

橡表紙参照.PDF

On model selection problems in terms of prediction mean squared error and interpretaion of AIC (slides)

1990年代以降の日本の経済変動

,, 2. Matlab Simulink 2018 PC Matlab Scilab 2

.1 A cos 2π 3 sin 2π 3 sin 2π 3 cos 2π 3 T ra 2 deta T ra 2 deta T ra 2 deta a + d 2 ad bc a 2 + d 2 + ad + bc A 3 a b a 2 + bc ba + d c d ca + d bc +

) a + b = i + 6 b c = 6i j ) a = 0 b = c = 0 ) â = i + j 0 ˆb = 4) a b = b c = j + ) cos α = cos β = 6) a ˆb = b ĉ = 0 7) a b = 6i j b c = i + 6j + 8)

448 Vol. 44 No 図

坪沼

日本における財政政策のインパクトー1990年代のイベント・スタディー



日歯雑誌(H19・5月号)済/P6‐16 クリニカル  柿木 5

1 Jensen et al.[6] GRT S&P500 GRT RT GRT Kiriu and Hibiki[8] Jensen et al.[6] GRT 3 GRT Generalized Recovery Theorem (Jensen et al.[6])

bottleneckjapanese.dvi

149 (Newell [5]) Newell [5], [1], [1], [11] Li,Ryu, and Song [2], [11] Li,Ryu, and Song [2], [1] 1) 2) ( ) ( ) 3) T : 2 a : 3 a 1 :

非上場企業におけるコーポレート・ガバナンス

村本 孜51‐85/51‐85

II III II 1 III ( ) [2] [3] [1] 1 1:

paper01.PDF

04_田平正典.indd

untitled

高齢化とマクロ投資比率―国際パネルデータを用いた分析―

1: 合計特殊出生率 出生率の推移 暦年 アメリカドイツフランス スウェーデン日本 Apps and Re

産業・企業レベルデータで見た日本の経済成長.pdf

NewsLetter-No2

日歯雑誌(H22・7月号)HP用/p06‐16 クリニカル① 田崎

Transcription:

PFI 23 3 3

PFI PFI

1 1 2 3 2.1................................. 3 2.2..................... 4 2.3.......................... 5 3 7 3.1................................ 7 3.2................................. 9 3.2.1................................. 11 3.2.2.......................... 11 3.2.3.................. 13 3.2.4................................. 15 3.2.5.............................. 16 4 18 4.1........................... 18 4.2................................. 19 5 22 A 1 6

1 PFI Private Finance Initiative 10 PFI PFI PFI SPC 14) PFI SPC PFI 2 1

2 3 4 5 2

2 2.1 PFI PFI 14) PFI PFI 12) PFI 13) PFI PFI 11) PFI PFI principal-agent PA PA PA PA 3

2.2 PFI 11) PFI PFI 12) NPV t 4

2.3 1970 - Green 7) Diamond 5) Green Spear Srivastava 7) Thomas Worrall 10) Gromb 8) DeMarzo Fishman 6) Gromb 8) Biais 1) Demarzo DeMarzo Fishman 3) 5

6

3 3.1 PFI PFI I t d t t Y t {Y t } s < t E s [Y t ] = E [Y t ] = µ t r γ r Y 0 t Y t t s t Y t s t d t Y t s t Y t + s t d t (> 0) 1 λ [0, 1] 1 λ λ = 0 λ > 0 t Y t 7

t t W t t W t R t 0 L t s < t W s e r(t s) W t (3.1) R s e γ(t s) R t (3.2) L s e γ(t s) L t (3.3) (3.1) (3.2) (3.3) s Vs F B max e r(t s) Y t + e r(τ s) ( W τ + R τ + L τ ) (3.4) τ s s<t τ T V t W t + R t + L t for t T (3.5) t = T T 0 T T T T -3.1 t d t 8

第期 第 期 キャッシュフローが実現される エージェントがを政府に報告する 政府が補助金報酬を支払う エージェントあるいは政府が事業を中止 3.1 t s t t h t x t (h t ) h t t Y t t λ(y t +s t d t )+x t (h t ) h t t p t (h t ) 3.2 h t x t p t σ = (x, p) φ φ t s t [0, d t Y 0 t ] σ σ revelation principle 9) σ φ [ ] A t (σ, φ) = E t<s τ e γ(s t) (λ (Y s + s s d s ) + x s ) + e γ(τ t) R τ σ, φ, τ > t φ σ A t (σ, φ) (σ, φ) incentive compatible 9

σ φ t [ ] B t (σ, φ) = E t<s τ e r(s t) ( s s x s )) e r(τ t) W τ σ, φ, τ > t (σ, φ) A t B t common knowledge t a a subject to b e t(a) max σ,φ B t (σ, φ) A t (σ, φ) = a = max A t (σ, φ ) (3.6) φ (3.6) b e t t be t a a b e t (a) = b e t (a) t a t a a t -3.1 t Y t t t + 1 b e t t t b d t by t bd t b y t Y t T (σ, φ) 3 10

3.2.1 T T + T b e T T a > 0 γ r T + e γ(t + T ) a b e e (γ r)(t + T ) a T (a) = a 0 a < 0 (3.7) T r a a < 0 T T (3.7) t(< T ) b e t t -3.1 b e t 1 bd t bd t 2 b y t by t t b e t b e T a 0 b e t a e t 3.2.2 t x t b d t b d t ad t R t a d t a d t ( W t, R t ) b e t (a) convex hull ( W t, R t ) b e t(a) -3.2 ( W t, R t ) b e t be t a L t l t a d t [R t, a L t ] 11

配当区間 エージェントの利得 継続区間 清算区間 政府の利得 3.2 b e t bd t p t (a d t ) = al t a d t a L t R t (3.8) a L t p t h t a d t p t a d t x t 1 1 1 b e t a1 t x t (a d t ) = max(a d t a 1 t, 0) (3.9) 12

b d t b d t bd t (a) 1 (3.10) T a L T = γ > r a 1 T = R T P T = 1, x T = a d T R T, b d T (ad T ) = W T (a d T R T ) b d t 1 b e t l t > 1 l t = sup{ be t(a) + W t a R t : a > R t } a L t = inf{a > R t : b e t l t }, a 1 t = inf{a : b e t 1} b d t (a d t ) = b e t(a 1 t ) (a d t a 1 t ) a d t a 1 t b e t(a d t ) a L t a d t a 1 t b e t(a L t ) l t (a L t a d t ) R t at d < a L t a d t < R t (3.11) l t 1 a L t =, a 1 t = R t b d t (a d W t (a d t R t ) t ) = a d t R t a d t < R t (3.12) b d t (3.10) 3.2.3 b d t by t t t Y t s t s t a d t a d t 13

s t = d t Y t b y t (ay t ) = max a d t ( ) E[Y t + b d t (a d t (Y t ))] (3.13) s.t.(ic) a d t (Y t ) a d t (y) + λ(y t y) y [Y 0 t, Y t ] (3.14) E[a d t (Y t )] = a y t (3.15) a d t 3.14 3.15 t a y t E[a d t (Y t )] (3.13) (3.14) a d t (y) λy y a d t (y) y 3.14 ŷ t (Y t ) Y t a d t (ŷ t ) a d t (Yt ) = a d t (ŷ t (Y t )) + λ(y t ŷ t (Y t )) 3.14 a d t (ŷ t (Y t )) + λ(y t ŷ t (Y t )) a d t (Y t ) for y [Y 0 t, Y t ] a d t (Y t ) a d t (Yt ) = a d t (Y t ) ŷ t (Y t ) Y t ŷ t Y t [Y t + b d t (a d t (Yt ))] [ŷ t + b d t (a d t (ŷ t ))] = Y t ŷ t + b d t (a d t (ŷ t ) + λ(y t ŷ t )) b d t (a d t (ŷ t )) b d b t (a) 1 d t (ad t (ŷ t)+λ(y t ŷ t )) b d t (ad t (ŷ t)) a d t (ŷ t)+λ(y t ŷ t ) a d t (ŷ 1 t) [Y t + b d t (a d t (Yt ))] [ŷ t + b d t (a d t (ŷ t ))] Y t ŷ t λ(y t ŷ t ) = (Y t ŷ t )(1 λ) 0 14

2 b d t (3.10) µ t E[Y t ] y a d t (y) = a y t + λ(y µ t) (3.16) [ ] b y t (ay t ) = µ t + E b d t (a y t + λ(y t µ t )) (3.17) b y t 2 2 γ > r 1 (3.9) (3.16) 2 x t = λ max(y t D t, 0) (3.18) D t = µ t + λ 1 (a 1 t a y t ) 3.2.4 b y t be t 1 2 t a t a γ r 15

プロジェクト期間 キャッシュフロー 補償及び終了決定 3.3 3 b y t t b e t (a e t ) = e r(t t ) b y t (eγ(t t ) a e t ) (3.19) b e t (3.7) T b e T 1 2 3 T -3.3 s t s = t a e s t a y t = eγ(t s) a e s Y t a d t ad t x t p t a e t R t at d a L t 0 a d t = x t + a e t ad t < a L t p t x t = 0 a d t = (1 p t )a e t + p t R t -3.3 3.2.5 0 0 16

I Y 0 a d 0 = arg max b d 0(a) (3.20) a R 0 +Y 0 Y 0 + b d 0 (ad 0 ) I ad 0 al 0 1 a d 0 a1 0 3 17

4 4.1 T k t f T ˆr t 0 c L t t z > 0 N t z p t (z) = z/n t 1 p t (z) p t (z) 100 z (1 p t (z)) 1 p t (z) 100 L t W t p t p t 100 0 Y 0 I Y 0-4.1 t 18

プロジェクト 外部経済便益 政府 クレジットライン 引出 返済 エージェント 投資家 配当 株主 4.1 Y t s t d t 4.2 4 λ 100 (1 λ) 100 T = min{t : l t 1} T t I Y 0 d t = (1 + r 1 )(1 (1 + r) T ) L T t k t d t k t k t k t = µ t + λ 1 [ a 1 t e γ(t t ) a 1 t ], t (0, T ] (4.1) t s t = d t k t ˆr = γ c L t = λ 1 ( a 1 t a L ) t, t [0, T ) (4.2) 19

N t = λ 1 ( a L ) t R t, t [0, T ) (4.3) 0 c d 0 = ( λ 1 a 1 0 ) al 0 a d 0 (3.20) T c L T = 0 N T = L T T c d t a d t = a 1 t λc d t (4.4) 0 a 1 t 0 (4.2) a 1 t λc L t = a 1 t λ(λ 1 (a 1 t a L t )) = a L t 3 Y 3 1 Y 2 Y 3 Y 3 1 1 1 (1 λ) 1 λ 2 λ 100 λ 100 2 λ 3 (4.4) (4.4) 1 λ 3 λ 20

3 1 λ 3) 2) 1 k t t 0 k t µ t (4.4) a 1 t λ(k t µ t ) a 1 t a 1 t = e γ(t t ) [ a 1 t λ(k t µ t ) ] (4.5) (4.5) k t (4.1) 4 k t s t 4 21

5 1 PFI PFI 2 PFI 3 3 22

4 23

A 1 b d t -3.2 ( W t, R t ) R t R t a < R t b d t (a) = R t ( W t, R t ) b e t l t l t > 1 b e t al t a d t [R t, a L t ] a L t p t (??) p t R t + (1 p t )a L t = a d t p t ( W t ) + (1 p t )b e t (a L t ) = b e t (a L t ) + al t a d t a L t R (L t b e t(a L t )) = b e t (a L t ) l t (a L t R t ) t l t > 1 a 1 t a L t a1 t [R t, a 1 t ] a 1 t (3.18) x t b d t (a d t ) = b e t (a 1 t ) d t = b e t(a 1 t ) (a d t a 1 t ) l t 1 1 b d t (a d t ) = L t d t = L t (a d t R t ), for a d R t = a 1 t 2 (3.13) ŷ t (Y t ) Y t a d t (ŷ t ) a d t (Yt ) = a d t (ŷ t (Y t )) + λ(y t ŷ t (Y t )) (3.14) a d t (ŷ t (Y t )) + λ(y t ŷ t (Y t )) a d t (Y t ) for y [Y 0 t, Y t ] a d t (Y t ) a d t (Yt ) = a d t (Y t ) ŷ t (Y t ) Y t ŷ t Y t [Y t + b d t (a d t (Yt ))] [ŷ t + b d t (a d t (ŷ t ))] = Y t ŷ t + b d t (a d t (ŷ t ) + λ(y t ŷ t )) b d t (a d t (ŷ t )) 1

b d b t (a) 1 d t (ad t (ŷ t)+λ(y t ŷ t )) b d t (ad t (ŷ t)) a d t (ŷt)+λ(yt ŷt) ad t (ŷt) 1 [Y t + b d t (a d t (Yt ))] [ŷ t + b d t (a d t (ŷ t ))] Y t ŷ t λ(y t ŷ t ) = (Y t ŷ t )(1 λ) 0 g(y) a d t (y) λ(y) (3.14) g(y) y 3.15 E[g(Y t )] = a y t λµ t := g t E[Y t + b d t (λy t + g(y t ))] = µ t + E[b d t (λy t + g(y t ))] b d t b d t (λy t + g(y t )) b d t (λy t + g t ) + b d t (λyt + g t )(g(y t ) g t ) Y t ( ) E[b d t (λy t + g(y t ))] E[b d t (λy t + g t )] + Cov b d t (λyt + g t ), (g(y t ) g t ) b d t bd t (λyt + g t ) Y t g(y t ) g t Y t ( ) Cov b d t (λyt + g t ), (g(y t ) g t ) 0 ( ) E[b d t (λy t + g(y t ))] E[b d t (λy t + g t )] + Cov b d t (λyt + g t ), (g(y t ) g t ) E[b d t (λy t + g t )] E[Y t + b d t (a d t (Y t ))] = E[b d t (λy t + g(y t ))] g(y t ) = g t = a y t λµ t g(y t ) = a d t (Y t ) λy t a d t (Y t ) = a y t + λ(y t µ t ) y a d t (y) = a y t + λ(y µ t) 3 t a t a γ r 3 2

4 4 1 t c d t = λ 1 (a 1 t a d t ) a d t d t = λmax( c d t, 0) = max(a d t a 1 t, 0) t = T L t t < T p t p t = max(cd t c L t, 0) N t = max(λ 1 (a 1 t a d t ) λ 1 (a 1 t a L t ), 0) λ 1 (a L t R t) = max(al t a d t, 0) (a L t R t) c e t = max(min(c d t, c L t ), 0) = λ 1 max(min(a 1 t a d t, a 1 t a L t ), 0) = λ 1 (a 1 t min(max(a d t, a L t ), a 1 t ) = λ 1 (a 1 t a e t ) γ k t Y t 3

c d t + = e γ(t+ t)c e t + x t Y t + = e γ(t+ t) λ 1 (a 1 t a e t) + µ t + λ 1 (a 1 t e + γ(t+ t) a 1 t ) Y t + = λ 1 [a 1 t (e + γ(t+ t) a e t + λ(y t + µ t +))] = λ 1 (a 1 t a d + t ) + a d t ad t + 2 1 λ 1 λ t < T R t T R T L T R T + λl T T a e T > R T + λl T (A.1) a e T η a e T = η + E[e γ(τ T ) R τ ] (A.2) (1 λ) 100 (3.3) b e T (ae T ) = 1 λ η (A.3) λ R T E[e γ(τ T ) R τ ] (A.4) 4

(A.1) (A.4) a e T + be T (ae T ) 1 λ η + E[e γ(τ T ) R τ ] > 1 λ [R T E[e γ(τ T ) R τ ] + λl T ] + E[e γ(τ T ) R τ ] R T + L T l T 1 T 5

1) Bruno Biais, Thomas Mariotti: Dynamic Security Design: Convergence to Continuous Time and Asset Pricing Implications, Review of Economic Studies, Vol. 74, No. 2, pp. 345-390, 2007 2) Chiala,N. Garvin, M, J. Vever, J. Valuing Simple Multiple-Exercise Real Optionsin infrastructure Porjects, Journal of Infrastructure Systems, June 2007 pp.97-104. 3) Peter M. DeMarzo, Michael J. Fishman: Optimal Long-Term Financial Contracting, Review of Financial Studies, pp.2079-2128, 2007. 4) Peter M. DeMarozo, Yuliy Sannikonv, Optimal Security Design and Dynamic Capital Structure in a Continuous-Time Agency Model, Journal of Finance 61:2681-2724, 2006 5) Douglas W. Diamond, Financial Intermediation and Delegated Monitoring Review of Economic Studies 51:393.414. 6) Peter M. Demarzo, Michael J. Fishman: Agency and Optimal Investment Dynamics. Review of Financial Studies 20:151.88. 7) Edward J. Green: Lending and the Smoothing of Uninsurable Income, in E. Prescott, and N.Wallace (eds), Contractual Arrangements for Intertemporal Trade, Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press. 8) Denis Gromb: Renegotiation in Debt Contracts, working paper, MIT. 9) Myerson, R. B.: Bayesian equilibrium and incentive compatibility: An introduction, in J.-J. Laffont (ed.), Advances in Economic Theory: Sixth World Congress, Volume I, Cambridge University Press, 1985. 10) Jonathan Thomas, Tim Worrall: Income Fluctuation and Asymmetric Information: An Example of a Repeated Principal-Agent Problem, Journal of Economic Theory, 51, 367-390. 11) No.44,141-166 2002 6

12) PFI pp.937-942 2001 13) PFI Vol.12 pp.149-158. 14) PFI Vo.30 pp.15-30, 2000 7

GCOE GCOE