untitled

Similar documents
2

untitled

EU 食品安全政策の展開と動向

本文/YAZ172P

「農場から食卓まで」の食品安全

研究レポート表紙.PDF

IFAC International Auditing Practice Committee Issued by the International Federation of Accountants

021017部会資料案.PDF

橡食品班論文[1].PDF

Ł\”ƒ1PDFŠp

1997年11月発行



はじめに

YUHO

FAO Animal Health Manual No

【検疫】検疫所におけるスイス及びリヒテンシュタインから輸入される牛肉等の取扱いについて

2-栗原.TXT

untitled

大学論集第42号本文.indb

Huawei G6-L22 QSG-V100R001_02

73-5 大友

No.7, (2006) A Survey of Legislation Regarding Environmental Information in Europe and Japan IWATA Motokazu Nihon University, Graduate School of

目次

ICT 1 21 ICT., Cooper, Dawson

FAO家畜衛生マニュアル No

untitled

untitled

GDP 1962 Kingdom of Bhutan

イギリスにおける公的資金の配分状況

Japanese.PDF

Ł\”ƒ1PDFŠp

EC・GMO事件


untitled

公務員倫理問題への新アプローチ

米国における無形資産会計の変遷とその背景 ARB24 APB17 The transition and the background of Intangible assets accounting in U.S. It aims at the arrangement and the examinat

第1章 調査の概要

52-2.indb

shokuiku shokuiku 2

医療事故の現状と課題-医療事故への対応策の整備を中心に-

04菊崎泰枝_改

資料1-3


_??_ Fig. 1. Annual number of subjects who were bitten by possibly rabid animals in the rabies endemic regions and thereafter visited our vaccine clin

Business-Higher Education Forum(BHEF) Nils Haselmo Hank McKinnell CEO Working Together, Creating Knowledge---The University-Industry Research Collabor


< F2D816994D48D8693FC82E8816A C48D912E6A7464>

インドシナ産業基板基礎調査団報告書

目次

USDA Paul C. Westcott (2007)Scott A. Malcolm, Marcel Aillery and Marca Weinberg (2009)FAPRI( Food and Agricultural Policy Institute )(2009) RFS Seth M


untitled

2

untitled

untitled

大学における原価計算教育の現状と課題

5

Agricultural Marketing Service Audit, Review, and Compliance Branch STOP Room 2627-S 1400 Independence Avenue, SW. Washington, DC ARC 103

356 Nippon Shokuhin Kagaku Kogaku Kaishi Vol. /., No.1, -/0-0+ (,**1) 44 For Quality Control and Quality Assurance in Food Analysis Akemi Yasui Analyt

< F2D816994D48D8693FC82E8816A >

環境影響評価制度をめぐる法的諸問題(4) : 米国の環境影響評価制度について

Taro-03オーストリア解禁通知 (番号入り)

2 33,**. + : +/* /++** +/* /++** +/* /++** /** /** F+ +*** F+ +*** / 1*42.,43 /14+,*42 /, , 134,.,43 / 0-41,*42.4, -/41,*43,34,,+4. +

精神障害者

29 jjencode JavaScript

Vol.1 No Autumn

FC741E2_091201

世界知的所有権機関(WIPO)のホームページからの情報

EHC / EHC 1-8) WHO/IPCS CICAD (Concise Inter

untitled

NEWSLETTER Vol.26*.qxd


2

行動経済学の金融教育への応用の重要性

Fig. 1 Trends of TB incidence rates for all forms and smear-positive pulmonary TB in Kawasaki City and Japan. Incidence=newly notified cases of all fo

*.E (..).R



aircraft control and warning: AC&W The Air Defense of Japan 5 Richard Sneider

untitled

Green Light GxP HPLC 2

, ()


12_11B-5-00-omote※トンボ付き.indd

IEC :2014 (ed. 4) の概要 (ed. 2)

Table 1 Utilization of Data for River Water Table 2 Utilization of Data for Groundwater Quality Analysis5,6,9,10,13,14) Quality Analysis5-13) Fig. 1 G

CNN-37 (石村《案》)完成 HP用 .qxd

‘oŠÍ

3.持続可能な交通の国際比較

NO CR ( 2)

第5章 処分事業の概要

NOPR 1978 IPPIndependent Power Producer NOPR IPP PUCPublic Utility Commissions FERC Federal Energy Regulatory Commiss

eTA案内_ 完成TZ

T - Telecommunication and Internet Protocol Harmonization Over Networks (TIPHON); Service and Network Management Framework; Part 1: Overview and Intro

PDF.....p

untitled

untitled

0. 1. Opening Ceremony 2. Table Discussion (A~F) 3. Table Rotation 4. Symposium 5. Curriculum Exchange 6. Legal Course 7. Welcome Party 8. Life Style

-October TPP ASEAN RCEP TPP MV Islamic State, IS EU EU EU EU EU

Transcription:

SRM TMETransmissible Mink Encephalopathy CWDChronic Wasting Disease BSE 1

WB IHC BSE SRM SSOPHACCP BSE AMR 2

BSE BSE 3

4

15 48 24 3 Bovine Spongiform Encephalopathy BSE 17 5 24 1)2) 3) 4) BSE 5) BSE 2003 5 21 6) 2003 12 24 7) BSE 8) 9) SPS 10) 5

BSE BSE 2004 11 2004 4 24 BSE 3 BSE BSE SRM 3 BSE 12) 20049 BSE 4) 1015BSE 13) 10234 SRM 20 14) 20 13) SRMBSE 1026 2005 5) 524 1) 2003 5 21 BSE 2003 7 15) 2004 11 SRM 20 16) 5 24 2) 6

17) 18)BSE 2001 10 EC 2004 9 10 13) 2005 5 5) BSE SRM 20 19) 20) BSE 7

BSE SRM SSOPHACCP AMR BSE BSE BSE BSE 450 9,500 20 130 3,500 30 21) BSE BSE 1,500 3 800 160 500 450 3 21) 1989 BSE 22) 1997 22) 1980 90 BSE 323 327 8

23) 117 BSE 23) 206 210 323 117327 1171980 2003 563 1,762 23) 66 51 23) 497 1,711 563 661,762 511980 2003 80 1986 1989 16 60 90 100 23) 1990 2003 0 242 2 23) 100 24) 206 210 5 17 497/100 1,711/100 33 16 25) 0.16 16/100 211 227 206+5 210+17 6 7 211/33227/33 96 23) 4 26),27) BSE 33 1.5 1.8 (6 7)/4 1.5 7 1990 22) 1994 BSE 1996 BSE 22) 19802003 231698 28) 1993 500 2 28) 1980 1990 231 117 114 28) 117 198 { 231114 698500 19802003 } 308324 28) 58 33 28) 9

250291 { 30858324331980 2003 } 16,000340,000 100 1 24) 117 198 3 250/100291/100 120201 { 117 31983 } 4 6 120/33201/33 1989 BSE 22) 1997 2000 22) 5 140 1980 2003 23) 1989 39 1997 1999 77t 23) 524t 140 (39 77 684 2,1291980 2003 23) 227,572 405,863t 23) 1995 2000 9,000t 1987 2001 56,000 1999 2001 31,000 25) 100 12 45 684 2,129 /100 + 5 24 560 56,000/100 1988 22) 1990 BSE 2000 BSE 22) 19802003 0 149t 2 28) 149t 28) 0t 5,710 11,046t 0 11t 5,699 11,046t 28) 0 11t{ 5,710 5,69911,046 11,046 } 0 26t 10

250,000 310,000t 28) 100 1 0 0.11t 0/100 11/100 560t 1/5,100 1990 1,245 25) 29) 1994 29) 1995 643t 29) GBR 1999 2001 3,000t 2,000t 29) 29) 1994 29) 1995 100t 29) 1/2 1/12 33,000 6,500 10,000 3,000 5,000 25,00012,000 7,200 4,200 1,200 25) BSE 1/10 1/100 1.57 4 6 1/12~1/47 5,100 1/2 1/12 1.57 11

BSE 80 90% 60 21) SRM 1997 8 30) 200312BSE20041 31) 2004SRM 32) 2005 2005104FDABSE 33) BSE 30 0.15% 19978 34) 200412 SRM 35)36) 200510 1996 4 37) 2001 9 BSE 10 38) 2005 4 39) 1996 4 1997 12

8 2001 10 3 BSE 0.290.6 40 42) 1990 2004 1/40.10.360.290.60.290.6 2002 20 2004 1.5 1997 30) 2005 5 80 205255 996,1216,199 43) FDA 44) General Accounting OfficeGAO 45) 1998 3070 46) 1997 5058 47) 2005 6 97 48) 2005 6 FDA 12,575 FDA 3,288 8 90 97.1 48) 2005 2 25 GAO FDA BSE 45) CFIA 2005 1 BSE 1997 CFIA 49) 2005 5 13

7923 29 83456550 43) 50) 1996 4 37) 2001 9 165 5,129 51) 2001 10 38) 52) SRM 53) 665 1,274 3 54) 2005 3 54) 2002 2004 1 SRM BSE 99.4SRM 55)SRM SRM 53) SRM 56) 30 SRM 57) SRM 58) 30 SRM SRM SRM 2004 1 59) FDA 2005 10 4 33) TMETransmissible Mink Encephalopathy BSE TSE Transmissible Spongiform EncephalopathyTME TME TME 1985 TME TME TME 60) 1997 14

30) TME 61) 2004 2 TME CWDChronic Wasting Disease 1967 mule 1996 60) CWD 1% 71 1% 17% 62) CWD BSE 63) CWD CWD BSE 1997 30)34) BSE ECBSE 8,000 ID50 ID5050% 55) 99.4 55) SRM 1 P=1 10,000 ID50 OIE 1333 20 1/100 64) 100 ID50 10 P=0.1 10 10 10 ID50 100 P=1 100 10 1 10 100 10 100ID50 10 ID50 10 10 5 1 1 5 1 15

100 BSE 1990 5 24 46) 1993 (Animal and Plant Health Inspection ServiceAPHIS) National Veterinary Services Laboratories NVSL)IHC Immunohistochemistry 65)66) 1990 2001 16,829 67) 2002 2 IHC 2002 2004 5 31 57,654 67) BSE 1 2003 12 68) 2004 6 69) ELISA(Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay) IHC 2005 7 3 383,477 70) 16

2 BSE 2005 6 71) 1990199329 ELISA 72) NVSL State Veterinary Diagnostic LaboratoriesSVDL12 13 73) 2005 5 29 369,467 ELISA 74) 3 IHC 2005 6 3 (Office of Inspector General OIG) WB Western blot WB (National Animal Disease CenterNADC) Veterinary Laboratories AgencyVLA WB IHC IHC 71) 75) 2004 ELISA 2005 5 WB ELISA WB IHC IHC BSE 2005 6 OIE Manual of Standards WB 76) WB BSE 17

1992BSE 19922003 77)78) 19931 BSEIHC 79) 20 035BSE1 BSE20041ELISA 200423,55020052 005141820,9492005122200 5 1 11 77) BSE19921994IHC 79) 20039WB2004 ELISA 79) TSE CFIAWBELISA National Centre for Foreign Animal DiseaseNCFADBSEIHC IHCWB 78)80) 18

1) 2) BSE 3) 1994200128) 282005610) 1996 81) 1996 2001 2,247 2001 9 BSE 81) 2003 4 24 81) 2004 4 24 81) ELISA WB IHC 82) 82) 2005 9 24 202,398 ELISA IHC WB 2005 BSE 20 788 ELISA 2001 10 BSE BSE 12) ELISA WB IHC BSE 114 ELISA WB IHC 19

12) 2005 10 31 4,974,937 15 BSE 83) BSE BSE BSE 20 BSE 4 4 24 BSE 4 1.5 24 OIE BSE BSE 2 ELISA WB IHC 84) NVSL Standard operation procedure Appendix 1 (Obex) 72) ELISA 72) 77) 78) EU 3 12) a) WB OIE Manual of Standards WB SAF Immunoblot 76) 1995 1997 Proteinase K SAF SAF 20

350g WB b) (IHC ) IHC 1993 2005 5 IHC NVSL SOP GPPISOP 0032.03 72) OIE IHC OIE manual 85) ELISA WB IHC 12) IHC 2005 WB ELISA WB IHC IHC EU BSE BSE BSE 86) BSE 0.0028%2004 0.000262004 6 2005 6 21 0.00382004 6 1 2005 6 21 87) 9,500 450 21) 4,200 3,300 900 192 77 115 88) 94 19 98,100 8,300 24 88) 3,350 126 88) 2003 BSE 126 90 21

BSE BSE 11 3 BSE 35 39 1 88) 113 3 1100/35 BSE 1 2 /90 12.33 /11 270 1 3/113 270 1/12.3 BSE 1 2 32 2004 6 1 2005 6 21 BSE 0.0038% 52,817 80,000 66 87 BSE 3 5.3 2 8 3 2 90 12.3 90 3 3/8 90 1/12.3 360 22 6360 /98 6 7 5 6 4 5 100 5 6 100 1 100 5 6 BSE 22

BSE(2003) 9,500 4,200 3,300 900 1,500 600 500 100 450 200 77 115 46 82 3,350 190.57% 503,3001.5%) 449004.8% 113 430 53,000 130 8,3000.66% 11,300771.7% 86,8001158.7%) 10.6 30270 27011313 3935%1 3/ 90833 5.32 3/ 12624409 3090 901123 12.3 1132011 902 30 1 30 4/380 6/98 5/100 32/3,000 36 951 22/360 28 161 12/30 67 1005 BSE 1.5 7 4 6 1/12 1/47 1/5,100 BSE BSE SRM 10 7 1.5 BSE BSE 5 6 4 5 20 30 3 BSE 100 BSE 23

20 20 20 30 89) 20 40 19)90) 58) 2004 11 4,500 3,338 40 90) 21 237 A50 A40 18 21 1,748 A50 A40 21 40 99 1.92%439 99% 0.95% 91) 90 2,510 1040 251 21 48,00024,000 100 1 BSE 1 20 1 20 1 40 1 2001 1 2002 7 1 2005 3 92) 95) 20 2003 12 24

96) 90 2,510 2,700 1,650 1,050 400 2,430 80 20 97) 98) 2005 10% 25% 58) 99) 40 10 99) 430 20 21) 100) 130 24 22 42 35 101) BSE 20 BSE 18 2 102) BSE 103) 105) 1 5,000 58)106) 107) 2 1 2,500 1 300 1 8 12 1 400 3 104) 1 175 2 150 175 2 150 50100 1 1 4 1 80 BSE 20 BSE 25

BSE 18 BSE 1 20 108) BSE 2001 9 BSE 10 BSE BSE 54 2005 8 BSE 21 109) 2005 10 BSE 30 2005 7 25 34 110) BSE 2004 1 57) 2000 79) 2004 10 160 149 30 19 111) 2004 12 80% 112) 54) 2005 113) 80% SRM SRM SRM 30 26

2005 10 30 SRM 57) 114) SRM 19) 20) SRM 114) 116) 2001 9 BSE GFAP 117) 91.92005 1 111) 30 2 3 5 6 58) 116) GFAP SSOPHACCP SSOPSanitation Standard Operating Procedures 118) HACCP Hazard Analysis and Critical Control Point2005 3 SSOP SSOP HACCP 89)119) SRM SSOP 2 120) SRM Food Safety and Inspection ServiceFSIS SRM 2004 1 2005 5 1,036 121) 1,036 1,036 HACCP 405 SRM SRM 467 164 SSOPHACCP SRM 27

6 BSE BSE BSE BSE VLA BSE 122) 123) 61826 32 719971 98 BSE 61018 2722 24 10 5 1 45 122) 123) BSE BSE 94 BSE 124) 125) BSE BSE BSE 1992 20 BSE BSE 2004 49 2005 38 BSE BSE AMR 30 1 10 58) 30 30 58) 21 20 AMR 28

SRM 30 AMR AMR 57) AMR 126) BSE SRM BSE 6 127) BSE 3 BSE WB 3 2 IHC 3 1 BSE 128) FSIS 2005 10 7 2005 11 7 129) SRM SRM SSOP 119) 130) A40 A40 A40 20 A40 21 BSE 20 BSE BSE 20 29

BSE BSE SRM SSOPHACCP 80 SRM 20 BSE A40 SRM 2001 4 2005 5 6 BSE 20 2004 2004 2 BSE 100 100 100 2 3 5 6 10 20 20 20 2,510 360 130 30

BSE 2 3 5 6 5 6 100 1 12 20 BSE 1 80 80 BSE SRM AMR HACCPSSOP SRM HACCP SSOP GFAP SSOP 31

10 250 20 70 130 20 A40 40 10 250 20 10 250 20 70 130 500 70 250 70 BSE BSE SRM 20 2 1 32

SRM SRM BSE BSE BSE 99.4% SRM SRM 21 33

1. 17 5 24 0524001 17 1380 2. 17 5 24 0524002 17 1382 3. 96 4., BSE 2004 9 5., BSE 2005 5 6. Canadian Food Inspection AgencyCFIA 11, Summary of the the report of the investigation of Bovine Spongiform Encephalopathy (BSE) in AlbertaCanada 1 2003 7 2 7. BSE 2003 12 26 http://www.maff.go.jp/www/press/cont/20031226press_7.htm 8. 22 233 9 2 9. 26 166 37 40 44 10. WTO 1 Agreement on the application of sanitary and phytosanitary measures SPS 5 7 11. 8 BSE 2004 1 19 http://www.maff.go.jp/www/press/cont/20040119press_4.htm 12. 11BSE WG 2004 7 22 13. 16 10 15 1015001 16 5410 14. 2004 10 23 http://www.maff.go.jp/www/press/cont2/20041023/kossi.htm 15. 8 BSE 2003 7 9 http://www.maff.go.jp/www/press/cont/20030709press_6.htm 16. 9 BSE 2004 11 8 http://www.maff.go.jp/www/press/cont2/20041108press_11.htm 17. 25 18. 26 233 11 3 19. United States Department of Agriculture 34

USDA USDA EV 2005 5 26 20. CFIA 2005 5 16 21. 2005 6 10 6 22. 2005 6 10 2 BSE 23. 31European Food Safety Authority EFSAWorking group report on the assessment of the Geographical BSE-Risk (GBR) of United States of America 2004 24. Scientific Steering Committee SSC Update of the opinion of the Scientific Steering Committee on the Geographical Risk of Bovine Spongiform Encephalopathy(GBR) 2002 1 11 25. BSE BSE BSE-BSE 2003 9 26. The BSE Inquiry Vol.16 Reference Material 27. Horn Committee s report2000 10 28. 31EFSAWorking group report on the assessment of the Geographical BSE-Risk (GBR) of Canada 2004 29. 10 21 5 30. 21 Title 21 Code of Federal Regulations Sec.689.2000 1997 8 4 31. FDAExpanded Mad Cow Safeguards Announced to Strengthen Existing Firewalls Against BSE Transmission2004 11 26 http://www.fda.gov/bbs/topics/news/2004/hhs_012604.html 32. 24FDA Center for Veterinary MedicineCVM CVM UpdateFDA AND USDA REQUEST COMMENTS AND SCIENTIFIC INFORMATION ON POSSIBLE NEW BSE SAFEGUARDS2004 7 9 33. FDA FDA NewsFDA Proposes Additional Mad Cow Safeguards2005 10 4 http://www.fda.gov/bbs/topics/news/2005/new01240.html 34. 23CFIACFIA Canada s Feed Ban RegulationsCanada Gazette, Part,Vol.131,No.16,p2317 1997 7 25 35. 25CFIACFIA News ReleaseNew Regulation Proposed For BSE-Related Feed Controls2004 12 10 36. 26 CFIA CFIA News Release Backgrounder on New Regulations Proposed for BSE-Related Feed Controls2004 12 10 35

37. 1996 4 16 8 5 38. 2001 10 15 133 39. 2005 2 28 15 40. DEFRA Department for Environment Food and Rural Affairs BSE: Statistics-Confirmed cases of BSE in GB by year of birth where known http://www.defra.gov.uk/animalh/bse/statistics/bse/yrbirth.html 41. OIE Office International des Epizooties Geographical Distribution of Countries that reported BSE Confirmed Cases since 1989 http://www.oie.int/eng/info/en_esb.htm 42. Avis du Comite d Experts Speciallise sur les ESST sur le suivi de l epizootied ESB en France 43. 26 BSE 2005 5 19 44. 23 CVM CVM Update-Update on Feed Enforcement Activities to Limit the Spread of BSE-2005 3 17 45. 25 General Accountig OfficeGAOMAD COW DISEASE,GAO-05-101 FDA s Management of the Feed Ban Has Improved, but Oversight Weaknesses Continue to Limit Program Effectiveness 2005 2 25 46. SSCReport on the Assessment of the Geographical BSE-RiskGBRof the UNITED STATES of AMERICA2000 7 47. 12BSE 2005 3 3 http://japan.usembassy.gov/j/p/tpj-j20050304-50.html 48. CVM CVM Update-Update on Feed Enforcement Activities to Limit the Spread of BSE-2005 6 10 http://www.fda.gov/cvm/bse0605.htm 49. 24CFIAFeed Ban Review2005 3 2 50. SPARKS COMPANIES INC.North American Feed Complex Multi-Client Study 2004 5 51. 15 2001 10 25 52. 2001 10 1 13 3326 53. 2001 10 17 209 54. 2005 6 10 1. 36

BSE 55. SSC Opinion on the Scientific Steering Committee on the human exposure riskhervia food with respect to BSE1999 12 10 56. 2001 10 1 13 3388 57. 30Federal Register/Vol.69,No.72004 1 12 58. 14 16 (B)(1) 1 2005 3 59. 9 The Secretary s Foreign Animal and Poultry Disease Advisory Committee s SubcommitteeReport on Measure Relating to BSE in the United States BSE 2004 2 2 60. 2 BSE2002 8 20 61. Williams, E.S., Miller, M.W. Transmissible spongiform encephalopathies in non domestic animals; origin transmission and risk factors. Rev sci tech Off Int Epiz.(2003) 22:145-156 62. Miller, M.W., Williams, E.S., McTarty, C.W., Spraker, T.R., Kreeger, T.J., Larsen, C.T., Thorne, E.T. Epizootiology of chronic wasting disease in free-ranging cervids in Colorado and Wyoming. J Wildl Dis. (2000)36:676-690. 63. Williams, E.S. Chronic wasting disease. Vet Pathol. (2005) 42:530-49. 64. Schreuder, B.E.C., Geertsma, R.E., van Keulen, L.J.M., van Asten, J.A.A.M., Enthoven, p., Oberthur, R.C., de Koeijer, A.A., Osterhaus, A.D.M.E., 1998. Studies on the efficacy of hyperbaric rendering procedures in inactivating bovine spongiform encephalopathy(bse) and scrapie agents.vet Rec. Vol.142:pp.474-480 65. APHIS(Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service)BSE Surveillance2004 5 20 (http://www.aphis.usda.gov/lpa/issues/bse/bse-surveillance.html 66. 32Harvard Center for Risk AnalysisEvaluation of the Potential for BSE in the United States 2001 11 26 67. 29USDAAdditional Question and Requests to USDA 2005 4 68. 35USDASummary of the Epidemiological Findings of North American Bovine Spongiform Encephalopathy Positive Cattle 2005 4 69. 27APHISBSE Surveillance Plan2004 3 15 70. 2005 7 8 5. 71. 2005 7 8 6. 6 10 37

72. 2005 9 9 4. ELISAWB IHC 73. NVSL BSE Network Labs2004 5 17 http://www.aphis.usda.gov/vs/nvsl/labcertification/bselabs.htm 74. APHIS BSE Test Results http://www.aphis.usda.gov/lpa/issues/bse_testing/test_results.html 75. 2005 7 29 1. 2 BSE 76. 2005 8 22 2. 77. 28CFIANational Bovine Spongiform Encephalopathy(BSE) Surveillance program2005 3 24 78. 29CFIASurveillance2005 5 79. Government of CanadaTechnical Overview of BSE in Canada2005 6 80. 2005 7 8 7. BSE 81. 21 2 2005 3 11 82. 2004 11 29 83. BSE http://www.mhlw.go.jp/houdou/0110/h1018-6.html 84. 2005 9 20 85. 2005 7 29 BSE 86. 2005 10 21 1. BSE 87. 2005 7 8 3. BSE BSE 88. 2005 7 29 89. 2005 7 8 13 SSOP HACCP 90. 36 91. 2005 7 8 92. 34CFIAAttachment 3.0 Age Verification2005 3 25 93. 35CFIAAttachment 3.1 Canadian Cattle Identification 38

Agency2005 3 25 94. 36CFIAAttachment 3.2 ATQ 2005 3 25 95. 37CFIA Attachment 3.3 Audit protocol to verify the accuracy of birth date information in the CCIA and ATQ 2005 3 25 96. 16 3-2 97. 13 USDA OVERVIEW OF THE U.S. BEEF INDUSTRY 2004 10 98. 15 National Agricultural Statistics Service USDA Livestock Slaughter 2004 Summary 99. 2005 9 22 1. 100. 14CFIAOverview of Canada s Safeguards2005 2 21 101. 172005 3 102. BSE Q&ABSE http://www.mhlw.go.jp/topics/0103/tp0308-1.html 103. 2005 8 22 5. 104. 2005 9 9 2. 105. 2005 9 22 1. 106. 2005 6 10 7. 107. 2005 6 20 1. 108. DEFRA(Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs) BSE : Statistics - Youngest and oldest cases by year of onset-gb ( Passive surveillance only ) (http://www.defra.gov.uk/animalh/bse/statistics/bse/yng-old.html 109. 2005 7 1 110 110. 2005 7 29 3. 1 111. 17 3-2 BSE 112. 16 3-1 39

113. 2005 4 19 0419001 114. 30CFIARemoval of Specified Risk Materials(SRM) from Cattle Slaughtered in Establishments Inspected Under the Meat Inspection Regulations,19902003 24 115. 2005 7 8 13 116. 2005 10 21 117. 13 BSE 118. 21 BSE 17 1 119. 2005 8 22 1. SSOP 120. 2005 10 7 1007001 BSE 121. 2005 9 9 8. 122. Wells, G.A., Hawkins, S.A., Green, R.B., Austin, A.R., Dexter, I., Spencer, Y.I., Chaplin, M.J., Stack, M.J., Dawson, M. Preliminary observations on the pathogenesis of experimental bovine spongiform encephalopathy (BSE): an update. Vet Rec. (1998)142: 103-106. 123. Wells, G.A., Spiropoulos, J., Hawkins, S.A., Ryder, S.J. Pathogenesis of experimental bovine spongiform encephalopathy: preclinical infectivity in tonsil and observations on the distribution of lingual tonsil in slaughtered cattle. Vet Rec. (2005)156: 401-407. 124. Buschmann, A., Groschup, M.H. Highly bovine spongiform encephalopathy-sensitive transgenic mice confirm the essential restriction of infectivity to the nervous system in clinically diseased cattle. J Infect Dis. (2005) 192: 934-942. 125. Iwamaru, Y., Okubo, Y., Ikeda, T., Hayashi, H., Imamura, M., Yokoyama, T., Shinagawa, M.: PrPSc distribution of a natural case of bovine spongiform encephalopathy. International Symposium Prion Disease Food and Drug Safety, Sendai, Japan 2004. 126. 2005 9 9 6. 40

127. SSC Opinion on TSE infectivity distribution in ruminant tissues(state of knowledge,december 2001) 128. 2005 BSE 3 2005 8 2627 129. FSISTo Allow Use Of Small Intestine From U.S. And Eligible Countries http://www.fsis.usda.gov/news_&_events/nr_090705_01/index.asp 130. 2005 8 22 6. 41