:EM,,. 4 EM. EM Finch, (AIC)., ( ), ( ), Web,,.,., [1].,. 2010,,,, 5 [2]., 16,000.,..,,. (,, )..,,. (socio-dynamics) [3, 4]. Weidlich Haag.

Similar documents
求人面接資料PPT

contents

APR. JUL. AUG. MAY JUN. 2

極地研 no174.indd

初めに:

_2009MAR.ren

「産業上利用することができる発明」の審査の運用指針(案)

有明海・八代海総合調査評価委員会 委員会報告書 別添資料


本文

03.Œk’ì

untitled

請求記号:DVD 70- -1  栄光のフィレンツェ・ルネサンス  1 夜明け   55分 

untitled

1 Nelson-Siegel Nelson and Siegel(1987) 3 Nelson-Siegel 3 Nelson-Siegel 2 3 Nelson-Siegel 2 Nelson-Siegel Litterman and Scheinkman(199

i Page ix xi xiii xv

第33回 ESRI-経済政策フォーラム

Hi-Stat Discussion Paper Series No.248 東京圏における 1990 年代以降の住み替え行動 住宅需要実態調査 を用いた Mixed Logit 分析 小林庸平行武憲史 March 2008 Hitotsubashi University Research Unit

k3 ( :07 ) 2 (A) k = 1 (B) k = 7 y x x 1 (k2)?? x y (A) GLM (k

研究シリーズ第40号

山形大学紀要

provider_020524_2.PDF

Kobe University Repository : Kernel タイトル Title 著者 Author(s) 掲載誌 巻号 ページ Citation 刊行日 Issue date 資源タイプ Resource Type 版区分 Resource Version 権利 Rights DOI

自殺の経済社会的要因に関する調査研究報告書

名称未設定-5

PBO 2000~ PBO Funded Ratio - 12/31/93 to Present 140% 130% 120% 110% 100% 90% 82.6% as of 7/31/ % 70% 81.6% as of YE % 1993

生活設計レジメ

44 4 I (1) ( ) (10 15 ) ( 17 ) ( 3 1 ) (2)

I II III 28 29


X X X Y R Y R Y R MCAR MAR MNAR Figure 1: MCAR, MAR, MNAR Y R X 1.2 Missing At Random (MAR) MAR MCAR MCAR Y X X Y MCAR 2 1 R X Y Table 1 3 IQ MCAR Y I

k2 ( :35 ) ( k2) (GLM) web web 1 :

On model selection problems in terms of prediction mean squared error and interpretaion of AIC (slides)

eBook白書_日本の研究者の声_A4PDF用_ クレジット

DEIM Forum 2019 D3-5 Web Yahoo! JAPAN Q&A Web Web

Isogai, T., Building a dynamic correlation network for fat-tailed financial asset returns, Applied Network Science (7):-24, 206,

ohpmain.dvi

Talk 2. Local asymptotic power of self-weighted GEL method and choice of weighting function Kouchi International Seminar on Recent Developments of Qua

,.,. NP,., ,.,,.,.,,, (PCA)...,,. Tipping and Bishop (1999) PCA. (PPCA)., (Ilin and Raiko, 2010). PPCA EM., , tatsukaw

149 (Newell [5]) Newell [5], [1], [1], [11] Li,Ryu, and Song [2], [11] Li,Ryu, and Song [2], [1] 1) 2) ( ) ( ) 3) T : 2 a : 3 a 1 :

橡表紙参照.PDF

福光 寛 1‐37/1‐37

< D906C95B639352D8BF E954690E690B D5A CC8F898D5A816A2E706466>

1 Tokyo Daily Rainfall (mm) Days (mm)

448 Vol. 44 No 図

RTM RTM Risk terrain terrain RTM RTM 48

Title 最適年金の理論 Author(s) 藤井, 隆雄 ; 林, 史明 ; 入谷, 純 ; 小黒, 一正 Citation Issue Date Type Technical Report Text Version publisher URL

,.,.,,. [15],.,.,,., , 1., , 1., 1,., 1,,., 1. i

seminar0220a.dvi

2015壺溪塾表1表4_0105

untitled

Evaluation of a SATOYAMA Forest Using a Voluntary Labor Supply Curve Version: c 2003 Taku Terawaki, Akio Muranaka URL: http

untitled

1 (1997) (1997) 1974:Q3 1994:Q3 (i) (ii) ( ) ( ) 1 (iii) ( ( 1999 ) ( ) ( ) 1 ( ) ( 1995,pp ) 1

Masahiro NAKANO Keynes benchmark Keynes 89

66-1 田中健吾・松浦紗織.pwd

Internet Week '98 (c) JPNIC, NTTPC, moto kawasaki WP, niana, wwtld Internet Governance Moto JPNIC DOM-WG / NTTPC 9

(Junjiro Ogawa),,,,, 1 IT (Internet Technology) (Big-Data) IoT (Internet of Things) ECO-FORUM 2018 ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) 1

欧州に見るマイナス金利が銀行に及ぼす影響

27 YouTube YouTube UGC User Generated Content CDN Content Delivery Networks LRU Least Recently Used UGC YouTube CGM Consumer Generated Media CGM CGM U

2005 1

main.dvi

( ) Loewner SLE 13 February

Title ベンチャー企業の研究開発支出の決定要因 日本と台湾の事例を中心に Author(s) 蘇, 顯揚 Citation 經濟論叢 (1996), 158(1): Issue Date URL Right

(b) (a) M: LF HF

082_rev2_utf8.pdf

1. 2 Blank and Winnick (1953) 1 Smith (1974) Shilling et al. (1987) Shilling et al. (1987) Frew and Jud (1988) James Shilling Voith (1992) (Shilling e

わが国企業による資金調達方法の選択問題

Abstract Gale-Shapley 2 (1) 2 (2) (1)

62 No.11

○01 那覇市(7月変更)


Power Transformation and Its Modifications Toshimitsu HAMASAKI, Tatsuya ISOMURA, Megu OHTAKI and Masashi GOTO Key words : identity transformation, pow

Vol.58 No (Sep. 2017) 1 2,a) 3 1,b) , A EM A Latent Class Model to Analyze the Relationship Between Companies Appeal Poi

5 5.1 A B mm 0.1mm Nominal Scale 74

[1], B0TB2053, i

(a) (b) (c) Canny (d) 1 ( x α, y α ) 3 (x α, y α ) (a) A 2 + B 2 + C 2 + D 2 + E 2 + F 2 = 1 (3) u ξ α u (A, B, C, D, E, F ) (4) ξ α (x 2 α, 2x α y α,

講義のーと : データ解析のための統計モデリング. 第5回



yasi10.dvi

訪問看護ステーションにおける安全性及び安定的なサービス提供の確保に関する調査研究事業報告書

’V‰K2.ren

untitled

Microsoft Word - 導水路はいらない!愛知の会 会報12号.doc

22 / ( ) OD (Origin-Destination)

i


Wide Scanner TWAIN Source ユーザーズガイド

2 / 24

Vol. 29, No. 2, (2008) FDR Introduction of FDR and Comparisons of Multiple Testing Procedures that Control It Shin-ichi Matsuda Department of

<4D F736F F D B B83578B6594BB2D834A836F815B82D082C88C60202E646F63>

, 1), 2) (Markov-Switching Vector Autoregression, MSVAR), 3) 3, ,, , TOPIX, , explosive. 2,.,,,.,, 1

untitled


カルマンフィルターによるベータ推定( )

Auerbach and Kotlikoff(1987) (1987) (1988) 4 (2004) 5 Diamond(1965) Auerbach and Kotlikoff(1987) 1 ( ) ,

小塚匡文.indd

2 (S, C, R, p, q, S, C, ML ) S = {s 1, s 2,..., s n } C = {c 1, c 2,..., c m } n = S m = C R = {r 1, r 2,...} r r 2 C \ p = (p r ) r R q = (q r ) r R

HKG1.xls

Transcription:

:EM,,. 4 EM. EM Finch, (AIC)., ( ), ( ),. 1. 1990. Web,,.,., [1].,. 2010,,,, 5 [2]., 16,000.,..,,. (,, )..,,. (socio-dynamics) [3, 4]. Weidlich Haag. [5]. 606-8501,, TEL:075-753-5515, FAX:075-753-4919, E-mail:aki@i.kyoto-u.ac.jp 1

. push pull [6]. push, ( ). pull, ( ).,., 1 16,000,, EM, [7].,,,.. 2,. 3,. 4,,. 5 4. 6. 2,., Web Web API, csv. (http://www.jalan.net). 16,000.. (i). (ii) Web. (iii) Web,. (iv)., Web 2 1.. 1.,.,,. 2009 12 24 2010 11 4.. 1 3 1,000., 2010 1 1 8,000, 2010 3 4 9,000, 2010 8 31 9,000,,.. 2. ( ),,.,., 7 8 2

1: ( ) URL.,., 1 2 6.,.,., z m (t) = max Y m (t) + 10 Y m (t)., Y m (t) t m. ( ),,, ( ), ( ), ( ). 3. 3 3.1 t, m z m (t). Pr Zm (

histgram 10000 9000 8000 7000 6000 5000 4000 3000 2000 1000 0 0 20000 40000 60000 80000 100000 price 2010-01-01 2010-03-04 2010-08-31 1: 2010 1 1, 2010 3 4, 2010 8 31. z m (t) (t = 1,..., T ) m t., (1) L m (a m1,..., a mkm, r m1,..., r mkm ) = (K m (Mr mi ) zm(s) log a mi e ), Mrmi (2) z m (s)! s=1. r mi, a mi (i = 1,..., K m ), K m a mi = 1 {â m1,..., â mk, ˆr m1,..., ˆr mk } = arg max {a mi },{r mi } L m (a m1,..., a mkm, r m1..., r mk ) (3). A, (3)., a (ν+1) mi = 1 T r (ν+1) mi = 1 M F (ν) mi a (ν) mi F (ν) mi (z m(t)) m (z m (t)) T z m(t) F (ν) mi (z m(t)) m (z m (t)) T F (ν) mi (z m(t)) m (z m (t)) (Mr(ν) (x) = x! K m m (x) = mi )x e Mr(ν) mi a (ν) mi F (ν) mi (i = 1,..., K m ), (4) (i = 1,..., K m ). (5), (6) (x), (7) 4

180000 160000 140000 120000 100000 80000 60000 40000 20000 0 Jan-2010 Feb-2010 Mar-2010 Apr-2010 May-2010 Jun-2010 Jul-2010 Aug-2010 Sep-2010 Oct-2010 Nov-2010 # of opportunities 2: 2009 12 24 2010 11 4.. EM [9, 10]. 3.3 Finch EM, EM,.,.,,., Finch [11]. Finch. a (0) mi K m a(0)., a (0) mi mi = 1 s z m (t s ) (s = 1,..., T ) K m a (0)) mi., i r (0) im µ mi, r (0) im = µ mi/m., a (0) m1,..., a(0) mk m [0, 1] 1., r (0) m1,..., r(0) mk m Finch. (18)., EM.. 5

600 500 010502 (Otaru) 072005 (Aizu-Kohgen,Yunogami,Minami-Aizu) 136812 (Shiragane) 171408 (Yuzawa) 400 constant - # of plans 300 200 100 0 Jan-01 Feb-01 Mar-01 Apr-01 May-01 Jun-01 Jul-01 Aug-01 Sep-01 Oct-01 Nov-01 date 3: 010502 ( ), 072005,, ( ), 136812 ( ), 171408 ( ).,.. (0) maxobj = 0 counter = 0. (1) [0, 1] b mi, a mi a mi = b mi / Km b mi. (2) r mi Finch. counter > MAXCOUNT (6). (3) L m (a m1,..., a mk m, r m1,..., r mk m ) maxobj, maxobj, r mi := r mi a mi := a mi (4). (4). (1). (4) (a m1..., a mkm, r m1,..., r mkm ), (4) (5). (5), maxobj,. (6) counter = counter + 1. counter < MAXCOUNT, (1)., (7). (7) maxobj. 6

3.4 (AIC) K m., ˆL m = s=1 AIC(K m ) = 4K m 2ˆL m, (8) ˆK m = arg min AIC(K m ). (9) K m (K m (M ˆr mi ) z m(s) ) log â mi e M ˆr mi. (10) z m (s)! 2K m. z m (s), R mi (z) = z log M + log ˆr mi M ˆr mi,. ( ) log z!. (11) î s = arg maxr mi (z m (s)). (12) i 4. z(s) (s = 1,..., T ). { r(t) = ri w.p. a i z(t) Pr(l = Z(t) r(t)) = (Mr(t))l l! e Mr(t). (13), K, a i i (i = 1,..., K; K a i = 1). K = 12, M = 100, 000, 000,. 2( ) T = 200... 4( ) K AIC ˆK = 12. Kolmogorov- Smirnov.. 4( ) KS. ˆK = 12 KS 0.327(<1.36), 5%.. 2( ).,.. 5, 8.0 10 6, ˆr i (t) r i (t) /r i (t) 0.3 %. 7

2: ( ). K = 12. EM ( ). AIC ˆK = 12, AIC = 3803.20. r 1 0.000025 a 1 0.109726 r 1 0.000024 a 1 0.09000 r 2 0.000223 a 2 0.070612 r 2 0.000222 a 2 0.07000 r 3 0.000280 a 3 0.073355 r 3 0.000280 a 3 0.05500 r 4 0.000479 a 4 0.077612 r 4 0.000479 a 4 0.06500 r 5 0.000613 a 5 0.094848 r 5 0.000613 a 5 0.08000 r 6 0.000652 a 6 0.073841 r 6 0.000651 a 6 0.09500 r 7 0.001219 a 7 0.090867 r 7 0.001218 a 7 0.10417 r 8 0.001233 a 8 0.062191 r 8 0.001232 a 8 0.08082 r 9 0.001295 a 9 0.077662 r 9 0.001294 a 9 0.08500 r 10 0.001341 a 10 0.102573 r 10 0.001341 a 10 0.10500 r 11 0.001412 a 11 0.085892 r 11 0.001412 a 11 0.08000 r 12 0.001570 a 12 0.080821 r 12 0.001568 a 12 0.09000 5,. M = 1, 000, 000, 000, 4.. 3 4. AIC,. 3., AIC KS., AIC KS 5%. m t p mk (k = 1,..., n m (t)) P m (t) = 1 n m (t) p mk (t) (14) n m (t). t r m (t) t k=1 10000 9000 2 1.8 5% confidence level AIC 8000 7000 6000 5000 KS statistics 1.6 1.4 1.2 4000 1 3000 10 15 20 25 30 K 0.8 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 K 4: K AIC ( ). AIC K = 12 3803.20. K KS ( ). 5%. 8

0.0016 0.0014 0.0012 0.004 0.0035 0.003 relative error r 0.001 0.0008 0.0006 relative error 0.0025 0.002 0.0015 0.0004 0.001 0.0002 0.0005 0 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 t 0 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 t 5: r ( ). ( ). 3: 4 AIC, (ll), p, KS K AIC ll p-value KS value ( ) 12 3558.31 1756.15 0.807 0.532,, ( ) 10 3009.10 1485.55 0.187 1.088 ( ) 5 2572.33 1277.17 0.107 1.245 ( ) 11 3695.25 1826.62 0.465 0.850.. 6.,,.,. 6, 2009 12 25 2010 11 4. EM Finch,..,.,, 4,. Kolmogorov-Smirnov 5%.,.,,.,,.,,. 9

45000 40000 35000 30000 25000 20000 15000 10000 5000-7 5.0x10 1.0x10-6 probability r (c) 55000 50000 45000 40000 35000 30000 25000 20000 15000 1.0x10-6 2.0x10-6 3.0x10-6 4.0x10-6 probability r 6: rmi. (a)010502 ( ), (b)072005,, ( ), (c)136812 ( ), (d)171408 ( ).,.,., (#21-5341).., Thomas Lux., Dirk Helbing. A EM Poisson EM. Gm(z) Km Fmi(z) (m = 1,..., Km). Fmi(z) = (Mrmi)z Gm(z) = Km z! (d) e Mrmi, (i = 1,..., Km) (15) amifmi(z). (16) 10 35000 mean of rates per night [JPY] 30000 25000 20000 15000 10000 5000 1.0x10-6 2.0x10-6 3.0x10-6 4.0x10-6 probability r] 28000 mean of rates per night [JPY] 26000 24000 22000 20000 18000 16000 (a) 14000 5.0x10-7 1.0x10-6 1.5x10-6 probability r (b) mean of rates per night [JPY] mean of rates per night [JPY]

a mi,. K m a mi = 1. (17) T {z m (t)} a mi, r mi (i = 1,..., K m ). L m (a m1,..., a mr, r m1,..., r mkm ) =. (15) (17) (18),. (K m 1 log (Mr mi ) z m(t) K m 1 a mi e Mr mi + (1 z m (t)! ( log G m zm (t) ). (18) L m (a m1,..., a mkm, r m1,..., r mkm ) = (19) a mi r mi a mi ) (Mr mk m ) z m(t) e Mr mk z m (t)! ). (19) L m a mi = L m r mi = L m r mkm = F mi (z m (t)) F mk (z m (t)) G m (z m (t)) a mi F mi (z m (t)) ( zm (t) ) M G m (z m (t)) r mi (1 K m a mi)f K (z m (t)) ( zm (t) G m (z m (t)) (i = 1,..., K m 1), (20) r mk (i = 1,..., K m 1), (21) ) M. (22). a mi (20) i., a mi /T (23) F mi (z m (t)) G m (z m (t)) = T (i = 1,..., K m), (23) a mi = 1 T. (21) (22), a mi F mi (z m (t)) G m (z m (t)) (i = 1,..., K m ), (24) r mi = 1 M T z m(t) Fmi(zm(t)) G m (z m (t)) T F mi(z m(t)) G m (z m (t)) (i = 1,..., K m ). (25).,, {a (0) {r (0) mi } {a(ν) mi } and {r(ν) mi } a (ν+1) mi = 1 T r (ν+1) mi = 1 M a (ν) mi F (ν) mi (z m(t)) m (z m (t)) T z m(t) F (ν) mi (z m(t)) m (z m (t)) T F (ν) mi (zm(t)) m (z m(t)) mi }, (i = 1,..., K m ), (26) (i = 1,..., K m ), (27) 11

.,. F (ν) mi mi )z (Mr(ν) (z) = z! K m m (z) = a (ν) mi F (ν) mi e Mr(ν) mi, (28) (z), (29) [1] R. Law, Disintermediation of reservations, International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 21 (2009) 766-772. [2] : http://www.mlit.go.jp/kankocho/siryou/toukei/index. html. [3] W. Weidlich, Sociodynamics: A Systematic Approach to Mathematical Modelling in the Social Sciences, Taylor and Francis, London (2002). [4] S. Alfrano and T. Lux, A noise trader model as a generator of apparent financial power laws and long memory, Macroeconomic Dynamics, 11 (2007) 80 101. [5] G. Haag, and W. Weidlich, A stochastic theory of interregional migration, Geographical Analysis, 16 (1984) 331-357. [6] Sukbin Cha, Ken W. McCleary, and Muzaffer Uysal, Travel Motivations of Japanese Overseas Travelers: A Factor-Cluster Segmentation Approach, Journal of Travel Research, 34, (1995) 33 39. [7] A.-H. Sato, Patterns of Regional Travel Behavior: An Analysis of Japanese Hotel Reservation Data, International Review of Financial Analysis, in press. [8] V. Hasselblad, Estimation of Finite Mixtures of Distributions from the Exponential Family, Journal of the American Statistical Association, 64 (1969) 1459 1471. [9] A.P. Dempster, N.M. Laird, and D.B. Rubin, Maximum Likelihood from Incomplete Data via the EM Algorithm, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B, 39 (1977) 1 38. [10] Z. Liu, J. Almhana, V. Choulakian, R. McGorman, Online EM algorithm for mixture with application to internet traffic modeling, Computational Statistics and Data Analysis, 50 (2006) 1052 1071. [11] S.J. Finch, N.R. Mendell, H.C. Thode, Probabilistic measures of adequacy of a numerical search for a global maximum, Journal of the American Statistical Association, 84 (1989) 1020 1023. 12