-de jure de facto- classification de jure de facto IMF IMF 30 Johnston, IMF 1999 de facto Fear of Floating Fear of Floating middle 1 IMF

Similar documents
Abstract IFS IFS 135

18lacs.dvi

IMF http : // htm

GDPギャップと潜在成長率

高齢化とマクロ投資比率―国際パネルデータを用いた分析―

国際流動性に関する財政的側面について

1 1 1 [2000]

デフレの定義(最新版).PDF

財政赤字の経済分析:中長期的視点からの考察


橡motonishi.PDF


野村資本市場研究所|アジアの金融競争力(PDF)

6) 7) MBO management buy-out 2 necessity sufficiency ) 21

日本における財政政策のインパクトー1990年代のイベント・スタディー

PowerPoint プレゼンテーション

- March SCB -, -, -, -, -, -, -, -, -, -,,,,,, -, -, -, -,, -,,,, -,,,,,, - -,, -,, Survey of Current Business, July, Table (p. ), Oct, Table (p. ) S.

29 Short-time prediction of time series data for binary option trade

わが国銀行業の将来像― 預金通貨需要からのアプローチによるマクロ的サイズの検討―

中国の家計所得と消費構造に関する分析

Jeffrey Sachs Chang(1998) Steven Radelet and Jeffrey Sachs (1998) 1999 IMF 1999 World Bank 1998 [ 1998 ] 2000 p [ 20

OECD Benartzi and Thaler Brown et al. Mottla and Utkus Rooiji et al. Atkinson et al. MacFarland et al. Elton et al. Tang et al. Benartzi and Thaler Br

SNAと家計調査における貯蓄率の乖離-日本の貯蓄率低下の要因-


中国引き締め策の対外的影響

デフレ不況下の金融政策をめぐる政治過程

OECD INVEST JAPAN jp/ij/index.htm

第2章 経済成長と所得分配: マレーシアの事例を中心に

-February FRB BIS IMF BIS Spillover Spillovers BIS IMF EMEs

アジアの資本移動の変化に関するクラスター分析 アジア域内の証券投資活性化に向けて

はじめに

Psacharopulos Psacharopulos and Patrinos (1) Byron and Takahashi McMahon and Boediono Duflo (2)

(1) (Karlan, 2004) (1) (1973) (1978) (1991) (1991) 1

ボーナス制度と家計貯蓄率-サーベイ・データによる再検証-

Microsoft Word - Šv”|“Å‘I.DOC

ルーカス型総供給方程式の批判的吟味

物価変動の決定要因について ― 需給ギャップと物価変動の関係の国際比較を中心に―


日本の高齢者世帯の貯蓄行動に関する実証分析

復活だぁっ! 日本の不況と流動性トラップの逆襲

PDFŠpŒ{Ł¶

74-2 岩間

産業・企業レベルデータで見た日本の経済成長.pdf

日本の世帯属性別貯蓄率の動向について:アップデートと考察

目次はじめに 1. 為替相場改革の概要と改革後のチャット相場 今後の為替相場 為替相場の安定性向上に向けた取り組み おわりに はじめに a 211 RIM 214 Vol.14 No.52 41

untitled

Association of South East Asian Nations: ASEAN ASEAN ASEAN ASEAN ASEAN ASEAN ASEAN

untitled

46−ª3�=4�“ƒ‚S“·‚Ö‡¦


第6章 ベネズエラの石油産業

和RIM28_向山氏.indd

untitled

財政のサステナビリティと長期金利の動向

Winter 図 1 図 OECD OECD OECD OECD 2003

和RIMNo.22高安氏.indd

Title ベンチャー企業の研究開発支出の決定要因 日本と台湾の事例を中心に Author(s) 蘇, 顯揚 Citation 經濟論叢 (1996), 158(1): Issue Date URL Right

untitled

03.™ƒ−ÔŁñ“’

遺産相続、学歴及び退職金の決定要因に関する実証分析 『家族関係、就労、退職金及び教育・資産の世代間移転に関する世帯アンケート調査』

[1987][2000] Awareness

Ver. 1.0 (discretion) (revenue management) (fictitious revenue recognition) (window dressing) (fraudulent accounting practice) SEC (General

untitled

戦間期日本企業の資金調達、資本コスト、資本構成:最適資本構成理論からみた1930年代における企業財務

1990年代以降の日本の経済変動

表紙_目次.PDF

Winter 2009 No Lower Earnings Limit

_16_.indd

untitled

A5 PDF.pwd

_03.indd

税制改正にともなう家計の所得弾性値 : 高齢者パネルデータによる実証分析

Salesforce DX.key

untitled

橡

公務員人件費のシミュレーション分析

Microsoft Word 年06月月次データ_総合


- March


通し組/F7:論説:西垣鳴人(送り)

ŒÚ”ŁŠp.qx


p *2 DSGEDynamic Stochastic General Equilibrium New Keynesian *2 2

村本 孜51‐85/51‐85

A4_

M&A の経済分析:M&A はなぜ増加したのか

ミレニアム開発目標の現状と課題

headquarter Gertner et al. winner-picking Wal-Mart s

60 Vol. 44 No. 1 2 準市場 化の制度的枠組み: 英国 教育改革法 1988 の例 Education Reform Act a School Performance Tables LEA 4 LEA LEA 3

南原

WEO guidline Japanese OAP

円借款案件・事後評価報告書1999(全文・上巻)

国際文化20号.indd


untitled


<95DB8C9288E397C389C88A E696E6462>

Coulibaly & Fontagné Finger & Kreinin 1979 Lee Coulibaly & Fontagné 2004 Coulibaly & Fontagné distance 4 i

[1964] [1957] Core Peripheral 7 Mangan,John[2000] [1999] [1999]pp7-8 5 [1964]p89 6 Doeringer and

Transcription:

-de jure de facto- classification de jure de facto IMF IMF 30 Johnston, 1999 1975 82 IMF 1999 de facto Fear of Floating Fear of Floating middle 1 IMF 2003 (with no separate legal tender) 41 7 (Other conventional fixed peg arrangements) 41 within horizontal bands 2 4 flexibility (Crawling pegs) 5 (Crawling bands) 5 (managed floating) 3 50 (independent floating) 34 < >IMF, Annual Report on Exchange Arrangements and Exchange Restrictions 2004 1 fischer(2001) hollowing out of the middle 2 ERM 3 1

classification de jure de facto De facto <Reinhart and Rogoff(2004)> 1940 IMF natural classification freely falling regimes 40 14 4 IMF limited flexibility < Levy-Yatati, and Sturzenegger LYS(2003)> 1974 183 LYS e e r de facto 1 LYS De Facto Flexible High High Low Intermediate Medium Medium Medium Fixed Low Low High Inconclusive Low Low Low LYS (de facto) Regime All Industrial Non-industrial IMF (de jure) Float 662 207 454 505 Intermediate 600 95 503 844 Fixed 1,029 141 886 942 Total 2,291 443 1,843 2,291 < > Levy-Yatati, and Sturzenegger(2003), p.1175 4 peg 5 80 1% crawling peg 2

1940-72 1973-89 90-2001 91 freely floating SDR CIS 599 85 44 98 18 option rigidity (real) (nominal) 6 (terms of trade) 7 5 6 7 Barro and Gordon,1983 3

flexibility ex. fear of floating fear of floating 8 OCA Mundell,1961 Kenen,1969, McKinnon,1963 9 Rogoff et al.(2004) Rogoff 10Dual exchange rates Ghosh, Gulde and Wolf(2002) 11 1-2 flexibility fear of floating 12 8 Dutch disease 9 10 rogoff et al G3 11 GGW GGW 12 4

GDP 13 14 80 90 LYS (2003) GDP (INVGDP) (TT) IMF(De jure) De facto LOLR (original sin) Eichengreen and Hausmann,1999 2 13 14 5

credibility 90 < > Bordo, Michael D.(2003), Exchange rate regime choice in historical perspective, Working Paper9654,NBER. Broda, Christian(2001), Coping with Term-of-Trade Shocks: Pegs versus Floats, American Economic Review Vol.91 No.2 BubulaAndrea and Otker-robe, Inci(2003), Are Pegged and Intermediate Exchange Rate Regimes More Crises Prone?, IMF Working Paper WP/3/223 Frankel, Jeffrey A.(2003), Experience of and Lessons from Exchange Rate Regimes in Emerging Economics Ghosh, Atish R., Gulde, Anne-Marie, and Wolf, Holger C.(2002), Exchange Rate Regimes: Choices and Consequences The MIT Press Fischer, Stanley(2001), Exchange Rate Regimes: Is the Bipolar View Correct? http://www.imf.org/external/np/speeches/2001/010601a.htm Johnston, Barry R.(1999), Exchange Rate Arrangements and Currency Convertibility Developments and Issues, IMF World Economic and Financial Surveys Levy-Yatati, Eduardo and Sturzenegger, Federico(2003), To float or to Fix: Evidence on the Impact of Exchange Rate Regimes on Growth, American Economic Review Vol.93 Reinhart, Carmen M. and Rogoff, Kenneth S.(2004), The Modern History of Exchange Rate Arrangements: A Reinterpretation, The Quarterly Journal of Economics Rogoff, Kenneth S., Husain, Aasim M., Mody, Ashoka, Brooks Robin, and Oomes Nienke(2004), Evolution and Performance of Exchange Rate Regimes, IMF Occasional Paper 229 6

IMF 1998 1999 IMF IMF, IFS Annual Report on Exchange Arrangements and Exchange Restrictions 7

Ghosh, Gulde, and Wolf IMF1999, 2003b; Bubula Levy-Yeyati and Reinhart and Rogoff 2003 and Ötker-Robe2002 Sturzenegger2003 2004 1973-99 1990 1974-2000 1940-2001 165 190 156 153 25, 9 15, 8 4 14, 5 dual/parallel exchange rate IMF IMF freely falling IMF Rogoff et al(2004)p.15 8

1970-99 Peg Limited Managed Flexibility Floating Floating Falling Total Pegged 17.9 9.6 14.2 24.5 391.7 12.4 33.9 (6.8) (7.9) (10.4) (23.2) (39.9) (6.5) (7.9) Intermediate 11.2 13.0 16.7 9.2 147.6 25.7 36.0 (3.5) (9.1) (15.1) (3.8) (66.1) (15.9) (10.8) Floating 20.3 10.1 11.3 8.1 408.9 445.6 138.5 (11.5) (7.5) (8.4) (4.5) (68.6) (22.2) (10.8) Total 17.1 11.1 14.2 9.9 305.3 55.5 49.7 (6.5) (8.3) (10.8) (4.8) (57.0) < >Rogoff et al(2004),pp.26-28 (7.6) (8.7) GDP 1970-99 Limited Managed Peg Flexibility Floating Floating Falling Total Pegged 2.0 2.6 1.6-3.2-1.1 1.0 1.6 (2.0) (2.6) (1.6) (0.5) (-0.7) (0.6) (1.6) Intermediate 2.8 2.6 1.9 2.7 0.0 2.7 2.1 (2.4) (2.9) (2.1) (2.2) (0.4) (2.7) (2.3) Floating 3.6 1.7 1.6 2.2-3.1-1.6 0.6 (2.9) (1.8) (2.2) (2.3) (-1.2) (-0.3) (1.7) Total 2.1 2.4 1.7 1.8-1.3 0.8 1.5 (2.2) (2.6) (2.0) (2.0) (-0.6) (0.6) (1.8) < > 3 1970-2002 Limited Managed Peg Flexibility Floating Floating Falling Total Pegged 6.3 8.9 25.1 7.0 53.6 6.6 12.7 Intermediate 3.2 4.8 10.5 30.6 42.3 28.4 12.1 Floating 10.5 5.2 11.6 8.4 17.3 14.8 10.4 Total 5.6 6.1 17.9 13.7 37.0 9.2 12.0 < > 3 9

1990-2001 Hard peg regimes 7.14 0.41 0.29 0.44 Dollarization 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Currency union 5.61 0.40 0.00 0.45 Currency board 1.53 0.55 0.64 0.44 Intermediate regimes 72.96 1.30 1.21 1.36 Conventional fixed peg to a single currency 23.47 1.54 1.08 1.70 Conventional fixed peg to a basket 16.33 1.41 2.38 1.22 Horizontal band 11.22 1.26 1.19 1.47 Crawling peg 10.20 1.18 1.21 1.16 Forward looking crawling peg 3.57 1.18 1.81 0.38 Backward looking crawling peg 6.63 1.18 0.61 1.42 Crawling band 4.59 0.90 0.95 0.77 Forward looking crawling band 2.55 0.70 0.76 0.52 Backward looking crawling band 2.04 1.44 1.42 1.49 Tightly managed floating 7.14 1.04 0.99 1.09 Other floating regimes 19.90 0.72 0.52 0.88 Other managed floating 8.67 0.66 0.36 0.80 Independently floating 11.22 0.78 0.60 0.98 Memorandum items: 100.00 All pegged regimes 1 72.96 1.09 1.10 1.09 All floating regimes 2 27.04 0.79 0.61 0.92 Number of observations 19,853 19,853 7,485 12,368 Number of pressure episodes 196 196 68 128 Bubula and otker-robe(2003) p.13 10

Rogoff et al < > Rogoff et al(2004) pp.42-44 11

Rogoff et al Per Capita Volatility of Dependent Variable Inflation Real GDP Growth Real GDP Growth Classification De jure Natural De jure Natural De jule Natural Intermediate(de jure) 0.062(6.58)*** 0.000(-0.05) -0.001(-0.31) Floating(de jure) 0.062(5.31)*** 0.003(0.57) 0.008(3.11)*** Intermediate(natural) 0.016(2.11)*** 0.000(0.00) 0.005(1.19) 0.045(2.91)*** 0.004(0.47) 0.008(1.24) floating(natural) 0.218(13.51)*** -0.025(-3.67)*** 0.012(2.69)*** falling(natural) Money growth 0.0113(0.83) 0.132(1.05) Real GDP growth -0.958(-3.40) -0.555(-2.59) Investment ratio -0.083(-2.62)*** -0.090(-2.83)*** -0.019(-0.27) -0.012(-0.17) Trade openness 0.022(1.29) 0.027(1.90)* 0.025(2.47)** 0.029(2.94)*** 0.007(1.06) 0.008(1.22) Central turnover rate Terms-of-trade growth bank 0.048(3.34)*** 0.026(2.05)** -0.005(-0.25) 0.007(0.39) 0.030(2.09)** 0.026(1.83)* 0.019(2.02)** 0.019(2.02)** Average years of 0.002(-0.83) 0.002(-0.60) 0.004(0.93) 0.004(0.82) schooling Tax ratio 0.004(0.14) -0.006(-0.25) -0.010(-0.76) -0.005(-0.36) Government balance -0.361(-4.99)*** -0.239(-4.07)*** 0.008(0.25) 0.004(-0.11) -0.008(-0.40) -0.003(-0.16) Initial income income/u.s. -0.063(-2.51)** -0.064(-2.39)** -0.006(-0.40) -0.008(0.55) Population growth -0.275(-1.68)* -0.321(-1.90)* 0.123(1.02) 0.111(0.91) Population size 0.013(1.01) 0.015(1.07) Constant 0.366(7.72)*** 0.090(1.51) 0.091(2.14)** 0.093(2.07)** 0.032(3.72)*** 0.031(2.53)*** Observations 1,946 1,946 1,762 1,762 1,878 1,878 R-squared 0.58 0.70 0.29 0.31 0.26 0.26 () *10 **5 ***1% < Rogoff et al(2004), p.41 12

9 LYS () () () () () () IMF LYS LYS LYS IMF IMF Base-line Base-line (1) (2) INVGDP 10.01*** 9.83*** 7.06*** 10.36*** 10.29*** 7.73*** (1.74) (1.73) (3.07) (2.01) (2.12) (2.09) POPGR -0.28-0.35-0.56-0.30-0.34-0.30 (0.19) (0.19) (0.35) (0.22) (0.21) (0.21) GDP74-0.37*** -0.43*** -0.34*** -0.77** -0.38** -0.71*** (0.14) (0.13) (0.12) (0.38) (0.19) (0.24) SEC -0.07-0.05 2.11* 0.18-0.84 0.52 (1.07) (1.03) (1.11) (1.44) (1.40) (1.60) POP 0.19** 0.15 0.30 0.12 0.30** 0.26** (0.08) (0.08) (0.21) (0.09) (0.12) (0.11) GOV 1-1.03*** -0.92** 4.27** -0.98** -1.10** -3.57*** (0.37) (0.38) (2.11) (0.39) (0.49) (0.98) CIVIL -0.24* -0.24* -0.98*** -0.18-0.27-0.14 (0.14) (0.14) (0.23) (0.16) (0.20) (0.17) TT 0.50*** 0.50*** 0.52** 0.49*** 0.53*** 0.82*** (0.10) (0.10) (0.24) (0.11) (0.12) (0.13) OPENFR 0.55 0.85-0.49 1.16 1.33 0.23 (1.20) (1.26) (1.15) (1.62) (2.12) (1.19) SAFRICA -0.77-1.06** -1.12** -1.23-1.16* (0.50) (0.47) (0.51) (0.75) (0.61) LATAM -1.02*** -1.11*** -0.96** -1.50*** -0.72 (0.36) (0.35) (0.38) (0.57) (0.50) TRANS -0.57-1.37-1.41-0.68-6.25 (1.80) (1.70) (1.79) (2.45) (4.93) INT 0.54* -0.96*** -0.37-1.19*** (0.32) (0.33) (0.29) (0.45) FIX -0.28-0.78** 0.13-1.13*** -0.40-1.56** (0.43) (0.33) (0.29) (0.47) (0.50) (0.71) Observations 1,421 1,421 392 1,029 840 785 R 0.177 0.180 0.393 0.171 0.163 0.249 Levy-Yatati and Sturzenegger2003p.1,179 IMF(1)(2)de facto INT 13