2014 41 2 93 103 J-STAGE Advance Published Date:October 30,2014 Original Article サッカー選手のサーヴェイ的視点と 心的回転能力との関係 1 2 2 3 2 The Relationship between Survey View and Mental Rotation in Football Players Noriyuki Fujii 1, Hiroki Nakamoto 2, Sachi Ikudome 2, Satoshi Unenaka 3 and Shiro Mori 2 Abstract This study aimed to investigate whether individual differences in viewpoint (route or survey [bird s eye] view) while playing football are associated with mental rotation ability and domain-specificity. Seventeen varsity football players were assigned to Experienced and Non-Experienced survey view groups according to a questionnaire about their experiences with survey view while playing football. Three tasks were used to compare mental rotation and viewpoint switching ability between groups: a mental rotation task to assess the ability to operate upon visuospatial mental representations; a viewpoint switching task to assess the ability to switch viewpoint internally from route to survey view in response to non-domain-specific information (e.g., toys configuration); and the complex task to assess the ability to switch viewpoint from route to survey view in response to domain-specific information (e.g., players configuration) and to operate upon visuospatial mental representations. There were significant between-group differences in response time for the mental rotation and complex tasks, but not in response accuracy for any tasks. This indicates that the experienced survey view group could quickly operate upon mental representations and switch viewpoints from route to survey view, but only in a domain-specific environment. Therefore, individual differences in viewpoint when playing football are associated with mental rotation ability and viewpoint switching ability in response to domain-specific information. More specifically, mental rotation ability and viewpoint switching is contingent upon domain-specific information for the attainment of survey view during football gameplay. Key words: expertise, mental representation, mental rotation 1 448-8501 1 1 2 891-2393 1 3 891-2393 1 E-mail: nakamoto@nifs-k.ac.jp 1 Kariya city office 1-1 Touyou, Kariya, Aichi 448-8501 2 Faculty of Physical Education, National Institute of Fitness and Sports in Kanoya 1 Shiromizu, Kanoya, Kagoshima 891-2393 3 Graduate School of Physical Education, Doctor s Course, National Institute of Fitness and Sports in Kanoya 1 Shiromizu, Kanoya, Kagoshima 891-2393 Corresponding author: Hiroki Nakamoto 93
2014 41 2 Ⅰ 1998 1993 1994 2 Perrig and Kintsch, 1985; Taylor and Tversky, 1992 1 1 1998 1998 2002 1995 1984 2012 2004 Siegel and White 1975 3 McDonald and Pellegrino, 1993 Blajenkova et al., 2005 Ishikawa and Montello 2006 94
2010 Bryant 1982 Pazzaglia and De Beni, 2006 Ozel et al. 2002 Naito, 1994; Ozel et al., 2004 Kasahara et al. 2008 WAIS-R Sekiguchi et al., 2011 McPherson, 1993 Allard et al., 1980; Garland and Barry, 1990 Allard et al., 1980; Garland and Barry, 1990 3 1 3 95
2014 41 2 Ⅱ 1 4 17 8 21.5 0.76 13.1 2.03 9 19.8 0.93 12.2 2.64 2 8 6 9 1 8 6 9 8 2 1 Cooper and Shepard 1973 1 1 2 1 1 F L P R R 1 1 1 2 1 2 15.6 HP Probook 4510s J F 2 Shelton and Gabrieli 2002 Cooper and Shepard 1973 2 1 2 1 1 4 5 6 4 1 1 1 2 2 1 3 3 6 6 1 30m 40m 96
3 10 3 1 3 1.75 2 1 2 0 90 180 270 4 2 1 1 2 3 97
2014 41 2 3 1 50cm 3 3 5 30 1 2 5 30 2 5 40 4 10 2 80 20 1 5 3 4 2 98
5 2 3 2 4 2 4 2 Bonferroni SPSS IBM SPSS for windows 12.0 5 Ⅲ 1 4 4 2 3 2 F[2, 30]=134.30, p<.01, η 2 p =.90 2 p<.01 2 3 2 F[1, 15]=6.69, p<.05, η 2 p =.31 F [2, 30]=133.01, p<.01, η 2 p =.90 F[2, 30]=4.38, p<.05, η 2 p =.23 2 p<.01 p<.05 2 5 2 4 2 F[3, 45]=4.76, p<.01, η 2 p =.24 0 90 180 90 p<.05 180 p<.01 F[3, 45]=3.01, p<.05, 4 *p<.05 99
2014 41 2 η 2 p =.17 0 90 180 p<.01 5 2 4 2 F[1, 15]=6.56, p<.05, η 2 p =.30 F[3, 45]=10.63, p<.01, η 2 p =.42 0 3 p<.01 p<.05 Ⅳ 3 Ozel et al., 2002, 2004 Cooper and Shepard 1973 1 2 3 Ozel et al. 2004 0 180 5 5 *p<.05 100
0 i.e., Ozel et al., 2004 0 Allard et al., 1980; Chase and Simon, 1973; Garland and Barry, 1990 Allard et al., 1980; Chase and Simon, 1973; Garland and Barry, 1990 Shepard and Metzler, 1971 90 180 270 5 Levine et a1., 1982 Presson and Hazelrigg 1984 101
2014 41 2 Hegarty et al., 2006 Ozel et al. 2002 2004 Hegarty et al. 2006 Previc, 1998 Allard, F., Graham, S., and Paarsalu, M. L. (1980) Perception in sport: basketball. J Sport Psychol., 2: 14-21. 1998 49 215-238 2002 27 1-13 Blajenkova, O., Motes, M. A., and Kozhevnikov, M. (2005) Individual differences in the representations of novel environments. J Environ Psychol., 25: 97-109. Bryant, K. J. (1982) Personality correlates of sense of direction and geographical orientation. J Pers Soc Psychol., 43: 1318-1324. Chase, W. G. and Simon, H. A. (1973) Perception in chess. Cogn Psychol., 4: 55-81. Cooper, L. A. and Shepard, R. N. (1973) The time required to prepare for a rotated stimulus. Mem Cognit., 1: 246-250. 1995 57 19-24 Garland, J. D. and Barry, J. L. (1990) Sport expertise: the cognitive advantage. Percept Mot Skills., 70: 1295-1314. Hegarty, M., Montello, D. R., Richardson, A. E., Ishikawa, T., and Lovelace, K. (2006) Spatial abilities at different scales: Individual differences in aptitude-task 102
performance and spatial-layout learning. Intelligence, 34: 151-176. 1994 Ishikawa, T. and Mentello, D. R. (2006) Spatial knowledge acquisition from direct experience in the environment: Individual differences in the development of metric knowledge and the integration of separately learned places. Cognit Psychol., 52 (2) : 93-129. Kasahara, S., Mashiko, H., and Niwa, S. I. (2008) Superior performance in WAIS-R block design among top-level rugby players. Br J Sports Med., 42: 932-933. 1998 25 65-74 Levine, M., Jankovic, I. N., and Palij, M. (1982) Principles of spatial problem solving. J Exp Psychol Gen., 111: 157-175. McDonald, T. P. and Pellegrino, J. W. (1993) Psychological perspectives on spatial cognition. Garling, T. and Colledge, R. G (Eds.), Behavior and Environment, 47-87. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science Publishers. McPherson, S. L. (1993) Knowledge representation and decision-making in sport. In JL Starkes, F Allard (Eds.), Cognitive Issues in Motor Expertise (pp.159-188). Amsterdam: North-Holland. Naito, E. (1994) Controllability of motor imagery and transformation of visual imagery. Percept Mot Skills., 78: 479-487. 1984 28 287-297 2012 39 137-151 Ozel, S., Larue, J., and Molinaro, C. (2002) Relation between sport activity and mental rotation: comparison of three groups of subjects. Percept Mot Skills., 95: 1141-1154. Ozel, S., Larue, J., and Molinaro, C. (2004) Relation between sport and spatial imagery: comparison of three groups of participants. J Psychol., 138: 49-63. Pazzaglia, F. and De Beni R. (2006) Are people with high and low mental rotation abilities differently susceptible to the alignment effect? Perception, 35: 369-383. Perrig, W. and Kintsch, W. (1985) Propositional and situational representation of text. J Mem Lang., 24: 503-518. Presson, C. C. and Hazelrigg, M. D. (1984) Building spatial representation through primary and secondary learning. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn., 10: 716-722. Previc, F. H. (1998) The neuropsychology of 3-D space. Psychol Bull., 124: 123-164. Sekiguchi, A., Yokoyama, S., Kasahara, S., Yomogida, Y., Takeuchi, H., Ogawa, T., Taki, Y., Niwa, S., and Kawashima, R. (2011) Neural bases of a specific strategy for visuospatial processing in rugby players. Med Sci Sports Exerc., 43: 1857-1862. Shepard, R. N. and Metzler, J. (1971) Mental rotation of three-dimensional objects. Science, 171: 701-703. Shelton, A. L. and Gabrieli, J. D. (2002) Neural correlates of encoding space from route and survey perspectives. J Neurosci., 22: 2711-2717. Siegel, A. W. and White, S. H. (1975) The development of spatial representations of large-scale environments. Rees, H. W. (Ed.), Advances in child development and behavior, 10: 9-55. New York: Academic Press. 2004 51 107-114 Taylor, H. A. and Tversky, B. (1992) Spatial mental models derived from survey and route descriptions. J Mem Lang., 31: 261-292. 2010 34 79-82 2013.11.12 2014.3.14 103