02古郡氏李氏_a_4.indd



Similar documents

201609発達・教育臨床論コース

精神障害者

untitled

60 Vol. 44 No. 1 2 準市場 化の制度的枠組み: 英国 教育改革法 1988 の例 Education Reform Act a School Performance Tables LEA 4 LEA LEA 3


untitled


Title ベンチャー企業の研究開発支出の決定要因 日本と台湾の事例を中心に Author(s) 蘇, 顯揚 Citation 經濟論叢 (1996), 158(1): Issue Date URL Right

NPO p ontological security Giddens 1990:92

20/September/ (2007) (2007) Berger- ( 2000) Cinii 8 Sociological Abstracts relative deprivation ) *1 (2007) *2 2 4 δ Boudon-Kosaka

国際文化20号.indd

60.0% 40.0% 28.4% 31.7% 36.2% 43.0% 48.4% 50.5% 52.5% 20.0% 0.0%

ren

教育社会学会(180903d)

自殺の経済社会的要因に関する調査研究報告書

4703ALL01

_01野口.indd

a naturalistic b Midgley, N., 2011 Child Psychotherapy and Research - New Approaches, Emerging Findings Catty, J., 2011 Catty, 2011 b Catty 2011 Wren,

QOL Quality Of Lif a... b Fengler A & Goodrich N, 1979 QOL Quality Of Lif Zarit Zarit Zarit SH, Reever KE & Bach-Peterson J, 1980; Zarit SH & Zarit JM

Maynard Zimmerman Maynard & Zimmerman Maynard & Zimmerman Maynard & Zimmerman

05[和]_ [島田](責)山.indd

社会関係資本と外国人に対する寛容さに関する研究―JGSS-2008 の分析から―


DOUSHISYA-sports_R12339(高解像度).pdf

H1-H4_政経研究_51-3.ai

2) 3) 2) Ohkusa, 1996 ; 1999 ; Ohtake and Ohkusa, 1994 ; La Croix and A. Kawamura, Reject American Economic Review, Journal of Political Econom

@08460025ヨコ/伊東 217号

Juntendo Medical Journal

And Business

日本の高齢者世帯の貯蓄行動に関する実証分析

橡yaginuma.PDF

日本における結婚観の変化―JGSS累積データ を用いた分析―

Making Democracy Work Making Democracy Work

possibilism Development Projects Observed 5

JGSS-2000にみる有権者の政治意識

RTM RTM Risk terrain terrain RTM RTM 48

untitled


ミクロ・データによる家計行動分析: 将来不安と予備的貯蓄

2 251 Barrera, 1986; Barrera, e.g., Gottlieb, 1985 Wethington & Kessler 1986 r Cohen & Wills,


_16_.indd

表紙_目次.PDF

Core Ethics Vol. : Esping-Andersen = : : : ; : ; : abuse fraud Cohen [ ] : : -

公務員倫理問題への新アプローチ

2-栗原.TXT

? ( ) () ( [2] [3] [7] ) ( [4, 5] [1] ) (0) (0) ) 1995 SSM 2.4 MANOVA 2 ( 1) ( 2) ( 3) 1)

untitled

160_cov.indd

Walter et al. 2009: 1 Helleiner 1994 Strange 1971: Gilpin 1987: -65 Strange b, 1998c,

本組よこ/本組よこ_古川_P289-310

@081807ヨコ/石山玲子 209号

日本労働研究機構『IT活用企業についての実態調査』及び

政治参加としての自治・町内会参加者の実証分析

Ishi


情意要因が英語の読解力と会話力に及ぼす影響-JGSS-2008 のデータから-

, , % :

,788 7,123 5,384 4,915 4,908 4,927 4,895 4,919 4,936 4,927 4,897 5,010 5,008 1,456 1

untitled

132 Camerer (2003) Chen, Lakshminarayanan and Santos (2006) fmri ventral stiatum Fliessbach K., Weber B., Trautner P., Dohmen T., Sunde U., Elger C. E

Z...QXD (Page 1)

ワールド・ワイド 10‐2(P)/3.中尾


6

OECD Benartzi and Thaler Brown et al. Mottla and Utkus Rooiji et al. Atkinson et al. MacFarland et al. Elton et al. Tang et al. Benartzi and Thaler Br

e.g. Kubota 2011 Piller & Takahashi 2006 Kubota 2011 Piller & Takahashi 2006 Kubota 2011 Piller et al Heller 2003 Piller, Takahashi & Watanabe

Stepwise Chow Test * Chow Test Chow Test Stepwise Chow Test Stepwise Chow Test Stepwise Chow Test Riddell Riddell first step second step sub-step Step

04-p45-67cs5.indd

橡23山中麻里江.PDF

...

石井/石井

2 / 24

Winter 図 1 図 OECD OECD OECD OECD 2003

”Лï‡Æ™²“¸_‚æ4“ƒ__‘dflÅPDF‘‚‡«‘o‡µ.pdf

untitled


Hi-Stat Discussion Paper Series No.248 東京圏における 1990 年代以降の住み替え行動 住宅需要実態調査 を用いた Mixed Logit 分析 小林庸平行武憲史 March 2008 Hitotsubashi University Research Unit

橡同居選択における所得の影響(DP原稿).PDF

1 88

BB 報告書完成版_修正版) doc

Masanori Hashimoto Rene Fahr and Hilmar Schneider 1. Hashimoto, Masanori Fahr, Rene and Hilmar Schneider Hashimoto, Masanori 2004 Fahr

<90AD8DF489C88A D322E696E6462>


Preliminary Version Manning et al. (1986) Rand Health Insurance Experiment Manning et al. (1986) 3 Medicare Me

201/扉

わが国企業による資金調達方法の選択問題

(’Ó)”R

’lŁ¶Ÿ_‰ƒ52†\3(‡æ‡±)/2.’¼Œ{†E‘¼Œ{

02総福研-06_辻.indd

PREFACE This report contains data on degrees awarded at Jackson State University by academic discipline, educational level and gender for the years. A


はじめに

佐山七生.indd

農村生活改善大扉2002.5.1.PDF

15先端-14_平成15年度21世紀の科学と技術のパラダイムシフトの本質構造と機械工業に求められる対応に関する調査研究報告書


商学 66‐1☆/16.田口

Taro 議員関係09.PDF

Transcription:

55 2014

e.g2004 2005 2001 1980 101990 1

2 2002 2003 25,000 20038,000 2013 10 2013 1,787 21.623 4,302 1 HUD portal.hud. gov/.../huddoc?id=pih2013 15.pdf... 2 14 105

30,000 25,000 25,296 20,000 15,000 10,000 5,000 18,564 2004 2006 16,018 15,759 13,124 10,890 9,576 8,265 0 2003 749 616 531 495 384 315 304 254 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 52.1 20 2013 2,094 2,006 1,395 2012 37 1,336 362 323114 87 15 2007

3 20102007 2013 2002 3 2007 5,400

2003 200760 6425.7 55 5918.3 65 6916.6 60.6 57.5 60.0 33.5 49.838.2 2012 1999200120012002 2002 4 66.9 13.0 2.4 4.0 2012 1026.0 10 4 1999 2001 2001 2002 2002

20.210 21.6 77.7 9.0 34.8 30.8 10 15.1 62 50 2007 40 50 2010 32.3 2011

46.2 14.5 2012 42.0 25.8 24.0 34.0 27.1 19.8 16.9 2007 36 27 2005 Main 1983 Eagle and Caton 1990

Elliot and Krivo 1991, Anderson 2007 Lipton et al. 1983, Fischer et al. 1986, Bassuk 1984, Early 2005, Anderson 2007, Anderson et al. 2003 Hecht and Coyle 2001, Crane and Warnes 2001 Bassuk 1984 Gilderbloom and Appelbaum 1988 Rossi et al. 1987 5 5 Elliott and Krivo 1991

Lee et al. 1992 Elliot and Krivo 1991 Quigley et al. 2001, O Flaherty 1996 Warnes and Crane 2006 Fitzpatrick et al. 2000 Tucker 1987 Appelbaum et al. 1989 Quigley 1990

Suzuki 2008 IT IT 20001990 2007 1997 685 2010 180

2000 Aoki 2003 1980 2010 67.2 40

2012 2011 56.8 23 2007 2008 Burt and Cohen 1989 1,000 22 Roth and Bean 1986 20072010

H it+1 L it X it it i 1, 2,... 47 t 2007 2008 2009 3.3 2007 0.072 10.365 3.679 6.036 4,444.021 96.894 0.106 5.775 0.981 1.257 1,027.023 113.596 0.005 2.280 2.200 3.400 3,067.000 16.360 0.556 25.700 7.400 9.600 9,296.000 512.390 2008 0.062 10.722 3.894 5.206 4,380.043 98.527 0.087 5.961 0.884 0.908 947.243 115.204 0.001 2.370 2.700 3.500 3,271.000 16.420 0.490 26.480 7.400 7.300 9,059.000 520.600 2009 0.061 11.797 4.806 4.321 4,369.000 100.239 0.087 6.340 0.820 0.885 949.866 116.978 0.005 2.670 3.500 2.600 3,232.000 16.710 0.486 29.360 7.500 6.300 9,031.000 533.490 2010 0.049 12.954 4.781 5.096 4,357.234 101.217 0.069 6.734 0.840 1.133 949.298 118.384 0.001 3.000 3.200 2.800 3,251.000 16.800 0.377 32.030 7.500 7.400 9,002.000 544.150 47 47 47 47 47 47

H it+1 i t 1L it i t X it 0.5 2007 2009 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.1 0 2 4 6 8 e-stat

2002 5.420073.9 20072009 0.25 0.26 0.5 2007 2009 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.1 0 2 4 6 8 10

10 0.0071 0.0029 0.0028 0.0014 0.0154 0.0050 0.0000 0.0000 0.0017 0.0006 0.3569 0.0702 141 47 10

0.37 30 100km 2 20 10 0 0 200 400 600 100km 2

24 2013 850 6 6

0.7625 0.1730 0.2611 0.1052 0.0001 0.0002 0.1625 0.0484 6.5662 4.5630 141 47 10

2012 2011 2012 2009 2011 2004 528 2001

2005 27 125 141 2009 45 Anderson, I. and L. Christian (2003), Causes of Homelessness in the UK : A Dynamic Analysis, Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology, 13, 105 118. Anderson, I. (2007), Tackling street homelessness in Scotland : The evolution and impact of the Rough Sleepers Initiative, Journal of Social Issues, 63, 625 642. Aoki, H. (2003), Homelessness in Osaka : Globalization, Yoseba, And Disemployment, Urban Studies, 40 (2), 361 78. Appelbaum, R.P. et al. (1989), Scapegoating Rent Control : Masking the Causes of Homelessness, Washington, D. C., Economic Policy Institute. Bassuk, E.L. (1984), The Homelessness Problem, Scientific American, 251, 40 45. Burt, M.R. and B.E. Cohen (1989), Differences among Homeless Single Women, Women with Children, and Single Men, Social Problems, 36 (5), 508 524. Crane, M. and A. Warnes (2001), Older People and Homelessness : Prevalence and Causes, Topics in Geriatric Rehabilitation, 16, 1 14. Eagle, P.F, and C. Caton (1990), Homelessness and Mental Illness, 59 75, in Homeless in America, edited by C. Caton, Oxford University Press. Early, D.W. (2005), An Empirical Investigation of the Determinants of Street Homelessness, Journal of Housing Economics, 13. 27 47. Elliot, M. and L. Krivo (1991), Structural Determinants of Homelessness in the United States, Social Problems, 38, 113 131. Fischer, P. J. et al. (1986), Mental health and social characteristics of the homeless : a survey of mission users, American Journal of Public Health, 76 (5), 519 524. Fitzpatrick, S. P. Kemp and S. Klinker (2000), Single Homeless : An Overview of Research in Britain, Policy Press. Gilderbloom, J.I. and R.P. Appelbaum (1988), Rethinking Rental Housing, Temple University Press. Hecht, L. and B. Coyle (2001), Elderly Homeless : A Comparison of Older and Younger Adult Emergency Shelter Seekers in Bakersfield, California, American Behavioral Scientist, 45, 66 7. Lee, B.A., D.W. Lewis and S.H. Jones (1992), Are the homeless to blame? A Test of

Two Theories, The Sociological Quarterly, 33 (4), 535 552. Lipton, F.R., A. Sabatini and S.E. Katz (1983), Down and Out in the City : the Homeless Mentally Ill, Hospital and Community Psychiatry, 34, 817 821. Main, T.J. (1983), The Homeless of New York, Public Interest, 72, 3 28. O Flaherty, B. (1996), Making Room : The Economics of Homelessness, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA. Quigley, J.M. (1990), Does Rent Control cause Homelessness? : Taking the Claim Seriously, Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 9, 88 93. Quigley, J.M., S. Raphael and E Smolensky (2001), Homeless in America, Homeless in California, The Review of Economics and Statistics, 83 (1), 37 51. Rossi, P.H. et al. (1987), The Urban Homeless : Estimating Composition and Size, Science, 235, 1336 1341. Roth, D. and G.J. Bean (1986), New Perspectives on Homelessness : Findings from a Statewide Epidemiological Study, Hospital Community Psychiatry, 37, 712 719. Suzuki, W. (2008), What determines the spatial distribution of homeless people in Japan? Applied Economics Letters, 15, 1023 1026. Tucker, W. (1987), Where Do the Homeless Come From?, National Review, 39, 32 43. Warnes, A. and M. Crane (2006), The causes of Homelessness Among Older People in England, Housing Studies, 21 (3), 401 421.