構造工学シンポジウム特別講演_本城_ PDF

Similar documents

JIS Z 9001:1998JIS Z 9002:1998 ISO/IEC 17025ISO/IEC Guide 25

Taro12-認定-部門-ASG101-06

Japanese.PDF

5005-toku3.indd

, ()


目標安全レベル達成を指向する次世代の船舶安全基準のあり方 ー GBS (Goal Based Standard) by SLA (Safety Level Approach) ー

2

SOME CONSIDERATIONS ON STRUCTURAL DESIGN BASED ON SECOND-MOMENT THEORY By Naruhito SHIRAISHI, Hitoshi FUR UTA and Masanori NAKANO

No.19 社団法人

untitled


研究レポート表紙.PDF



SEJulyMs更新V7

Table 1. Assumed performance of a water electrol ysis plant. Fig. 1. Structure of a proposed power generation system utilizing waste heat from factori

Steel Construction Engineering Vol.3 No.12(December 1996)

7章 構造物の応答値の算定

紙2003


平成13年度事業報告

SI SI CIPM MRA

356 Nippon Shokuhin Kagaku Kogaku Kaishi Vol. /., No.1, -/0-0+ (,**1) 44 For Quality Control and Quality Assurance in Food Analysis Akemi Yasui Analyt

陸域環境研究センター

VHDL-AMS Department of Electrical Engineering, Doshisha University, Tatara, Kyotanabe, Kyoto, Japan TOYOTA Motor Corporation, Susono, Shizuok


Study on Fracture Strength Assessment (The 1st Report) Comparison of JWES approach and R6 approach by Susumu Machida, Member Yukito Hagiwara, Member H

本文/YAZ172P

JAB NF01 REV JIS Q 17025: /

機械指令 2006/42/EC への適合のためのガイド (第2版)

<4D F736F F D B B83578B6594BB2D834A836F815B82D082C88C60202E646F63>

08_中嶋真美.indd

2. IEC61508 ISO WD IEC6150 SIL( Safety Integrity Level ) ISO WD2626 ASIL( Automotive Safety Integrity Level ) SIL/ASIL (tolerable risk) (Residu

MRA CIPM-MRA Mutual Recognition Arrangement OIML-MAA Mutual Acceptance Arrangement ILAC-MRA 3 CIPM-MRA (Associate to CGPM)+2 (As o

Stepwise Chow Test * Chow Test Chow Test Stepwise Chow Test Stepwise Chow Test Stepwise Chow Test Riddell Riddell first step second step sub-step Step

IFAC International Auditing Practice Committee Issued by the International Federation of Accountants

2-工業会活動.indd

0-表紙

関西福祉大学紀要 12号(P)/1.太田

IFRS Business Model IASB 2010b, Purpose and status, a and b IASB IFRS IFRS IFRS IASB IFRS IFRS Principles-Based Standard Tweedie 2007 Tweedie 2007, p.

Hansen 1 2, Skinner 5, Augustinus 6, Harvey 7 Windle 8 Pels 9 1 Skinner 5 Augustinus 6 Pels 9 NL Harvey ML 11 NL

ISO/IEC ISO/IEC 17020: 2012 JIS Q ILAC 2) ILAC P15:06/2014 Application of ISO/IEC 17020:2012 for the Accreditation of Inspection Bodies 20

10_08.dvi

EURAMET EURAMET/cg-15/v.01 "Guidelines on the Calibration of Digital Multimeters" EURAMET e.v. "General Conditions for the translation of EURAMET publ

untitled

149 (Newell [5]) Newell [5], [1], [1], [11] Li,Ryu, and Song [2], [11] Li,Ryu, and Song [2], [1] 1) 2) ( ) ( ) 3) T : 2 a : 3 a 1 :

Ł\”ƒ1PDFŠp


Unknown

Information Security Management System ISMS Copyright JIPDEC ISMS,

Present Situation and Problems on Aseismic Design of Pile Foundation By H. Hokugo, F. Ohsugi, A. Omika, S. Nomura, Y. Fukuda Concrete Journal, Vol. 29

possibilism Development Projects Observed 5

第 55 回自動制御連合講演会 2012 年 11 月 17 日,18 日京都大学 1K403 ( ) Interpolation for the Gas Source Detection using the Parameter Estimation in a Sensor Network S. T

bosai-2002.dvi

202

公務員倫理問題への新アプローチ

untitled

206“ƒŁ\”ƒ-fl_“H„¤‰ZŁñ


( ) SSID)


杉山俊幸著山梨大学大学院医学工学総合研究部環境社会創生工学専攻 工期短縮 建設コスト縮減 性能を明示することによる国際化対応を目指す性能照査型設計の導入が, 景気の低迷に伴う建設投資額の縮減という経済的な動向を見据えながら積極的に検討され,2002 年 3 月に発刊された現行道路橋示方書では 従来の


T - Telecommunication and Internet Protocol Harmonization Over Networks (TIPHON); Service and Network Management Framework; Part 1: Overview and Intro

final.indd

untitled

pp Dimensional Change Card Sort ****** ** Zelazo, P. D., Carter, A., Reznick, J. S. & Frye, D Zelaz

2-工業会活動.indd

EC・GMO事件

Web Stamps 96 KJ Stamps Web Vol 8, No 1, 2004


Densely populated wooden house areas are designated by Tokyo Metropolitan Government (from No.1 to No.28) Tokyo business district i (financial distric

KII, Masanobu Vol.7 No Spring

A5 PDF.pwd


520

第5章 処分事業の概要

Editor-in-chief Vice-Editors-in-chief Standing Editors Editorial Board Koichi MIYOSHI Keiko NISHINO Shunichi FURUKAWA Hiromitsu MUTA Kiyoshi YAMAYA Ed


73-5 大友

スライド 1

vp

PowerPoint

<4D F736F F D DB82CC88F892A38BAD937893C190AB76355F8D5A897B8CE3325F2E646F63>

A Study on Throw Simulation for Baseball Pitching Machine with Rollers and Its Optimization Shinobu SAKAI*5, Yuichiro KITAGAWA, Ryo KANAI and Juhachi

yasi10.dvi

untitled

64-5 増山裕一.pwd

PowerPoint プレゼンテーション

パナソニック技報

DPA,, ShareLog 3) 4) 2.2 Strino Strino STRain-based user Interface with tacticle of elastic Natural ObjectsStrino 1 Strino ) PC Log-Log (2007 6)


Microsoft PowerPoint - DO-178C満たすべきObjectivesとツール資格A.pptx

橡表紙参照.PDF

長岡慎介  45‐78/45‐78

スライド 1

物価指数の計測誤差と品質調整手法:わが国CPIからの教訓

燃焼圧センサ

Transcription:

10 2 (2004) (JGS4001-2004) 21 1) code PLATFORM ver.1 2) 3)11) code PLATFORM ver.1 21 code PLATFORM ver.1-1

-2Vision2000-3

comprehensive design code ISO2394 16) Eurocode0 17) 2003 2),,,.,,,,,,.,.. ( WTO/TBT IT) 1 o o 1

o o o 2 o IT ISO o o 3 o o 4 o o ( ) 13-14 () 2 3 4 code PLATFORM ver. 1 2), 5) Principles, guidelines and terminologies for structural design code drafting grounded on the performance based design concept 1. 2. 3. code PLATFORM ver. 1 21 0 10

1. 2. 3. encourage 4. ISO239413822 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. performance based design 16. 21 2 17. code PLATFORM ver. 1 5 1997 1997 3 1990 1995 TBT single voice 21 8) 9) 2000 21 1 21 0 6 7 0 21 0. 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. A B B C D E F G H I

0 3 0 code PLATFORM ver. 1 3 21 ISO2394 Eurocodes 1 Eurocodes 21 A code for code writers( () / 1 AASHTO Nordic Code (Objectives), (Functional Requirements), (Performance Requirements) 3 1995TBT ISOEurocodes (= ) (= ) 2 21 ( ) A B2 (3 ) A ( ) A

21 A ( ) B ( ) 21 A code for code writers( ) AB B B 1 ( ) / 2 2 ISO2394 ( ) (2.4.3 5) ) REQ (REQuirement) (1) REQ (2) REQ (3) REQ ( ) ( ) ( ) (1) (2) (3)

(1) (2) (3) (1) (2) (3) (4) 21 5) 2.2.2 2.2.3 (1) state of the art (2) (3) (4) 3 ( ) 10 code PLATFORM ver.1 (JGS4001-2004) 21 15), 19), 20), 21) ( ) 5 code PLATFORM ver.1 5 http://www.jsce.or.jp/committee/st/kajuu/

18) (2004) C (JGS4001-2004). 19) (2007) 07-03pp.48-49. 20) Watabe, Y., M. Tanaka and Y. Kikuchi (2006): Soil parameters used in the new design code of port facilities in 1) (2004): Japan, New Generation Design Codes for Geotechnical (JGS4001-2004). Engineering Practice Taipei 2006 (eds. Lin M-L et al.), p.97-98 and in CD-ROM, World Scientific, Singpore. 2) (2003) () 21) (2007) Ver 1.0 403620071pp.27 3) (2000) 21 Ver.1,, Vol. 48, No.9, pp.17-20. 4) (2002) Vol.50,No.1,pp.1-3 5), (2003) code PLATFORM ver. 1, Vol. 5, JCOSSAR, pp. 881-888 6) (2003), Vol. 5, JCOSSAR, 7) (2004): Vol52, No.2, pp.17-20 8) (2004): Vol.52, No.12, pp.10-14. 9) (2004): 39 144pp. 10) Honjo, Y. and O. Kusakabe (2004): Some movements toward establishing comprehensive structural design codes in Japan: 'Geo-code 21' and 'code PLATFORM ver.1', Proc. of the 3rd Civil Engineering conference in the Asian region (CECAR), pp.217-220 (paper number T5-4), Seoul, Korea. 11) Honjo, Y., Y. Kikuchi, M. Suzuki, K. Tani and M. Shirato (2005): JGS Comprehensive Foundation Design Code: Geo-code 21, Proc. 16th ICSMGE, pp.2813-2816, Osaka. 12) CIB(1998): Final report of CIB task group 11: performance-based building codes, CIB(International Council for Building Research Studies and Documentation) Report Publication 206. 13) NKB(1978): Structure for building regulation, NKB report No.34, 1978. 14) SEAOC(1995): Vision 2000 - Performance based seismic engineering of buildings, Vision 2000 Committee, Final Report, 1995. 15) (2005): VI9 16) ISO(1998): International Standard ISO/FDIN 2394, General principles on reliability for structures. 17) CEN(1999): Draft EN 1990 Eurocode 0 Basis of design.

2003.3 ver.1.0 Principles, guidelines and terminologies for structural design code drafting founded on the performance based design concept ver.1.0 code PLATFORM ver.1.0

ISO2394 Eurocode0 2003 ISO2394

2

Definitions of terminologies---------------------------------------------------------- General terms---------------------------------------------------------------------- Terms on design methodology-------------------------------------- Terms on action and environmental influence-------------------------------- Terms on structural response, resistance, material property and geometrical quantity------------------------------------------------------------ Terms on performance assessment of existing structures------------------------- General--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Scope---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Framework of design code---------------------------------------- (Performance requirements of structures) ------------- (Objectives of structures) ------------------------------------------------------------------- (Performance requirements) --------------------------------------------------------- (Performance criteria)------------------------------------------------------------------ (Definitions)---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Limit states of structures----------------------------------- (Actions, environmental influences: magnitude and their combinations)------------------ (Time)------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ (Significance of structures)------------------------------------------ (Verification procedures) -------------------------------------------------------------------- (Allowable verification procedures)---------------------------------- (General)-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- (Designers) -------------------------------------------------------------------------- (Verification approach A) -------------------------------------------------- (Verification approach B)-------------------------------------------------- (Structural design report)----------------------------------------------------------

1 0) 1)ISO23943,1998 ISO2394 2) 2001.10 3) 2000.3 4) 2002.10 5)ISO13822,2001 ISO13822 (structure) 1) (structural element) 1) (structural system) 1) life, lifetime, life period 2) (life cycle) 1) quality 1 1 (reliability) 1) : (failure) 1) : (comprehensive design codes) 3)

(specific base design codes) 3) (specific design codes) 3) performance-based design 2) (performance based design codes) 3) specification-based design 2) pre-verified specification) 2) reliability based design 2) (target reliability level) 5) : limit state design 2) (partial safety factor design) (partial factors format) 1) : partial factors design procedure 3) 2

(material factor approach) 3) : (resistance factor approach) 3) : (design working life) 1) ( )(structural integrity) (structural robustness) 1) : (reliability class of structures) 1) : required performance matrix 2) (assessment) 1) : pre-evaluation post-evaluation objective performance requirement (performance criterion) 3

basic performance requirement 0) significance of structures 0) (serviceability) 1) : (limit states) 0) (ultimate limit state) 1) : : (serviceability limit state) 1) : (restorability limit state) ) : (irreversible limit state) 1) (reversible limit state) 1) : : verification 2) S RS R f (S, R) 1.0 (verification approach) 0) (verification approach ) 0) 4

design examination 0 accreditation certification ) (compliance) 1) (action) 1) (representative value of an action) 1) : (characteristic value of an action) 1) : (characteristic alue) 3, F d (design value of an action) 1) : (permanent action) 1) : (variable action) 1) (accidental action) 1) : : (fixed action) 1) : 5

(free action) 1) (static action) 1) (dynamic action) 1) : : : (bounded action) 1) : (unbounded action) 1) (combination value) 1) : : (frequent value) 1) : (quasi-permanent value) 1) (action combination) ) : : load combination (environmental influence) 1) : (reference period) 1) (design situation) 1) : : (persistent situation) 1) : (transient situation) (characteristic value of a material property) 1) : (characteristic values of a geometrical quantity) 1) : 6

(design value of a material property) 1) : M (design value of a geometrical quantity) 1) (conversion factor) 1) : : (conversion function) 1) : (fractile value) 4) : (design value) 3) : demand, response value Rcapacity, limit value of performance (statistical uncertainty) 1) (basic variable) 1) : : (primary basic variable) 1) (limit state function) 1) : : gg(x 1,X 2,,X n ) = 0 :g > 0 g < 0,(reliability index,) 1) : P f =- -1 (p f ) -1 (reliability element) 1) : (element reliability) 1) (system reliability) 1) : : (model) 1) : (model uncertainty) 1) : (assessment) 5) 7

(rehabilitation) 0) (upgrading) 0) (damage) 5) (deterioration) 5) (deterioration model) 5) (inspection) 5) (investigation) 5) (load testing) 5) (maintenance) 5) (monitoring) 5) (remaining working life) 5) 8

9 REQ( ) REC( ),. POS( )

10 REQ REQ REQ REQ REQ 1) 2) REQ 1) 2) 3) 4) 5) 6) REQ 1) 2) ( ) 3) 4) 5) 6)

11 ISO2394ISO13822 1) 2) 3) 4) 5) 6)

12 1),2) 3) 4) 5) 6)

13 REQ REQ REQ ex. 21 ISO2394

14 B A

15 REQ REC

16 REQ REC POS REC REC

17 REQ REQ REC REC REQ REC 2 3

18

19 REQ REC POS

20 REQ REQ REQ

21 REQ REQ REC 3 3 3(a) 3(b)(c)

(a) (b) (c) 22

23 REQ

24 REQ REQ

REQ REC 25

26 REQ REC REC REC REC REC

27 REQ REQ REC POS REC REC REQ ISO2394 ISO2394 ISO2394 (1998) Partial factors format ISO2394 Basic variables 7 Models Principles of probability-based design ISO2394 D Design based on experimental models Principles of reliability-based design Combination of actions and estimation of action values

28 REQ REQ REC REC REQ 1) 2) 3) 4) 5) 6) 7) 8) 9) 10) 11) 12)

1) ISOISO2394 General principles on reliability for structure 3 rd edition, 1998.6. 2) 2001.10. 3) ver.1, 2000.3. 4) 2002.10. 5) ISOISO13822 Bases for design of structures Assessment of existing structures, 1 st edition, 2001.12. 6) Vol.29-No.8 pp.17202001.8. 29