自然利子率について：理論整理と計測

金融政策の波及経路と政策手段

Krugman(988) Woodford(999) (2000) (2000) 4 rae-of-reurn dominance 405 4 406 (i) a 2 cash good credi good b King and Wolman(999) (ii) 407 3 4 90 (iii) (iv) 408 λ κ (2.8) π x π λ = x κ Svensson 999 sric

低金利環境下でのフィット向上を目指した最近のイールド･カーブ･モデル群

IMES DISCUSSION PAPER SERIES 低金利環境下でのフィット向上を目指した最近のイールド カーブ モデル群 ふじわらしげあき 藤原茂章 Discussio Paper No. 7-J- INSIUE FOR MONEARY AND ECONOMIC SUDIES BANK OF JAPAN 日本銀行金融研究所 3-866 日本橋郵便局私書箱 3 号 日本銀行金融研究所が刊行している論文等はホームページからダウンロードできます

医系の統計入門第 2 版 サンプルページ この本の定価 判型などは, 以下の URL からご覧いただけます. このサンプルページの内容は, 第 2 版 1 刷発行時のものです.

医系の統計入門第 2 版 サンプルページ この本の定価 判型などは, 以下の URL からご覧いただけます. http://www.morikita.co.jp/books/mid/009192 このサンプルページの内容は, 第 2 版 1 刷発行時のものです. i 2 t 1. 2. 3 2 3. 6 4. 7 5. n 2 ν 6. 2 7. 2003 ii 2 2013 10 iii 1987

O x y z O ( O ) O (O ) 3 x y z O O x v t = t = 0 ( 1 ) O t = 0 c t r = ct P (x, y, z) r 2 = x 2 + y 2 + z 2 (t, x, y, z) (ct) 2 x 2 y 2 z 2 = 0

9 O y O ( O ) O (O ) 3 y O O v t = t = 0 ( ) O t = 0 t r = t P (, y, ) r = + y + (t,, y, ) (t) y = 0 () ( )O O t (t ) y = 0 () (t) y = (t ) y = 0 (3) O O v O O v O O O y y O O v P(, y,, t) t (, y,, t )

# GDP 1 GDP 1992 GDP Hamilton and Flavin (1986) Doi and Ihori(2003) (2007) 2 Bohn(1998) /GDP Bohn # 1 2 Broda

# masaya@econ.keio.ac.jp GDP 1 GDP 1992 GDP 1 2006 Hamilon and Flavin (1986) Doi and Ihori(2003) 1965 2003 (2007) 2 Bohn(1998) /GDP Bohn # 1 2 Broda and Weinsein (2005) (2007) 1 Hamilon and Flavin(1986)

N cos s s cos ψ e e e e 3 3 e e 3 e 3 e

3 3 5 5 5 3 3 7 5 33 5 33 9 5 8 > e > f U f U u u > u ue u e u ue u ue u e u e u u e u u e u N cos s s cos ψ e e e e 3 3 e e 3 e 3 e 3 > A A > A E A f A A f A [ ] f A A e > > A e[ ] > f A E A < < f ; >

財政赤字の経済分析：中長期的視点からの考察

1998 1999 1998 1999 10 10 1999 30 (1982, 1996) (1997) (1977) (1990) (1996) (1997) (1996) Ihori, Doi, and Kondo (1999) (1982) (1984) (1987) (1993) (1997) (1998) CAPM 1980 (time inconsistency) Persson, Persson

本文／目次（裏白）

微分積分 サンプルページ この本の定価 判型などは, 以下の URL からご覧いただけます. このサンプルページの内容は, 初版 1 刷発行時のものです.

微分積分 サンプルページ この本の定価 判型などは, 以下の URL からご覧いただけます. ttp://www.morikita.co.jp/books/mid/00571 このサンプルページの内容は, 初版 1 刷発行時のものです. i ii 014 10 iii [note] 1 3 iv 4 5 3 6 4 x 0 sin x x 1 5 6 z = f(x, y) 1 y = f(x)

プログラム

TOP URL 1

TOP URL http://amonphys.web.fc.com/ 3.............................. 3.............................. 4.3 4................... 5.4........................ 6.5........................ 8.6...........................7

1990年代以降の日本の経済変動

1990 * kenichi.sakura@boj.or.jp ** hitoshi.sasaki@boj.or.jp *** masahiro.higo@boj.or.jp No.05-J-10 2005 12 103-8660 30 * ** *** 1990 2005 12 1990 1990 1990 2005 11 2425 BIS E-mail: kenichi.sakura@boj.or.jp

財政赤字の経済分析：中長期的視点からの考察

000 364 645 (ax smoohing (Barro(979 Barro(979 (consumpion smoohing Hall(978 Campbell(987 Barro(979 Hall(978 Campbell(987 Campbell(987 B ( r B G T ( ( r E B G T Y T/Y r ( No Ponzi Game ( [ Ω ] Y ( lim (

第86回日本感染症学会総会学術集会後抄録（I）

κ κ κ κ κ κ μ μ β β β γ α α β β γ α β α α α γ α β β γ μ β β μ μ α ββ β β β β β β β β β β β β β β β β β β γ β μ μ μ μμ μ μ μ μ β β μ μ μ μ μ μ μ μ μ μ μ μ μ μ β

02.„o“φiflì„㙃fic†j

X-12-ARIMA Band-PassDECOMP HP X-12-ARIMADECOMP HPBeveridge and Nelson DECOMP X-12-ARIMA Band-PassHodrick and PrescottHP DECOMPBeveridge and Nelson M CD X ARIMA DECOMP HP Band-PassDECOMP Kiyotaki and Moore

日本経済の変動要因：生産性ショックの役割

* miyao@rieb.kobe-u.ac.jp No.06-J-1 2006 1 103-8660 30 * * 2006 1 2 1 657-8501 Phone: +81-78-803-7014 Fax: +81-78-803-7059 Email: miyao@rieb.kobe-u.ac.jp [ ] GDP TFP 4 VAR TFP AD-AS VAR (i) GDP (ii)gdp

1 GDP 2 8 2 2

2013 11 29 1990 15 JEL C51, E12, E32, E62, O42, O53 1 2007 19 Borio (2012a), Galbraih (1994) 1990 1 20 1998 GDP 1998 2012 GDP 0.6 0.6 1 1930 Eggerson man (2012) and Krug 1 1 GDP 2 8 2 2 2005 2 1996 2007

, 1), 2) (Markov-Switching Vector Autoregression, MSVAR), 3) 3, ,, , TOPIX, , explosive. 2,.,,,.,, 1

2016 1 12 4 1 2016 1 12, 1), 2) (Markov-Switching Vector Autoregression, MSVAR), 3) 3, 1980 1990.,, 225 1986 4 1990 6, TOPIX,1986 5 1990 2, explosive. 2,.,,,.,, 1986 Q2 1990 Q2,,. :, explosive, recursiveadf,

: , 2.0, 3.0, 2.0, (%) ( 2.

2017 1 2 1.1...................................... 2 1.2......................................... 4 1.3........................................... 10 1.4................................. 14 1.5..........................................

IMES DISCUSSION PAPER SERIES LIBOR Discussion Paper No J- -J-2 INSTITUTE FOR MONETARY AND ECONOMIC STUDIES BANK OF JAPAN

IES DISCUSSION PAPER SERIES IBOR Dscusso Paper No. 00-J- -J- INSTITUTE FOR ONETARY AND ECONOIC STUDIES BANK OF JAPAN 03-8660 30 IES Dscusso Paper Seres 00-J- 00 IBOR * IBOR IBOR IBOR JE classfcao: C5

I A A441 : April 15, 2013 Version : 1.1 I Kawahira, Tomoki TA (Shigehiro, Yoshida )

I013 00-1 : April 15, 013 Version : 1.1 I Kawahira, Tomoki TA (Shigehiro, Yoshida) http://www.math.nagoya-u.ac.jp/~kawahira/courses/13s-tenbou.html pdf * 4 15 4 5 13 e πi = 1 5 0 5 7 3 4 6 3 6 10 6 17

マルコフ スイッチング GARCH モデルにおけるオプション価格の評価法 7 マルコフ スイッチング GARCH モデルにおけるオプション価格の評価法 里 吉清隆 要旨. はじめに. モデル.. マルコフ スイッチング GARCH モデル.. 投資家の危険中立性と収益率の定式化 3.MS-GARCH モデルの最尤法による推定法 3.. 尤度関数 3.. ハミルトン フィルタ 4. モンテカルロ シミュレーションによるオプション価格の評価法

st.dvi

9 3 5................................... 5............................. 5....................................... 5.................................. 7.........................................................................

shuron.dvi

01M3065 1 4 1.1........................... 4 1.2........................ 5 1.3........................ 6 2 8 2.1.......................... 8 2.2....................... 9 3 13 3.1.............................

基礎数学I

I & II ii ii........... 22................. 25 12............... 28.................. 28.................... 31............. 32.................. 34 3 1 9.................... 1....................... 1............

1 (Berry,1975) 2-6 p (S πr 2 )p πr 2 p 2πRγ p p = 2γ R (2.5).1-1 : : : : ( ).2 α, β α, β () X S = X X α X β (.1) 1 2

2005 9/8-11 2 2.2 ( 2-5) γ ( ) γ cos θ 2πr πρhr 2 g h = 2γ cos θ ρgr (2.1) γ = ρgrh (2.2) 2 cos θ θ cos θ = 1 (2.2) γ = 1 ρgrh (2.) 2 2. p p ρgh p ( ) p p = p ρgh (2.) h p p = 2γ r 1 1 (Berry,1975) 2-6

untitled

2007 2 * (i) (ii) 2006 7 1999 2 2000 8 1 (2003) Oda and Ueda (2005) 2005 Kimura and Small(2006) Iwamura, Shiratsuka and Watanabe (2006) (2006) 3 (i) (ii) (iii) 2 2 3 4 2.1 (2003) (2005) 1) (i) (ii) (i)

(Compton Scattering) Beaming 1 exp [i (k x ωt)] k λ k = 2π/λ ω = 2πν k = ω/c k x ωt ( ω ) k α c, k k x ωt η αβ k α x β diag( + ++) x β = (ct, x) O O x

Compton Scattering Beaming exp [i k x ωt] k λ k π/λ ω πν k ω/c k x ωt ω k α c, k k x ωt η αβ k α x β diag + ++ x β ct, x O O x O O v k α k α β, γ k γ k βk, k γ k + βk k γ k k, k γ k + βk 3 k k 4 k 3 k

日本内科学会雑誌第102巻第4号

, 1.,,,.,., (Lin, 1955).,.,.,.,. f, 2,. main.tex 2011/08/13( )

81 4 2 4.1, 1.,,,.,., (Lin, 1955).,.,.,.,. f, 2,. 82 4.2. ζ t + V (ζ + βy) = 0 (4.2.1), V = 0 (4.2.2). (4.2.1), (3.3.66) R 1 Φ / Z, Γ., F 1 ( 3.2 ). 7,., ( )., (4.2.1) 500 hpa., 500 hpa (4.2.1) 1949,.,

物価変動の決定要因について　― 需給ギャップと物価変動の関係の国際比較を中心に―

NAIRU NAIRU NAIRU GDPGDP NAIRUNon- Accelerating Inflation Rate of Unemployment GDP GDP NAIRU Lown and RichFisher, Mahadeva and Whitley raw materials G NAIRUTurnerFai WatanabeNAIRU Watanabe nested NAIRU

18 I ( ) (1) I-1,I-2,I-3 (2) (3) I-1 ( ) (100 ) θ ϕ θ ϕ m m l l θ ϕ θ ϕ 2 g (1) (2) 0 (3) θ ϕ (4) (3) θ(t) = A 1 cos(ω 1 t + α 1 ) + A 2 cos(ω 2 t + α

18 I ( ) (1) I-1,I-2,I-3 (2) (3) I-1 ( ) (100 ) θ ϕ θ ϕ m m l l θ ϕ θ ϕ 2 g (1) (2) 0 (3) θ ϕ (4) (3) θ(t) = A 1 cos(ω 1 t + α 1 ) + A 2 cos(ω 2 t + α 2 ), ϕ(t) = B 1 cos(ω 1 t + α 1 ) + B 2 cos(ω 2 t

II III II 1 III ( ) [2] [3] [1] 1 1:

2015 4 16 1. II III II 1 III () [2] [3] 2013 11 18 [1] 1 1: [5] [6] () [7] [1] [1] 1998 4 2008 8 2014 8 6 [1] [1] 2 3 4 5 2. 2.1. t Dt L DF t A t (2.1) A t = Dt L + Dt F (2.1) 3 2 1 2008 9 2008 8 2008

LLG-R8.Nisus.pdf

d M d t = γ M H + α M d M d t M γ [ 1/ ( Oe sec) ] α γ γ = gµ B h g g µ B h / π γ g = γ = 1.76 10 [ 7 1/ ( Oe sec) ] α α = λ γ λ λ λ α γ α α H α = γ H ω ω H α α H K K H K / M 1 1 > 0 α 1 M > 0 γ α γ =

y = x x R = 0. 9, R = σ $ = y x w = x y x x w = x y α ε = + β + x x x y α ε = + β + γ x + x x x x' = / x y' = y/ x y' =

y x = α + β + ε =,, ε V( ε) = E( ε ) = σ α $ $ β w ( 0) σ = w σ σ y α x ε = + β + w w w w ε / w ( w y x α β ) = α$ $ W = yw βwxw $β = W ( W) ( W)( W) w x x w x x y y = = x W y W x y x y xw = y W = w w

IMES DISCUSSION PAPER SERIES Discussion Paper No J INSTITUTE FOR MONETARY AND ECONOMIC STUDIES BANK OF JAPAN

IMES DISCUSSION PAPER SERIES Dscusso Paper No. 00-J-0 0 INSTITUTE FOR MONETARY AND ECONOMIC STUDIES BANK OF JAPAN 0-8660 0 IMES Dscusso Paper Seres 00-J- -J-0 00 GMM O/N LIBOR HJM LIBOR GMMHJM JEL classfcato:

4. ϵ(ν, T ) = c 4 u(ν, T ) ϵ(ν, T ) T ν π4 Planck dx = 0 e x 1 15 U(T ) x 3 U(T ) = σt 4 Stefan-Boltzmann σ 2π5 k 4 15c 2 h 3 = W m 2 K 4 5.

A 1. Boltzmann Planck u(ν, T )dν = 8πh ν 3 c 3 kt 1 dν h 6.63 10 34 J s Planck k 1.38 10 23 J K 1 Boltzmann u(ν, T ) T ν e hν c = 3 10 8 m s 1 2. Planck λ = c/ν Rayleigh-Jeans u(ν, T )dν = 8πν2 kt dν c

量子力学 問題

3 : 203 : 0. H = 0 0 2 6 0 () = 6, 2 = 2, 3 = 3 3 H 6 2 3 ϵ,2,3 (2) ψ = (, 2, 3 ) ψ Hψ H (3) P i = i i P P 2 = P 2 P 3 = P 3 P = O, P 2 i = P i (4) P + P 2 + P 3 = E 3 (5) i ϵ ip i H 0 0 (6) R = 0 0 [H,

液晶の物理１：連続体理論（弾性，粘性）

The Physics of Liquid Crystals P. G. de Gennes and J. Prost (Oxford University Press, 1993) Liquid crystals are beautiful and mysterious; I am fond of them for both reasons. My hope is that some readers

seminar0220a.dvi

1 Hi-Stat 2 16 2 20 16:30-18:00 2 2 217 1 COE 4 COE RA E-MAIL: ged0104@srv.cc.hit-u.ac.jp 2004 2 25 S-PLUS S-PLUS S-PLUS S-code 2 [8] [8] [8] 1 2 ARFIMA(p, d, q) FI(d) φ(l)(1 L) d x t = θ(l)ε t ({ε t }

Ł\”ƒ-2005

第90回日本感染症学会学術講演会抄録（I）

1. z dr er r sinθ dϕ eϕ r dθ eθ dr θ dr dθ r x 0 ϕ r sinθ dϕ r sinθ dϕ y dr dr er r dθ eθ r sinθ dϕ eϕ 2. (r, θ, φ) 2 dr 1 h r dr 1 e r h θ dθ 1 e θ h

IB IIA 1 1 r, θ, φ 1 (r, θ, φ)., r, θ, φ 0 r

TOP URL 1

TOP URL http://amonphys.web.fc2.com/ 1 30 3 30.1.............. 3 30.2........................... 4 30.3...................... 5 30.4........................ 6 30.5.................................. 8 30.6...............................

総研大恒星進化概要.dvi

The Structure and Evolution of Stars I. Basic Equations. M r r =4πr2 ρ () P r = GM rρ. r 2 (2) r: M r : P and ρ: G: M r Lagrange r = M r 4πr 2 rho ( ) P = GM r M r 4πr. 4 (2 ) s(ρ, P ) s(ρ, P ) r L r T

201711grade1ouyou.pdf

2017 11 26 1 2 52 3 12 13 22 23 32 33 42 3 5 3 4 90 5 6 A 1 2 Web Web 3 4 1 2... 5 6 7 7 44 8 9 1 2 3 1 p p >2 2 A 1 2 0.6 0.4 0.52... (a) 0.6 0.4...... B 1 2 0.8-0.2 0.52..... (b) 0.6 0.52.... 1 A B 2

No δs δs = r + δr r = δr (3) δs δs = r r = δr + u(r + δr, t) u(r, t) (4) δr = (δx, δy, δz) u i (r + δr, t) u i (r, t) = u i x j δx j (5) δs 2

No.2 1 2 2 δs δs = r + δr r = δr (3) δs δs = r r = δr + u(r + δr, t) u(r, t) (4) δr = (δx, δy, δz) u i (r + δr, t) u i (r, t) = u i δx j (5) δs 2 = δx i δx i + 2 u i δx i δx j = δs 2 + 2s ij δx i δx j

インフレの不確実性とインフレ率水準の関係

* ** Working Paper 00-0 00-863003 * ** * ** 3 4 5 96 8 ; How will we cenral bankers know when we have achieved price sabiliy? Cerainly we would deem our policies successful if we removed unproducive price-expecaion-driven

TOP URL 1

TOP URL http://amonphys.web.fc.com/ 1 19 3 19.1................... 3 19.............................. 4 19.3............................... 6 19.4.............................. 8 19.5.............................

2 G(k) e ikx = (ik) n x n n! n=0 (k ) ( ) X n = ( i) n n k n G(k) k=0 F (k) ln G(k) = ln e ikx n κ n F (k) = F (k) (ik) n n= n! κ n κ n = ( i) n n k n

. X {x, x 2, x 3,... x n } X X {, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6} X x i P i. 0 P i 2. n P i = 3. P (i ω) = i ω P i P 3 {x, x 2, x 3,... x n } ω P i = 6 X f(x) f(x) X n n f(x i )P i n x n i P i X n 2 G(k) e ikx = (ik) n

○松本委員

CIRJE-J-100 2003 11 CIRJE hp://www.e.u-okyo.ac.jp/cirje/research/03research02dp_j.hml Credi Risk Modeling Approaches 2003 11 17 Absrac This aricle originaes from a speech given by he auhor in he seminar

,. Black-Scholes u t t, x c u 0 t, x x u t t, x c u t, x x u t t, x + σ x u t, x + rx ut, x rux, t 0 x x,,.,. Step 3, 7,,, Step 6., Step 4,. Step 5,,.

9 α ν β Ξ ξ Γ γ o δ Π π ε ρ ζ Σ σ η τ Θ θ Υ υ ι Φ φ κ χ Λ λ Ψ ψ µ Ω ω Def, Prop, Th, Lem, Note, Remark, Ex,, Proof, R, N, Q, C [a, b {x R : a x b} : a, b {x R : a < x < b} : [a, b {x R : a x < b} : a,

II A A441 : October 02, 2014 Version : Kawahira, Tomoki TA (Kondo, Hirotaka )

II 214-1 : October 2, 214 Version : 1.1 Kawahira, Tomoki TA (Kondo, Hirotaka ) http://www.math.nagoya-u.ac.jp/~kawahira/courses/14w-biseki.html pdf 1 2 1 9 1 16 1 23 1 3 11 6 11 13 11 2 11 27 12 4 12 11

研究シリーズ第40号

165 PEN WPI CPI WAGE IIP Feige and Pearce 166 167 168 169 Vector Autoregression n (z) z z p p p zt = φ1zt 1 + φ2zt 2 + + φ pzt p + t Cov( 0 ε t, ε t j )= Σ for for j 0 j = 0 Cov( ε t, zt j ) = 0 j = >

(2004 ) 2 (A) (B) (C) 3 (1987) (1988) Shimono and Tachibanaki(1985) (2008) , % 2 (1999) (2005) 3 (2005) (2006) (2008)

,, 23 4 30 (i) (ii) (i) (ii) Negishi (1960) 2010 (2010) ( ) ( ) (2010) E-mail:fujii@econ.kobe-u.ac.jp E-mail:082e527e@stu.kobe-u.ac.jp E-mail:iritani@econ.kobe-u.ac.jp 1 1 16 (2004 ) 2 (A) (B) (C) 3 (1987)

デフォルト相関係数のインプライド推計（ ）

,,,.,.,.,,.,,.,,.,,. :,, OU, SUR,.,.,,.,.., 62 1, BIS,.,.,,,,.,,.,.,, [33],,,.,,.,,,,.,,.,,,.. 2,. 3,. 4,,. 5. 2,,.,. 2.1,.,,.,. Giesecke [10] dependen defaul.,,,, GDP,.,,.,...,,,.,.,.,,.,,. Giesecke [10],

QCD 1 QCD GeV 2014 QCD 2015 QCD SU(3) QCD A µ g µν QCD 1

QCD 1 QCD GeV 2014 QCD 2015 QCD SU(3) QCD A µ g µν QCD 1 (vierbein) QCD QCD 1 1: QCD QCD Γ ρ µν A µ R σ µνρ F µν g µν A µ Lagrangian gr TrFµν F µν No. Yes. Yes. No. No! Yes! [1] Nash & Sen [2] Riemann

2 1 1 α = a + bi(a, b R) α (conjugate) α = a bi α (absolute value) α = a 2 + b 2 α (norm) N(α) = a 2 + b 2 = αα = α 2 α (spure) (trace) 1 1. a R aα =

1 1 α = a + bi(a, b R) α (conjugate) α = a bi α (absolute value) α = a + b α (norm) N(α) = a + b = αα = α α (spure) (trace) 1 1. a R aα = aα. α = α 3. α + β = α + β 4. αβ = αβ 5. β 0 6. α = α ( ) α = α

1 Nelson-Siegel Nelson and Siegel(1987) 3 Nelson-Siegel 3 Nelson-Siegel 2 3 Nelson-Siegel 2 Nelson-Siegel Litterman and Scheinkman(199

Nelson-Siegel Nelson-Siegel 1992 2007 15 1 Nelson and Siegel(1987) 2 FF VAR 1996 FF B) 1 Nelson-Siegel 15 90 1 Nelson and Siegel(1987) 3 Nelson-Siegel 3 Nelson-Siegel 2 3 Nelson-Siegel 2 Nelson-Siegel

V(x) m e V 0 cos x π x π V(x) = x < π, x > π V 0 (i) x = 0 (V(x) V 0 (1 x 2 /2)) n n d 2 f dξ 2ξ d f 2 dξ + 2n f = 0 H n (ξ) (ii) H

199 1 1 199 1 1. Vx) m e V cos x π x π Vx) = x < π, x > π V i) x = Vx) V 1 x /)) n n d f dξ ξ d f dξ + n f = H n ξ) ii) H n ξ) = 1) n expξ ) dn dξ n exp ξ )) H n ξ)h m ξ) exp ξ )dξ = π n n!δ n,m x = Vx)

( ) ) ) ) 5) 1 J = σe 2 6) ) 9) 1955 Statistical-Mechanical Theory of Irreversible Processes )

( 3 7 4 ) 2 2 ) 8 2 954 2) 955 3) 5) J = σe 2 6) 955 7) 9) 955 Statistical-Mechanical Theory of Irreversible Processes 957 ) 3 4 2 A B H (t) = Ae iωt B(t) = B(ω)e iωt B(ω) = [ Φ R (ω) Φ R () ] iω Φ R (t)

chap10.dvi

. q {y j } I( ( L y j =Δy j = u j = C l ε j l = C(L ε j, {ε j } i.i.d.(,i q ( l= y O p ( {u j } q {C l } A l C l

.5 z = a + b + c n.6 = a sin t y = b cos t dy d a e e b e + e c e e e + e 3 s36 3 a + y = a, b > b 3 s363.7 y = + 3 y = + 3 s364.8 cos a 3 s365.9 y =,

[ ] IC. r, θ r, θ π, y y = 3 3 = r cos θ r sin θ D D = {, y ; y }, y D r, θ ep y yddy D D 9 s96. d y dt + 3dy + y = cos t dt t = y = e π + e π +. t = π y =.9 s6.3 d y d + dy d + y = y =, dy d = 3 a, b

QMII_10.dvi

65 1 1.1 1.1.1 1.1 H H () = E (), (1.1) H ν () = E ν () ν (). (1.) () () = δ, (1.3) μ () ν () = δ(μ ν). (1.4) E E ν () E () H 1.1: H α(t) = c (t) () + dνc ν (t) ν (), (1.5) H () () + dν ν () ν () = 1 (1.6)

1 Tokyo Daily Rainfall (mm) Days (mm)

( ) r-taka@maritime.kobe-u.ac.jp 1 Tokyo Daily Rainfall (mm) 0 100 200 300 0 10000 20000 30000 40000 50000 Days (mm) 1876 1 1 2013 12 31 Tokyo, 1876 Daily Rainfall (mm) 0 50 100 150 0 100 200 300 Tokyo,

Autumn II III Zon and Muysken 2005 Zon and Muysken 2005 IV II 障害者への所得移転の経済効果 分析に用いるデータ

212 Vol. 44 No. 2 I はじめに 2008 1 2 Autumn 08 213 II III Zon and Muysken 2005 Zon and Muysken 2005 IV II 障害者への所得移転の経済効果 17 18 1 分析に用いるデータ 1 2005 10 12 200 2 2006 9 12 1 1 2 129 35 113 3 1 2 6 1 2 3 4 4 1

n (1.6) i j=1 1 n a ij x j = b i (1.7) (1.7) (1.4) (1.5) (1.4) (1.7) u, v, w ε x, ε y, ε x, γ yz, γ zx, γ xy (1.8) ε x = u x ε y = v y ε z = w z γ yz

1 2 (a 1, a 2, a n ) (b 1, b 2, b n ) A (1.1) A = a 1 b 1 + a 2 b 2 + + a n b n (1.1) n A = a i b i (1.2) i=1 n i 1 n i=1 a i b i n i=1 A = a i b i (1.3) (1.3) (1.3) (1.1) (ummation convention) a 11 x

は呼値の存在を考慮していないことが多く Aï-Sahalia ad Jacod(2012) は実データで計測しているが 実証研究は重要であるものの少ない したがって 本稿では Aï-Sahalia ad Jacod(2014) が提案している方法で大阪取引所の日経平均株価を取引対象としている先物のデ

日経 225 先物と日経 225mii の切断実現ボラティリティの推定 東京経済大学経営学部教授 吉田靖 1. はじめに高頻度データにより実現ボラティリティを計測して リスク管理やオプション価格モデルに用いるための多くの研究がなされているが 実現ボラティリティの計測には マーケット マイクロストラクチャー ノイズの存在が問題となる 具体的な発生要因としては 売り気配と買い気配の間で約定価格が変動するために起きるビット

( ) s n (n = 0, 1,...) n n = δ nn n n = I n=0 ψ = n C n n (1) C n = n ψ α = e 1 2 α 2 n=0 α, β α n n! n (2) β α = e 1 2 α 2 1

(3.5 3.8) 03032s 2006.7.0 n (n = 0,,...) n n = δ nn n n = I n=0 ψ = n C n n () C n = n ψ α = e 2 α 2 n=0 α, β α n n (2) β α = e 2 α 2 2 β 2 n=0 =0 = e 2 α 2 β n α 2 β 2 n=0 = e 2 α 2 2 β 2 +β α β n α!

July 28, H H 0 H int = H H 0 H int = H int (x)d 3 x Schrödinger Picture Ψ(t) S =e iht Ψ H O S Heisenberg Picture Ψ H O H (t) =e iht O S e i

July 8, 4. H H H int H H H int H int (x)d 3 x Schrödinger Picture Ψ(t) S e iht Ψ H O S Heisenberg Picture Ψ H O H (t) e iht O S e iht Interaction Picture Ψ(t) D e iht Ψ(t) S O D (t) e iht O S e ih t (Dirac

K E N Z U 2012 7 16 HP M. 1 1 4 1.1 3.......................... 4 1.2................................... 4 1.2.1..................................... 4 1.2.2.................................... 5................................

φ 4 Minimal subtraction scheme 2-loop ε 2008 (University of Tokyo) (Atsuo Kuniba) version 21/Apr/ Formulas Γ( n + ɛ) = ( 1)n (1 n! ɛ + ψ(n + 1)

φ 4 Minimal subtraction scheme 2-loop ε 28 University of Tokyo Atsuo Kuniba version 2/Apr/28 Formulas Γ n + ɛ = n n! ɛ + ψn + + Oɛ n =,, 2, ψn + = + 2 + + γ, 2 n ψ = γ =.5772... Euler const, log + ax x

タイトル

Flud Flow Smulton wth Cellulr Automt 00N2100008J 2002 225 1. cellulr utomton n t+ 1 t t = f( r, L, + r (1 t t+ 1 f t r t +1 Prllel Vrtul Mchne Messge-Pssng Interfce 1 2. 2. 1 t t 0 t = 1 = 1 = t = 2 2

.2 ρ dv dt = ρk grad p + 3 η grad (divv) + η 2 v.3 divh = 0, rote + c H t = 0 dive = ρ, H = 0, E = ρ, roth c E t = c ρv E + H c t = 0 H c E t = c ρv T

NHK 204 2 0 203 2 24 ( ) 7 00 7 50 203 2 25 ( ) 7 00 7 50 203 2 26 ( ) 7 00 7 50 203 2 27 ( ) 7 00 7 50 I. ( ν R n 2 ) m 2 n m, R = e 2 8πε 0 hca B =.09737 0 7 m ( ν = ) λ a B = 4πε 0ħ 2 m e e 2 = 5.2977

Note.tex 2008/09/19( )

1 20 9 19 2 1 5 1.1........................ 5 1.2............................. 8 2 9 2.1............................. 9 2.2.............................. 10 3 13 3.1.............................. 13 3.2..................................

( ) ,

II 2007 4 0. 0 1 0 2 ( ) 0 3 1 2 3 4, - 5 6 7 1 1 1 1 1) 2) 3) 4) ( ) () H 2.79 10 10 He 2.72 10 9 C 1.01 10 7 N 3.13 10 6 O 2.38 10 7 Ne 3.44 10 6 Mg 1.076 10 6 Si 1 10 6 S 5.15 10 5 Ar 1.01 10 5 Fe 9.00

03.Œk’ì

HRS KG NG-HRS NG-KG AIC Fama 1965 Mandelbrot Blattberg Gonedes t t Kariya, et. al. Nagahara ARCH EngleGARCH Bollerslev EGARCH Nelson GARCH Heynen, et. al. r n r n =σ n w n logσ n =α +βlogσ n 1 + v n w

n ξ n,i, i = 1,, n S n ξ n,i n 0 R 1,.. σ 1 σ i .10.14.15 0 1 0 1 1 3.14 3.18 3.19 3.14 3.14,. ii 1 1 1.1..................................... 1 1............................... 3 1.3.........................

1 (1) () (3) I 0 3 I I d θ = L () dt θ L L θ I d θ = L = κθ (3) dt κ T I T = π κ (4) T I κ κ κ L l a θ L r δr δl L θ ϕ ϕ = rθ (5) l

1 1 ϕ ϕ ϕ S F F = ϕ (1) S 1: F 1 1 (1) () (3) I 0 3 I I d θ = L () dt θ L L θ I d θ = L = κθ (3) dt κ T I T = π κ (4) T I κ κ κ L l a θ L r δr δl L θ ϕ ϕ = rθ (5) l : l r δr θ πrδr δf (1) (5) δf = ϕ πrδr

.3. (x, x = (, u = = 4 (, x x = 4 x, x 0 x = 0 x = 4 x.4. ( z + z = 8 z, z 0 (z, z = (0, 8, (,, (8, 0 3 (0, 8, (,, (8, 0 z = z 4 z (g f(x = g(

06 5.. ( y = x x y 5 y 5 = (x y = x + ( y = x + y = x y.. ( Y = C + I = 50 + 0.5Y + 50 r r = 00 0.5Y ( L = M Y r = 00 r = 0.5Y 50 (3 00 0.5Y = 0.5Y 50 Y = 50, r = 5 .3. (x, x = (, u = = 4 (, x x = 4 x,

ohpmain.dvi

fujisawa@ism.ac.jp 1 Contents 1. 2. 3. 4. γ- 2 1. 3 10 5.6, 5.7, 5.4, 5.5, 5.8, 5.5, 5.3, 5.6, 5.4, 5.2. 5.5 5.6 +5.7 +5.4 +5.5 +5.8 +5.5 +5.3 +5.6 +5.4 +5.2 =5.5. 10 outlier 5 5.6, 5.7, 5.4, 5.5, 5.8,

SFGÇÃÉXÉyÉNÉgÉãå`.pdf

SFG 1 SFG SFG I SFG (ω) χ SFG (ω). SFG χ χ SFG (ω) = χ NR e iϕ +. ω ω + iγ SFG φ = ±π/, χ φ = ±π 3 χ SFG χ SFG = χ NR + χ (ω ω ) + Γ + χ NR χ (ω ω ) (ω ω ) + Γ cosϕ χ NR χ Γ (ω ω ) + Γ sinϕ. 3 (θ) 180

20 4 20 i 1 1 1.1............................ 1 1.2............................ 4 2 11 2.1................... 11 2.2......................... 11 2.3....................... 19 3 25 3.1.............................

LA-VAR Toda- Yamamoto(1995) VAR (Lag Augmented vector autoregressive model LA-VAR ) 2 2 Nordhaus(1975) 3 1 (D2)

LA-VAR 1 1 1973 4 2000 4 Toda- Yamamoto(1995) VAR (Lag Augmented vector autoregressive model LA-VAR ) 2 2 Nordhaus(1975) 3 1 (D2) E-mail b1215@yamaguchi-u.ac.jp 2 Toda, Hiro Y. and Yamamoto,T.(1995) 3

Microsoft Word - 11問題表紙（選択）.docx

A B A.70g/cm 3 B.74g/cm 3 B C 70at% %A C B at% 80at% %B 350 C γ δ y=00 x-y ρ l S ρ C p k C p ρ C p T ρ l t l S S ξ S t = ( k T ) ξ ( ) S = ( k T) ( ) t y ξ S ξ / t S v T T / t = v T / y 00 x v S dy dx

Part () () Γ Part ,

Contents a 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 7 7. 8.. 8.. 8.3. 8 Part. 9. 9.. 9.. 3. 3.. 3.. 3 4. 5 4.. 5 4.. 9 4.3. 3 Part. 6 5. () 6 5.. () 7 5.. 9 5.3. Γ 3 6. 3 6.. 3 6.. 3 6.3. 33 Part 3. 34 7. 34 7.. 34 7.. 34 8. 35

H 0 H = H 0 + V (t), V (t) = gµ B S α qb e e iωt i t Ψ(t) = [H 0 + V (t)]ψ(t) Φ(t) Ψ(t) = e ih0t Φ(t) H 0 e ih0t Φ(t) + ie ih0t t Φ(t) = [

3 3. 3.. H H = H + V (t), V (t) = gµ B α B e e iωt i t Ψ(t) = [H + V (t)]ψ(t) Φ(t) Ψ(t) = e iht Φ(t) H e iht Φ(t) + ie iht t Φ(t) = [H + V (t)]e iht Φ(t) Φ(t) i t Φ(t) = V H(t)Φ(t), V H (t) = e iht V (t)e

2 1,2, , 2 ( ) (1) (2) (3) (4) Cameron and Trivedi(1998) , (1987) (1982) Agresti(2003)

3 1 1 1 2 1 2 1,2,3 1 0 50 3000, 2 ( ) 1 3 1 0 4 3 (1) (2) (3) (4) 1 1 1 2 3 Cameron and Trivedi(1998) 4 1974, (1987) (1982) Agresti(2003) 3 (1)-(4) AAA, AA+,A (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (1)-(5) 1 2 5 3 5 (DI)

_0212_68<5A66><4EBA><79D1>_<6821><4E86><FF08><30C8><30F3><30DC><306A><3057><FF09>.pdf

19 /

19 / 1 1.1............................... 1. Andreev............................... 3 1.3..................................... 3 1.4..................................... 4 / 5.1......................................

note1.dvi

(1) 1996 11 7 1 (1) 1. 1 dx dy d x τ xx x x, stress x + dx x τ xx x+dx dyd x x τ xx x dyd y τ xx x τ xx x+dx d dx y x dy 1. dx dy d x τ xy x τ x ρdxdyd x dx dy d ρdxdyd u x t = τ xx x+dx dyd τ xx x dyd

: 2005 ( ρ t +dv j =0 r m m r = e E( r +e r B( r T 208 T = d E j 207 ρ t = = = e t δ( r r (t e r r δ( r r (t e r ( r δ( r r (t dv j =

72 Maxwell. Maxwell e r ( =,,N Maxwell rot E + B t = 0 rot H D t = j dv D = ρ dv B = 0 D = ɛ 0 E H = μ 0 B ρ( r = j( r = N e δ( r r = N e r δ( r r = : 2005 ( 2006.8.22 73 207 ρ t +dv j =0 r m m r = e E(

I ( ) 1 de Broglie 1 (de Broglie) p λ k h Planck ( Js) p = h λ = k (1) h 2π : Dirac k B Boltzmann ( J/K) T U = 3 2 k BT

I (008 4 0 de Broglie (de Broglie p λ k h Planck ( 6.63 0 34 Js p = h λ = k ( h π : Dirac k B Boltzmann (.38 0 3 J/K T U = 3 k BT ( = λ m k B T h m = 0.067m 0 m 0 = 9. 0 3 kg GaAs( a T = 300 K 3 fg 07345

0406_total.pdf

59 7 7.1 σ-ω σ-ω σ ω σ = σ(r), ω µ = δ µ,0 ω(r) (6-4) (iγ µ µ m U(r) γ 0 V (r))ψ(x) = 0 (7-1) U(r) = g σ σ(r), V (r) = g ω ω(r) σ(r) ω(r) (6-3) ( 2 + m 2 σ)σ(r) = g σ ψψ (7-2) ( 2 + m 2 ω)ω(r) = g ω ψγ

m dv = mg + kv2 dt m dv dt = mg k v v m dv dt = mg + kv2 α = mg k v = α 1 e rt 1 + e rt m dv dt = mg + kv2 dv mg + kv 2 = dt m dv α 2 + v 2 = k m dt d

m v = mg + kv m v = mg k v v m v = mg + kv α = mg k v = α e rt + e rt m v = mg + kv v mg + kv = m v α + v = k m v (v α (v + α = k m ˆ ( v α ˆ αk v = m v + α ln v α v + α = αk m t + C v α v + α = e αk m

30

3 ............................................2 2...........................................2....................................2.2...................................2.3..............................

7 π L int = gψ(x)ψ(x)φ(x) + (7.4) [ ] p ψ N = n (7.5) π (π +,π 0,π ) ψ (σ, σ, σ )ψ ( A) σ τ ( L int = gψψφ g N τ ) N π * ) (7.6) π π = (π, π, π ) π ±

7 7. ( ) SU() SU() 9 ( MeV) p 98.8 π + π 0 n 99.57 9.57 97.4 497.70 δm m 0.4%.% 0.% 0.8% π 9.57 4.96 Σ + Σ 0 Σ 89.6 9.46 K + K 0 49.67 (7.) p p = αp + βn, n n = γp + δn (7.a) [ ] p ψ ψ = Uψ, U = n [ α

gr09.dvi

.1, θ, ϕ d = A, t dt + B, t dtd + C, t d + D, t dθ +in θdϕ.1.1 t { = f1,t t = f,t { D, t = B, t =.1. t A, tdt e φ,t dt, C, td e λ,t d.1.3,t, t d = e φ,t dt + e λ,t d + dθ +in θdϕ.1.4 { = f1,t t = f,t {