|
|
|
- るるみ かやぬま
- 4 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1
2
3
4 1 G7 1. / / ( masanori-ishizuka@dic.go.jp) 1
5 1. 2 G 5 / = X X BOX IMF EU Premium Contribution 3 5 G. Garcia Deposit Insurance: A Survey of Actual and Best Practices, IMF Working Paper, April 1999, 4 p24 Risk-based Premium Differential Premium 2
6 ID EL PD LGD 5 LGD forbearance forbearance ID LGD PDLGD LGD / G7 / / 3
7 4 / 1 15 EU 1994
8 5 1 and/or 2 and/or
9 FDIC 1991 EU 1994 EU 10 6
10 CAMELS 12
11 13 Private Banks Cooperative Banks Saving Banks 0.1% 3 CAMELS False Signal / / / / VaR / / False Signal
12 14 CAMELS CAMELS CAMELS bp 27bp bp 9
13 10 1bp bp 14bp 24816bp bp % 8bp 16 17
14 11 5 2
15 12 FDIC MOF II
16 9% 1 Tier1 6% 2 6% 3 65% 1 65% 70% 1.5 / 70% 75% 2 75% 85% % 0% 3 10 Tier 1 30% 1 30% 60% 2 60% 3 1 /Tier 1 100% % 200% 2 20% 200% 3 100% 4 / + 60% 2 40% 1 40% 0 80% 4 100% 2 / 120% 1 3 / / 120% % 4 75% 2 70% 1 70% 0 80% 4 60% 2 50% 1 50% 0 3 = 5 = X 40% 18 X 10% 5 = X 60% X 20% 13
17 2002 IMES Discussion Paper Series A. Demirguc-Kunt Designing a Bank Safety Net: A Long term Perspective, World Bank IBRD, 1999 & E. Kane Deposit Insurance around the Globe: Where Does It Work? IBRD, September 1999 T. Sobaci Deposit Insurance around the World: A Data Base, IBRD, May 2000 Basel Committee for Bank Supervision BCBS, Core Principles for Effective Banking Supervision, September 1997 Deposit Protection Schemes in the Member Countries of the Basle Committee, June 1998 The New Basel Capital Accord Basel II, April 2003 European Union Directive 94/19/EC on Deposit-Guarantee Schemes, May 1994 Financial Stability Forum FSF Guidance for Developing Effective Deposit Insurance Systems, September 2001 G. Garcia Deposit Insurance: A Survey of Actual and Best Practices, IMF Working Paper, April 1999 Deposit Insurance and Crisis Management, IMF, March 2000 International Association of Deposit Insurers IADI Research & Guidance Committee: General Guidance for Differential Premium Systems Draft September 2003 J. Barth, G. Caprio & R. Levine Banking Regulation and Supervision: What Works Best? BIS, January 2002 L. Laeven Pricing of Deposit Insurance, IBRD, July 2002 N. Ketcha Deposit Insurance System Design and Consideration, BIS Policy Paper No.7, November 1999 R. Sahajwala & P. Van den Berge Supervisory Risk Assessment and Early Warning Systems, BCBS Working Paper, December 2000 R.Vaez-Zadeh, D.Xie & E. Zoli A Market-Oriented Deposit Insurance Scheme, IMF Working Paper, December 2002 A. Blinder & R. Wscott Reform of Deposit Insurance: A report to the FDIC, FDIC, March 2001 A. Greenspan Testimony on Deposit Insurance, BIS Central Bank Articles and Speeches, February 2003 Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation FDIC FDIC Law, Regulations, Related Acts Keeping the Promise: Recommendations for Deposit Insurance Reform, April 2001 Options Paper, August 2000 Response to IADI Survey, January 2003 Response of FDIC to IADI R&G Subcommittee, May 2003 G. Hanc Deposit Insurance Reform: State of the Debate, FDIC Banking Review, 1999 J. Marino & R. Bennett The Consequences of National Depositor Preference, FDIC Banking Review,
18 L. Shibit Should Bank Liability Structure Influence Deposit Insurance Pricing? FDIC Working Paper, January 2002 R. Bennett Evaluating the Adequacy of the Deposit Insurance Fund, FDIC Working Paper, December 2001 R. Oshinsky Effects of Bank Consolidation on the Bank Insurance Fund, FDIC Working Paper, 1999 T. Curry, P. Elmer & G. Fissel Using Market Information to Help Identify Distresses Institutions, FDIC Banking Review, 2003 Canada Deposit Insurance Corporation CDIC Canada Deposit Insurance Corporation Act Canada Deposit Insurance Corporation Differential Premiums By-law, May 2002 Response to IADI Survey, January 2003 Response of CDIC to IADI R&G Subcommittee, May 2003 Association of German Banks BDB The Deposit Protection Fund of the German Private Commercial Banks, October 2002 By-Laws, October 2003 Deutsche Bundesbank Deposit protection and investor compensation in Germany, Monthly Report, July 2000 T. Beck Deposit Insurance as Private Club: Is Germany a Model? IBRD, February 2001 Fonds de Garantie des Dépôts FGD Regulations 99-05,99-06, Internal Regulations Monetary and Financial Code Fondo Interbancario di Tutela dei Depositi FITD Annual Report 2002 Statutes and By-laws, April 2001 Response to IADI Survey, January 2003 Deposit Guarantee Board DGB The Act1995 Response to IADI Survey, January 2003 Financial Services and the Treasury Bureau Deposit Protection Scheme Bill, April 2003 Hong Kong Monetary Authority Introducing Deposit Insurance in Hong Kong, Consultation Paper, March 2002 Central Deposit Insurance Corporation CDIC Annual Report 1999, 2000, 2001 Deposit Insurance Act Response of CDIC to IADI R&G Subcommittee, May 2003 Response to IADI Survey, May
19 Monetary Authority of Singapore Deposit Insurance Scheme, Consultation Paper, August 2002 Saving Deposit Insurance Fund SDIF Response of SDIF to IADI R&G Subcommittee, May 2003 Response to IADI Survey, June 2003 Seguro de Depositos S.A. SEDESA Response of SEDESA to IADI R&G Subcommittee Annual Report,
20 1 9 1 ( hisanori-kataoka@dic.go.jp) 17
21 FDICCDIC FDIC FDIC 5, , /6 FDIC S&L OCC FRB FSLIC FDICOTS 1989 S&L FDIC FSLIC FDIC S&L 2 2 FSLIC FDIC BIF S&L SAIF FSLIC FSLIC 3 FDIC FRF FDIC 18
22 FDIC FRS FDIC 1980 S&L FRS 1991 S&L FDICIA FDIC FDIC S&L FDIC , JP Morgan CITICORP 11% Lynn Shibut Should Bank Liability Structure Influence Deposit Insurance Pricing? FDIC Working Paper January 2002 James A. Mariano and Rosalind L. Bennett, The Consequences of National Depositor Preference, FDIC Banking Review Vol.12, No p FDICIA 5 NCUA FDIC The Financial Institution Employee s 0.23% Guide to Deposit Insurance, FDIC estimated insured deposits FDIC FDIC 19
23 , S&L FSLIC RTC> , S&L FIRREA FSLIC FDIC S&L SAIF S&L 1996 RTC FDICIA 1990 S&L FDIC 41 S&L FDIC FDIC FDIC S&L FSLIC S&L ,600 1, % % FDIC Statistics At A Glance, Jun FDIC Annual Report p18 FDIC FDIC Managing the Crisis The FDIC and 1991 FDICIA RTC Experience , Aug. 1998p98 20
24 90 FDIC 1993 FDICIA / FDIC FDICIA FDIC BIF %
25 22 FDIC
26 16 A B C 33 CAMELS A CAMELS A 0% 2A 1B 0.03% 3A 2B 0.10% 1C 0.17% 18 3B 2C 0.24% 3C 0.27% 6 1 Tier 1 Tier1/ 10 5 CAMELS 16 FDIC Options Paper, Aug. 2000, p11 17 CAMELS A C CAMELS FDIC 20 FDIC Financial Institution Letters Determination of Assessment Risk Classifications, Nov
27 BIF %0.27% BIF 91.7%SAIF 90.6%1A FDIC FDIC 1991 FDICIA 22 1A 23FDIC BIF 24 SAIF A 0.23%3C 0.31% FDIC BIF 1995 Call FDIC Report CAMELS FDIC FDIC Act Section 7c3 FDIC 1996 BIF 23 FDIC Financial Institution Letters 1A 0%3C 0.27% Determination of Assessment Risk Classifications, Nov SAIF FDIC Keeping the Promise: Recommendations Deposit Insurance Fund Act for Deposit Insurance Reform, Apr.2001,p4 FDIC % FDIC Act Section 7b 2 iii v FDIC A FDIC CAMELS 24
28 FDIC 28BIFSAIF CAMELS 29 Call Report FDICIA 1993 FDIC 1A 3C 8bp 1A 26 / BIFSAIF 27bp FDIC 90 FDIC 2,000 FDIC FDICIA CAMELS SCOR CAMELS 28 FDIC Options Paper, Aug. 2000, p20 FDIC 26 CAMELS Lynn Shibut "Should Bank Liability Structure 4 5 Influence Deposit Insurance Pricing?" FDIC Working Paper, January George Hanc, Deposit Insurance Reform: State of the Debate, % 1 FDIC Banking Review, December % 27 FDIC Act Section7c 4 29 FDIC Act Section 7b1D 25
29 1996 A 0% 2001 FDIC FDIC BIF SAIF A CAMELS A 0.01% 3C 0.40% % FDIC FDIC Keeping the Promise: Recommendations for deposit Insurance Reform, Apr. 2001, p10 31 FDIC CAMELS 26
30 CAMELS 4 6 FDIC FDIC FDIC 100 FDIC CAMELS 5 Tier1 2% CAMELS 5 Tier1 2% CAMELS 4 Tier S&L 2% FDIC CAMELS 4 Tier1 forbearance FDIC 2% FDIC 1987 FDICIA 32 FDIC CAMELS BIS 10% Tier1 6% Tier1 5% FDIC FDIC Strengthening Financial Risk Management at the FDIC, July 2003, p11 32 FDIC Act Section 38 and 39 27
31 33 FDIC 34 FDIC FDICIA FDIC FDIC, A Brief History of Deposit Insurance in the United States, FDIC, 1998, p56 34 James A. Mariano and Rosalind L. Bennett, The Consequences of National Depositor Preference, FDIC Banking Review 1999 Vol.12, No.2 35 FDIC Act Section Federal Financing Bank 1973 US Postal Service FDIC FRB FRB LLR FDIC 28
32 41 FDICIA FDIC FDIC FDIC FRB 2/3 42 FDIC FDIC BIF SAIF> FDIC 39 GAO FDIC forbearance GAO BIF 1.25% 66 8 FRB LLR Frederic S. Mishkin, The Economics of Money, Banking and Financial Markets, 7 th Edition, Addison-Wesley, 2004, p FDIC Act Section 13c4 41 Lynn Shibut "Should Bank Liability Structure 39 FDIC Act Section 13c4Gii Influence Deposit Insurance Pricing?" FDIC FDIC Working Paper, January 2002, p45 42 FDIC Act Section 7b1B 43 FDIC FDIC Lynn Shibut "Should Bank Liability Structure Influence Deposit Insurance Pricing?" FDIC George Hanc, Deposit Insurance Reform: State of Working Paper, January 2002, p45 the Debate, FDIC Banking Review, December 40 FDIC Act Section 13c4G 1999, p17 29
33 FDIC FDIC FRB S&L CAMELS % 54% 44 1A 90 FDIC 10 JP Morgan Chase Bank One
34 Financial Practices, 1992 CDIC 45 CDIC 1967 CDIC CDIC CDIC CDIC CDIC CDIC OSFI <FCAC>CDIC CDIC FISC 49 SAC CDIC 1992 OSFI CDIC Strategic OSFI> Alliance Agreement 47 CDIC Act, Section 7 48 preparatory CDIC Virtual Organization VO exam Standards of Sound Business and 49 OSFI CDIC CDIC p OSFI CDIC 31
35 OSFI 34 OSFI CDIC CDIC 1996 CDIC CDIC 1980 CDIC /10 CDIC Opt-out 1987 OSFI CDIC CDIC 1997 CDIC CDIC 4-3 3, CDIC CDIC CDIC 1980 FDIC 32
36 FDIC % CDIC FDIC CDIC 53 CDIC Fund Accumulated Surplus 33
37 CDIC 54 CDIC Act, Section Section
38 % % % % 56 FDIC CDIC 86 FDIC9,267 CAMELS CDIC 14 CDIC CDIC 5, % 57 5, CDIC CDIC Act Section CDIC Act Section 211 CDIC Differential Premiums By-law Section 41 35
39 59 59 CDIC Act CDIC Differential Premiums By-Law 36
40 CDIC OSFI 60 78OSFI CDIC CDIC 2 14 CDIC FDIC CDIC % CDIC CDIC CDIC CDIC CDIC CDIC Differential Premiums By-Law Section 12 CDIC Act Section
41 63 CDIC FDIC FDIC CDIC 4 Moody ss&p Moody s KMV CDIC CDIC CDIC CDIC watch-list members 64 CDIC CDIC CDIC KMV 62 CDIC Annual Report 1999/2000 p18 65 RAP 38
42 CDIC CDIC 67 Premium Surcharge CDIC OSFI CDIC P&A CDIC CDIC CDIC CDIC 68 OSFI 5 Guide to Intervention CAMELS P&A 0 P&A 4 OSFI 5 CAMELS CDIC CDIC CDIC OSFI FCAC CDIC CDIC CDIC 67 CDIC Act Section 45.1 Financial Administration Act Section CDIC Act, Section p
43 CDIC CDIC OSFI CDIC FDICCDIC CDIC FDIC 40
44 1-2 41
45 FDIC Act A Brief History of Deposit Insurance in the United States, 1998 Annual Report 2002 The Financial Institution Employee s Guide to Deposit Insurance, 1999 Financial Institution Letters Determination of Assessment Risk Classifications, Nov Keeping the Promise: Recommendations for Deposit Insurance Reform, Apr.2001 Managing the Crisis The FDIC and RTC Experience , Aug Options Paper, Aug Statistics At A Glance, Jun Strengthening Financial Risk Management at the FDIC, July 2003 Web Site Frederic S. Mishkin, The Economics of Money, Banking and Financial Markets, 7 th Edition, Addison-Wesley, 2004 George Hanc, Deposit Insurance Reform: State of the Debate, FDIC Banking Review, December 1999 James A. Mariano and Rosalind L. Bennett, The Consequences of National Depositor Preference, FDIC Banking Review, 1999, Vol.12, No.2 Lynn Shibut Should Bank Liability Structure Influence Deposit Insurance Pricing? FDIC Working Paper, January CDIC Act Differential Premiums By-Law Annual Report 1999/2000, 2003 Web Site Financial Administration Act 42
46 FDICCDIC FDIC CDIC FDIC Section 7 a [ ] b Assessments Risk-based Assessment System A The Board of Directors insured depository institutions B Private Reinsurance FDIC thecorporation i FDIC 10 ii ( ) C semiannual assessment (i) probability I categories concentrations II III FDIC factors ii the likely amount iii D BIF SAIF A designated reserve ratio i I II 3 ii i 43
47 I II III IV iii v I II iv i 1.25 ii v Section38 moderately severe unsatisfactory not well capitalized i iii B i ii C FDIC D [ ] E FDIC Section 14 (i) Section 7(b) (ii) (iii) SAIF BIF F SAIF SAIF FDICIA Section302(a) (i) (A)(i)(II) (ii) E Section 7(b) 44
48 G FDIC (1) +10BP H Bank Enterprise Act [ ] A F SAIF A (iv) (i) 1 (ii) B FDIC B A (ii) FDIC 15 C FDIC B SAIF D SAIF SAIF FDIC certified statement 5 FDIC emergency special assessments FDIC A i ii FDIC BIF iii FDIC B BIF SAIF [ ] c A FDIC FDIC B (Certification) 45
49 i ii president A b FDIC B A penalty A, i ii B A, C A (B) 1,000,000 1 D Section 8(i)(2) E (F)(G)(I)( ) E 20 Section 8(h) (d) [ ] (e) (Refunds) FDIC A B 46
50 A B C 1996 (i) BIF (ii) (B) C (b)(2)(a)(v)( ) [ ] FDIC Part 327 (Assessments) (Annual assessment rate) a assessment risk classification subgroup assignment i well capitalized Tier1 Tier1 ii adequately capitalized Tier1 Tier1 iii undercapitalized 47
51 primary federal regulator FDIC FDIC ia ii B iii C b c FDIC A d FDIC FDIC e f FDIC g [ ] (Annual assessment rate) (a) (c) (1) (i) (ii) (2) ( ) (i) (ii) (iii) (a)(1)(i) 162/3 48
52 A (b)(2) B (iv) (a)(1)(ii) 1% (A) (b)(2) B v FDIC Act Section 11(a)(8) (b) FDIC (c) FDIC [ ] 49
53 CDIC Section 10.1 (1) CDIC CDIC Consolidated Revenue Fund CDIC (2) CDIC (3) CDIC (a) 60 (b) (a) (4) CDIC CDIC Section [ ] Section 20 CDIC CDIC Section 21 (1) CDIC (a) (by-laws) (b) (2) (a) (b) (c) (3) 50
54 (4) Section (a) 5,000 (b) CDIC /3 <Governor in Council> (5) CDIC CDIC Section 22 (1) CDIC (2) Section 23 (1) 365 (a) CDIC (b) (i) 5,000 (ii) CDIC 1/3 <Governor in Council> (2) 22(2) (a) 60 (b) Section 24 Section CDIC Section24.1 CDIC CDIC Section25 Section21-23 CDIC 161(1) +2 Section 25.1 (1) Section21-25 CDIC (a) OSFI (b) 51
55 (2) (1) CDIC /6% (3)Section21-25 Section Section [ ] Section 31 1 Section 30(1) CDIC CDIC CDIC (a) (b) 30 (2) CDIC (3) CDIC CDIC 60 (a) CDIC (b) (4) 30(1) CDIC 30 (5) CDIC 60 CDIC 5.1 CDIC (6) 31(1) (4) CDIC CDIC Section 31.1 (1) 31(1) CDIC 5 52
56 (a) 31(1) (b) (2) CDIC (3) 2 CDIC (4) CDIC (5) (6) 31(1) Section 32 [ ] Section 33(1) CDIC (a) CDIC (b) (2) CDIC CDIC Section 34 (1) CDIC 2 2 (2) (a) (b) 53
57 (3) (4) CDIC Section [ ] Section 45.2 ( ) CDIC CDIC Section [ ] Section 49 (a) (b) CDIC Section 50 (a) Section (b) Section 50.1 (a) (b) 50 Section 51 54
58 Section 52 (1) ( ) (2) CDIC Section 53 Section 54 [ ] CDIC Section 1-2 Section 3 CDIC Act Section23(1)(a) (a) 5,000 (b) ABC A 1/3% (Governor in Council)CDIC Act Section 23(1)(b)(ii) 1/3% B Section23(1)(b)(ii) ( ) C 1 (12.5%) Section 4 (1) CDIC 21(1)(a) (a) 5,000 (b) (2) ABC A 1/3% (Governor in Council)CDIC Act Section 21(4)(b) 1/3% B Section21(4)(b) ( ) C (2) Section 6 (1)(b) (D E365 )+ F G365 D 4 (1)(b) 55
59 E (5 1 ) 7(1)(b) 15(1) 16 CDIC F (1)(b) G 7(1)(b) 15(1) 16 CDIC 4 30 Section 5 CDIC 7 15 (a) (b) Section 7 8 Section 6 (1) CDIC Section (a) Section12(1)(a) (b) Section12(1)(b) Section7(1)(b) 15(1)(a)-(e) Section16 (2) CDIC Section 7 8 Section 7 (1) CDIC 1 (a) 24 (b) 4 30 CDIC (a) (2) (1) (a) (b) (3) Section 8 7 Section9-11 Section 9 Section 10 11(1) CDIC Section (2)(b) 1 11(4)12(2) CDIC (a) 56
60 (b) Section 11(1) CDIC (2) (3) (2) (1) (a) Section (b) (i) Section (ii) Section (3) (1) (a) Section 28 (2) (b) Section 29 (c) Section 30 (4) Section 10 Section Section Section 12 (1) Section (a) Section 15(4)(a) 16(2)(a) 7 1 (b) 4 30 (7)(1)(b) 15(1)(a) (e) Section 13 [ ] Section 14(1) CDIC 7 15 (2) CDIC [ ] 57
61 CDIC Section 1-18 [ ] ( ) Section 19 CDIC Section 20 CDIC CDIC [ ] 58
62 FAX HP Deposit Insurance Corporation of Japan 2004 Printed in Japan (1) (2) (1)(2) ( )
1 2 1
2005 3 1 24 48 54 66 http://www.dic.go.jp/) 1 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 3 20 21 22 23 1 46 1971 7 1 100 61 1,000 13 16 17 3 10.4 2 15 3.5 5.3 1.8 8.6 1 E-mail: nobusuke-tamaki@dic.go.jp)
1. 2006 2 6 1980 90 2. 3. 10 4. FDIC 5 5. FDIC NY Tel 03-3201-0557 E-Mail takashi.enbutsu@mizuho-ri.co.jp atsushi.niigata@mizuhocbus.com 3 4 4 6 9 14 14 17 27 30 31 34 34 35 37 38 38 39 2006 2 1 00 FDIC
米国における金融・資本市場改革の展開
1980 DIDMCA 1982 1994 20 & 1989 FIRREA 1991 FDICIA 1999 11 12 Gramm-Leach- Bliley Act P.L.106-102, 113 STAT.1338 1933 Glass-Steagall Act P.L. 73-66, 48 STAT. 162 66 1980 1981 1980 1990 & Savings and Loan
Microsoft Word - 査読SP問題110510RR.doc
JAVCERM Journal [] 2 # 2011_01_Ronko 2010 1 4 2011 5 12 1 2 2 1999 National Bank of Keystone(Keystone), Pacific Thrift and Loan(PLT) FDIC CAMEAL 20 20 1 11 6 2.2 2000 Greenspan FRB 2000 IT IT Greenspan[2004]
米独の金融自由化とセイフティ・ネットの展開（ ）
10 * 43 1950 1960 1980 1990 Bank-Oriented System 1. 1.1. 1.1.1. 1933 Q 1970 110 1970 6 1973 7 1978 6 MMC1 1 1980 Depository Institutions Deregulation and Monetary Control Act of 1980 DIDMCADIDMCA 6 NOW
PDFŠpŒ{Ł¶
Shinkin Central Bank Monthly Review 2003.12 hinkin Central Bank Monthly Review 200312 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 Community Banker 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36
野村資本市場研究所｜ベイルインの導入に向けた検討－破綻時に債権の損失吸収を図る新たな措置－（PDF）
1. SIFI 2. EU 1 FDIC G20 FSB 3. 4. FSB 2012 8 G20 88 2012 6 EU EU bail-in 1 ICB 2 write-down SIFI SIFI SIFI bail-out SIFI G20 too big to fail 2010 6 G20 SIFI 1 3 2011 11 FSBG20 1 2 3 2012 ICB PLAC 2011
野村資本市場研究所｜国際基準との調和も踏まえた米国SIFI規制（PDF）
SIFI 1. FRB 2011 12 20 500 FRB SIFI 500 FRB 2. SIFI FRB G-SIB 2016 LCR NSFR 3. SIFI 25 SIFI 10 2 SIFI 4. SIFI 83 2012 Winter FRB FRB 2011 12 20 1 SIFIFRB 2011 4 6 2012 165 (a) interconnected 500 bank holding
untitled
S C B SHINKIN CENTRAL BANK 103-0028 1-3-7 TEL.03-5202-7671 FAX.03-3278-7048 URL http://www.scbri.jp 20 1015 GDP 80 S&L OFHEOHPI 2007 79 0.4 1994 13 1975 2007 912 1995 1-3 100 OFHEO 1980 2000 GDP ( 5.9)
地方債と地方財政規律
* 1990 GDP 40 JEL Classification: H39, H54, H63, H72, H77 Key words: * 16 (2005a, b) 1 Local Government Bonds and Fiscal Discipline By Takero Doi, Tomoko Hayashi and Nobuyuki Suzuki Abstract Outstanding
A5 PDF.pwd
Global Reporting Initiative GRI 2013 International Integrated Reporting Council: IIRC IIRC 2013 European Union: EU European Parliament and the Council of the European Union 2014 Public Interest EntitiesPIE
2 2 3 4 5 5 6 10 14 17 18 18 20
1. 1990 2001 38 02 2. 90 3. 00 3 4. 02 5.5 3.6 2 5. 02 03 GDP 0 2 2 3 4 5 5 6 10 14 17 18 18 20 1930 50 81090 10 2001 38 2.2 2.301 7 02 3.603 5 3.5 FRB03 2 11 BS BS BS 90 1 Personal Income and Its Disposition
topics_040
/ / SWF Sovereign Wealth Fund Ease of Doing Business 1.0 0.4 7.9 9.7 Bank of Canada [2015] Monetary Policy Report, January 2015. Bank of England [2015] Inflation Report, February 2015. BIS [2015]
IMES DISCUSSION PAPER SERIES INSTITUTE FOR MONETARY AND ECONOMIC STUDIES BANK OF JAPAN 100-8660 30 IMES Discussion Paper Series 99-J-45 199912 12 1986 General Agreement of Trade in Service Multilateral
(1) (2) (3) (4) (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (1) (2) (3) (4) S&L (1) (2) (3) S&L (4) (5) (1) (2) (3) (4) (1) (2) 2 New York
S C B SHINKIN CENTRAL BANK 104-0031 3-8-1 TEL.03-3563-7541 FAX.03-3563-7551 http://www.scbri.jp/ FDIC New York 15-5 2004.2 (1) (2) (3) (4) (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (1) (2) (3) (4) S&L (1)
アジアの資本移動の変化に関するクラスター分析 アジア域内の証券投資活性化に向けて
* ** 199 1 1996-97 relation * ** Seoul conference China and Emerging Asia: Reorganizing the Global Economy? held by KIEP and Seoul National University 26 5 11-12 Hugh Patrick Yung-Chul Park 26 9 9-1 East
野村資本市場研究所｜SWF：行動規範の策定と最近の動向（PDF)
SWF 1. SWF SWF SWF 2. SWF SWF 26 IMF OECD 3. SWF IMF GIC SWF 4. SWF SWF SWF 5. SWF SWF CIC 6. SWF SWF SWF OECD IMF 145 2009 Winter Sovereign Wealth Fund SWF 2008 9 SWF 2007 2008 SWF 2008 SWF 2008 6 SWF
DP/02-2 Discussion Paper, Version 1, JEL classification : G21, G
DP/02-2 Director General for Economic Assessment and Policy Analysis CABINET OFFICE DP/02-2 Discussion Paper, Version 1, 2002 9 JEL classification : G21, G28 E-mail: keiichi.omura@mfs.cao.go.jp E-mail:
IMES DISCUSSION PAPER SERIES Discussion Paper No. 99-J-17 INSTITUTE FOR MONETARY AND ECONOMIC STUDIES BANK OF JAPAN 100-8630 203 IMES Discussion Paper Series 99-J-17 1999 6 * JEL classification E52 E58
IMFの融資制度 : アイスランド、ウクライナ、ハンガリー、ラトビアのケースをもとにして
Global Economy," Address to the Chicago Council on Foreign Relations, February 27. IMF -- IMF, 1997, "Thailand: Letter of Intent," November 25. IMF, 1997, "Indonesia: Letter of Intent," October 31. IMF,
美唄市広報メロディー2014年1月号
1 2014 E-mailkouhoujouhou@city.bibai.lg.jp January May September October November December February March June July August April BIBAI CITY INFORMATION http://db.net-bibai.co.jp/bibai/
中国引き締め策の対外的影響
ito@nli-research.co.jp 2 2003 2004 9.8 47.8 10.7 84.3 3 1 1 4 5 9.6 9.8 47.8 28.6 84 60.2 30.2 7.5 SARS 15.4 338.83 11.9 726.97 42.7 SARS 10.7 12.8 ( ) 10.9 16.1 1997 6 8.7 11.9 20.7 21.6 16.2 17 7 15.3
資料３.doc
1 2 I. 1. 1 11 3 4 5 2. 2 http://www.state.gov/e/eb/rls/othr/2007/22281.htm 3 DOT http://ostpxweb.dot.gov/aviation/data/freedoms.htm 6 6 4 7 5 ECOFORUM24 4 2006 17 6 GATS GATS 1994 4 124 1995 1 1 8 7 Annex
野村資本市場研究所｜ASEAN投資信託市場の現状と課題（PDF）
213 Spring ASEAN 1. 2. 5.7 ASEAN 3. 3.3 4. 2.4 5. ASEAN 76 1 ASEAN 213 ASEAN 4 ASEAN ASEAN 2 1 1 1 1 1 OECD The Emerging Middle Class in Developing Countries January 21 2 Cerulli Associates Asset Management
Association of South East Asian Nations: ASEAN ASEAN ASEAN ASEAN ASEAN ASEAN ASEAN
Association of South East Asian Nations: ASEAN ASEAN ASEAN ASEAN ASEAN ASEAN ASEAN ASEAN ASEAN ASEAN ASEAN ASEAN ASEAN ASEAN Free Trade Agreement: FTA FTA ASEAN ASEAN ASEAN ASEAN The European Union: EU
000-015-v6.ai
Annual Report 2010 http://www.tokyo-jc.or.jp Tokyo JC President AREA Design JAPAN Design TOKYO Design 2010 Year Schedule 2010 Year Schedule 2010 Year Schedule January January February February March March
ケインズ『お金の改革論』山形浩生訳 Keynes, A Tract on Monetary Reform, 1923, Japanese translation Hiroo Yamagata 2015
A Tract on Monetary Reform *1 * 2 2014 6 17 *1 *2 c 2014 4.0 (http:// creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) i J M 1923 10 iii 1 1 1914 22 19 1 13 9 1.1 1914 1920 1920 2 1 1.1 1913 (1) (2) (3) 1913 100
金融規制における課徴金制度の抑止効果と法的課題
D&O D&O E-mail: kazutoshi.sugimura@boj.or.jp / /2015.7 143 1. 1 2 3 4 2 5 6 1 2005 13 2 3 6 2 172 2007 31 2 34 21 2 4 2005 40 172 2 1 1 25 3 28 24 301 5 175 1 2 6 2005 13 144 /2015.7 7 8 fairness retribution
和RIMNo.22高安氏.indd
NIEsGDP 1990 200436.1 22.365.1 80 GDP 4 RIM 2006 Vol.6 No.22 RIM 2006 Vol.6 No.22 5 NIEs GDP GDP GDP GDP 90 GDP 1951 80 81 90 90 90 2001 2003 GDP 80 90 2001 2002 GDP 87GDP 80 GDP GDP 6 RIM 2006 Vol.6 No.22
公的機関が関与した企業再生支援
14 56 2004.10 corporate control right debt overhang 4, 1998, p.253., p.263., 2000, p.44. 2004.10 57 DES DDS DES DDS 10 11 Hold out, 2000, pp.215-226, p.44. N 1265, 2004.4.1, pp.25-26. Coase theorem Ronald
SOZO_経営_PDF用.indd
Faculty of Business Administration Department of Business Administration CONTENTS ADMISSION POLICY 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 INTERNET SOZO Wireless Network 16 Campus Life Calendar APRIL MAY JUNE
ＧＤＰギャップと潜在成長率
2003 output gap 80 1 20 90 20 70 2 1 2 output gap potential output 1 2 (2001) 3 potential rate of growth 2000 Meyer (2000) European Central Bank: (1999b) 2002 10 4 3 (2000) 4 4 () 5 5 5 6 () () 7 Total
取引法の観点からみた資金決済に関する諸問題
1 / /2010.1 105 1. 1 1 1 2008 5 2 2008 10 3 1 4 2007 8 1 2008 32 2 2008 5 12 2009 1 2009 2009 3 6 2008 12 2008 3 1842 32 4 2006 10 2009 4 2009 http://www.shojihomu.or.jp/saikenhou/indexja.html 2005 11
ワークショップ「国際財務報告基準（IFRS）と企業行動：IFRSアドプションのインパクト」の模様
IMES DISCUSSION PAPER SERIES IFRS IFRS Discussion Paper No. 2010-J-25 INSTITUTE FOR MONETARY AND ECONOMIC STUDIES BANK OF JAPAN 103-8660 2-1-1 http://www.imes.boj.or.jp IMES Discussion Paper Series 2010-J-25
untitled
Trade and Trade Finance in the 200809 Financial Crisis, IMF Working Paper WP/11/16., Understanding the Great Trade Collapse of 200809 and the Subsequent Trade Recovery, Economic Perspectives, 2Q/2011.
untitled
2 3-2-1 RIA 2 RIA 1 RIA 2 2 1 3-2-2 RIA OMB CAO 3-2-3 OMB OIRA Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs RIA 12866 RIA OIRA's review of a draft regulation OMB 12866 Return Letters OMB Prompt Letters
Non-Deliverable Forwards NDF BIS BIS
Some Features of Foreign Exchange Markets in April OKUDA, Hiroshi On September,, BIS and many Central Banks published surveys of foreign exchange activities that occurred in April. By analyzing these surveys,
MEISEI HEROES HERO HERO HERO MEISEI HEROES
MEISEI HEROES MEISEI HEROES HERO HERO HERO MEISEI HEROES 04 INDEX 06 28 08 24 26 10 14 16 22 18 20 MEISEI HEROES 05 04 MEISEI HEROES 2014 SCHOOL GUIDE MEISEI HEROES 1 2 3 4 5 06 MEISEI HEROES 2014 SCHOOL
公務員倫理問題への新アプローチ
OECD CPI CPI CPI CPI CPI CPI / GDP / / / /.............................. Transparency International Corruption Perception Index CPI CPI 30 25 20 15 10 5 0 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007
November 13 June 1 April 23 October 1 December 22 August 6 September 5 July 2 May 2 8 6 11 1 7 01 1516 4 23 4 1995 4 23 1999 4 23 19 2 02 88 5 2 3 03 6 1 6 1 300 4 04 100 7 2 7 2 706 15 2 5 05 8 6 86
海外における協同組織金融機関の現状
credit union mutual thrift credit union building society Kreditgenossenschaft Savings & Loan association Crédit Agricole Arbejdernes Landsbank Amalgamated Bank credit union mutual thrift savings bank
国際流動性に関する財政的側面について
IMF SDR IMF 2011 6 1 2 2011 E-mail: obstfeld@econ.berkeley.edu / /2011.10 35 1. 2007 2009 2 Goodhart [1999] 2010 11 2. 4 1970 IMF 1960 36 /2011.10 international reserve 1 D 35 1 D 35 1960 Eichengreen [2011]
ペイオフ解禁のための処方箋
2001 4 1 2001 1 1 2 2000 4 3 4 5 2002 3 8 9 6 2001 4 1 2001 4 2001 4 2 2001 1 3 2001 3 1 1 3 4 4 6 6 8 8 9 10 12 12 12 13 13 14 14 14 15 16 17 29 37 1996 11 97 11 2001 4 1 2 2001 4 1 2000 4 2001 3 1 2
1
1 2 3 4 5 6 D A D E - A D F J B D F K C D F K C D F K C D G K C G I K C G I L D H I L D H I L D H I L 7 8 9 No 10 TOPIX TOPIX a a TOPIX a FTSE FTSE FTSE FTSE FTSE TOPIX 11 FTSE FTSE DirectiveEUDirectiveEC
Winter 2009 No Lower Earnings Limit
特集 : イギリスの社会保障 - ニューレイバーの 10 年 イギリスの公的 私的年金制度改革 丸谷浩介 I 1 50 1997 II 1. 2 15 Winter 2009 No. 169 8 3 4 1999 1989 8 2. 4 1 2 1 1992 6 16 Lower Earnings Limit1 65 60 1 2 16 2.40 16 2 1 5 1 2 3. 6 1970 State
野村資本市場研究所｜米国のOTCデリバティブ規制改革－改革の全体像と課題－（PDF）
2012 Winter OTC 1. OTC CDS 2. 2010 7 OTC 3. OTC 4. 5. 6. 7. OTC OTC OTC 2010 7 OTC 132 1 CFTC SEC IT OTC 2010 601 1 2 2000 OTC CDS OTC AIG CFTC SEC OTC OTC 1 2 OTC 800 700 600 500 400 OTC 800 700 600 500
CFC BEPS CFC BEPS
26 27 KPMG 1... 2 1... 2 2... 3 2... 5 1... 5 1 CFC... 5 2... 11 3 BEPS... 25 2... 28 1 CFC... 28 2... 31 3 BEPS... 36 1 1 1 1 1 53 OECD BEPS 2 1 2 2 1. 2. 3. (a) (b) F (c) (a) (b) (c) BEPS 4. KPMG KPMG
Labuan Offshore Financial Service Authority
11 1997 98 2001 Labuan Offshore Financial Service Authority 2000 2001 1983 1958 Central Bank of Malaysia Act 1958 1989 Banking and Financial Institutions Act 1989 BAFIA 1 1983 Islamic Banking Act 1983
........,.,.,..,.,.,.,.,.,.,.,., International Capital Market Litan et al a b c d M&A a a b E- e- Litan et al. : Table Levine World Bank Levine Greenwald et al. B R F R r R R r B R r B R r B R R Stiglitz
商学 ６６‐６☆／７．松浦
1139 2008 9 2008 9 FRB : Federal Reserve Board FRB FRB 1140 1 2008 9 1 1999 2013 Bureau of Economic Analysis, Survey of Current Bunisess, International Data http : //www.bea.gov. 2014 8 10 1141 2000 1
-February FRB BIS IMF BIS Spillover Spillovers BIS IMF EMEs
BIS FRB BIS BIS FRB QE QE -February FRB BIS IMF BIS Spillover Spillovers BIS IMF EMEs GDP GDP........ GDP BIS, 83rd Annual Report, June 2013, p.14 Ibid., p.14. -February 1 1 2009 2013 2) 2009 2013 2) -7.6-4.0
1 May 2011
1 May 2011 2 May 2011 3 May 2011 4 May 2011 5 June 2011 6 June 2011 7 June 2011 8 June 2011 9 July 2011 10 July 2011 11 July 2011 12 July 2011 13 August 2011 14 August 2011 15 August 2011 16 August 2011
, 3, 1999, 4,,
1, 1992 2005,,, 10 2,, 1992 1998 1,,, 1998 2002 2,, 3,,, 2002, 2002 3 1 2 1 , 3, 1999, 4,, 3 14 11 2 I, 10,, 1992 2005, 2,, 3, 4,, II,, 1992 1998 1,, 1998 2002 2 2002 3 II-1: 1 1993 1998 90,, 1995 6850,,
デフレの定義（最新版）.PDF
DP/01-1 Director General for Economic Assessment and Policy Analysis CABINET OFFICE E-mail : naoki.okamoto@mfs.cao.go.jp 1 2 3 i (ii) 4 5 Deflation defined as at least two consecutive years of price decreases.
初等教育普及の観点から見たパラフォーマル教育システムの考察
Batley, R.A., Hussain, M., Khan, A. R., Mumtaz, Z., Palmer, N., & Sansom, K. R. (2004). Pakistan: Nonstate Providers of Basic Services. IDD. University of Birmingham. http://www.idd.bham.ac.uk/service-providers/
研究レポート表紙.PDF
No.118 November 2001 ISO ISO takeishi@fri.fujitsu.co.jp ISO14001 CEAR A4823 1. ISO14000 ISO14000 ISO14001 2. ISO ISO. ISO14001 ISO9000 OHSAS18001 18002 ISO14001 ISO IEC13335 ISO10006. ISO ISO14001 ISO9000
高齢化とマクロ投資比率―国際パネルデータを用いた分析―
196 2017 * ** ** ** ** 160 2 2 JEL Classification Codes E21, E22, J11 Keywords * ESRI 28 ESRI 29 3 17 ESRI ** 115 196 Population Aging and Domestic Investment An Analysis Using International Panel Data
Summer 2010 No. 171 II GM the United Auto WorkersUAW UAW 57, ,
特集 : アメリカの社会保障 アメリカの年金システム 吉田健三 2 1 1 I. Palme 1990 Espin-Andersen 1990 2003 18 33 Summer 2010 No. 171 II. 1941 1959 18 1966 25 GM 1980 2006 65 40 the United Auto WorkersUAW 2006 27.81 1 2005 2076 2 2
商学 ６０周年記念号／２４．内田浩徳
SFAS 109 SFAS 96 1 2 net deductible amounts Richard 1 G. Schroeder, Myrtle W. Clark and Jack M. Cathey Financial Accounting Standards Board, Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No.96, Accounting
会社法制上の資本制度の変容と企業会計上の資本概念について
IMES DISCUSSION PAPER SERIES Discussion Paper No. 2006-J-1 INSTITUTE FOR MONETARY AND ECONOMIC STUDIES BANK OF JAPAN 103-8660 30 http://www.imes.boj.or.jp IMES Discussion Paper Series 2006-J-1 2006 1
1 1 1 [2000]
![1 1 1 [2000]](/thumbs/88/114894310.jpg "1 1 1 [2000]")
* 2000 7 26 1 1 1 [2000] 1 2 1 2 2 1 B to C 250000 億円 200000 日本米国 213,200 150000 100000 50000 0 153,600 106,900 71,100 66,620 42,700 43,860 22,500 26,940 15,340 645 3,360 7,730 1998 年 1999 年 2000 年 2001
MORALITY LEARNING AMBITION 2 KASUMIGAOKA
KASUMIGAOKA MORALITY LEARNING AMBITION 2 KASUMIGAOKA KASUMIGAOKA 3 4 KASUMIGAOKA KASUMIGAOKA 5 Super Science High School 6 KASUMIGAOKA School Life 4 April 5 May 6 June 7 July 8 August 9 September 10 October
2011上宮太子_高校_学校案内
UENOMIYA TAISHI SENIOR HIGH SCHOOL GUIDE BOOK 2011 www.uenomiya-taishi.ed.jp Curriculum Curriculum Letʼs enjoy school life at UT! 01 02 4 April 5 May 6 June 7 July 03 8 9 10 11 August September October
中田真佐男 ３２３‐３５２／３２３‐３５２
IT FinTech Finance Technology e SNS (AI) (2013) (2015) ATM IC EMV VISA MasterJCB VISA Master (Union Pay) VISA Master JCB J-Debit J-Debit VISA IC Alipay QR POS nanaco WAON EdyJR Suica PASMO au Master au
‚å„´561-3“å„´
...... Marks&Spencer British Airways Abbey National 2 3 29 FT a. 4 30 b Pension Benefit Guarantee Corporation c 31 Sea-Land TUPE Ocupational Pensions Regulatory Authority 32 Minimum Funding Requirement
- March SCB -, -, -, -, -, -, -, -, -, -,,,,,, -, -, -, -,, -,,,, -,,,,,, - -,, -,, Survey of Current Business, July, Table (p. ), Oct, Table (p. ) S.
- March SCB -, -, -, -, -, -, -, -, -, -,,,,,, -, -, -, -,, -,,,, -,,,,,, - -,, -,, Survey of Current Business, July, Table (p. ), Oct, Table (p. ) S.C.B. July, Table SCB, -, - - -, -, - -,,,, - Ibid.,
橡motonishi.PDF
2000 3 ITME Discussion Paper No.26 850-8506 4-2-1 moto@net.nagasaki-u.ac.jp 1 1 MRF 1 (2000) 2 MRF 2 Schreft (1997) 3 2 Tobin (1985) Friedman (1992) 3 3 4 5 3 4 5 2 White (1984) 1 4 (1996) (1999) (1999)
本文／ＹＡＺ１７２Ｐ
2004 2005 2006 2007 Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of Treadway Commission COSO 1992 Internal Control-Integrated Framework COSO 1 1 COSO 2009 7 27 2009 9 11 21 1956 1980 1986 MBA 1980 2006 1990 1993
Towards a dynamic European economygreen Paper on the development of the common market for telecommunications services and equipment Europes liberalised Telecommunications Market A Guide to the Rules of
金／金
IMF IMF M&A IMF IMF Gerchenkron Gerchenkron unbalanced growth Gerchenkron Johnson development state Hirschman IMF OECD IMF IMF GDP crony capitalism Krugman IMF capital market-based financial system bank-centered
行動経済学の金融教育への応用の重要性
* 2 2 2010 3 3 2011 4 Princeton University, FINRA Investor Education Foundation2007 5 4 6 ASIC2011a disengagement less-than-optimal choices 7 5 8 2011 9 2011 6 10 OECD2005 11 12 2010 7 13 20112010 14 Benartzi20102011
調査レポート
BRICs 2005 EU 1970 2001 2001 IMF 2002 2001 2003 2007 7 2008 10-12 2009 1-3 14.3 2009 1-3 EU EU EU EU EU 2010 EU EU BRICs 2 0 20 40 60 80 0 5,000 10,000 15,000 20,000 World Development Report 2009 2005
ERM 2007/12/26 1
ERM 2007/12/26 1 1. ERM 2. ERM 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 2007/12/26 2 ERM COSO ERM 2007/12/26 3 ERM 2007/12/26 4 COSO 1985 1980 1985 1987 1992 2004 2007/12/26 5 COSO 2007/12/26 6 ERM CEO CRO) ERM CRO A B C D 2007/12/26
No.7, (2006) A Survey of Legislation Regarding Environmental Information in Europe and Japan IWATA Motokazu Nihon University, Graduate School of
No.7, 35-44 (2006) A Survey of Legislation Regarding Environmental Information in Europe and Japan IWATA Motokazu Nihon University, Graduate School of Social and Cultural Studies As Principle 10 of the
8’¼‹ä127-141
- H.B. Lary Ilse Mintz - - - - - - - Aaa. %. % Baa. %. % Baa - Chase National Bank H. C. Taylor. % Annual Report of Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System.(1933) 231 q Moody s - Aaa Aa A Baa.....
untitled
2009 5 Financial Inclusion Reserve Bank of IndiaRBI Kempson Beck et al. Sarma and Pais 97 RaoRBI Sen ibid. Imperial Bank of India State Bank of India SBI SBI 98 Rao RBI RBI Panagariya ibid. Joshi RBI SBI
米欧における認識中止に関する会計基準と開示規則の動向：リーマン・ブラザーズの「レポ105」を巡る対応を踏まえて
105 105 105 105 IFRS 105 IFRS IFRS IFRS E-mail: tomohiro.shigemoto@boj.or.jp / /2011.8 73 1. 2008 9 15 1 11 11 2 AntonR.Valukas 3 United States Bankruptcy Court Southern District of New York [2010] 4 105
<95DB8C9288E397C389C88A E696E6462>
2011 Vol.60 No.2 p.138 147 Performance of the Japanese long-term care benefit: An International comparison based on OECD health data Mie MORIKAWA[1] Takako TSUTSUI[2] [1]National Institute of Public Health,
IFRS Business Model IASB 2010b, Purpose and status, a and b IASB IFRS IFRS IFRS IASB IFRS IFRS Principles-Based Standard Tweedie 2007 Tweedie 2007, p.
International Accounting Standards Board: IASB IASB 2010b IASB International Financial Reporting Standards: IFRS IFRS IFRS Tweedie 2007, p. 7 consistency AAAFASC 2011, p. 20 IFRS Business Model IASB 2010b,
fringe benefit 6565 1 FEHB Federal Employees Health Benefits States Employee Health Benefits Medicare 1965 TitleX VIII of the Social Security Act1966
特 集 :アメリカの 社 会 保 障 アメリカの 医 療 保 障 システム 雇 用 主 提 供 医 療 保 険 の 空 洞 化 とオバマ 医 療 保 険 改 革 長 谷 川 千 春 1980 20 1 2 2009 2010 2 Employer- Sponsored Health Insurance I 65 16 fringe benefit 6565 1 FEHB Federal Employees
BJ-No.7 01 三好秀和.indd
Vol. 72013 1 1 AIJ 1 AIJ AIJ AIJ AIJ 1 2 3 4 AIJ 2 1986 1986 1 21986 2007 7 2 Vol. 7 3 4 1986 1986 5 5 6 31981 1984 1986 23 3 23 3 247 502 6 22 17 26.4 19.8 5 4 18 7 12 16 10915 200737 41 AIJ 52007 7 62011
2006
2006 1 1 2. 3. 4. 4. 5. 6. 7 2 8. 9. 5 9. 9. 13. 15. 15. 16 3 20. 21. 21. 22. 23. 23. 23. 24 The Adam Room 17 1997 111 199 240 1 3 2006 1 . 3. 4. 4 1. 4 2. 4. 5 1. 5 2. 5 3. 5. 6 1. 6 2. 6 3. 6 1 6 2 6
untitled
CONTENTS 002 004 006 27 008 27 011 PART 1 012 27 013 015 017 019 020 MCEV 023 027 PART 2 028 030 034 036 LiPSS 038 040 042 043 046 049 052 057 PART 3 058 ERM Enterprise Risk Management 060 061 064 067
untitled
CPF 30 65 23 7000 79 5900 3.5 1 Central Provident Fund CPF CPF CPF 55 CPF 1 2 CPF 3 CPF CPF 4 CPF 5 CPF CPF CPF Teo Besey Lai Si, Tsui-Auch 1 1. 3 2. (CPF) 5 CPF 3. CPF 9 CPF 4. CPF 1 1: CPF 2: CPF CPF
IMF http : // htm
1 2 1971 1973 1999 1997 2 IMF 1 1 2 3 1 4 1 2 5 6 1 2 7 IMF http : //www.imf.org/external/np/mfd/er/2006/eng/0706. htm 8 du jure de facto Reinhart Rogoff 20041946 2001 153 Levy-Yeyati Sturzenegger 20051974
e? e? h? h? h? h? h? h? e??ee??ee??ee??ee??ee??ee??ee??ee??ee??ee??ee??ee??ee??ee??ee??ee??ee??ee??ee??ee??ee??ee??ee??ee??ee??ee??ee??ee??ee??ee??ee??ee??ee??ee??ee??ee??ee?? e??ee??ee??ee??ee??ee??ee??ee??ee??ee??ee??ee??ee??ee??ee??ee??ee??ee??ee??ee??ee??ee??ee??ee??ee??ee??ee??ee??ee??ee??ee??ee??ee??ee??ee??ee??ee??ee??
アニュアルレポート 2001
2001 2001 3 2000 2001 2001/2000 2001 6,686,661 7,314,824 +9.4% $58,518 223,204 225,346 +1.0 1,803 264,310 265,868 +0.6 2,127 121,835 121,227-0.5 970 121,835 16,754-86.2 134 1............................
% OFHEO Office of Federal Housing Enterprise Oversight ODPM Office of the Deputy Prime Minister's INSEE (2004 ) PCEOECDE
GDP 7 OFHEO 2005 3 272.89 1980 100 12.0 5 55.3 3 2 1 1979 2004 2 6 2000 68 14.0% 12.0% 10.0% 90 2.75 2005 3.4 8.0% 1 6.0% 4.0% 30.3 2.0% DC 20 0.0% OFHEOHouse Price Index 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000
Supreme Council of the GCC GCC GCC GCC 82 Unified Economic Agreement IMF SDR GCC
アジアの 視 点 通 貨 統 合 を 見 据 える 湾 岸 協 力 会 議 (GCC) 諸 国 の 課 題 調 査 部 環 太 平 洋 戦 略 研 究 センター 上 席 主 任 研 究 員 高 安 健 一 はじめに UAE Gulf Cooperation Council: GCC2007 12 2010 convergence criteria GCC customs union common market
GDP tax expenditure GDP GDP GDP TANF GDP
特集 : アメリカの社会保障 21 世紀のアメリカ社会保障 渋谷博史 中浜隆 櫻井潤 1 2 3 1 2 1960 1980 1963 1980 Reaganomics 1960 1990 2000 1 21 1960 1980 4 21 1950 1 2 1 2 3 2 1 2 3 3 2 2-1 1 2006 1 GDP 8.9 2 tax expenditure GDP 0.7 0.8 4 3
大学論集第42号本文.indb
42 2010 2011 3 279 295 COSO 281 COSO 1990 1 internal control 1 19962007, Internal Control Integrated Framework COSO COSO 282 42 2 2) the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway committee
- March IMF IMF IMF ITO The General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade
M&A IMF IMF gold tranche - March IMF IMF IMF ITO The General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade IMF IMF IMF GATT OECD OECD BITs. - March. U I = I (r m, i, Z * r m i Z * (= Z / Z) I / r m > I / i < I / Z *
野村資本市場研究所｜「財政の崖」回避をめぐる議論と米国地方債市場（PDF）
1. 1 2011 28% 2. 2012 12 3. 2013 1 2 4. 1 1 2013 1 2 2 1 2 Securities Industry and Financial Markets Association, Regulatory Fiscal cliff negotiation could affect the taxexemption, December 10 2012. Bloomberg,
GOVERNOR'S No.1 JULY 2 GOVERNOR'S No.1 JULY 3 GOVERNOR'S No.1 JULY 4 GOVERNOR'S No.1 JULY 5 GOVERNOR'S No.1 JULY 6 GOVERNOR'S No.1 JULY 7 GOVERNOR'S No.1 JULY 8 GOVERNOR'S No.1 JULY 9 GOVERNOR'S No.1 JULY
個人情報保護本文.doc
H13- WG ver..0 ECOM 14 3 WG 1...1 2...3 2.1...3 2.1.1...3 2.1. 2...4 2.1.3...4 2.1.4...5 2.1.5...6 2.1.6...6 3...8 3.1...8 3.2...8 3.2.1...8 3.2.2...9 3.3...10 3.3.1...10 3.3.2...11 3.3.3...12 3.3.4...14
... 1... 1... 2... 5... 6 1... 9...11... 12... 12... 14... 16... 16... 19... 24 2... 27 19891992... 27 19941995... 31 19962001... 36... 43 2... 46 1 TRIPS... 48 TRIPS... 48... 53... 54 1... 54... 57 2...