自殺の経済社会的要因に関する調査研究報告書

Similar documents

60 Vol. 44 No. 1 2 準市場 化の制度的枠組み: 英国 教育改革法 1988 の例 Education Reform Act a School Performance Tables LEA 4 LEA LEA 3

Winter 図 1 図 OECD OECD OECD OECD 2003

Becker 1965 Gronau a a a

@08460025ヨコ/伊東 217号


表紙_目次.PDF

日本の高齢者世帯の貯蓄行動に関する実証分析

自殺防止のために国が実施できる政策について

448 Vol. 44 No 図

_16_.indd


04-p45-67cs5.indd


40B: Satoshi Shimai 1 and Shigehiro Fujimoto 2 1 Center for Liberal Arts and Education, Minami-Kyushu University, Miyakonojo,


産業・企業レベルデータで見た日本の経済成長.pdf

公務員倫理問題への新アプローチ

Title ベンチャー企業の研究開発支出の決定要因 日本と台湾の事例を中心に Author(s) 蘇, 顯揚 Citation 經濟論叢 (1996), 158(1): Issue Date URL Right

税制改正にともなう家計の所得弾性値 : 高齢者パネルデータによる実証分析

2014-sougou_all.pdf

untitled


日本の世帯属性別貯蓄率の動向について:アップデートと考察

5 I The Current Situation and Future Prospects of the North Korean Economy presented at the 2014 Korea Dialogue Conference on Strengthenin

COE-RES Discussion Paper Series Center of Excellence Project The Normative Evaluation and Social Choice of Contemporary Economic Systems Graduate Scho

DP

ボーナス制度と家計貯蓄率-サーベイ・データによる再検証-

Stepwise Chow Test * Chow Test Chow Test Stepwise Chow Test Stepwise Chow Test Stepwise Chow Test Riddell Riddell first step second step sub-step Step

高齢化とマクロ投資比率―国際パネルデータを用いた分析―

Making Democracy Work Making Democracy Work


時間割引:双曲割引と弱加法性


戦間期日本企業の資金調達、資本コスト、資本構成:最適資本構成理論からみた1930年代における企業財務

201609発達・教育臨床論コース

社会関係資本と外国人に対する寛容さに関する研究―JGSS-2008 の分析から―

OSIPP41_p1_2.eps


Graduate School of Policy and Management, Doshisha University 53 動学的資本税協調と公的資本形成 あらまし Zodrow and Mieszkowski 1986 Wilson 1986 Batina はじめに Zodr

,,,

【表紙】経済学論叢_18号/表1・3・背

小塚匡文.indd

Microsoft Word - Šv”|“Å‘I.DOC

,.,,.,. NIRA,.,.,,, GDP.,., 1%, 2.0% 3).,,.,,., 1, 4).,,.,, GDP,.,,.,,,.,,., 2002.,,., 3), Q&A Q16 (

Ishi

H1-H4_政経研究_51-3.ai

, 3, 1999, 4,,


JSPS Grants-in-Aid for Creative Scientific Research Understanding Inflation Dynamics of the Japanese Economy Working Paper Series No.7 日本家計の消費 貯蓄 労働プロ

untitled

62

Winter 2009 No Lower Earnings Limit

2) 3) 2) Ohkusa, 1996 ; 1999 ; Ohtake and Ohkusa, 1994 ; La Croix and A. Kawamura, Reject American Economic Review, Journal of Political Econom

1: 合計特殊出生率 出生率の推移 暦年 アメリカドイツフランス スウェーデン日本 Apps and Re

07-245_25.indd

BB 報告書完成版_修正版) doc

ワールド・ワイド 10‐2(P)/3.中尾

s Government of India, Ministry of Labour d Weiner 16

[ ]友原(責)岩.indd

Financial Reporting Standard 17 FRS17 FAS87 87 Financial Accounting Standard 87 FAS87 International Accounting Standard Board IASB 19 Internat

Autumn II III Zon and Muysken 2005 Zon and Muysken 2005 IV II 障害者への所得移転の経済効果 分析に用いるデータ

Z...QXD (Page 1)

- March IMF IMF IMF ITO The General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade

, , % :

And Business

日本の教育経済学:実証分析の展望と課題.pdf

教育社会学会(180903d)

e.g., Mahoney, Vandell, Simpkins, & Zarrett, Bohnert, Fredricks, & Randall2010 breadth intensitydurationengagement e.g., Mahone

272 11) 12) 1 Barrera 13) 1fl social embeddedness 2fl perceived support 3fl enacted support 3 14) 15) 3 2fl 13) 16;17) 1 14;15;18 21) 2 22;23) 4 24;25



橡同居選択における所得の影響(DP原稿).PDF

46−ª3�=4�“ƒ‚S“·‚Ö‡¦

kenkyujo_kiyo_09.ren

”Лï‡Æ™²“¸_‚æ4“ƒ__‘dflÅPDF‘‚‡«‘o‡µ.pdf

政治参加としての自治・町内会参加者の実証分析

Japanese Journal of Family Sociology, 29(1): (2017)

:- Ofer Feldman,Feldman : -

1 2 : : ADSI OECD : Dowry : Key words : I 1. BRICS 7.5% IMF : Accidental Deaths & Suicides in India ADS

プラズマ・核融合学会

1 NHK Kirkorian, Wartella, and Anderson [3] Schmidt and Vandewater [4] 2

4703ALL01

(’Ó)”R

02古郡氏李氏_a_4.indd

untitled

bottleneckjapanese.dvi


44 4 I (1) ( ) (10 15 ) ( 17 ) ( 3 1 ) (2)

生活設計レジメ

I II III 28 29

22原田氏_a_4.indd

132 Camerer (2003) Chen, Lakshminarayanan and Santos (2006) fmri ventral stiatum Fliessbach K., Weber B., Trautner P., Dohmen T., Sunde U., Elger C. E

<90AD8DF489C88A D322E696E6462>

2009年度 東京薬科大学 薬学部 授業計画

アジアの資本移動の変化に関するクラスター分析 アジア域内の証券投資活性化に向けて

207 Nature,



社会階層と食生活

Transcription:

17

1

2

3

4

5

11 16 30,247 17 18 21,024 +2.0 6

12 13 WHO 100 14 7

15 2 5 8

16 9

10

17 11

12

13

14

15

16

17

II I 18

Durkheim(1897) Hamermesh&Soss(1974)Dixit&Pindyck(1994) Becker&Posner(2004) Rosenthal(1993) ( Gould et al(1994)) Stack(1996) 19

() Durkheim IV 20

Hamermesh&Soss(1974) Rosenthal(1993) IV 21

GDP Neumayer(2003) 22

2 1 Brainerd(2001)Chuang&Huang(1997) Hamermesh&Soss(1974) Yang(1992) GDP 21 23

(2004) West(2003) ( Kawachi et al(1997)) Lester(1987) GNP 24

Durkheim(1897) Durkheim 25

2 2 2 3 22 23 26

Durkheim 2 4 24 27

Hamermesh&Soss(1974) (2004) Chuang&Huang(1997) IV 28

Hamermesh&Soss Durkheim Durkheim Brainerd(2001) Leenaars et al(1993)burr et al(1997) West(2003) 29

Neumeyer(2003) Chuang&Huang(1997) Chuang&Huang Lester et al(1992) 30

Neumayer(2003) Leenaars et al(1993) Leenaars et al(1993) Durkheim 31

Neonate(2003) Leenaars et al Role Conflict Hypothesis () Role Enhancement Hypothesis Burr et al(1997) 32

1970 1980 1980 1960 1970 Neumayer(2003) Chuang&Huang(1997) Lester et al(1997) 33

() Neumayer(2003) Burr et al(1997) 34

Cutler et al(2000) (Social Capital) Social Networks Social Cohesion (2004) Chuang&Huang(1997)( ) 35

(2004) Cutler et al(2000) 36

37

Neumayer(2003) Lewis&Sloggett(1998)(2004)West(2003) Neumayer Burr et al(1997) Chuang&Huang(1997) Hamermesh&Soss(1974) Yang(1992) 38

Lester et al(1992) III IV 39

40

41

42

43

44

45

46

47

48

49

50

51

52

2 33 34 2004 HP 53

54

55

GDP 41 42 194767 5 Hamermesh and Soss (1974) Brainerd (2001) 68 Neumayer(2003) Motohashi (1991) 80 74 74 Platt and Hawton(2000) 43 Neumayer (2003)198098 68 Neumayer (multicollinearity) 56

ecological fallacy Hamermesh and Soss (1974) 57

58

44 59

IV 80 70 60 10 50 40 30 2000 1980 1990 20 10 0 20-24 25-29 30-34 35-39 40-44 45-49 50-54 55-59 60-64 65-45 40 35 1980 10 30 25 20 15 1990 2000 10 5 0 20-24 25-29 30-34 35-39 40-44 45-49 50-54 55-59 60-64 65-60

IV 2000, 03 140 120 100 10 80 60 40 2000 1990 20 1980 0 20-24 25-29 30-34 35-39 40-44 45-49 50-54 55-59 60-64 65-2000. 033 140 120 1990 100 10 80 60 40 1980 2000 20 0 20-24 25-29 30-34 35-39 40-44 45-49 50-54 55-59 60-64 65-61

62 IV

63

64

65

P361 66

67

45 46 68

69

70

NHK 1978 1996 NHK 1978 1996 71

72

73

74

75

76

77

78

47 79

80

81

82

83

84

85

86

87

88

89

90

91

92

V 93

1996 3 94

1990 WHO The Swedish 95

National Programme to Develop Suicide Prevention 1990 2000 15 33 96

10 98 97

V 1998 20 98

50 1986 1 30 99

100

90 KIHASA 101

6 7 65 90 102

103

5-1 1 1 5-1 104

105

Brainerd,E.(2001).Economic reform and mortality in the former Soviet Union:A study of the suicide epidemic in the 1990s. European Economic Review,45,1007 1019 Hamermesh.D.S.,&Soss,N.M.(1974). An economic theory of suicide. Journal of Political Economy,82,8398 Durkheim.E.(1897). Le Suicide: etude de sociologie. 1980. Gould.M.&Petrie.K.&Kleinman.M.(1994).Clustering of attempted Suicide: NewZealand National Data. International Journal of Epidemiology.23(6).1185 1189 Neumayer,E.(2003) Are Socioeconomic Factors Valid Determinants of Suicide? Controlling for National Cultures of Suicide with Fixedeffects Estimation. Cross Cultural Research 37, 307329. Platt.S, and Hawton.K.(2000).Suicidal Behavior and the Labour Market, Chapter 20 in The International Handbook of Suicide and Attempted Suicide, K. Hawton, and K. van Heeringen (eds.), John Wiley and Sons, p.309384. Chuang.H.&Huang.W.(1997). Economic and Social Correlates of Regional Suicide Rates:A Pooled CrossSection and TimeSeries Analysis. Journal of Socio Economics,26,3,277289 Kawachi.I.&Kennedy.BP.&Lochner.K.&ProthrowStith.D.(1997). Social capital, income inequality, and mortality. American Journal of Public Health.87. 9. 1491 1498 Leenaars.A.&Yang.B.&Lester.D.(1993). The effect of domestic and economic stress on suicide rates in Canada and the United States. Journal of Clinical Psychology. 106

Nov;49(6):91821 Burr J.A.McCall P.L.PowellGriner E.1997. Female labor force participation and suicide. Social Science & Medicine 44,Number 12, 18471859(13) Yang.B.&Lester.D.(1996) Conceptualizing suicide in economic models Applied Economics Letters.3.139143 Lester.D.(1987).Relation of Income Inequality to Suicide and Homicide Rates. The Journal of Social Psychology.127(1).101102 Lester.D.& Motohashi.Y.&Yang.D.(1992). The impact of the economy on suicide and homicide rates in Japan and the United States.International Journal of Social Psychiatry.38.4.314317 Lewis.G.&Slogett.A.(1998). Suiciede,Deprivation,and Unemployment:Record Linkage Study. British Medical Journal.317.12831286 Cutler.D.&Glaeser.E.&Norberg.K.(2000).Explaining the Rise in Youth Suicide. NBER Working Paper 7713 Rosenthal.R.(1993).Suicide attempts and signaling games. Mathematical Social Sciences. 26(1).2533 West.M.(2003). Dying to get out of debt:consumer insolvency law and suicide in Japan. The John M. Olin Center for Law& Economics Working Paper Series 21. University of Michigan Law School Stack.S.(1996). The Effect of the Media on Suicide: Evidence From Japan,1955 1985. Suicide and LifeThreatening Behavior. 26(2).132142 Yang.B.(1992).The Economy and Suicide: A TimeSeries Study of the U.S.A. American Journal of Econmics and Sociology.51.8799.(2004)...40.1.7587 107

E. Brainerd(2001), Economic reform and mortality in the former Soviet Union: A study of the suicide epidemic in the 1990s, European Economic Review 46 p.100719. D. Hamermesh and N. Soss(1974), An economic Theory of Suicide, Journal of Political Economy 82, p.8398. Y. Motohashi(1991), Effects of Socio Economic Factors on Secular Trends in Suicide in Japan, 195386, Journal of Biosocial Science 23, p.221227. E. Neumayer(2003), Are Socioeconomic Factors Valid Determinants of Suicide? Controlling for National Cultures of Suicide with Fixedeffects Estimation, Cross Cultural Research 37, p.307329. S. Platt, and K. Hawton(2000), Suicidal Behavior and the Labour Market, Chapter 20 in The International Handbook of Suicide and Attempted Suicide, K. Hawton, and K. van Heeringen (eds.), John Wiley and Sons, p.309384. (2003) 14,,,. (1980),,,. (2005),,. (1991), No.971, p.28692.,, (2001),,.,, (2005), IV,. 108