株式保有構成と企業価値 ─コーポレート・ガバナンスに関する一考察─

Similar documents
季刊 企業と法創造 第1巻第4号(通巻第4号)

濱田弘潤 : 多角化企業の利潤分析 77 多角化企業の利潤分析 多角化ディスカウントの寡占理論による説明 * 濱田弘潤 (diversification discount) Keywords: JEL classifications: D43, L13, L22, G

非上場企業におけるコーポレート・ガバナンス

坪沼

取引銀行の破綻が企業経営に及ぼす影響について-阪和銀行破綻の事例分析-

D F I CP (equity finance) CP (debt finance) ( )


わが国企業による資金調達方法の選択問題

4 2 p = p(t, g) (1) r = r(t, g) (2) p r t g p r dp dt = p dg t + p g (3) dt dr dt = r dg t + r g dt 3 p t p g dt p t r t = Benefit view dp

M&A の経済分析:M&A はなぜ増加したのか

戦間期日本企業の資金調達、資本コスト、資本構成:最適資本構成理論からみた1930年代における企業財務




6) 7) MBO management buy-out 2 necessity sufficiency ) 21


80期期末_表1_web.ai

, 3, 1999, 4,,

<96D889BA904D2E696E6464>

60 Vol. 44 No. 1 2 準市場 化の制度的枠組み: 英国 教育改革法 1988 の例 Education Reform Act a School Performance Tables LEA 4 LEA LEA 3


バーリ&ミーンズの株式会社論

Winter 図 1 図 OECD OECD OECD OECD 2003

_03.indd

アジアの資本移動の変化に関するクラスター分析 アジア域内の証券投資活性化に向けて

Y-...W


(1) (Karlan, 2004) (1) (1973) (1978) (1991) (1991) 1

A5 PDF.pwd


bottleneckjapanese.dvi

1 CAPM: I-,,, I- ( ) 1 I- I- I- ( CAPM) I- CAPM I- 1 I- Jensen Fama-French 3 I- Fama-French 3 I- Fama-MacBeth I- SMB-FL, HML-FL Fama-MacBeth 1 Fama-Fr

76 1 2

[17]Holmström and Tirole (2000) (1) (2) (1) (2) 1 1 2

ID JJF00296 Earnings management and market timing: The case of Japanese management buyouts Yasutomo Tsukioka 2-16 Japan Journal of Finance Vol.

text.dvi

To Our Shareholders C O N T E N T S

2) 3) 2) Ohkusa, 1996 ; 1999 ; Ohtake and Ohkusa, 1994 ; La Croix and A. Kawamura, Reject American Economic Review, Journal of Political Econom

2 / 24

野村資本市場研究所|アジアの金融競争力(PDF)

46−ª3�=4�“ƒ‚S“·‚Ö‡¦

p *2 DSGEDynamic Stochastic General Equilibrium New Keynesian *2 2

2015 : (heterogenous) Heterogeneous homogeneous Heterogenous agent model Bewley 1 (The Overlapping-Generations Models:OLG) OLG OLG Allais (1

untitled

OECD Benartzi and Thaler Brown et al. Mottla and Utkus Rooiji et al. Atkinson et al. MacFarland et al. Elton et al. Tang et al. Benartzi and Thaler Br


ベンチャー・キャピタル投資契約の

Stepwise Chow Test * Chow Test Chow Test Stepwise Chow Test Stepwise Chow Test Stepwise Chow Test Riddell Riddell first step second step sub-step Step

I- Fama-French 3, Idiosyncratic (I- ) I- ( ) 1 I- I- I- 1 I- I- Jensen Fama-French 3 SMB-FL, HML-FL I- Fama-French 3 I- Fama-MacBeth Fama-MacBeth I- S

<90AD8DF489C88A D322E696E6462>

上場変更と株価:株主分散と流動性変化のインパクト

PFI

村本 孜51‐85/51‐85

Jorgenson F, L : L: Inada lim F =, lim F L = k L lim F =, lim F L = 2 L F >, F L > 3 F <, F LL < 4 λ >, λf, L = F λ, λl 5 Y = Const a L a < α < CES? C

cover.ai

メイン寄せリスクと貸出債権価値の評価:ゲーム論的リアルオプションによるアプローチ

COE-RES Discussion Paper Series Center of Excellence Project The Normative Evaluation and Social Choice of Contemporary Economic Systems Graduate Scho

Ishi

インターネットによる情報通信産業の垂直非統合

Q A Q A 1

Microsoft Word - Šv”|“Å‘I.DOC

税制改正にともなう家計の所得弾性値 : 高齢者パネルデータによる実証分析

遺産相続、学歴及び退職金の決定要因に関する実証分析 『家族関係、就労、退職金及び教育・資産の世代間移転に関する世帯アンケート調査』

ミクロ・データによる家計行動分析: 将来不安と予備的貯蓄

headquarter Gertner et al. winner-picking Wal-Mart s

組織の経済学:企業の境界

2 DEA Bain Mann Strickland and Weiss Structure Conduct Performance S-C-P Brozen Demsetz

autocorrelataion cross-autocorrelataion Lo/MacKinlay [1988, 1990] (A)


290 新潟大学経済論集第 92 号 2011-Ⅱ AC 3 A 3 B C

Ver. 1.0 (discretion) (revenue management) (fictitious revenue recognition) (window dressing) (fraudulent accounting practice) SEC (General

IMES DISCUSSION PAPER SERIES Discussion Paper No. 99-J- 9 -J-19 INSTITUTE FOR MONETARY AND ECONOMIC STUDIES BANK OF JAPAN


1990年代以降の日本の経済変動

aragciv54mac.dvi

デフレ不況下の金融政策をめぐる政治過程


23_02.dvi

橡同居選択における所得の影響(DP原稿).PDF

ボーナス制度と家計貯蓄率-サーベイ・データによる再検証-

082_rev2_utf8.pdf

表紙_目次.PDF

untitled

1 Flores, D. (009) All you can drink: should we worry about quality? Journal of Regulatory Economics 35(1), Saggi, K., and Vettas, N. (00) On in

keyneshicks4.dvi

Title ベンチャー企業の研究開発支出の決定要因 日本と台湾の事例を中心に Author(s) 蘇, 顯揚 Citation 經濟論叢 (1996), 158(1): Issue Date URL Right

日本の高齢者世帯の貯蓄行動に関する実証分析

7,447 1,384 1,62 6,886 1,474 1,79 23, 4,3 3,2 62% 66% 67% 14,334 2,859 2,142 1

商学 59‐5・6/1.岡部

進展するコーポレート・ガバナンス改革と日本企業の再生

企業価値重視、効率化経営の時代到来へ

産業・企業レベルデータで見た日本の経済成長.pdf

<346B5F BC8CC389AE91E58A A AD985F8F D A967B95B62E696E6462>

導入

,398 4% 017,

JAPAN SYSTEMS V ision Contents

(2004 ) 2 (A) (B) (C) 3 (1987) (1988) Shimono and Tachibanaki(1985) (2008) , % 2 (1999) (2005) 3 (2005) (2006) (2008)

2

所得税と課税最低限に関する一考察

untitled

Transcription:

q E-mail: kenji.nishizaki@boj.or.jp E-mail: kurasawa@ynu.ac.jp

OECD Vives Tirole Shleifer and Vishny

q

%% %% % % Allen and Gale

%%

%

Admati, Pfreiderer and Zechner Burkart, Gromb and Panunzi Cremer 1995Pagno and Röell 1998Rajan 1992

1 0 1 e r e r e r e r (e)> 0, r (e) < 0. e c e c(e) c (e)> 0, c (e) > 0. e

ec e e r (e) r (e) (0 1) (1 ) r (e) r (e) r (e) ( ) r (e) ( ( ))r(e) ( ) ( )> 0, ( ) < 0, (0) = 0, (0) = 1, (1) = 0. 0 < 1 0 < ( ) < 1 e r (e) ( ) r (e) ( ) r (e) (0 < 1) h (, ) h (0, )= 0, h (, )> 0, h (, )> 0, h (, )< 0, h (, )< 0. h h Burkart, Gromb and Panunzi

(1 ) r (e) (1 ) r (e) 1 e α ( )< 0 α ( )= 0Burkart, Gromb and Panunzi

er (e) { ( )(1 )+ (1 ) ( )}r (e) c (e), e max ( )(1 )+ (1 ) ( ). [0, 1] {(1 ( ))(1 )+ ( ) h(, )}r (e), e r (e) r (e) max (1 ( ))(1 )+( ) h(, ). [0, 1] 1 1 = 0 0 < 1 (1 ) ( )= ( ), {(1 ( ))(1 )+( )} h(, ) h(, )/h(, )

h (0, )= 0 ( )=h (, ), h (0, )= 0 0 < <1 0 < <1 M S S A M O

A h MM h h (, )< 0 M S S M B A D C O

S S A C M SM S D h h D e e e max (, ) r (e) c(e). e (, ) (1 ) +(1 ) ( ), (, ) r (e) =c (e). e

r (e) = c (e) e e (, ) e e c e r e r e O e e e e = (1 ) ( ), <0 >0 <0de d <0dr (e) d <0 e r (e) e e=e = 0 = 0 (, ) (1 )+ (1 ) ( )<1. (1 )+1. = 1

v F v F v F F (, ) r (e). F (, ) (1 )+( ) v F v F v F F r = r + F. r v F r v F F (, ) r r v F F (, ) rv F r v F F (, ) v F r v F F (, ) F (, ) = ( ) (1 ( )). v F ch

h F (, ) v F v S v T v s s (, ) r (e), v T T ( ) r (e). e r v F +?? / 0 / > 0 Fluck Fluck

s (, ) (1 )(1 )+( ) T ( ) (1 )+ ( ) v s v T v T hc v F v T v F v S v S v F v > > T. q v F q v S v S > 0 > v F v S v F v S v F

%

q McConnell and Servaes q Nickell, Nicolitsas and Dryden

Lichtenberg and Pushner q q

q q < 10,10 < q q it = 1 i,t + 2 i,t 1 +. Timedum +. Share i, t 1 + c + i, t. qq TimedumSharec, Timedum,, Share, c q q

Timedum Share KinyuHoujin KaigaiKojin Kinyu HoujinKojin Kinyu Houjin Kaigai Blockholder Kinyu Kaigai KojinHoujin KaigaiKojin c q % Kinyu HoujinKojin

q Blockholder Kinyu Houjin Kaigai Kojin q t 1 Blockholder t 1 Kinyu t 1 Houjin t 1 Kaigai t 1 Kojin t 1 q t 1 Blockholder t 1 Kinyu t 1 Houjin t 1 Kaigai t 1 Kojin t 1 random effect fixed effect % FGLS feasible generalized least squares Baltagi Swamy and Arora

% Lichtenberg and Pushner Lichtenberg and Pushner

p p p p p p 1 2 Blockholder Kinyu Houjin Kaigai Kojin c Adj-R 2 p p p p p p 1 2 Blockholder Kinyu Houjin Kaigai Kojin c Adj-R 2 p p p p p p p 1 2 Blockholder Kinyu Houjin Kaigai Kojin c Adj-R 2

M&A MBO

1 1 = 0 0 <1 (1 ) ( )= ( ). = 0 = 1 ( ) < 1 M h (0, ) = 0 ( )= h (, ), = 0 = 0 0 1 SM S0 < <1 0 < <1 ( ) S A M 1 O 1

(1 ) ( ) d ( ) d = ( ) d, ( ) d h d = h d. ( ) h ( ) h = +, ( ) ( ) (1 ) ( ) h = +, = (1 ) ( ) h + ( ) 2 > 0, ABAC ABAC

q q q + + %% %% %

+ + + q q q q q

q q q q

Admati, A. R., P. Pfreiderer, and J. Zechner, Large Shareholder Activism, Risk Sharing, and Financial Market Equilibrium, Journal of Political Economy, 102, 1994, pp. 1097-1130. Allen, F., and D. Gale, Corporate Governance and Competition, in X. Vives ed. Corporate Governance: Theoretical and Empirical Perspectives, Cambridge University Press, 2000, pp. 23-84. Baltagi, B. H., Econometric Analysis of Panel Data: Second Edition, John Wiley & Sons, 2001. Burkart, M., D. Gromb, and F. Panunzi, Large Shareholders Monitoring, and the Value of the Firm, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 102, 1997, pp. 693-728.,, and, Why Higher Takeover Premia Protect Minority Shareholders, Journal of Political Economy, 106, 1998, pp. 172-204. Cremer, J., Arm's Length Relationship, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 110, 1995, pp. 275-296.

Fluck, Z., Optimal Financial Contracting: Debt versus Outside Equity, Review of Financial Studies, 11, 1998, pp. 383-419. Lichtenberg, F. R., and G. M. Pushner, Ownership Structure and Corporate Performance in Japan, Japan and the World Economy, 6, 1994, pp. 239-261. McConnell, J. J., and H. Servaes, Additional Evidence on Equity Ownership and Corporate Value, Journal Financial Economics, 27, 1990, pp. 595-612. Nickell, S., D. Nicolitsas, and N. Dryden, Additional Evidence on Equity Ownership and Corporate Value, European Economic Review, 41, 1997, pp. 783-796. OECD, OECD Principles of Corporate Governance, 1999. Pagno, M., and A. Röell, The Choice of Stock Ownership Structure: Agency Costs, Monitoring, and the Decision to Go Public, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 113, 1998, pp. 187-226. Rajan, R.G., Insiders and Outsiders: The Choice between Informed and Arm s-length Debt, Journal of Finance, 47, 1992, pp. 1367-1400. Shleifer, A., and R. Vishny, A Survey of Corporate Governance, Journal of Finance, 52, 1997, pp. 737-783. Tirole, J., Corporate Governance, Econometrica, 69, 2001, pp. 1-35. Vives, X., Corporate Governance: Does it Matter? in X. Vives ed. Corporate Governance: Theoretical and Empirical Perspectives, Cambridge University Press, 2000, pp. 1-21.