橡本文(第4稿).PDF

Similar documents
第2章 家族システム評価のための基礎概念

untitled

Making Democracy Work Making Democracy Work

Taro 議員関係09.PDF

MertonMerton

< C815B83638C928D4E89C88A772E696E6462>

DP doc

社会関係資本と外国人に対する寛容さに関する研究―JGSS-2008 の分析から―

50 Planned Happenstance Parsons Brown Brooks, Gelatt Gelatt 1962 Gelatt, positive uncertainty nonrational Gelatt, 1

08_小野(逆丁).indd

心理科学研究 39号=(P)☆新/8.寺島

Ł×

The Japanese Journal of Psychology 1991, Vol. 62, No. 3, A study on the reliability and validity of a scale to measure shyness as a trait Atsu

56 56 The Development of Preschool Children s Views About Conflict Resolution With Peers : Diversity of changes from five-year-olds to six-year-olds Y

(’Ó)”R

‰gficŒõ/’ÓŠ¹


social capital; SC SC Kawachi Subramanian & Kim 2008 Krishna & Uphoff 1999 Putnum 2000 SC SC SC SC : SC Theall, De Jong, S

マーケティング・チャネル研究における協調関係論の再検討


2

untitled

ハイコミットメントモデルの有効性についての考察 


パーソナリティ研究 2005 第13巻 第2号 170–182


地域活性化システム論カリキュラム研究会報告書

20/September/ (2007) (2007) Berger- ( 2000) Cinii 8 Sociological Abstracts relative deprivation ) *1 (2007) *2 2 4 δ Boudon-Kosaka

Article The Concerns and the Effects about Telework From the Results of Questionnaire Method Yasuhiro Furukawa In this study, I researched the current


Japanese Journal of Family Sociology, 29(1): (2017)

Juntendo Medical Journal

評論・社会科学 85号(よこ)(P)/3.佐分

越智59.qxd

教育社会学会(180903d)

”Лï‡Æ™²“¸_‚æ4“ƒ__‘dflÅPDF‘‚‡«‘o‡µ.pdf

delegate (National Convention) PR CM NHK430 Toyo Eiwa University

政治参加としての自治・町内会参加者の実証分析

? ( ) () ( [2] [3] [7] ) ( [4, 5] [1] ) (0) (0) ) 1995 SSM 2.4 MANOVA 2 ( 1) ( 2) ( 3) 1)

*._.W.\..Vol.8-2/1-4/SFG


自殺の経済社会的要因に関する調査研究報告書

”Y‰Æ”ЛïŸ_‘W40−ª4/ ™ƒ“ª

文字数と行数を指定テンプレート

日本人の子育て観-JGSS-2008 データに見る社会の育児能力に対する評価-

パーソナリティ研究 2005 第13巻 第2号 231–241

untitled

The Japanese Journal of Psychology 1974, Vol. 44, No. 6, AN ANALYSIS OF WORD ATTRIBUTES IMAGERY, CONCRETENESS, MEANINGFULNESS AND EASE OF LEAR

183 学生の情緒的側面の充実と教育成果 CSS JCSS はじめに IR IR IR JCSS 学生の教育評価の意味 PISA

農村生活改善大扉2002.5.1.PDF

仏大 社会学部論集40号◆/10.星

JGSS-2000にみる有権者の政治意識

untitled

Stepwise Chow Test * Chow Test Chow Test Stepwise Chow Test Stepwise Chow Test Stepwise Chow Test Riddell Riddell first step second step sub-step Step



02_加藤隆雄.indd

2 251 Barrera, 1986; Barrera, e.g., Gottlieb, 1985 Wethington & Kessler 1986 r Cohen & Wills,

評論・社会科学 116号(P)Y☆/1.郭

untitled

THE JAPANESE JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY 2007, Vol. 15 No. 2, 217–227

公的・非営利組織の人的資源マネジメント戦略:

WHO WHO QOL QOL Aaron Antonovsky - Sense of Coherence: SOC SOC Salus genesis


, , % :

_01野口.indd

a naturalistic b Midgley, N., 2011 Child Psychotherapy and Research - New Approaches, Emerging Findings Catty, J., 2011 Catty, 2011 b Catty 2011 Wren,

<313197E996D82E696E6464>


04-p45-67cs5.indd

卒論本文(最新)

ÿþbÎW'Yf[

3.k.indd

The Japanese Journal of Health Psychology, 29(S): (2017)

(2002a) (1) American Psychiatric Association, (1985) (1989) 1985 (1998) (1999a) (2) 1995 Grotevant, 1998 Leary, T

Jpn. J. Personality 19(2): (2010)

情報化社会に関する全国調査中間報告書

, 1988, 1992, 2001.,

Microsoft Word - 坂本様本文確定

’¬‘é_fiúŒ{‘팯27Y02‘ã’Ž

e.g., Mahoney, Vandell, Simpkins, & Zarrett, Bohnert, Fredricks, & Randall2010 breadth intensitydurationengagement e.g., Mahone


日本看護管理学会誌15-2

橡sei_ho52.PDF

Adult Attachment Projective AAP PARS PARS PARS PARS Table

< F83582E C0B2D929>

88 Merton 1957(orig. 1949): : Twitter Facebook SNS twilog 1 G. H. Mead

橡同居選択における所得の影響(DP原稿).PDF

pp

Newgarten, BL., Havighrst, RJ., & Tobin, S.Life Satisfaction Index-A LSIDiener. E.,Emmons,R.A.,Larsen,R.J.,&Griffin,S. The Satisfaction With Life Scal

2 (S, C, R, p, q, S, C, ML ) S = {s 1, s 2,..., s n } C = {c 1, c 2,..., c m } n = S m = C R = {r 1, r 2,...} r r 2 C \ p = (p r ) r R q = (q r ) r R

w.....I.v48.\1-4.eps

表紙_目次.PDF

2) 3) 2) Ohkusa, 1996 ; 1999 ; Ohtake and Ohkusa, 1994 ; La Croix and A. Kawamura, Reject American Economic Review, Journal of Political Econom

untitled

1996,


情意要因が英語の読解力と会話力に及ぼす影響-JGSS-2008 のデータから-

201609発達・教育臨床論コース

規則帰納における方向性

Transcription:

1 1 Identified Patient 1 2 3 (Burgess, 1926

(Angell, 1936 (Parsons & Bales, 1955 (Straus, 1968; Tallman, 1970; Straus & Tallman, 1971; Tallman & Miller, 1974 (Broderick & Smith, 1979 (Kantor & Lehr, 1975 (Olson, Sprenkle & Russell, 1979, 1999 (Family Cohesion Family Adaptability Communication 2

2 Family Process (Broderick, 1993, p.31, enmeshed, disengaged connected separated structured flexible rigid chaotic 3

Olson et al., 1988 1999 1 2 3 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 4

6. 7. Thomson & Williams, Fisher, 1982 (Cromwell, Klein & Wieting, 1975 1999 (1999 Family Adaptability and Cohesion Evaluation Scales, FACES FACES (Bollen, 1989;, 1992. (Tatsuki, 1993, 1995, 1995 FACESKG Family Adaptability and Cohesion Evaluation Scales at Kwansei Gakuin Version 3 FACESKG 7.55 6p=0.27.99 5

.97-4.45, 1999 (Tatsuki, 1993, 1999 -.38 *** -.30 *** e2.67 *** e1.55 *** -.00 e3.30 ***.16.60 ***.25 ***.50 *** e4.62 *** e5.44 ***.40 *** e6 * *** p<.001 Family Adaptability and Cohesion Evaluation Scales, FACES FACES FACES, 1999 6

FACESKG 1997 FACESKG(Family Adaptability and Cohesion Evaluation Scales at Kwansei Gakuin Version 4 FACESKG FACESKG-32 FACESKG-16 (, 1999 FACESKG-32 FACESKG-8, 2000 (, 1999; Tatsuki & Hayashi, 2000 24.9% 36.5% FACESKG-16 FACESKG-16 ============================== ============================== FACESKG-16 7

,1954/1762,.p. 16, 1954/1762, p.29 53.2%, 2000 FACESKG-8, 1998 (Tatsuki & Hayashi, 2000 (, 1996 (Putnam, 1993 FACESKG-8 (Putnam, 2000 8

(Tatsuki & Hayashi, 2000 1999 1960 (Granovetter, 1973 (, 1998 (Putnam, 1993 9

, 1990;, 1991 3 10

11 ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( (

12

Angell, R. C. (1936. The Family Encounters the Depression. NY: Charles Scibner & Sons. Bollen, K. A.(1989. Structural Equations with Latent Variables. NY: Wiley. Broderick, C.B.(1993. Understanding Family Process: Basics of Family System Theory. Ca:SAGE Publications. Broderick, C., & Smith, J.(1979. The general systems approach to the family. In W.R. Burr, R. Hill, F.I. Nye, & I.L. Reiss (Eds. Contemporary Theories about the Family: General Theories/Theoretical Orientations. Vol. II, NY: Free Press, pp.112-129. Burgess, E.W.(1926. The family as a unity of interacting personalities. The Family, 7, pp.3-9. Cromwell, R. E., Klein, D. M., & Wieting, S. G.(1975. Family power: A multitrait-multimethod analysis. In R. E. Cromwell & D. H. Olson (Eds., Power in Families. NY: John Wiley & Sons. Fisher, B.L. (1982. Transactional theories but individual assessment: A frequent discrepancy in family research. Family Process, 21, pp.313-320. Granovetter, M.S. (1973. The strength of weak ties. American Journal of Sociology, 78, 1360-1380. (1999. 1996. Kantor, D., & Lehr, W.(1975. Inside the Family: Toward a Theory of Family Process. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.( (1988. 1999.Olson 2pp.51-59 1991. 13, pp.147-158. Olson, D.H, Sprenkle, D.H., & Russell, C.S. (1979. Circumplex model of marital and family systems: Cohesion and Adaptability dimensions, family types, and clinical applications. Family Process, 18, pp.3-28; Olson, D.H., Russell, C.S., & Sprenkle, D.H. (Eds. (1988. Circumplex Model: Systemic Assessment and Treatment of Families. NY: The Haworth Press. Parsons, T. & Bales, R.F.(1955. Family, Socialization and Interaction Process. Routledge and K.P. (, 1981. Putnam, R. D.(1993. Making Democracy Work: Civic Traditions in Modern Italy. NJ: Princeton University Press. Putnam, R. D. (2000. Bowling Alone: The Collapse and Revival of American Community. NY: Simon & Schuster., J.J.(1954/1762.. (2000 1990. 7, pp.3-13. Straus, M. A.(1968. Communication, creativity, and problem solving ability of middle- and working-class families in three societies. Reprinted in M. Sussman(Ed., Sourcebook in Marriage and the Family (3rd ed.. Boston: Houghton Mifflin. Straus, M. A. & Tallman, I.(1971. SIMFAM: A technique for observational measurement and experimental study of families. In J. Aldous et al. (Eds. Family problem solving, Ill: the Dryden Press. Tallman, I.(1970. The family as a small problem solving group. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 32, pp.94-104. Tallman, I. & Miller, G.(1974. Class differences in family problem solving: The effects of verbal ability, hierarchical structure, and role expectations. Sociometry, 37, pp.13-37. Tatsuki, S. (1993. The construct validity of the circumplex model of marital and family systems (VII: Confirmatory factor analytic inter- and intra-cultural validation. (1999. Tatsuki, S., & Hayashi, H. (2000. Family system adjustment and adaptive reconstruction of social reality among the 1995 earthquake survivors. International Journal of Japanese Sociology. 9, pp. 81-110. Thomson, E., & Williams, R. (1982. Beyond wives' family sociology: A method for analyzing couple data. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 44, pp.999-1008. (1998 13

1 (1999 2 family cohesion family adaptability, 1997, 3 http://www.tatsuki.com/ http://www-soc.kwansei.ac.jp/tatsuki/ 14