No.7,689-700 (2006) Second Language Acquisition and Learning Strategies MOTOKI Yoshiko Nihon University, Graduate School of Social and Cultural Studies Recently, in an area of studying a foreign language, leaning methods based on students' individuality have been under intensive study. In 1970s, by comparing excellent students with ordinary students, differences in effects of learning methods on foreign language learning were examined, and by 1990s, many researches have focused on the learning strategies. In this paper, using Japanese students, correlations between the examination score of German and the learning strategies were examined. A correlation between the score of a meta-cognition strategy and the grade of German was found. Ellis (1997) Skehan, 1989;, 2005 1970 Cohen & Dörnyei (2002) 20 Cohen Er geht nicht. He goes not. (2005)
Ellis 1970 Oxford (1990) SILL(Strategy Inventory for Language Learning) (Rubin, 1975; Naiman, Fröhlich, Stern, & Todesco, 1978)Rubin(1975) verbal-report Naiman Oxford (1978) 34 O Malley & Chamot (1990) Oxford (1990) O Malley (1990) 690
Oxford(1990) O Malley (1990) O Malley (1990) Oxford SILL Oxford (1990) 2000 150 SILL Oxford (2002) Ellis (1994) (2003) Oxford (1990) (2000) 1990 2003 (1998) 691
(1999) 57 10 10 18 6.3 4.6 SILL (2003) (1999) SILL (2006) 28 28 (Day & 692
Bamford, 1998) (2003) PC PC (1998) PC 2005 11 Oxford (1990) SILL (O Malley, Chamot, & Kupper, 1989) SILL (2003) (2004) Brown (2002) Vandergrift (1997) 16 17 21 Brown (2002) Think-aloud SILL SILL SILL 50 14 693
Oxford (1990) SILL 5 3.5 3.5 (I use new English words in a sentence so I can remember them.) 37 32 18 23 M = 20.51SD = 1.19 2004 (I use the English words I know in different ways.) SILL 100 86.7 (I read English without looking up every new 26.7 word.) 49.4% (86.7%) (26.7%) (I pay attention when some one is speaking English.) (I encourage myself to speak English even when I am afraid of making a mistake.) (I try to learn about the culture of English speakers.) 3.5 50 694
3.5 3.5 (86.7%) 3.3 3.5 3.3 (26.7%) 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 1.2 1.8 100% 3.5 100% 0% 29% (2000 3.5 3.5 90% 0% 33 695
22 7 15 (82.9%) 18 21 M = 19.86SD = 0.83 3.5 2004 SILL 100 82.9 43.8 60,0 39.1 (82.9%) (43.8%) (66.1%) 3.5 3.5 696
3.5 3.5 3.5 17 2006 11 2005 2005 2006 2005 SILL 2005 2005 60 69.4 2005 2005 54.4 2005 2005 2006 697
3.5 3.3 4.9 4.8 2006 10 100% 10 100% 698
100% 74% 26% 86% Rasekh & 38 48% Ranjbary (2003) Rasekh (2003) 10 10 (2000). 8, 57-66. Brown, H. D.(2002). Strategies for Success: A Practical Guide to Learning English. Longman: New York. Cohen, A. & Dörnyei, Z. (2002). Focus on the Language learner: Motivation, styles and strategies. In N. Schmitt (Ed.), An introduction to applied linguistics. (pp. 170-190). Arnold. Day, R. R., & Bamford, J. (1998). Extensive reading in the second language classroom. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Ellis, R. (1994). The study of second language acquisition. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press. Ellis, R. (1997). Second Language Acquisition. Oxford 699
University Press. (2006). (1998) 26, 57-63. 1, 85-101. (2005) 17-26. Beliefs Oxford, R. L. (1990). Language learning strategies: What every teacher should know. Rowley, MA: (2004). Newbury House. Oxford, R. L. (2002). Language learning strategies in a 5, 113-132. nutshell: Update and ESL suggestions. In J. C. (2003). Richards & W. A. Renandya (Eds.), Methodology in PC language teaching: An anthology of current practice 2003 PC 69-72. (pp.124-132). Cambridge, England: Cambridge (2000). Strategies University Press. SILL Rasekh, Z. E., & Ranjbary, R. (2003). Metacognitive STEP BULIETIN 12, Strategy Training for Vocabulary Learning. TESL-EJ, 142-153. 7/2. Retrieved November 24, 2003, from J. V. (Ed.) (1999). http://www-writing.berkeley.edu/tesl-ej/ej26/a5.ht ml. Rubin, J. (1975). What the good language learner can (2003). teach us. TESOL Quarterly, 9, 41-51. Skehan, P. (1989). Individual differences in 2, 17-26. second-language learning. London: Edward Arnold. (2003). (2005). http://www.mext.go.jp/b_menu/houdou/15/03/030331 02.pdf (2006 11 22 ) 31, 12, 59-78. (2003). Vandergrift, L. (1997). The Comprehension Strategies of Etudes didactiques Second Language (French) Listeners: A Descriptive du FLE au Japon, 12, 68-87. Naiman, N., Fröhlich, M., Stern, H., & Todesco, A. (1978), The good second language learner: Research in education series No.7 (Revised version published in Study. Foreign Language Annals, 30, 387-409. (2003). 52, 1-18. 1995). Toronto: The Ontario Institute for Studies in Education. O Malley, J. M., Chamot, A. U., & Kupper, L. (1989). (Received : January 10, 2007) (Issued in internet Edition : February 1, 2007) Listening comprehension strategies in second language acquisition. Applied Linguistics, 10, 418-437. O Malley, J. M., & Chamot, A. U. (1990). Learning strategies in second language acquisition. New York: Cambridge University Press. 700