evidence-based mind were significantly higher in the nurses working in hospitals with <500 beds than in the nurses working in hospitals with >500 beds

Similar documents
大阪医科大学看護研究雑誌第 9 巻 (2019 年 3 月 ) 研究報告 看護学生と臨床看護師の学習スタイルと批判的思考態度の特徴および関係性 A Study on Characteristics and Relationships of Learning Styles and Dispositio

The Journal of the Japan Academy of Nursing Administration and Policies Vol 12, No 1, pp 49 59, 2008 資料 看護師におけるメンタリングとキャリア結果の関連 Relationship between M


Ⅱ. 用語の操作的定義 Ⅲ. 対象と方法 1. 対象 WAM NET 2. 調査期間 : 3. 調査方法 4. 調査内容 5. 分析方法 FisherMann-Whitney U Kruskal-Wallis SPSS. for Windows 6. 倫理的配慮 Vol. No.

doi: /jjsnr 研究報告 - 2 Reality Shock in Nurses in their Second Year after Graduation Yoko Suzuki Yoshiko Kawatsu Key Words nurse, r

Ⅰ. 緒言 Suzuki, et al., Ⅱ. 研究方法 1. 対象および方法 1 6 表 1 1, 調査票の内容 図

J. Jpn. Acad. Nurs. Sci. 35: (2015)

日本看護管理学会誌15-2

Web Stamps 96 KJ Stamps Web Vol 8, No 1, 2004

療養病床に勤務する看護職の職務関与の構造分析

<8EAD89AE91E58A778A778F708CA48B868B C91E634378D862E696E6462>

32-1_会告.indd

...Q.....\1_4.ai





Perspective-Taking Perspective-Taking.... Vol. No.

Elmore & Pohlmann Greenwood & Ramagli a b c a b c

OJT Planned Happenstance

Ⅱ 方法と対象 1. 所得段階別保険料に関する情報の収集 ~3 1, 分析手法

JR55-02.R..ec6

02総福研-06_辻.indd

JJRM5005/04.短報.責了.indd

先端社会研究 ★5★号/4.山崎

THE JAPANESE JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY 2007, Vol. 15 No. 2, 217–227

Yamagata Journal of Health Sciences, Vol. 16, 2013 Tamio KEITOKU 1 2 Katsuko TANNO 3 Kiyoko ARIMA 4 Noboru CHIBA 1 Abstract The present study aimed to

理科教育学研究

パーソナリティ研究 2005 第13巻 第2号 170–182

_原著03_濱田_責.indd

02[ ]小山・池田(責)岩.indd


46

272 11) 12) 1 Barrera 13) 1fl social embeddedness 2fl perceived support 3fl enacted support 3 14) 15) 3 2fl 13) 16;17) 1 14;15;18 21) 2 22;23) 4 24;25


220 28;29) 30 35) 26;27) % 8.0% 9 36) 8) 14) 37) O O 13 2 E S % % 2 6 1fl 2fl 3fl 3 4

The Japanese Journal of Health Psychology, 29(S): (2017)

56

MV X 5 6 Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events Grade 1 Grade Gy 16 QOL QOL 5 6 7, 8 9, VOL.3 NO

医学紀要011-渡邊.indd

Ⅲ. 研究方法 1. 文献検索の方法 Web CiNii Articles Google Scholar 分析と方法 1 表 1 2 表 2 3. 用語の定義 Ⅳ. 結果 1. 退院後の母乳育児支援に関する


ec6

qx

Visual Evaluation of Polka-dot Patterns Yoojin LEE and Nobuko NARUSE * Granduate School of Bunka Women's University, and * Faculty of Fashion Science,


HP HP ELF 7 52

01-譴カ蜴・-8.fm

<95DB8C9288E397C389C88A E696E6462>

The Japanese Journal of Psychology 1984, Vol. 55, No. 3, Effects of self-disclosure on interpersonal attraction Masahiko Nakamura (Department

1. 緒言 p 問題の所在 ) p

12 Vol. 12, No Benner 8 ICU 1 2 ICU Krippendorff, K ICU 5

07-内田 fm

17 The Analysis of Hand-Writing datas for pen-input character boxes

untitled

Japanese Journal of Applied Psychology

untitled

05_小田眞幸 様.indd

‰gficŒõ/’ÓŠ¹

11号02/百々瀬.indd

Newgarten, BL., Havighrst, RJ., & Tobin, S.Life Satisfaction Index-A LSIDiener. E.,Emmons,R.A.,Larsen,R.J.,&Griffin,S. The Satisfaction With Life Scal


ABSTRACT


九州大学学術情報リポジトリ Kyushu University Institutional Repository 看護師の勤務体制による睡眠実態についての調査 岩下, 智香九州大学医学部保健学科看護学専攻 出版情報 : 九州大学医学部保健学

26 1 : Self - reported Practices of Cancer Pain Management among Nurses in Tohoku University Hospital Hideyuki Hira

Bull. of Nippon Sport Sci. Univ. 47 (1) Devising musical expression in teaching methods for elementary music An attempt at shared teaching

7 2000b 2000b 2000b A Vol 8, No 2,

2 The Bulletin of Meiji University of Integrative Medicine 3, Yamashita 10 11

udc-3.dvi

05_藤田先生_責

<30315F985F95B65F90B490852E696E6464>

20 Japanese Journal of Educational Psychology, 1989, 37, 20 \28 THE WILLINGNESS OF SELF-DISCLOSURE AND THE DEVIATION FROM NORMATIVE SELF-DISCLOSURE IN

Adult Attachment Projective AAP PARS PARS PARS PARS Table

Kyushu Communication Studies 第2号

language anxiety :, language-skill-specific anxiety Cheng, Horwitz, & Schallert, Horwitz et al. Foreign Language Classroom Anxiety ScaleFLCAS Young, ;

_念3)医療2009_夏.indd


The Journal of the Japan Academy of Nursing Administration and Policies Vol 7, No 2, pp 19 _ 30, 2004 Survey on Counseling Services Performed by Nursi


Human Welfare 8‐1☆/5.林

若者の親子・友人関係とアイデンティティ

+深見将志.indd

短距離スプリントドリルが大学生野球選手の短距離走速度向上に与える効果

原 著 放射線皮膚炎に対する保湿クリームの効果 耳鼻科領域の頭頸部照射の患者に保湿クリームを使用して * 要旨 Gy Key words はじめに 1 70Gy 2 2 QOL


<95DB8C9288E397C389C88A E696E6462>

No.3 14

ñ{ï 01-65


大学野球の期分けにおける一般的準備期のランニング トレーニングが試合期の大学生投手の実戦状況下 パフォーマンスに与える影響

17.indd

) 5 Lawton QOL 4 4 QOL Lawton 4) Philadelphia Geriatric Center Affect Rating ScaleARS ARS QOL 5) HDS R

スポーツ教育学研究(2013. Vol.33, No1, pp.1-13)

pp a p p. 6 45

DAY )

The Japanese Journal of Psychology 1991, Vol. 62, No. 3, A study on the reliability and validity of a scale to measure shyness as a trait Atsu

Vol. 48 No. 4 Apr LAN TCP/IP LAN TCP/IP 1 PC TCP/IP 1 PC User-mode Linux 12 Development of a System to Visualize Computer Network Behavior for L

SOM SOM(Self-Organizing Maps) SOM SOM SOM SOM SOM SOM i

56 56 The Development of Preschool Children s Views About Conflict Resolution With Peers : Diversity of changes from five-year-olds to six-year-olds Y

Transcription:

研究報告 看護師の学習スタイルと批判的思考態度の特徴および関連性 A Study on Learning Style and Critical Thinking Disposition of Nurses Characteristics and Relationship between Learning Style and Critical Thinking Disposition 真継和子 1), 池西悦子 2), 山下哲平 2), 田村由美 3) Kazuko Matsugi 1),Etsuko Ikenishi 2),Teppei Yamashita 2),Yumi Tamura 3) キーワード : 学習スタイル, 批判的思考態度, 看護師 Key Words : learning style, critical thinking disposition, nurses 抄録 [] [] 225 [] 500 500 [ ] Abstract Objective: This study aimed to define the relation between the learning style of nurses and their critical thinking dispositions (CTDs). Methods: A survey based on self-administered questionnaires was conducted on nurses in the Kinki area. The questionnaires featured items on personality, Learning Style Inventory, and CTDs. Data obtained from 225 subjects were statistically analyzed. Results: Most of the surveyed participants were divergers (diverging style). CTDs included thinking over carefully inquiring mind objectivity and awareness of logical thinking. The total scores for awareness of logical thinking and objectivity were significantly higher in the executives than in the staff nurses. The total scores for inquiring mind and 1) 大阪医科大学看護学部,2) 滋慶医療科学大学院大学,3) 日本赤十字看護大学 43

evidence-based mind were significantly higher in the nurses working in hospitals with <500 beds than in the nurses working in hospitals with >500 beds. We also focused on the relations between the CTDs and diverging style and between the CTDs and well-balanced style, and we found that there is little difference between the two. Conclusion: The study results suggest that the diverging style of subjects reflects on their nursing profession, their job status, and the size of the organization they belong to. Ⅰ. はじめに 2011 2014 2015 Gibbs Gibbs, 1988 2012 Alfalo-Lefevre, 1995/1996 2005 30 Ⅱ. 研究目的 44

表 1 4 収束型 converging style 拡散型 diverging style 同化型 assimilating style 適応型 accommodating style Ⅲ. 用語の定義 1. 学習スタイル converging style diverging style assimilating style accommodating stylekolb, 1984 表 1 2. 批判的思考態度 2004 Ⅳ. 研究方法 1. 対象者 2. 調査方法 49 33 54 3 215 50 145 3. 調査期間 2015 6 1 9 31 4. 調査手順 1 5. 分析方法 IBM SPSS Statistics Version 20.0 5% 45

4CE: concrete experience, RO: reflective observation, AC: abstract conceptualization, AE: active experimentation AC-CE AE-RO 4 図 1 49 4 2004 2 t Turkey 6. 倫理的配慮 経験する CE: concrete perience 調節型 拡散型 AE: active experimentation 行動する RO: reflective observation 内省する 収束型 同化型 AC: abstract conceptualization 思考する 図 1 46

Ⅴ. 結果 283 70.8 225 79.5 1. 対象者の背景 表 230 149 66.2% 0357.8 6.97 32 14.2% 193 85.8% 500 3616.0%500 18684.0% 14464.0% 8136.0% 2. 学習スタイル 図 2 4 90.7% 49 24 10.7%8 10 3. 批判的思考態度尺度 0.888 表 3 表 4 53 142 98.1 16.97 4 18 61 36.2 6.71 10 5030.8 8.20 13 32 22.3 3.80 3 158.9 2.40 表 2 n=225 カテゴリー 人数 % 30 31 40 41 50 51 3 3 5 5 10 10 15 15 500 500 149 50 17 9 46 48 64 38 29 32 193 36 189 144 81 66.2 22.2 7.6 4.0 20.4 21.3 28.4 16.9 12.9 14.2 85.8 16.0 84.0 64.0 36.0 47

図 2 表 3 n=225 下位尺度平均値標準偏差 36.2 30.8 22.3 8.9 98.2 6.71 8.20 3.80 2.36 17.10 4 0.4 24 4 128.59%2 12.80%37.81%46.58% 55.78 17 210 7 3 4 表 5 Cronbach s 0.85 0.75 0.69 表 6 2 40.3 8.06 35.5 6.22 p=0.002 23.9 4.05 22.1 3.71 p=0.009 500 500 2 50036.1 8.67 50029.8 7.73500 p 0.001 50010.3 2.085008.6 2.32500 p 0.001 500 48

49 表 4 n=255 No. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 2.44 2.45 2.67 2.84 2.81 2.66 2.83 2.90 2.80 3.22 3.14 2.75 2.68 1.07 1.12 0.96 1.11 1.06 1.00 1.18 1.07 1.10 1.09 1.04 1.10 0.9114 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 3.37 3.46 2.72 3.18 3.04 3.12 2.94 3.04 2.92 2.96 1.23 1.13 1.33 1.18 1.27 1.27 1.17 1.04 1.12 1.3024 25 26 27 28 29 30 3.29 3.49 3.43 2.84 2.79 3.34 3.16 0.98 0.88 0.95 1.15 1.17 1.05 1.1131 32 33 2.71 3.32 2.86 1.19 0.94 1.22 98.16 17.10 2.98

-.190 倫理的思72017 3 表 5 12 28 31 考23 7 熟.802.788.762.759.704 -.080 -.048 -.010.111.002.034.082.087 -.008.158.056.162 -.016 -.002.090 25.578 -.251.053.086 18.517.371 -.078 求21 22 17 19 心14 -.135 探 -.111 -.231 -.148.087.270.825.764.721.663.597 -.009 -.058.188.067 -.023.071.238 -.058.075.039 16.336.573 -.222.036 20.291.538.048 観24 4 26 性32 -.018 客.305 -.293 -.034.164 -.211 -.214.210.132.869.699.669.640 -.003.298 -.076 -.163 15 -.041.438.530 11 9 2 考5.190.067.161.101 -.093.311.143 -.137 -.126.099.033 -.226.657.613.613.609 6 -.203.405.032.569 28.59 12.80 7.81 6.58 55.78.50 -.10.18.16.08 -.06 50

31 31 40 41 50 51 3 3 5 5 10 10 15 15 500 500 表 6 35.8 6.48 36.5 6.41 37.6 7.50 38.6 10.26 35.6 6.10 35.0 6.59 36.5 6.52 37.1 7.25 37.3 7.55 40.3 8.06 p=0.002 35.5 6.22 36.4 8.70 36.2 6.29 36.3 6.89 36.1 6.42 30.1 8.13 32.5 8.49 31.7 9.00 30.7 8.20 31.3 8.69 28.8 7.74 30.6 7.63 32.3 8.95 31.5 8.29 32.9 8.68 30.4 8.09 36.1 8.67 p 0.001 29.8 7.73 30.4 7.81 31.4 8.88 22.2 3.86 22.4 3.82 23.2 3.30 22.9 3.80 22.1 3.56 21.8 3.69 22.4 4.01 22.9 4.17 22.6 3.47 23.9 4.05 p=0.009 22.1 3.71 23.2 3.77 22.2 3.80 22.2 3.96 22.5 3.52 8.7 2.27 9.0 2.60 9.5 1.91 8.9 2.36 8.5 2.17 8.5 2.19 9.2 2.37 9.1 2.56 9.2 2.59 9.4 2.48 8.8 2.33 10.3 2.08 p 0.001 8.6 2.32 9.0 2.33 8.7 2.41 Turkey 1500 2 4. 学習スタイルと批判的思考態度の関連 2 4 p=0.004 p=0.05 p=0.026 Ⅵ. 考察 1. 学習スタイルと批判的思考態度の特徴 diverging style Kolb, 1984 2014 Kolb 20013 4 2 4 51

52 Kolb, 1984 PBL 4 1 2015 2. おかれた環境による批判的思考態度への影響 2016 2013 500 500 500 500 2016 114.2 12.74 98.1 16.9720 2006 2015 reflection 2011

2016 2015 3. 学習スタイルと批判的思考態度の関連 4 8 10 4. 教育方法への示唆 2005 2015 Kolb, 2001 Ⅶ. 結論 4 500 500 500 Ⅷ. 研究の限界 謝辞 利益相反 H26 28 C ICT 26463266 引用文献 Alfaro-Lefevre R 1995 1996 2005 2 1197-212 Gibbs G (1988) : Learning by Doing: A Guided to teaching and learning Method. Oxford Further Education Unit, Oxford. 53

2004 52 186-198 2007 23 105-126 2012 22 289 20143 pp55-81 2016 26 178 2015 24 27-12 Kolb DA (1984) : Experiential Learning: Experience as the Source of Learning and Development, New Jersey, Prentice Hall. Kolb DA, Boyatzis Re, Mainemelis C (2001) : Experiential learning theory: Previous research and new directions. In R.J. Sternberg and L-F. Zhang (eds.) Perspectives on Thinking, Learning and Cognitive Style. Mahwah, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum 2015 1 45 198-201 2005 6 2005 8 24 2011 2015 20 133-38 2016 26 111-33 2012 35 179-88 2013 4 2014 10 143-47 Richard LF, Shirley AR (1997) : Learning Style of Political Science Students. Political Science & Politics, 30(4), 732-737 2006PBL 8 69-74 2016 64 288-92 54