日本化学療法学会雑誌第59巻第5号

Similar documents
日本化学療法学会雑誌第57巻第6号

日本化学療法学会雑誌第60巻第4号

Feb THE JAPANESE JOURNAL OF ANTIBIOTICS Tebipenem pivoxil 1 1, Meiji Seika 2 Meiji Seika G 3 Meiji Seika Tebipen

日本化学療法学会雑誌第56巻第1号

日本化学療法学会雑誌第65巻第4号

日本化学療法学会雑誌第55巻第S-1号

THE JAPANESE JOURNAL OF ANTIBIOTICS 68 3 June 2015 Streptococcus pneumoniae, Haemophilus influenzae, Moraxella catarrhalis % 2 S. pneumon

208 ( 2 ) THE JAPANESE JOURNAL OF ANTIBIOTICS 63 _ 3 June 2010 Cefditoren pivoxil (CDTR-PI) MS MS 10%

日本化学療法学会雑誌第54巻第S-1号

日本化学療法学会雑誌第61巻第6号

日本化学療法学会雑誌第56巻第S-1号

日本化学療法学会雑誌第50巻第6号

日本化学療法学会雑誌第64巻第4号

日本化学療法学会雑誌第57巻第4号

CHEMOTHERAPY

CHEMOTHERAPY FEB Table 1. Activity of cefpirome and others against clinical isolates

VOL. 34 S-2 CHEMOTH8RAPY 913

日本化学療法学会雑誌第58巻第4号

日本化学療法学会雑誌第56巻第3号

CHEMOTHERAPY JUNE 1993 Table 1. Background of patients in pharmacokinetic study

VOL. 40 S- 1 Table 1. Susceptibility of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus to meropenem Table 2. Coagulase typing of methicillin-resistant St

Fig. 1 Chemical structure of norfioxacin (AM-715)

Key words : 7432-S, Oral cephem, Urinary tract infection Fig. 1. Chemical structure of 7432-S.

CHEMOTHERAPY Table 1 Clinical effect of Sultamicillin

Table 1. Antibacterial activitiy of grepafloxacin and other antibiotics against clinical isolates

CHEMOTHERAPY aureus 0.10, Enterococcus faecalis 3.13, Escherichia coli 0.20, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Enterobacter spp., Serratia marcescens 0.78, Prote

VOL.42 S-1


CHEMOTHERAPY NOV S. aureus, S. epidermidis, E. coli, K. pgeumoniae, E. cloacae, S. marcescens, P. mirabilis, Proteus, P. aeruginosa Inoculum siz

CHEMOTHERAPY Fig. 1 Chemical structure of CXM-AX

CHEMOTHERAPY MAY. 1988

VOL. 23 NO. 3 CHEMOTHERAPY 1067 Table 2 Sensitivity of gram positive cocci isolated from various diagnostic materials Table 3 Sensitivity of gram nega

180 ( 64 ) THE JAPANESE JOURNAL OF ANTIBIOTICS June 2011 A b group A Streptococcus: GAS GAS 10 meta-analysis 1) 2,3) GAS potential pathogens Tab


VOL.35 S-2 CHEMOTHERAPY Table 1 Sex and age distribution Table 2 Applications of treatment with carumonam Table 3 Concentration of carumonam in human

日本化学療法学会雑誌第57巻第5号

THE JAPANESE JOURNAL OF ANTIBIOTICS 65 6 Dec DNA 2, , % 1.65% 1.17% 90% 9 Escherichia coli -

CHEMOTHERAPY JUN Citrobacter freundii 27, Enterobacter aerogenes 26, Enterobacter cloacae 27, Proteus rettgeri 7, Proteus inconstans 20, Proteus

pneumoniae 30, C. freundii 32, E. aerogenes 27, E. cloacae 32, P. mirabilis 31, P. vulgaris 34, M. morganii 32, S. marcescens 31, H. influenzae 27, P.

Table 1. Antibacterial spectrum SBT ABPC ABPC CPZ : sulbactamiampicillin : ampicillin : cefoperazone

日本化学療法学会雑誌第51巻第2号

Fig. 1 Chemical structure of DL-8280

CHEMOTHERAPY

coccus aureus Corynebacterium sp, Haemophilus parainfluenzae Klebsiella pneumoniae Pseudornonas aeruginosa Pseudomonas sp., Xanthomonas maltophilia, F

CHEMOTHERAPY Methicillin-resistant S.aureus(MRSA) coccus epidermidis 105 Streptococcus pyogenes E.faecali senterococcus avium Enterococcus faecium Str


THE JAPANESE JOURNAL OF ANTIBIOTICS 65 6 Dec LVFX 100 mg 3 / mg 2 / LVFX PK PD mg mg 1 1 AUC/MIC



日本化学療法学会雑誌第58巻第2号


Fig. 1 Chemical structure of KW-1070

cover



日本化学療法学会雑誌第54巻第S-1号

Table 1 Classification of female patients with vesical irritating symptom by their signs : Urinary pain with or without other vesical irritability. s

Staphylococcus sp. K.pneumoniae P.mirabilis C.freundii E. cloacae Serratia sp. P. aeruginosa ml, Enterococcus avium >100ƒÊg/ml

Dec. THE JAPANESE JOURNAL OF ANTIBIOTICS XXXVII (45)

CHEMOTHERAPY

日本化学療法学会雑誌第57巻第1号

日本化学療法学会雑誌第58巻第S-2号

小児感染症分離株における感受性サーベイランス

Fig.2. Sensitivity distribution of clinical isolates of S. epidermidis (24 strains, 106 CFU/ml) Staphylococcus aureus Staphylococcus epider- midis Ent

日本職業・災害医学会会誌第51巻第1号

epidermidis, Enterococcus faecalis, Enterococcus Klebsiella pneumoniae, Proteus mirabilis, indolepositive Proteus spp., Enterobacter spp., Serratia


VOL.30 S-1 CHEMOTHERAPY Table 1 Antibacterial activity of CTT against standard strains Table 2 Antibacterial activity of CTT against standard strains

Fig.1 Chemical structure of BAY o 9867

日本化学療法学会雑誌第54巻第1号

CHEMOTHERAPY APR. 1984


2 2 THE JAPANESE JOURNAL OF ANTIBIOTICS 69 1 Feb Neisseria gonorrhoeae ceftriaxone CTRX % 2010 CTRX 20 FQ staphylococci, E. faecium, N.

1272 CHEMOTHERAPY MAR. 1975

Table1MIC of BAY o 9867 against standard strains


日本化学療法学会雑誌第61巻第4号

橡

VOL.42 S-1 methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus (MSSA), Staphylococcus epidermidis, Enterococcus faecalis, Escherichia coli, Klebsiella pneum


Key words: bacterial meningitis, Haemophilus influenzae type b, Streptococcus pneumoniae, rapid diagnosis, childhood


Key words: Antibodies to Leptospira, Tokyo, Uveitis


_02三浦.indd

日本化学療法学会雑誌第57巻第S-2号

VOL. 23 NO. 3 CHEMOTHERAPY 1379 Table 1 Susceptibility of clinical isolated strains to Tobramycin

VOL.47 NO.5 Table 1. Susceptibility distribution of Ĉ- lactams against clinical isolates of MRSA MRSA: rnethicillin- resistant Staphylococcus aureus

untitled

2108 CHEMOTHERAPY SEPT Table 1 Antimicrobial spectrum Fig. 1

Fig. 1 Chemical structure of TE-031 Code number: TE-031 Chemical name: (-) (3R, 4S, 5S, 6R, 7R, 9R, 11R, 12R, 13S, 14R)-4-[(2, 6-dideoxy-3-C-methyl-3-

小児感染免疫第25巻第2号

Clostridium difficile ciprofloxacin, ofloxacin, norfloxacin Bifidobacterium Lactobacillus Lactobacillus Bacteroides fragilis B. fragilis C. difficile

THE JAPANESE JOURNAL OF ANTIBIOTICS 48-8 Enterococcus avium 5Š, Corynebacterium xerosis 10Š, Corynebacterium pseudodiphtheriticum 10Š, Corynebacterium


CHEMOTHERAPY DEC phvlococcus aureus Staphylococcus Enterococcus faecalis Escherichia Klebsiella pneumoniae Serratia marcescens Pseudomonas cepac

Table 1. Concentration of ritipenem in plasma, gallbladder tissue and bile after ritipenem acoxil administration (200 mg t.i.d., 3 days) N.D.: not det

Fig. 1 Table l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l

DIC vegetation 1 nonbacterial thrombogenic e

(J. Yamashina Inst. Ornithol.), 25: 76-92, 1993 Breeding Biology of Dryocopus martius in Central Hokkaido Hirotomi Konishi*, Toshioki Suzuki*, Katsumi

Transcription:

Streptococcus pneumoniae Haemophilus influenzae Moraxella catarrhalis S. pneumoniae H. influenzae M. catarrhalis S. pneumoniae H. influenzae M. catarrhalis S. pneumoniae H. influenzae M. catarrhalis

S. pneumoniae μ μ μ H. influenzae μ β μ β μ Key words Streptococcus pneumoniae Haemophilus influenzae Moraxella catarrhalis S. pneumoniae H. influenzae S. pneumoniae H. influenzae β β β S. pneumoniae H. influenzae M. catarrhalis I

S. pneumoniae H. influenzae M. catarrhalis Streptococcus pyogenes S. pneumoniae H. influenzae M. catarrhalis S. pyogenes S. pneumoniae μ μ μ H. influenzae β β μ β μ β μ χ II

Cases collected 207 Safety analysis 167 Cases excluded from safety analysis 40 Reason for exclusion No visit after prescription 18 Violation of inclusion criteria 3 Frequency of administration ( 2 days) 19 Cases excluded from efficacy analysis 42 Reason for exclusion Administration inadequate ( 3 days) 4 Efficacy unassessable 3 Concomitant topical antibiotics 35 Efficacy analysis 125 Fig. 1. Case breakdown. Table 1. Subject summaries Item Category Cases % Cases examined 167 100 Gender male 86 51.5 female 81 48.5 Age (years) 0 12 7.2 1 30 18.0 2 24 14.4 3 30 18.0 4 6 41 24.6 6 8 18 10.8 8 11 12 7.2 mean SD 3.5 2.4 Body weight (kg) 5 10 29 17.4 10 15 59 35.3 15 20 57 34.1 20 22 13.2 mean SD 15.5 6.6 Severity before administration mild 30 18.0 moderate 96 57.5 severe 41 24.6 Infected site right 78 46.7 left 65 38.9 both 24 14.4 Concomitant use of Incident frequency First time 116 69.5 gastrointestinal drugs Recurrent 51 30.5 recurrent acute otitis media 17 33.3 other 34 66.7 Daily dosage rounded off to one dosage Frequency of administration per day/body weight. One case discontinuated the drug for 3 days (total duration of exposure: 8 days). Item Category Cases % Onset time 0 day 91 54.5 1 day before 58 34.7 2 days before 14 8.4 3 days before 2 1.2 4 days before 2 1.2 mean SD 1.6 0.9 Antibiotics administered within 1 month no 146 87.4 yes 21 12.6 Daily dosage (mg/kg) 15 22 13.2 15 101 60.5 15 44 26.3 mean SD 15.3 1.5 Frequency of administration per day Duration of administration (days) Once 0 0.0 Twice 0 0.0 Three times 167 100.0 mean SD 3.0 0 1 3 4 2.4 4 7 74 44.3 8 14 81 48.5 15 21 8 4.8 mean SD 8.0 3.4 no 117 70.1 yes 49 29.3 unknown 1 0.6

Table 2. Clinical efficacy by background data Clinical efficacy Efficacy Item Category Cases excellent good fair poor (%) Cases examined 125 80 35 4 6 92.0 Result ( 2 test) Age (years) 0 6 2 2 0 2 66.7 0.1926 1 25 14 9 0 2 92.0 2 19 13 4 1 1 89.5 3 20 13 7 0 0 100.0 4 6 31 23 5 2 1 90.3 6 8 15 9 6 0 0 100.0 8 11 9 6 2 1 0 88.9 mean SD 3.5 2.4 Severity before administration mild 23 19 4 0 0 100.0 0.2327 moderate 73 43 22 4 4 89.0 severe 29 18 9 0 2 93.1 Incident frequency First time 95 59 28 3 5 91.6 1.0000 Recurrent 30 21 7 1 1 93.3 recurrent acute otitis media 14 7 5 1 1 85.7 0.2092 other 16 14 2 0 0 100.0 Risk factors Day care attendance no 52 32 17 1 2 94.2 0.9868 nursery 33 20 11 1 1 93.9 kindergarten 20 17 2 0 1 95.0 unknown 20 11 5 2 2 80.0 Sib no 29 16 9 2 2 86.2 0.1885 yes 71 49 19 0 3 95.8 unknown 25 15 7 2 1 88.0 Swimming club no 85 55 25 1 4 94.1 1.0000 yes 6 5 1 0 0 100.0 unknown 34 20 9 3 2 85.3 Pacifier no 104 66 30 4 4 92.3 0.2337 yes 3 2 0 0 1 66.7 unknown 18 12 5 0 1 94.4 Co infection in family no 95 60 28 2 5 92.6 1.0000 yes 5 4 1 0 0 100.0 unknown 25 16 6 2 1 88.0 S. pneumoniae H. influenzae M. catarrhalis S. pyogenes S. pneumoniae H. influenzae M. catarrhalis S. pneumoniae H. influenzae M. ca-

Table 3. Clinical efficacy by causative organism Infection Causative organism Cases Clinical efficacy Efficacy excellent good fair poor (%) Monobacterial S. pneumoniae 27 22 5 0 0 100.0 PSSP 17 15 2 0 0 100.0 PISP 4 3 1 0 0 100.0 PRSP 6 4 2 0 0 100.0 H. influenzae 12 7 3 0 2 83.3 BLNAS 7 4 2 0 1 85.7 BLNAR 4 2 1 0 1 75.0 BLPAR 1 1 0 0 0 100.0 M. catarrhalis 4 2 1 1 0 75.0 S. pyogenes 0 0 0 0 0 Polybacterial S. pneumoniae H. influenzae 14 7 5 1 1 85.7 S. pneumoniae M. catarrhalis 7 3 2 1 1 71.4 S. pneumoniae S. pyogenes 0 0 0 0 0 H. influenzae M. catarrhalis 3 1 2 0 0 100.0 S. pneumoniae H. influenzae M. catarrhalis 15 7 5 1 2 80.0 Table 4. Bacteriological efficacy by causative organism Organism Strains Bacteriological efficacy Eradication eradicated decreased unchanged (%) S. pneumoniae 16 15 0 1 93.8 PSSP 10 10 0 0 100.0 PISP 3 2 0 1 66.7 PRSP 3 3 0 0 100.0 H. influenzae 10 9 0 1 90.0 BLNAS 5 5 0 0 100.0 BLNAR 4 3 0 1 75.0 BLPAR 1 1 0 0 100.0 M. catarrhalis 4 4 0 0 100.0 S. pyogenes 0 0 0 0 tarrhalis S. pyogenes S. pneumoniae H. influenzae M. catarrhalis S. pneumoniae H. influenzae M. catarrhalis S. pneumoniae H. influenzae S. pneumoniae H. influenzae M. catarrhalis S. pyogenes S. pneumoniae μ μ μ μ μ μ μ μ H. influenzae μ μ μ μ M. catarrhalis μ μ S. pyogenes μ

Other 27.5% S. pneumoniae 27.2% PRSP 18.9% PISP 32.6 % PSSP 48.4% Strains examined 95 S. pyogenes 0.9% S. aureus 8.9% M. catarrhalis 12.9% H. influenzae 22.6% BLPAR 8.9% BLNAR 44.3% BLNAS 46.8% Strains examined 349 Cases examined 175 Strains examined 79 Fig. 2. Distribution Causative-organism. III S. pneumoniae S. pneumoniae H. influenzae M. catarrhalis S. pneumoniae H. influenzae M. catarrhalis S. pneumoniae

Table 5. Antibiotic susceptibility by causative organism MIC ( g/ml) Causative organism Strains Antibiotics range MIC50 MIC90 S. pneumoniae 95 FRPM 0.06 0.5 0.06 0.5 AMPC 0.06 2 0.06 1 CDTR 0.06 8 0.25 1 CFPN 0.06 8 0.5 1 CFDN 0.06 32 1 8 PCG 0.06 4 0.12 2 PSSP 46 FRPM 0.06 0.06 0.06 AMPC 0.06 0.06 0.06 CDTR 0.06 0.25 0.12 0.25 CFPN 0.06 0.5 0.25 0.5 CFDN 0.06 1 0.5 0.5 PCG 0.06 0.06 0.06 PISP 31 FRPM 0.06 0.25 0.12 0.25 AMPC 0.06 1 0.25 1 CDTR 0.12 8 0.5 1 CFPN 0.12 4 0.5 4 CFDN 0.25 32 2 8 PCG 0.12 1 0.5 1 PRSP 18 FRPM 0.12 0.5 0.5 0.5 AMPC 0.5 2 1 2 CDTR 0.5 8 0.5 1 CFPN 0.5 8 0.5 1 CFDN 2 32 4 8 PCG 2 4 2 4 H. influenzae 79 FRPM 0.12 4 1 4 AMPC 0.2564 2 16 CDTR 0.06 0.5 0.12 0.25 CFPN 0.06 8 1 4 CFDN 0.25 32 4 8 ABPC 0.12128 2 16 CVA/AMPC 0.25 16 1 8 BLNAS 37 FRPM 0.12 2 0.25 1 AMPC 0.25 1 0.5 1 CDTR 0.06 0.25 0.06 0.12 CFPN 0.06 2 0.06 1 CFDN 0.25 4 0.5 4 ABPC 0.12 1 0.5 1 CVA/AMPC 0.25 1 0.5 1 BLNAR 35 FRPM 0.5 4 4 4 AMPC 2 16 8 16 CDTR 0.12 0.5 0.25 0.5 CFPN 0.25 8 2 4 CFDN 2 32 8 8 ABPC 2 16 4 8 CVA/AMPC 2 16 8 16 BLPAR 7 FRPM 0.25 4 2 4 AMPC 1664 64 64 CDTR 0.06 0.5 0.25 0.5 CFPN 0.06 4 2 4 CFDN 0.25 8 8 8 ABPC 16128 128 128 CVA/AMPC 0.5 16 8 16 M. catarrhalis 45 FRPM 0.06 1 0.5 0.5 AMPC 0.5 16 4 16 CDTR 0.06 1 0.5 1 CFPN 0.06 1 0.5 1 CFDN 0.12 0.5 0.25 0.5 S. pyogenes 3 FRPM 0.06 0.06 0.06 AMPC 0.06 0.06 0.06 CDTR 0.06 0.06 0.06 CFPN 0.06 0.06 0.06 CFDN 0.06 0.06 0.06

Gender Age (years) Daily Dose (mg/kg) Duration of administration (days) Table 6. Adverse diarrhea reaction FRPM administration Duration of administration until ADR (days) Days required for outcome (days) Outcome Concomitant use of gastrointestinal drugs male 0 15.0 8 Unknown for no 5 Unknown Unknown No visit after ADR male 0 13.5 3 Discontinued 2 3 Improved No female 1 15.0 4 Discontinued 3 6 Recovered Antibiotic-resistant lactic acid bacteria female 2 14.5 4 Discontinued 2 5 Recovered Antibiotic-resistant lactic acid bacteria female 3 16.1 3 Discontinued 2 7 Recovered No female 4 15.0 7 Discontinued 4 1 Recovered No male 4 15.0 6 Discontinued 5 5 Recovered Antibiotic-resistant lactic acid bacteria male 10 15.0 4 Discontinued 2 1 Improved No MedDRA/J 12.1 Difficult 4.6% Moderate 33.3% Impossible 0% Very good 22.2% Good 39.8% Cases examined 108 Fig. 3. Palatability Drug. H. influenzae M. catarrhalis S. pneumoniae H. influenzae M. catarrhalis S. pneumoniae H. influenzae S. pneumoniae H. influenzae S. pneumoniae μ μ μ μ S. pneumoniae μ μ μ μ S. pneumoniae S. pneumoniae H. influenzae μ μ

H. influenzae H. influenzae

Streptococcus pneumoniae Haemophilus influenzae Moraxella catarrhalis S. pneumoniae H. influenzae M. catarrhalis S. pneumoniae μ S. pneumoniae μ S. pneumoniae μ