µ COMET LFV esys
clfv (Charged Lepton Flavor Violation) J-PARC µ COMET
( )
( )
( )
( ) B
( ) B
( ) B
( ) B
( ) B
( ) B
( ) B
2016 J- PARC µ KEK
3
3 3
3 3
3 3
3 3
3 3
clfv
clfv
clfv
clfv
clfv
clfv
clfv
clfv
clfv
clfv SM µ - e - ν µ ν e L µ 1 0 1 0 ΔL µ =0 L e 0 1 0 1 ΔL e =0 µ - A e - A L µ 1 0 0 0 ΔL µ =-1 L e 0 0 1 0 ΔL e =+1 vs µ
clfv SM ν µ µ - e - ν µ ν e m ixin g L µ 1 0 ν1 0 ΔL µ =0 L e 0 1 0 e 1 ΔL e =0 µ e µ - A e - A W (m ν /m W ) 4 L µ 1 0 0 0 ΔL µ =-1 L e 0 0 1 0 ΔL e =+1 Very Small (10-52 ) vs µ
clfv GUT LFV
@ Planck mass scale SUSY-GUT Yukawa interaction SUSY Seesaw Model Neutrino Yukawa interaction CKM matrix LFV Neutrino oscillation L.J.Hall,V.Kostelecky,S.Raby,1986;A.Masiero, F.Borzumati, 1986
clfv LHC Masiero et al. JHEP03
LHC clvf LHC+cLFV LHC clfv LHC clfv LHC clfv TeV LHC LHC+cLFV LHC upgrade, ILC
clfv g-2 Hep-ph/0607263v2 S.Antusch et al This Experiment
clfv g-2 hep-ph/0703035v2 G.Isidori et al Hep-ph/0607263v2 S.Antusch et al δ 12 LL = 10 4 and δ 23 LL = 10 2 300 GeV M~ 600 GeV This Experiment 200 GeV M 2 1000 GeV 500 GeV µ 1000 GeV 10 tan β 50 A U = 1 TeV M q = 1.5 TeV. and the GUT relations The red areas correspond to points within the funnel region which satisfy the B- physics constraints listed
clfv g-2 ~10 hep-ph/0703035v2 G.Isidori et al Hep-ph/0607263v2 S.Antusch et al δ 12 LL = 10 4 and δ 23 LL = 10 2 300 GeV M~ 600 GeV Current Bound This Experiment This Experiment 200 GeV M 2 1000 GeV 500 GeV µ 1000 GeV 10 tan β 50 A U = 1 TeV M q = 1.5 TeV. and the GUT relations The red areas correspond to points within the funnel region which satisfy the B- physics constraints listed 0.002
Muon clfv MEGA SINDRUM II MEG Los Alamos µ eγ PSI µ-e conversion PSI µ eγ RUNNING! µ (28MeV/c) ( )µ ( 52MeV/c) µ 28MeV/c 4 x 10 7 s -1 ~10 7 s -1 3 x 10 7 s -1 1995 PRD 65, 112002 1.2 10-11 EPJ C47 337-346 (2006) (Au )7 x 10-13 NP B834 (2010) 1-12 2.8 x 10-11
µ eγ µ-e conversion
µ eγ µ-e conversion µ eγ µ-e conv
µ eγ µ-e conversion µ eγ µ-e conv µ eγ µ-e conv Loop vs Tree LHC
µ eγ µ-e conversion µ eγ µ-e conv µ eγ µ-e conv Loop vs Tree LHC
µ eγ µ-e conversion Z Z µ eγ µ-e conv µ eγ µ-e conv Loop vs Tree LHC
µ-e conversion µ eγ µ eγ µ eγ µ-e conversion
µ-e conversion µ eγ µ eγ µ eγ µ-e conversion ν µ ν e? γ
µ-e conversion µ eγ µ eγ µ eγ µ-e conversion µ-e conversion µ
µ 1s Neutrino-less muon nuclear capture (=µ-e conversion) µ - + (A, Z) e - + (A,Z) µ muon decay in orbit µ e ν ν nuclear muon capture µ + ( A, Z) ν µ + ( A, Z 1) B(µ - N e - N) = Γ (µ - N e - N ) Γ ( µ - N ν N ' )
µ E µe ~ m µ -B µ m µ : µ B µ : 1s R.Kitano, M.Koike, Y.Okada P.R. D66, 096002(2002)
Mu2e @ FNAL FNAL Mu2e Experiment CD-0 Tevatron Accumulator Ring Debuncher Ring C. Bhat and M. Syphers Mu2e Acc WG meeting Mar 9,
COMET 10-16 J-PARC E21
COMET J-PARC p π µ 8GeV, ~7µA 56kW µ π µ J-PARC PAC J-PARC PAC -1 µ /
π π - +(A,Z) (A,Z-1)* γ + (A,Z-1) γ e + e -
π π - +(A,Z) (A,Z-1)* γ + (A,Z-1) γ e + e - π µν µ-e conv 0.88µs µ
π π - +(A,Z) (A,Z-1)* γ + (A,Z-1) γ e + e -
π π - +(A,Z) (A,Z-1)* γ + (A,Z-1) γ e + e -
µ 100nsec, ~1µsec - 8GeV 10 11 1.17µs (584ns x 2) 10-9 100ns 0.7 second beam spill 1.5 second accelerator cycle N bg = NP x R ext x R π-stop/p x A π x P RPC x P γ-e x A NP : total # of protons (~10 21 ) R ext : Extinction Ratio (10-9 ) R π-stop/p : π stop yield per proton (3.5 x 10-7 ) R RPC : Probability of γ from π (0.2) P γ-e : Probability of e from γ A : detector acceptance 1.4x10-5 BR=10-16, N bg ~ 0.1 Extinction < 10-9
COMET RCS: h=2 1 MR:h=8(9) 4(3) RF ON 8GeV 1.6 x 10 13 ppb, 7µA, 56kW Linac RCS
COMET RCS: h=2 1 MR:h=8(9) 4(3) RF ON 8GeV 1.6 x 10 13 ppb, 7µA, 56kW Linac RCS
COMET RCS: h=2 1 MR:h=8(9) 4(3) RF ON 8GeV 1.6 x 10 13 ppb, 7µA, 56kW Linac RCS
π π µ π Mars and PHITS
µ π µ µ Guide π s until decay to µ s Suppress high-p particles µ s : p µ < 75 MeV/c e s : pe < 100 MeV/c Beam Blocker See Classical Electrodynamics, J.D.Jackson Ch.12-Sec.4 Beam collimator
µ π µ µ Guide π s until decay to µ s Suppress high-p particles µ s : p µ < 75 MeV/c e s : pe < 100 MeV/c Beam Blocker See Classical Electrodynamics, J.D.Jackson Ch.12-Sec.4 Beam collimator
COMET ~100MeV µ µ
60-MeV/c DIO electrons µ : τ µ - = 0.88 µs 66 µ rejection ~10-6 : < 10kHz 20% 105-MeV/c µ-e electron
JPNC
2x10 7 sec Single event sensitivity N µ µ µ 2.0x10 18 fcap, µ 0.6 Ae 0.031. total protons muon yield per proton muon stopping efficiency 8.5x10 20 0.0035 0.66 # of stopped muons 2.0x10 18 Single event sensitivity 90% C.L. upper limit 2.6 x 10-17 6.0 x 10-17
2x10 7 sec Background Events Comments Radiative Pion Capture 0.05 Beam Electrons <0.1 MC stat limited Muon Decay in Flight <0.0002 Pion Decay in Flight <0.0001 Neutron Induced 0.024 For high E n Delayed-Pion Radiative Capture 0.002 Anti-proton Induced 0.007 For 8 GeV p Muon Decay in Orbit 0.15 Radiative Muon Capture <0.001 Muon Capture with n Emission <0.001 Muon Capture with Charged Part. Emission <0.001 Cosmic-Ray Muons 0.002 Electrons from Cosmic-Ray Muons 0.002 Total 0.34
2x10 7 sec Background Events Comments Radiative Pion Capture 0.05 Beam Electrons <0.1 MC stat limited Muon Decay in Flight <0.0002 Pion Decay in Flight <0.0001 Neutron Induced 0.024 For high E n Delayed-Pion Radiative Capture 0.002 Anti-proton Induced 0.007 For 8 GeV p Muon Decay in Orbit 0.15 Radiative Muon Capture <0.001 Muon Capture with n Emission <0.001 Muon Capture with Charged Part. Emission <0.001 Cosmic-Ray Muons 0.002 Electrons from Cosmic-Ray Muons 0.002 Total 0.34 < 10-9
75 35.7 17 2 3 π W 4.4 3 0.5 4.7 2.3 3 75
2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 CDR TDR π µ
2016 J-PARC µ KEK J-PARC clfv COMET KEK