EOS EOS

1401_HPCI-lecture4.SNEOS.pptx

極限物質の性質を決めるには? 超新星 : 状態方程式データテーブル 中性子星と超新星の状態方程式 中性子星 密度のみの関数 ほぼ中性子物質 ゼロ温度 冷えた中性子星 多くの状態方程式 原子核実験 中性子星質量 半径 超新星 密度だけでなく 電子の割合が変わる 有限温度 超新星爆発時 少ないデータテーブル 数値シミュレーション 中性子星合体にも 極限状態での物質の性質 状態方程式 (Equation

PowerPoint Presentation

2010 KEK (Japan) (Japan) (Japan) Cheoun, Myun -ki Soongsil (Korea) Ryu,, Chung-Yoe Soongsil (Korea) 1. S.Reddy, M.Prakash and J.M. Lattimer, P.R.D58 #013009 (1998) Magnetar : ~ 10 15 G ~ 10 17 19 G (?)

1401_HPCI-lecture3.EOS.pptx

極限物質の性質を決めるには? 中性子星 : 状態方程式の基本 Hubble Sees Bare Neutron Star Streaking Across Space Isolated neutron star: 2 light year away, 1 million year old 中性子星内部の物質 高密度物質の実験室 核物質の性質から中性子星へ 中性子星の観測から核物質を探る エネルギー

global global mass region (matter ) & (I) M3Y semi-microscopic int. Ref.: H. N., P. R. C68, ( 03) N. P. A722, 117c ( 03) Proc. of NENS03 (to be

Gogny hard core spin-isospin property @ RCNP (Mar. 22 24, 2004) Collaborator: M. Sato (Chiba U, ) ( ) global global mass region (matter ) & (I) M3Y semi-microscopic int. Ref.: H. N., P. R. C68, 014316

反D中間子と核子のエキゾチックな 束縛状態と散乱状態の解析

.... D 1 in collaboration with 1, 2, 1 RCNP 1, KEK 2 . Exotic hadron qqq q q Θ + Λ(1405) etc. uudd s? KN quasi-bound state? . D(B)-N bound state { { D D0 ( cu) B = D ( cd), B = + ( bu) B 0 ( bd) D(B)-N

2011721 Potential energy (in MeV) 10 5 0 N. Bohr and J.A. Wheeler (1939) Liquid Drop Model 92 U 98 Cf G. Flerov and K. Petrjzak Leningrad 1940 10 16 years 22 years later. Microscopic Theory Models: Macro-microscopic

1 r 8, , 238 N, Z 28, 50, 82, 126 r cm cm 3 1,000 1 s s slow s 8 s 2 2 s s * 1 * 2 * 3 1 N 50, 82, s * r

r 181 8588 2 21 1 e-mail: shinya.wanajo@nao.ac.jp r r r r r 1. r r r r r 1.1 r 1 10 107 1 7 1 r 8,000 300 232 235, 238 N, Z 28, 50, 82, 126 r 10 7 10 11 cm 3 10 25 cm 3 1,000 1 s s slow s 8 s 2 2 s s *

@ τ weak 1 σ weak n target v relative sec ( T 10MeV ) 2 ( σ weak 4G2 F h2 c 2 π T 2, n target ρ m u, v relative c ( τ dyn 1 0.4msec

@ 2011.12.26 τ weak 1 σ weak n target v relative 8 10 8 sec ( T 10MeV ) 2 ( σ weak 4G2 F h2 c 2 π T 2, n target ρ m u, v relative c ( τ dyn 1 0.4msec Gρ ) 1/2 ρ 10 14 g/cm 3 ) 1 ρ 10 14 g/cm 3 (T 10MeV,

EOS and Collision Dynamics Energy of nuclear matter E(ρ, δ)/a = E(ρ, )/A + E sym (ρ)δ 2 δ = (ρ n ρ p )/ρ 1 6 E(ρ, ) (Symmetric matter ρ n = ρ p ) E sy

Nuclear collision dynamics and the equation of state We want to measure EOS. Measure T, P and ρ of matter... Prepare matter in the state we want to measure HI collisions What are taking place in collisions?

総研大恒星進化概要.dvi

The Structure and Evolution of Stars I. Basic Equations. M r r =4πr2 ρ () P r = GM rρ. r 2 (2) r: M r : P and ρ: G: M r Lagrange r = M r 4πr 2 rho ( ) P = GM r M r 4πr. 4 (2 ) s(ρ, P ) s(ρ, P ) r L r T

ニュートリノ駆動型 超新星爆発シミュレーション ３Ｄと２Ｄの比較

2016/01/05 宇宙の歴史をひもとく地下素粒子原子核研究 第二回超新星ニュートリノ研究会 ニュートリノ観測による超新星爆発メカニズムの探求 滝脇知也 ( 理化学研究所 ) 1 2 Three phases of supernovae Presupernova phase Burst phase Accretion phase Cooling phase Kato+2015 吉田敬さん石徹白さん

1 (T 1MeV, ρ > 1 14 g/cm 3 ) τ weak τ dyn ν n ν n γ n e λ ν λ γ, λ e, λ N (neutrinosphere) 3 6 (ν e, ν e,ν µ, ν µ,ν τ, ν τ ) T < O(1MeV) = m µ n e n µ

21.3.12 @KEK H He CO ONeMg Fe Si M>8M '! " # $ % & 1 (T 1MeV, ρ > 1 14 g/cm 3 ) τ weak τ dyn ν n ν n γ n e λ ν λ γ, λ e, λ N (neutrinosphere) 3 6 (ν e, ν e,ν µ, ν µ,ν τ, ν τ ) T < O(1MeV) = m µ n e n µ,

untitled

masato@icrr.u-tokyo.ac.jp 996 Start 997 998 999 000 00 00 003 004 005 006 007 008 SK-I Accident Partial Reconstruction SK-II Full reconstruction ( SK-III ( ),46 (40%) 5,8 (9%),9 (40%) 5MeV 7MeV 4MeV(plan)

W 1983 W ± Z cm 10 cm 50 MeV TAC - ADC ADC [ (µs)] = [] (2.08 ± 0.36) 10 6 s 3 χ µ + µ 8 = (1.20 ± 0.1) 10 5 (Ge

22 2 24 W 1983 W ± Z 0 3 10 cm 10 cm 50 MeV TAC - ADC 65000 18 ADC [ (µs)] = 0.0207[] 0.0151 (2.08 ± 0.36) 10 6 s 3 χ 2 2 1 20 µ + µ 8 = (1.20 ± 0.1) 10 5 (GeV) 2 G µ ( hc) 3 1 1 7 1.1.............................

超新星残骸Cassiopeia a と 非球対称爆発

物理学専攻 松尾康秀 宇宙物理理論 指導教員 : 橋本正章 < 超新星残骸 > 星の外層が超新星爆発により吹き飛ばされ 爆発の際の衝撃波によって周囲の物質 ( 星周物質 ) を加熱し 輝いている天体 かに星雲 Kepler Cas A http://www.spacetelescope.o rg/images/large/heic0515a.j pg http://apod.nasa.gov/apod/i

23 1 Section ( ) ( ) ( 46 ) , 238( 235,238 U) 232( 232 Th) 40( 40 K, % ) (Rn) (Ra). 7( 7 Be) 14( 14 C) 22( 22 Na) (1 ) (2 ) 1 µ 2 4

23 1 Section 1.1 1 ( ) ( ) ( 46 ) 2 3 235, 238( 235,238 U) 232( 232 Th) 40( 40 K, 0.0118% ) (Rn) (Ra). 7( 7 Be) 14( 14 C) 22( 22 Na) (1 ) (2 ) 1 µ 2 4 2 ( )2 4( 4 He) 12 3 16 12 56( 56 Fe) 4 56( 56 Ni)

6 2 T γ T B (6.4) (6.1) [( d nm + 3 ] 2 nt B )a 3 + nt B da 3 = 0 (6.9) na 3 = T B V 3/2 = T B V γ 1 = const. or T B a 2 = const. (6.10) H 2 = 8π kc2

1 6 6.1 (??) (P = ρ rad /3) ρ rad T 4 d(ρv ) + PdV = 0 (6.1) dρ rad ρ rad + 4 da a = 0 (6.2) dt T + da a = 0 T 1 a (6.3) ( ) n ρ m = n (m + 12 ) m v2 = n (m + 32 ) T, P = nt (6.4) (6.1) d [(nm + 32 ] )a

/ Christopher Essex Radiation and the Violation of Bilinearity in the Thermodynamics of Irreversible Processes, Planet.Space Sci.32 (1984) 1035 Radiat

/ Christopher Essex Radiation and the Violation of Bilinearity in the Thermodynamics of Irreversible Processes, Planet.Space Sci.32 (1984) 1035 Radiation and the Continuing Failure of the Bilinear Formalism,

BH BH BH BH Typeset by FoilTEX 2

GR BH BH 2015.10.10 BH at 2015.09.07 NICT 2015.05.26 Typeset by FoilTEX 1 BH BH BH BH Typeset by FoilTEX 2 1. BH 1.1 1 Typeset by FoilTEX 3 1.2 2 A B A B t = 0 A: m a [kg] B: m b [kg] t = t f star free

ｽﾗｲﾄﾞ ﾀｲﾄﾙなし

006 8 (g cm -3 ) 1 ~10-8 cm ~10-1 cm 10 14 (n) 10 15 ~10-13 cm (p) (q) RGB uds... (contd.) 0 ~ fm np nn,pp (contd.) 1 GeV 100 GeV 1 TeV RI FAIR GSI RHIC BNL LHC CERN (contd.) T < 9 ~ 10 K (contd.) (k B

untitled

TOF ENMA JAEA-RMS) TOF Pre-scission JAERI-RMS (m-state 16 O + 27 Al 150MeV d TOF Nucl. Phys. A444, 349-364 (1985). l = m d Pre-scission Scission 10-19 (Post_scission) (Pre-scission) Proton_fission Alpha_fission

1 1-49 11 5 7064 ...4 1.1...5 1....7 1.3...8...9.1...10.1.1 Lennad-Jones...10.1....1....13.3...14.4...15.4.1 L-J...15.4. Hamonic...16.4.3 Multiple time step...16.5...17.6...19.6.1...19.7...0.7.1...0.7.

Microsoft PowerPoint - kotake

超新星爆発メカニズムの現状 固武慶 ( 国立天文台 ) 超新星爆発とニュートリノ原子核反応 阪大 RCNP 研究会 2007 年 2 月 目次及び時刻表 第 1 章 Introduction (~5 分 ) 第 2 章超新星の物理 (~5 分 ) (standard supernova scenario) 第 3 章超新星爆発メカニズム最前線 (~30 分 ) Asymmetry と爆発メカニズム

Outline I. Introduction: II. Pr 2 Ir 2 O 7 Like-charge attraction III.

Masafumi Udagawa Dept. of Physics, Gakushuin University Mar. 8, 16 @ in Gakushuin University Reference M. U., L. D. C. Jaubert, C. Castelnovo and R. Moessner, arxiv:1603.02872 Outline I. Introduction:

Microsoft PowerPoint - okamura.ppt[読み取り専用]

TKK の物理的可能性 an extension of the TK neutrino oscillation experiment with a far detector in Korea 岡村直利 ( 京大 基研 ) 関西セミナーハウス (007/03/7( 007/03/7) based on hep-ph/050406 [Phys.Lett.B637,66 (006)] hep-ph/060755

GJG160842_O.QXD

( )

1. 2. 3. 4. 5. ( ) () http://www-astro.physics.ox.ac.uk/~wjs/apm_grey.gif http://antwrp.gsfc.nasa.gov/apod/ap950917.html ( ) SDSS : d 2 r i dt 2 = Gm jr ij j i rij 3 = Newton 3 0.1% 19 20 20 2 ( ) 3 3

500 6 LHC ALICE ( 25 ) µsec MeV QGP

5 6 LHC ALICE shigaki@hiroshima-u.ac.jp chujo.tatsuya.fw@u.tsukuba.ac.jp gunji@cns.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 3 ( 5 ) 5. µsec MeV QGP 98 RHIC QGP CERN LHC. LHC ALICE LHC p+p RHIC QGP ALICE 3 5 36 3, [, ] ALICE [,

ニュートリノ駆動型 超新星爆発シミュレーション ３Ｄと２Ｄの比較

2014/7/8 Joint Meeting among RESCEU-RIKEN-IPMU@RIKEN Explosion Mechanism of Core-collapse Supernovae Tomoya Takiwaki (NAOJ->RIKEN) Press Release in April There are two press release on supernovae in last

positron 1930 Dirac 1933 Anderson m 22Na(hl=2.6years), 58Co(hl=71days), 64Cu(hl=12hour) 68Ge(hl=288days) MeV : thermalization m psec 100

positron 1930 Dirac 1933 Anderson m 22Na(hl=2.6years), 58Co(hl=71days), 64Cu(hl=12hour) 68Ge(hl=288days) 0.5 1.5MeV : thermalization 10 100 m psec 100psec nsec E total = 2mc 2 + E e + + E e Ee+ Ee-c mc

1/2 ( ) 1 * 1 2/3 *2 up charm top -1/3 down strange bottom 6 (ν e, ν µ, ν τ ) -1 (e) (µ) (τ) 6 ( 2 ) 6 6 I II III u d ν e e c s ν µ µ t b ν τ τ (2a) (

August 26, 2005 1 1 1.1...................................... 1 1.2......................... 4 1.3....................... 5 1.4.............. 7 1.5.................... 8 1.6 GIM..........................

KamLAND (µ) ν e RSFP + ν e RSFP(Resonant Spin Flavor Precession) ν e RSFP 1. ν e ν µ ν e RSFP.ν e νµ ν e νe µ KamLAND νe KamLAND (ʼ4). kton-day 8.3 < E ν < 14.8 MeV candidates Φ(νe) < 37 cm - s -1 P(νe

d > 2 α B(y) y (5.1) s 2 = c z = x d 1+α dx ln u 1 ] 2u ψ(u) c z y 1 d 2 + α c z y t y y t- s 2 2 s 2 > d > 2 T c y T c y = T t c = T c /T 1 (3.

5 S 2 tot = S 2 T (y, t) + S 2 (y) = const. Z 2 (4.22) σ 2 /4 y = y z y t = T/T 1 2 (3.9) (3.15) s 2 = A(y, t) B(y) (5.1) A(y, t) = x d 1+α dx ln u 1 ] 2u ψ(u), u = x(y + x 2 )/t s 2 T A 3T d S 2 tot S

V(x) m e V 0 cos x π x π V(x) = x < π, x > π V 0 (i) x = 0 (V(x) V 0 (1 x 2 /2)) n n d 2 f dξ 2ξ d f 2 dξ + 2n f = 0 H n (ξ) (ii) H

199 1 1 199 1 1. Vx) m e V cos x π x π Vx) = x < π, x > π V i) x = Vx) V 1 x /)) n n d f dξ ξ d f dξ + n f = H n ξ) ii) H n ξ) = 1) n expξ ) dn dξ n exp ξ )) H n ξ)h m ξ) exp ξ )dξ = π n n!δ n,m x = Vx)

42 3 u = (37) MeV/c 2 (3.4) [1] u amu m p m n [1] m H [2] m p = (4) MeV/c 2 = (13) u m n = (4) MeV/c 2 =

3 3.1 3.1.1 kg m s J = kg m 2 s 2 MeV MeV [1] 1MeV=1 6 ev = 1.62 176 462 (63) 1 13 J (3.1) [1] 1MeV/c 2 =1.782 661 731 (7) 1 3 kg (3.2) c =1 MeV (atomic mass unit) 12 C u = 1 12 M(12 C) (3.3) 41 42 3 u

スライド 1

Matsuura Laboratory SiC SiC 13 2004 10 21 22 H-SiC ( C-SiC HOY Matsuura Laboratory n E C E D ( E F E T Matsuura Laboratory Matsuura Laboratory DLTS Osaka Electro-Communication University Unoped n 3C-SiC

1 2 1 a(=,incident particle A(target nucleus) b (projectile B( product nucleus, residual nucleus, ) ; a + A B + b a A B b 1: A(a,b)B A=B,a=b 2 1. ( 10

1 2 1 a(=,incident particle A(target nucleus) b (projectile B( product nucleus, residual nucleus, ) ; a + A B + b a A B b 1: A(a,b)B A=B,a=b 2 1. ( 10 14 m) ( 10 10 m) 2., 3 1 =reaction-text20181101b.tex

toki

杉本先生とその後の核物理の発展 土岐博大阪大学核物理センター 2013.4.7 tokisugimoto@osaka 1 3 人で座談会をした 杉本先生と村岡先生に捧げる 2013.4.7 tokisugimoto@osaka 2 1 放射線ビームと不安定核物理 1975-1982: ニューマトロン計画 杉本核研所長を中心とする日米の LBL-INS の共同実験計画 不安定原子核ビーム実験手法の創設とその手法による実験

TQFT_yokota

, TY, Naito, Phys. Rev. B 99, 115106 (2019),, 2019 9 2 1 (DFT) (DFT)? HΨ(x 1,, x N ) = EΨ(x 1,, x N ) N DFT! Hohenberg, Kohn, PR (1964) Kohn, Sham, PRA (1965) (EDF) E[ρ] = F[ρ] + dxv(x)ρ(x) δe[ρ] δρ(x)

g µν g µν G µν = 8πG c 4 T µν (1) G µν T µν G c µ ν 0 3 (1) T µν T µν (1) G µν g µν 2 (1) g µν 1 1 描

419 特集 宇宙における新しい流体力学 - ブラックホールと SASI- SASI Study of SASI in Black Hole Accretion Flows by Employing General Relativistic Compressive Hydrodynamics Hiroki NAGAKURA, Yukawa Institute for Theoretical Physics,

untitled

--- = ---- 16 Z 8 0 8 8 0 Big Bang 8 8 s-process 50 r-process 8 50 N r-process s-process Hydrogen 71% Helium 8% Others 1.9% Heay 4-4% lements(>ni p-process (γ process? r-process s-process Big Bang H,He

untitled

18 2 1 1.1 1.2 2 (SEU) 3 3.1 SEU 3.1.1 Barak 3.1.2 Barak 3.2 Weibull SEU 10 4 SEU 12 4.1 12 4.2 Calvel 15 4.2.1 Barak Barak 15 4.2.2 Barak Barak 19 4.3 USEF 25 4.3.1 USEF Weibull 25 4.3.2 Barak Barak 26

A

A04-164 2008 2 13 1 4 1.1.......................................... 4 1.2..................................... 4 1.3..................................... 4 1.4..................................... 5 2

* 1 1 (i) (ii) Brückner-Hartree-Fock (iii) (HF, BCS, HFB) (iv) (TDHF,TDHFB) (RPA) (QRPA) (v) (vi) *

* 1 1 (i) (ii) Brückner-Hartree-Fock (iii) (HF, BCS, HFB) (iv) (TDHF,TDHFB) (RPA) (QRPA) (v) (vi) *1 2004 1 1 ( ) ( ) 1.1 140 MeV 1.2 ( ) ( ) 1.3 2.6 10 8 s 7.6 10 17 s? Λ 2.5 10 10 s 6 10 24 s 1.4 ( m

放射線化学, 92, 39 (2011)

V. M. S. V. 1 Contents of the lecture note by Prof. V. M. Byakov and Dr. S. V. Stepanov (Institute of Theoretical and Experimental Physics, Russia) are described in a series of articles. The first article

: u i = (2) x i Smagorinsky τ ij τ [3] ij u i u j u i u j = 2ν SGS S ij, (3) ν SGS = (C s ) 2 S (4) x i a u i ρ p P T u ν τ ij S c ν SGS S csgs

15 C11-4 Numerical analysis of flame propagation in a combustor of an aircraft gas turbine, 4-6-1 E-mail: tominaga@icebeer.iis.u-tokyo.ac.jp, 2-11-16 E-mail: ntani@iis.u-tokyo.ac.jp, 4-6-1 E-mail: itoh@icebeer.iis.u-tokyo.ac.jp,

Mｏｔｔ散乱によるParity対称性の破れを検証

Mott Parity P2 Mott target Mott Parity Parity Γ = 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 t P P ),,, ( 3 2 1 0 1 γ γ γ γ γ γ ν ν µ µ = = Γ 1 : : : Γ P P P P x x P ν ν µ µ vector axial vector ν ν µ µ γ γ Γ ν γ

B

B07557 0 0 (AGN) AGN AGN X X AGN AGN Geant4 AGN X X X (AGN) AGN AGN X AGN. AGN AGN Seyfert Seyfert Seyfert AGN 94 Carl Seyfert Seyfert Seyfert z < 0. Seyfert I II I 000 km/s 00 km/s II AGN (BLR) (NLR)

1 a b cc b * 1 Helioseismology * * r/r r/r a 1.3 FTD 9 11 Ω B ϕ α B p FTD 2 b Ω * 1 r, θ, ϕ ϕ * 2 *

448 8542 1 e-mail: ymasada@auecc.aichi-edu.ac.jp 1. 400 400 1.1 10 1 1 5 1 11 2 3 4 656 2015 10 1 a b cc b 22 5 1.2 * 1 Helioseismology * 2 6 8 * 3 1 0.7 r/r 1.0 2 r/r 0.7 3 4 2a 1.3 FTD 9 11 Ω B ϕ α B

C el = 3 2 Nk B (2.14) c el = 3k B C el = 3 2 Nk B

I ino@hiroshima-u.ac.jp 217 11 14 4 4.1 2 2.4 C el = 3 2 Nk B (2.14) c el = 3k B 2 3 3.15 C el = 3 2 Nk B 3.15 39 2 1925 (Wolfgang Pauli) (Pauli exclusion principle) T E = p2 2m p T N 4 Pauli Sommerfeld

2 X-ray 6 gamma-ray 7 1 17.1 0:38m 0:77m nm 17.2 Hz Hz 1 E p E E = h = ch= (17.2) p = E=c = h=c = h= (17.3) continuum continuous spectrum line spectru

1 17 object 1 observation 17.1 X electromagnetic wave photon 1 = c (17.1) c =3 10 8 ms ;1 m mm = 10 ;3 m m =10 ;6 m nm = 10 ;9 m 1 Hz 17.1 spectrum radio 2 infrared 3 visual light optical light 4 ultraviolet

l ηµν hµν g µν = η µν + h µν, h µν 1 l Transvers-Traceless (TT) h TT 0µ = 0, η ij i h TT jk = 0, η ij h TT ij = 0, η µν µ ν h TT ij = 2 c 2 t + Δ 2 h TT = 0 ij 2 Polarization l From the TT condition, h

(Blackbody Radiation) (Stefan-Boltzmann s Law) (Wien s Displacement Law)

( ) ( ) 2002.11 1 1 1.1 (Blackbody Radiation).............................. 1 1.2 (Stefan-Boltzmann s Law)................ 1 1.3 (Wien s Displacement Law)....................... 2 1.4 (Kirchhoff s Law)...........................

0406_total.pdf

59 7 7.1 σ-ω σ-ω σ ω σ = σ(r), ω µ = δ µ,0 ω(r) (6-4) (iγ µ µ m U(r) γ 0 V (r))ψ(x) = 0 (7-1) U(r) = g σ σ(r), V (r) = g ω ω(r) σ(r) ω(r) (6-3) ( 2 + m 2 σ)σ(r) = g σ ψψ (7-2) ( 2 + m 2 ω)ω(r) = g ω ψγ

64 3 g=9.85 m/s 2 g=9.791 m/s 2 36, km ( ) 1 () 2 () m/s : : a) b) kg/m kg/m k

63 3 Section 3.1 g 3.1 3.1: : 64 3 g=9.85 m/s 2 g=9.791 m/s 2 36, km ( ) 1 () 2 () 3 9.8 m/s 2 3.2 3.2: : a) b) 5 15 4 1 1. 1 3 14. 1 3 kg/m 3 2 3.3 1 3 5.8 1 3 kg/m 3 3 2.65 1 3 kg/m 3 4 6 m 3.1. 65 5

T05_Nd-Fe-B磁石.indd

Influence of Intergranular Grain Boundary Phases on Coercivity in Nd-Fe-B-based Magnets Takeshi Nishiuchi Teruo Kohashi Isao Kitagawa Akira Sugawara Hiroyuki Yamamoto To determine how to increase the coercivity

V懇_2017.key

z > 4 Radio-loud 2 Z. -Q. Shen VLBI 2017 @ J1427+3312; z = 6.1 160 pc Frey et al. 2008 Figure 1. VLBI images at 1.6 GHz of three very high-redshift q left), J1427+3312 (z = 6.12, middle), and J1429+5447

main.dvi

SGC - 48 208X Y Z Z 2006 1930 β Z 2006! 1 2 3 Z 1930 SGC -12, 2001 5 6 http://www.saiensu.co.jp/support.htm http://www.shinshu-u.ac.jp/ haru/ xy.z :-P 3 4 2006 3 ii 1 1 1.1... 1 1.2 1930... 1 1.3 1930...

1 2 2 (Dielecrics) Maxwell ( ) D H

2003.02.13 1 2 2 (Dielecrics) 4 2.1... 4 2.2... 5 2.3... 6 2.4... 6 3 Maxwell ( ) 9 3.1... 9 3.2 D H... 11 3.3... 13 4 14 4.1... 14 4.2... 14 4.3... 17 4.4... 19 5 22 6 THz 24 6.1... 24 6.2... 25 7 26

September 9, 2002 ( ) [1] K. Hukushima and Y. Iba, cond-mat/ [2] H. Takayama and K. Hukushima, cond-mat/020

mailto:hukusima@issp.u-tokyo.ac.jp September 9, 2002 ( ) [1] and Y. Iba, cond-mat/0207123. [2] H. Takayama and, cond-mat/0205276. Typeset by FoilTEX Today s Contents Against Temperature Chaos in Spin Glasses

The Evaluation on Impact Strength of Structural Elements by Means of Drop Weight Test Elastic Response and Elastic Limit by Hiroshi Maenaka, Member Sh

The Evaluation on Impact Strength of Structural Elements by Means of Drop Weight Test Elastic Response and Elastic Limit by Hiroshi Maenaka, Member Shigeru Kitamura, Member Masaaki Sakuma Genya Aoki, Member

TOP URL 1

TOP URL http://amonphys.web.fc.com/ 1 19 3 19.1................... 3 19.............................. 4 19.3............................... 6 19.4.............................. 8 19.5.............................

イメージング分光によるMeVガンマ線天文学の展望

髙田淳史 ( 京大理 ) 元素合成 SNR : 放射性同位体銀河面 : 26 Al 電子陽電子対消滅線粒子加速ジェット (AGN) : シンクロトロン + 逆コンプトン強い重力場 Black hole : 降着円盤, π 0 Etc. ガンマ線パルサー, 太陽フレア 1-30 MeV MeV sky map CGRO/COMPTEL Bad Sensitivity Good erg / (cm 2

Microsoft PowerPoint - hoshino_part1.pptx

天体プラズマにおける粒子加速機構 無衝突系粒子シミュレーション 星野真弘理学系研究科 地惑惑星科学専攻 内容 ** PIC (Particle In Cell) シミュレーション ** プラズマ輸送係数の研究 (MHD では現象論的に扱う粘性 電気抵抗 熱伝導に関わる物理 ) 非熱的プラズマ ( 局所的熱平衡ではない物理 ) 電子とイオンのエネルギー分配 宇宙での高エネルギー粒子の観測 数値チェレンコフ問題

( ) Note Ω m = 1 Ω m : ( ) r-process α 1: 2 32T h(t 1/2 = y) 2 38U(t 1/2 = y) 2 35U(t 1/2 = 7.038

( ) Note 4 19 11 22 6 6.1 1 Ω m = 1 Ω m.3 6.1.1 : ( ) r-process α 1: 2 32T h(t 1/2 = 1.45 1 1 y) 2 38U(t 1/2 = 4.468 1 9 y) 2 35U(t 1/2 = 7.38 1 8 y) 2 44Pu(t 1/2 = 8.26 1 7 y) β / (J.A.Johnson and M.Bolte:

(e ) (µ ) (τ ) ( (ν e,e ) e- (ν µ,µ ) µ- (ν τ,τ ) τ- ) ( ) ( ) ( ) (SU(2) ) (W +,Z 0,W ) * 1) [ ] [ ] [ ] ν e ν µ ν τ e µ τ, e R,µ R,τ R (2.1a

1 2 2.1 (e ) (µ ) (τ ) ( (ν e,e ) e- (ν µ,µ ) µ- (ν τ,τ ) τ- ) ( ) ( ) ( ) (SU(2) ) (W +,Z 0,W ) * 1) [ ] [ ] [ ] ν e ν µ ν τ e µ τ, e R,µ R,τ R (2.1a) L ( ) ) * 2) W Z 1/2 ( - ) d u + e + ν e 1 1 0 0

2.1: n = N/V ( ) k F = ( 3π 2 N ) 1/3 = ( 3π 2 n ) 1/3 V (2.5) [ ] a = h2 2m k2 F h2 2ma (1 27 ) (1 8 ) erg, (2.6) /k B 1 11 / K

2 2.1? [ ] L 1 ε(p) = 1 ( p 2 2m x + p 2 y + pz) 2 = h2 ( k 2 2m x + ky 2 + kz) 2 n x, n y, n z (2.1) (2.2) p = hk = h 2π L (n x, n y, n z ) (2.3) n k p 1 i (ε i ε i+1 )1 1 g = 2S + 1 2 1/2 g = 2 ( p F

4 2 Rutherford 89 Rydberg λ = R ( n 2 ) n 2 n = n +,n +2, n = Lyman n =2 Balmer n =3 Paschen R Rydberg R = cm 896 Zeeman Zeeman Zeeman Lorentz

2 Rutherford 2. Rutherford N. Bohr Rutherford 859 Kirchhoff Bunsen 86 Maxwell Maxwell 885 Balmer λ Balmer λ = 364.56 n 2 n 2 4 Lyman, Paschen 3 nm, n =3, 4, 5, 4 2 Rutherford 89 Rydberg λ = R ( n 2 ) n

MUFFIN3

MUFFIN - MUltiFarious FIeld simulator for Non-equilibrium system - ( ) MUFFIN WG3 - - JCII, - ( ) - ( ) - ( ) - (JSR) - - MUFFIN sec -3 msec -6 sec GOURMET SUSHI MUFFIN -9 nsec PASTA -1 psec -15 fsec COGNAC

chap1_MDpotentials.ppt

simplest Morse : simplest (1 Well-chosen functional form is more useful than elaborate fitting strategies!! Phys. Rev. 34, 57 (1929 ( 2 E ij = D e 1" exp("#(r ij " r e 2 r ij = r i " r j r ij =r e E ij

¼§À�ÍýÏÀ – Ê×ÎòÅŻҼ§À�¤È¥¹¥Ô¥ó¤æ¤é¤®

email: takahash@sci.u-hyogo.ac.jp Spring semester, 2012 Outline 1. 2 / 26 Introduction : (d ) : 4f 1970 ZrZn 2, MnSi, Ni 3 Al, Sc 3 In Stoner-Wohlfarth Moriya-Kawabata (1973) 3 / 26 Properties of Weak

スーパーカミオカンデにおける 高エネルギーニュートリノ研究

2009 11 20 Cosmic Ray PD D M P4 ? CR M f M PD MOA M1 ν ν p+p+p+p 4 He +2e - +2ν e MeV e - + p n+ ν e γ e + + e - ν x + ν x p + p, γ + p π + X π µ + ν µ e + ν µ + ν e TeV p + p π + X π µ + ν µ e + ν µ +

講義ノート 物性研究 電子版 Vol.3 No.1, (2013 年 T c µ T c Kammerlingh Onnes 77K ρ 5.8µΩcm 4.2K ρ 10 4 µωcm σ 77K ρ 4.2K σ σ = ne 2 τ/m τ 77K

2 2 T c µ T c 1 1.1 1911 Kammerlingh Onnes 77K ρ 5.8µΩcm 4.2K ρ 1 4 µωcm σ 77K ρ 4.2K σ σ = ne 2 τ/m τ 77K τ 4.2K σ 58 213 email:takada@issp.u-tokyo.ac.jp 1933 Meissner Ochsenfeld λ = 1 5 cm B = χ B =

Gravothermal Catastrophe & Quasi-equilibrium Structure in N-body Systems

2004/3/1 3 N 1 Antonov Problem & Quasi-equilibrium State in N-body N Systems A. Taruya (RESCEU, Univ.Tokyo) M. Sakagami (Kyoto Univ.) 2 Antonov problem N-body study of quasi-attractivity M15 T Antonov

19 σ = P/A o σ B Maximum tensile strength σ % 0.2% proof stress σ EL Elastic limit Work hardening coefficient failure necking σ PL Proportional

19 σ = P/A o σ B Maximum tensile strength σ 0. 0.% 0.% proof stress σ EL Elastic limit Work hardening coefficient failure necking σ PL Proportional limit ε p = 0.% ε e = σ 0. /E plastic strain ε = ε e

2 (March 13, 2010) N Λ a = i,j=1 x i ( d (a) i,j x j ), Λ h = N i,j=1 x i ( d (h) i,j x j ) B a B h B a = N i,j=1 ν i d (a) i,j, B h = x j N i,j=1 ν i

1. A. M. Turing [18] 60 Turing A. Gierer H. Meinhardt [1] : (GM) ) a t = D a a xx µa + ρ (c a2 h + ρ 0 (0 < x < l, t > 0) h t = D h h xx νh + c ρ a 2 (0 < x < l, t > 0) a x = h x = 0 (x = 0, l) a = a(x,

tsunoda _1

モンテカルロ殻模型による ベータ崩壊の研究 東京大学原子核科学研究センター (CNS) 角田佑介 モンテカルロ殻模型による研究対象の核種 Hg r プロセス Sn Sm Zr モンテカルロ殻模型 (MCSM) により 従来の殻模型計算の手法では困難な核種も計算可能に 理研仁科センターアーカイブより引用 原子核の形状 : spherical oblate prolate 一部の核種では異なる形状を持つ固有状態が近いエネルギーに現れる

ohpmain.dvi

fujisawa@ism.ac.jp 1 Contents 1. 2. 3. 4. γ- 2 1. 3 10 5.6, 5.7, 5.4, 5.5, 5.8, 5.5, 5.3, 5.6, 5.4, 5.2. 5.5 5.6 +5.7 +5.4 +5.5 +5.8 +5.5 +5.3 +5.6 +5.4 +5.2 =5.5. 10 outlier 5 5.6, 5.7, 5.4, 5.5, 5.8,

Estimation of Photovoltaic Module Temperature Rise Motonobu Yukawa, Member, Masahisa Asaoka, Non-member (Mitsubishi Electric Corp.) Keigi Takahara, Me

Estimation of Photovoltaic Module Temperature Rise Motonobu Yukawa, Member, Masahisa Asaoka, Non-member (Mitsubishi Electric Corp.) Keigi Takahara, Member (Okinawa Electric Power Co.,Inc.) Toshimitsu Ohshiro,

Mathews Grant J. (University of Notre Dame) Boyd Richard N. (Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory) 2009/5/21

Mathews Grant J. (University of Notre Dame) Boyd Richard N. (Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory) 2009/5/21 Abstract strongly interacting massive particles (SIMPs, X) Big Bang (BBN) X heavy colored

news

ETL NEWS 1999.9 ETL NEWS 1999.11 Establishment of an Evaluation Technique for Laser Pulse Timing Fluctuations Optoelectronics Division Hidemi Tsuchida e-mail:tsuchida@etl.go.jp A new technique has been

rcnp01may-2

E22 RCP Ring-Cyclotron 97 953 K beam K-atom HF X K, +,K + e,e K + -spectroscopy OK U U I= First-order -exchange - coupling I= U LS U LS Meson-exchange model /5/ I= Symmetric LS Anti-symmetric LS ( σ Λ

E 1 GeV E 10 GeV 1 2, X X , GeV 10 GeV 1 GeV GeV π

169 8555 3 4 1 e-mail: kataoka.jun@waseda.jp 606 8502 e-mail: totani@kuastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp 305 0801 1 1 e-mail: kunihito.ioka@kek.jp 50 5 X 1 10 10 2008 3 2,000 542 2012 9 5 2. 1 3 E 1 GeV E 10 GeV 1 2,

Kaluza-Klein(KK) SO(11) KK 1 2 1

Maskawa Institute, Kyoto Sangyo University Naoki Yamatsu 2016 4 12 ( ) @ Kaluza-Klein(KK) SO(11) KK 1 2 1 1. 2. 3. 4. 2 1. 標準理論 物質場 ( フェルミオン ) スカラー ゲージ場 クォーク ヒッグス u d s b ν c レプトン ν t ν e μ τ e μ τ e h

Nosé Hoover 1.2 ( 1) (a) (b) 1:

1 watanabe@cc.u-tokyo.ac.jp 1 1.1 Nosé Hoover 1. ( 1) (a) (b) 1: T ( f(p x, p y, p z ) exp p x + p y + p ) z (1) mk B T p x p y p = = z = 1 m m m k BT () k B T = 1.3 0.04 0.03 0.0 0.01 0-5 -4-3 - -1 0

36 th IChO : - 3 ( ) , G O O D L U C K final 1

36 th ICh - - 5 - - : - 3 ( ) - 169 - -, - - - - - - - G D L U C K final 1 1 1.01 2 e 4.00 3 Li 6.94 4 Be 9.01 5 B 10.81 6 C 12.01 7 N 14.01 8 16.00 9 F 19.00 10 Ne 20.18 11 Na 22.99 12 Mg 24.31 Periodic

FPWS2018講義千代

千代勝実(山形大学) 素粒子物理学入門@FPWS2018 3つの究極の 宗教や神話 哲学や科学が行き着く人間にとって究極の問い 宇宙 世界 はどのように始まり どのように終わるのか 全てをつかさどる究極原理は何か 今日はこれを考えます 人類はどういう存在なのか Wikipediaより 4 /72 千代勝実(山形大学) 素粒子物理学入門@FPWS2018 電子レンジ 可視光では中が透け

数値相対論シミュレーション

数値相対論シミュレーション 関口雄一郎 ( 京都大学基礎物理学研究所 ) 内容 数値相対論の概要 最近の研究成果 - アニメーションを中心にー 数値相対論とは? John von Neumann 非線形問題の解法として 高速電子計算機を用いる時代が必ず到来する 数値相対論のターゲット 強重力場の動的変動を伴う現象 ブラックホール形成の瞬間 大質量星の重力崩壊 コンパクト天体連星の合体, etc 重力波放出現象

スケーリング理論とはなにか? - --尺度を変えて見えること--

? URL: http://maildbs.c.u-tokyo.ac.jp/ fukushima mailto:hukusima@phys.c.u-tokyo.ac.jp DEX-SMI @ 2006 12 17 ( ) What is scaling theory? DEX-SMI 1 / 40 Outline Outline 1 2 3 4 ( ) What is scaling theory?

φ 4 Minimal subtraction scheme 2-loop ε 2008 (University of Tokyo) (Atsuo Kuniba) version 21/Apr/ Formulas Γ( n + ɛ) = ( 1)n (1 n! ɛ + ψ(n + 1)

φ 4 Minimal subtraction scheme 2-loop ε 28 University of Tokyo Atsuo Kuniba version 2/Apr/28 Formulas Γ n + ɛ = n n! ɛ + ψn + + Oɛ n =,, 2, ψn + = + 2 + + γ, 2 n ψ = γ =.5772... Euler const, log + ax x

研究室ガイダンス(H29)福山研v2.pdf

J.M. Kosterlitz and D.J. Thouless, Phys. 5, L124 (1972); ibid. 6, 1181 (1973) David J. Thouless J. Michael Kosterlitz + ρ T s KT D.J. Bishop and J.D. Reppy, PRL 40, 1727 (1978) ( ) = 2k B m2 T KT π 2 T

EGunGPU

Super Computing in Accelerator simulations - Electron Gun simulation using GPGPU - K. Ohmi, KEK-Accel Accelerator Physics seminar 2009.11.19 Super computers in KEK HITACHI SR11000 POWER5 16 24GB 16 134GFlops,

C01_oiwa.key

@ for the RCNP E398 Collaboration: M. Sakuda,Y. Yamada, T. Shirahige, D. Fukuda, Y. Koshio, T. Yano, T. Mori (Okayama ) A. Tamii, N. Aoi, M. Yosoi, E. Ideguchi,T. Suzuki,, C. Iwamoto,T. Ito, M. Miura,

68 A mm 1/10 A. (a) (b) A.: (a) A.3 A.4 1 1

67 A Section A.1 0 1 0 1 Balmer 7 9 1 0.1 0.01 1 9 3 10:09 6 A.1: A.1 1 10 9 68 A 10 9 10 9 1 10 9 10 1 mm 1/10 A. (a) (b) A.: (a) A.3 A.4 1 1 A.1. 69 5 1 10 15 3 40 0 0 ¾ ¾ É f Á ½ j 30 A.3: A.4: 1/10

1 9 v.0.1 c (2016/10/07) Minoru Suzuki T µ 1 (7.108) f(e ) = 1 e β(e µ) 1 E 1 f(e ) (Bose-Einstein distribution function) *1 (8.1) (9.1)

1 9 v..1 c (216/1/7) Minoru Suzuki 1 1 9.1 9.1.1 T µ 1 (7.18) f(e ) = 1 e β(e µ) 1 E 1 f(e ) (Bose-Einstein distribution function) *1 (8.1) (9.1) E E µ = E f(e ) E µ (9.1) µ (9.2) µ 1 e β(e µ) 1 f(e )

1 1.1,,,.. (, ),..,. (Fig. 1.1). Macro theory (e.g. Continuum mechanics) Consideration under the simple concept (e.g. ionic radius, bond valence) Stru

1. 1-1. 1-. 1-3.. MD -1. -. -3. MD 1 1 1.1,,,.. (, ),..,. (Fig. 1.1). Macro theory (e.g. Continuum mechanics) Consideration under the simple concept (e.g. ionic radius, bond valence) Structural relaxation

[ ] = L [δ (D ) (x )] = L D [g ] = L D [E ] = L Table : ħh = m = D D, V (x ) = g δ (D ) (x ) E g D E (Table )D = Schrödinger (.3)D = (regularization)

. D............................................... : E = κ ............................................ 3.................................................

From Evans Application Notes

3 From Evans Application Notes http://www.eaglabs.com From Evans Application Notes http://www.eaglabs.com XPS AES ISS SSIMS ATR-IR 1-10keV µ 1 V() r = kx 2 = 2π µν x mm 1 2 µ= m + m 1 2 1 k ν = OSC 2

Canvas-tr01(title).cv3

Working Group DaiMaJin DaiRittaikaku Multiparticle Jiki-Bunnsekiki Samurai7 Superconducting Analyser for Multi particles from RadioIsotope Beams with 7Tm of bending power (γ,n) softgdr, GDR non resonant