2 2 2 (Poisson Distribution) P (y = j) = e λ λ j λ > 0, j = 0, 1, 2... j! j! j E(y) = V ar(y) = λ λ y x λ = λ(x iβ) f(y i x iβ) = exp( exp(x i β)) exp

Size: px
Start display at page:

Download "2 2 2 (Poisson Distribution) P (y = j) = e λ λ j λ > 0, j = 0, 1, 2... j! j! j E(y) = V ar(y) = λ λ y x λ = λ(x iβ) f(y i x iβ) = exp( exp(x i β)) exp"

Transcription

1 Cameron and Trivedi (1998,2005) Winkelmann(1997) 1 Bortkiewicz(1898) 1

2 2 2 2 (Poisson Distribution) P (y = j) = e λ λ j λ > 0, j = 0, 1, 2... j! j! j E(y) = V ar(y) = λ λ y x λ = λ(x iβ) f(y i x iβ) = exp( exp(x i β)) exp(y ix i β), y i = 0, 1, 2,... y i! E(y i x i ) = exp(x i β) V ar(y i x i ) = exp(x i β) log L(β; y, x) = n {y i x iβ exp(x iβ) ln y i!} i=1 1 n (y i exp(x iβ))x i = 0 i=1 β β marginal mean effect E(y i x i ) x il = exp(x iβ)β l = E(y i x i )β l 2 Cameron and Trivedi (1998, 2005; Chapter 20.) Winkelmann and Bose (2006, pp )

3 3 x x 3 E(y i x i )/E(y i x i ) x il = β l x il y i x il β l x l x m 2 E(y i x i ) x il x im = exp(x iβ)β l β m = E(y i x i )β l β m 0 marginal probability effect P (y i = j x i ) x il = P (y i = j x i )[j exp(x iβ)]β l j exp(x i β) 4 overdispersion unobserved heterogeneity y f(y i x i ) = λy i i y i! 0 e λiui u y i i γ θ Γ(θ) uθ 1 i e γui du i λ i = exp(x i β) E(u i x i ) = 1 γ = θ 3 median: 50% mode 4 single crossing property

4 4 f(y i x i ) = λy i i y i! 0 = λy i i θ θ y i! Γ(θ) λ yi i e λiui u y i i 0 θ θ θ θ Γ(θ) uθ 1 i e θui du i e (λ i+θ)u i u y i+θ 1 i du i Γ(y i + θ) = Γ(y i + 1) Γ(θ) (λ i + θ) y i+θ = Γ(y ( i + θ) λi Γ(y i + 1)Γ(θ) λ i + θ ) yi ( θ λ i + θ Negative Binominal Distribution 5 E(y i x i ) = λ i V ar(y i x i ) = λ i (1 + θ 1 λ i ) NB V ar = (1 + δ)λ i δ = θ 1 i λ i i θ i NB1 ) θ V ar(y i x i ) = (1 + σ 2 ) exp(x iβ) ln L(θ, β) = n yi 1 ( ln(j + θ exp(x iβ))) ln y i! (y i + θ exp(x iβ)) ln(1 + θ 1 ) y i ln θ i=1 j=0 1 n i=1 θ 2 n y i 1 θλ i x i + θλ i x i j + θλ i = 0 i=1 j=0 y i 1 λ i θ 2 λ i ln(1 + θ 1 ) θ 1 (j + θ) 1 + θ 1 + y iθ 1 = 0 j=0 δ = 0 θ θ 1 = σ 2 NB2 V ar(y i x i ) = exp(x iβ) + σ 2 [exp(x iβ)] 2 5 Greenwood and Yule (1920)

5 5 ln L(θ, β) = n yi 1 ( ln(j + θ)) ln y i! (y i + θ) ln(1 + exp(x iβ)) y i ln θ + y i x iβ i=1 j=0 n θ2 i=1 n i=1 ln(1 + λ i /θ) y i λ i 1 + λ i /θ x i = 0 y i 1 j=0 1 y i λ i + (j + θ) (1 + λ i /θ)/θ = 0 σ 2 0 NB1 NB2 NB OLS α (y i λ i ) 2 y i = α g( λ i ) + u i λ i λ i g( λ) = λ 2 g( λ) = λ λ i = exp(x i β) α = 0 V ar(y i x i ) = λ i overdispersion NB1 NB2 3 δ = 0 α = 0 NB1 NB2 3 RAND 6 6 Manning, Newhouse, Duan, Keeler and Leibowitz (1987) Newhouse and the Insurance Experiment Group (1993) Deb and Trivedi (2002)

6 % 25% 50% 95% 100% individual deductible plan % 10% 15% 10 40% 2 MDU LC ln(1+ ) % IDP 100% individual deductible plan 1 0 ( ) LPI ln(max(1, )) NB1NB 97 FMDE IDP=1 ln(max(1,mde/(0.01 MDE PHYSLIM NDISEASE HLTHG HLTHF HLTHP LINC ln( )( ) LFAM ln( )( Dayton ( ) Seattle Fitchburge Franklin County Charleston Georgetown County % 50% % 10

7 ) EDUCDEC AGE FEMALE CHILD FEMCHILD FEMALE*CHILD BLACK MDU % 10 5% 2 NB1 NB2 3 LC IDP NB1 NB2 2 α = 0 δ = 0 NB1 NB2 NB % NB1 NB2

8 8 NB1 4-5 NB2 3 NB % 70 10% 20% Hurdle and Zero-Inflated Cameron and Trivedi (1998)

9 9 5 STATA P. Deb and P.K. Trivedi (2002) The Structure of Demand for Medical Care: Latent Class versus Two-Part Models, Journal of Health Economics, 21, randdata.dta Cameron and Trivedi (2005, Chapter 20) set more off use randdata.dta, clear /* educdec is missing for some observations*/ drop if educdec==. /* rename variables*/ rename mdvis MDU rename meddol MED rename binexp DMED rename lnmeddol LNMED rename linc LINC rename lfam LFAM rename educdec EDUCDEC rename xage AGE rename female FEMALE rename child CHILD rename fchild FEMCHILD rename black BLACK rename disea NDISEASE rename physlm PHYSLIM rename hlthg HLTHG rename hlthf HLTHF rename hlthp HLTHP rename idp IDP rename logc LC rename lpi LPI rename fmde FMDE /* Define the regressor list which in commands can refer to as $XLIST*/ global XLIST LC IDP LPI FMDE PHYSLIM NDISEASE HLTHG HLTHF HLTHP LINC LFAM EDUCDEC AGE FEMALE CHILD FEMCHILD BLACK sum MDU $XLIST

10 10 /* */ tabulate MDU /* */ hist MDU /* */ /* */ poisson MDU $XLIST estimates store poisml poisson MDU $XLIST, robust estimates store poisrobust predict MDUhat poisson MDU $XLIST, cluster(zper) estimates store poiscluster /*NB */ nbreg MDU $XLIST, dispersion(mean) /*NB2*/ nbreg MDU $XLIST, dispersion(mean) robust /*NB2 with robust z*/ estimates store nb2 predict MDUhat2 nbreg MDU $XLIST, cluster(zper) estimates store nbcluster nbreg MDU $XLIST, dispersion(constant) /*NB1*/ nbreg MDU $XLIST, dispersion(constant) robust /*NB1 with robust z*/ estimates store nb1 predict MDUhat1 hist MDUhat /* */ graph save MDUhat.gph, replace hist MDUhat1/* */ graph save MDUhat1.gph, replace hist MDUhat2/* */ graph save MDUhat2.gph, replace

11 11 [1] 2005) [2] 2007 No.57.( ) pp [3] Amemiya, T.(1985) Advanced Econometrics, Harvard University Press. [4] Bortkiewicz,L. von.(1898) Das Gesetz de Kleinen Zahlen, Leipzig, Teubner. [5] Cameron, A.C. and Trivedi, P.K.(1998) Regression Analysis of Count Data, Cambridge University Press. [6] Cameron, A.C. and Trivedi, P.K.(2005) Microeconometrics: Methods and Applications, Cambridge University Press. [7] Deb, Partha and Trivedi, Pravin K.(2002) The Structure of Demand for Health Care: Latent Class versus Two-Part Models, Journal of Health Economics, 21, pp [8] Gourieroux, Christian and Jasiak, Joann.(2007) The Econometrics of Individual Risk, Princeton University Press. [9] Greenwood, M. and Yule, G.U.(1920) An Inquiry into the Nature of Frequency Distributions of Multiple Happenings with Particular Reference to the Occurrence of Multiple Attacks of Disease or Repeated Accidents, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society A., 83, pp [10] Maddala, G.S.(1983) Limited-Dependent and Qualitative Variables in Economics, Cambridge University Press. [11] Manning, Willard G., Newhouse, Joseph P., Duan, Naihua., Keeler, Emmett B., and Leibowitz, Arleen. (1987) Health Insurance and the Demand for Medical Care: Evidence from a Randomized Experiment, American Economic Review, 77(3), pp [12] Newhouse, Joseph P., and the Insurance Experiment Group (1993) Free for All? Lessons from the RAND Health Insurance Experiment, Harvard University Press. [13] Winkelmann, R.(1997) Count Data Models: Econometric Theory and Application to Labor Mobility, Springer-Verlag. [14] Winkelmann, Rainer and Boes, Stefan.(2006) Analysis of Microdata, Springer.

12 12 [15] Wooldridge, Jeffrey. M.(2003a) Introductory Econometrics, Thomson. [16] Wooldridge, Jeffrey. M.(2003b) Econometric Analysis of Cross Section and Panel Data, The MIT Press

13 表 1 医院への通院回数の頻度分布 通院回数頻度パーセント累積値 0 6, , , , , 合計 20,

14 表 2 カウントデータ分析医院への通院確率 (1) Dependent Variable: MDU Coefficient Robust z-ratio Coefficient Robust z-ratio Coefficient Robust z-ratio LC IDP LPI FMDE PHYSLIM NDISEASE HLTHG HLTHF HLTHP LINC LFAM EDUCDEC AGE FEMALE CHILD FEMCHILD BLACK _cons Number of observations LR chi2(17) Pseudo R2 Log Likelihood alpha delta LR test of alpha=0: LR test of delta=0: Poisson NB chi2(01)=3.5e+04 Prob>chi2=0.000 NB chi2(01)=3.5e+04 Prob>chi2=0.000

15 図 1 医院への実際の通院回数のヒストグラム Density number face-to-fact md visits

16 図 2 ポアソン推定に基づく予測通院回数のヒストグラム Density predicted number of events

17 図 3 NB1 推定に基づく予測通院回数のヒストグラム Density predicted number of events

18 図 4 NB2 推定に基づく予測通院回数のヒストグラム Density predicted number of events

2 1,2, , 2 ( ) (1) (2) (3) (4) Cameron and Trivedi(1998) , (1987) (1982) Agresti(2003)

2 1,2, , 2 ( ) (1) (2) (3) (4) Cameron and Trivedi(1998) , (1987) (1982) Agresti(2003) 3 1 1 1 2 1 2 1,2,3 1 0 50 3000, 2 ( ) 1 3 1 0 4 3 (1) (2) (3) (4) 1 1 1 2 3 Cameron and Trivedi(1998) 4 1974, (1987) (1982) Agresti(2003) 3 (1)-(4) AAA, AA+,A (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (1)-(5) 1 2 5 3 5 (DI)

More information

9 1 (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (1)-(5) (i) (i + 1) 4 (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (1)-(2) (1)-(5) (5) 1

9 1 (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (1)-(5) (i) (i + 1) 4 (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (1)-(2) (1)-(5) (5) 1 9 1 (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (1)-(5) (i) (i + 1) 4 (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (1)-(2) (1)-(5) (5) 1 2 2 y i = 1, 2, 3,...J (1 < 2 < 3

More information

ed srv.cc.hit-u.ac.jp

ed srv.cc.hit-u.ac.jp 5 [ ] Two-Part Model contract decision frequency decision 1st Part 0.034 2nd Part 0.902 Full Price Model Full Price Elasticity Two-Part Model 1 15 1 2003 31.5 8.55 50.4 65 2 E-Mail: ed042007 srv.cc.hit-u.ac.jp

More information

!!! 2!

!!! 2! 2016/5/17 (Tue) SPSS ([email protected])! !!! 2! 3! 4! !!! 5! (Population)! (Sample) 6! case, observation, individual! variable!!! 1 1 4 2 5 2 1 5 3 4 3 2 3 3 1 4 2 1 4 8 7! (1) (2) (3) (4) categorical

More information

第13回:交差項を含む回帰・弾力性の推定

第13回:交差項を含む回帰・弾力性の推定 13 2018 7 27 1 / 31 1. 2. 2 / 31 y i = β 0 + β X x i + β Z z i + β XZ x i z i + u i, E(u i x i, z i ) = 0, E(u i u j x i, z i ) = 0 (i j), V(u i x i, z i ) = σ 2, i = 1, 2,, n x i z i 1 3 / 31 y i = β

More information

082_rev2_utf8.pdf

082_rev2_utf8.pdf 3 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 1 3 3 3 2008 3 2008 2008 3 2008 2008, 1 5 Lo and MacKinlay (1990a) de Jong and Nijman (1997) Cohen et al. (1983) Lo and MacKinlay (1990a b) Cohen et al. (1983) de Jong and Nijman (1997)

More information

2 2 natural experiments y y 1 y 0 y 1 y 0 y 1 y 0 counterfactual y 1 y 0 d treatment indicator d = 1 (treatment group) d = 0 control group average tre

2 2 natural experiments y y 1 y 0 y 1 y 0 y 1 y 0 counterfactual y 1 y 0 d treatment indicator d = 1 (treatment group) d = 0 control group average tre 12 1 Heckman and Smith (1998) Lee(2005) Cameron and Tridevi (2005, Chapter 25) Wooldridge (2003, Chapter 18) 1 2 2 natural experiments y y 1 y 0 y 1 y 0 y 1 y 0 counterfactual y 1 y 0 d treatment indicator

More information

.. est table TwoSLS1 TwoSLS2 GMM het,b(%9.5f) se Variable TwoSLS1 TwoSLS2 GMM_het hi_empunion totchr

.. est table TwoSLS1 TwoSLS2 GMM het,b(%9.5f) se Variable TwoSLS1 TwoSLS2 GMM_het hi_empunion totchr 3,. Cameron and Trivedi (2010) Microeconometrics Using Stata, Revised Edition, Stata Press 6 Linear instrumentalvariables regression 9 Linear panel-data models: Extensions.. GMM xtabond., GMM(Generalized

More information

Law and Economics Review vol.4,no.1(february 2009) 1998

Law and Economics Review vol.4,no.1(february 2009) 1998 Law and Economics Review vol.4,no.1(february 2009) 1998 1 500 No.93 1999114 2 195072119885021 19901991 3 Foreign Investment and National Security Act of 200720071024effective 1986 CFIUS2008831CFIUS web

More information

遺産相続、学歴及び退職金の決定要因に関する実証分析 『家族関係、就労、退職金及び教育・資産の世代間移転に関する世帯アンケート調査』

遺産相続、学歴及び退職金の決定要因に関する実証分析 『家族関係、就労、退職金及び教育・資産の世代間移転に関する世帯アンケート調査』 2-1. (2-1 ) (2-2 ) (2-3 ) (Hayashi [1986]Dekle [1989]Barthold and Ito [1992] [1996]Campbell [1997] [1998]Shimono and Ishikawa [2002]Shimono and Otsuki [2006] [2008]Horioka [2009]) 1 2-1-1 2-1-1-1 8 (1.

More information

第11回:線形回帰モデルのOLS推定

第11回:線形回帰モデルのOLS推定 11 OLS 2018 7 13 1 / 45 1. 2. 3. 2 / 45 n 2 ((y 1, x 1 ), (y 2, x 2 ),, (y n, x n )) linear regression model y i = β 0 + β 1 x i + u i, E(u i x i ) = 0, E(u i u j x i ) = 0 (i j), V(u i x i ) = σ 2, i

More information

BB 報告書完成版_修正版)040415.doc

BB 報告書完成版_修正版)040415.doc 3 4 5 8 KW Q = AK α W β q = a + α k + βw q = log Q, k = log K, w = logw i P ij v ij P ij = exp( vij ), J exp( v ) k= 1 ik v i j = X β αp + γnu j j j j X j j p j j NU j j NU j (

More information

4.9 Hausman Test Time Fixed Effects Model vs Time Random Effects Model Two-way Fixed Effects Model

4.9 Hausman Test Time Fixed Effects Model vs Time Random Effects Model Two-way Fixed Effects Model 1 EViews 5 2007 7 11 2010 5 17 1 ( ) 3 1.1........................................... 4 1.2................................... 9 2 11 3 14 3.1 Pooled OLS.............................................. 14

More information

Stata11 whitepapers mwp-037 regress - regress regress. regress mpg weight foreign Source SS df MS Number of obs = 74 F(

Stata11 whitepapers mwp-037 regress - regress regress. regress mpg weight foreign Source SS df MS Number of obs = 74 F( mwp-037 regress - regress 1. 1.1 1.2 1.3 2. 3. 4. 5. 1. regress. regress mpg weight foreign Source SS df MS Number of obs = 74 F( 2, 71) = 69.75 Model 1619.2877 2 809.643849 Prob > F = 0.0000 Residual

More information

こんにちは由美子です

こんにちは由美子です 1 2 . sum Variable Obs Mean Std. Dev. Min Max ---------+----------------------------------------------------- var1 13.4923077.3545926.05 1.1 3 3 3 0.71 3 x 3 C 3 = 0.3579 2 1 0.71 2 x 0.29 x 3 C 2 = 0.4386

More information

浜松医科大学紀要

浜松医科大学紀要 On the Statistical Bias Found in the Horse Racing Data (1) Akio NODA Mathematics Abstract: The purpose of the present paper is to report what type of statistical bias the author has found in the horse

More information

Stata 11 Stata ROC whitepaper mwp anova/oneway 3 mwp-042 kwallis Kruskal Wallis 28 mwp-045 ranksum/median / 31 mwp-047 roctab/roccomp ROC 34 mwp-050 s

Stata 11 Stata ROC whitepaper mwp anova/oneway 3 mwp-042 kwallis Kruskal Wallis 28 mwp-045 ranksum/median / 31 mwp-047 roctab/roccomp ROC 34 mwp-050 s BR003 Stata 11 Stata ROC whitepaper mwp anova/oneway 3 mwp-042 kwallis Kruskal Wallis 28 mwp-045 ranksum/median / 31 mwp-047 roctab/roccomp ROC 34 mwp-050 sampsi 47 mwp-044 sdtest 54 mwp-043 signrank/signtest

More information

2 [email protected] http://www.econ.tohoku.ac.jp/~fukui/site.htm 200 7 Cookbook-style . (Inference) (Population) (Sample) f(x = θ = θ ) (up to parameter values) (estimation) 2 3 (multicolinearity)

More information

最小2乗法

最小2乗法 2 2012 4 ( ) 2 2012 4 1 / 42 X Y Y = f (X ; Z) linear regression model X Y slope X 1 Y (X, Y ) 1 (X, Y ) ( ) 2 2012 4 2 / 42 1 β = β = β (4.2) = β 0 + β (4.3) ( ) 2 2012 4 3 / 42 = β 0 + β + (4.4) ( )

More information

( 30 ) 30 4 5 1 4 1.1............................................... 4 1.............................................. 4 1..1.................................. 4 1.......................................

More information

橡同居選択における所得の影響(DP原稿).PDF

橡同居選択における所得の影響(DP原稿).PDF ** *** * 2000 13 ** *** (1) (2) (1986) - 1 - - 2 - (1986) Ohtake (1991) (1993) (1994) (1996) (1997) (1997) Hayashi (1997) (1999) 60 Ohtake (1991) 86 (1996) 89 (1997) 92 (1999) 95 (1993) 86 89 74 79 (1986)

More information

,, Poisson 3 3. t t y,, y n Nµ, σ 2 y i µ + ɛ i ɛ i N0, σ 2 E[y i ] µ * i y i x i y i α + βx i + ɛ i ɛ i N0, σ 2, α, β *3 y i E[y i ] α + βx i

,, Poisson 3 3. t t y,, y n Nµ, σ 2 y i µ + ɛ i ɛ i N0, σ 2 E[y i ] µ * i y i x i y i α + βx i + ɛ i ɛ i N0, σ 2, α, β *3 y i E[y i ] α + βx i Armitage.? SAS.2 µ, µ 2, µ 3 a, a 2, a 3 a µ + a 2 µ 2 + a 3 µ 3 µ, µ 2, µ 3 µ, µ 2, µ 3 log a, a 2, a 3 a µ + a 2 µ 2 + a 3 µ 3 µ, µ 2, µ 3 * 2 2. y t y y y Poisson y * ,, Poisson 3 3. t t y,, y n Nµ,

More information

kubostat2017b p.1 agenda I 2017 (b) probability distribution and maximum likelihood estimation :

kubostat2017b p.1 agenda I 2017 (b) probability distribution and maximum likelihood estimation : kubostat2017b p.1 agenda I 2017 (b) probabilit distribution and maimum likelihood estimation [email protected] http://goo.gl/76c4i 2017 11 14 : 2017 11 07 15:43 1 : 2 3? 4 kubostat2017b (http://goo.gl/76c4i)

More information

こんにちは由美子です

こんにちは由美子です Analysis of Variance 2 two sample t test analysis of variance (ANOVA) CO 3 3 1 EFV1 µ 1 µ 2 µ 3 H 0 H 0 : µ 1 = µ 2 = µ 3 H A : Group 1 Group 2.. Group k population mean µ 1 µ µ κ SD σ 1 σ σ κ sample mean

More information

seminar0220a.dvi

seminar0220a.dvi 1 Hi-Stat 2 16 2 20 16:30-18:00 2 2 217 1 COE 4 COE RA E-MAIL: [email protected] 2004 2 25 S-PLUS S-PLUS S-PLUS S-code 2 [8] [8] [8] 1 2 ARFIMA(p, d, q) FI(d) φ(l)(1 L) d x t = θ(l)ε t ({ε t }

More information

1 Stata SEM LightStone 4 SEM 4.. Alan C. Acock, Discovering Structural Equation Modeling Using Stata, Revised Edition, Stata Press 3.

1 Stata SEM LightStone 4 SEM 4.. Alan C. Acock, Discovering Structural Equation Modeling Using Stata, Revised Edition, Stata Press 3. 1 Stata SEM LightStone 4 SEM 4.. Alan C. Acock, 2013. Discovering Structural Equation Modeling Using Stata, Revised Edition, Stata Press 3. 2 4, 2. 1 2 2 Depress Conservative. 3., 3,. SES66 Alien67 Alien71,

More information

Attendance Demand for J-League õ Shinsuke KAWAI* and Takeo HIRATA* Abstract The purpose of this study was to clarify the variables determining the attendance in J-league matches, using the 2,699 J-league

More information

Stata 11 Stata ts (ARMA) ARCH/GARCH whitepaper mwp 3 mwp-083 arch ARCH 11 mwp-051 arch postestimation 27 mwp-056 arima ARMA 35 mwp-003 arima postestim

Stata 11 Stata ts (ARMA) ARCH/GARCH whitepaper mwp 3 mwp-083 arch ARCH 11 mwp-051 arch postestimation 27 mwp-056 arima ARMA 35 mwp-003 arima postestim TS001 Stata 11 Stata ts (ARMA) ARCH/GARCH whitepaper mwp 3 mwp-083 arch ARCH 11 mwp-051 arch postestimation 27 mwp-056 arima ARMA 35 mwp-003 arima postestimation 49 mwp-055 corrgram/ac/pac 56 mwp-009 dfgls

More information

tokei01.dvi

tokei01.dvi 2. :,,,. :.... Apr. - Jul., 26FY Dept. of Mechanical Engineering, Saga Univ., JAPAN 4 3. (probability),, 1. : : n, α A, A a/n. :, p, p Apr. - Jul., 26FY Dept. of Mechanical Engineering, Saga Univ., JAPAN

More information

dvi

dvi 2017 65 2 185 200 2017 1 2 2016 12 28 2017 5 17 5 24 PITCHf/x PITCHf/x PITCHf/x MLB 2014 PITCHf/x 1. 1 223 8522 3 14 1 2 223 8522 3 14 1 186 65 2 2017 PITCHf/x 1.1 PITCHf/x PITCHf/x SPORTVISION MLB 30

More information

Jorgenson F, L : L: Inada lim F =, lim F L = k L lim F =, lim F L = 2 L F >, F L > 3 F <, F LL < 4 λ >, λf, L = F λ, λl 5 Y = Const a L a < α < CES? C

Jorgenson F, L : L: Inada lim F =, lim F L = k L lim F =, lim F L = 2 L F >, F L > 3 F <, F LL < 4 λ >, λf, L = F λ, λl 5 Y = Const a L a < α < CES? C 27 [email protected] 27 4 3 Jorgenson Tobin q : Hayashi s Theorem Jordan Saddle Path. GDP % GDP 2. 3. 4.. Tobin q 2 2. Jorgenson F, L : L: Inada lim F =, lim F L = k L lim F =, lim F L = 2 L F >, F

More information

& 3 3 ' ' (., (Pixel), (Light Intensity) (Random Variable). (Joint Probability). V., V = {,,, V }. i x i x = (x, x,, x V ) T. x i i (State Variable),

& 3 3 ' ' (., (Pixel), (Light Intensity) (Random Variable). (Joint Probability). V., V = {,,, V }. i x i x = (x, x,, x V ) T. x i i (State Variable), .... Deeping and Expansion of Large-Scale Random Fields and Probabilistic Image Processing Kazuyuki Tanaka The mathematical frameworks of probabilistic image processing are formulated by means of Markov

More information

Winter 図 1 図 OECD OECD OECD OECD 2003

Winter 図 1 図 OECD OECD OECD OECD 2003 266 Vol. 44 No. 3 I 序論 Mirrlees 1971 Diamond 1998 Saez 2002 Kaplow 2008 1 700 900 1, 300 1, 700 II III IV V II わが国の再分配の状況と国際比較 OECD Forster and Mira d Ercole 2005 2006 2001 Winter 08 267 図 1 図 2 2000 2

More information

医系の統計入門第 2 版 サンプルページ この本の定価 判型などは, 以下の URL からご覧いただけます. このサンプルページの内容は, 第 2 版 1 刷発行時のものです.

医系の統計入門第 2 版 サンプルページ この本の定価 判型などは, 以下の URL からご覧いただけます.   このサンプルページの内容は, 第 2 版 1 刷発行時のものです. 医系の統計入門第 2 版 サンプルページ この本の定価 判型などは, 以下の URL からご覧いただけます. http://www.morikita.co.jp/books/mid/009192 このサンプルページの内容は, 第 2 版 1 刷発行時のものです. i 2 t 1. 2. 3 2 3. 6 4. 7 5. n 2 ν 6. 2 7. 2003 ii 2 2013 10 iii 1987

More information

(p.2 ( ) 1 2 ( ) Fisher, Ronald A.1932, 1971, 1973a, 1973b) treatment group controll group (error function) 2 (Legendre, Adrian

(p.2 ( ) 1 2 ( ) Fisher, Ronald A.1932, 1971, 1973a, 1973b) treatment group controll group (error function) 2 (Legendre, Adrian 2004 1 1 1.1 Maddala(1993) Mátyás and Sevestre (1996) Hsiao(2003) Baltagi(2001) Lee(2002) Woolridge(2002a), Arellano(2003) Journal of Econometrics Econometrica Greene(2000) Maddala(2001) Johnston and Di-

More information

kubostat2017c p (c) Poisson regression, a generalized linear model (GLM) : :

kubostat2017c p (c) Poisson regression, a generalized linear model (GLM) : : kubostat2017c p.1 2017 (c), a generalized linear model (GLM) : [email protected] http://goo.gl/76c4i 2017 11 14 : 2017 11 07 15:43 kubostat2017c (http://goo.gl/76c4i) 2017 (c) 2017 11 14 1 / 47 agenda

More information

オーストラリア研究紀要 36号(P)☆/3.橋本

オーストラリア研究紀要 36号(P)☆/3.橋本 36 p.9 202010 Tourism Demand and the per capita GDP : Evidence from Australia Keiji Hashimoto Otemon Gakuin University Abstract Using Australian quarterly data1981: 2 2009: 4some time-series econometrics

More information

第2回:データの加工・整理

第2回:データの加工・整理 2 2018 4 13 1 / 24 1. 2. Excel 3. Stata 4. Stata 5. Stata 2 / 24 1 cross section data e.g., 47 2009 time series data e.g., 1999 2014 5 panel data e.g., 47 1999 2014 5 3 / 24 micro data aggregate data 4

More information

日本の高齢者世帯の貯蓄行動に関する実証分析

日本の高齢者世帯の貯蓄行動に関する実証分析 196 2017 * ** ** 1 2 3 JEL Classification Codes D14, D15, E21 Keywords * 28 Hyun- Hoon Lee Robert Owen Kwanho Shin ** 29 196 An Empirical Analysis of the Saving Behavior of Elderly Households in Japan

More information

カルマンフィルターによるベータ推定( )

カルマンフィルターによるベータ推定( ) β TOPIX 1 22 β β smoothness priors (the Capital Asset Pricing Model, CAPM) CAPM 1 β β β β smoothness priors :,,. E-mail: [email protected]., 104 1 TOPIX β Z i = β i Z m + α i (1) Z i Z m α i α i β i (the

More information

waseda2010a-jukaiki1-main.dvi

waseda2010a-jukaiki1-main.dvi November, 2 Contents 6 2 8 3 3 3 32 32 33 5 34 34 6 35 35 7 4 R 2 7 4 4 9 42 42 2 43 44 2 5 : 2 5 5 23 52 52 23 53 53 23 54 24 6 24 6 6 26 62 62 26 63 t 27 7 27 7 7 28 72 72 28 73 36) 29 8 29 8 29 82 3

More information

2009 5 1...1 2...3 2.1...3 2.2...3 3...10 3.1...10 3.1.1...10 3.1.2... 11 3.2...14 3.2.1...14 3.2.2...16 3.3...18 3.4...19 3.4.1...19 3.4.2...20 3.4.3...21 4...24 4.1...24 4.2...24 4.3 WinBUGS...25 4.4...28

More information

03.Œk’ì

03.Œk’ì HRS KG NG-HRS NG-KG AIC Fama 1965 Mandelbrot Blattberg Gonedes t t Kariya, et. al. Nagahara ARCH EngleGARCH Bollerslev EGARCH Nelson GARCH Heynen, et. al. r n r n =σ n w n logσ n =α +βlogσ n 1 + v n w

More information

Microsoft Word - 計量研修テキスト_第5版).doc

Microsoft Word - 計量研修テキスト_第5版).doc Q10-2 テキスト P191 1. 記述統計量 ( 変数 :YY95) 表示変数として 平均 中央値 最大値 最小値 標準偏差 観測値 を選択 A. 都道府県別 Descriptive Statistics for YY95 Categorized by values of PREFNUM Date: 05/11/06 Time: 14:36 Sample: 1990 2002 Included

More information