財政赤字の経済分析:中長期的視点からの考察

Similar documents
金融政策の波及経路と政策手段

# GDP 1 GDP 1992 GDP Hamilton and Flavin (1986) Doi and Ihori(2003) (2007) 2 Bohn(1998) /GDP Bohn # 1 2 Broda

消費の経済理論の形成と消費関数論争

日本経済の変動要因:生産性ショックの役割

財政赤字の経済分析:中長期的視点からの考察

1990年代以降の日本の経済変動

遺産相続、学歴及び退職金の決定要因に関する実証分析 『家族関係、就労、退職金及び教育・資産の世代間移転に関する世帯アンケート調査』

土地税制の理論的・計量的分析

LA-VAR Toda- Yamamoto(1995) VAR (Lag Augmented vector autoregressive model LA-VAR ) 2 2 Nordhaus(1975) 3 1 (D2)

Autumn II III Zon and Muysken 2005 Zon and Muysken 2005 IV II 障害者への所得移転の経済効果 分析に用いるデータ

shuron.dvi

インフレの不確実性とインフレ率水準の関係

日本における財政政策のインパクトー1990年代のイベント・スタディー

COE-RES Discussion Paper Series Center of Excellence Project The Normative Evaluation and Social Choice of Contemporary Economic Systems Graduate Scho

物価変動の決定要因について ― 需給ギャップと物価変動の関係の国際比較を中心に―


1 Nelson-Siegel Nelson and Siegel(1987) 3 Nelson-Siegel 3 Nelson-Siegel 2 3 Nelson-Siegel 2 Nelson-Siegel Litterman and Scheinkman(199

○松本委員

1 GDP

Title 最適年金の理論 Author(s) 藤井, 隆雄 ; 林, 史明 ; 入谷, 純 ; 小黒, 一正 Citation Issue Date Type Technical Report Text Version publisher URL

財政のサステナビリティと長期金利の動向

Winter 図 1 図 OECD OECD OECD OECD 2003

Microsoft Word - Šv”|“Å‘I.DOC

Jorgenson F, L : L: Inada lim F =, lim F L = k L lim F =, lim F L = 2 L F >, F L > 3 F <, F LL < 4 λ >, λf, L = F λ, λl 5 Y = Const a L a < α < CES? C

Discussion Paper #

p *2 DSGEDynamic Stochastic General Equilibrium New Keynesian *2 2

(2004 ) 2 (A) (B) (C) 3 (1987) (1988) Shimono and Tachibanaki(1985) (2008) , % 2 (1999) (2005) 3 (2005) (2006) (2008)

研究シリーズ第40号

D = [a, b] [c, d] D ij P ij (ξ ij, η ij ) f S(f,, {P ij }) S(f,, {P ij }) = = k m i=1 j=1 m n f(ξ ij, η ij )(x i x i 1 )(y j y j 1 ) = i=1 j

201711grade1ouyou.pdf

³ÎΨÏÀ

ボーナス制度と家計貯蓄率-サーベイ・データによる再検証-

448 Vol. 44 No 図


02.„o“φiflì„㙃fic†j

微分積分 サンプルページ この本の定価 判型などは, 以下の URL からご覧いただけます. このサンプルページの内容は, 初版 1 刷発行時のものです.

<966B8DE2905E88EA2E696E6464>

医系の統計入門第 2 版 サンプルページ この本の定価 判型などは, 以下の URL からご覧いただけます. このサンプルページの内容は, 第 2 版 1 刷発行時のものです.

I-2 (100 ) (1) y(x) y dy dx y d2 y dx 2 (a) y + 2y 3y = 9e 2x (b) x 2 y 6y = 5x 4 (2) Bernoulli B n (n = 0, 1, 2,...) x e x 1 = n=0 B 0 B 1 B 2 (3) co

デフォルト相関係数のインプライド推計( )

高齢化とマクロ投資比率―国際パネルデータを用いた分析―

1. (8) (1) (x + y) + (x + y) = 0 () (x + y ) 5xy = 0 (3) (x y + 3y 3 ) (x 3 + xy ) = 0 (4) x tan y x y + x = 0 (5) x = y + x + y (6) = x + y 1 x y 3 (

最終報告書.PDF

国債管理:その原則と日本の現状

ii 3.,. 4. F. (), ,,. 8.,. 1. (75%) (25%) =7 20, =7 21 (. ). 1.,, (). 3.,. 1. ().,.,.,.,.,. () (12 )., (), 0. 2., 1., 0,.

, 1), 2) (Markov-Switching Vector Autoregression, MSVAR), 3) 3, ,, , TOPIX, , explosive. 2,.,,,.,, 1

II Karel Švadlenka * [1] 1.1* 5 23 m d2 x dt 2 = cdx kx + mg dt. c, g, k, m 1.2* u = au + bv v = cu + dv v u a, b, c, d R

所得税と課税最低限に関する一考察

global imbalances ) * 1

デフレ不況下の金融政策をめぐる政治過程

Auerbach and Kotlikoff(1987) (1987) (1988) 4 (2004) 5 Diamond(1965) Auerbach and Kotlikoff(1987) 1 ( ) ,

1 st 2 nd Dec

朕醩佑宖醸æ−žã†®ã†�ã‡†ã†®æ··å’‹æŁ´æŁ°è¨‹çfl»ã…¢ã…⁄ã…«

.2 ρ dv dt = ρk grad p + 3 η grad (divv) + η 2 v.3 divh = 0, rote + c H t = 0 dive = ρ, H = 0, E = ρ, roth c E t = c ρv E + H c t = 0 H c E t = c ρv T

N cos s s cos ψ e e e e 3 3 e e 3 e 3 e

..3. Ω, Ω F, P Ω, F, P ). ) F a) A, A,..., A i,... F A i F. b) A F A c F c) Ω F. ) A F A P A),. a) 0 P A) b) P Ω) c) [ ] A, A,..., A i,... F i j A i A

日本内科学会雑誌第102巻第4号

Part () () Γ Part ,

() x + y + y + x dy dx = 0 () dy + xy = x dx y + x y ( 5) ( s55906) 0.7. (). 5 (). ( 6) ( s6590) 0.8 m n. 0.9 n n A. ( 6) ( s6590) f A (λ) = det(a λi)

第2章 経済成長と所得分配: マレーシアの事例を中心に

1 filename=mathformula tex 1 ax 2 + bx + c = 0, x = b ± b 2 4ac, (1.1) 2a x 1 + x 2 = b a, x 1x 2 = c a, (1.2) ax 2 + 2b x + c = 0, x = b ± b 2

基調的なインフレ率とフィリップス曲線

x () g(x) = f(t) dt f(x), F (x) 3x () g(x) g (x) f(x), F (x) (3) h(x) = x 3x tf(t) dt.9 = {(x, y) ; x, y, x + y } f(x, y) = xy( x y). h (x) f(x), F (x

TOP URL 1

(Compton Scattering) Beaming 1 exp [i (k x ωt)] k λ k = 2π/λ ω = 2πν k = ω/c k x ωt ( ω ) k α c, k k x ωt η αβ k α x β diag( + ++) x β = (ct, x) O O x

LLG-R8.Nisus.pdf

koji07-01.dvi

低金利環境下でのフィット向上を目指した最近のイールド・カーブ・モデル群

2016 (8) Variety Expansion Effects by Feenstra (1994) 1 Variety Effects Dixit and Stiglitz (1977) CES n n? n t U t = ( nt i=1 σ > 1, a it > 0,

SNAと家計調査における貯蓄率の乖離-日本の貯蓄率低下の要因-

Masahiro NAKANO Keynes benchmark Keynes 89

銀行手数料ビジネスの動向と経営安定性

自殺の経済社会的要因に関する調査研究報告書

(1.2) T D = 0 T = D = 30 kn 1.2 (1.4) 2F W = 0 F = W/2 = 300 kn/2 = 150 kn 1.3 (1.9) R = W 1 + W 2 = = 1100 N. (1.9) W 2 b W 1 a = 0

小塚匡文.indd

税制改正にともなう家計の所得弾性値 : 高齢者パネルデータによる実証分析

放射線専門医認定試験(2009・20回)/HOHS‐05(基礎二次)

プログラム

meiji_resume_1.PDF

I ( ) 1 de Broglie 1 (de Broglie) p λ k h Planck ( Js) p = h λ = k (1) h 2π : Dirac k B Boltzmann ( J/K) T U = 3 2 k BT

A = A x x + A y y + A, B = B x x + B y y + B, C = C x x + C y y + C..6 x y A B C = A x x + A y y + A B x B y B C x C y C { B = A x x + A y y + A y B B

原油価格,為替レートショックと日本経済

1: 合計特殊出生率 出生率の推移 暦年 アメリカドイツフランス スウェーデン日本 Apps and Re

社会保障と公的年金

n 2 + π2 6 x [10 n x] x = lim n 10 n n 10 k x 1.1. a 1, a 2,, a n, (a n ) n=1 {a n } n=1 1.2 ( ). {a n } n=1 Q ε > 0 N N m, n N a m

基礎数学I

POS POS JEL Classification Number: E30 Keywords: ; POS ; ; ; 18GS0101

untitled

36 3 D f(z) D z f(z) z Taylor z D C f(z) z C C f (z) C f(z) f (z) f(z) D C D D z C C 3.: f(z) 3. f (z) f 2 (z) D D D D D f (z) f 2 (z) D D f (z) f 2 (

c 2009 i

chap10.dvi

通信容量制約を考慮したフィードバック制御 - 電子情報通信学会 情報理論研究会(IT) 若手研究者のための講演会

総研大恒星進化概要.dvi

untitled

2.5 (Gauss) (flux) v(r)( ) S n S v n v n (1) v n S = v n S = v S, n S S. n n S v S v Minoru TANAKA (Osaka Univ.) I(2012), Sec p. 1/30

2 G(k) e ikx = (ik) n x n n! n=0 (k ) ( ) X n = ( i) n n k n G(k) k=0 F (k) ln G(k) = ln e ikx n κ n F (k) = F (k) (ik) n n= n! κ n κ n = ( i) n n k n

II 2 II

chap9.dvi

V(x) m e V 0 cos x π x π V(x) = x < π, x > π V 0 (i) x = 0 (V(x) V 0 (1 x 2 /2)) n n d 2 f dξ 2ξ d f 2 dξ + 2n f = 0 H n (ξ) (ii) H

u = u(t, x 1,..., x d ) : R R d C λ i = 1 := x 2 1 x 2 d d Euclid Laplace Schrödinger N := {1, 2, 3,... } Z := {..., 3, 2, 1,, 1, 2, 3

Transcription:

000 364 645 (ax smoohing (Barro(979

Barro(979 (consumpion smoohing Hall(978 Campbell(987 Barro(979 Hall(978 Campbell(987 Campbell(987

B ( r B G T ( ( r E B G T Y T/Y r ( No Ponzi Game ( [ Ω ] Y ( lim ( r B ( GDP (n 00 (3 Y ( ( [ ( n /( r ] [ ( n/( r ] g ( r b (4 ( ( ( r T ( r G ( r B g G/Y b B/Y 0 (3 No Ponzi Game Trehan and Walsh(988

(4 ( E [ Ω ] ( (5 i i (4 (5 [ ] (6 ( i R R E g i Ω (r - nb i 0 R (n/(r (5 ( GDP ( GDP 3 3 i ( i i i i ( i (

(6 GDP 4 Barro(979 [ ] [ ] log( B / B α0 απ α P ( G G / B α3 log( Y / Y( PG rb / B 7 B B G ( Y GDP P G Y GDP 3 Barro 979 9 76 Hall(978 (5 Barro(98 884 979 Sahasakul(986 (6 4 Barro(979

Sahasakul(986 (6 X m α 0 α g α b α 3 X ε 3 0 g (6 / 937 8 Huang and Lin (993 Ghosh(995 Campbell(987 Barro(979 GDP (5 (4

6 5 Ghosh(995 Campbell(987 ( GDP SUR g ( r n b (9 (6 (9 SUR i R i E [ g ] (0 i Ω i i i (0 SUR SUR (0 Campbell(987 (0 SUR VAR Z C ( L Z U 5 Sahasakul(986

p- Z (, g SUR, C(L C0 CL Λ Cp-L U p Z C0Z U 6 k E [ Ω ] Z i C k Z (0 SUR i i i R C (,0 Z 0 (,0RC (I-RC 0 0 - Z ( RC - 0 (I - RC 0 λ Λ λ 3 λ λ 4 ( SUR λ g λ SUR 0 Ghosh(995 96 88 6 Huang and Lin (993

96 88 Huang and Lin (993 99 88 947 88 7 g Trehan and Walsh(988 Trehan and Walsh(988 r i T ( E ( ( rb ( r G i Ω r i 0 T G 8 890 986 Mankiw(987 Mankiw(987 7 Huang and Lin(993 8 ( (6

Mankiw(987 95 85 9 Poerba and Roemberg(990 (89 986 ( (946 86 Mankiw(987 Poerba and Roemberg(990 ( ( (99 (99 9 Mankiw(987

(993 (993 Barro(979 Barro(979 (889 99(944 (965 990 965 990 975 990 (993 (i 75 (ii 83 (iii 89 (993 (iphillips and Perron (iicochrane (iiihall(978 Phillips and Perron Cochrane Hall(978

(993 Campbell(987 Campbell(987 Ghosh(995 Huang and Lin(993 E( i i (3 (r( / (r( / (5 ( ( Γ G r (4 ( ( ( ( B G r T r

ln Γ ln Γ ln( r ln( G / Γ r k ( / ρ(ln G ln Γ (6 g ψ 0 0 ρ ( r g γ (7 0 g ln G ln g g -g - k Φ ( r ( T (8 φ 0 0 ρ ( r γ (9 lnt ln - - 0 (6 Campbell and Mankiw(989 / /

(5 (8 (4 0 0 0 0 0 0 ( / (b0 0 k (0 b0 ln 0 k 3 (7 (9 0 0 (0 (3 3 B/ B/ / ln ] [ln E Ω ] [ ] [ ln ln ] ln [ln ] ( [ ] [ ] [ y E y E y E y y y E E E Ω Ω Ω Ω Ω Ω (/ ( g s θ ρ

s E[ ρ ( g (/ θ y Ω ] ( y ln Y s (/ g (( / b ( i i ( ( Campbell(987 s g y VAR s g y p VAR C(L - u (s g y C(L C0 CL C -L - (L u Z (s s -P g g -P y y -P (

Z AZ - U E(Z A i Z ( λ Z ( h ( / θ k ρ A Z (3 l h k p p p (3 λ ( h (/ θ k ρ A ( h (/ θ k ρa( I ρa λ ( λ h ( / θ k ρ A (4 - s g ( / θ y (/ ρ s v (5 v E(v 0 4 s g y (5 (5 s g y (5 4 (5

s ( / (/ 0 s-i g -i g θ y ρ s a a i a i a3 i y-i a i a i a 3 i 0 p i i 5 p i p i (7 955 97 (6 (T (G (B GDP ( (Y GDP( 0.0 0.95 0.99 6 5 5 6 Schwarz Bayes ( p p p 3

957 97 s y (7 Wald Wald p 0.00 0.0 (7 965 965 97 s Wald p 0.005 0.03 (993 (965 90 Wald p ( (3 s (993 7 s (3 4 7 (993 950 90 Hall(978

s λ Z ( λ h ( / θ k ρ AZ (8 ( (L (8 s s s 8 964 974 980 (99 997 998 999 9 8 T T Texp( (S -S T G (T -G (T-G 9 998 999

(9 ( T Y r C ω GDP r n 00 r n 9 GDP 30 3 (3 ( ( / T T T T C C (3 ( T Y C ω (30 ( T Y C ω

s b g s / (( / ( θ θ θ b g s / (( / ( θ θ θ ( s s θ [ ] ( ( [ ] ( ( s s Y Y ln ln ln ln ln ln ln θ ( [ ] (33 exp s s θ (33 (3

T C / C exp [ θ ( s s ] (34 T 34 s s C /C (957 97 C/C C/C 4.3 970 C/C 970 974 974 983 996 005 C/C.0.05 957 97 0 C/C.06.069 0 S

970 Alesina and Tabellini(990 Alesina and Tabellini(990 970

Alesina, Albero and Guildo Tabellini (990 "A Posiive Theory of Fiscal Deficis and Governmen Deb", Review of Economic Sudies 57, pp40-44. Barro, Rober (979 "On he Deerminaion of he Public Deb", Journal of Poliical Economy 87, pp940-97. Barro, Rober (98 "On he Predicabiliy of Tax-Rae Changes", NBER Working Paper, #636. Campbell, John (987 "Does Saving Anicipae Declining Labor Income? An Alernaive Tes of he Permanen Income Hypohesis", Economerica 55, pp49-73. Campbell, John and Gregory Mankiw (989 "Consumpion, Income and Ineres Raes: Reinerpreing he Time Series Evidence", in Oliver Blanchard and Sanley Fischer eds. NBER Macroeconomics Annual, MIT Press. Ghosh, Aish (995 "Ineremporal Tax-Smoohing and he Governmen Budge Surplus: Canada and he Unied Saes", Journal of Money, Credi, and Banking 7(4, pp033-045. Hall, Rober (978 "Sochasic Implicaions of he Life Cycle-Permanen Income Hypohesis: Theory and Evidence", Journal of Poliical Economy 86, pp97-987. Huang, Chao-Hsi and Kenneh Lin (993 "Deficis, Governmen Expendiures, and Tax Smoohing in he Unied Saes: 99-988", Journal of Moneary Economics 3(3, pp37-339. Mankiw, Gregory (987 "The Opimal Collecion of Seigniorage: Theory and Evidence", Journal of Moneary Economics 0(, pp37-34. Poerba, James and Julio Roemberg (990 "Inflaion and Taxaion wih Opimizing Governmens", Journal of Money, Credi, and Banking (, pp-8.

Sahasakul, Chaipa (986 "The U.S. Evidence on Opimal Taxaion over Time" Journal of Moneary Economics 8(3, pp5-75. Trehan, Bhara and Carl Walsh (988 "Common Trends, he Governmen's Budge Consrain, and Revenue Smoohing", Journal of Economic Dynamics and Conrol (/3, pp45-444. Trehan, Bhara and Carl Walsh (990 "Seigniorage and Tax Smoohing in he Unied Saes 94-986", Journal of Moneary Economics 5(, pp97-. (99 975 90,. (993 3,. (99, pp66-73,.