Similar documents
中京大学経済学論叢 23 号 2012 年 3 月 審査論文 1 Keywords: JEL Classi cation: L13, L22, L33 1 * *1 Inoue, Kamijo, and Tomaru (2009) Mukherjee and Suestrong

通し組/2.論説:大橋克成

濱田弘潤 : 多角化企業の利潤分析 77 多角化企業の利潤分析 多角化ディスカウントの寡占理論による説明 * 濱田弘潤 (diversification discount) Keywords: JEL classifications: D43, L13, L22, G

bottleneckjapanese.dvi

<90AD8DF489C88A D322E696E6462>


(EHChamberlin) (ESMason) (JSBain) (RECaves) (CKaysen) (DFTurner) (FMScherer) (1) - (2) (1) (Structure) (2) (Conduct) (3) (Performance) (S

New Public Management NPM Walsh Leibenstein, H. X Leibenstein1966 Leibenstein1969 X X X X Blois ue

1 Flores, D. (009) All you can drink: should we worry about quality? Journal of Regulatory Economics 35(1), Saggi, K., and Vettas, N. (00) On in

2 (cf. 1995) (1) (Call Externality) (2) (Network Externality) / 2 Leibenstein (1950) Rohlfs(1974) 1.1 Leibenstein(1950) (Morgenstern 1948) (Von Neuman


導入

株式保有構成と企業価値 ─コーポレート・ガバナンスに関する一考察─

村本 孜51‐85/51‐85

平成12年度 対日直接投資増加の理由と日本経済にもたらす影響に関する調査 第2章 対日投資と多国籍企業の戦略について

経済研究 Vol. 67 No. 1 Jan 寡占における相対利潤最大化企業による戦略変数の選択 * 佐藤敦紘 田中靖人 差別化された財を生産する対称的な寡占において各企業が絶対利潤 ( 自らの利潤そのもの ) ではなく相対利潤 ( 自分の利潤と他の企業の利潤の平均値との差 ) を最大化


2015 : (heterogenous) Heterogeneous homogeneous Heterogenous agent model Bewley 1 (The Overlapping-Generations Models:OLG) OLG OLG Allais (1

わが国企業による資金調達方法の選択問題


2 / 24

2) 3) 2) Ohkusa, 1996 ; 1999 ; Ohtake and Ohkusa, 1994 ; La Croix and A. Kawamura, Reject American Economic Review, Journal of Political Econom

橡motonishi.PDF


59-1・2 鳥居昭夫・春日教測 .pwd


「リストラ中高年」の行方


60 Vol. 44 No. 1 2 準市場 化の制度的枠組み: 英国 教育改革法 1988 の例 Education Reform Act a School Performance Tables LEA 4 LEA LEA 3

組織の経済学:企業の境界

z.prn(Gray)

Title ベンチャー企業の研究開発支出の決定要因 日本と台湾の事例を中心に Author(s) 蘇, 顯揚 Citation 經濟論叢 (1996), 158(1): Issue Date URL Right

incompatible 2. 基 本 となるモデル オリジナルモデル A B, A x A B x A B x B A x B x A x B x A x B x B x A A B i AB t Hendricks et al. 84

<303395C48DE88D8E95462E696E6464>

デフレ不況下の金融政策をめぐる政治過程

2 DEA Bain Mann Strickland and Weiss Structure Conduct Performance S-C-P Brozen Demsetz

[17]Holmström and Tirole (2000) (1) (2) (1) (2) 1 1 2




_03.indd

66-5 足代訓史.pwd

バーリ&ミーンズの株式会社論

金/金

Title 役員持株は企業業績に影響を与えるか? Author(s) 久保, 克行 Citation Issue Date Type Technical Report Text Version publisher URL


産業・企業レベルデータで見た日本の経済成長.pdf

表紙参照.PDF

60.0% 40.0% 28.4% 31.7% 36.2% 43.0% 48.4% 50.5% 52.5% 20.0% 0.0%


IMF World Economic Outlook, April GDP GDP.,,,,,..,.

Discussion Paper #

2017 : (heterogenous) Heterogeneous homogeneous Heterogenous agent model Bewley 1 exante (The Overlapping-Generations Models:OLG) OLG OLG Al

untitled

Masahiro NAKANO Keynes benchmark Keynes 89

早稲田大学現代政治経済研究所 ダブルトラック オークションの実験研究 宇都伸之早稲田大学上條良夫高知工科大学船木由喜彦早稲田大学 No.J1401 Working Paper Series Institute for Research in Contemporary Political and Ec

物価指数の計測誤差と品質調整手法:わが国CPIからの教訓

- March


BB 報告書完成版_修正版) doc

BJ-Vol.11 04 長坂文夫.indd

アジ研教科書「マクロ安定化」.PDF

中国の家計所得と消費構造に関する分析

季刊 企業と法創造 第1巻第4号(通巻第4号)

小平 裕29‐54/29‐54

取引銀行の破綻が企業経営に及ぼす影響について-阪和銀行破綻の事例分析-

Kobe University Repository : Kernel タイトル Title 著者 Author(s) 掲載誌 巻号 ページ Citation 刊行日 Issue date 資源タイプ Resource Type 版区分 Resource Version 権利 Rights DOI

海外市場参入研究アプローチの概観 

46−ª3�=4�“ƒ‚S“·‚Ö‡¦

, FAD FAD FED FAO FAO WFP 1999 NGO ) 1. FAD FAD 1999 Lee, FAD % national coping s

1 1 1 [2000]

Osaka University of Economics Working Paper Series No Optimal Environmental Policy under Monopolistic Provision of Environmental Technology 20


2007年度 修士論文

<96D889BA904D2E696E6464>

19世紀の物価動向―コンドラチェフによる物価長波の検討を通じて―*

IMF http : // htm




:

小阪玄次郎先生.indd

Ver. 1.0 (discretion) (revenue management) (fictitious revenue recognition) (window dressing) (fraudulent accounting practice) SEC (General


【表紙】経済学論叢_18号/表1・3・背

D F I CP (equity finance) CP (debt finance) ( )

坪沼

07-245_25.indd

74% , China Labor Watch ,

ワールド・ワイド 10‐2(P)/3.中尾

untitled

(1) (Karlan, 2004) (1) (1973) (1978) (1991) (1991) 1

OECD Benartzi and Thaler Brown et al. Mottla and Utkus Rooiji et al. Atkinson et al. MacFarland et al. Elton et al. Tang et al. Benartzi and Thaler Br

shuron.dvi

Walter et al. 2009: 1 Helleiner 1994 Strange 1971: Gilpin 1987: -65 Strange b, 1998c,

keizai_2012N.indd

商学 66‐2☆/3.大原

GDPギャップと潜在成長率

keyneshicks4.dvi

Microsoft Word - 厚生の平等_京阪経済研究会.doc

Transcription:

[ 1 ] Barcena-Ruiz, J. C., and M. P. Espinosa, 1996, Long-term or Short-term Managerial Incentive Contracts, Journal of Economics and Management Strategy 5, 343-359. [2] Barros, F., 1995, Incentive Schemes as Strategic Variables : An Application to a Mixed Duopoly, International Journal of Industrial Organization 13, 373-386. [ 3 ] Basu, K., 1993, Lectures in Industrial Organization Theory, Blackwell, Oxford. [ 4 ] Berle. A. A. and G. C. Means, 1932, The Modern Corporation and Private Property, Macmillan, New York. [ 5 ] Bos, D., 1991, Privatization : A Theoretical Treatment, Clarendon Press, Oxford. [ 6 ] Bulow, J. I., J. D. Geanakoplos and P. D. Klemperer, 1985, Multimarket Oligopoly: Strategic Substitutes and Complements, Journal of Political Economy 93, 488-511. [ 7 ] Cremer, H., M. Marchand and J. -F. Thisse, 1991, Mixed Oligopoly with Differentiated Products, International Journal of Industrial Organization 9, 43-53. [ 8 ] DeFraja, G., 1993, Unions and Wages in Public and Private Firms : A Game Theoretic Analysis, Oxford Economic Papers 45, 457-469. [ 9 ] DeFraja, G., and F. Delbono, 1989, Alternative Strategies of a Public Enterprise Oxford Economic Papers 41, 302-311. in Oligopoly, [10] Fershtman, C., and K. L. Judd, 1987, Equilibrium Incentives in Oligopoly, American Economic Review 77, 927-940. [11] Fudenburg, D., and J. Tirole, 1984, The Fat Cat Effect, the Puppy Dog Ploy, and the Lean and Hungry Look, American Economic Review, Papers and Proceeding 4, 361-368. [12] Hotelling, H., 1929, Stability in Competition, Economic Journal 39, 41-57. [13] Katz, M., 1991, Game Playing Agents : Contracts as Precommitments, RAND Journal of Economics 22, 392-409. [15] Matsumura, T., and N. Matsushima, 2003, Mixed Oligopoly, Foreign Firms, and Location Choice, mimeo. [16] Merrill, W. C., and N. Schneider, 1966, Government Firms in Oligopoly Industries : A Short Run Analysis, Quarterly Journal of Economics 80,114-134. [17] Miller, N. H., and A. I. Pazgal, 2001, The Equivalence of Price and Quantity Competition with Delegation, RAND Journal of Economics 32,284-301. [18] Nett, L., 1993, Mixed Oligopoly with Homogeneous Goods, Annuals of Public and Comparative Economics 64,367-393. [19] Nett, L., 1994, Why Private Firms are More Innovative than Public Firms, European Journal of Political Economy 10,639-653. [20] Nishimori, A., and H. Ogawa, 2002, Public Monopoly, Mixed Oligopoly and Productive Efficiency, Australian Economic Papers 41,185-190. [21] Sen, A., 1993, Entry and Managerial Incentives, International Journal of Industrial Organization 11,123-137. [22] Sklivas, S. D., 1987, The Strategic Choice of Managerial Incentives, RAND Journal of Economics 18,452-458. [23] Szymanski, S., 1994, Strategic Delegation with Endogenous Costs : A Duopoly with Wage Bargaining, International Journal of Industrial Organization 12,105-116. [24] Tirole, J., 1988, The Theory of Industrial Organization, MIT Press, Cambridge. [25] Vickers, J., 1985, Delegation and the Theory of the Firm, Economic Journal (Supplement) 95, 138-147. [26] White, M., 2001, Managerial Incentives and the Decision to Hire Managers in Markets with Public and Private Firms, European Journal of Political Economy 17,877-896. [27] Willner, J., 1994, Welfare Maximization with

Endogenous Average Costs, International Journal of Industrial Organization 12, 373-386. [28] Willner, J., 1999, Policy Objectives and Performance in a Mixed Market with Bargaining, International Journal of Industrial Organization 17, 137-145.