オーストラリア研究紀要 36号(P)☆/3.橋本

Similar documents
Microsoft Word - 計量研修テキスト_第5版).doc

50-4 平井健之.pwd

Microsoft Word - 計量研修テキスト_第5版).doc

Microsoft Word - 計量研修テキスト_第5版).doc

% 10%, 35%( 1029 ) p (a) 1 p 95% (b) 1 Std. Err. (c) p 40% 5% (d) p 1: STATA (1). prtesti One-sample test of pr

高齢化とマクロ投資比率―国際パネルデータを用いた分析―

Microsoft Word - 計量研修テキスト_第5版).doc

R による共和分分析 1. 共和分分析を行う 1.1 パッケージ urca インスツールする 共和分分析をするために R のパッケージ urca をインスツールする パッケージとは通常の R には含まれていない 追加的な R のコマンドの集まりのようなものである R には追加的に 600 以上のパッ

LA-VAR Toda- Yamamoto(1995) VAR (Lag Augmented vector autoregressive model LA-VAR ) 2 2 Nordhaus(1975) 3 1 (D2)

149 (Newell [5]) Newell [5], [1], [1], [11] Li,Ryu, and Song [2], [11] Li,Ryu, and Song [2], [1] 1) 2) ( ) ( ) 3) T : 2 a : 3 a 1 :

自由集会時系列part2web.key

こんにちは由美子です

tnbp59-21_Web:P2/ky132379509610002944

Stepwise Chow Test * Chow Test Chow Test Stepwise Chow Test Stepwise Chow Test Stepwise Chow Test Riddell Riddell first step second step sub-step Step

こんにちは由美子です


パーキンソン病治療ガイドライン2002

研修コーナー

浜松医科大学紀要

fiúŁÄ”s‘ê‡ÌŁª”U…−…X…N…v…„…~…A…•‡Ì ”s‘ê™´›ß…−…^†[…fiŠ‚ª›Âfl’«

Studies of Foot Form for Footwear Design (Part 9) : Characteristics of the Foot Form of Young and Elder Women Based on their Sizes of Ball Joint Girth

第11回:線形回帰モデルのOLS推定

卒業論文

<95DB8C9288E397C389C88A E696E6462>

JFE.dvi


1 12 *1 *2 (1991) (1992) (2002) (1991) (1992) (2002) 13 (1991) (1992) (2002) *1 (2003) *2 (1997) 1

わが国企業による資金調達方法の選択問題

2 33,**. + : +/* /++** +/* /++** +/* /++** /** /** F+ +*** F+ +*** / 1*42.,43 /14+,*42 /, , 134,.,43 / 0-41,*42.4, -/41,*43,34,,+4. +

4.9 Hausman Test Time Fixed Effects Model vs Time Random Effects Model Two-way Fixed Effects Model

Stata 11 Stata ROC whitepaper mwp anova/oneway 3 mwp-042 kwallis Kruskal Wallis 28 mwp-045 ranksum/median / 31 mwp-047 roctab/roccomp ROC 34 mwp-050 s

日本内科学会雑誌第102巻第4号

dvi

Microsoft Word - 計量研修テキスト_第5版).doc

28 Horizontal angle correction using straight line detection in an equirectangular image

ñ{ï 01-65

Stata 11 Stata ts (ARMA) ARCH/GARCH whitepaper mwp 3 mwp-083 arch ARCH 11 mwp-051 arch postestimation 27 mwp-056 arima ARMA 35 mwp-003 arima postestim

第90回日本感染症学会学術講演会抄録(I)

Ł\”ƒ-2005

J-LEAGUE 8000 V.Kawasaki Urawa.R 5000 J-LEAGUE

市区町村別平均寿命の全国順位の変化からみた青森県市町村平均寿命の解析

PowerPoint プレゼンテーション

J. JILA 64 (5), 2001

Law and Economics Review vol.4,no.1(february 2009) 1998

評論・社会科学 123号(P)☆/1.福田

201711grade2.pdf

日本における化石燃料と経済成長の因果性分析 - 多変数アプローチに基づいて 石田葉月 Discussion Paper April 2011 Graduate School of Economics and Osaka School of International Public Pol

082_rev2_utf8.pdf

...v..&.{..&....

こんにちは由美子です

4703ALL01

7. フィリップス曲線 経済統計分析 (2014 年度秋学期 ) フィリップス曲線の推定 ( 経済理論との関連 ) フィリップス曲線とは何か? 物価と失業の関係 トレード オフ 政策運営 ( 財政 金融政策 ) への含意 ( 計量分析の手法 ) 関数形の選択 ( 関係が直線的でない場合の推定 ) 推

Fig. 2 Signal plane divided into cell of DWT Fig. 1 Schematic diagram for the monitoring system


Vol. 36, Special Issue, S 3 S 18 (2015) PK Phase I Introduction to Pharmacokinetic Analysis Focus on Phase I Study 1 2 Kazuro Ikawa 1 and Jun Tanaka 2

Dependent Variable: LOG(GDP00/(E*HOUR)) Date: 02/27/06 Time: 16:39 Sample (adjusted): 1994Q1 2005Q3 Included observations: 47 after adjustments C -1.5


Perspective-Taking Perspective-Taking.... Vol. No.

, 1), 2) (Markov-Switching Vector Autoregression, MSVAR), 3) 3, ,, , TOPIX, , explosive. 2,.,,,.,, 1

seminar0220a.dvi

2 The Bulletin of Meiji University of Integrative Medicine 3, Yamashita 10 11

.. est table TwoSLS1 TwoSLS2 GMM het,b(%9.5f) se Variable TwoSLS1 TwoSLS2 GMM_het hi_empunion totchr

2 1,2, , 2 ( ) (1) (2) (3) (4) Cameron and Trivedi(1998) , (1987) (1982) Agresti(2003)

Transcription:

36 p.9 202010 Tourism Demand and the per capita GDP : Evidence from Australia Keiji Hashimoto Otemon Gakuin University Abstract Using Australian quarterly data1981: 2 2009: 4some time-series econometrics methods are applied to the analysis into the relationship between the per capita GDP and the tourism demand captured by the numbers of visitors arriving. On the stationality of the numbers of the long-termmore than one yearvisitors, and of the short-termless than one yearvisitors, along with the real per capita GDP, ADF tests are conducted. We found there are stationary relationships between the tourism demand and the per capita GDP by the estimation results of the Error Correction Mechanism. Further, the causalities in a sense of Granger between the long-term visitors and the change of per capita GDP are found. Key words : Tourism demand in Australia, Unit Root Test, ADF Test, Co-integration Test, Granger Causality. JEL Classification : L 83, C 01, E 10.

GDP 1981: 2 2009: 4 GDP 1 1 GDP GDP GDP Granger ADF Granger

1 UNWTO Tourism GDP Song and Li2008Song, Witt and Li2009 GDP 2 ABSAustralian Bureau of Statistics1 LTDSeries ID: A 1830883 C1 STD Series ID: A 1830888 R 1981 2 2009 4 3 1 GDP2008 1 LTD STD RPGDP 2008 Mean Median Maximum Minimum Std. Dev. Observations 30,205 20,450 143,440 4,300 27,471 115 861,914 903,200 1,618,800 191,600 428,946 115 10,173 9,544 14,617 7,112 1,948 115 1981 2 2009 4

GDP GDP GDP Series ID : A 2302467 ASeries ID : A 2133251 W Series ID : A 2303940 RABS 3 1 LTD 3 1 STD 86 GDP 1 1982 2009 LTD 9.30 STD 6.76 RPGDP 2.02 3 2007 2009 LTD 34 STD 560 RPGDP 5.5 1 2 LTD 1 4 STD 4 2 1 1 LTD 2 1 STD

3 GDP : RPGDP 2008 3 GDP 2008 3 LTD, STD RPGDP spurious regression LTD, STD RPGDP Augmented Dickey-FullerADF ADF Xt Δ Xtβ 1β 2tδ Xt 1α i Δ Xt 1ε t m!i1 1 Δ Xt Δ XtXt Xt 1, t ADF δ 0 1 X LTD, STD RPGDP LTD STD 1 δ RPGDP 5 RPGDP 1 Δ RPGDP 2 1LTD, STD, RPGDP Δ RPGDP δ t Augmented Dickey Fuller test statistic

GDP 2 1Null Hypothesis : LTD has a unit root Augmented Dickey-Fuller test statistic 3.619351Prob.0.0326 2Null Hypothesis : STD has a unit root Augmented Dickey-Fuller test statistic 10.7868Prob.0.0000 3Null Hypothesis : RPGDP has a unit root Augmented Dickey-Fuller test statistic 3.343872Prob.0.0646 4Null Hypothesis : Δ RPGDP has a unit root Augmented Dickey-Fuller test statistic 11.6282Prob.0.0000 4 GDP LTD STD GDP RPGDPta1a2LTDtμ t RPGDPtb1b2STDtν t 2 3 LTD STD RPGDP 23 23 RPGDP LTD RPGDP STD μ t ν t 23 Augmented Engle Granger AEG 23 RPGDPt8500.6260.055364 LTDt t50.0220813.27542 Prob0.0000 0.0000 Adjusted R-squared0.605859 Durbin-Watson stat2.226812 RPGDPt6637.8680.004101 LTDt t37.5760122.33319 Prob0.0000 0.0000 Adjusted R-squared0.813656 Durbin-Watson stat0.674764 4 5

5 4 Δμ t1.136730 μ t 1 t12.06676 Prob0.0000 Adjusted R squared0.562921 Durbin Watson stat1.832028 6 Δμ t μ t 1 RPGDP LTD 5 Δμ t0.336270 ν t 1 t4.744106 Prob0.0000 Adjusted R squared0.166042 Durbin Watson stat2.495898 7 RPGDP STD RPGDP LTD RPGDP STD 1 Δ RPGDPt65.486080.018143 Δ LTD 0.038053 μ t 1 t1.4655266.115324 0.631455 Prob.0.1456 0 0.529 Adjusted R squared0.418268 Durbin Watson stat2.706876 8 Δ RPGDPt30.274280.001973 Δ STD 0.201142 ν t 1 t0.5701045.09251 2.957116 Prob.0.5698 0 0.0038 Adjusted R squared0.183325 Durbin Watson stat2.984955 9

GDP 8 GDP RPGDP 1 LTD 0.0189 1 STD 0.0019 LTD STD GDP 45 GDP 1 1 LTD 0.055STD 0.004 45LTD, STD, RPGDP 1 45 Δ RPGDP/Δ LTD LTD/RPGDP 0.05536430205.22/10172.90.164386 Δ RPGDP/Δ STD STD/RPGDP 0.004101861913.9/10172.90.347463 GDP 1 0.1641 0.347 45 GDP 1 GDP 5Granger Granger GDP Granger X Y

Xt α iyt 1 β jxt ju1t n!i1 n!j1 Yt λ iyt i n!i1 δ jxt ju2t n!j1 10 11 10Y α i011 X n!i1 δ j0y X Granger n!j1 Y X Y X Y X 2 RPGDP GDP 1011 X, Y RPGDP RPGDP LTD 1 RPGDP STD 1 Granger RPGDP 3 A Granger Null Hypothesis Obs No. of Lags F-Statistic Prob. Decision Direction of Causality Causality LTD does not Granger Cause ΔRGDP 114 112 111 110 109 108 107 106 105 104 103 102 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 0.13019 1.69147 0.76826 2.77618 2.72028 3.38353 2.90371 3.10961 2.58483 3.31576 2.64118 2.37538 0.7189 0.1886 0.5143 0.0309 0.0241 0.0046 0.0087 0.0038 0.011 0.0012 0.0062 0.0116 LTD ΔRGDP STD does not Granger Cause ΔRGDP 114 112 111 110 109 108 107 106 105 104 103 102 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 0.94256 0.72345 13.6815 3.66816 2.30451 1.96857 1.71752 1.68383 1.95176 1.99924 1.93332 1.71423 0.3337 4.87 E 01 1.00 E 07 0.0078 0.0502 0.0778 0.1145 0.1133 0.055 0.0435 0.0469 0.0799 STD ΔRGDP

GDP 3 B Granger Null Hypothesis Obs No. of Lags F-Statistic Prob. Decision Direction of Causality Causality ΔRGDP does not Granger Cause LTD 114 112 111 110 109 108 107 106 105 104 103 102 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 92.4642 57.8867 73.9098 6.74416 5.53855 4.29505 2.70373 1.88466 1.77833 1.75157 1.29488 0.94445 3.00 E 16 9.00 E 18 1.00 E 25 7.00 E 05 0.0002 0.0007 0.0136 0.0722 0.084 0.0828 0.2427 0.5083 ΔRGDP LTD ΔRGDP does not Granger Cause STD 114 112 111 110 109 108 107 106 105 104 103 102 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 24.0933 13.8393 6.92819 3.4371 1.58662 1.24276 1.03728 0.83814 1.05525 1.04618 0.93242 1.06745 3.00 E 06 5.00 E 06 0.0003 0.0112 0.1709 0.2916 0.4108 0.5716 0.404 0.4131 0.5142 0.3989 ΔRGDP STD 3A 3BF 5 4A 4B GDP 4A 4 12 LTD RPGDP 47 1 RPGDP 4B STD 3, 4 RPGDP GDP

4A Obs No. of Lags Tourism Demand Direction of Causality Change of Real per capita GDP 114 112 111 110 109 108 107 106 105 104 103 102 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 LTD ΔRGDP 4B Obs No. of Lags Tourism Demand Direction of Causality Change of Real per capita GDP 114 112 111 110 109 108 107 106 105 104 103 102 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 STD NONE NONE NONE NONE NONE NONE ΔRGDP 6 1 GDP GDP Granger GDP GDP GDP

GDP Gujarati, D. N2003Basic Econometrics, 4th edition, McGraw Hill. Gujarati, D. N. and D. C. Porter2003Essentials of Econometrics, 4 th edition, McGraw Hill. Narayan, P. K2003Tourism Demand and Modelling : Some Issues Regarding Unit Roots, Co integration and Diagnostic Test,International Journal of Tourism Research, 5, 369 380. Song, H. and G. Li2008Tourism Demand Modelling and ForecastingA Review of Recent Research,Tourism Management, 29, pp.203 220. Song, H., S. F. Witt and G. Li2009The Advanced Econometrics of Tourism Demand, Routledge. 2010 8 St. Lucia Campus on Queensland University, 8 27 Tourism Demand and Economic Growth in Australia : Some Econometrics View ABS Dr. Timothy J. Lee