C. R. McKenzie 2003 3 2004 ( 38 ) 2 2004 2005 (Keio Household Panel Survey) control group treatment group 1



Similar documents
放射線専門医認定試験(2009・20回)/HOHS‐01(基礎一次)


一般演題(ポスター)

第85 回日本感染症学会総会学術集会後抄録(I)

* 積極的労働市場政策と若年雇用 山本勲野原快太 DD DD

Winter 図 1 図 OECD OECD OECD OECD 2003

日本内科学会雑誌第98巻第3号

yakuri06023‡Ì…R…s†[

本組/根間弘海




第86回日本感染症学会総会学術集会後抄録(II)

OSIPP41_p1_2.eps

第101回 日本美容外科学会誌/nbgkp‐01(大扉)

27巻3号/FUJSYU03‐107(プログラム)

パーキンソン病治療ガイドライン2002

tnbp59-20_Web:P1/ky108679509610002943


2014 年 9 月 8 日掲載承認 * 積極的労働市場政策と若年雇用 山本勲野原快太 DD DD

tnbp59-17_Web:プO1/ky079888509610003201

untitled


,255 7, ,355 4,452 3,420 3,736 8,206 4, , ,992 6, ,646 4,

受賞講演要旨2012cs3

日本内科学会雑誌第97巻第3号

,.,,.,. NIRA,.,.,,, GDP.,., 1%, 2.0% 3).,,.,,., 1, 4).,,.,, GDP,.,,.,,,.,,., 2002.,,., 3), Q&A Q16 (

dプログラム_1

第89回日本感染症学会学術講演会後抄録(I)

higp-15(プロ1日目)/ky220147284100029951


bottleneckjapanese.dvi

橡同居選択における所得の影響(DP原稿).PDF

z.prn(Gray)


BB 報告書完成版_修正版) doc

ron04-02/ky768450316800035946

表紙_目次.PDF

第85 回日本感染症学会総会学術集会後抄録(III)

自殺の経済社会的要因に関する調査研究報告書


Contents

Microsimulation of Personal Income Tax Reform from Tax Deductions to Tax Credit Takero Doi Abstract: Using data from the Japan Household

untitled

CW3_A12220D27.indd

60 Vol. 44 No. 1 2 準市場 化の制度的枠組み: 英国 教育改革法 1988 の例 Education Reform Act a School Performance Tables LEA 4 LEA LEA 3

Microsoft Word - Šv”|“Å‘I.DOC

Title ベンチャー企業の研究開発支出の決定要因 日本と台湾の事例を中心に Author(s) 蘇, 顯揚 Citation 經濟論叢 (1996), 158(1): Issue Date URL Right

IMES DISCUSSION PAPER SERIES Discussion Paper No. 99-J- 9 -J-19 INSTITUTE FOR MONETARY AND ECONOMIC STUDIES BANK OF JAPAN

CONTENTS N T

日本の高齢者世帯の貯蓄行動に関する実証分析

【表紙】経済学論叢_18号/表1・3・背

Transcription:

KEIO UNIVERSITY MARKET QUALITY RESEARCH PROJECT (A 21 st Century Center of Excellence Project) DP2005-020 * C. R. McKenzie** 2003 3 2004 ( 38 ) 2 2004 2005 (Keio Household Panel Survey) control group treatment group * ** Graduate School of Economics and Graduate School of Business and Commerce, Keio University 2-15-45 Mita, Minato-ku, Tokyo 108-8345, Japan

C. R. McKenzie 2003 3 2004 ( 38 ) 2 2004 2005 (Keio Household Panel Survey) control group treatment group 1

1 2003 3 2004 ( 38 ) (Keio Household Panel Survey) 80 EITC (Earned Income Tax Credits) WFTC (Working Family Tax Credit) (tax credit) (Blundell and Macurdy, 1999). 1986 EITC Eissa and Liebman (1996) DD 1986 Eissa and Liebman (1996) control group treatment group DD EITC Blundell et. al. (1998) 80 Blundell et. al. (1998) (1995) 100 (1995) 35.6% 2

24.8% (2001) (1995) 1999 1990 1995 (2003) 0.4% 2 3 (2005) 1100 2004 2004 DD 2 3

1961 1987 2 1 2004 (b) (a) 1995 1000 2 1 2003 70 76 (38 38 (a)) 70 (a) 103 0 103 103 141 (b) 100 103 2001 130 100 2003 2-1 (a) 2004 38 10% 3.8 20% 7.6 (a) 70 4

3 Eissa and Liebman (1996) Eissa and Liebman (1996) DD DD treatment group control group control group treatment group treatment group control group P lfp = 1) = Φ( α + β Χ + γ treat + γ year04 + γ ( treat year04 )), (3-1) ( it p p it p0 i p1 t p2 i t lfpit 1 0 treati year04t treatment group 2004 1 X it 2 7 7 14 treat year04 i t 70 γ treatment p2 γ p2 5

HW it = α + β Χ + γ treat + γ year04 + γ ( 2 treat year04 ) + ε h h it h0 i h1 t h i t it, (3-2) HWit 3-2 2004 35 3-1 3-2 γ h2 4 1 2004 2 2005 (Keio Household Panel Survey) KHPS 1 3 2 20 69 4000 1 4005 2 attrition rate 17.3% 1 2 (3 1) KHPS2004 1 (1 12 ) 1 0 KHPS2004 1 (1 12 ) KHPS2005 1 1 12 1 1 1 0 1 1 KHPS2004 KHPS2005 KHPS2005 KHPS2004 KHPS2005 1 2004 1 3 2003 2004 2004 1 3 6

KHPS2004 KHPS2004 2004 KHPS2004 KHPS2005 2003 3 2004 KHPS2004 2003 DD treatment group control group 4 1 DD control group t-1 t KHPS2004 t-1 t control group 2 control group t-1 treatment group t (3-1) (3-2) treatment group control group 4 2 (3-1) 4 1 treatment group control group 2 ( ) 0.2 treatment group ( 0.1) control group 0.3 0.1 0.3 treatment group 0 control group 1000 0 7

control group (3-2) 3 treatment group control group 2004 3 treatment group control group 4 3 3486 733 5 2003 1000 65 5 1. 5 1 DD 0.05 10% 20 65 KHPS 5 2 2003 ( 15 ) 2004 ( 16 ) 20 65 3 KHPS 2 81% 75% KHPS 2003 89% 2004 93% 2004 2 57% KHPS 2003 64% 2004 73% 2 8

2 KHPS2004 KHPS2005 KHPS 20 65 1 1 1 2003 57.9% 2004 59.6% 2003 79.4% 2004 80.8% 2 2 KHPS2004 KHPS2005 KHPS 2 5 1 5 3 treatment group control Pooled OLS random effects model 1% 2004 treatment pooled OLS random effects random effects 5 4 control group treatment group 330 10% 330 990 20% pooled OLS random effects random effects 2004 treatment (1995) (2001) 9

10% control group 20% treatment group 5 5 2004 treatment 5 5 0% control group treatment group 5 2 5 6 DD 70-5.31 (3-2) KHPS2004 35 KHPS2005 70 4 2 3 5 7 control group treatment group 2004 treatment pooled OLS random effects KHPS 4 DD 5 8 6 5 9 control group treatment group Pooled OLS random effects control group treatment group 5 10 10

5 7 5 9 2004 treatment pooled OLS random effects KHPS 4 5 9 random effects 6 2004 2004 2004 2005 KHPS control group treatment group KHPS 4 (2003) 11

(2003) pp.113-133 (1995) 31 pp. 120-134 (1999) 35, pp.77-95. 2001) No. 493. pp. 15-29. (1995) pp.185-219. (2001) 103 No. 489, pp. 60-61. (2005) 2005 Blundell, R., A. Duncan, and C. Meghir (1998) Estimating Labor Supply Responses Using Tax Reforms Econometrica, 66(4), pp. 827-861. Blundell, R. and T. Macurdy (1999) "Labor Supply: A Review of Alternative Approaches" in Orley, A. and D. Card, Handbook of Labor Economics Vol.III A, North Holland. Eissa, N., and J. B. Liebman (1996), Labor Supply Response to the Earned Income Tax Credit, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 111(2), pp. 605-637. MODSIM2005, 12

2 1 (2003 ) 76 (a) 38 38 38 (b) 103 141 13