WeinerWright 2005 100 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 Australia 1996 2000 100 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 Canada 1995 1999 2003 100 90 80 70 60 50 40 30



Similar documents
RBA RBA TSM 2) RBA Visa MC RBA RBA RBA


中田真佐男 323‐352/323‐352

66-5 足代訓史.pwd

通し組/F7:論説:西垣鳴人(送り)

村本 孜51‐85/51‐85

橡motonishi.PDF

Winter 2009 No Lower Earnings Limit

bottleneckjapanese.dvi

取引法の観点からみた資金決済に関する諸問題



Ver. 1.0 (discretion) (revenue management) (fictitious revenue recognition) (window dressing) (fraudulent accounting practice) SEC (General

60 Vol. 44 No. 1 2 準市場 化の制度的枠組み: 英国 教育改革法 1988 の例 Education Reform Act a School Performance Tables LEA 4 LEA LEA 3


(EHChamberlin) (ESMason) (JSBain) (RECaves) (CKaysen) (DFTurner) (FMScherer) (1) - (2) (1) (Structure) (2) (Conduct) (3) (Performance) (S

BB 報告書完成版_修正版) doc

GDPギャップと潜在成長率


わが国銀行業の将来像― 預金通貨需要からのアプローチによるマクロ的サイズの検討―

I

物価変動の決定要因について ― 需給ギャップと物価変動の関係の国際比較を中心に―

No.7, (2006) 2 Electronic Funds Transfer as the Foundation of the Monetary Value of Electronic Money - A Study on the JBA 1 Integrated Circuit


<346B5F BC8CC389AE91E58A A AD985F8F D A967B95B62E696E6462>

Central Processing Unit 2

Title ベンチャー企業の研究開発支出の決定要因 日本と台湾の事例を中心に Author(s) 蘇, 顯揚 Citation 經濟論叢 (1996), 158(1): Issue Date URL Right

Winter 図 1 図 OECD OECD OECD OECD 2003

公務員倫理問題への新アプローチ

2-栗原.TXT

物価指数の計測誤差と品質調整手法:わが国CPIからの教訓

PDFŠpŒ{Ł¶


<96D889BA904D2E696E6464>

Summer 08 Le Grand,Julian 2003 図 1 knight-knave Queen-Pawn Social Democracy knight Pawn knave Queen 1 Barr Nicholas The Economics of the Welfare State

_16_.indd

IC Web Lehdonvirta 2011 Moriyama IC Web Web Web 146


59-72OGUMA.indd

電子マネーと通信産業の戦略


株式保有構成と企業価値 ─コーポレート・ガバナンスに関する一考察─

untitled

Association of South East Asian Nations: ASEAN ASEAN ASEAN ASEAN ASEAN ASEAN ASEAN

untitled

, 3, 1999, 4,,

03.™ƒ−ÔŁñ“’

ブック 1.indb

5 I The Current Situation and Future Prospects of the North Korean Economy presented at the 2014 Korea Dialogue Conference on Strengthenin

電子マネー・システムにおけるセキュリティ対策:リスク管理に焦点を当てて

untitled

untitled

, FAD FAD FED FAO FAO WFP 1999 NGO ) 1. FAD FAD 1999 Lee, FAD % national coping s

<90AD8DF489C88A D322E696E6462>

濱田弘潤 : 多角化企業の利潤分析 77 多角化企業の利潤分析 多角化ディスカウントの寡占理論による説明 * 濱田弘潤 (diversification discount) Keywords: JEL classifications: D43, L13, L22, G

BJ-Vol.11 04 長坂文夫.indd

ディスクロージャーの実効性確保

07-245_25.indd

IEEJ: PJM RTO Tradable Obligations System 2

表紙_目次.PDF

untitled

取引銀行の破綻が企業経営に及ぼす影響について-阪和銀行破綻の事例分析-

戦間期日本企業の資金調達、資本コスト、資本構成:最適資本構成理論からみた1930年代における企業財務

第2章 経済成長と所得分配: マレーシアの事例を中心に

国際文化20号.indd

†sŸ_Ł¶†t›ÍŠlŁª(P26†`)/−Ø“‚‡É‡¨‡¯‡é…}…j…t…F…X…gŁ†‰y†`

導入

-February FRB BIS IMF BIS Spillover Spillovers BIS IMF EMEs

(1) (Karlan, 2004) (1) (1973) (1978) (1991) (1991) 1

1 1 1 [2000]

自殺の経済社会的要因に関する調査研究報告書

_03.indd

untitled

Microsoft Word - 荳ュ蟲カ諱オ

わが国企業による資金調達方法の選択問題

上場変更と株価:株主分散と流動性変化のインパクト

_›ªficŸaŁF

野村資本市場研究所|アジアの金融競争力(PDF)

デフレ不況下の金融政策をめぐる政治過程

アジアの資本移動の変化に関するクラスター分析 アジア域内の証券投資活性化に向けて

GDP tax expenditure GDP GDP GDP TANF GDP

2

個人消費支出からみた戦間期の景気変動:LTES個人消費支出の再推計

1 4 4 [3] SNS 5 SNS , ,000 [2] c 2013 Information Processing Society of Japan

Assessing the Role of Intellectual Property Laws from a Social Network Perspective by Shinto Teramoto at ARS 13 workshop, June 201

[1987][2000] Awareness

59-1・2 鳥居昭夫・春日教測 .pwd

2 (cf. 1995) (1) (Call Externality) (2) (Network Externality) / 2 Leibenstein (1950) Rohlfs(1974) 1.1 Leibenstein(1950) (Morgenstern 1948) (Von Neuman

headquarter Gertner et al. winner-picking Wal-Mart s

国際学研究 2‐1☆/目次(2‐1)

1 Flores, D. (009) All you can drink: should we worry about quality? Journal of Regulatory Economics 35(1), Saggi, K., and Vettas, N. (00) On in

160_cov.indd

OSIPPニュースレター.indd

SNAと家計調査における貯蓄率の乖離-日本の貯蓄率低下の要因-

IMF http : // htm

6) 7) MBO management buy-out 2 necessity sufficiency ) 21

# _信金7月号.indb

金/金


KII, Masanobu Vol.7 No Spring

Transcription:

1)

WeinerWright 2005 100 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 Australia 1996 2000 100 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 Canada 1995 1999 2003 100 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 Denmark 1994 1998 2003 Garcia Swartz Humphrey paper-base paper-base 100 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 Mexico 2001 2004 100 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 Natherlands 1995 1999 2003 100 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 Spain 1994 1998 2002 GDP Sweden UK USA pp.159 100 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 1995 1999 2003 100 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 1995 1999 2003 100 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 1995 2000 2003 Debit Card Credit Card Check Other

Garcia Swartz2004 HP Share of Sales Volae 100 80 60 40 20 0 5 10 10 20 20 40 40 60 60 80 80 100 100 500 500 Other Debit Card Credit Card Check Cash Transaction Size pp 677678 2)

default Two-sided MarketsTSM ATM 3) Two-sidedMarkets TSM platform Platform 4) TSM TSM side i-mode

OS TSM Evans 2005 Evans Evans Open Closed 5) closedproprietary T&E JCB

open 3party VISA 6) Calfornia pays p+f System pays p m (f : customer fee) (m: merchant discount) National BankAmerica, NBI VISA Cardholder sells a good or service Merchant MC Open openvisamc 4party TSM Merchant Bank AcquirerIssuer default Platform Platform A I VISAMC Interchange Fee I Interchange Fee 4party Honor-all-card No-Surcharge Issuer Acquirer Closed 3party proprietary pays p+f (f: customer fee) pays pa (a: interchange fee) pays pm (m: merchant discount) TSM Cardholder sells a good or service at price p Merchant

Interchange FeeIF IF Open IF IF IF Issuer Merchant s BankAcquirer Merchant BankAcquirer IF Merchant BankAcquirer Issuer IF IF IF IF IF Mm Cf I Merchant BankA IF IF IF IF IF NaBanco Nabannco Visa IF IF Wal-Mart Wal-Mart Visa MC Anti trust Debit Credit Honor-allcards rule RBA IF IF EC Visa IF IF

Interchange Fee f Open IF I A IFa A I IF A I IFaA I IF f m Interchange Fee Multihome IF f m IF Credit card bm not used (socially c I+cA inefficient) ca Credit card not used (socially efficient) c I Credit card used (socially efficient) Credit card not used (socially inefficient) c I+cA b C p bc f bmmissuer ciacquier cainterchange FeeIFa bcbm cica bcbmcica

bc cibm ca bccibm ca bc cibmca Closed Loop Issuer Acquier bcbm cicabccibm ca bcf f cica bm bm f cicabccica Open Loop Interchange FeeIF f bc I A IFa A m caa IF I a cif m caacacif bcf bm m bm cacibc IF I A IF GansKing p s f ci m ca s s f bc bmm s bmm s bmm s f bc f ci m ca bmca cibc IF Baxter IF Gans and King IF Rochet and Tirole Schmalensee

Wright Interchange Fee NaBanco IF NaBanco IF I Visa IF Scherman IF TSM IF 7) IF IF m IF 8) IF IF I A IF IF Open Closed Closed 9) RBA RBA RBA VisaMasterCardBankcard RBA report Surcharge IF RBA IF IF IF IF HayashiIF IF Hayashi IF

IF Hayashi2006 IF 1.60 1.40 1.20 1.00 0.80 0.60 0.40 0.20 Before Regulation After Regulation Current IF IF 0.00 Australia EU UK USA IF IF IF Hayashi2006 Review of Network Economics IF 1.00 Master Card (offline) 0.80 Visa (offline) Star (online) 0.60 NYCE (online) Pulse (online) Interlink (online) 0.40 Maestro (online) Accel/Exchange (online) 0.20 Shazam (online) Networks (online) 0.00 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 IF IF 20052 1) 2) http://www.jccia.or.jp/ 3) 200534Two-sided market 4) Evans [2003] a, Evans [2003] b 5) Evans and Schmalensee [2005] a 6) 2003VISA 7) Evans and Schmalensee [2005] b 8) RBA http://www.rba. gov.au/ 9) Chang and Evans [2005]

VISA UFJ UFJUC DC JCB SAISON OMC AEON TOP NICOS ORICOJACCS LIFE CF JR NTT VISAMasterCard AMEX

IC IC CAT http://www.jccia.or.jp/ 2003 IC 20052 2004 20052005J16 2003VISA Baxter, William F.1983. Bank Exchange of Transactional Paper : Legal and Economic Perspectives, Journal of Law and Economics, vol.26, no.3 (October), pp.541588. Caillaud, Bernard, and Bruno Jullien. 2003. Chicken and Egg : Competition among Intermediation Service Providers, Rand Journal of Economics, vol.34, no.2 (Summer), pp.521552. Chakravorti, Sujit. 2003. Theory of Credit Card Networks : A Survey of the Literature, Review of Network Economics, vol.2. Chakravorti, Sujit, and William R. Emmons. 2003. Who Pays for Credit Cards? Journal of Consumer Affairs, vol.37, no.2. Chang, Howard. S. Evans, and Daniel D. Garcia Swartz. 2005. The Effect of Regulatory Intervention in Two-Sided Markets : An Assessment of Interchange-Fee Capping in Australia, Review of Network Economics, vol.4. Evans, David S. 2003a. Some Empirical Aspects of Multi-Sided Platform Industries, Review of Network Economics, vol.2.. 2003b. The Antitrust Economics of Multi-Sided Platform Markets, Yale Journal on Regulation, vol.20, no.2. Evans, David S., and Richard Schmalensee. 2005a. Paying with Plastic, Cambridge, Massachusetts : MIT Press., and. 2005b. Economic of Interchange Fees and Their Regulation : An Overview, mimeo, pp. Gans, Joshua S., and Stephen P. King. 2003a. Approaches to Regulating Interchange Fees in Payment Systems, Review of Network Economics, vol.2, no.2 (June), pp.125145., and. 2003b. A Theoretical Analysis of Credit Card Reform in Australia, Economic Record, v.79, issue. Garcia Swartz, Daniel D., Robert W. Hahn, and Anne Layne-Farrar. 2004. The Economics of a Cashless Society : An Analysis of the Costs and Benefits of Payment Instruments, AEI- Brookings Joint Center for Regulatory Studies, Related Publication. Hayashi, Fumiko. 2006. A Puzzle of Payment Card Pricing : Why Are Merchants Still Accepting Card Payments? Review of Network Economics, Vol.5, pp.144174.. Humphrey, David, Magnus Willesson, Ted Lindblom, and Göran Bergendahl. 2003. What Does it Cost to Make a Payment? Review of Network Economics, vol.2, no.2 (June), pp.159174. Hunt, Robert M. 2003. An Introduction to the Economics of Payment Card Networks, Review of Network Economics, vol.2, no.2. pp.8096. RBA (2001), Reform of credit card schemes in Australia : A consultation document, RBA : Sydney. RBA (2002), Reform of credit card schemes in Australia : Final reforms and regulation impact statement, RBA : Sydney. RBA/ACCC (2000), Debit and Credit Card Schemes in Australia : A Study of Interchange Fees and Access, RBA : Sydney. Rochet, Jean-Charles. 2003. The Theory of Interchange Fees : A Synthesis of Recent Contributions, Review of Network Economics, vol.2, no.2 (June), pp.97124. Rochet, Jean-Charles, and Jean Tirole. 2002. Cooperation among Competitors : Some Economics of Payment Card Associations, Rand Journal of Economics, vol.33, no.4 (Winter), pp.549570., and. 2003a. An Economic Analysis of the Determination of Inter-

change Fees in Payment Card Systems, Review of Network Economics, vol.2, no.2 (June), pp.6979., and. 2003b. Platform Competition in Two-Sided Markets, Journal of the European Economics Association, vol.1, no 4 (June), pp.9901209. Schmalensee, Richard. 2002. Payment Systems and Interchange Fees, Journal of Industrial Economics, vol.50, no.2 (June), pp.103122.. 2003. Interchange Fees : A Review of the Literature, Payment Card Economics Review, vol.1, no.1 (Winter). Vickers, John. 2005. Public Policy and the Invisible Price : Competition Law, Regulation, and the Interchange Fee, paper presented at a Conference Interchange Fees in Credit and Debit Card Industries : What Role for Public Authorities? Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City, Santa Fe, New Mexico, May46, 2005. Weiner, Stuart E., and Julian Wright. 2005. Interchange Fees in Various Countries : Developments and Determinants, paper presented at a Conference Interchange Fees in Credit and Debit Card Industries : What Role for Public Authorities? Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City, Santa Fe, New Mexico, May46, 2005. Wright, Julian. 2000. An Economic Analysis of a Card Payment Network. Mimeo, NECG and University of Auckland, December.. 2004. One-sided Logic in Two-sided Markets, Review of Network Economics, vol.3, no.1 (March), pp.4464.