. Mac Lane [ML98]. 1 2 (strict monoidal category) S 1 R 3 A S 1 [0, 1] C 2 C End C (1) C 4 1 U q (sl 2 ) Drinfeld double. 6 2

i Version 1.1, (2012/02/22 24),.,..,.,,. R-space,, ( R- space),, Kahler (Kähler C-space)., R-space,., R-space, Hermite,.

R-space ( ) Version 1.1 (2012/02/29) i Version 1.1, (2012/02/22 24),.,..,.,,. R-space,, ( R- space),, Kahler (Kähler C-space)., R-space,., R-space, Hermite,. ii 1 Lie 1 1.1 Killing................................

平成 28 年度 ( 第 38 回 ) 数学入門公開講座テキスト ( 京都大学数理解析研究所, 平成 ~8 28 月年 48 日開催月 1 日 semantics FB 1 x, y, z,... FB 1. FB (Boolean) Functional

1 1.1 semantics F 1 x, y, z,... F 1. F 38 2016 9 1 (oolean) Functional 2. T F F 3. P F (not P ) F 4. P 1 P 2 F (P 1 and P 2 ) F 5. x P 1 P 2 F (let x be P 1 in P 2 ) F 6. F syntax F (let x be (T and y)

2.1 H f 3, SL(2, Z) Γ k (1) f H (2) γ Γ f k γ = f (3) f Γ \H cusp γ SL(2, Z) f k γ Fourier f k γ = a γ (n)e 2πinz/N n=0 (3) γ SL(2, Z) a γ (0) = 0 f c

GL 2 1 Lie SL(2, R) GL(2, A) Gelbart [Ge] 1 3 [Ge] Jacquet-Langlands [JL] Bump [Bu] Borel([Bo]) ([Ko]) ([Mo]) [Mo] 2 2.1 H = {z C Im(z) > 0} Γ SL(2, Z) Γ N N Γ (N) = {γ SL(2, Z) γ = 1 2 mod N} g SL(2,

Chern-Simons Jones 3 Chern-Simons 1 - Chern-Simons - Jones J(K; q) [1] Jones q 1 J (K + ; q) qj (K ; q) = (q 1/2 q

Chern-Simons E-mail: fuji@th.phys.nagoya-u.ac.jp Jones 3 Chern-Simons - Chern-Simons - Jones J(K; q) []Jones q J (K + ; q) qj (K ; q) = (q /2 q /2 )J (K 0 ; q), () J( ; q) =. (2) K Figure : K +, K, K 0

Milnor 1 ( ), IX,. [KN].,. 2 : (1),. (2). 1 ; 1950, Milnor[M1, M2]. Milnor,,. ([Hil, HM, IO, St] ).,.,,, ( 2 5 )., Milnor ( 4.1)..,,., [CEGS],. Ω m, P

Milnor 1 ( ), IX,. [KN].,. 2 : (1),. (2). 1 ; 1950, Milnor[M1, M2]. Milnor,,. ([Hil, HM, IO, St] ).,.,,, ( 2 5 )., Milnor ( 4.1)..,,., [CEGS],. Ω m, PC ( 4 5 )., 5, Milnor Milnor., ( 6 )., (I) Z modulo

2016 Course Description of Undergraduate Seminars (2015 12 16 ) 2016 12 16 ( ) 13:00 15:00 12 16 ( ) 1 21 ( ) 1 13 ( ) 17:00 1 14 ( ) 12:00 1 21 ( ) 15:00 1 27 ( ) 13:00 14:00 2 1 ( ) 17:00 2 3 ( ) 12

2010 ( )

2010 (2010 1 8 2010 1 13 ( 1 29 ( 17:00 2 3 ( e-mail (1 3 (2 (3 (1 (4 2010 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Hesselholt, Lars 12 13 i 1 ( 2 3 Cohen-Macaulay Auslander-Reiten [1] [2] 5 [1], :,, 2002 [2] I Assem,

Twist knot orbifold Chern-Simons

Twist knot orbifold Chern-Simons 1 3 M π F : F (M) M ω = {ω ij }, Ω = {Ω ij }, cs := 1 4π 2 (ω 12 ω 13 ω 23 + ω 12 Ω 12 + ω 13 Ω 13 + ω 23 Ω 23 ) M Chern-Simons., S. Chern J. Simons, F (M) Pontrjagin 2.,

Mazur [Ma1] Schlessinger [Sch] [SL] [Ma1] [Ma1] [Ma2] Galois [] 17 R m R R R M End R M) M R ut R M) M R R G R[G] R G Sets 1 Λ Noether Λ k Λ m Λ k C Λ

Galois ) 0 1 1 2 2 4 3 10 4 12 5 14 16 0 Galois Galois Galois TaylorWiles Fermat [W][TW] Galois Galois Galois 1 Noether 2 1 Mazur [Ma1] Schlessinger [Sch] [SL] [Ma1] [Ma1] [Ma2] Galois [] 17 R m R R R

SAMA- SUKU-RU Contents p-adic families of Eisenstein series (modular form) Hecke Eisenstein Eisenstein p T

SAMA- SUKU-RU Contents 1. 1 2. 7.1. p-adic families of Eisenstein series 3 2.1. modular form Hecke 3 2.2. Eisenstein 5 2.3. Eisenstein p 7 3. 7.2. The projection to the ordinary part 9 3.1. The ordinary

1

1 Borel1956 Groupes linéaire algébriques, Ann. of Math. 64 (1956), 20 82. Chevalley1956/58 Sur la classification des groupes de Lie algébriques, Sém. Chevalley 1956/58, E.N.S., Paris. Tits1959 Sur la classification

等質空間の幾何学入門

2006/12/04 08 tamaru@math.sci.hiroshima-u.ac.jp i, 2006/12/04 08. 2006, 4.,,.,,.,.,.,,.,,,.,.,,.,,,.,. ii 1 1 1.1 :................................... 1 1.2........................................ 2 1.3......................................

0. I II I II (1) linear type: GL( ), Sp( ), O( ), (2) loop type: loop current Kac-Moody affine, hyperbolic (3) diffeo t

e-mail: koyama@math.keio.ac.jp 0. I II I II (1) linear type: GL( ), Sp( ), O( ), (2) loop type: loop current Kac-Moody affine, hyperbolic (3) diffeo type: diffeo universal Teichmuller modular I. I-. Weyl

E1 (4/12)., ( )., 3,4 ( ). ( ) Allen Hatcher, Vector bundle and K-theory ( HP ) 1

E1 (4/12)., ( )., 3,4 ( ). ( ) Allen Hatcher, Vector bundle and K-theory ( HP ) 1 (4/12) 1 1.. 2. F R C H P n F E n := {((x 0,..., x n ), [v 0 : : v n ]) F n+1 P n F n x i v i = 0 }. i=0 E n P n F P n

( 3) b 1 b : b b f : a b 1 b f = f (2.7) g : b c g 1 b = g (2.8) 1 b b (identity arrow) id b f a b g f 1 b b c g (2.9) 3 C C C a, b a b Hom C (a, b) h

2011 9 5 1 Lie 1 2 2.1 (category) (object) a, b, c, a b (arrow, morphism) f : a b (2.1) f a b (2.2) ( 1) f : a b g : b c (composite) g f : a c ( 2) f f a b g f g c g h (2.3) a b c d (2.4) h (g f) = (h

K 2 X = 4 MWG(f), X P 2 F, υ 0 : X P 2 2,, {f λ : X λ P 1 } λ Λ NS(X λ ), (υ 0 ) λ : X λ P 2 ( 1) X 6, f λ K X + F, f ( 1), n, n 1 (cf [10]) X, f : X

2 E 8 1, E 8, [6], II II, E 8, 2, E 8,,, 2 [14],, X/C, f : X P 1 2 3, f, (O), f X NS(X), (O) T ( 1), NS(X), T [15] : MWG(f) NS(X)/T, MWL(f) 0 (T ) NS(X), MWL(f) MWL(f) 0, : {f λ : X λ P 1 } λ Λ NS(X λ

平成 15 年度 ( 第 25 回 ) 数学入門公開講座テキスト ( 京都大学数理解析研究所, 平成 ~8 15 月年 78 日開催月 4 日 ) X 2 = 1 ( ) f 1 (X 1,..., X n ) = 0,..., f r (X 1,..., X n ) = 0 X = (

1 1.1 X 2 = 1 ( ) f 1 (X 1,..., X n ) = 0,..., f r (X 1,..., X n ) = 0 X = (X 1,..., X n ) ( ) X 1,..., X n f 1,..., f r A T X + XA XBR 1 B T X + C T QC = O X 1.2 X 1,..., X n X i X j X j X i = 0, P i

Dynkin Serre Weyl

Dynkin Naoya Enomoto 2003.3. paper Dynkin Introduction Dynkin Lie Lie paper 1 0 Introduction 3 I ( ) Lie Dynkin 4 1 ( ) Lie 4 1.1 Lie ( )................................ 4 1.2 Killing form...........................................

main.dvi

SGC - 70 2, 3 23 ɛ-δ 2.12.8 3 2.92.13 4 2 3 1 2.1 2.102.12 [8][14] [1],[2] [4][7] 2 [4] 1 2009 8 1 1 1.1... 1 1.2... 4 1.3 1... 8 1.4 2... 9 1.5... 12 1.6 1... 16 1.7... 18 1.8... 21 1.9... 23 2 27 2.1

' , 24 :,,,,, ( ) Cech Index theorem 22 5 Stability 44 6 compact 49 7 Donaldson 58 8 Symplectic structure 63 9 Wall crossing 66 1

1998 1998 7 20 26, 44. 400,,., (KEK), ( ) ( )..,.,,,. 1998 1 '98 7 23, 24 :,,,,, ( ) 1 3 2 Cech 6 3 13 4 Index theorem 22 5 Stability 44 6 compact 49 7 Donaldson 58 8 Symplectic structure 63 9 Wall crossing

k + (1/2) S k+(1/2) (Γ 0 (N)) N p Hecke T k+(1/2) (p 2 ) S k+1/2 (Γ 0 (N)) M > 0 2k, M S 2k (Γ 0 (M)) Hecke T 2k (p) (p M) 1.1 ( ). k 2 M N M N f S k+

1 SL 2 (R) γ(z) = az + b cz + d ( ) a b z h, γ = SL c d 2 (R) h 4 N Γ 0 (N) {( ) } a b Γ 0 (N) = SL c d 2 (Z) c 0 mod N θ(z) θ(z) = q n2 q = e 2π 1z, z h n Z Γ 0 (4) j(γ, z) ( ) a b θ(γ(z)) = j(γ, z)θ(z)

2.3. p(n)x n = n=0 i= x = i x x 2 x 3 x..,?. p(n)x n = + x + 2 x x 3 + x + 7 x + x + n=0, n p(n) x n, ( ). p(n) (mother function)., x i = + xi +

( ) : ( ) n, n., = 2+2+,, = 2 + 2 + = 2 + + 2 = + 2 + 2,,,. ( composition.), λ = (2, 2, )... n (partition), λ = (λ, λ 2,..., λ r ), λ λ 2 λ r > 0, r λ i = n i=. r λ, l(λ)., r λ i = n i=, λ, λ., n P n,

第 61 回トポロジーシンポジウム講演集 2014 年 7 月於東北大学 ( ) 1 ( ) [6],[7] J.W. Alexander 3 1 : t 2 t +1=0 4 1 : t 2 3t +1=0 8 2 : 1 3t +3t 2 3t 3 +3t 4 3t 5 + t

( ) 1 ( ) [6],[7] 1. 1928 J.W. Alexander 3 1 : t 2 t +1=0 4 1 : t 2 3t +1=0 8 2 : 1 3t +3t 2 3t 3 +3t 4 3t 5 + t 6 7 7 : 1 5t +9t 2 5t 3 + t 4 ( :25400086) 2010 Mathematics Subject Classification: 57M25,

2/14 2 () (O O) O O (O O) id γ γ id O O γ O O O γ η id id η I O O O O I γ O. O(n) n *5 γ η γ S M, N M N (M N)(n) ( ) M(k) Sk Ind S n S i1 S ik N(i 1 )

1/14 * 1. Vassiliev Hopf P = k P k Kontsevich Bar-Natan P k (g,n) k=g 1+n, n>0, g 0 H 1 g ( S 1 H F(Com) ) ((g, n)) Sn. Com F Feynman ()S 1 H S n ()Kontsevich ( - - Lie ) 1 *2 () [LV12] Koszul 1.1 S F

Anderson ( ) Anderson / 14

Anderson 2008 12 ( ) Anderson 2008 12 1 / 14 Anderson ( ) Anderson 2008 12 2 / 14 Anderson P.W.Anderson 1958 ( ) Anderson 2008 12 3 / 14 Anderson tight binding Anderson tight binding Z d u (x) = V i u

Einstein 1905 Lorentz Maxwell c E p E 2 (pc) 2 = m 2 c 4 (7.1) m E ( ) E p µ =(p 0,p 1,p 2,p 3 )=(p 0, p )= c, p (7.2) x µ =(x 0,x 1,x 2,x

7 7.1 7.1.1 Einstein 1905 Lorentz Maxwell c E p E 2 (pc) 2 = m 2 c 4 (7.1) m E ( ) E p µ =(p 0,p 1,p 2,p 3 )=(p 0, p )= c, p (7.2) x µ =(x 0,x 1,x 2,x 3 )=(x 0, x )=(ct, x ) (7.3) E/c ct K = E mc 2 (7.4)

四変数基本対称式の解放

Solving the simultaneous equation of the symmetric tetravariate polynomials and The roots of a quartic equation Oomori, Yasuhiro in Himeji City, Japan Dec.1, 2011 Abstract 1. S 4 2. 1. {α, β, γ, δ} (1)

Centralizers of Cantor minimal systems

Centralizers of Cantor minimal systems 1 X X X φ (X, φ) (X, φ) φ φ 2 X X X Homeo(X) Homeo(X) φ Homeo(X) x X Orb φ (x) = { φ n (x) ; n Z } x φ x Orb φ (x) X Orb φ (x) x n N 1 φ n (x) = x 1. (X, φ) (i) (X,

1 1, 2016 D B. 1.1,.,,. (1). (2). (3) Milnor., (1) (2)., (3). 1.2,.,, ( )..,.,,. 1.3, webpage,.,,.

1 1, 2016 D B. 1.1,.,,. (1). (2). (3) Milnor., (1) (2)., (3). 1.2,.,, ( )..,.,,. 1.3, 2015. webpage,.,,. 2 1 (1),, ( ). (2),,. (3),.,, : Hashinaga, T., Tamaru, H.: Three-dimensional solvsolitons and the

Black-Scholes [1] Nelson [2] Schrödinger 1 Black Scholes [1] Black-Scholes Nelson [2][3][4] Schrödinger Nelson Parisi Wu [5] Nelson Parisi-W

003 7 14 Black-Scholes [1] Nelson [] Schrödinger 1 Black Scholes [1] Black-Scholes Nelson [][3][4] Schrödinger Nelson Parisi Wu [5] Nelson Parisi-Wu Nelson e-mail: takatoshi-tasaki@nifty.com kabutaro@mocha.freemail.ne.jp

takei.dvi

0 Newton Leibniz ( ) α1 ( ) αn (1) a α1,...,α n (x) u(x) = f(x) x 1 x n α 1 + +α n m 1957 Hans Lewy Lewy 1970 1 1.1 Example 1.1. (2) d 2 u dx 2 Q(x)u = f(x), u(0) = a, 1 du (0) = b. dx Q(x), f(x) x = 0

(2004 ) 2 (A) (B) (C) 3 (1987) (1988) Shimono and Tachibanaki(1985) (2008) , % 2 (1999) (2005) 3 (2005) (2006) (2008)

,, 23 4 30 (i) (ii) (i) (ii) Negishi (1960) 2010 (2010) ( ) ( ) (2010) E-mail:fujii@econ.kobe-u.ac.jp E-mail:082e527e@stu.kobe-u.ac.jp E-mail:iritani@econ.kobe-u.ac.jp 1 1 16 (2004 ) 2 (A) (B) (C) 3 (1987)

ssp2_fixed.dvi

13 12 30 2 1 3 1.1... 3 1.2... 4 1.3 Bravais... 4 1.4 Miller... 4 2 X 5 2.1 Bragg... 5 2.2... 5 2.3... 7 3 Brillouin 13 3.1... 13 3.2 Brillouin... 13 3.3 Brillouin... 14 3.4 Bloch... 16 3.5 Bloch... 17

D-brane K 1, 2 ( ) 1 K D-brane K K D-brane Witten [1] D-brane K K K K D-brane D-brane K RR BPS D-brane

D-brane K 1, 2 E-mail: sugimoto@yukawa.kyoto-u.ac.jp (2004 12 16 ) 1 K D-brane K K D-brane Witten [1] D-brane K K K K D-brane D-brane K RR BPS D-brane D-brane RR D-brane K D-brane K D-brane K K [2, 3]

Donaldson Seiberg-Witten [GNY] f U U C 1 f(z)dz = Res f(a) 2πi C a U U α = f(z)dz dα = 0 U f U U P 1 α 0 a P 1 Res a α = 0. P 1 Donaldson Seib

( ) Donaldson Seiberg-Witten Witten Göttsche [GNY] L. Göttsche, H. Nakajima and K. Yoshioka, Donaldson = Seiberg-Witten from Mochizuki s formula and instanton counting, Publ. of RIMS, to appear Donaldson

sequentially Cohen Macaulay Herzog Cohen Macaulay 5 unmixed semi-unmixed 2 Semi-unmixed Semi-unmixed G V V (G) V G V G e (G) G F(G) (G) F(G) G dim G G

Semi-unmixed 1 K S K n K[X 1,..., X n ] G G G 2 G V (G) E(G) S G V (G) = {1,..., n} I(G) G S square-free I(G) = (X i X j {i, j} E(G)) I(G) G (edge ideal) 1990 Villarreal [11] S/I(G) Cohen Macaulay G 2005

コホモロジー的AGT対応とK群類似

AGT K ( ) Encounter with Mathematics October 29, 2016 AGT L. F. Alday, D. Gaiotto, Y. Tachikawa, Liouville Correlation Functions from Four-dimensional Gauge Theories, Lett. Math. Phys. 91 (2010), arxiv:0906.3219.

Siegel modular forms of middle parahoric subgroups and Ihara lift ( Tomoyoshi Ibukiyama Osaka University 1. Introduction [8] Ihara Sp(2, R) p

Siegel modular forms of middle parahoric subgroups and Ihara lift ( Tomoyoshi Ibukiyama Osaka University 1. Introduction [8] Ihara 80 1963 Sp(2, R) p L holomorphic discrete series Eichler Brandt Eichler

[Oc, Proposition 2.1, Theorem 2.4] K X (a) l (b) l (a) (b) X [M3] Huber adic 1 Huber ([Hu1], [Hu2], [Hu3]) adic 1.1 adic A I I A {I n } 0 adic 2

On the action of the Weil group on the l-adic cohomology of rigid spaces over local fields (Yoichi Mieda) Graduate School of Mathematical Sciences, The University of Tokyo 0 l Galois K F F q l q K, F K,

1 = = = (set) (element) a A a A a A a A a A {2, 5, (0, 1)}, [ 1, 1] = {x; 1 x 1}. (proposition) A = {x; P (x)} P (x) x x a A a A Remark. (i) {2, 0, 0,

2005 4 1 1 2 2 6 3 8 4 11 5 14 6 18 7 20 8 22 9 24 10 26 11 27 http://matcmadison.edu/alehnen/weblogic/logset.htm 1 1 = = = (set) (element) a A a A a A a A a A {2, 5, (0, 1)}, [ 1, 1] = {x; 1 x 1}. (proposition)

Macdonald, ,,, Macdonald. Macdonald,,,,,.,, Gauss,,.,, Lauricella A, B, C, D, Gelfand, A,., Heckman Opdam.,,,.,,., intersection,. Macdona

Macdonald, 2015.9.1 9.2.,,, Macdonald. Macdonald,,,,,.,, Gauss,,.,, Lauricella A, B, C, D, Gelfand, A,., Heckman Opdam.,,,.,,., intersection,. Macdonald,, q., Heckman Opdam q,, Macdonald., 1 ,,. Macdonald,

62 Serre Abel-Jacob Serre Jacob Jacob Jacob k Jacob Jac(X) X g X (g) X (g) Zarsk [Wel] [Ml] [BLR] [Ser] Jacob ( ) 2 Jacob Pcard 2.1 X g ( C ) X n P P

15, pp.61-80 Abel-Jacob I 1 Introducton Remann Abel-Jacob X g Remann X ω 1,..., ω g Λ = {( γ ω 1,..., γ ω g) C g γ H 1 (X, Z)} Λ C g lattce Jac(X) = C g /Λ Le Abel-Jacob (Theorem 2.2, 4.2) Jac(X) Pcard

Gelfand 3 L 2 () ix M : ϕ(x) ixϕ(x) M : σ(m) = i (λ M) λ (L 2 () ) ( 0 ) L 2 () ϕ, ψ L 2 () ((λ M) ϕ, ψ) ((λ M) ϕ, ψ) = λ ix ϕ(x)ψ(x)dx. λ /(λ ix) ϕ,

A spectral theory of linear operators on Gelfand triplets MI (Institute of Mathematics for Industry, Kyushu University) (Hayato CHIBA) chiba@imi.kyushu-u.ac.jp Dec 2, 20 du dt = Tu. (.) u X T X X T 0 X

xia2.dvi

Journal of Differential Equations 96 (992), 70-84 Melnikov method and transversal homoclinic points in the restricted three-body problem Zhihong Xia Department of Mathematics, Harvard University Cambridge,

Step 2 O(3) Sym 0 (R 3 ), : a + := λ 1 λ 2 λ 3 a λ 1 λ 2 λ 3. a +. X a +, O(3).X. O(3).X = O(3)/O(3) X, O(3) X. 1.7 Step 3 O(3) Sym 0 (R 3 ),

1 1 1.1,,. 1.1 1.2 O(2) R 2 O(2).p, {0} r > 0. O(3) R 3 O(3).p, {0} r > 0.,, O(n) ( SO(n), O(n) ): Sym 0 (R n ) := {X M(n, R) t X = X, tr(x) = 0}. 1.3 O(n) Sym 0 (R n ) : g.x := gxg 1 (g O(n), X Sym 0

2018/10/04 IV/ IV 2/12. A, f, g A. (1) D(0 A ) =, D(1 A ) = Spec(A), D(f) D(g) = D(fg). (2) {f l A l Λ} A I D(I) = l Λ D(f l ). (3) I, J A D(I) D(J) =

2018/10/04 IV/ IV 1/12 2018 IV/ IV 10 04 * 1 : ( A 441 ) yanagida[at]math.nagoya-u.ac.jp https://www.math.nagoya-u.ac.jp/~yanagida 1 I: (ring)., A 0 A, 1 A. (ring homomorphism).. 1.1 A (ideal) I, ( ) I

Siegel Hecke 1 Siege Hecke L L Fourier Dirichlet Hecke Euler L Euler Fourier Hecke [Fr] Andrianov [An2] Hecke Satake L van der Geer ([vg]) L [Na1] [Yo

Siegel Hecke 1 Siege Hecke L L Fourier Dirichlet Hecke Euler L Euler Fourier Hecke [Fr] Andrianov [An2] Hecke Satake L van der Geer ([vg]) L [Na1] [Yo] 2 Hecke ( ) 0 1n J n =, Γ = Γ n = Sp(n, Z) = {γ GL(2n,

Date Wed, 20 Jun (JST) From Kuroki Gen Message-Id Subject Part 4

Part 4 2001 6 20 1 2 2 generator 3 3 L 7 4 Manin triple 8 5 KP Hamiltonian 10 6 n-component KP 12 7 nonlinear Schrödinger Hamiltonian 13 http//wwwmathtohokuacjp/ kuroki/hyogen/soliton-4txt TEX 2002 1 17

sakigake1.dvi

(Zin ARAI) arai@cris.hokudai.ac.jp http://www.cris.hokudai.ac.jp/arai/ 1 dynamical systems ( mechanics ) dynamical systems 3 G X Ψ:G X X, (g, x) Ψ(g, x) =:Ψ g (x) Ψ id (x) =x, Ψ gh (x) =Ψ h (Ψ g (x)) (

NP 1 ( ) Ehrgott [3] ( ) (Ehrgott [3] ) Ulungu & Teghem [8] Zitzler, Laumanns & Bleuler [11] Papadimitriou & Yannakakis [7] Zaroliagis [10] 2 1

NP 1 ( ) Ehrgott [3] 2 1 1 ( ) (Ehrgott [3] ) Ulungu & Teghem [8] Zitzler, Laumanns & Bleuler [11] Papadimitriou & Yannakakis [7] Zaroliagis [10] 2 1 1 1 Avis & Fukuda [1] 2 NP (Ehrgott [3] ) ( ) 3 NP

2 (March 13, 2010) N Λ a = i,j=1 x i ( d (a) i,j x j ), Λ h = N i,j=1 x i ( d (h) i,j x j ) B a B h B a = N i,j=1 ν i d (a) i,j, B h = x j N i,j=1 ν i

1. A. M. Turing [18] 60 Turing A. Gierer H. Meinhardt [1] : (GM) ) a t = D a a xx µa + ρ (c a2 h + ρ 0 (0 < x < l, t > 0) h t = D h h xx νh + c ρ a 2 (0 < x < l, t > 0) a x = h x = 0 (x = 0, l) a = a(x,

D 24 D D D

5 Paper I.R. 2001 5 Paper HP Paper 5 3 5.1................................................... 3 5.2.................................................... 4 5.3.......................................... 6

CAPELLI (T\^o $\mathrm{r}\mathrm{u}$ UMEDA) MATHEMATICS, KYOTO UNIVERSITY DEPARTMENT $\mathrm{o}\mathrm{p}$ $0$:, Cape i,.,.,,,,.,,,.

1508 2006 1-11 1 CAPELLI (T\^o $\mathrm{r}\mathrm{u}$ UMEDA) MATHEMATICS KYOTO UNIVERSITY DEPARTMENT $\mathrm{o}\mathrm{p}$ $0$: Cape i Capelli 1991 ( ) (1994 ; 1998 ) 100 Capelli Capelli Capelli ( ) (

Feynman Encounter with Mathematics 52, [1] N. Kumano-go, Feynman path integrals as analysis on path space by time slicing approximation. Bull

Feynman Encounter with Mathematics 52, 200 9 [] N. Kumano-go, Feynman path integrals as analysis on path space by time slicing approximation. Bull. Sci. Math. vol. 28 (2004) 97 25. [2] D. Fujiwara and

QCD 1 QCD GeV 2014 QCD 2015 QCD SU(3) QCD A µ g µν QCD 1

QCD 1 QCD GeV 2014 QCD 2015 QCD SU(3) QCD A µ g µν QCD 1 (vierbein) QCD QCD 1 1: QCD QCD Γ ρ µν A µ R σ µνρ F µν g µν A µ Lagrangian gr TrFµν F µν No. Yes. Yes. No. No! Yes! [1] Nash & Sen [2] Riemann

* 1 1 (i) (ii) Brückner-Hartree-Fock (iii) (HF, BCS, HFB) (iv) (TDHF,TDHFB) (RPA) (QRPA) (v) (vi) *

* 1 1 (i) (ii) Brückner-Hartree-Fock (iii) (HF, BCS, HFB) (iv) (TDHF,TDHFB) (RPA) (QRPA) (v) (vi) *1 2004 1 1 ( ) ( ) 1.1 140 MeV 1.2 ( ) ( ) 1.3 2.6 10 8 s 7.6 10 17 s? Λ 2.5 10 10 s 6 10 24 s 1.4 ( m

, CH n. CH n, CP n,,,., CH n,,. RH n ( Cartan )., CH n., RH n CH n,,., RH n, CH n., RH n ( ), CH n ( 1.1 (v), (vi) )., RH n,, CH n,., CH n,. 1.2, CH n

( ), Jürgen Berndt,.,. 1, CH n.,,. 1.1 ([6]). CH n (n 2), : (i) CH k (k = 0,..., n 1) tube. (ii) RH n tube. (iii). (iv) ruled minimal, equidistant. (v) normally homogeneous submanifold F k tube. (vi) normally

I II

I II I I 8 I I 5 I 5 9 I 6 6 I 7 7 I 8 87 I 9 96 I 7 I 8 I 9 I 7 I 95 I 5 I 6 II 7 6 II 8 II 9 59 II 67 II 76 II II 9 II 8 II 5 8 II 6 58 II 7 6 II 8 8 I.., < b, b, c, k, m. k + m + c + c b + k + m log

V(x) m e V 0 cos x π x π V(x) = x < π, x > π V 0 (i) x = 0 (V(x) V 0 (1 x 2 /2)) n n d 2 f dξ 2ξ d f 2 dξ + 2n f = 0 H n (ξ) (ii) H

199 1 1 199 1 1. Vx) m e V cos x π x π Vx) = x < π, x > π V i) x = Vx) V 1 x /)) n n d f dξ ξ d f dξ + n f = H n ξ) ii) H n ξ) = 1) n expξ ) dn dξ n exp ξ )) H n ξ)h m ξ) exp ξ )dξ = π n n!δ n,m x = Vx)

(2) Fisher α (α) α Fisher α ( α) 0 Levi Civita (1) ( 1) e m (e) (m) ([1], [2], [13]) Poincaré e m Poincaré e m Kähler-like 2 Kähler-like

() 10 9 30 1 Fisher α (α) α Fisher α ( α) 0 Levi Civita (1) ( 1) e m (e) (m) ([1], [], [13]) Poincaré e m Poincaré e m Kähler-like Kähler-like Kähler M g M X, Y, Z (.1) Xg(Y, Z) = g( X Y, Z) + g(y, XZ)

category.dvi

1 2 2 3 3 6 4 13 5 15 6 16 7 19 8 24 9 28 1 1 (1.1). [Ka76] [Mac98] (1.2). (1.3). EilenbergMac Lane K K V V = Hom(V K)V VV V V = Hom(Hom(V K) K) η : V V ; x (ϕ x : p p(x)) η : V V V : V W F() : V W ; ϕ

A bound of the number of reduced Arakelov divisors of a number field (joint work with Ryusuke Yoshimitsu) Takao Watanabe Department of Mathematics Osa

A bound of the number of reduced Arakelov divisors of a number field (joint work with Ryusuke Yoshimitsu) Takao Watanabe Department of Mathematics Osaka University , Schoof Algorithmic Number Theory, MSRI

SUSY DWs

@ 2013 1 25 Supersymmetric Domain Walls Eric A. Bergshoeff, Axel Kleinschmidt, and Fabio Riccioni Phys. Rev. D86 (2012) 085043 (arxiv:1206.5697) ( ) Contents 1 2 SUSY Domain Walls Wess-Zumino Embedding

第5章 偏微分方程式の境界値問題

October 5, 2018 1 / 113 4 ( ) 2 / 113 Poisson 5.1 Poisson ( A.7.1) Poisson Poisson 1 (A.6 ) Γ p p N u D Γ D b 5.1.1: = Γ D Γ N 3 / 113 Poisson 5.1.1 d {2, 3} Lipschitz (A.5 ) Γ D Γ N = \ Γ D Γ p Γ N Γ

all.dvi

38 5 Cauchy.,,,,., σ.,, 3,,. 5.1 Cauchy (a) (b) (a) (b) 5.1: 5.1. Cauchy 39 F Q Newton F F F Q F Q 5.2: n n ds df n ( 5.1). df n n df(n) df n, t n. t n = df n (5.1) ds 40 5 Cauchy t l n mds df n 5.3: t

2006年3月8日

18 21 1990 2004 2 2005 14 15 2004 1990 2005 2003 300 7 2 1 2005 1972 100 40 6 1972 2004 197 6,500 2004 21 59 100 65 2007 5 2005 30 1.8 535.89 348.33 187.56 2006 2006 5 1 30 1 30 46 46 1 46 1000kl 4 1 100kl

163 KdV KP Lax pair L, B L L L 1/2 W 1 LW = ( / x W t 1, t 2, t 3, ψ t n ψ/ t n = B nψ (KdV B n = L n/2 KP B n = L n KdV KP Lax W Lax τ KP L ψ τ τ Cha

63 KdV KP Lax pair L, B L L L / W LW / x W t, t, t 3, ψ t n / B nψ KdV B n L n/ KP B n L n KdV KP Lax W Lax τ KP L ψ τ τ Chapter 7 An Introduction to the Sato Theory Masayui OIKAWA, Faculty of Engneering,

( ) (, ) ( )

( ) (, ) ( ) 1 2 2 2 2.1......................... 2 2.2.............................. 3 2.3............................... 4 2.4.............................. 5 2.5.............................. 6 2.6..........................

2 Three-wave Painlevé VI 21 -Wilson three-wave Painlevé VI Gauss -Wilson [KK3] n 3 3 t = t 1 t 2 t 3 -Wilson W z; t := I + W 1 z + W 2 z 2 + z; t := 0

1473 : de nouvelles perspectives 2006 2 pp 102 119 VI q 1 Tetsuya Kikuchi Sabro Kakei Drinfel d-sokolov Painlevé [KK1] [KK2] [KK3] [KIK] [ ] [ ] [KK3] three-wave equation Painlevé VI q q Drinfel d-sokolov

磁性物理学 - 遷移金属化合物磁性のスピンゆらぎ理論

email: takahash@sci.u-hyogo.ac.jp May 14, 2009 Outline 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 2 / 262 Today s Lecture: Mode-mode Coupling Theory 100 / 262 Part I Effects of Non-linear Mode-Mode Coupling Effects of Non-linear

I = [a, b] R γ : I C γ(a) = γ(b) z C \ γ(i) 1(4) γ z winding number index Ind γ (z) = φ(b, z) φ(a, z) φ 1(1) (i)(ii) 1 1 c C \ {0} B(c; c ) L c z B(c;

21 1 http://www.ozawa.phys.waseda.ac.jp/index2.html ( ) 1. I = [a, b] R γ : I C γ γ(i) z 0 C \ γ(i) (1) ε > 0 φ : I B(z 0 ; ε) C (i) B(z 0 ; ε) γ(i) = (ii) (t, z) I B(z 0 ; ε) exp(φ(t, z)) = γ(t) z (2)

~nabe/lecture/index.html 2

2001 12 13 1 http://www.sml.k.u-tokyo.ac.jp/ ~nabe/lecture/index.html nabe@sml.k.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2 1. 10/ 4 2. 10/11 3. 10/18 1 4. 10/25 2 5. 11/ 1 6. 11/ 8 7. 11/15 8. 11/22 9. 11/29 10. 12/ 6 1 11. 12/13

untitled

2次Wiener汎関数について

.. 2 Wiener 213 9 21 2 Wiener 213 9 21 1 / 18 Plan Plan. 1. 2 2 Wiener F-L. 3 2 Wiener. 4 2 Wiener. 5 Wiener 2 Wiener 213 9 21 2 / 18 1979B4 198M1 Dym-McKean: Fourier series and inegrals Sroock-Varadhan:

非可換Lubin-Tate理論の一般化に向けて

Lubin-Tate 2012 9 18 ( ) Lubin-Tate 2012 9 18 1 / 27 ( ) Lubin-Tate 2012 9 18 2 / 27 Lubin-Tate p 1 1 ( ) Lubin-Tate 2012 9 18 2 / 27 Lubin-Tate p 1 1 Lubin-Tate GL n n 1 Lubin-Tate ( ) Lubin-Tate 2012

Gauss Fuchs rigid rigid rigid Nicholas Katz Rigid local systems [6] Fuchs Katz Crawley- Boevey[1] [7] Katz rigid rigid Katz middle convolu

rigidity 2014.9.1-2014.9.2 Fuchs 1 Introduction y + p(x)y + q(x)y = 0, y 2 p(x), q(x) p(x) q(x) Fuchs 19 Fuchs 83 Gauss Fuchs rigid rigid rigid 7 1970 1996 Nicholas Katz Rigid local systems [6] Fuchs Katz

1. R n Ω ε G ε 0 Ω ε B n 2 Ωε = with Bu = 0 on Ω ε i=1 x 2 i ε +0 B Bu = u (Dirichlet, D Ω ε ), Bu = u ν (Neumann, N Ω ε ), Ω ε G ( ) / 25

.. IV 2012 10 4 ( ) 2012 10 4 1 / 25 1. R n Ω ε G ε 0 Ω ε B n 2 Ωε = with Bu = 0 on Ω ε i=1 x 2 i ε +0 B Bu = u (Dirichlet, D Ω ε ), Bu = u ν (Neumann, N Ω ε ), Ω ε G ( ) 2012 10 4 2 / 25 1. Ω ε B ε t

1 M = (M, g) m Riemann N = (N, h) n Riemann M N C f : M N f df : T M T N M T M f N T N M f 1 T N T M f 1 T N C X, Y Γ(T M) M C T M f 1 T N M Levi-Civi

1 Surveys in Geometry 1980 2 6, 7 Harmonic Map Plateau Eells-Sampson [5] Siu [19, 20] Kähler 6 Reports on Global Analysis [15] Sacks- Uhlenbeck [18] Siu-Yau [21] Frankel Siu Yau Frankel [13] 1 Surveys

(1) (2) (3) (4) 1

8 3 4 3.................................... 3........................ 6.3 B [, ].......................... 8.4........................... 9........................................... 9.................................

Introduction SFT Tachyon condensation in SFT SFT ( ) at 1 / 38

( ) 2011 5 14 at 1 / 38 Introduction? = String Field Theory = SFT 2 / 38 String Field : ϕ(x, t) x ϕ x / ( ) X ( σ) (string field): Φ[X(σ), t] X(σ) Φ (Φ X(σ) ) X(σ) & / 3 / 38 SFT with Lorentz & Gauge Invariance

Auerbach and Kotlikoff(1987) (1987) (1988) 4 (2004) 5 Diamond(1965) Auerbach and Kotlikoff(1987) 1 ( ) ,

,, 2010 8 24 2010 9 14 A B C A (B Negishi(1960) (C) ( 22 3 27 ) E-mail:fujii@econ.kobe-u.ac.jp E-mail:082e527e@stu.kobe-u.ac.jp E-mail:iritani@econ.kobe-u.ac.jp 1 1 1 2 3 Auerbach and Kotlikoff(1987) (1987)

A = A x x + A y y + A, B = B x x + B y y + B, C = C x x + C y y + C..6 x y A B C = A x x + A y y + A B x B y B C x C y C { B = A x x + A y y + A y B B

9 7 A = A x x + A y y + A, B = B x x + B y y + B, C = C x x + C y y + C..6 x y A B C = A x x + A y y + A B x B y B C x C y C { B = A x x + A y y + A y B B x x B } B C y C y + x B y C x C C x C y B = A

24 I ( ) 1. R 3 (i) C : x 2 + y 2 1 = 0 (ii) C : y = ± 1 x 2 ( 1 x 1) (iii) C : x = cos t, y = sin t (0 t 2π) 1.1. γ : [a, b] R n ; t γ(t) = (x

24 I 1.1.. ( ) 1. R 3 (i) C : x 2 + y 2 1 = 0 (ii) C : y = ± 1 x 2 ( 1 x 1) (iii) C : x = cos t, y = sin t (0 t 2π) 1.1. γ : [a, b] R n ; t γ(t) = (x 1 (t), x 2 (t),, x n (t)) ( ) ( ), γ : (i) x 1 (t),

Hilbert, von Neuman [1, p.86] kt 2 1 [1, 2] 2 2

hara@math.kyushu-u.ac.jp 1 1 1.1............................................... 2 1.2............................................. 3 2 3 3 5 3.1............................................. 6 3.2...................................

Kullback-Leibler

Kullback-Leibler 206 6 6 http://www.math.tohoku.ac.jp/~kuroki/latex/206066kullbackleibler.pdf 0 2 Kullback-Leibler 3. q i.......................... 3.2........... 3.3 Kullback-Leibler.............. 4.4

320_…X…e†Q“õ‹øfiÁ’F

I? 3 1 3 1.1?................................. 3 1.2?............................... 3 1.3!................................... 3 2 4 2.1........................................ 4 2.2.......................................

II III I ~ 2 ~

中堅中小企業向け秘密保持マニュアル

20 15 14.6 15.3 14.9 15.7 16.0 15.7 13.4 14.5 13.7 14.2 10 10 13 16 19 22 1 70,000 60,000 50,000 40,000 30,000 20,000 10,000 0 2,500 59,862 56,384 2,000 42,662 44,211 40,639 37,323 1,500 33,408 34,472

ＰＲ映画-1

- 2 -

- 2 - - 3 - (1) (2) (3) (1) - 4 - ~ - 5 - (2) - 6 - (1) (1) - 7 - - 8 - (i) (ii) (iii) (ii) (iii) (ii) 10 - 9 - (3) - 10 - (3) - 11 - - 12 - (1) - 13 - - 14 - (2) - 15 - - 16 - (3) - 17 - - 18 - (4) -

2 1980 8 4 4 4 4 4 3 4 2 4 4 2 4 6 0 0 6 4 2 4 1 2 2 1 4 4 4 2 3 3 3 4 3 4 4 4 4 2 5 5 2 4 4 4 0 3 3 0 9 10 10 9 1 1

1 1979 6 24 3 4 4 4 4 3 4 4 2 3 4 4 6 0 0 6 2 4 4 4 3 0 0 3 3 3 4 3 2 4 3? 4 3 4 3 4 4 4 4 3 3 4 4 4 4 2 1 1 2 15 4 4 15 0 1 2 1980 8 4 4 4 4 4 3 4 2 4 4 2 4 6 0 0 6 4 2 4 1 2 2 1 4 4 4 2 3 3 3 4 3 4 4

1 (1) (2)

1 2 (1) (2) (3) 3-78 - 1 (1) (2) - 79 - i) ii) iii) (3) (4) (5) (6) - 80 - (7) (8) (9) (10) 2 (1) (2) (3) (4) i) - 81 - ii) (a) (b) 3 (1) (2) - 82 - - 83 - - 84 - - 85 - - 86 - (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6)

4/15 No.

4/15 No. 1 4/15 No. 4/15 No. 3 Particle of mass m moving in a potential V(r) V(r) m i ψ t = m ψ(r,t)+v(r)ψ(r,t) ψ(r,t) = ϕ(r)e iωt ψ(r,t) Wave function steady state m ϕ(r)+v(r)ϕ(r) = εϕ(r) Eigenvalue problem

compact compact Hermann compact Hermite ( - ) Hermann Hermann ( ) compact Hermite Lagrange compact Hermite ( ) a, Σ a {0} a 3 1

014 5 4 compact compact Hermann compact Hermite ( - ) Hermann Hermann ( ) compact Hermite Lagrange compact Hermite ( ) 1 1.1. a, Σ a {0} a 3 1 (1) a = span(σ). () α, β Σ s α β := β α,β α α Σ. (3) α, β

u Θ u u u ( λ + ) v Θ v v v ( λ + ) (.) Θ ( λ + ) (.) u + + v (.),, S ( λ + ) uv,, S uv, SH (.8) (.8) S S (.9),

ML rgr ML ML ML (,, ) σ τ τ u + + τ σ τ v + + τ τ σ + + (.) uv,,,, σ, σ, σ, τ, τ, τ t (Hook) σ λθ + ε, τ γ σ λθ + ε, τ γ σ λθ + ε, τ γ λ, E ν ν λ E, E ( + ν)( ν) ( + ν) Θ Θ ε + ε + ε (.) ε, ε, ε, γ, γ,

Shunsuke Kobayashi 1 [6] [11] [7] u t = D 2 u 1 x 2 + f(u, v) + s L u(t, x)dx, L x (0.L), t > 0, Neumann 0 v t = D 2 v 2 + g(u, v), x (0, L), t > 0. x

Shunsuke Kobayashi [6] [] [7] u t = D 2 u x 2 + fu, v + s L ut, xdx, L x 0.L, t > 0, Neumann 0 v t = D 2 v 2 + gu, v, x 0, L, t > 0. x2 u u v t, 0 = t, L = 0, x x. v t, 0 = t, L = 0.2 x x ut, x R vt, x

02-量子力学の復習

4/17 No. 1 4/17 No. 2 4/17 No. 3 Particle of mass m moving in a potential V(r) V(r) m i ψ t = 2 2m 2 ψ(r,t)+v(r)ψ(r,t) ψ(r,t) Wave function ψ(r,t) = ϕ(r)e iωt steady state 2 2m 2 ϕ(r)+v(r)ϕ(r) = εϕ(r)

March 4, R R R- R R

March 4, 2016 1. R- 2 1.1. R- 2 1.2. R- R- 4 1.3. R- 5 2. 6 2.1. 6 2.2. 6 2.3. 6 2.4. 7 3. 8 3.1. 8 3.2. 8 4. 10 4.1. 10 4.2. 10 4.3. 10 5. 12 5.1. 12 5.2. 14 6. Hom 14 6.1. Hom 14 6.2. Hom 15 6.3. Hom