Microsoft Word - Šv”|“Å‘I.DOC

Similar documents
遺産相続、学歴及び退職金の決定要因に関する実証分析 『家族関係、就労、退職金及び教育・資産の世代間移転に関する世帯アンケート調査』

橡同居選択における所得の影響(DP原稿).PDF

untitled

日本の高齢者世帯の貯蓄行動に関する実証分析


わが国企業による資金調達方法の選択問題

,.,,.,. NIRA,.,.,,, GDP.,., 1%, 2.0% 3).,,.,,., 1, 4).,,.,, GDP,.,,.,,,.,,., 2002.,,., 3), Q&A Q16 (

高齢化とマクロ投資比率―国際パネルデータを用いた分析―


Auerbach and Kotlikoff(1987) (1987) (1988) 4 (2004) 5 Diamond(1965) Auerbach and Kotlikoff(1987) 1 ( ) ,

Winter 図 1 図 OECD OECD OECD OECD 2003

アジアの資本移動の変化に関するクラスター分析 アジア域内の証券投資活性化に向けて

shuron.dvi

産業・企業レベルデータで見た日本の経済成長.pdf

60 Vol. 44 No. 1 2 準市場 化の制度的枠組み: 英国 教育改革法 1988 の例 Education Reform Act a School Performance Tables LEA 4 LEA LEA 3

自殺の経済社会的要因に関する調査研究報告書

財政赤字の経済分析:中長期的視点からの考察

財政赤字の経済分析:中長期的視点からの考察

_16_.indd

Stepwise Chow Test * Chow Test Chow Test Stepwise Chow Test Stepwise Chow Test Stepwise Chow Test Riddell Riddell first step second step sub-step Step

「産業上利用することができる発明」の審査の運用指針(案)

ito.dvi

2 / 24

GDPギャップと潜在成長率

Masahiro NAKANO Keynes benchmark Keynes 89

株式保有構成と企業価値 ─コーポレート・ガバナンスに関する一考察─

表紙_目次.PDF

OSIPP41_p1_2.eps

LA-VAR Toda- Yamamoto(1995) VAR (Lag Augmented vector autoregressive model LA-VAR ) 2 2 Nordhaus(1975) 3 1 (D2)

PowerPoint プレゼンテーション

toukei11.dvi

1 Nelson-Siegel Nelson and Siegel(1987) 3 Nelson-Siegel 3 Nelson-Siegel 2 3 Nelson-Siegel 2 Nelson-Siegel Litterman and Scheinkman(199

橡motonishi.PDF


開発金融増刊号

生活設計レジメ

44 4 I (1) ( ) (10 15 ) ( 17 ) ( 3 1 ) (2)

I II III 28 29


Microsoft Word - KUES-DP docx

Microsoft Word - KUES-DP docx

CONTENTS N T

(2004 ) 2 (A) (B) (C) 3 (1987) (1988) Shimono and Tachibanaki(1985) (2008) , % 2 (1999) (2005) 3 (2005) (2006) (2008)

2015 : (heterogenous) Heterogeneous homogeneous Heterogenous agent model Bewley 1 (The Overlapping-Generations Models:OLG) OLG OLG Allais (1

中国の家計所得と消費構造に関する分析

デフレ不況下の金融政策をめぐる政治過程

アロー『やってみて学習』から学習:経済成長にとっての教訓 Learning from `Learning by Doing': Lessons for Economic Growth

【表紙】経済学論叢_18号/表1・3・背

C. R. McKenzie ( 38 ) (Keio Household Panel Survey) control group treatment group 1


OECD Benartzi and Thaler Brown et al. Mottla and Utkus Rooiji et al. Atkinson et al. MacFarland et al. Elton et al. Tang et al. Benartzi and Thaler Br

Transcription:

90 ª ª * E-mailshinobu.nakagawa@boj.or.jp i

ii

iii

iv

SNA 1 70 80 2 80 90 80 80 90 1 80 90 98 6 1 1 SNA 2 1 SNA 80 1SNA 1 19931998 1

2-190 1,2 2 2-2 2-3,4 3 2-5 4 2030 2-3 3 2-15 97 20 90 2-15 9198 1. 1 2 3 5 4 2. 3. 30 20 40 50 60 4. 60 20 50 30 40 5. 9798 1. 3 2 4 1 5 2. 3. 30 40 50 60 20 5. 9197 2 5 15 98 1 494 2 494646 3 646808 4 8081047 5 1047 3 4 1 2

5 1 1 1 2-1 98 6 * c = a 1 * income + a 2 * age + a * c = 0(c < g 1 ) * c = 1( g 1 c < g 2 ) * c = 2( g < c ) 2 3 * hom e + a 4 * area c 97 98 012 income 60 5000 age 20 30 40 50 6064 6569 70 7 home 01 area 12 4 3 2 4 4 1 2 5 1 6 97 98 a 1 5 6 3 1 2 7 25 35 45 55 62.5 67.5 72.5 3

a 2 a 3,a 4 8 9798 1 a 1 a 2 a 3 a 4 1 2 Pseudo-R 2 0.0003 (4.37) <0.00> -0.0124 (-7.58) <0.00> 0.0045 (0.09) <0.93> 0.0065 (0.61) <0.54> -1.1574 (-12.40) <0.00> 0.2534 (2.76) <0.01> 0.013 3415 z t p 5% 99 c 98 99 012 a 4 9 9899 2 a 1 a 2 a 3 a 4 1 2 Pseudo-R 2 0.0001-0.0039-0.0266-0.0288-0.5634 1.0731 (1.42) (-2.30) (-0.53) (-2.60) (-5.97) (11.27) 0.003 <0.16> <0.02> <0.60> <0.01> <0.00> <0.00> 8 2-1 2 98 5 9 4

90 3-1 90 98 6 10 3-280 90 11 10 500 50 400 50 600 500 11 93 95 5,000 5

s = b + b * r + b * yf + b it i 0 i1 t i 2 it i3 * risk it s i i r 12 CPI yf i i 3-1 risk i i 3-2 i= 3 adjr 2 6169 b 3 13 b 1 b 0 3 < 1 > < 3 > < 5 > b 0 b 1 b 2 b 3 AR1 adjr 2 S.E./B-G 9.79 0.10 0.07 0.29 0.65 0.69 1.79 (2.00) (0.97) (0.68) (2.86) (7.80) 0.447 17.87-0.07 0.07 0.44 0.62 0.61 1.77 (3.56) (-0.66) (0.66) (4.18) (7.12) 0.013 28.81-0.23-0.01 0.11 0.72 0.63 1.80 (5.64) (-2.37) (-0.14) (1.66) (10.86) 0.012 1 76/298/4Q t S.E. 1% B-G Breusch-Godfrey p H 0 1 2 p 1 12 13 76/298/4Q 37.743.5 39.245.9 46.451.4 6

3-1 1 2 5 1 848994 500 14 4 94 50 2 98 500 15 16 1 5-1 1 5-25060 50 500 90 6-1 17 90 4060 6-290 14 94 1 487 15 98 1 494 16 17 6 7

6-3 2-3 90 2030 7-1 20 34 7-2 7-32030 2-3,4 90 8-180 8-290 18 80 18 1994 89 8

1 9-1 6064 65 60 65 9-2(1) 19 10-1 10-2 97 65 11-1 60 20 65 11-260 1 1073 70 742 1994 Hayashi, Ando and Ferris1988 89 94 8-2 1015 19 9-2(2) 20 9

1 12-1 60 70 6 21 2040 12-2(1) 22 1 Horioka1993 Hayashi1998 23 24 12-2(1),(2) 21 22 23 Altonji, Hayashi and Kotlikoff1992Hayashi, Altonji and Kotlikoff1996Hayashi1995 24 Bernheim, Shleifer and Summers1985 strategic bequest motive 10

12-2(3) 60 2 strategic bequest motive 2 7-3 12-1 13-1 25 13-2(1) 13-2(2) 1 2,600 13-2(3) 26 25 4 26 11

90 3 3 80 90 90 50 60 14-1 2-3 27 9-2(2) accidental bequest transitory income Abel1985 27 14-2 60 14-3 12

28 12 PR 15 300400 16 HUD HUD-HECMHome Equity Conversion Mortgage89 97/1 18,000 28 13 13

ordered probit model Y i 01 2 3 Y i Y * i latent variable * Yi = a1 + a 2X i + ei (1) 29 X i Y i (1)X i * i Y i * ì0 Yi g1 ï * Y i = í1 if g1 < Yi g 2 (2) ï * î2 g < Y 2 i (2) 1 2 0 1 2 (1) a 1 a 2 (1) i 30 F() - i =a 1 +a 2 X i -Y * i Y i =0,1,2 Pr(Yi = 0;X i,a, g) = 1- F(a1 + a 2Xi - g1) Pr(Yi = 1;X i,a, g) = F(a1 + a 2Xi - g1) - F(a1 + a 2Xi - g 2 ) (3) Pr(Y = 2;X,a, g) = F(a + a X - g ) i i 1 2 i 2 29 1 30 i ordered logit model 14

(3) 4 a 1,a 2, 1, 2 Y i log likelihood function, LLF LLF(a, g) = log Õ Yi = 0 Pr(Y = 0;X,a, g) + log i i Õ Yi = 1 Pr(Y = 1;X,a, g) + logõ Pr(Yi = 2;X i,a, g) (4) Y i = 2 4 (4) LLF i i 15

Abel, A. B.1985, Precautionary Saving and Accidental Bequests, American Economic Review, Vol.75. Altonji, J., Hayashi, F. and Kotlikoff, L.1992, Is the Extended Family Altruistically Linked? Direct Tests Using Micro Data, American Economic Review, Vol.82. Altonji, J., Hayashi, F. and Kotlikoff, L.1995, Parental Altruism and Inter Vivos Transfers: Theory and Evidence, NBER Working Paper 5378. Banks, J., Blundell, R. and Tanner, S.1998, Is There a Retirement-Savings Puzzle?, American Economic Review, Vol.88. Barro, R. J. and Friedman, J. W.1977, On Uncertain Lifetimes, Journal of Political Economy, Vol.85. Bernheim, B. D., Shleifer, A. and Summers, L. H.1985, The Strategic Bequest Motive, Journal of Political Economy, Vol.93. Carlson, J. A. and Parkin, M.1975, Inflation Expectation, Economica 42. Carroll, C. D. and Samwick, A. A.1998, How Important is Precautionary Saving?, Review of Economics and Statistics, Vol.LXXX. Hayashi, F.1986, Why Is Japan s Saving Rate So Apparently High?, in S. Fischer, ed., Macroeconomics Annual, Vol. 1, National Bureau of Economic Research. Hayashi, F., Ando, A. and Ferris, R.1988, Life Cycle and Bequest Savings, Journal of the Japanese and International Economies, 2. Hayashi, F.1995, Is the Japanese Extended Family Altruistically Linked? A Test Based on Engel Curves, Journal of Political Economy, Vol.103. Hayashi, F., Altonji, J. and Kotlikoff, L.1996, Risk-sharing between and within Families, Econometrica, Vol.64. Hayashi, F.1998, Understanding Saving, MIT Press. Higgins, M.1998, Demography, National Savings and International Capital Flows, International Economic Review, Vol.39, No.2. Horioka, C. Y.1984, The Applicability of the Life-Cycle Hypothesis of Saving to Japan, The Kyoto University Economic Review, 54, No.2. Horioka, C. Y.1989, Why Is Japan s Private Saving Rate So high?, In Ryuzo Sato and Takashi Negishi (eds.), Developments in Japanese Economics. Tokyo : Academic Press / Harcourt Brace Jovanovich Japan, Inc.. Horioka, C. Y.1993, Saving in Japan, in Heertje, A., eds., World Savings, Blackwell Publishers, UK / USA. 1998 10 10 7 1998 6 1993 12 2 1994 No.27 16

96 () () () () 81/4 1 65 90/4 70 92/10 65 91/7 1 65 94/3 1 65 96/12 94 87/12 60 2 87/1 60 1 84/3 65 1 84/4 70 70 1 85/2 70 2 85/4 65 2 89/2 65 1 2 89/4 60 1 98