h(n) x(n) s(n) S (ω) = H(ω)X(ω) (5 1) H(ω) H(ω) = F[h(n)] (5 2) F X(ω) x(n) X(ω) = F[x(n)] (5 3) S (ω) s(n) S (ω) = F[s(n)] (5

Similar documents
pp d 2 * Hz Hz 3 10 db Wind-induced noise, Noise reduction, Microphone array, Beamforming 1

2007/8 Vol. J90 D No. 8 Stauffer [7] 2 2 I 1 I 2 2 (I 1(x),I 2(x)) 2 [13] I 2 = CI 1 (C >0) (I 1,I 2) (I 1,I 2) Field Monitoring Server

4 4 2 RAW (PCA) RAW RAW [5] 4 RAW 4 Park [12] Park 2 RAW RAW 2 RAW y = Mx + n. (1) y RAW x RGB M CFA n.. R G B σr 2, σ2 G, σ2 B D n ( )

2 DS SS (SS+DS) Fig. 2 Separation algorithm for motorcycle sound by combining DS and SS (SS+DS). 3. [3] DS SS 2 SS+DS 1 1 B SS SS 4. NMF 4. 1 (NMF) Y

(a) (b) (c) Canny (d) 1 ( x α, y α ) 3 (x α, y α ) (a) A 2 + B 2 + C 2 + D 2 + E 2 + F 2 = 1 (3) u ξ α u (A, B, C, D, E, F ) (4) ξ α (x 2 α, 2x α y α,

H(ω) = ( G H (ω)g(ω) ) 1 G H (ω) (6) 2 H 11 (ω) H 1N (ω) H(ω)= (2) H M1 (ω) H MN (ω) [ X(ω)= X 1 (ω) X 2 (ω) X N (ω) ] T (3)

2005 1

, [g/cm 3 ] [m/s] 1 6 [kg m 2 s 1 ] ,58 1, ,56 1, , ,58 1,

1 Kinect for Windows M = [X Y Z] T M = [X Y Z ] T f (u,v) w 3.2 [11] [7] u = f X +u Z 0 δ u (X,Y,Z ) (5) v = f Y Z +v 0 δ v (X,Y,Z ) (6) w = Z +

10_08.dvi

(DFT) 009 DFT: Discrete Fourier Transform N x[n] DFT N 1 X[k] = x[n]wn kn, k = 0, 1,, N 1 (6 ) n=0 1) W N = e j π N W N twidd

renshumondai-kaito.dvi

Kalman ( ) 1) (Kalman filter) ( ) t y 0,, y t x ˆx 3) 10) t x Y [y 0,, y ] ) x ( > ) ˆx (prediction) ) x ( ) ˆx (filtering) )

ii 3.,. 4. F. (), ,,. 8.,. 1. (75%) (25%) =7 20, =7 21 (. ). 1.,, (). 3.,. 1. ().,.,.,.,.,. () (12 )., (), 0. 2., 1., 0,.

³ÎΨÏÀ

xx/xx Vol. Jxx A No. xx 1 Fig. 1 PAL(Panoramic Annular Lens) PAL(Panoramic Annular Lens) PAL (2) PAL PAL 2 PAL 3 2 PAL 1 PAL 3 PAL PAL 2. 1 PAL

第90回日本感染症学会学術講演会抄録(I)

Ł\”ƒ-2005

微分積分 サンプルページ この本の定価 判型などは, 以下の URL からご覧いただけます. このサンプルページの内容は, 初版 1 刷発行時のものです.

JIS Z803: (substitution method) 3 LCR LCR GPIB

読めば必ずわかる 分散分析の基礎 第2版

ばらつき抑制のための確率最適制御

main.dvi

22 / ( ) OD (Origin-Destination)

waseda2010a-jukaiki1-main.dvi

O1-1 O1-2 O1-3 O1-4 O1-5 O1-6

On the Limited Sample Effect of the Optimum Classifier by Bayesian Approach he Case of Independent Sample Size for Each Class Xuexian HA, etsushi WAKA

V 0 = + r pv (H) + qv (T ) = + r ps (H) + qs (T ) = S 0 X n+ (T ) = n S n+ (T ) + ( + r)(x n n S n ) = ( + r)x n + n (d r)s n = ( + r)v n + V n+(h) V

untitled

カルマンフィルターによるベータ推定( )

ii 3.,. 4. F. (), ,,. 8.,. 1. (75% ) (25% ) =9 7, =9 8 (. ). 1.,, (). 3.,. 1. ( ).,.,.,.,.,. ( ) (1 2 )., ( ), 0. 2., 1., 0,.


() n C + n C + n C + + n C n n (3) n C + n C + n C 4 + n C + n C 3 + n C 5 + (5) (6 ) n C + nc + 3 nc n nc n (7 ) n C + nc + 3 nc n nc n (

日歯雑誌(H19・5月号)済/P6‐16 クリニカル  柿木 5


& 3 3 ' ' (., (Pixel), (Light Intensity) (Random Variable). (Joint Probability). V., V = {,,, V }. i x i x = (x, x,, x V ) T. x i i (State Variable),

AC Modeling and Control of AC Motors Seiji Kondo, Member 1. q q (1) PM (a) N d q Dept. of E&E, Nagaoka Unive

IPSJ SIG Technical Report Vol.2015-MUS-107 No /5/23 HARK-Binaural Raspberry Pi 2 1,a) ( ) HARK 2 HARK-Binaural A/D Raspberry Pi 2 1.

Part () () Γ Part ,

seminar0220a.dvi

特許侵害訴訟における無効の主張を認めた判決─半導体装置事件−

2 1,2, , 2 ( ) (1) (2) (3) (4) Cameron and Trivedi(1998) , (1987) (1982) Agresti(2003)


sumi.indd

solutionJIS.dvi

7 π L int = gψ(x)ψ(x)φ(x) + (7.4) [ ] p ψ N = n (7.5) π (π +,π 0,π ) ψ (σ, σ, σ )ψ ( A) σ τ ( L int = gψψφ g N τ ) N π * ) (7.6) π π = (π, π, π ) π ±

L P y P y + ɛ, ɛ y P y I P y,, y P y + I P y, 3 ŷ β 0 β y β 0 β y β β 0, β y x x, x,, x, y y, y,, y x x y y x x, y y, x x y y {}}{,,, / / L P / / y, P

(2004 ) 2 (A) (B) (C) 3 (1987) (1988) Shimono and Tachibanaki(1985) (2008) , % 2 (1999) (2005) 3 (2005) (2006) (2008)

2_05.dvi

Sample function Re random process Flutter, Galloping, etc. ensemble (mean value) N 1 µ = lim xk( t1) N k = 1 N autocorrelation function N 1 R( t1, t1

( )/2 hara/lectures/lectures-j.html 2, {H} {T } S = {H, T } {(H, H), (H, T )} {(H, T ), (T, T )} {(H, H), (T, T )} {1

Transcription:

1 -- 5 5 2011 2 1940 N. Wiener FFT 5-1 5-2 Norbert Wiener 1894 1912 MIT c 2011 1/(12)

1 -- 5 -- 5 5--1 2008 3 h(n) x(n) s(n) S (ω) = H(ω)X(ω) (5 1) H(ω) H(ω) = F[h(n)] (5 2) F X(ω) x(n) X(ω) = F[x(n)] (5 3) S (ω) s(n) S (ω) = F[s(n)] (5 4) (5 1) S (ω) Ŝ (ω) E(ω) = S (ω) Ŝ (ω) = S (ω) H(ω)X(ω) (5 5) E[ E(ω) 2 ] = E[ S (ω) H(ω)X(ω) 2 ] (5 6) E[ ] (5 6) H(ω) E[ (ω) 2 ] H(ω) = 2H(ω)P XX (ω) 2P XS (ω) (5 7) P XX (ω) P XS (ω) P XX (ω) = E[ X(ω) 2 ] (5 8) P XS (ω) = E[X(ω)S (ω)] (5 9) P XX (ω) c 2011 2/(12)

P X S (ω) (5 7) 0 (5 6) H(ω) (5 7) 2H(ω)P XX (ω) 2P XS (ω) = 0 (5 10) H(ω) = P XS (ω) P XX (ω) (5 11) (5 11) X(ω) S (ω) W(ω) = F[w(n)] (5 12) S (ω) X(ω) P XX (ω) = P S S (ω) + P WW (ω) (5 13) X(ω) S (ω) P XS = E[(S (ω) + W(ω))S (ω)] = E[ S (ω) 2 ] = P S S (ω) (5 14) S (ω) (5 13) (5 14) (5 11) H(ω) = P S S (ω) P S S (ω) + P WW (ω) (5 15) (5 15) 2) [ ] (5 15) ˆP S S (ω) = S (ω) 2 (5 16) ( ) c 2011 3/(12)

ˆP WW (ω) = W(ω) 2 (5 17) (5 16)(5 17) (5 15) S (ω) H(ω) = 2 (5 18) S (ω) 2 + W(ω) 2 (5 18) S (ω) 2 S (ω) 2 X(ω) 2 (5 19) 3) 1) S (ω) 2 2) S (ω) 2 = X(ω) 2 W(ω) 2 (5 20) W(ω) 2 X(ω) 2 (5 20) (5 18) H(ω) = X(ω) 2 W(ω) 2 X(ω) 2 (5 21) Spectral Subtraction : SS SS 5 1 3.4kHz 10kHz 3.4kHz 10kHz 51.2ms 1/2 SS X(ω) (5 1) H(ω) S (ω) (5 21) c 2011 4/(12)

H(ω) = X(ω) 2 W(ω) 2 X(ω) 2 (5 22) (5 22) X(ω) 2 < W(ω) 2 (5 23) 0 H(ω) 1 (5 24) (5 22) H(ω) H R (ω) = H(ω) + H(ω) 2 (5 25) (5 23) 0 5 1 SS 5 1 SS c 2011 5/(12)

1) S.F. Boll, Suppression of Acoustic Noise in Speech Using Spectral Subtraction, IEEE Trans. Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing, vol.assp-27, no.7, pp.113-120, 1979. 2) S.V. Vaseghi, Advanced Digital Signal Processing and Noise Reduction, Second Edition, Wiley, 2000. 3) J.S. Lim and A.V. Oppenheim, Enhancement and bandwidth cpmpression of noisy speech, Proc. IEEE, vol.67, no.12, pp.1586-1604, 1979. c 2011 6/(12)

1 -- 5 -- 5 5--2 2009 7 1) WF WF WF WF 5--2--1 N x y y y = Bx + n (5 26) B n n x WF x ˆx ˆx = Ay (5 27) E[ x ˆx 2 ] E[( )] ( ) ( ) ( ) A 2) A = RB T (BRB T + Q) 1 (5 28) ( ) T ( ) ( ) 1 ( ) R Q R = E[xx T ] Q = E[nn T ] (5 29) (5 30) B Q (5 28) WF R R WF WF 1 WF x n WF 2-D DFT 2-D DCT c 2011 7/(12)

2-D DFT B x n X Y 2-D DFT U U U H U H U U H U = UU H = I I (5 27) (5 28) 2-D DFT 3) ˆX = ΩY Ω = UAU H = ΛD H (DΛD H + Γ) 1 (5 31) (5 32) a 2-D DFT A = Ua D = UBU H Λ = URU H Γ = UQU H Ω WF ω DFT (k) ω DFT (k) = λ(k)d H (k) ; k = 1, 2,, N λ(k) d(k) 2 + γ(k) (5 33) d(k) 2 λ(k) γ(k) D 2 Λ Γ k ˆx = U H ˆX B X Y 2-D DFT 2-D DCT 2 2-D DWT WF 2-D DWT 2-D DWT 2-D DWT WF (5 33) WF WF 2-D DWT β(k) ω DWT (k) = β(k) + σ ; k = 1, 2,, N (5 34) 2 β(k) 2-D DWT σ 2 3 FIR-WF 4) x x S y S WF FIR-WF FIR-WF WF WF x ˆx ˆx = a T y S (5 35) a E[(x ˆx) 2 ] a 5) a = C 1 c (5 36) c 2011 8/(12)

C c y S y S x C = E[y S y T S ] c = E[y S x] (5 37) (5 38) (5 36) a WF 1 a = C 1 c + C 1 1 1 T C 1 1 (1 1T C 1 c) (5 39) 1 1 4 WF WF WF 6) (5 28) WF (5 28) 0 Q B WF B B WF 1 WF 2 WF 1 WF WF Tichonov 2) d H (k) ω DFT (k) = d(k) 2 + ɛ ; k = 1, 2,, N (5 40) 2 ɛ 2 (5 33) WF λ(k) γ(k) 5 WF MMSE 5) ˆx = E[x y] (5 41) E[x y] y x x n MMSE WF 5) 5--2--2 WF 5--2--1(4) WF WF c 2011 9/(12)

1 WF WF 7) 2 1 2-D DWT 2-D DCT 2 1 WF a 2-D DWT 2-D DWT (5 34) β(k) 2 W 1 2-D DWT 2-D DWT X ˆX 1 W 2 X ˆX 2 = W 2 W1 T ˆX 1 (5 34) β(k) ˆX 2 2 (k) ˆX 2 (k) ˆX 2 k W 2 2-D DWT β(k) (5 34) WF 7) b 2-D DCT 2-D DCT 2-D DCT 8) 2 WF 1 2-D DCT WF 2 1 WF 8) 2 x f (x) y f (x y) x ˆx(y) L[x, ˆx(y)] L[x, ˆx(y)] L[x, ˆx(y)] = x ˆx(y) 2 (5 42) x x L[x, ˆx(y)] E[L[x, ˆx(y)] x] f (x) EE[L[x, ˆx(y)] x] EE[L[x, ˆx(y)] y] f (y) f (x y) E[L[x, ˆx(y)] y] 2 ˆx(y) = E[x y] MMSE 5) WF MMSE c 2011 10/(12)

f (x) 9) 3 GMM 4) x L GMM M f (x L ) = P(s i )N(x L 0, R i ) i=1 (5 43) f ( ) M P(s) s N( µ, R) µ R ( ) GMM M E[ x ˆx 2 ] = N E[(x ˆx) 2 s i ]P(s i ) i=1 (5 44) E[(x ˆx) 2 s i ] WF FIR WF 10) GMM 11) WF WF a DWT DWT Λ L DWT Λ LO Λ L Γ L GMM [z i : i = 1, 2,, M] i z i Λ LO + Γ L GSM 10) b GMM EM 12) P(s i ), R i : i = 1, 2, M GMM 5--2--1(5) WF MMSE GMM WF MMSE 1) A. Jain, Fundamentals of Digital Image Processing. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 1989. c 2011 11/(12)

2), II, vol.71, no.6, pp.593-601, June 1988. 3) Richard A. Haddad, Thomas W. Parsons, Digital Signal Processing, NY: Computer Science Press, 1991. 4) P.A. Maragos, R.W. Shafer and R.M. Mersereau, Two-Dimensional Linear Prediction and Its Application to Adaptive Predictive Coding of Images, IEEE Trans. Acoust. Speech & Signal Processing, vol. ASSP 32, no.6, pp.1213-1228, Dec. 1988. 5) Louis L. Scharf, Statistical Signal Processing, MA: Addison-Wesley Publishing Company, 1991. 6) R. Neelamani, H. Choi, and R.G. Baraniuk, ForWaRD: Fourier wavelet regularized deconvolution for ill-conditioned systems, IEEE Trans. Signal Process., vol.52, no.2, pp.418-433, Feb. 2004. 7) S. Ghael, A. Sayeed, R. Baraniuk, Improved wavelet denoising via empirical wiener filtering, Proceedings of SPIE, San Diego, July 1997. 8) Foi, A., V. Katkovnik, and K. Egiazarian, Pointwise Shape-Adaptive DCT for High-Quality Denoising and Deblocking of Grayscale and Color Images, IEEE Trans. Image Process., vol.16, no.5, pp.1395-1411, May 2007. 9) Jose M. Bioucas-Dias, Bayesian Wavelet-Based Image Deconvolution:A GEM Algorithm Exploiting a Class of Heavy-Tailed Priors, IEEE Trans. Image Process., vol.15, no.4, April 2006. 10) Javier Portilla, Vasily Strela, Martin J. Wainwright, and Eero P. Simoncelli, Image Denoising Using Scale Mixtures of Gaussians in the Wavelet Domain, IEEE Trans. Image Process, vol.12, no.11, Nov. 2003. 11) Yamane et. al., Image Restoration Using a Universal GMM Learning and Adaptive Wiener Filter, IEICE Trans. A, vol.92-a, no.10, Oct. 2009. 12) A. Dempster, N. Laird and D. Rubin, Maximum likelihood from incomplete data via the EM algorithm, J. Roy. Statist. Soc. B, vol.39, pp.1-38, 1977. c 2011 12/(12)