アロー『やってみて学習』から学習:経済成長にとっての教訓 Learning from `Learning by Doing': Lessons for Economic Growth

Similar documents


開発金融増刊号

デフレ不況下の金融政策をめぐる政治過程

untitled

2 / 24

橡motonishi.PDF


2 (cf. 1995) (1) (Call Externality) (2) (Network Externality) / 2 Leibenstein (1950) Rohlfs(1974) 1.1 Leibenstein(1950) (Morgenstern 1948) (Von Neuman


2015 : (heterogenous) Heterogeneous homogeneous Heterogenous agent model Bewley 1 (The Overlapping-Generations Models:OLG) OLG OLG Allais (1

【表紙】経済学論叢_18号/表1・3・背

表紙_目次.PDF

Title 資本のヴィンテージ 研究開発と生産性 Author(s) 徳井, 丞次 ; 乾, 友彦 ; 落合, 勝昭 Citation Issue Date Type Technical Report Text Version publisher URL

Jorgenson F, L : L: Inada lim F =, lim F L = k L lim F =, lim F L = 2 L F >, F L > 3 F <, F LL < 4 λ >, λf, L = F λ, λl 5 Y = Const a L a < α < CES? C

p *2 DSGEDynamic Stochastic General Equilibrium New Keynesian *2 2

shuron.dvi

60 Vol. 44 No. 1 2 準市場 化の制度的枠組み: 英国 教育改革法 1988 の例 Education Reform Act a School Performance Tables LEA 4 LEA LEA 3

2017 : (heterogenous) Heterogeneous homogeneous Heterogenous agent model Bewley 1 exante (The Overlapping-Generations Models:OLG) OLG OLG Al

第3章 産業構造変化とその見方: ペティ=クラークの法則から動学的一般均衡分析まで

BB 報告書完成版_修正版) doc

デフレの定義(最新版).PDF

Microsoft Word - Šv”|“Å‘I.DOC

日本は今なお熟練労働集約的な財を純輸出しているか?

* *2 Russell et al. (2015) 2

(1) (Karlan, 2004) (1) (1973) (1978) (1991) (1991) 1


わが国企業による資金調達方法の選択問題


Taro-修士論文.PDF

マネタリスト・モデルによるスタグフレーションの分析

bottleneckjapanese.dvi


Title ベンチャー企業の研究開発支出の決定要因 日本と台湾の事例を中心に Author(s) 蘇, 顯揚 Citation 經濟論叢 (1996), 158(1): Issue Date URL Right

Becker 1965 Gronau a a a

所得税と課税最低限に関する一考察

Kobe University Repository : Kernel タイトル Title 著者 Author(s) 掲載誌 巻号 ページ Citation 刊行日 Issue date 資源タイプ Resource Type 版区分 Resource Version 権利 Rights DOI

Winter 図 1 図 OECD OECD OECD OECD 2003

2016 (8) Variety Expansion Effects by Feenstra (1994) 1 Variety Effects Dixit and Stiglitz (1977) CES n n? n t U t = ( nt i=1 σ > 1, a it > 0,

Stepwise Chow Test * Chow Test Chow Test Stepwise Chow Test Stepwise Chow Test Stepwise Chow Test Riddell Riddell first step second step sub-step Step

1 Flores, D. (009) All you can drink: should we worry about quality? Journal of Regulatory Economics 35(1), Saggi, K., and Vettas, N. (00) On in

商学56‐5・6◆/8.二村


Graduate School of Policy and Management, Doshisha University 53 動学的資本税協調と公的資本形成 あらまし Zodrow and Mieszkowski 1986 Wilson 1986 Batina はじめに Zodr

II III I ~ 2 ~

中堅中小企業向け秘密保持マニュアル


PR映画-1


- 2 -


1 (1) (2)

物価指数の計測誤差と品質調整手法:わが国CPIからの教訓

COE-RES Discussion Paper Series Center of Excellence Project The Normative Evaluation and Social Choice of Contemporary Economic Systems Graduate Scho

, 3, 1999, 4,,


Masahiro NAKANO Keynes benchmark Keynes 89


untitled

untitled

自殺の経済社会的要因に関する調査研究報告書

通し組/2.論説:大橋克成

表紙参照.PDF

グローバル・バリュー・チェーンの長さ指標:製造業とサービス業

JSPS Grants-in-Aid for Creative Scientific Research Understanding Inflation Dynamics of the Japanese Economy Working Paper Series No.7 日本家計の消費 貯蓄 労働プロ

- March

46−ª3�=4�“ƒ‚S“·‚Ö‡¦

競売不動産からみた首都圏地価の動向

ワールド・ワイド 10‐2(P)/3.中尾

GDPギャップと潜在成長率

Kobe University Repository : Kernel タイトル Title 著者 Author(s) 掲載誌 巻号 ページ Citation 刊行日 Issue date 資源タイプ Resource Type 版区分 Resource Version 権利 Rights DOI

Title 最適年金の理論 Author(s) 藤井, 隆雄 ; 林, 史明 ; 入谷, 純 ; 小黒, 一正 Citation Issue Date Type Technical Report Text Version publisher URL


D F I CP (equity finance) CP (debt finance) ( )


incompatible 2. 基 本 となるモデル オリジナルモデル A B, A x A B x A B x B A x B x A x B x A x B x B x A A B i AB t Hendricks et al. 84

untitled

[ ]友原(責)岩.indd

IMES Discussion Paper Series 98-J

19世紀の物価動向―コンドラチェフによる物価長波の検討を通じて―*

( β K ) p β W W p β K K aβ β W W β β K K ) 1/(βW +β K ) 3 ln C =lnα + 1 β W + β K ln Q (3) 1/(β W + β K ) ( β W + β K ) 4 ( ) ( ) ( ) ( 1998

Excess Capacity and Effectiveness of Policy Interventions: Evidence from the Cement Industry SMU

株式保有構成と企業価値 ─コーポレート・ガバナンスに関する一考察─


5 I The Current Situation and Future Prospects of the North Korean Economy presented at the 2014 Korea Dialogue Conference on Strengthenin

, Exchange & Finamce

topics_040

1 食品安全を主な目的とする取組

2 3 4 II ,000 3, , ,010 3, , % (2%) ,

2 DEA Bain Mann Strickland and Weiss Structure Conduct Performance S-C-P Brozen Demsetz

第2期中国経営品質協議会

財政のサステナビリティと長期金利の動向


濱田弘潤 : 多角化企業の利潤分析 77 多角化企業の利潤分析 多角化ディスカウントの寡占理論による説明 * 濱田弘潤 (diversification discount) Keywords: JEL classifications: D43, L13, L22, G

野村資本市場研究所|アジアの金融競争力(PDF)

1 CAPM: I-,,, I- ( ) 1 I- I- I- ( CAPM) I- CAPM I- 1 I- Jensen Fama-French 3 I- Fama-French 3 I- Fama-MacBeth I- SMB-FL, HML-FL Fama-MacBeth 1 Fama-Fr

商学 63‐3☆/6.山本

Law and Economics Review vol.4,no.1(february 2009) 1998

幕末期の貨幣供給:万延二分金・銭貨を中心に

<96D889BA904D2E696E6464>

Transcription:

Learning from Learning by Doing : Lessons for Economic Growth M *1 * 2 1997 2004 10 1-2013 12 29 Version1.0 2014 3 2 *1 c 2010 MIT *2 c 2004-2013

i 1993 40 MIT 1991

ii R.M.S. * 1 *1

iii i 1 1 2 15 3 27 4 43 57

1 1 (1962) *1 1962 *1 :middlebrow theory.

2 1 30 1962 1/3 RAND

3 1962 (Solow, Tobin, von Weizsäcker, and Yaari, 1965 ) ( ) product

4 1 30 g(t) t G(t) t 1 a G bg n n 1/3 ) ) G G L = b g n dg (1.1) G G x = a(g G ) (1.2) (1.1) G (1.2) x = ag [ 1 ( ) 1/(1 n) ] 1 L cg 1 n (1.3) n 1 c = b/(1 n) n = 1 (1.3) G G

5 n < 1 n > 1 G L n > 1 n 1 n = 1 n > 1 k k n n = 1/3 k 1/1 + 1/2 n + 1/2 n + 1/2 n... + 1/k n n > 1 k=1 k n n > 1 n 1 n > 1 n > 1 L n = 1/3 (1.3) n 1 ( n = 0 ) 0 < n < 1 L cg 1 n cg 1 n L n > 1 c = b/(1 n) 1 G ( ) n/(1 n) x G = 1 1 L cg 1 n (1.4) n 1 ) ( ) 2n 1 2 x G 2 = nl c Gn 2 1 L 1 n cg 1 n (1.5) n < 1 n > 1 G G

6 1 n > 1 () L L G 1 n γ γ/(1 n) n < 1 (s ) 1962 n < 1 (1.3) G L 1/1 n 1 n < 1 n > 1 1 n > 1 n > 1 1 1

7 n = 1 (1.3) n = 1 c = b/(1 n) (1.1) (1.2) (1.3) 1962 x = ag ( 1 e L/b) (1.6) G 1 s (1.6) G sa(1 e L/b ) G s sa 50 n = 1 AK 1962

8 1 (1.6) n = 1 n 1 n n < 1 n < 1 n = 1 n > 1 AK 1 1 1

9 1 n 1 1 1 2.1 1.9 AK

10 1 AK

11 dh dt dh dt = khf(l H) = kh m f(l H ) m < 1 m > 1 L H m = 1 H kf(l H ) L H H AK AK MIT

12 1 1962

13

15 2

16 2 G bg n B + bg n a a/b B = 0 B 1.3

17 n = 1/2 1 0 n n G L = b (B + bg 1/2 dg G (2.1) x = a(g G ) (2.2) n = 1/2 2.1 G 2.2 x = a (2.3) d = 2b/B 2.3 L 2.1 B(G G ) < L 2.2 x < al/b 2.3 B-17

18 2 B q < 1 k B q k B 0 B 0 q q q q 1 m h mh 1 mh m a k

19 k + 1 (q k q k+1 )B 0 k + 1 1 G q k+1 B 0 + bg 1/2 k k 1 2.1 2.3 G G B q 1 i G a/(q i B 0 + bg 1/2 ) G

20 2 m q G n 1962 1

21 factor share drift bg n

22 2 q k B 0 + = r nr B + bg n nr B q m 1/m 1/5 5 1 q 0.9 10 2 m(1 q) nr m(1 q) q k B 0 bg n )

23 (m) (1 q) T k mt T t 0 t 0 + T x B t 0 t 0 + T B x ln q xt 1 ln q m ln q ln q = ln[1 (1 q)] (1 q) x mt mt 1 (ln q) 2 m(1 q) 2 /T

24 2 (n) (1 q) t k t t k+1 > t > t k [G(t) G(t k )] n > G(t) n **************************** 30

25

27 3 1 2.1 2.2 B = B 0 q k B 0 q k m a[bg n + B 0 q k ] 1 B 0 a 1 [bg n + q k ] 1 b t G(t) G(t) G t = G t 1 + x t (1 + r) t x t 1 r 0.03

28 3 G 1a 1b 100 50 b = 1, n = 0.33, m = 0.2, q = 0.95 1/3 5 1a 1b 100 10-15 50 5 50 1.25 0.1

29 q b m G m q r 2a 2b 1a 1b b 1 2 3a 3b b = 1 n = 0.33 m = 0.5 q = 0.98 m(1 q)

30 3 1 (1 q) 1a 1b 2a 2b q = 0.95 q q 1.00.980.950.90 0.1, 0.2, 0.5, 0.2 q 0.9511 q = 0 0.1 q 4a, 4b q

31 b = 1 m = 0.2 5a, 5b m = 0.5q = 0.98 2 (n) 0.33 0.5 G(t) 5c

32 3

33 m 0 = 0.5 t t 1 m t = (1 + u) m t 1 t 1 m t = (1 + u) 1 m t 1 u 0.05, 0.1, 0.15 b = 1, n = 0.33, q = 0.98 100 50 6a, 6b, 6c u = 0.05, 0.1, 0.15 6a 6b 6c t = 20 t = 35 t = 50 15 (1 + u) (1 + u) 1 (1 + u) (1 + v) 1 m t n b

34 3

35-1 n 1 1 n < 1 50 100 100 200 200 50 3 51 100 b = 1, n = 0.33, m = 0.2, q 0.95 100 200 100 t = 10 7a 100 3 2.5 3 7b 51 1 100 3 2.5 2 7a 7c 5 4 3 4 7a 7c 50 20-25 0.5 0.5

36 3

37 3 5 b 2 n 0.5 m 0 = 0.5 v = u = 0.05 5 5 m t 0.8 0.2 () () b = 1, n = 0.33, q = 0.98 m(1 q) 0.01 0.5 0.525 0.475 0.1 0.105 0.095 50 3 50 1,2 4, 5 3 100 5 200 5 8a,b,c,d,e 51-100 g

38 3 t = 100 t = 50 50 3

39 t = 50 t = 100 8c 3 1.35 2.1 0.6 1.5 8a 1.25 1.82 3 1 50 30

40 3 25 (35 25)/35 (1.10 0.82)/1.10 8b 2 8a 8c 8e 1.45 2.35 2.4 3 5 50 30 25 4 8d 8c 8e 8c 55 20-25 50 5 50 20 60

41 2

43 4

44 4 4.1 Energizer Bunny. Still going and going and going... *1 1988 GNP USD37,608 1985 GNP Summers and Heston 6.5 8.5 *1

45 1 2 30

46 4 30 1950 1960 1970 OPEC 1 1

47 GNP 20 25

48 4 1

49 GDP x y 1950 1960 1 GNP 2

50 4 3 1950 1960 1980 2

51

52 4 30 40 2 30 138 A D

53 GDP GDP GDP )

54 4 2 30 30 ky

55 GDP 40 30

57 Kenneth Arrow The Economic Implications of Learning by Doing, Review of Economic Studies 28 (1962): 155-73 David Levhari Further Implications of Learning by Doing, Review of Economic Studies 33 (1967): 31-38 Extensions of Arrow s Learning by Doing, Review of Economic Studies 33 (1967): 117-31 Eytan Sheshinski Tests of the Learning-by-Doing Hypothesis, Review of Economics and Statistics 49 (1967): 568-78 1930 Werner Hirsch, Manufacturing Progress Functions, Review of Economics and Statistics 34 (1952): 143-55 Armen Alchian, Reliability of Progress Curves in Airframe Production, Econometrica 31 (1963): 679-93 RAND Linda Argote and Dennis Epple, Learning Curves in Manufacturing, Science 247 (1990): 920-24 Sherwin Rosen, Learning by Experience as Joint Production, textitquarterly Journal of Economics 86 (1972):366-82 Drew Fudenberg and Jean Tirole, Learning by Doing and Market Performance, Bell Journal 14 (1983): 522-30 Alwyn Young, Learning by Doing and the Dynamic Effects of International Trade, Quarterly Journal of Economics 106 (1991): 369-406 Young, Invention and Bounded Learning by Doing, Journal of Political Economy 101 (1993): 443-72 Philippe Aghion and Peter Howitt, A Model of Growth Throught Creative Destruction, Econometrica 60 (1992): 323-51; Robert Solow, James Tobin, Christian von Weizäcker, and Menachem Yaari, Neoclassical Growth with Fixed Factor Proportions, Review of Economic Studies 33 (1965): 79-115; Robert Summers and Alan Heston, The Penn World Table (Mark 5): An Expanded Set of International Comparisons, 1950-1988, Quarterly Journal of Economics 106 (1991): 327-68.