Japanese Journal of Administrative Science Volume17, No.3, 2004, 185-196. Effectiveness of Collaborative Leadership in Research: A Case Study of the Research and Development Team's Creation of the Alzheimer's Drug, "Aricept" Yoshio ONO (Shiga University) When conducting research into the process of leadership, it is necessary to view it from the standpoint of both the leader and the follower. This is because most studies focus on the characteristic behaviors of the leader as opposed to the team member. While knowledge of these leadership characteristics are tantamount to the success of any project, the implication should not be that guidance and direction only flows "top-down" from leader to subordinate. The relationship between one who leads and one who follows is intrinsically linked, so the perceptions of both should be taken into account when studying the leadership process. With this in mind, the collaborative approach taken by an R & D team in their development of a drug used to treat Alzheimer's, Aricept, is the focus of this paper. The field research I conducted was motivated by this collaboration. I approached this study from a narrative style in obtaining data, as I believe this style best represents the thought processes of the narrator as well as the actions of the participants. The key element of this case study is that the team leader diffused responsibility equally, and cultivated feedback from all members, in the successful development of the drug. This collaboration allowed the team's creative juices to flow continuously, enhanced project efficiency, and contributed to the realization of this innovative drug. Keywords: leadership; follower; context; field research; qualitative method.

Bennis, W., and B, Nanus. (1985), Leaders: The Strategies for Taking Change, New York: Harper & Approach," Leadership Quarterly 6 (3): 329-341. Blank, W. (1995), The Nine Natural New York: AMACOM. Laws of Leadership, Bryman, A., M. Bresnen., and A. Beardsworth. (1988), "Q ualitative Research and the Study of Leadership," Human Relations, 41 (3): 13-30. Bryman, A., and M. Stephens. (1996), "The importance of context: Qualitative research and the study of leadership," Leadership Quarterly, 7 (3): 353-371. Boyett, J. H., and J. T. Boyett (1998), The Guru Guide The Best Ideas of The Top Management Thinkers, Transformational Leader, New York: John Wiley & Calder, B. J. (1977), "An Attribution Theory of Leadership," in Staw, B. M., and G. R. Salancik eds., New Directions in Organization Behavior, Chicago: St. Clair Press, pp.179-204. Clark, B. R. (1972), "The Organizational Saga in Higher Education", Administrative Science Quarterly, 17: 178-184. Hara, T. (2003), Innovation in the Pharmaceutical Industry: The Process of Drug Discovery and Development, Edward Elger. Behavior (Vol.12), Greenwich, CT: JAI Press., pp.159-203. Meindl, J. R. (1995), "The Romance of Leadership as a Follower Centric Theory: A Social Constructionist Pfeffer, J. (1977), "The Ambiguity of Leadership", Academy of Management Review, 2: 104-112. Schein, E. H. (1985), Organizational Culture and Tichy, N. M., and M. A. Devanna (1986), The Wilkins, A. L. (1983), "Organizational Stories as Symbols Which Control the Organization," in Pondy, L., P, Frost., G, Morgan., and T, Dandredge. eds. Organizational CT. Symbolism, JAI Press, Greenwich, Wilkins, A. L. (1984), "The Creation of Company Cultures: The Role of Stories Human Resource Human Resource Management, 23: 41 60. Systems," Martin, J. (1982), "Stories and Scripts in Organization Settings," In Hansdorf, A and A. Isen eds., Cognitive Social Psychology, Holland, pp.255-305. New York: Elsevier-North Meindl, J. R., S. B. Ehrlich., and J.M. Dukerich. (1985), "The Romance of Leadership," Academy of Management Review, 30: 78402. Meindl, J. R. (1990), "On Leadership: An Alternative to the Conventional Wisdom". In B. M. Staw and L. L. Cummings eds., Research in Organizational