ヒストリカル法によるバリュー・アット・リスクの計測:市場価格変動の非定常性への実務的対応

Similar documents
カルマンフィルターによるベータ推定( )

Stepwise Chow Test * Chow Test Chow Test Stepwise Chow Test Stepwise Chow Test Stepwise Chow Test Riddell Riddell first step second step sub-step Step

商品流動性リスクの計量化に関する一考察(その2)―内生的流動性リスクを考慮したストレス・テスト―

03.Œk’ì

山形大学紀要

バリュー・アット・リスクのリスク指標としての妥当性について ― 理論的サーベイによる期待ショートフォールとの比較分析―


わが国企業による資金調達方法の選択問題


PDFŠpŒ{ٶ


IMES Discussion Paper Series 98-J


Microsoft Word - 査読SP問題110510RR.doc

合理的個人VS

日経225オプションデータを使ったGARCHオプション価格付けモデルの検証


2 1,2, , 2 ( ) (1) (2) (3) (4) Cameron and Trivedi(1998) , (1987) (1982) Agresti(2003)

IMES DISCUSSION PAPER SERIES Discussion Paper No. 99-J- 9 -J-19 INSTITUTE FOR MONETARY AND ECONOMIC STUDIES BANK OF JAPAN

GDPギャップと潜在成長率

082_rev2_utf8.pdf

23_02.dvi

II III II 1 III ( ) [2] [3] [1] 1 1:

fiúŁÄ”s‘ê‡ÌŁª”U…−…X…N…v…„…~…A…•‡Ì ”s‘ê™´›ß…−…^†[…fiŠ‚ª›Âfl’«

わが国のレポ市場について―理論的整理と実証分析―

国際流動性に関する財政的側面について

村本 孜71‐89/71‐89



インフレの不確実性とインフレ率水準の関係

dvi

text.dvi


And Business

1 Nelson-Siegel Nelson and Siegel(1987) 3 Nelson-Siegel 3 Nelson-Siegel 2 3 Nelson-Siegel 2 Nelson-Siegel Litterman and Scheinkman(199

60 Vol. 44 No. 1 2 準市場 化の制度的枠組み: 英国 教育改革法 1988 の例 Education Reform Act a School Performance Tables LEA 4 LEA LEA 3

会社法制上の資本制度の変容と企業会計上の資本概念について

開発金融増刊号

本組よこ/根間:文11-029_P377‐408

競売不動産からみた首都圏地価の動向


P.5 P.6 P.3 P.4 P.7 P.8 P.9 P.11 P.19

日本統計学会誌, 第45巻, 第2号, 329頁-352頁

Kyoto University * Filipino Students in Japan and International Relations in the 1930s: An Aspect of Soft Power Policies in Imperial Japan

(a) (b) (c) Canny (d) 1 ( x α, y α ) 3 (x α, y α ) (a) A 2 + B 2 + C 2 + D 2 + E 2 + F 2 = 1 (3) u ξ α u (A, B, C, D, E, F ) (4) ξ α (x 2 α, 2x α y α,

untitled

2 / 24

Graduate School of Policy and Management, Doshisha University 53 動学的資本税協調と公的資本形成 あらまし Zodrow and Mieszkowski 1986 Wilson 1986 Batina はじめに Zodr

アジアの資本移動の変化に関するクラスター分析 アジア域内の証券投資活性化に向けて

autocorrelataion cross-autocorrelataion Lo/MacKinlay [1988, 1990] (A)

201/扉

1 (1997) (1997) 1974:Q3 1994:Q3 (i) (ii) ( ) ( ) 1 (iii) ( ( 1999 ) ( ) ( ) 1 ( ) ( 1995,pp ) 1

Vol.8 No (July 2015) 2/ [3] stratification / *1 2 J-REIT *2 *1 *2 J-REIT % J-REIT J-REIT 6 J-REIT J-REIT 10 J-REIT *3 J-

Transcription:

VaR VaR VaR VaR GARCH E-mail : yoshitaka.andou@boj.or.jp

VaR VaR LTCM VaR VaR VaR VaR VaR VaR VaR

VaR t P(t) P(= P() P(t)) Pr[ P X] =, X t100 (1 )VaR VaR P100 P X X (1 ) VaR VaR

VaR VaR VaR VaR VaR VaR VaR VaR VaR VaR VaR Exponentially Weighted Moving Average Method t 2 t 2 t 1 r t 1 2 t = 2 t 1 + (1 )r 2 t 1 (0<<1) 2 t = (1 )Σ k =1 k 1 r 2 t k i, j 2 ij,t = 2 ij,t 1 + (1 )r i,t 1 r j,t 1

VaR VaR VaR t x t T x t T,, x t 2, x t 1 r t T+1,, r t 1, r t x t i +1 r t i +1 = 1, i = 1,,T. x t i P(x t ) P = P(x t +1 ) P(x t ) r t T+1,, r t 1, r t T{x (T) t +1,, x (2) t +1, x (1) t+1 } x (i) t +1 = x t (1+r t i +1 ), i = 1,,T, T{ P 1, P 2,, P T } P i = P(x (i) t +1 ) P(x t ), i = 1,,T. { P 1, P 2,, P T } P VaR P i { P (1 ), P (2),, P (T ) }, r t i +1 = ln(x t i +1 /x t i ) (i =1,,T )

VaR100(1 ) P ((T+1 )) VaR(T+ 1) (T+1) VaR VaRsample quantile t n{x 1,t, x 2,t,, x n, t }T {x 1,t T, x 2,t T,,x n, t T },,{x 1,t 2, x 2,t 2,,x n, t 2 },{x 1,t 1, x 2,t 1,, x n, t 1 }, {r 1,t T+1, r 2,t T +1,,r n, t T+1 },,{r 1,t 1, r 2,t 1,,r n, t 1 },{r 1,t, r 2,t,, r n, t }. P {x 1,t, x 2,t,, x n, t } P = P(x 1,t +1, x 2,t +1,, x n, t +1 ) P (x 1,t, x 2,t,, x n, t ) i = 1,2,, T t i + 1{r 1,t i+1, r 2,t i+1,, r n, t i+1 } T {x (i) 1,t +1, x(i) 2,t +1,, x (i) n, t +1 } x (i) 1,t +1= x 1,t (1+r 1,t i +1 ) x (i) 2,t +1= x 2,t (1+r 2,t i +1 ) x (i) n, t +1= x n, t (1+r n, t i +1 ), i = 1,,T. T P i = P(x (i) 1,t +1, x (i) 2,t +1,, x (i) n, t +1 ) P(x 1,t, x 2,t,, x n, t ), i = 1,,T, { P 1, P 2,, P T }VaR VaR{ P 1, P 2,, P T } P100

VaR Efron VaR { P (1 ), P (2),, P (T ) } T VaR VaRVaR VaR VaR Harrell and Davis { P (1 ), P (2),, P (T ) }100 P P (i) = T w i P, T ( i) i = 1 P, w T,i w T, i 1 = ( k, T k + 1) i / T y k 1 ( i 1) / T ( 1 y) T k dy, k = ( T+ 1), VaR Inui, Kijima and Kitano

HDHD HD = T = w T,i VaRi i = (T +1) w T,i i T == T == T == T == HD Sheather and Marron HD HD (a, b) (a, b) = 1 0 y a 1 (1 y ) b 1 dy (a, b >0)HD n i =1 w T,i = 1, w T,i > 0 X (i) L = n i =1 w i X (i), w i 0, n i =1 w i = 1LL HDL

{x 1, x 2,, x n } f (x) 1 f ( x) = nh n i. i= 1 x x K h h K(u) (2 ) e 2 /2 [, ] 3/4 (1 u 2 ) [ 1,1] 15/16 (1 u 2 2 ) [ 1,1] VaR VaRVaRHD VaR VaR VaRButler and Schachter VaR

VaR VaRVaR VaR HDVaR VaRHDVaR VaR HD VaR

VaR VaR VaR VaR Boudoukh, Richardson and WhitelawHull and WhiteBarone-Adesi, Giannopoulos and Vosper Boudoukh, Richardson and WhitelawVaR VaRBRW

BRW BRW VaR 1,2,, T T { P 1, P 2,, P T } { P 1, P 2,, P T } (0 < < 1) {w 1, w 2,, w T } 1 w i = i 1. 1 T decay factor { P 1, P 2,, P T }{ P (1 ), P (2),, P (T ) }{w (1 ), w (2),, w (T ) } VaR100(1 ) VaR VaR w (1 ) P (1 ) VaR (a) (b) k k+ 1 w( i) < w( i) i = 1 i= 1 k k+1 VaR = {( w( i )) P( ( ) 1) ( )} k+ + w( i ) P k i= 1 i= 1 w ( k+ 1), w (1) VaR = P (1). T i =1 w i = T i =1 (1 ) i 1 /(1 T )=1 BRW P (i ) P j w (i ) = w j P (k) k i =1 w (i ) 100 { k 1 i =1 w (i ) + w (k) /2} 100 w (i ) = 1/n P (k) (k /n) 100 {(k 0.5)/n} 100 P (k) {k /(n+1)} 100nkk VaR BRWVaR VaR

BRWVaR VaR = = = = BRWVaR =0.99 N i =1 (1 )i 1 /(1 T )> 0.99N

VaR BRW VaR VaR VaR VaRVaR BRWVaR VaR Hull and White

HW HW r t r t = t t, t2 = 2 t 1 +(1 )r 2 t 1. t t t r t t +1 t +1 VaR r t +1 t +1 t +1 N(0,1) HW t i+1 (i = 1,,T ) t i+1 (i = 1,,T ) r t i+1 (i = 1,,T ) t i+1 (i = 1,,T ) t i+1 = r t i+1 / t i+1, i = 1,,T, t +1 r t +1 VaR {r t T+1,, r t 1,r t } { t T+1,, t 1, t } t+1 t +1 r r t i+ 1= t + 1 t + 1, i = 1, 2,, T, i t i+ 1 {r t T+1,, r t 1,r t } t +1 / t i +1

{r t T+1,, r t 1,r t } VaR VaR NYHWVaR = 0.94 VaR BRWVaR HW VaR HW t VaR

HWVaR VaR Barone-Adesi, Giannopoulos and Vosper GARCHHW FHS: filtering historical simulationfhs FHSHW t Barone-Adesi, Bourgoin and Giannopoulos

r t GARCH r t = t t, t2 = +r 2 t 1+ 2 t 1. t FHSGARCH HW GARCH VaR HW HW NYFHSVaR GARCHGARCH GARCH t t

HWVaR GARCH HWVaR BRWHWFHS HS VaR BRWHW HSBRWHWFHS BRW HSHWFHS VaRHSBRW HWFHS Boudoukh, Richardson and WhitelawHull and White

VCV EWMAHSBRWHWFHSVaR VaR VaR VaR VaR = =

Bloomberg VaR VaR

VaR LIBOR BPV VaR Hendricks

VaRT HSHDVaR HSHSSQHSHD VaRVaR VaRVaR VaR EWMABRWHW BRWEWMAHW EWMA HW

VaRVaR VaRVaR VaR VaR VaR X t 1 ( t Var) X t = 0 ( t Var). {X t } {X t } VaR VaR VaRVaRVaR VaR VaR VaR VaR VaR VaR HDVaR Hull and White

VaR VaR HWFHSHSBRW VCVEWMA BRW HS

HSVCV BRWHW

EWMABRWHW FHSVCVHS EWMABRWHW BRW BRW VaR VaRVaR VaRVaR VaR VaR VaRVaR

VCVHS VaR HW VaRVaR HWVaR HW VaR HW HWFHS VaR VaRHW

VaR VaRHW VaR HW VaR Inui, Kijima and Kitanot HSSQVaRVaR HSHDVaRHSSQ VaR Inui, Kijima and KitanoVaR VaRVaR HSHDHSSQ VaR Inui, Kijima and Kitano VaR t

VaR EWMABRW HSHW VaRVCV EWMAHS VaRBRWHW FHSVaR VaR

HSHWVaR HWFHS VaRVaR HWFHSVaR HW VaR VaR HSBRWHW FHS VaRVaR VaRVaR VaRVaR VaR VaRVaR VaR

VaR VaR VaR VaR VaR VaR VaR VaRHS BRWHS HWFHSHS HWFHSGARCH HS HWFHS VaR HS HSSQHSBRWBRWHW FHS VaRHS VaR Basel Committee on Banking Supervision VaR HSBRWHWFHS

BRWHWFHS VaR VaR HSBRWVaR VaRVaR HSBRW VaR HSBRWVaR HSBRW VaRHSBRW VaR

VaR VaR HSSQHSBRWHW FHS HS BRWHS HWFHS HWFHS VaR VaR BRWHWFHSVaR HWFHS VaR HWFHSVaR HSHDVCVEWMA

VaRVaRVaR VaRHSBRW VaR HSBRWVaR HS BRWHS VaR BRW HSHS BRWHWFHSVaRVCVEWMA VCV EWMA HSHS HS HS

VaR HS BRWHWFHS VaR VaRVaR HSBRW VaRVaR VaR VaR HS BRW VaR

F(x) f (x) {X 1, X 2,, X n } F n (x) =1/ n n i =1 1 {x X i } {X (1 ), X (2),, X (n) }k X (k) n n! i n i F ( x)(1 F( x, i = k ( n i)! i! P { X ( ) x} = )) k X (k) f k (x) 1 k 1 n k fk( x) = F ( x) {1 F ( x)} f ( x), ( k, n k + 1) X (k) E[ X ( k) 1 ] = ( k, n k + 1) 1 = ( k, n k + 1) 1 0 xf ( x) F 1 k 1 ( y) y {1 F ( x)} k 1 (1 y) n k n k df( x) dy, E[X (n+1 ) ] n 100F n (x) 100 HD 1 = (( n + 1), ( n + 1)(1 )) 1 0 F 1 n ( y) y ( n + 1) 1 (1 y) (n +) 1 (1 ) 1 dy, HD n HD = w n X. i = 1, i ( i) w n,i w n, i 1 = ( k, n k + 1) i / n ( i 1)/ n y k 1 n k ( 1 y) dy, k = ( n + 1). 1 {x Xi } x X i x < X i (, ) (k, n k + 1) = (k 1)! (n k)!/n! (n + 1)

(n + 1) = k HD {X (1 ), X (2),, X (n) } n k X (i) X (i) k X (i) n n! j ( i / n) {1 ( i / n)} ( n j )! j! j = k n j, X (i 1) k X (i 1) n ( j = k n n! j n j {( i 1) / n} [1 {( i 1) / n}], j )! j! kx (i ) w n,i w n, i = n n! j ( i / n) {1 ( i / n)} ( n j)! j! j = k n j = k n j n! j {( i 1) / n} [1 {( i 1)/ n}] ( n j)! j! n j, n i =1 w n,i X (i) X Beta (k, n k + 1) Y Bi (n, p) Pr ( X p) = Pr ( Y K) 1 ( k, n k + 1) p y k 1 0 n n k n! ( 1 y) dy = p j 1 p) ( n j )!j! j = k ( n j.

w n,i w n, i 1 = ( k, n k + 1) 1 ( k, n k + 1) i / n 0 y k 1 ( i 1)/ n 1 y k 0 n k ( 1 y) dy n k ( 1 y) dy 1 = ( k, n k + 1) i / n 1 y k ( i 1)/ n n k. ( 1 y) dy HD w n,i HD

{x 1, x 2,, x T }m x {x 1, x 2,, x T } T ( x x x x t k t )( t k ) = + 1 ( k) =, k = 1,2,, m, T 2 ( x x ) t = 1 t LB(m) 2 m (k) LB( m) = T( T + 2 ), k k = 1 T m m χ 2 (m) mχ 2 ( m ) LB(m)>χ 2 (m)m =15 LB(15)>χ 2 (15) =

VaR VaR Barone-Adesi, G., F. Bourgoin, and K. Giannopoulos, Don t Look Back, RISK, 11 (8), 1998, pp. 100-104. K. Giannopoulos, and L.Vosper, VaR without Correlations for Non-linear Portfolios, Journal of Futures Markets, 19, 1999, pp. 583-602. Basel Committee on Banking Supervision, Supervisory framework for the use of backtesting in conjunction with the internal models approach to market risk capital requirements, Basel Committee Publications, 22, January 1996.http://www.bis.org/ http://www.boj.or.jp/ Bollerslev, T., and J. M. Wooldridge, Quasi Maximum Likelihood Estimation and Inference in Dynamic Models with Time Varying Covariances, Econometric Reviews, 11, 1992, pp. 143-172. Boudoukh, J., M. Richardson, and R. Whitelaw, The Best of Both Worlds, RISK, 11 (5), 1998, pp. 64-67. Butler, J. S., and B. Schachter, Estimating Value-at-Risk with a Precision Measure by Combining Kernel Estimation With Historical Simulation, Working Paper, 1997. Efron, B., Bootstrap Methods: Another Look at the Jackknife, The Annals of Statistics, 7, 1979, pp. 1-26. Harrell, F. E., and C. E. Davis, A new distribution-free quantile estimator, Biometrika, 69, 1982, pp. 635-640. Hendricks, D., Evaluation of Value at Risk Models Using Historical Data, Economic Policy Review, Federal Reserve Bank of New York, April 1996, pp. 36-69. Hull, J., and A. White, Incorporating Volatility Updating into the Historical Simulation Method for Value at Risk, Journal of Risk, 1, 1998, pp. 5-19. Inui, K., M. Kijima, and A. Kitano, VaR is subject to a significant positive bias, Working Paper, 70, Graduate School of Economics Kyoto University, 2003. Jorion, P., Value at Risk: The New Benchmark for Managing Financial Risk, McGraw-Hill, Chicago, 2000. Sheather, S. J., and J. S. Marron, Kernel quantile estimators, Journal of the American Statistical Association, 85, 1990, pp. 410-416.