untitled

Similar documents
46−ª3�=4�“ƒ‚S“·‚Ö‡¦

untitled

財政赤字の経済分析:中長期的視点からの考察

ミクロ・データによる家計行動分析: 将来不安と予備的貯蓄

COE-RES Discussion Paper Series Center of Excellence Project The Normative Evaluation and Social Choice of Contemporary Economic Systems Graduate Scho

小塚匡文.indd

GDPギャップと潜在成長率

2 3 4 II ,000 3, , ,010 3, , % (2%) ,

1 1 1 [2000]

デフレ不況下の金融政策をめぐる政治過程

02.„o“φiflì„㙃fic†j

,.,,.,. NIRA,.,.,,, GDP.,., 1%, 2.0% 3).,,.,,., 1, 4).,,.,, GDP,.,,.,,,.,,., 2002.,,., 3), Q&A Q16 (

1990年代以降の日本の経済変動

untitled

, Exchange & Finamce

デフレの定義(最新版).PDF

Jorgenson F, L : L: Inada lim F =, lim F L = k L lim F =, lim F L = 2 L F >, F L > 3 F <, F LL < 4 λ >, λf, L = F λ, λl 5 Y = Const a L a < α < CES? C


Auerbach and Kotlikoff(1987) (1987) (1988) 4 (2004) 5 Diamond(1965) Auerbach and Kotlikoff(1987) 1 ( ) ,


fiúŁÄ”s‘ê‡ÌŁª”U…−…X…N…v…„…~…A…•‡Ì ”s‘ê™´›ß…−…^†[…fiŠ‚ª›Âfl’«


1 CAPM: I-,,, I- ( ) 1 I- I- I- ( CAPM) I- CAPM I- 1 I- Jensen Fama-French 3 I- Fama-French 3 I- Fama-MacBeth I- SMB-FL, HML-FL Fama-MacBeth 1 Fama-Fr

Winter 図 1 図 OECD OECD OECD OECD 2003


(1) (Karlan, 2004) (1) (1973) (1978) (1991) (1991) 1

日本における財政政策のインパクトー1990年代のイベント・スタディー

金融不安・低金利と通貨需要 「家計の金融資産に関する世論調査」を用いた分析

物価変動の決定要因について ― 需給ギャップと物価変動の関係の国際比較を中心に―

Title 最適年金の理論 Author(s) 藤井, 隆雄 ; 林, 史明 ; 入谷, 純 ; 小黒, 一正 Citation Issue Date Type Technical Report Text Version publisher URL

ボーナス制度と家計貯蓄率-サーベイ・データによる再検証-

p *2 DSGEDynamic Stochastic General Equilibrium New Keynesian *2 2


遺産相続、学歴及び退職金の決定要因に関する実証分析 『家族関係、就労、退職金及び教育・資産の世代間移転に関する世帯アンケート調査』

IMES DISCUSSION PAPER SERIES Discussion Paper No. 99-J- 9 -J-19 INSTITUTE FOR MONETARY AND ECONOMIC STUDIES BANK OF JAPAN


国際流動性に関する財政的側面について

Masahiro NAKANO Keynes benchmark Keynes 89

[17]Holmström and Tirole (2000) (1) (2) (1) (2) 1 1 2

表紙_目次.PDF

OSIPP41_p1_2.eps

On model selection problems in terms of prediction mean squared error and interpretaion of AIC (slides)

橡motonishi.PDF

130 Oct Radial Basis Function RBF Efficient Market Hypothesis Fama ) 4) 1 Fig. 1 Utility function. 2 Fig. 2 Value function. (1) (2)


BB 報告書完成版_修正版) doc

untitled

1 Nelson-Siegel Nelson and Siegel(1987) 3 Nelson-Siegel 3 Nelson-Siegel 2 3 Nelson-Siegel 2 Nelson-Siegel Litterman and Scheinkman(199

わが国企業による資金調達方法の選択問題

日本の高齢者世帯の貯蓄行動に関する実証分析

日本の世帯属性別貯蓄率の動向について:アップデートと考察

SNAと家計調査における貯蓄率の乖離-日本の貯蓄率低下の要因-

Autumn II III Zon and Muysken 2005 Zon and Muysken 2005 IV II 障害者への所得移転の経済効果 分析に用いるデータ

autocorrelataion cross-autocorrelataion Lo/MacKinlay [1988, 1990] (A)

,398 4% 017,

Hi-Stat Discussion Paper Series No.248 東京圏における 1990 年代以降の住み替え行動 住宅需要実態調査 を用いた Mixed Logit 分析 小林庸平行武憲史 March 2008 Hitotsubashi University Research Unit

JSPS Grants-in-Aid for Creative Scientific Research Understanding Inflation Dynamics of the Japanese Economy Working Paper Series No.7 日本家計の消費 貯蓄 労働プロ

研修コーナー

パーキンソン病治療ガイドライン2002

橡同居選択における所得の影響(DP原稿).PDF

(2004 ) 2 (A) (B) (C) 3 (1987) (1988) Shimono and Tachibanaki(1985) (2008) , % 2 (1999) (2005) 3 (2005) (2006) (2008)

, 3, 1999, 4,,

取引銀行の破綻が企業経営に及ぼす影響について-阪和銀行破綻の事例分析-

OSIPPニュースレター.indd

中京大学経済学論叢 23 号 2012 年 3 月 審査論文 1 Keywords: JEL Classi cation: L13, L22, L33 1 * *1 Inoue, Kamijo, and Tomaru (2009) Mukherjee and Suestrong

I- Fama-French 3, Idiosyncratic (I- ) I- ( ) 1 I- I- I- 1 I- I- Jensen Fama-French 3 SMB-FL, HML-FL I- Fama-French 3 I- Fama-MacBeth Fama-MacBeth I- S

株式保有構成と企業価値 ─コーポレート・ガバナンスに関する一考察─

税制改正にともなう家計の所得弾性値 : 高齢者パネルデータによる実証分析

, 1), 2) (Markov-Switching Vector Autoregression, MSVAR), 3) 3, ,, , TOPIX, , explosive. 2,.,,,.,, 1

03.Œk’ì

金融政策の波及経路と政策手段

2 Hayek Hayek Hayek Keynes IS

2 (S, C, R, p, q, S, C, ML ) S = {s 1, s 2,..., s n } C = {c 1, c 2,..., c m } n = S m = C R = {r 1, r 2,...} r r 2 C \ p = (p r ) r R q = (q r ) r R


わが国銀行業の将来像― 預金通貨需要からのアプローチによるマクロ的サイズの検討―


DGE DGE (1) ( 1

【表紙】経済学論叢_18号/表1・3・背

復活だぁっ! 日本の不況と流動性トラップの逆襲

時間割引:双曲割引と弱加法性

本邦株式市場の流動性に関する動学的考察―東京証券取引所のティック・データ分析―

LA-VAR Toda- Yamamoto(1995) VAR (Lag Augmented vector autoregressive model LA-VAR ) 2 2 Nordhaus(1975) 3 1 (D2)

untitled

Vol.57 No.4 March 2008 : () 1 () () (1 ) (2 ) ( ) 1 Takagi (1989)Hamao (1992) (1998)

Ishi

2

論文08.indd

23_02.dvi

POS POS JEL Classification Number: E30 Keywords: ; POS ; ; ; 18GS0101

Microsoft Word - Šv”|“Å‘I.DOC


Public Pension and Immigration The Effects of Immigration on Welfare Inequality The immigration of unskilled workers has been analyzed by a considerab

untitled

L Y L( ) Y0.15Y 0.03L 0.01L 6% L=(10.15)Y 108.5Y 6%1 Y y p L ( 19 ) [1990] [1988] 1



物価指数の計測誤差と品質調整手法:わが国CPIからの教訓

Becker 1965 Gronau a a a

2 / 24

スプレッド・オプション評価公式を用いた裁定取引の可能性―電力市場のケース― 藤原 浩一,新関 三希代

Transcription:

2 book conference 1990 2003 14 Repeated Cross-Section Data 1 M1,M2 M1 Sekine(1998) Repeated Cross-Section Data 1

1. (1989), Yoshida and Rasche(1990), Rasche(1990), 19921997, Fujiki and Mulligan(1996), 1996, Sekine(1998), (2001), Fujiki(2002), 2003, (2004) Bahmani-Oskooee and Shabsigh(1996), Amano and Wirjanto(2000), Bahmani-Oskooee (2001), 2001, Nagayasu(2003), Tang (2004) 1989 ECM VECM Fujiki and Mulligan(1996) M2 1.21.4-0.2-0.3 Fujiki(2002) 2004 M1 1.0 0.1 1 Mulligan and Sala-i-Martin(1992)Mankiw (1992) Mulligan and Sala-i-Martin(2000) Attanasio, Guiso and Jappelli(2002) ( ) 1990 2003 14 Repeated Cross-Section Data 2

2 3 M1 Nakashima and Saito(2002)(2004)Miyao(2003) 4 5 2. 13 4 28 1990 2003 14 1) 2 400 15 2 6000 6 7 Repeated Cross-Section Data 1 + M1 M1 M2 2000 CPI 1 M1M2 M1 3

1 1 3. 1 Sample Selection Bias (2) 4

Inverse Mill s Ratio (1) Heckman Sample Selection ln( + M i, t Pt ) = β0 + β R ln( Rt ) + β I ln( Ii, t / Pt ) + β Xj X i, t, j ui, t j (1) α 0 + α R ln( R t ) + α I ln( Ii, t / Pt ) + α Xj X i, t, j + e i, t un(0,σ) en(0,1) corr(u,e)=ρ j 0 (2) 2 M1 2 3 1990 2003 2 1.090.084 1 Fujiki(2002) 2004 M1 Rasche(1990) 1.0 2001 0.922 1 2 M1() 1 5

3 M1() 1 0.084 Rasche(1990)0.5 0.6 (2004) 0.1 20010.135 4 M2() 1 6

5 M2() 1 M2 4 5 4 1.06 Fujiki and Mulligan(1996) 1.2 1.4 Yoshida and Rasche(1990) 1.2 Bahmani-Oskooee(2001) 1.0721.174 1 M2 3 2 5 1998 2) (1)(2) 6 M1 1998 M2 1998 0.054 1998 0 7

6 1 2 M1() * 3 M2() 8

2M1 3M2 M1 0.5 1 95 0 1 M2 6 1 M1 4. 1 80 1988 19921992 1996Sekine(1998) Mankiw 1992 (1)(2) M1 7 0.41 0.096 0.1 M2 9 Sekine(1998) M2+CD 0.4 M1 0.41M2 0.21 Baumol =Tobin 9

7 M1() 2 8 M1() 2 10

9 M2() 2 10 M2() 2 2 1998 11 M1,M2 11

M1 1998 11 2 4 5 M1 M2 6 7 M1 M2 0.8 4 M1() * 12

5 M2() 6 M1() 7 M2() 5. ( ) 1990 2003 14 Fujiki and Mulligan(1996) Repeated Cross-Section Data 1 13

M1,M2 M1 Sekine(1998) M1 M2 1) 1989 2) 1998 7 1998 1996 19928 (2001) 20 1 (2004) 1990 23 3 2001 90 14

Amano, R and T.S. Wirjanto(2000), On the Stability of Long-run M2 Demand in Japan, The Japanese Economic Review Vol.51 No.4, pp.536-542 Attanasio,O.P., L.Guiso and T.Jappelli(2002), The Demand for Money, Financial Innovation and Welfare Cost of Inflation: An Aalysis with Household Data, Journal of Political Economy Vol.110 No.2, pp.317-351 Bahmani-Oskooee,M(2001), How Stable is M2 money demand function in Japan?, Japan and the World Economy13, pp.455-461 Bahmani-Oskooee,M and G. Shabsigh(1996), The Demand for Money in Japan: Evidence from Cointegration Analysis, Japan and the World Economy 8, pp.1-10 Fujiki, H., and C.B.Mulligan(1996), A Structural Analysis of Money Demand: Cross-Sectional Evidence from Japan, Monetary and Economic Studies Vol.14 No.2, pp.53-78 Fujiki, H.(2002), Money Demand near Zero Interest Rate: Evidence from Regional Data, Monetary and Economic Studies 20(2), pp.25-42 Lucas,R.E(2000), Inflation and Welfare, Econometrica, 68(2), pp.247-274 Mankiw,N.G(1992), Comments, Brookings Papers on Economic Activity 2, pp.330-334 Mulligan,C.A and X. Sala-i-Martin(1992) "U.S. monetary demand: surprising cross-sectional estimate", Brookings Papers on Economic Activity 2, pp.285-329 Mulligan,C.A and X. Sala-i-Martin(2000) "Extensive Margins and the Demand for Money at Low Interest Rate ", Journal of Political Economy Vol.108 No.5, pp.962-991 Miyao, R.(2003) Liquidity Traps and the Stability of Monetary Demand: Is Japan Really Trapped at the Zero Bound? mimeo Nagayasu, J(2003), A re-examination of the Japanese Money Demand Function and Structural Shift, Journal of Policy Modeling 25, pp.359-375 Nakashima, K. and M. Saito(2002), Strong Money Demand and Nominal Rigidity: 15

Evidence from the Japanese Money Market under the Low Interest Rate Policy, Discussion Paper No.2001-11, Graduate School of Economics, Hitotsubashi University Rasche,R.H(1990), Equilibrium Income and Interest Elasticities of the Demand for M1 in Japan Monetary and Economic Studies Vol.8 No.2, pp.31-58 Sekine,T(1998), Financial Liberalization, the Wealth Effect, and the Demand for Broad Money in Japan, Monetary and Economic Studies Vol.16 No.1, pp.365-355 Tang, T.C.(2004), Demand for Broad Money and Expenditure Components in Japan: An Empirical Study Japan and the World Economy, forthcoming Yoshida,T. and R.H.Rasche(1990), The M2 Demand in Japan: Shifted and Unstable? Monetary and Economic Studies Vol.8 No.2, pp.9-30. Mulligan and Sala-i-Martin(2000)Attanasio, Guiso and Jappelli(2002) Lucas(2000) = r η W ( r) ( ) ( ) = r η m x dx rm r µ (3) 0 1 η m M1 2 0.72 0.16895%0.0780.263 (2001) GDP 0.3 16