251 1 2, 3 4, 5 2 1 2005 stakeholder agent p.13 2005 2009, 2011, 2012, 2013 b, 2014 Taguchi et al.2013 Aoki2001, 201019962010 2014 2013!
252 2 " " " " 6 " " " " 7 2! 3 p.5 2013 2011201120132012 Aoki20012004 20052006 1997 2012 3 2001 Nakano and Nguyen2012 2010 " " " "
253 8 SOX the 9 Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002J-SOX SOX 404 10 SOX before-after 2013 Patterson and Smith2007 SOX 2013 2013 2013 c annalistic narrative approach2010 the Public Company Accounting Reform and Investor Protection Act of 2002. Schneider et al.2009
254 11 Patterson and Smith2007 12 2 nature θ H D ss0,1 α!0 2 s1 α 0 s α 2 1 e!0 s h h s 1e 2 fhs, e F hs, e h s1 h 1 1 h h 2 xhxh s!! s 13 s 14 e Patterson and Smith200720 23 s s 2013 a 2013 3 Patterson and Smith2007 2013 h
255 s AR SOX 2013 z-tree Treatment 1 Treatment 2 unintended consequences 1 2 1 2013 15 2 16 α s e x AR 2013 6 2013 1419
256 2 2 1 s s 2 α 17 18 2013 h h!! s α 2013 a
257 19 SOX SOX 406 CFO 20 21 Davidson and Stevens 2013Davidson and Stevens2013 trust Berg et al. 1995 22 trust 23 sender receiver Kuang and Moser2009!! DITDefining Issues Test 2012 Davidson and Stevens2013 trust 2012 Davidson and Stevens2013
258 sender receiver sender Berg et al. 1995sender receiver sender 0, receiver 0 Berg et al. 1995 Camerer 2003 sender receiver sender receiver trust Davidson and Stevens2013trust 3 3 Treatment 1 No code trust SOX Treatment 2 Presentreceiver trust senderreceiver Treatment 3 Certified treatment 2 receiver certification sender trust 3 Davidson and Stevens2013 24 Treatment 1 No codesox Treatment 2 Present Treatment 3 Certifiedcertification
259 4 Davidson and Stevens2013 25 Sender Receiver Treatment 2 : Present Treatment 1 Treatment 1 Treatment 3 : Certified Treatment 1 Treatment 1 senderreceiver SOX 406 Davidson and Stevens2013 4 4 2 1 Treatment 3 Certified Davidson and Stevens2013situational cues Davidson and Stevens2013Social norms situational cues cue certification choicesituational cues situational cues SOX 406!!!!!!!!!!
260!!!!!!!!!! 2 Treatment 2 Present PresentNo code Davidson and Stevens2013 treatment 2 no code
261!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! 26 3 1!! 2!! 3!!
262 27!! 3 3 3 20082011, 2013 a2012 1 3 1 3 2 28 2 3 2014 11 2 4 1 1 1 2002 2013
263 1 3 1 3 3 29 5!!!! Carcello et al. 2011 Carcello et al.2011 2012 2013 a
264 3 3 3 2 30 1 2 1 2014 3 20 C25380627 23653118 A24683015 References Aoki, M.2001Towards a Comparative Institutional Analysis, MIT Press2001 NTT Aoki, M. 2010Corporations in Evolving Diversity : Cognition, Governance and Institutions, Oxford University Press.2011NTT 1996 2014 Berg, J., J. Dickhaut, and K. McCabe.1995Trust, reciprocity, and social history. Games and Economic Behavior, 10 : 122 142. Camerer, C. F.2003Behavioral Game Theory, Princeton University Press. Carcello. J. V., D. R. Hermanson, and Z. Ye2011Corporate Governance Research in Accounting and Auditing : Insights, Practice Implications, and Future Research Directions, Auditing : A Journal of Practice & Theory, 3031 31. Davidson and Stevens2013. Can a Code of Ethics Improve Manager Behavior and Investor Confidence? An 2002
265 Experimental Study, The Accounting Review, 88151 74. 1997 2012 2012 2005 2 2010 2011 2004 2012 7 2013 2005 Kuang, Xi. and D. V. Moser2009Reciprocity and the Effectiveness of Optimal Agency Contracts, The Accounting Review, 8451671 1694. 2002 39161 68. 2011 2010 Nakano. M. and P. Nguyen.2012Board Size and Corporate Risk-Taking : Further Evidence from Japan. Corporate Governance : An International Review, 204369 387. 2001 2014 2013 3 33 49. Patterson,E.R.andJ.R.Smith2007. The effects of Sarbanes-Oxley on auditing and internal control strength. The Accounting Review, 832427 455. 201337116 28. Schneider, A., A. A. Gramling, D. R. Hermanson, and Z. Ye.2009. A review of academic literature on internal control reporting under SOX. Journal of Accounting Literature, 28 : 1 46. 2008 2009 61324 46. 2010 1843113 129. 2011 4131 29. 2012 67 15 2012 12 25 32. 2013 a21133 48. 2013 b 65323 58. 2013 c 9 112 124.
266 2014 655195 217. 2012 641140 147. 2013 11 159 190. Taguchi. S., M. Ueeda., K. Miwa., and S. Mizutani.2013Economic Consequences of Global Accounting Convergence : An Experimental Study of a Coordination Game,The Japanese Accounting Review, 3 : 103 120. 2013 2012 6 70 77. 2002 No.58. 2006