Granstrand, Patel & Pavitt, 1997; Oliver, 1997; Teece & Pisano & Shuen, 1997; Cockburn, Henderson & Stern, 2000 RBV SWOT (Strength, Weakness, Opportun

Similar documents
untitled

Microsoft Word - 荳ュ蟲カ諱オ

01_芦澤成光①.indd


中小企業の量的成長と質的成長 Size Growth and Capability Growth by Small Firms 髙橋美樹 (Miki Takahashi) 企業の成長には2つの側面があり 従業員数や資本金 売上高でみた量的な側面と イノベーション創出能力あるいは組織能力でみた質的な側

ÿþbÎW'Yf[

untitled

観光研究論集 第12号/2.中島

Blue Ocean Strategy W. Chan Kim A. Mauborgne INSEAD INSEAD Production and Operations Management PhD Value Innovation Kim & Mauborgne, 1997

_01野口.indd

多国籍企業における企業の境界の理論的視角

導入

untitled

289号/2‐林

Powered by TCPDF ( Title イノベーションと中小 ベンチャー企業 Sub Title Innovation and small entrepreneurial firms Author 高橋, 美樹 (Takahashi, Miki) Publish

ÿþbÎW'Yf[

山田敏之 111‐136/111‐136

第42巻第1号【論説】銀行経営研究序説

4 BRICs Brazil, Russia, India, China VISTA Vietnam, Indonesia, South Africa, Turkey, Argentina BRICs 2009b 2011 competence Sensing competence Rumelt,

2 / 24

本文/AZ204P

Change in Organization Mode and Asymmetric Personal Information via Corporate Group Management Resolution 1 asymmetric information,2003a symmetric ign

untitled

本文/YAZ211K

平成12年度 対日直接投資増加の理由と日本経済にもたらす影響に関する調査 第2章 対日投資と多国籍企業の戦略について


組織の経済学:企業の境界

濱田弘潤 : 多角化企業の利潤分析 77 多角化企業の利潤分析 多角化ディスカウントの寡占理論による説明 * 濱田弘潤 (diversification discount) Keywords: JEL classifications: D43, L13, L22, G

MertonMerton

65-5 足代訓史.pwd

変革型・取引型リーダーシップ -バス・アボリオの所論を中心にして-

商学 66‐2☆/3.大原

知識創造としてのカリキュラム開発

(’Ó)”R

JSAAM02Wv.doc

2

AMJ ASQ (Gibbert, Ruigrok, & Wicki, 2008) Eisenhardt (1989) Eisenhardt 2. Eisenhardt (1989) 2.1. Eisenhardt (1989) Eisenhardt (1989) 2.2. Eisenhardt (

ハイコミットメントモデルの有効性についての考察 

1 (1996), p. 7 (2006), p (2003), p. 2 p (2003), p. 21 (2008), p. 3 (2003), p. 17 B (2003), p. 28 A, A (2004), p. 17 J, A (2004), p. 9 (p.

表紙1

Kobe University Repository : Kernel タイトル Title 著者 Author(s) 掲載誌 巻号 ページ Citation 刊行日 Issue date 資源タイプ Resource Type 版区分 Resource Version 権利 Rights DOI

04長谷川英伸_様.indd

本文/インドネシアとタイ~ 小林 守


小阪玄次郎先生.indd

84 京都マネジメント レビュー 第 4 号 ベルの競争によって規定されると主張し, 企業間競争において資源が果たす役割を強調した.Rumelt は, 企業の内部に存在する 隔離メカニズム (isolating mechanism) の概念によって, 競争優位が持続するプロセスを説明した. その後,

21世紀紀要12号.indb

SFCJ6-松本

佐野先生投影資料

商業学会発表資料( ).ppt

博士論文 第一次審査 2008/11/26

JAPAN MARKETING JOURNAL 114 Vol.29 No.22009

<4D F736F F D B78AFA91B691B18AE98BC682A982E78A7782D490568B4B8E968BC6916E91A22E646F6378>

⑥香取 徹.indd

⑥宮脇論 123~229○/宮脇先生

untitled

社会システム研究21_ 畠山.indd

untitled

28 Drucker,1999: Davenport,2005: Frorida, 2005 Arthur and Rousseau (1996) Boundaryless Career Hall (2002) Protean Career 14


「リストラ中高年」の行方


honbun

戦間期日本企業の資金調達、資本コスト、資本構成:最適資本構成理論からみた1930年代における企業財務


デフレ不況下の金融政策をめぐる政治過程

<90AD8DF489C88A D322E696E6462>

時間割引:双曲割引と弱加法性

IMF World Economic Outlook, April GDP GDP.,,,,,..,.

NPM NPM NPM Modified Grounded Theory Approach: M-GTA

金/金

評論・社会科学 121号(P)☆/1.中井

村本 孜71‐89/71‐89


商学 64‐5☆/21.太田原

Powered by TCPDF ( Title ホビー市場における消費者行動と社会的相互作用 Sub Title Buyer behavior and social interactions in hobby markets Author 小野, 晃典 (Ono, Ak

マーケティング・チャネル研究における協調関係論の再検討

第45巻第4号【論説】資源ベースの戦略論における競争優位の源泉と企業家の役割

Article The Concerns and the Effects about Telework From the Results of Questionnaire Method Yasuhiro Furukawa In this study, I researched the current

20,


管理会計によるインタンジブルズ管理のアプローチ

海保英孝223‐241/223‐241


社会学部紀要 121号/1.藤沢

SEJulyMs更新V7

39-3/2.論説:藤井・戸前・山本・井上

, 3 2 Marshall [1890]1920, Marshall [1890]1920

52 Stringer 3 E. B. Taylor Hofstede (1997) (1991)O Reilly et. al (1991)Payne & Phersey (1971) Litwin & Stringer (1974)Likert (1967) 16 1

_fi¿“]

5 5 5 Barnes et al

JAPAN MARKETING JOURNAL 117 Vol.30 No.12010

商学 63‐1・2☆/5.冨田

(EHChamberlin) (ESMason) (JSBain) (RECaves) (CKaysen) (DFTurner) (FMScherer) (1) - (2) (1) (Structure) (2) (Conduct) (3) (Performance) (S

37_02_三田・栗田・マウラー02.indd

Copyright ' 2001 by Manabu Masuoka i

JAPAN MARKETING JOURNAL 116 Vol.29 No.42010

JR TESSEI JR JR

32 constructivism Rawls 1971, pp. 137, 158 Rawls 1971, pp Dworkin 2000, p Cohen 1989, p. 931 option luck neutralization Dworkin 200

公的・非営利組織の人的資源マネジメント戦略:

Transcription:

Resource Based V iew Barney, 1986, 1991, 1996, 2001; Castanias & Helfat, 1991; Hall, 1992; Mahoney & Pandian, 1992; Amit & Schoemaker, 1993; Peteraf, 1993; Black & Boal, 1994; Collis, 1994; Schendel, 1994; Montgomery, 1995; Foss & Knudesn, 1996; Heene & Sanchez, 1997 Resource Based V iew RBV Snow & Hrebiniak, 1980; Wernerfelt, 1984; Hitt & Ireland, 1985; resource competence Chiristensen (1996) Competence Based V iew RBV

Granstrand, Patel & Pavitt, 1997; Oliver, 1997; Teece & Pisano & Shuen, 1997; Cockburn, Henderson & Stern, 2000 RBV SWOT (Strength, Weakness, Opportunities, and Threats) SW Strength Weakness RBV RBV RBV RBV RBV Selznick RBV RBV Selznick 1957 Snow & Hrebiniak, 1980; Conner, 1991; Mahoney & Pandian, 1992; Foss & Knudesn, 1996 Selznick Leadership in administration. distinctive competence Hofer & Schendel

Selznick, Selznick character Selznick, RBV Barney, Selznick routine Selznick, TVA Tennessee V alley Authority Selznick, institutionalism Selznick Powell & DiMaggio, 1991; Scott, 1995; Scott & Christensen, 1995

Powell & DiMaggio, 1991; Scott, 1995; Scott & Christensen, 1995 Oliver RBV Selznick Penrose RBV Selznick RBV KnudsenRBV Adam Smith Charles Babbage Selznick RBV Penrose Montgomery, 1995; Oliver, 1997; Teece & Pisano & Shuen, 1997 Penrose The theory of the growth of the firm RBV Penrose,

administrative organizationpenrose, Penrose discipline firm as a collection of productive resources Penrose, Penrose, Penrose, Penrose, Penrose RBV Penrose Penrose, RBV management team

Penrose Penrose, RBV SWOT OT strategic position SW RBV heterogeneitypenrose, RBV Barney, 1991; Mahoney & Pandian, 1992; Peteraf, 1993 organizational slack Penrose discrete Penrose

RBV Nelson & Winter RBV evolutionary theory Nelson & Winter Penrose orthodox RBV routine Nelson & Winter, Simon, Daft, Nelson & Winter, Nelson & Nelson & Winter

Winter, Nelson & Winter, operation characteristics capital stock Nelson & Winter Simon Selznick Nelson & Winter

skillnelson & Winter, tacit knowledge Nelson & Winter, organizational memory Nelson & Winter Penrose

Wernerfelt RBV Selznick, Penrose, Nelson & Winter RBV Wernerfelt RBV Schendel, 1994; Knudsen, 1996 SWOT Wernerfelt Penrose Wernerfelt, Wernerfelt, resource position barriers exploitation RBV

Wernerfelt Wernerfelt, Intel Microsoft availability of substitute resources first mover advantage Wernerfelt, Wernerfelt, Wernerfelt, Barney

Wernerfelt Wernerfelt Wernerfelt RBV RBV RBV RBV Wernerfelt 1984 Wernerfelt attractiveness RBV iii

RBV RBV Mahoney & Pandian, 1992; Amit & Shoemaker, 1993; Knudsen, 1996 SWOT

Lev RBV

RBV Barney RBV Wernerfelt RBV BarneyPeteraf, 1993; Schendel, 1994; Knudsen, 1996 homogeneousmobile Barney, Barney Barney, mobility

barriers immobile Barney Barney, valuable rare imperfectly imitable Barney, RBV immobile

Barney causal ambiguity social complexity Barney, Barney Barney Barney

Barney, Barney RBV RBV Rumelt RBV RumeltRBV Barney, 1986, 1991, 1996, 2001; Castanias & Helfat, 1991; Amit & Schoemaker, 1993Rumelt Penrose, Nelson & W inter Rumelt, RBV Barney Rumelt RBV Rumelt exploited by organization Barney

Rumelt, RBV Rumelt isolating mechanism entry barrier Porter & Caves mobility barrier Rumelt, Barney Rumelt, Rumelt team- embedded skills Rumelt, RBV RBV

Chandler RBV Chandler RBV Strategy and structure Chandler, RBV RBV Scale and scope RBV organizational capabilities Scale, scope, and organizational capabilities Chandler Chandler, organized human capabilities Chandler

Chandler RBV 1990; Nonaka & Takeuchi, 1995; von Krogh, Ichijo & Nonaka, 2000RBV RBV Nonaka & Takeuchi, RBV RBV RBV RBV RBV RBV

RBV discipline RBV RBV Barney, ; RBV RBV RBV RBV Snow & Hrebiniak, 1980; Wernerfelt, 1984; Hitt & Ireland, 1985; Oliver, 1997; Teece & Pisano & Shuen, 1997 RBV

RBV Selznick Penrose, Nelson & W inter theory of the firm Nelson, 1991; Conner & Prahalad, 1996; Foss, Conner Conner, Penrose Nelson & Winter RBV Rumelt, 1984; Nelson, 1991 Conner nexus of contractsaoki, Gustafsson & Williamson, Penrose Nelson & Winter Coase

RBV Montgomery, Selznick, Penrose Nelson & Winter Selznick RBV Penrose Nelson & Winter RBV RBV RBV RBV RBV SWOT RBV

Wernerfelt, Barney Rumelt

RBV Kuhn Kuhn, RBV Priem & Butler RBV RBV Priem & ButlerRBV viewporter

IC V ol. 57 No. 3, Amit, R., & Schoemaker, P. J. H. 1993. Strategic assets and organizational rent. Strategic Management Journal, 14: 33 46. Aoki, M., Gustafsson, B. & Williamson, O.E. (Eds.). 1990. Thefirmasanexusoftreaties. London: Sage. Barney, J. B. 1986. Organizational culture: Can it be a source of sustained competitive advantage? Academy of Management Review, 11: 656 665. Barney, J. 1991. Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 17: 99 120. Barney, J. B. 1996. The resource- based theory of the firm. Organization Science, 7: 469. Barney, J. B. 2001. Is the resource- based view a useful perspective for strategic management research? Yes. Academy of Management Review, 26: 41 56. Barney, J. B. 2002. Gaining and sustaining competitive advantage (2nd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice- Hall. Black, J. A., & Boal, K. B. 1994. Strategic resources: Traits, configurations and paths to sustainable competitive advantage. Strategic Management Journal, 15: 131 148. Castanias, R. P., & Helfat, C. E. 1991. Managerial resources and rents. Journal of Management, 17: 155 171. Chandler, Jr., A. D. 1962. Strategy and structure. Cambridge, MA: M.I.T. Press. Chandler, Jr., A. D. 1990. Scale and scope. Cambridge, MA: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press. Christensen, J. F. 1996. Analysing the technology base of the firm. In N. J. Foss & C. Knudsen (Eds.), T oward a competence theory of the firm: 111 132. London: Routledge. Cockburn, I. M., Henderson, R. M., & Stern, S. 2000. Untangling the origin of competitive advantage. Strategic Management Journal, 21: 1123 1145. Collis, D. J. 1994. Research note: How valuable are organizational capabilities? Strategic Management Journal, 15: 143 152. Conner, K. R. 1991. A historical comparison of resource- based theory and five schools of thought within industrial organizational economics: Do we have a new theory of the firm? Journal of Management, 17: 121 154. Conner, K. R., & Prahalad, C. K. 1996. A resource- based theory of the firm: Knowledge versus opportunism. Organization Science,7:477 501. Daft, R. L. 1992. Organization theory and design (4th ed.). St. Paul, MN: West Publishing. Foss, N. J. 1996. Knowledge- based approaches to the theory of the firm: Some critical comments. Organization Science,7:470 476. Foss, N. J., & Knudesn, C. (Eds.). 1996. Towards a competence theory of the firm. London: Routledge. Granstrand, O., Patel, P., & Pavitt, K. 1997. Multi- technology corporations: Why they have

distributed rather than distinctive core competencies. California Management Review, 39(4): 8 25. Hall, R. 1992. The strategic analysis of intangible resources. Strategic Management Journal, 13: 135 144. Heene, A., & Sanchez, R. (Eds.). 1997. Competence-based strategic management. Chichester, England: John Wiley & Sons. Hitt, M. A., & Ireland, R. D. 1985. Corporate distinctive competence, strategy, industry and performance. Strategic Management Journal,6:273 293. Hofer, C. W., & Schendel, D. 1978. Strategy formulation: Analytical concepts. St. Paul, MN: West Publishing. Itami, H., & Roehl, T. W. 1987. Mobilizing invisible assets. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. King, A. W., Zeithaml, C. P. 2001. Competencies and firm performance: Examining the causal ambiguity paradox. Strategic Management Journal, 22: 75 99. Knudsen, C. 1996. The competence perspective: A historical view. In N. J. Foss & C. Knudsen (Eds.), T oward a competence theory of the firm:13 37. London: Routledge. Kuhn, T.S. 1962. The structure of scientific revolutions. The Chicago University Press. Lev, B. 2001. Intangibles. Washington, D. C.: Brooking Institution Press. Mahoney, J. T., & Pandian, J. R. 1992. The resource- based view within the conversation of strategic management. Strategic Management Journal, 13: 363 380. Montgomery, C. A. (Ed.). 1995. Resource-based and evolutionary theories of the firm. Norwell, MA: Kluwer Academic Publishers. Nelson, R. R. & Winter, S.G. 1982. An evolutionary theory of economic change. Cambridge, MA: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press. Nelson, R. R. 1991. Why do firms differ, and how much does it matter? Strategic Management Journal, 12 (Special issue): 61 74. Nonaka, I. & Takeuchi, H. 1995. The knowledge-creating company. Oxford University Press. Oliver, C. 1997. Sustainable competitive advantage: Combining institutional and resource- based views. Strategic Management Journal, 18: 697 713. Penrose, E. 1995. The theory of the growth of the firm (3rd ed.). Oxford, England: Oxford University Press. Peteraf, M. A. 1993. The cornerstones of competitive advantage: A resource- based view. Strategic Management Journal, 14: 179 191. Powell, W. W., & DiMaggio, P. J. (Eds.). 1991. The new institutionalism in organizational analysis. Chicago, Il: The University of Chicago Press. Priem, R. L., & Butler, J. E. 2001. Is the resource- based view a useful perspective for strategic management research? Academy of Management Review, 26: 22 40. Priem, R. L., & Butler, J. E. 2001. Tautology in the resource- based view and the implications of externally determined resource value: Further comments. Academy of Management Review, 26: 57 66. Rumelt, R.P. 1984. Towards a strategic theory of the firm. In R. B. Lamb (Ed.), Competitive strategic management: 556 570. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice- Hall. Schendel, D. 1994. Introduction to 'competitive organizational behavior: Toward an organizationally?

based theory of competitive advantage. Strategic Management Journal, 15: 1 4. Scott, W.R. 1995. Institutions and organizations. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. Scott, W. R., & Christensen, S. (Eds.). 1995. The institutional construction of organizations. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. Selznick, P. 1957. Leadership in administration.evanston,il:row,petersonandcompany. Simon, H. A. 1976. Administrative behavior (3rd ed.). New York: Free Press. Simon, H.A. 1977. The new science of management decision. (Revised ed.). Prentice- Hall. Snow, C. C., & Hrebiniak, L. G. 1980. Strategy, distinctive competence, and organizational performance. Administrative Science Quarterly, 25: 317 336. Teece, D. J., Pisano, G., & Shuen, A. 1997. Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strategic Management Journal, 18: 509 533. V on Krogh, G., Ichijo, K., & Nonaka, I. 2000. Enabling knowledge creation. Oxford University Pres. Wernerfelt, B. 1984. A resource- based view of the firm. Strategic Management Journal,5:171 180.