Page 1

Similar documents
1. interlanguage 1970 (phonology) morphology syntax Hymes 1972 (communicative competence) Interlanguage Pragmatics Blum- Kulka, House, & Kasper, 1989

2

02’ÓŠ¹/“Hfi¡

NO95-1_62173.pdf


駒田朋子.indd

English for Specific Purposes

人文研究第128輯

<30355F936391BA8E8182D982A92E696E6464>

ナ畜ナ・カ (窶凖・

10_村井元_0227.indd

untitled

Maynard Zimmerman Maynard & Zimmerman Maynard & Zimmerman Maynard & Zimmerman

P

h education/educating teaching indoctrination reasonable teaching education teaching education teaching education teaching

pp a p p. 6 45

本文/YAZ325T

language anxiety :, language-skill-specific anxiety Cheng, Horwitz, & Schallert, Horwitz et al. Foreign Language Classroom Anxiety ScaleFLCAS Young, ;



Ellis 1970 Oxford (1990) SILL(Strategy Inventory for Language Learning) (Rubin, 1975; Naiman, Fröhlich, Stern, & Todesco, 1978)Rubin(1975) verbal-repo

【教】⑩山森直人先生【本文】/【教】⑩山森直人先生【本文】

1986 NHK NTT NTT CONTENTS SNS School of Information and Communi

09‘o’–

11_寄稿論文_李_再校.mcd


橡LET.PDF


1 2 Japanese society and for implementation into its education system for the first time. Since then, there has been about 135 years of the history of

P

MacIntyre & Gardner 1994) Horwitz, E.K Trait Anxiety State AnxietySituation Specific Anxiety 77

本文H21.4.indd

HP HP ELF 7 52

情意要因が英語の読解力と会話力に及ぼす影響-JGSS-2008 のデータから-

< D906C95B639352D8BF E954690E690B D5A CC8F898D5A816A2E706466>

Grice (1957) S x p S A x 1. A p 2. A S 1 3. A S 1 p (intention-based semantics) S p x (Strawson 1964; Grice 1969; Schiffer 1972; Harman 1974; Bennett

37_02_三田・栗田・マウラー02.indd

農村生活改善大扉2002.5.1.PDF

% 95% 2002, 2004, Dunkel 1986, p.100 1

(’Ó)”R

実践的コミュニケーション能力を




日本語と英語の読解方略使用の比較



untitled

) Good Morning 4 In the Autumn Forest b a 3)

08教育内容開発コース 2014.indd

/ p p

スライド 1

A Study on Interruptions in the Conversations: To Demonstrate the Features of the Conver sation between Japanese Native Speakers and Chinese Japanese

33 (2016), 105 Abstract Keywords CAP Vol. 9 ( ) pp : : : :

日本語教育紀要 7/pdf用 表紙

L3 Japanese (90570) 2008

58 1 Labov (1972) narrative (temporal juncture) (narrative clause) narrative Labov (1972) narrative Labov and Waletzkey (1967) narrative q Abstractw O

07_伊藤由香_様.indd

JGSS-2010による早期英語教育に関する意識調査

はじめに



untitled

.N..

05_小田眞幸 様.indd

日本語教育紀要8/pdf用表紙

<30362D906C95B638312D9B9A9271E7E92D93FA967B8CEA8A778F4B8ED282CC91E693F18CBE8CEA8F4B93BE82C68A778F4B B2E706466>

09-泉 fm

A pp CALL College Life CD-ROM Development of CD-ROM English Teaching Materials, College Life Series, for Improving English Communica

07 mokuroku final.indd

IPSJ SIG Technical Report Vol.2014-CLE-12 No /1/31 EFL 1,a) 1 EFL(English as a Foreign Language) EFL 1. [1] EFL (English as a Foreign Language)

外国語教育センタージャーナル第9号

【CG ESL】電子パンフレット

(12th) R.s!..

PowerPoint プレゼンテーション

本文.indd

When creating an interactive case scenario of a problem that may occur in the educational field, it becomes especially difficult to assume a clear obj

fi„‚å-‰³‹ç−w„¤‰ƒ‰IŠv48Ł\1-4.ai


/™Z‚å‰IŠv‚æ36“ƒ /fi¡„´“NŠm†€


The Way We Are no TJF 5 5 TJF

パーソナリティ研究 2005 第13巻 第2号 170–182

.N..

56 56 The Development of Preschool Children s Views About Conflict Resolution With Peers : Diversity of changes from five-year-olds to six-year-olds Y

Elmore & Pohlmann Greenwood & Ramagli a b c a b c

1. 緒言 p 問題の所在 ) p

05_藤田先生_責

e.g. Kubota 2011 Piller & Takahashi 2006 Kubota 2011 Piller & Takahashi 2006 Kubota 2011 Piller et al Heller 2003 Piller, Takahashi & Watanabe

- June 0 0


Toward More Active Classsroom Interaction A Consideration of Implementing Learner-centered Group Work in Class TAKAHASHI Toshio All teachers desire to

12 MM NEWS No a. b.

仏大 社会学部論集47号(P)/6.山口

Japanese Journal of Applied Psychology

p.14 p.14 p.17 1 p レッテル貼り文 2015: PC 20 p : PC 4

_09名嶋.indd

300, , : 1

外国語教育/斎藤

) 2) , , ) 1 2 Q1 / Q2 Q Q4 /// Q5 Q6 3,4 Q7 5, Q8 HP Q9 Q10 13 Q11

Transcription:

Page 1

Collaborative Learning Through a Small-Group Discussion In EFL Writing Class Keywords: Discussion, Writing, Collaborative Learning, Brainstorming, Second Language Prewriting Discussion L2 Collaborative Learning e.g., Meyer, 1980; Sweigart, 1991L2 FL e.g., Bossio, 1993; Shi, 1996, 1998 L1 Peer Review e.g., Gere & Abbott, 1985 e.g., Berkenkotter, 1984 Page 2

L2 FL L1 Lockhart and Ng (1995) Rothschild & Kilingenberg, 1990 Shi1996, 1998 L1 L2FL Shi1996, 1998 Shi Speech Act Theory (Austin, 1962) Appendix A (1) Brainstorm Page 3

(2) Page 4

B C Appendix C IISO (Solicited opinion statements) [] IIUO (Unsolicited opinion statements) [ ] B IYI (Interpretation) [ ] IYI (Interpretation) [ ] C IYNF YYC YYO A A Content OrganizationProcedure Content 1073 Organization 529 Procedure 147 IIUO 75 B IIUO 248 B 51 B C IYI IINFIYCH B A A YYC YYCCYYO Page 5

B C B IYI C B A B D A A 14 (1) (2) (3) (4) A A A 88 307 YYO A A A A A IIUO B21 17 B B B 139 682 IIUO Page 6

IYIIINF IYCH B B 9 99 B 20 7 C17 18 1 (1) C 149 512 C A B 11 IIUO 27 106 B IYI 14 48 B 11 3 YYC 2 5 YYO A 12 33 6 28 C 6 91 B 5 27 A C IYI21 D20 18 (1) D D D 59 248 IIUO15 68 IYI4 10 YYO3 8 IISO4 48 IIUO2 25 A C YYO2 13 A C D Page 7

Hamp-Lyons Scale (1) Communciative Quality (2) Organization(3) Argumentation(4) Linguistic Accuracy(5) Linguistic Appropriacy (5) Austin, J. (1962). How to do things with words. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Berkenkotter, C. (1984). Student writers and their sense of authority over text. College Composition and Communication, 35, 312-319. Bossio, E. (1993). ESL writing under conditions of reading, group discussion and solitary composing. Unpublished Master s thesis. University of Toronto, Ontario, Canada. Gere, A., & Abbott, R. (1985). Talking about writing: The language of writing groups. Research in the Teaching of English, 19, 362-385. Hamp-Lyons, L. (1991). Reconstructing Academic writing proficiency. In L. Hamp- Page 8

Lyons (Ed.), Assessing second language writing in academic contexts (pp. 127-153). Norwood, NJ: Ablex. Lockhart, C., & Ng, P. (1995). Analyzing talk in ESL peer response groups: Stances, functions, and content. Language Learning, 45, 605-655. Meyer, G. (1980). Speaking as a pre-writing activity: Its application to teaching community college freshman composition pupils. ERIC ED 185 585. Rothschild, D., & Kilingenberg, R. (1990). Self and peer evaluation of writing in the interactive ESL classroom: An exploratory study. TESL Canada Journal, 8, 52-65. Shi, L. (1996). Toward a recursive discourse: Dynamics of talking to write in adult ESL classes. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. University of Toronto, Ontario, Canada. Shi, L. (1998). Negotiated interaction in teacher-led versus peer group adult ESL discussions. TESL Canada Journal, 16, 54-74. Sweigart, W. (1991). Classroom talk, knowledge development, and writing. Research in the Teaching of English, 25, 460-496. Page 9

Page 10

A B C D 4 4 4 5 4 5 6 4 4 4 5 6 5 5 5 5 3 3 4 5 4 4 5 4 3 3 4 5 4 4 4 5 14 14 17 21 17 18 20 18 Note. Page 11

IISO (Solicited Opinion Statements) IIUO (Unsolicited Opinion Statements) Page 12

IY I (Interpretation)IYNF (Negative Feedback) YYC (Clarification Requests) YYO (Opinion Requests) Page 13

IISO (Solicited Opinion Statements) IIUO (Unsolicited Opinion Statements) III (Self-imagination) Page 14

IY I (Interpretation)IYNF (Negative Feedback)IYS (Supposition) IYCH (Challenging Remarks) Page 15

YYC (Clarification Requests) YYCC (Confirmation Checks) YYO (Opinion Requests) Page 16

IISO (Solicited Opinion Statements) IIUO (Unsolicited Opinion Statements) Page 17

IY I (Interpretation) IYNF (Negative Feedback) Page 18

YYC (Clarification Requests) YYCC (Confirmation Checks) YYO (Opinion Requests) Page 19

IISO (Solicited Opinion Statements)IIUO (Unsolicited Opinion Statements) YYO (Opinion Requests) Page 20

Appendix 1: Shi (1996) Content (C)what to write Organization (O)how to write Procedure (P) A. First Person Self-Reflection: What I think I think [II] (1)Solicited opinion statements (IISO) (2)Unsolicited opinion statements (IIUO) (3)Self-repetition (IIR) (4)Self-assurance (IIA) (5)Self-correction (IICR) (6)Self-imagination (III) B. First Person Mutual-Reflection: What I think you think [IY] (7)Other-repetition (IYR) (8)Other-completion (IYC) (9)Other-correction (IYCR) (10)Interpretation (IYI) (11)Supposition (IYS) (12)Affirmative feedback (IYAF) (13)Background feedback (IYBF) (14)Negative feedback (IYNF) Page 21

(15)Challenging remarks (IYCH) C. First Person Other-Reflection: What I think he/she/it thinks [IYH] (16)Referent (ISHR) (17)Topic writer (ISHT) D. Second Person Self-Reflection: What you think I think [YI] (18)Misunderstanding remarks (YIM) (19)Comprehension checks (YIC) (20)Feedback requests (YIF) E. Second Person Mutual-Reflection: What you think you think [YY] (21)Clarification requests (YYC) (22)Confirmation checks (YYCC) (23)Opinion requests (YYO) (24)Completion requests (YYCR) Page 22

Page 23 Appendix 2: Hamp-Lyons 1 2 3 4 5 6 topic sentence supporting detail 7 8 9

Appendix Note. Solicited opinion statements (IISO); Unsolicited opinion statements (IIUO); Selfrepetition (IIR); Self-assurance (IIA); Self-correction (IICR); Self-imagination (III); Otherrepetition (IYR); Other-completion (IYC); Interpretation (IYI); Supposition (IYS); Affirmative feedback (IYAF); Background feedback (IYBF); Negative feedback (IYNF); Challenging remarks (IYCH); Referent (ISHR); Topic writer (ISHT); Misunderstanding remarks (YIM); Comprehension checks (YIC); Clarification requests (YYC); Confirmation checks (YYCC); Opinion requests (YYO); Completion requests (YYCR); False start (FS); UID (Unidentified) Page 24