2013 24 3 337 347 母子間の漸成発達主題獲得の関連性が青年のアイデンティティ達成に及ぼす影響 104 21 83 1 2 3 4 キーワード 漸成発達, 母子間の関連性, アイデンティティ 問題と目的 Erikson 1959/2011 2000; Lerner & Busch-Rossnagle, 1981; Newman & Newman, 2005 Erikson Erikson 8 1 1 3 Erikson 1959/2011 2 Kacerguis & Adams, 1980; Marcia, 1976; Tesch & Whitbourne, 1982 2 1 2003 2010 2007; 2000 Sperling 1994
338 24 3 Erikson 1959/2011 pp.60 61 Erikson 1959/2011 p.73 2 Erikson 1959/2011 Kroger, 2000/2005 Rice 1992 2007; 2008 3 2 Erikson 1959/2011 4 方法 調査用尺度 Erikson Darling-Fisher & Leidy, 1988; Domino & Affonso, 1990; Rasmussen, 1964; 2001
339 Ochse & Plug 1986 Erikson Erikson and Social Desirability Scale 2003 the simplified version of Oche & Plug s Erikson and Social-Desirability scale, S-ESDS S-ESDS S-ESDS 7 7 56 1 =2 =3 =4 4 調査対象者 手続き 2 B4 B4 3 2 2 324 107 3 104 21 83 19.51 SD 2.17 49.54 SD 4.64 2.06 SD.67 統計パッケージ SPSS18.0 for Windows 結果 S-ESDS の検討 S-ESDS Ochse & Plug 1986 2003 1 Table 1 α.81.70 S-ESDS 青年群と母親群の S-ESDS の記述統計量及び t 検定の結果 S-ESDS t Table 2 t 102 = 2.05, p <.01; t 102 = 3.71, p <.01; t 102 = 2.50, p <.05; t 102 = 2.74, p <.01 t 102 = 3.79, p <.01 t 102 = 3.25, p <.01Ochse & Plug 1986 S-ESDS t 青年群及び母親群の S-ESDS の各下位尺度間の相関 S-ESDS Table 3
340 24 3 Table 1 S ESDS 1 α =.74 α =.77.46.21.69.48 R.69.48.48.23 R.70.48.66.44.53.28.72.52 R.57.32.62.38.69.48.71.50.74.55.63.40 40.00 42,14 α =.81 α =.78 R.77.53.71.50 R.70.49.76.58 R.73.53.81.66 R.74.55.72.52 R.49.24.70.49.38.14.54.29.41.17.38.14 37.86 45.43 α =.73 α =.72.51.26.61.37.76.58.66.44.78.61.49.24.63.40.74.55.51.26.53.28.54.29.74.55.62.38.53.28 39.70 38.71 α =.71 α =.73.48.23.59.35 R.64.41.60.36 R.60.36.55.30 R.78.61.74.55 R.67.45.74.55.80.64.62.38.70.49.47.22 45.58 38.71 r =.18, p <.10 r =.19, p <.10 1 青年群と母親群の間の相関分析結果 S-ESDS Table 4
341 Table1 S ESDS 2 α =.78 α =.80 R.67.45.79.62.53.28.75.56.46.21.41.17 R.41.17.80.64 R.66.44.77.59 R.73.53.65.42 R.55.30.80.64 34.00 51.86 α =.77 α =.76 R.81.66.86.74.53.28.41.17 R.65.42.81.66.52.27.43.18 R.68.46.86.74 R.60.36.63.40.62.38.54.29 40.43 45.43 α =.70 α =.75 R.54.29.87.75, R.67.45.56.31.55.30.49.24.48.23.36.13 R.63.40.86.74.74.55.45.20.57.32.55.30 36.29 38.29 α =.79 α =.80.69.47.72.52 R.77.59.78.61 R.68.46.73.54 R.43.18.52.27.70.49.66.44 R.70.49.71.50 R.53.28.42.18 42.29 43.43 R r =.25, p <.05 r =.32, p <.01; r =.22, p <.05; r =.26, p <.05; r =.24, p <.05 r =.21, p <.05 r =.25, p <.05; r =.23, p <.05
342 24 3 Table 2 S ESDS t Mean SD Mean SD t 18.05 2.92 18.87 2.67 2.05** 16.20 3.71 18.11 3.49 3.71** 18.75 3.63 16.97 2.89 3.79** 17.92 3.61 17.49 3.08.89 17.46 3.15 18.65 3.47 2.50* 20.70 3.45 20.42 3.48.58 17.48 3.54 18.61 2.74 2.74** 17.35 2.45 18.52 2.16 3.25** *p <.05 **p <.01 Table 3 S ESDS 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 1.51**.31**.54**.54**.49**.63** 2.36**.19.68**.72**.63**.51** 3.26*.44**.50**.30**.21**.30** 4.46**.68**.70**.67**.57**.61** 5.61**.49**.33**.54**.74**.67** 6.48**.38**.18.36**.49**.60** 7.59**.21*.28**.45**.53**.35** p <.10 *p <.05 **p <.01 Table 4 S ESDS 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 1.25*.17.02.04.25*.15.14 2.32**.21*.03.13.23*.13.09 3.01.19.05.05.14.07.06 4.20.09.15.03.14.12.06 5.22*.03.06.04.07.05.06 6.26*.03.06.04.15.11.01 7.24*.08.01.03.01.08.05 *p <.05 **p <.01 母親群の主題の獲得と青年群の アイデンティティ達成 との関連 Table 4 r =.25, p <.05; r =.23, p <.05 3
343 R 2 =.05 R 2 =.44 R 2 =.03 χ 2, 2 N=104 = 1.14, p =.57, CFI = 1.00, RMSEA =.00 Figure 1 10 母親の主題の獲得と青年の アイデンティティ達成 との関係プロセスについての検討 4 Figure 1 χ 2, 2 N =104 =1.14, p =.57, CFI=1.00, RMSEA=.00 β =.23, p <.05 β =.19, p <.10 β =.49, p <.05 β =.30, p <.05 β =.09, n.s.; β =.07, n.s. 2 2 Baron & Kenny, 1986 4 考察 1 2 3 4 1. 青年群と母親群の各主題の獲得状況の比較 t
344 24 3 1995 Jung, 1969 2005 183 2010 10 9.42010 Fadjukoff Pulkkinen 2006 Waterman, 1982 Erikson 1959/2011 2. 各主題間の相互関連 7 1 Erikson Erikson, 1959/2011 Jacobson 1964/1981 3. 母子間の主題の獲得状況の関連性と青年の アイデンティティ達成 との関係 2 2 2 2
345 3 4 Erikson 1 2 3 1990 Akers, Jones, & Coyl, 1998; Coleman, 1974 今後の課題 2
346 24 3 文献 Akers, J.F., Jones, R.M., & Coyl, D.D. 1988. Adolescent friendship pairs: Similarities in identity status development, behaviors, attitudes, and intentions. Journal of Adolescent Research, 13, 178 199. Baron, R.M., & Kenny, D.A. 1986. The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1173 1182. Coleman, J.C. 1974. Relationship in adolescence. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul. Darling-Fisher, C., & Leidy, N.K. 1988. Measuring Eriksonian development in the adult: The Modified Erikson s Psychosocial Stage Inventory. Psychological Reports, 62, 747 754. Domino, G., & Affonso, D.D. 1990. A personality measure of Erikson s life stages: The inventory of psychosocial balance. Journal of Personality Assessment, 54, 576 588. Erikson, E.H. 2011.,.. Erikson, E.H. 1959, 1980. Identity and the life cycle. New York: International Universities Press/New York: W.W. Norton & Company. Fadjukoff, P., & Pulkkinen, L. 2006. Identity formation, personal control over development, and well-being. In L. Pulkkinen, J. Kaprio, & R.J. Rose Eds., Socioemotional development and health from adolescence to adulthood pp.265-285. New York: Cambridge University Press.. 2000.., 14, 41 59. Jacobson, E. 1981.,.. Jacobson, E. 1964. The self and the object world. New York: International Universities Press. Jung, C.G. 1969. The structure of the psyche. In The collected works of C.G. Jung: Vol.8. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. Original work published 1931 Kacerguis, M.S., & Adams, G.R. 1980. Erikson stage resolution: The relationship between identity and intimacy. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 9, 117 126.. 2007.., 78, 398 406.. 2000.., 48, 323 332. 2010... http://www.mhlw.go.jp/topics/2010/01/tp0127-2/12. html2012 4 1 19 34 Kroger, J. 2005.,.. Kroger, J. 2000. Identity development: Adolescence through adulthood. Thousand Oaks, CA : Sage Publications. Lerner, R.M., & Busch-Rossnagel, N. 1981. Individuals as producers of their development: Conceptual and empirical bases. In R.M. Lerner & N.A. Busch-Rossnagel Eds., Individuals as producers of their development: A life-span perspective pp.1 36. New York: Academic Press. Marcia, J.E. 1976. Identity six years after: A follow-up study. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 5, 145 150.. 2003. Ochse & Plug Erikson and Social-Desirability Scale S-ESDS., 45, 65 76 Newman, B., & Newman, P. 2005. Development through life: A psychosocial approach 9th ed.. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth Publishing.. 1990... Ochse, R., & Plug, C. 1986. Cross-cultural investigation of the validity of Erikson s theory of personality development. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50, 1240
347 1252.. 2008.., pp.103 132... 1995.., 5 pp.41 80.. Rasmussen, J.E. 1964. The relationship of ego identity to psychosocial effectiveness. Psychological Reports, 15, 815 825. Rice, F.P. 1992. The adolescent: Development, relationships, and culture. Boston: Allyn & Bacon. Sperling, M. 1994. The major neuroses and behavior disorders in children 2nd ed.. Northvale, NJ: Jason Aronson.. 2001. MEIS., 49, 265 273. Tesch, S.A., & Whitbourne, S.K. 1982. Intimacy and identity status in young adults. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 43, 1041 1051.. 2009.,., 23, 12 22. Waterman, A.S. 1982. Identity development from adolescence to adulthood: An extension of theory and a review of research. Developmental Psychology, 18, 341 358.. 2005.... 2010.., 21, 287 295. 付記 Jin, Yijun (Graduate School of Contemporary Psychology, Rikkyo University) & Ono, Hisasi (Graduate School of Contemporary Psychology, Rikkyo University). Mother-Child Correlation in the Process of Epigenetic Development and Its Influence on Youth Identity. The Japanese Journal of Developmental Psychology 2013, Vol.24, No.3, 337 347. The present study investigated mother-child correlations in the process of epigenetic development, and the influence of such correlations on youth identity formation. Participants were 104 college students (21 males, 83 females) and their mothers. Correlational and Structural Equation Modeling analysis revealed the following: (1) there were many significant correlations between psychosocial themes of epigenetic schema for both mothers and youth; (2) significant mother-child correlations did not appear to exist for aspects of basic trust and autonomy; (3) mother s basic trust and autonomy were significantly correlated with youth identity; and (4) basic trust and autonomy of youth function as mediating variables in the model of maternal influence on youth identity. Keywords Epigenetic development, Mother-Child correlation, Youth identity, Psychosocial development 2012. 7. 25 2013. 1. 21