Microsoft Word - もくじ

Similar documents
...C...{ ren

九州大学学術情報リポジトリ Kyushu University Institutional Repository 日本語の sluicing 文に関する統語分析 前田, 雅子九州大学人文科学府 松本, 知子九州大学人文科学府 Maeda, Masako Graduate School of Huma

多重WH疑問文の扱いと島の制約(formatted)

慶應

argument_ellipsis_Takahashi_ver2

: (1) 1. ( ) P ( P ) 2. P () A0 = {a1, a2,..., an} 3a. T1 A0 () A1 3b. T1 A2 (= A1 A0 A1) 4a. T2 A2 ( ) 4b. A1 () 5. : T2 T1 T1 T2 T2 T1 T2 T1 T2 T1 T

Stadard Theory:ST( ) Extended Standard Theory:EST( ) Rivised Extended Standard Theory:REST( ) Government and


philology : philology linguistics : a. langue b. c. d. a. langue competence b. parole performance 1

八田

Grice (1957) S x p S A x 1. A p 2. A S 1 3. A S 1 p (intention-based semantics) S p x (Strawson 1964; Grice 1969; Schiffer 1972; Harman 1974; Bennett

June 30, 2007

E-2 省略現象から見た日本語動名詞句の内部構造 内芝慎也 0. はじめに (1) a. [ 太郎との相席 ] は難しいが [ 次郎との ] は問題ない b. 花子は [ 太郎との相席 ] を断り 順子は [ 次郎との ] を断った c. * 順子は [ 太郎との相席 ] をし 花子は [ 次郎との

1 (1) (2a) (2b) (2) a. [ame ga [fur anakatta] ] b. [ [ame ga fur] anakatta] (2a) (2b) 1.1 (3) (4a) (4b) (3) (4) a. [ [ ] ] b. [ [ ] ] (4a) (4b) 3 (5)

九州大学学術情報リポジトリ Kyushu University Institutional Repository 英語の二重目的語構文および前置詞与格構文について : ミニマリストアプローチ 大塚, 知昇九州大学人文科学府 Otsuka, Tomonori Graduate School of Hu

null element [...] An element which, in some particular description, is posited as existing at a certain point in a structure even though there is no


[A] 極小理論における格照合・付与の意味 (小林 (2001b))

On the Relation between the Deictic Use and the Non-deictic Use of the Japanese Demonstratives SATOSHI KINSUI* This paper addresses the status of deix

慶應

慶應

2016

1,2 3 I like *me / myself. You like *you / yourself. He likes him / himself. He thinks [ that he / *himself is intelligent ]. He thinks [ that Mary li

58 1 Labov (1972) narrative (temporal juncture) (narrative clause) narrative Labov (1972) narrative Labov and Waletzkey (1967) narrative q Abstractw O

els08ws-kuroda-slides.key

( ) ( ) Modified on 2009/05/24, 2008/09/17, 15, 12, 11, 10, 09 Created on 2008/07/02 1 1) ( ) ( ) (exgen Excel VBA ) 2)3) 1.1 ( ) ( ) : : (1) ( ) ( )

95NBK-final.dvi

9_89.pdf

1

P

Corrected Version NICT /11/15, 1 Thursday, May 7,

助詞「に」の定量的分析の試み

Microsoft PowerPoint - NMC-ProjectIntro-KobeU


昭和恐慌期における長野県下農業・農村と産業組合の展開過程

Microsoft Word 日本語教育2011

(12th) R.s!..


(2) (3) 2 vs vs (9) Edward Mansfield and Jack Snyder, Democratization and War, Foreign Affairs, Vol. 74, No

NE25.indb

白井学習法(1).ppt

untitled

Shonan Institute of Technology MEMOIRS OF SHONAN INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY Vol. 38, No. 1, b9 199d8 1 * False Belief and Recognition of a Object

Journal of International and Advanced Japanese Studies Volume 4 / March

01年譜ほか.indd

研究成果報告書(基金分)

1 Web [2] Web [3] [4] [5], [6] [7] [8] S.W. [9] 3. MeetingShelf Web MeetingShelf MeetingShelf (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) Web MeetingShelf

Future like ours FLO Don Marquis, Why AborBon is Immoral, The Journal of Philosophy, vol.86,

1 ( ) (1) (2) Pattern 1 (P1)// Pattern 2 (P2) (V1 = V2) (alternation) (SPRAY-PAINT alternation/ hypallage) (1) (2) P1: (Z ) X Y V1 P2: (Z ) X Y

Microsoft Word - KLS_paper_final.doc

33 (2016), 105 Abstract Keywords CAP Vol. 9 ( ) pp : : : :

01社会学部研究紀要.indd

36 Theoretical and Applied Linguistics at Kobe Shoin No. 20, 2017 : Key Words: syntactic compound verbs, lexical compound verbs, aspectual compound ve

: : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : :

[1], B0TB2053, i

Shonan Institute of Technology MEMOIRS OF SHONAN INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY Vol. 39, No. 1, 2005 (dóxa) 187a1 190e4 * On judgement (dóxa) in the second P

32 constructivism Rawls 1971, pp. 137, 158 Rawls 1971, pp Dworkin 2000, p Cohen 1989, p. 931 option luck neutralization Dworkin 200

1,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, Christian Henriot, Little Japan in Shanghai: An Insulated Community,, Robert Bickers and Christian H

148_hayatsu.indd

TOPIC 01 YOSHIMURA Fumiko T O P I C S 02 03

<論文>英国貴族階級所帯内労働関係における呼称の検証--20世紀前半を時代背景とする映画を分析して

日本語におけるN-Rheme

本組よこ/本組よこ_古川_P289-310

2011spTP

On the Double Object Construction*

fi„‚å-‰³‹ç−w„¤‰ƒ‰IŠv48Ł\1-4.ai

外国語教育センタージャーナル第9号

3.k.indd


鈴木(最終版)


Kyoto University * Filipino Students in Japan and International Relations in the 1930s: An Aspect of Soft Power Policies in Imperial Japan

matsuda.dvi

正誤表 グローバル コミュニケーション研究 第 4 号 ( 特別号 ) におきま して 以下の箇所に誤りがございました お詫びして訂正いたします 訂正箇所誤正 34 頁下から 2 行目約 45km 約 450km (2017 年 5 月 )

封面要旨目录打印版2


No. 3 Oct The person to the left of the stool carried the traffic-cone towards the trash-can. α α β α α β α α β α Track2 Track3 Track1 Track0 1

009260,同志社大学一神教/目次

/™Z‚å‰IŠv‚æ36“ƒ /fi¡„´“NŠm†€

, , % :

of one s information (hearsay, personal experience, traditional lore), or epistemological stance may be expected of all speakers. This is especially t

現代日本語の有情物主語の受身文

本文2/YA1307Z

NINJAL Research Papers No.8

Reason Licence 6 innocent Delights

”Y‰Æ”ЛïŸ_‘W40−ª4/ ™ƒ“ª

tikeya[at]shoin.ac.jp The Function of Quotation Form -tte as Sentence-final Particle Tomoko IKEYA Kobe Shoin Women s University Institute of Linguisti

e.g. Kubota 2011 Piller & Takahashi 2006 Kubota 2011 Piller & Takahashi 2006 Kubota 2011 Piller et al Heller 2003 Piller, Takahashi & Watanabe

‰gficŒõ/’ÓŠ¹

09_06.indd

Abstract Although physicalism is usually understood as an ontological thesis, it is not clear that what implications this position has on th

Thomas Kuhn markedness McCawley (1985)

A critical examination of the linguistic analogy of morality: Through a comparison with emotional theory of morality Senji TANAKA and Hisashi NAKAO ab

Japanese Journal of Applied Psychology


IPSJ SIG Technical Report Vol.2011-MUS-91 No /7/ , 3 1 Design and Implementation on a System for Learning Songs by Presenting Musical St

自然言語処理21_249

はじめに


149 (Newell [5]) Newell [5], [1], [1], [11] Li,Ryu, and Song [2], [11] Li,Ryu, and Song [2], [1] 1) 2) ( ) ( ) 3) T : 2 a : 3 a 1 :

Transcription:

Hornstein & Nunes (2008) Aoyagi (1999) complement adjunct do so one do so Hasegawa (1988) one 1

Minimalist Program Hornstein & Nunes (2008) (1) (1) VP Ellipsis Argument Ellipsis 1 (1) do so (2) 1 Otani & Whitman (1993), Hoji (1998), Saito (2007), Takahashi (2008) 2

2 (2) a. b. (3) a. John read a book in the library, and Mary did so in the playground. b. *John read a novel in the library, and Mary did so a magazine in the playground, (3a) (3b) do so (2a) (2b) 3 Merge Syntactic Object Label 4 Hornstein & Nunes (2008) Concatenate Label 2 Hasegawa (1988) 3 Topicalization Relativization Harada (1991) 4 Chomsky (2013) 3

5 VP Fronting (4a) (4b) V(=VP) (4) a. [eat the cake] he did in the yard b. [eat the case in the yard] he did c. *[eat] he did the cake in the yard (Hornstein & Nunes 2008: 66) (4a,b) ^ (5) a. [V eat^the-cake ]^in-the-yard b. [V [V eat^the-cake ]^in-the-yard] (Hornstein & Nunes 2008: 66) (5a) (5b) in the yard ^ eat the cake (5b) (5a) (4a) (5b) (4b) 6 5 Hornstein (2009) Hornstein & Nunes (2008) 6 (5b) V A-over-A Principle 4

(4c) (6a) (6b) Donald Davidson e neo-davidsonian argument 7 (6) a. John ate the cake in the yard. b. e [eating(e) & subject(john, e) & object(the cake, e) & in-the-yard(e)] in the yard e e in-the-yard John the cake John e the cake e 8 Chomsky (1965) S NP VP NP (5a) (5b) Hornstein and Nunes (2008) (7) (8) 7 Parsons (1990) 8 agent patient 5

(7) a. John bought BOOKS. b. John bought BOOKS in that shop. (8) John bought books in that SHOP. (7) (i) What did John buy? (ii) What did John do? (iii) What happened? unmarked stress (7b) in that shop prominent in that shop [+Focus] PP VP, vp, TP (8) (i)(ii)(iii) Where did John buy books? (9) [Context: What will John do?] a. He will play SOCCER on Sunday. b. #He will play soccer on SUNDAY. (Hornstein & Nunes 2008: 73) (10) [Context: What will John do?] a. #Play SOCCER on Sunday is what he ll do. b. Play soccer on SUNDAY is what he ll do. (Hornstein & Nunes 2008: 73) 6

(9) VP on Sunday Sunday VP soccer soccer VP What will he do? (9a) (9b) (10) (10b) on Sunday PP VP on Sunday VP on Sunday VP What will John do? (10a) VP (11a) VP TP 9 (11a) 9 Cinque (1993) Reinhart (1995) Zubizarreta (1994) Zubizarreta NP DP VP =TP 7

(11) [Context: What did John do?/what happened?] a. #He KISSED Mary. b. He kissed MARY. (Hornstein & Nunes 2008: 74) stress (12) (2006) Aoyagi (1998, 1999) 8

(13) Aoyagi (1998, 1999) 10 Hornstein & Nunes (2008) Hornstein & Nunes (2008) Hornstein & Nunes propagation quantifier Kuroda 1965 Hornstein & Nunes (2008) (2006) (i) scope (ii) focus (i) 10 Aoyagi (1998, 1999) 9

(14) a. [TP [vp [DP ] [VP [DP [NP ] D+ ] ] v ] ] b. [TP [vp [DP ] [VP [DP [NP ] D+ti] ] v+ ] ] (12) (14a) DP D 14b LF v 11 VP c c-command VP 12 c c (ii) [+focus] [+focus] LF agreement (12) (14') 11 (14b) (2006: 15-24) (=X 0 ) =X max clitic pronoun X max X 0 Head Movement Constraint, cf. Baker (1988) 12 VP vp 10

13 [+f] VP [+f] VP [+f] (14') [TP [vp [DP ] [VP [+f] [DP [+f] [NP [+f] ] D+ti] ] v+ [+f] ] ] (i) (ii) association with focus [+focus] [+focus] (2006) 14 Hornstein & Nunes (2008) (14) VP (15) (16) a. [TP [vp [DP ] [VP [PP ] [DP [NP ] D+ ] ] v ] ] b. [TP [vp [DP ] [VP [PP ] [DP [NP ] D+ti] ] v+ ] ] 13 T v (2006: 140-145) 14 Aoyagi (1998, 1999) Aoyagi (1999) Condition on Extraction Domain, CED cf. Huang (1982) 11

(15) (14b) (16b) v c VP Hornstein & Nunes (16b) VP 15 c c 16 Hornstein & Nunes (2008) Hornstein & Nunes (2008) 15 16 (i) 12

17 (17) a. b. Do Do-Support Su Su-Support Kuroda 1965 (17) (18) a.?? b.?? LF 17 (2006: 135-148) 13

(19a) TP Focus (19b) LF FocusP VP 18 (19) a. [FocusP [TP [vp NP [VP NP V] v+ / ]] T ] Focus] b. [FocusP [VP NP V] [TP [vp NP ti v+ / ]] T ] Focus] (20) (21) V(=VP) (21) [V ] VP (22) V(=VP) 18 vp 14

V(=VP) (22) [V ] V(=VP) (23) [V ] Hornstein & Nunes (2008: 67) (24) a. [eat the cake] he did in the yard with a fork in the afternoon b. [eat the cake in the yard] he did with a fork in the afternoon c. [eat the cake in the yard with a fork] he did in the afternoon d. [eat the cake in the yard with a fork in the afternoon] he did LF LF 15

c 19 vp Hornstein & Nunes (2008) LF (25) (25) VP (26) V (26) [[V ]- ] [[V ]- ] (11a) 19 c VP VP VP 16

(25)/(26) Hornstein & Nunes (2008) c c [+focus] Hornstein & Nunes (2008) 17

(2006) LF Hornstein & Nunes (2008) 20 LF 21 Aoyagi, Hiroshi (1998) On the Nature of Particles in Japanese and Its Theoretical Implications, Doctoral dissertation, University of Southern California. Aoyagi, Hiroshi (1999) "On the Association of Quantifier-like Particles with Focus in Japanese," Linguistics: In Search of the Human Mind A Festschrift for Kazuko Inoue, ed. by Masatake Muraki and Enoch Iwamoto, 24-56, Kaitakusha, Tokyo. 2006 20 GB Chomsky (1981) D LF Chomsky (2007, 2008) duality of semantics 21 LF 18

Baker, Mark (1988) Incorporation, University of Chicago Press, Chicago. Chomsky, Noam (1965) Aspects of the Theory of Syntax, MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass. Chomsky, Noam (1981) Lectures on Government and Binding, Foris, Dordrecht. Chomsky, Noam (2007) "Approaching UG from Below," Interfaces + Recursion = Language? Chomsky s Minimalism and the View from Semantics, ed. by Uli Sauerland and Hans Martin Gärtner, 1 29, Mouton de Gruyter, Berlin. Chomsky, Noam (2008) "On Phases," Foundational issues in linguistic theory, ed. by Robert Freidin, Carlos P. Otero, and Maria Luisa Zubizarreta, 133-166, MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass. Chomsky, Noam (2013) "Problems of Projection," Lingua 130, 33-49. Cinque, Guglielmo (1993) "A Null Theory of Phrase and Compound Stress," Linguistic Inquiry 24, 239-298. Harada, Yasunari (1991) "On the distinction between complement and adjunct in Japanese," The Sixth Japanese-Korean Joint Conference on Formal Linguistics: Proceedings of the Sixth Japanese-Korean Joint Workshop, ed. by Akira Ikeya, 35-48, Logico-Linguistic Society of Japan. Hasegawa, Yoko (1988) "Question Pull: A Diagnostic Test for the Complement/Adjunct Distinction in Japanese," Proceedings of the Fourteenth Annual Meetings of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, 66-77. Hoji, Hajime (1998) "Null Objects and Sloppy Identity in Japanese," Linguistic Inquiry 29: 127-152. Hornstein, Nobert (2009) A Theory of Syntax: Minimal Operations and Universal Grammar, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. Hornstein, Nobert and Jairo Nunes. (2008) "Adjunction, Labeling, and Bare Phrase Structure," Biolinguistics 2.1: 57-86. 19

Huang, C.-T. James (1982) Logical Relations in Chinese and the Theory of Grammar, Doctoral dissertation, MIT. Kuroda, Shige-yuki (1965) A Generative-Grammatical Studies of the Japanese Language, Doctoral dissertation, MIT. Otani, Kazuyo and John Whitman (1991) "V-Raising and VP-Ellipsis," Linguistic Inquiry 22: 345-358. Parsons, Terence (1990) Events in the Semantics of English, MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass. Reinhart, Tanya (1995) Interface Strategies, OTS Working Papers in Linguistics, Utrecht University. Saito, Mamoru (2007) "Notes on East Asian Argument Ellipsis," Language Research 43, 203-227. Takahashi, Daiko (2008) "Noun Phrase Ellipsis," The Oxford Handbook of Japanese Linguistics, ed. by Shigeru Miyagawa and Mamoru Saito, 394-422, Oxford University Press, New York. Zubizarreta, Maria Luisa (1994) "The Grammatical Representation of Topic and Focus: Implications for the Structure of the Clause," University of Venice Working Papers in Linguistics, Vol. 4, No, 1, 97-126. 20