2013 22 1 1 12 2013 1,2,3 Temptation Coping Strategy in Academic situation: TCSA 1 40 TCSA 4 202 3 TCSA 2002 1999 2007 175 2011 223 3 e.g., Ainslie, 1992 2 e.g., Fujita, 2008; Hoch & Loewenstein, 1991 e.g., Fishbach & Converse, 2010
2 22 1 e.g., Fishbach, Friedman, & Kruglanski, 2003; Fujita & Han, 2009; Gollwitzer, 1999; Metcalfe & Mischel, 1999; Mischel & Mischel, 1983; Moore, Mischel, & Zeiss, 1976 e.g., Metcalfe & Mischel, 1999 Mischel & Mischel, 1983 Moore et al., 1976 Fishbach et al. 2003 e.g., television e.g., study e.g., study e.g., television Papies, Stroebe, & Aarts, 2007 Fujita, 2011 Temptation Coping Strategy in Academic situation: TCSA Kroese, Evers, & De Ridder, 2011 TCSA 110 30 80 18.85 0.79 3
3 3 3, 1 312 3 KJ 3 40 1 TCSA 15341 110 2 20.58 0.94 TCSA 40 7 1 7 TCSA 40 8.20, 4.01, 2.87, 1.80, 1.60 4.40.40 20 4 4 63.52% Table 1 1 7 2 5
4 22 1 Table 1 I II III IV 1 37..88.03.01.10.71 19..85.07.02.03.65 14..82.21.12.02.66 35..64.19.07.12.59 24..60.09.03.07.44 26..55.04.13.06.44 4..52.03.13.27.43 2 7..14.80.05.08.62 22..03.76.04.10.57 2..03.76.02.03.60 3..02.65.19.03.48 32..10.61.08.03.39 3 34..21.03.85.14.73 13..11.05.69.04.50 15..23.09.67.18.52 29..09.02.64.12.46 23..04.02.62.00.41 4 30..04.02.02.81.67 18..03.06.12.74.64 8..17.05.02.57.49 I.30.32.51 II.19.32 III.43 IV 3 5 4 3 20 TCSA α 7 ; α.88 5 α.82 5 α.82 3 α.77 Table 2 3
5 Table 2t t 4.61 1.17 0.41 0.37 4.59 4.76 1.18 1.09 0.83 5.33 0.95 0.61 0.33 5.41 5.17 0.87 1.11 1.25 3.96 1.24 0.34 0.56 3.92 4.06 1.27 1.19 0.62 4.84 1.15 0.67 0.34 4.92 4.65 1.08 1.26 1.28 t t TCSA 312 13 20% 14% 12% 19% 15% 11% 2 TCSA 2010 2010 2010 1 TCSA 2010 Zimmerman, 1986, 1989 1 2 2010 TCSA 2 TCSA 2010 e.g., 2010; Metcalfe & Mischel, 1999 4 2 4
6 22 1 TCSA TCSA TCSA 2010 e.g., 2010 van Eerde, 20032010 3 3 2 27 Fishbach et al. 2003 1 TCSA TCSA TCSA TCSA TCSA 386 200 182 4 ; 19.47 1.21 TCSA 17 5 1 TCSA 1 204 α.82.88 22010 15 2 α.68,.63 32010 122 α.84,.75 42010
7 42 7 α.79.90 TCSA 1 4 TCSA Table 3 TCSA TCSA TCSA TCSA TCSA TCSA TCSA Table 3.34***.35***.31***.42***.31***.21***.27***.28***.36***.25***.47***.47***.11*.10.10.12*.01.05.00.04.08.02.19***.22***.34***.23***.33***.29***.19***.14**.19***.14**.02.03.12*.09.15**.16**.09.07.16**.25***.03.17** p.10, * p.05, ** p.01, *** p.001
8 22 1 TCSA 3 TCSA 1 2011 6 Time 1 7 Time 2 Time 1 Time 2 2 Time 1 136 Time 2 134 Time 1 Time 2 2 104 29 75 20.01 0.86 1 2 Time 1 α.78.88 Time 2 α.87.91 1, 2 4 TCSA Time 1 Time 2 r.79, p.001 r.72, p.001r.76, p.001 r.60, p.001 Time 1 TCSA 4 Ward 5 5 1 17 a 2 33 b 3 27 c 4 15 d 5 13 e 5 5 Time 2
9 Table 4 a (n 17) b (n 33) c (n 27) d (n 15) e (n 13) F 5.83 α 4.16 γ 4.96 β 4.23 γ 2.79 δ (0.61) (0.67) (0.76) (0.43) (0.73) 44.37*** 5.72 α 5.41 αβ 5.72 α 4.81 β 3.97 γ (1.13) (0.64) (0.71) (0.47) (0.85) 14.86*** 5.12 α 4.57 α 3.09 β 3.41 β 2.89 β (0.87) (0.63) (0.86) (0.46) (0.83) 33.82*** 6.27 α 4.81 β 4.79 β 3.33 γ 3.97 δ (0.58) (0.48) (0.69) (0.55) (1.06) 45.22*** 1 2α, β, γ, δ *** p.001 7 a b c d e d 6 b c 5 4 3 2 1 a b c d e Figure 1 TCSA Table 4 a e Figure 1 b c d b c d c b d 1TCSA 4 2 3 3 TCSA
10 22 1 e.g., Fishbach & Converse, 2010 TCSA TCSA TCSA 2 TCSA TCSA 1 TCSA TCSA TCSA TCSA TCSA TCSA vs.
11 Ainslie, G. (1992). Picoeconomics: The strategic interaction of successive motivational states within the person. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. 1999 27 179 180. Fishbach, A., & Converse, B. A. (2010). Identifying and battling temptation. In K. D. Vohs & R. F. Baumeister (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation: Research, theory and applications. 2nd ed. New York: Guilford. pp. 244 260. Fishbach, A., Friedman, R. S., & Kruglanski, A. W. (2003). Leading us not unto temptation: Momentary allurements elicit overriding goal activation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84, 296 309. Fujita, K. (2008). Seeing the forest beyond the trees: A construal level approach to self-control. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 2, 1475 1496. Fujita, K. (2011). On conceptualizing self-control as more than the effortful inhibition of impulses. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 15, 352 366. Fujita, K., & Han, H. A. (2009). Moving beyond deliberative control of impulses: The effects of construal levels on evaluative associations in selfcontrol. Psychological Science, 20, 799 804. 2010 19, 81 86. Gollwitzer, P. M. (1999). Implementation intentions: Strong effects of simple plans. American Psychologist, 54, 493 503. Hoch, S. J., & Loewenstein, G. F. (1991). Timeinconsistent preferences and consumer self-control. Journal of Consumer Research, 17, 492 507. 2002 2007 34, 67 77. 2010 58, 325 337. Kroese, F. M., Evers, C., & De Ridder, D. T. D. (2011). Tricky treats:paradoxical effects of temptation strength on self-regulation processes. European Journal of Social Psychology, 41, 281 288. Metcalfe, J., & Mischel, W. (1999). A hot/cool-system analysis of delay of gratification: Dynamics of willpower. Psychological Review, 106, 3 19. Mischel, H. N., & Mischel, W. (1983). The development of children s knowledge of self-control strategies. Child Development, 54, 603 619. Moore, B., Mischel, W., & Zeiss, A. (1976). Comparative effects of the reward stimulus and its cognitive representation in voluntary delay. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 34, 419 424. 2010 52 655. Papies, E. K., Stroebe, W., & Aarts, H. (2007). Pleasure in the mind: Restrained eating and spontaneous hedonic thoughts about food. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 43, 810 817. Zimmerman, B. J. (1986). Becoming a self-regulated learner: Which are the key subprocesses? Contemporary Educational Psychology, 11, 307 313. Zimmerman, B. J. (1989). A social cognitive view of self-regulated academic learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 81, 329 339. van Eerde, W. (2003). A meta-analytically derived nomological network of procrastination. Personality and Individual Differences, 35, 1401 1418 2011.12.182012.11.16
12 22 1 Development of the Scale of Temptation Coping Strategies in Academic Situations Mai Kobayashi Toyo University The Japanese Journal of Personality 2013, Vol. 22 No. 1, 1 12 The scale of Temptation Coping Strategies in Academic Situations (TCSA) was developed for identifying individual differences in self-control strategies in achievement situations. In Study 1, 153 college students were asked about coping strategies, and 40 items were selected for the use in the TCSA. The results of factor analysis showed a four-factor solution (Goal Verification, Distraction, Temptation Avoidance, and Goal Execution). In Study 2, the relationships were examined among the TCSA, the self-regulated learning strategies scale (Fujita, 2010) the academic delay of gratification scale (Ogawauchi et al., 2010) and the scale of awareness of procrastination (Kohama, 2010). The results supported the validity of the TCSA. In Study 3, the TCSA was administered twice two weeks apart to determine test retest reliability. Finally, implications for future research were discussed. Key words: self-control, self-regulation, goal pursuit, temptation, development of scale