e.g., Mahoney, Vandell, Simpkins, & Zarrett, Bohnert, Fredricks, & Randall2010 breadth intensitydurationengagement e.g., Mahone

Similar documents
56 56 The Development of Preschool Children s Views About Conflict Resolution With Peers : Diversity of changes from five-year-olds to six-year-olds Y

2 251 Barrera, 1986; Barrera, e.g., Gottlieb, 1985 Wethington & Kessler 1986 r Cohen & Wills,

THE JAPANESE JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY 2007, Vol. 15 No. 2, 217–227

+深見将志.indd

04-p45-67cs5.indd

Jpn. J. Personality 18(2): (2009)

スポーツ教育学研究(2013. Vol.33, No1, pp.1-13)

Elmore & Pohlmann Greenwood & Ramagli a b c a b c

50 Planned Happenstance Parsons Brown Brooks, Gelatt Gelatt 1962 Gelatt, positive uncertainty nonrational Gelatt, 1



46

,,.,,.,..,.,,,.,, Aldous,.,,.,,.,,, NPO,,.,,,,,,.,,,,.,,,,..,,,,.,

Japanese Journal of Applied Psychology

パーソナリティ研究 2005 第13巻 第2号 170–182

Adult Attachment Projective AAP PARS PARS PARS PARS Table

(2002a) (1) American Psychiatric Association, (1985) (1989) 1985 (1998) (1999a) (2) 1995 Grotevant, 1998 Leary, T

16_.....E...._.I.v2006

発達心理学研究 第24巻 第3号

_Y13™n‹ä

202


日本人の子育て観-JGSS-2008 データに見る社会の育児能力に対する評価-

1. 緒言 p 問題の所在 ) p



The Japanese Journal of Health Psychology, 29(S): (2017)

【教】⑮長島真人先生【本文】/【教】⑮長島真人先生【本文】

pp Dimensional Change Card Sort ****** ** Zelazo, P. D., Carter, A., Reznick, J. S. & Frye, D Zelaz

越智59.qxd


Japanese Journal of Applied Psychology

:... a

HPV HPV HPV HPV 7 HPV 8 9 HPV 3 HPV HPV HPV , Becker Ajzen H

/toushin/.htm GP GP GP GP GP p.

Newgarten, BL., Havighrst, RJ., & Tobin, S.Life Satisfaction Index-A LSIDiener. E.,Emmons,R.A.,Larsen,R.J.,&Griffin,S. The Satisfaction With Life Scal


ABSTRACT

Web Stamps 96 KJ Stamps Web Vol 8, No 1, 2004

220 28;29) 30 35) 26;27) % 8.0% 9 36) 8) 14) 37) O O 13 2 E S % % 2 6 1fl 2fl 3fl 3 4

Japanese Journal of Applied Psychology

untitled

大学論集/論考/14


本文24号.PDF

(’Ó)”R

橡石本・図表切り貼り版2.PDF

【教】⑩山森直人先生【本文】/【教】⑩山森直人先生【本文】

”Y‰Æ”ЛïŸ_‘W40−ª3/ ’¼„´

01_渡部先生_21-2.indd

66-1 田中健吾・松浦紗織.pwd


Perspective-Taking Perspective-Taking.... Vol. No.



Vol. 48 No. 3 Mar PM PM PMBOK PM PM PM PM PM A Proposal and Its Demonstration of Developing System for Project Managers through University-Indus

(2004) (2002) (2004) ( 1990,Smith,Standinger, & Baltes,1994,Carstensen, et al., 2000) (1990) (2006)

When creating an interactive case scenario of a problem that may occur in the educational field, it becomes especially difficult to assume a clear obj


Kyoto University * Filipino Students in Japan and International Relations in the 1930s: An Aspect of Soft Power Policies in Imperial Japan


OJT Planned Happenstance

:. SPSS

<30315F985F95B65F90B490852E696E6464>


Table 1 Means and standard deviations of topic familiarity for the topics used in the study Note. standard deviations are in parenthesis.

...

Ł\1,4.ai

07_高平小百合.indd

Human Welfare 8‐1☆/4.坂口


研究成果報告書(基金分)

ハイコミットメントモデルの有効性についての考察 

untitled

52-2.indb

The Japanese Journal of Psychology 1984, Vol. 55, No. 3, Effects of self-disclosure on interpersonal attraction Masahiko Nakamura (Department

CMCの社会的ネットワークを介した社会的スキルと孤独感との関連性

56

untitled


Vol. 52 No ,332,000 1,638, ,774 8 A ,11, II. A. % % B. 500 A A N=353

) ,

The Japanese Journal of Psychology 2000, Vol. 71, No. 3, Emotion recognition: Facial components associated with various emotions Ken Gouta and

ODA NGO NGO JICA JICA NGO JICA JBIC SCP

Appropriate Disaster Preparedness Education in Classrooms According to Students Grade, from Kindergarten through High School Contrivance of an Educati

untitled

Human Welfare 8‐1☆/5.林


日本における結婚観の変化―JGSS累積データ を用いた分析―

<8ED089EF8B D312D30914F95742E696E6464>

大学論集第42号本文.indb

Juntendo Medical Journal

医学紀要011-渡邊.indd

e.g. Kubota 2011 Piller & Takahashi 2006 Kubota 2011 Piller & Takahashi 2006 Kubota 2011 Piller et al Heller 2003 Piller, Takahashi & Watanabe

評論・社会科学 98号(P)☆/1.鰺坂

山大紀要13

Newsome and Dowling, 2006 a) Frey et al., Newsome and Dowling (2006 b)2008) 2011 )

TEM



Transcription:

2014 25 4 453465 1 670 6 1 2 2008, 2009 2002 e.g., 2002; 1999 100 1 2 2013; 2002; 1999 1 2007 2009 2006; 20082006 2013

454 254 e.g., Mahoney, Vandell, Simpkins, & Zarrett, 2009 1 23 2013 Bohnert, Fredricks, & Randall2010 breadth intensitydurationengagement e.g., Mahoney et al., 2009 4 Bohnert et al.2010 e.g., Mahoney et al., 2009 Mahoney et al., 2009

455 2006 e.g. 1994; 2004 3 1 2 3 19 7 12 1 24 1 1 1 60 IC 3 KJ 1967 8 9 4 5 721 670 92.93 19.09 1.04 18 24 3

456 254 2 2 4 1 3 6 1 Bohnert et al.2010 breadth 121 31 41 3 53 6 6 1 A B CD i ii iiid iii 3 1 iii i ii30 A ii10 4 iii30 1 A iii1 iva iv 4 1 BD iv Bohnert et al.2010 3 15 5 KJ 199620 5 KJ 1997 22 5 20082009 20092009 58 5 BIG FIVE 1996 60 5 7 SPSS19.0 Amos 19.0

457 BIG FIVE e.g., 2009 1 15 9.00 1.190.911 1 α α.95 20 6.001.811.22 1 1.35 1 α α.80 22 4.813.61 1.200.79 2 2 Promax 14 Promax 2 α α.84 Promax α Table 1 58 1.0 6 12.183.821.691.211.04.95.836 Table 1 h 2 α.84.81.15.68.79.17.66.78.14.62.69.18.52.69.19.51.51.19.29.38.02.14 α.84.03.75.56.16.75.58.21.71.53.12.69.50.21.63.45.01.47.22 1.04.41.17.04

458 254 Table 2 h 2 α.93.88.03.03.07.09.09.63.84.05.02.02.02.00.74.82.08.01.01.00.14.65.82.05.02.07.12.04.72 1.77.05.01.04.00.04.72.65.02.04.19.01.05.70.47.07.18.11.01.19.66 α.85.01.89.07.02.01.05.74.07.87.04.03.12.00.61.15.63.14.12.08.03.47.05.58.01.05.09.20.60.13.54.12.16.03.13.43 α.82.05.02.82.02.05.03.70.01.15.70.09.07.12.48.30.05.70.04.21.01.42.01.07.66.01.05.19.44.18.18.65.02.14.00.55.16.08.48.05.10.06.30 α.89.04.04.01.87.01.01.77.03.10.00.76.25.11.69.03.07.07.70.04.03.65.03.15.07.66.08.10.60.04.06.06.51.02.14.45 α.89.15.14.08.00.96.08.81.03.20.06.07.64.05.66.04.02.13.17.61.10.68.00.06.06.02.51.35.68 α.74.08.05.09.11.10.76.47.03.00.10.11.07.63.42.03.05.08.20.10.54.37.21.07.14.03.04.48.61.62.43.69.54.62.01.65.57.60.16.11.10.67.74.68

459 6 Promax 31 Promax 6 α α.74 Promax α Table 2 A D 4 Table 3 5 Table 4 5 2 5 F1, 653 10.177p.001F1, 653 6.472p.011 Table 3 3.17 1.20 1.89 0.52 2.40 0.74 3.52 0.92 3.59 0.69 2.54 0.87 3.45 0.79 3.55 0.97 3.43 0.82 2.18 0.75 2.96 0.88 2.86 0.99 2.49 0.84 Table 5 b.19

460 254 Table 4 BIG FIVE 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 1 2.58 3.52.78 4.41.49.40 5 6 7.24.26.21.58.15.16.16.10.38.42.49.43.78.58.01 8.28.34.27.67.64.16.67 9.19.24.19.37.27.13.41.61 10 11 12 13.11.12.03.33.41.40.23.33.06.22.27.21.52.40.03.56.68.62.07.22.27.19.52.33.06.59.62.57.06.71.18.21.14.46.32.02.47.58.52.00.68.64 B I G F I V E 14.04.11.01.33.26.15.31.38.21.35.41.45.30 15.03.04.01.09.15.29.09.07.13.13.07.10.14.32 16.01.01.01.12.06.10.06.16.14.16.13.17.10.16.05 17.11.15.07.23.17.18.17.20.18.27.18.18.11.41.24.18 18.02.00.02.10.05.03.14.05.08.04.27.25.16.35.07.12.26.13.10.15.17.21.07.15.12.04.13.06.04.00.04.01.05.02.00.07.06.07.03.03.01.03.12.11.02.06.01.01.06.05.09.01.07 p.001 p.01 p.05 6 Bohnert et al., 2010 Figure 1

461 Table 5.01.03.01.00.01.02.04.09.09.04.08.04.02.01.19.02.07.08.65.33.34.52.51.48 R 2.46.17.13.28.28.22 p.001.38 集団親密性.58.01.17.68 目標志向的行動 ストレス経験 e7.64 傾倒.58.34.26 集団への e1 肯定的感情.27.23 他者意識の.23 e2 高まり.19.22.26.19 集団活動に e3.30 対する消耗感.21.35 問題解決への.33 積極性 e4.18.37.47 他者統率の熟達 e5.24.25.26 学校活動への更なる傾倒 e6 0.1 Figure 1 0.1 b.26 b.21 b.18 b.24 0.1 b.22 0.1 b.17 b.68 0.1 b.34 0.1 b.19 0.1 b.27 b.23 b.33 b.47 b.26 0.1 b.19 b.30 BIG FIVE 1 1 0.1 BIG FIVE 5 0.1 0.1 b.14 0.1 n.s. b.14

2006 462 254

463 Jensen-Campbell & Graziano, 2001 growth curve modelsfarb & Matjasko, 2012 2009 18, 46 56. Bohnert, A., Fredricks, J., & Randall, E. 2010. Capturing unique dimensions of youth organized activity involvement: Theoretical and methodological considerations. Review of Educational Research, 80, 576 610. Farb, A. F., & Matjasko, J. L. 2012. Recent advances in research on school-based extracurricular activities and adolescent development. Developmental Review, 32, 1 48. 2009 16, 135 144. 2002 3 4, 308 315. 2009 2, 129 134. 1996 72, 47 71. Jensen-Campbell, L. A., & Graziano, W. G. 2001. Agreeableness as a moderator of interpersonal conflict. Journal of Personality, 69, 323 361. 1994 5, 72 83. 1967 2006

464 254 17, 207 218. 2013 52, 375 383. Mahoney, J.L., Vandell, D.L., Simpkins, S.D., & Zarrett, N.R. 2009. Adolescent out-of-school activities. In R.M. Lerner & L. Steinberg Eds., Handbook of adolescent psychology: Vol.2 3rd ed., pp.228 267. John Wiley & Sons. 2008 2009 2009 57, 24 37. 2007 I 57, 75 83. 2002. 5 1997 SRS-18 4, 22 29. 2006 54, 101 111. 2008 32, 177 180. 2004 15, 13 26. 1996 Big Five 67, 61 67. 1999 7, 90 102. 2002 10, 57 67. 1999 24

465 Komoto, Aiko Graduate School of Education, The University of Tokyo. The Developmental Significance of School Events in Secondary Schools: Exploring Retrospective Meaning from the Perspective of University Students. THE JAPANESE JOURNAL OF DEVELOPMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY 2014, Vol.25, No.4, 453 465. School events called gakkou gyoji in Japaneseare part of the national curriculum, yet little is known about the developmental significance of school events. The purpose of this study was to explore the retrospective meaning ascribed to school events from the perspective of individuals who had been involved in such activities. University students N 670 were asked to complete a questionnaire about their experiences in school events at secondary school. Six aspects of meaning were identified: feeling positive about group activities, becoming considerate of others, getting exhausted with group activities, becoming active in the resolution of problems, improving of leadership proficiency, and increasing commitment to school activities. The results revealed that 1among the dimensions of involvement, only engagement was associated with all aspects of meaning; 2among activity qualities, goal-oriented behavior was strongly associated with engagement; and 3agreeableness had a moderating effect on the association between activity quality and engagement. These findings suggested that school events can have developmental meaning and significance as life events. Further longitudinal research is needed to examine developmental outcomes and processes, while considering individual personality characteristics. Keywords School events, Meaning, Adolescence, Secondary school, Structured activities 2014.3.4 2014.7.3