Evaluation of a SATOYAMA Forest Using a Voluntary Labor Supply Curve Version: c 2003 Taku Terawaki, Akio Muranaka URL: http

Similar documents
And Business

J. JILA 64 (5), 2001

「スウェーデン企業におけるワーク・ライフ・バランス調査 」報告書

CVM CVM 1 1 Revealed Preference Stated Preference CVM CVM CVM CVM NOAA 3 CVM 4 5 CVM 2.2 CVM CVM CVM2 CVM 2 Vol.3 No Spring 003

日本内科学会雑誌第102巻第4号

2 1,2, , 2 ( ) (1) (2) (3) (4) Cameron and Trivedi(1998) , (1987) (1982) Agresti(2003)

13 劉 近藤・・/劉 近藤

Title 最適年金の理論 Author(s) 藤井, 隆雄 ; 林, 史明 ; 入谷, 純 ; 小黒, 一正 Citation Issue Date Type Technical Report Text Version publisher URL

わが国企業による資金調達方法の選択問題

(2004 ) 2 (A) (B) (C) 3 (1987) (1988) Shimono and Tachibanaki(1985) (2008) , % 2 (1999) (2005) 3 (2005) (2006) (2008)

untitled

Auerbach and Kotlikoff(1987) (1987) (1988) 4 (2004) 5 Diamond(1965) Auerbach and Kotlikoff(1987) 1 ( ) ,

医系の統計入門第 2 版 サンプルページ この本の定価 判型などは, 以下の URL からご覧いただけます. このサンプルページの内容は, 第 2 版 1 刷発行時のものです.

chap10.dvi


,398 4% 017,

y = x x R = 0. 9, R = σ $ = y x w = x y x x w = x y α ε = + β + x x x y α ε = + β + γ x + x x x x' = / x y' = y/ x y' =

,, Poisson 3 3. t t y,, y n Nµ, σ 2 y i µ + ɛ i ɛ i N0, σ 2 E[y i ] µ * i y i x i y i α + βx i + ɛ i ɛ i N0, σ 2, α, β *3 y i E[y i ] α + βx i

Twist knot orbifold Chern-Simons

自由集会時系列part2web.key

COE-RES Discussion Paper Series Center of Excellence Project The Normative Evaluation and Social Choice of Contemporary Economic Systems Graduate Scho

03.Œk’ì

橡表紙参照.PDF

日本内科学会雑誌第97巻第7号

日本内科学会雑誌第98巻第4号

BayesfiI‡É“ÅfiK‡È−w‘K‡Ì‡½‡ß‡ÌChow-Liu…A…‰…S…−…Y…•

Microsoft Word - 表紙.docx

chap9.dvi

研究シリーズ第40号

seminar0220a.dvi


untitled

第3章.DOC

Autumn II III Zon and Muysken 2005 Zon and Muysken 2005 IV II 障害者への所得移転の経済効果 分析に用いるデータ


ii 3.,. 4. F. (), ,,. 8.,. 1. (75%) (25%) =7 20, =7 21 (. ). 1.,, (). 3.,. 1. ().,.,.,.,.,. () (12 )., (), 0. 2., 1., 0,.

Preliminary Version Manning et al. (1986) Rand Health Insurance Experiment Manning et al. (1986) 3 Medicare Me

橡森林管理に対する市民の要求の評価

% 30% 70% , ( 27 1 ) % 20% 3 0% 20% % 10% ( ) (5,500) (2,750)

x T = (x 1,, x M ) x T x M K C 1,, C K 22 x w y 1: 2 2

201711grade1ouyou.pdf

所得税と課税最低限に関する一考察

第5章 偏微分方程式の境界値問題

税制改正にともなう家計の所得弾性値 : 高齢者パネルデータによる実証分析

ii 3.,. 4. F. ( ), ,,. 8.,. 1. (75% ) (25% ) =7 24, =7 25, =7 26 (. ). 1.,, ( ). 3.,...,.,.,.,.,. ( ) (1 2 )., ( ), 0., 1., 0,.

untitled

2 G(k) e ikx = (ik) n x n n! n=0 (k ) ( ) X n = ( i) n n k n G(k) k=0 F (k) ln G(k) = ln e ikx n κ n F (k) = F (k) (ik) n n= n! κ n κ n = ( i) n n k n

1990年代以降の日本の経済変動

A

shuron.dvi

: : : : ) ) 1. d ij f i e i x i v j m a ij m f ij n x i =

KATO, Hironori ONODA, Keiichi KIMATA, Masaki Becker DeSerpa 7 8 value of saving time Value of Travel Time Saving VTTS 002 Vol.

BIS CDO CDO CDO CDO Cifuentes and O Connor[1] Finger[6] Li[8] Duffie and Garleânu[4] CDO Merton[9] CDO 1 CDO CDO CDS CDO three jump model Longstaff an

Public Pension and Immigration The Effects of Immigration on Welfare Inequality The immigration of unskilled workers has been analyzed by a considerab

さくらの個別指導 ( さくら教育研究所 ) 1 φ = φ 1 : φ [ ] a [ ] 1 a : b a b b(a + b) b a 2 a 2 = b(a + b). b 2 ( a b ) 2 = a b a/b X 2 X 1 = 0 a/b > 0 2 a

y i OLS [0, 1] OLS x i = (1, x 1,i,, x k,i ) β = (β 0, β 1,, β k ) G ( x i β) 1 G i 1 π i π i P {y i = 1 x i } = G (

Optical Flow t t + δt 1 Motion Field 3 3 1) 2) 3) Lucas-Kanade 4) 1 t (x, y) I(x, y, t)

note1.dvi

waseda2010a-jukaiki1-main.dvi

untitled

カルマンフィルターによるベータ推定( )

A = A x x + A y y + A, B = B x x + B y y + B, C = C x x + C y y + C..6 x y A B C = A x x + A y y + A B x B y B C x C y C { B = A x x + A y y + A y B B

I = [a, b] R γ : I C γ(a) = γ(b) z C \ γ(i) 1(4) γ z winding number index Ind γ (z) = φ(b, z) φ(a, z) φ 1(1) (i)(ii) 1 1 c C \ {0} B(c; c ) L c z B(c;

(Compton Scattering) Beaming 1 exp [i (k x ωt)] k λ k = 2π/λ ω = 2πν k = ω/c k x ωt ( ω ) k α c, k k x ωt η αβ k α x β diag( + ++) x β = (ct, x) O O x

Ł\”ƒ-2005

日本の教育経済学:実証分析の展望と課題.pdf

第90回日本感染症学会学術講演会抄録(I)

ax 2 + bx + c = n 8 (n ) a n x n + a n 1 x n a 1 x + a 0 = 0 ( a n, a n 1,, a 1, a 0 a n 0) n n ( ) ( ) ax 3 + bx 2 + cx + d = 0 4

2 3 4 II ,000 3, , ,010 3, , % (2%) ,

20/September/ (2007) (2007) Berger- ( 2000) Cinii 8 Sociological Abstracts relative deprivation ) *1 (2007) *2 2 4 δ Boudon-Kosaka

SO(3) 7 = = 1 ( r ) + 1 r r r r ( l ) (5.17) l = 1 ( sin θ ) + sin θ θ θ ϕ (5.18) χ(r)ψ(θ, ϕ) l ψ = αψ (5.19) l 1 = i(sin ϕ θ l = i( cos ϕ θ l 3 = i ϕ

1 Nelson-Siegel Nelson and Siegel(1987) 3 Nelson-Siegel 3 Nelson-Siegel 2 3 Nelson-Siegel 2 Nelson-Siegel Litterman and Scheinkman(199

On the Limited Sample Effect of the Optimum Classifier by Bayesian Approach he Case of Independent Sample Size for Each Class Xuexian HA, etsushi WAKA


ohpmain.dvi


直交座標系の回転

all.dvi


guideline_1_0.dvi

財政赤字の経済分析:中長期的視点からの考察

財政赤字の経済分析:中長期的視点からの考察

2016 (8) Variety Expansion Effects by Feenstra (1994) 1 Variety Effects Dixit and Stiglitz (1977) CES n n? n t U t = ( nt i=1 σ > 1, a it > 0,

CVaR

all.dvi

448 Vol. 44 No 図

村本 孜51‐85/51‐85

物価変動の決定要因について ― 需給ギャップと物価変動の関係の国際比較を中心に―

k2 ( :35 ) ( k2) (GLM) web web 1 :


renshumondai-kaito.dvi

遺産相続、学歴及び退職金の決定要因に関する実証分析 『家族関係、就労、退職金及び教育・資産の世代間移転に関する世帯アンケート調査』

12/1 ( ) GLM, R MCMC, WinBUGS 12/2 ( ) WinBUGS WinBUGS 12/2 ( ) : 12/3 ( ) :? ( :51 ) 2/ 71

プリント

untitled

02.„o“φiflì„㙃fic†j

untitled

LCC LCC INOUE, Gaku TANSEI, Kiyoteru KIDO, Motohiro IMAMURA, Takahiro LCC 7 LCC Ryanair 1 Ryanair Number of Passengers 2,000,000 1,800,000 1,

Visit Japan Campaign OD OD 18 UNWTO 19 OD JNTO ODUNWTO 1 1


Transcription:

14 9 27 2003 Evaluation of a SATOYAMA Forest Using a Voluntary Labor Supply Curve 1 1 2 Version: 15 10 1 c 2003 Taku Terawaki, Akio Muranaka URL: http://www.taku-t.com/ 1 [14] 3 [10] 3 2 Andreoni[1] Duncan[7] 1

CVM Contingent Valuation Method 3 1999 Geographic Information Systems GIS GIS 1980 4 GIS 2 3 4 5 2 Z Q Z Z(V,Q) V n v i V := n i=1 v i Q Z Z(V,0) = 0 i Z(V,0)/ v i =0 Z 5 x i l i U i (x i,l i,z(v,q),v i ) Q i U i (x i,l i,z(v,0),v i )/ v i =0 c i m i t v w i y i V i max U i (x i,l i,z(v,q),v i ) (2.1) x i,l i,v i ( s. t. y i + w i t l i v i v ) im i x i + c iv i (2.2) t v t v x i 0, t > l i 0, t > v i 0 (2.3) 3 CVM Swallow and Woudyalew[13] Echessah et al.[8] Hadker et al.[9] Kamuanga et al.[11] 4 GIS [15] 5 Andreoni[1] impurely altruistic 2

t x i l i v i (2.2) y i + w i t x i + w i l i +(c i /t v + w i + w i m i /t v )v i c i /t v + w i + w i m i /t v v i w i w i { L(x i,l i,v i )=U i (x i,l i,z(v,q),v i )+λ y i + w i (t l i v i ) x i c } iv i (2.4) t v L = U i λ 0, x i 0 (2.5) x i x i L = U i λw i 0, l i 0 (2.6) l i l i L = U i v i Z Z + U ( i ci λ + w i + w ) im i 0, v i 0 (2.7) v i v i t v t v L λ = w(t l i v i ) x i cv i 0, λ 0 (2.8) (2.7) v i > 0 c i + w i + w ( im i Ui = t v t v Z Z V + U ) / i λ (2.9) v i U i / x i > 0 x i > 0 (2.5) λ (2.9) v i c i /t v + w i + w i m i /t v v i (2.9) x i l i v i x i (2.9) c i /t v + w i + w i m i /t v v i v i 2 Z/ vi 2 < 0 2 U i / Z 2 < 0 2 U i / vi 2 < 0 x i l i v i V i (2.1) (2.2) (2.3) V i i 6 Q =0 Q =0 Z/ v i =0 U i / v i =0 (2.7) v i =0 x i c i /t v + w i + w i m i /t v w i 6 Bergstrom, Blume, and Varian[4] 3

1 x i v i (2.2) (v i,x i ) (t v (t + l i )/(t v + m i ),y i c i (t + l i )/(t v + m i )) l i v i l i y i =0 4 1 w i w i x i 0 v i tv(t + l i),y i ci(t + l i) t v + m i t v + m i 1: w i 2 w i 4

x i 0 v i tv(t + l i),y i ci(t + l i) t v + m i t v + m i 2: w i v = v(c i /t v + w i + w i m i /t v ) c i /t v + w i + w i m i /t v 3 7 Poisson regression model Prob(Y i = y i )= exp( λ i)λ yi i y i! y i =0, 1, 2 (3.1) ln λ i = x iβ (3.2) Y i i y i x i i β x i Y i λ i β (3.2) λ i (3.2) (3.3) 7 Cameron and Trivedi[6] ln λ i = x iβ + ε i (3.3) 5

ε i exp(ε i ) 1 α i.i.d. exp(ε i ) Y i ( ) Prob(Y i = y i )= Γ(α 1 + y i ) α 1 α 1 ( ) yi λ i Γ(α 1 )Γ(y i +1) α 1 + λ i α 1 + λ i y i =0, 1, 2 (3.4) ln λ i = x iβ (3.5) negative binomial regression model Y i λ i λ i (1 + αλ i ) exp(ε i ) α overdispersion α 0 (3.3) ε i σ 2 i.i.d. exp(ε i ) exp(σ 2 /2) σ 2 (exp(σ 2 ) 1) i.i.d. Y i Prob(Y i = y i )= Prob(Y i ε i ) 1 ( σ φ εi ) dε i σ y i =0, 1, 2 (3.6) ln λ i = x i β (3.7) Prob(Y i ε i ) φ( ) Poisson-(log)normal mixture model Poisson-gamma mixture model Y i λ i exp(σ 2 /2) λ i exp(σ 2 /2) + λ 2 i (exp(2σ2 ) exp(σ 2 )) σ σ 0 4 4.1 8 20ha 8 9 8 10 8 29ha 6

4.2 1999 1999 1131 1128 1999 51 51 4.3 GIS 9 JMC GIS CSV 10 ESRI Arc View 3.2 GIS UTM 53 11 2002 3 3: 9 GIS Bateman et al.[2] Bateman et al.[3] 10 URL http://spat.csis.u-tokyo.ac.jp/cgi-bin/geocode.cgi 11 UTM 180 6 32-36 132-138 NI-53 UTM 53 135 7

4.4 2 i TRC i VLC i TMC i TRC i = d ig f (4.1) VLC i = w i h (4.2) TRC i = d iw i s (4.3) d i i g f w i i h s d i w i d i w i i 1999 12 g 1999 95.25 13 f 11 33.3km/h 14 h 4 s 1999 10 15 13.2km/l 15 VLC i TMC i v = v(θ 1 TRC i +θ 2 VLC i +θ 3 TMC i ) θ 1 θ 2 θ 3 θ 2 /θ 1 θ 3 /θ 1 VLC i TMC i 16 (4.1) (4.2) (4.3) TMC i = f sgh TRC i VLC i (4.4) TRC i VLC i TMC i (4.4) TMC i TRC i VLC i 5 5.1 3 TRC VLC TMC AIC AIC 1 12 2001 12 5 1839.6 13 http://oil-info.ieej.or.jp/ 14 http://www.kkr.mlit.go.jp/ 15 http://www.mlit.go.jp/jidosha/nenpi/nenpilist/nenpilist.html 16 McConnel and Strand[12] 8

1: t t t constant 8.127 2.060 8.127 2.020 8.127 2.882 TRC 10 3 7.181 9.273 7.181 4.679 7.181 9.948 VLC 10 3 2.222 2.411 2.222 2.412 2.222 3.465 TMC 2 10 7 0.367 5.742 0.367 2.952 0.367 4.996 VLC 2 10 7 1.313 2.596 1.313 2.657 1.313 3.854 overdispersion 4.947 4.468 0.569 9.459 491.942 332.925 424.875 AIC 993.884 677.849 861.751 AIC TRC VLC VLC TRC V = exp( 0.0000001081VLC 2 +0.002222VLC 13.6131) (5.1) V = exp(0.000002910trc 2 0.007181TRC+1.2737) (5.2) 4 voluntary labor cost 8000 10000 12000 travel cost 0 500 1000 1500 0.02 0.04 0.06 0.08 0.10 number of activities 0.0 0.05 0.10 0.15 0.20 0.25 number of activities (a) VLC (b) TRC 4: (a) VLC (b) TRC 5.2 9

1 Prob(Y i = y i Y i > 0) = Prob(Y i = y i ) Prob(Y i > 0) = ln λ i = x iβ exp( λ i )λ yi i y i!{1 exp( λ i )} y i =0, 1, 2 (5.3) 2 (5.4) 2: t t t TRC 10 3 1.339 1.646 TMC 10 3 0.144 4.330 0.123 2.689 VLC 10 3 0.211 9.554 0.172 2.907 0.195 6.841 overdispersion 0.984 1.134 0.460 3.029 104.807 95.748 104.502 AIC 213.614 197.496 215.004 AIC VLC TRC V = exp(0.0001715vlc 0.7843) (5.5) V = exp( 0.001339TRC+ 1.4230) (5.6) 5 voluntary labor cost 8000 10000 12000 travel cost 0 200 400 600 800 1000 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 3.5 4.0 4.5 number of activities 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 3.5 4.0 number of activities (a) VLC (b) TRC 5: 10

TRC VLC 5.3 TRC 1 TRC V = exp(ˆα + ˆβTRC) TRC i i CS i CS i = TRC i exp(ˆα + ˆβTRC)dT RC (5.7) = 1ˆβ exp(ˆα + ˆβTRC i ) (5.8) = 1ˆβ V (TRC i ) (5.9) CS i /V (TRC i ) 1/ ˆβ 2 747 6 Bockstael, Strand, and Hanemann[5] [1] Andreoni, J., Impure Altruism and Donations to Public Goods: A Theory of Warm-glow Giving, The Economic Journal, Vol.100, 1990, pp.464-477. [2] Bateman, I.J., A.P.Jones, A.A.Lovett, I.R.Lake, and B.H.Day, Applying Geographical Information Systems(GIS) to Environmental and Resource Economics, Environmental and Resource Economics, Vol.22, 2002, pp.219-269. [3] Bateman, I.J., A.A.Lovett, J.S.Brainard, Applied Environmental Economics: A GIS Approach to Costbenefit Analysis, Cambridge Univ. Press, 2003. 11

[4] Bergstrom, T., L.Blume, and H.Varian, On the Private Provision of Public Goods, Journal of Public Economics, Vol.29, 1986, pp.25-49. [5] Bockstael, N.F., I.E.Strand, and W.M.Hanemann, Time and the Recreational Demand, American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Vol.69, 1987, pp.293-302. [6] Cameron, A.C. and P.K.Trivedi, Regression Analysis of Count Data, Cambridge Univ. Press, 1999. [7] Duncan, B., Modeling Charitable Contributions of Time and Money, Journal of Public Economics, Vol.72, 1999, pp.213-242. [8] Echessah, P.N., B.M.Swallow, D.W.Kamara, and J.J.Curry, Willingness to Contribute Labor and Money to Tsetse Control: Application of Contingent Valuation in Busia District, Kenya, World Development, Vol.25, 1997, pp.239-253. [9] Hadker, N., S.Sharma, A.David, and T.R.Muraleedharan, Willingness to Pay for Borivi National Park: Evidence from a Contingent Valuation, Ecological Economnics, Vol.21, 1997, pp.105-122. [10] 2002 [11] Kamuanga, M., B.M.Swallow, H.Sigue, and B.Bauer, Evaluating Contingent and Actual Contributions to a Local Public Good: Tsetse Control in the Yale Agro-pastoral Zone, Burkina Faso, Ecological Economnics, Vol.39, 2001, pp.115-130. [12] McConnel,K.E. and I.Strand, Measuring the Cost of Time in Recreation Demand Analysis: An Application to Sportfishing, American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Vol.63, 1981, pp.153-156. [13] Swallow, B.M. and M.Woudyalew, Evaluating Willingness to Contribute to a Local Public Good: Application of Contingent Valuation to Tsetse Control in Ethiopia, Ecological Economnics, Vol.11, 1994, pp.153-161. [14] 2001 [15] GIS, 1999 12