20/September/ (2007) (2007) Berger- ( 2000) Cinii 8 Sociological Abstracts relative deprivation ) *1 (2007) *2 2 4 δ Boudon-Kosaka

Similar documents
MertonMerton

, , % :


GJG160842_O.QXD

@08460025ヨコ/伊東 217号

_16_.indd

untitled

02_加藤氏_4.indd

H1-H4_政経研究_51-3.ai

ハイコミットメントモデルの有効性についての考察 

政治参加としての自治・町内会参加者の実証分析

02古郡氏李氏_a_4.indd

DP

Japanese Journal of Applied Psychology


Juntendo Medical Journal

公務員倫理問題への新アプローチ

untitled

”Лï‡Æ™²“¸_‚æ4“ƒ__‘dflÅPDF‘‚‡«‘o‡µ.pdf

橡同居選択における所得の影響(DP原稿).PDF

untitled

18 BS BS BS Equivocation Theory Feldman et al マスメディアの 影 響 力 Lazarsfeld et.al., 1944 Two-Step Flow of

Japanese Journal of Applied Psychology

2 251 Barrera, 1986; Barrera, e.g., Gottlieb, 1985 Wethington & Kessler 1986 r Cohen & Wills,

28 Vol. 43 No. 1 2 Burchardt, Le Grand & Piachaud 1999 Bradshaw et al Gordon et al.2000 Whelan et al.2002 poverty de

Taro 議員関係09.PDF

= : : = : : : 14


精神障害者

評論・社会科学 116号(P)Y☆/1.郭

Newgarten, BL., Havighrst, RJ., & Tobin, S.Life Satisfaction Index-A LSIDiener. E.,Emmons,R.A.,Larsen,R.J.,&Griffin,S. The Satisfaction With Life Scal

2 DV 3. セックス ワーク論, 2005, 職業スティグマ Goffman 1963 Dirty WorkHugher, 1951; 1958; 1962 Dirty Work Ashforth & Kreiner 1999 Dirty Work prestige 3 dimen

56 56 The Development of Preschool Children s Views About Conflict Resolution With Peers : Diversity of changes from five-year-olds to six-year-olds Y

表紙_目次.PDF

untitled

12-特集08.indd

_02新井.indd


日本における結婚観の変化―JGSS累積データ を用いた分析―


評論・社会科学 85号(よこ)(P)/3.佐分

Future like ours FLO Don Marquis, Why AborBon is Immoral, The Journal of Philosophy, vol.86,

Managed Heart 1 29

88 Merton 1957(orig. 1949): : Twitter Facebook SNS twilog 1 G. H. Mead

O1-1 O1-2 O1-3 O1-4 O1-5 O1-6

Hi-Stat Discussion Paper Series No.248 東京圏における 1990 年代以降の住み替え行動 住宅需要実態調査 を用いた Mixed Logit 分析 小林庸平行武憲史 March 2008 Hitotsubashi University Research Unit

,,.,,.,..,.,,,.,, Aldous,.,,.,,.,,, NPO,,.,,,,,,.,,,,.,,,,..,,,,.,


04-p45-67cs5.indd

101†^›ªŒ{‘~”q.pwd

1 No.3

73 ハイエク 自由の条件 にみる累進課税批判 福田あつ美 4 年 flat rate progressive rate

SH (2004)GSE GSE SH GSESH GSE SHGSE SHGSE II A Y T J W (1) 103


わが国企業による資金調達方法の選択問題

untitled

ABSTRACT

日歯雑誌(H19・5月号)済/P6‐16 クリニカル  柿木 5

+深見将志.indd

Jpn. J. Personality 19(2): (2010)


†sŸ_Ł¶†t„µŠlŁª(P2†`P24)/‘ã−C”s‡É‡¨‡¯‡éfiñ‘dŸJfiŁ”s‘ê‡Ì”À‘Ø„¤‰ƒ

1 [1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 8, 9, 10, 12, 15] The Boston Public Schools system, BPS (Deferred Acceptance system, DA) (Top Trading Cycles system, TTC) cf. [13] [

情報化社会に関する全国調査中間報告書

3.k.indd

289号/2‐林

Winter 図 1 図 OECD OECD OECD OECD 2003

Core Ethics Vol. : Esping-Andersen = : : : ; : ; : abuse fraud Cohen [ ] : : -

_01野口.indd

高齢者のQuality of Lifeに関する研究

遺産相続、学歴及び退職金の決定要因に関する実証分析 『家族関係、就労、退職金及び教育・資産の世代間移転に関する世帯アンケート調査』

日本の高齢者世帯の貯蓄行動に関する実証分析

03.indd

untitled

Jpn. J. Personality 18(2): (2009)

(2) (3) 2 vs vs (9) Edward Mansfield and Jack Snyder, Democratization and War, Foreign Affairs, Vol. 74, No

2

COE-RES Discussion Paper Series Center of Excellence Project The Normative Evaluation and Social Choice of Contemporary Economic Systems Graduate Scho

*._.W.\..Vol.8-2/1-4/SFG


September VOL.160

:. Bowlby, J Ainsworth, M. S. Main, M. Morgan, H. Ainsworth, M. S. D Main, M. Morgan, H.

Library and Information Science No


卒論本文(最新)

untitled

第3章.DOC


評論・社会科学 124号(P)☆/1.鰺坂

人文論究65‐1(よこ)(P)/8.国清

日本労働研究機構『IT活用企業についての実態調査』及び

社会学部紀要 120号☆/9.池内

1 2 : etc = x(t + 1) = 1 ax(t) 2 + y(t) y(t + 1) = bx(t) x y 2006 p.2/58

132 Camerer (2003) Chen, Lakshminarayanan and Santos (2006) fmri ventral stiatum Fliessbach K., Weber B., Trautner P., Dohmen T., Sunde U., Elger C. E

Title ベンチャー企業の研究開発支出の決定要因 日本と台湾の事例を中心に Author(s) 蘇, 顯揚 Citation 經濟論叢 (1996), 158(1): Issue Date URL Right

1. 2. (Rowthorn, 2014) / 39 1

Stepwise Chow Test * Chow Test Chow Test Stepwise Chow Test Stepwise Chow Test Stepwise Chow Test Riddell Riddell first step second step sub-step Step

社会学批評 6号☆/中トビラ1

The Japanese Journal of Psychology 1999, Vol. 70, No. 1, 9-16 Spontaneous formation of generalized exchange system: An experimental study of discrimin

人文論究60-2(よこ)(P)☆/2.中島

Transcription:

20/September/2009 1 (2007) (2007) Berger- ( 2000) Cinii 8 Sociological Abstracts relative deprivation 98 2009 9 11 ) *1 (2007) *2 2 4 δ Boudon-Kosaka (Kosaka 1986) Boudon-Kosaka- ) 1 1 3 Boudon-Kosaka (Kosaka 1986) 4 δ Boudon-Kosaka 5 6 1 3 1 4 6 Boudon-Kosaka 1 2.1 1 3 (2007) 48 @ tarohmaru.h@hs2.ecs.kyoto-u.ac.jp *1 *2 (2000) (2009) 1

1. SSM2005 2. The American Soldier 3 1. 2. / 3. *3 1 2 1 Boudon-Kosaka 2 Boudon-Kosaka 3 Boudon-Kosaka 3 4 *4 2.2 1 (2007) Sociological Abstracts 3 T. R. Gurr (1969) (well-being) J. G. Bernburg et al. (2009); D. C. Feldman & W. H. Turnley (2004) P. Townsend (1979) *3 A. L. Stinchcombe (1968); (1998); P. D. Reynolds (1971,); G. C. Homans (1967=1981); J. Berger et al. (2005); J. Berger & M. Zelditch (1993); G. Jasso (2004) *4 ( 2007) (2009) 2

( + ) γ 1 Boudon-Kosaka (2007) 3 (2007) 3 SSM2005 3.1 V Boudon-Kosaka γ S S 1 γ γ S. A. Stouffer et al. (1949) 2 Stouffer Do you think a soldier with ability has a good chance of promotion in the Army? 3

2 1944 Stouffer et al. (1949: p.253) Chart IX Feldman & Turnley (2004) J. Olson et al. (1995) 5 1. (job situation) 2. (ought to) 3. (angry or upset)? (Tilly 1978; Skocpol 1979) 3, 4 SSM2005 *5 20 70 1 *5 SSM2005 2005 (2007); (2008); (2008) 4

3 4 0 Boudon-Kosaka- R Boudon-Kosaka- 3.2 δ δ 1 5

1 1 2 3 1 2 3 (Intercept) 2.979 2.906 2.907 2.371 2.277 2.274 (0.082) (0.084) (0.085) (0.098) (0.101) (0.102) 0.283 (0.053) 0.316 (0.053) 0.316 (0.053) 0.470 (0.063) 0.513 (0.064) 0.513 (0.064) /10 0.086 0.121 0.121 0.062 0.107 0.107 (0.022) (0.023) (0.024) (0.026) (0.028) (0.028) ( /10) 2 0.049 0.050 0.050 0.078 0.079 0.080 (0.015) (0.015) (0.015) (0.019) (0.019) (0.019) 0.038 (0.072) 0.044 (0.072) 0.044 (0.072) 0.011 (0.087) 0.019 (0.087) 0.019 (0.087) 0.029 (0.102) 0.012 (0.102) 0.012 (0.102) 0.158 (0.122) 0.137 (0.122) 0.137 (0.122) 0.161 (0.089) 0.129 (0.089) 0.130 (0.089) 0.161 (0.107) 0.120 (0.107) 0.120 (0.107) 0.169 (0.131) 0.146 (0.131) 0.146 (0.131) 0.005 (0.157) 0.024 (0.157) 0.025 (0.157) 0.020 (0.063) 0.002 (0.063) 0.002 (0.063) 0.044 (0.076) 0.072 (0.076) 0.072 (0.076) 0.251 (0.093) 0.243 (0.093) 0.243 (0.093) 0.335 (0.112) 0.325 (0.112) 0.325 (0.112) 0.028 (0.055) 0.006 (0.056) 0.005 (0.056) 0.043 (0.066) 0.085 (0.067) 0.086 (0.067) /10 0.036 0.034 0.034 0.033 0.030 0.030 (0.030) (0.030) (0.030) (0.036) (0.036) (0.036) 100 0.037 (0.012) 0.033 (0.012) 0.033 (0.012) 0.104 (0.014) 0.099 (0.014) 0.099 (0.014) 0.077 (0.020) 0.073 (0.055) 0.098 (0.024) 0.108 (0.066) 2 0.001 (0.016) 0.003 (0.019) adj. R-squared 0.035 0.041 0.040 0.055 0.061 0.061 AIC 6539 6526 6528 7391 7376 7378 N 2333 2333 2333 2333 2333 2333 δ 3.3? Boudon-Kosaka- S. C. Stanley et al. (1986) = Boudon-Kosaka- 4 The American Soldier Stouffer et al. (1949) Boudon-Kosaka- 6

2 β Std. Error 0.78*** 0.09 0.77*** 0.11 0.70*** 0.09 0.06 0.10 1.69*** 0.10 2.11*** 0.11 *** p <.001 3 (%) 1 2 3 1 2 3 18 18 30 31 18 18-30 31 10 32 62 6 20 40 17 29 19 12 26 22 73 39 19 82 54 38 100 100 100 100 100 100 Stouffer et al. (1949: p.240) Chart VI private PFC 4.1 2 2 BIC AIC 2 (Stouffer et al. 1949: p.251) Boudon-Kosaka- (Stouffer et al. 1949: p.247-250) Boudon-Kosaka- 3 18 73% 18 30 39% (73-39)/73=47% *6 4 3 5 8 13 Boudon-Kosaka- *6 7

4 1 2 2 3 1 2 2 3 1.29 1.03 1.17 0.77 0.47 0.51 0.34 0.30 3 Boudon-Kosaka- Boudon-Kosaka- 4.2 Boudon-Kosaka- 5 5 1 Boudon-Kosaka- (exp(0.210) = 1.2 ) 5 2 Boudon-Kosaka- 5 SSM2005 Boudon-Kosaka- The American Soldier Boudon-Kosaka- Boudon-Kosaka- 8

5 Stouffer et al. (1949: p.246) Table 5 2005, 2007, 2005 SSM 2005 Berger, J., D. Willer, & M. Zelditch, 2005, Theory Programs and Theoretical Problems, Sociological Theory, 23(2): 127 55. Berger, J. & M. Zelditch, 1993, Orienting Strategies and Theory Growth, J. Berger & M. Zelditch eds., Theoretical Research Programs: Studies in the Growth of Theory, Stanford University Press, 3 19. Bernburg, J. G., T. Thorlindsson, & I. D. Sigfusdottir, 2009, Relative Deprivation and Adolescent Outcomes in Iceland: A Multilevel Test, Social Forces, 87(3): 1223 50. Feldman, D. C. & W. H. Turnley, 2004, Contingent Employment in Academic Careers: Relative Deprivation among Adjunct Faculty, Journal of Vocational Behavior, 64(2): 284 307. Gurr, T. R., 1969, Why Men Rebel, Princeton University Press., 2007, : Homans, G. C., 1967, The Nature of Social Science, Harcourt. 1981,. Jasso, G., 2004, The Tripartite Structure of Social Science Analysis, Sociological Theory, 22(3): 401 31. Kosaka, K., 1986, A Model of Relative Deprivation, Journal of Mathematical Sociology, 12(1): 35 48., 2000, FK, 2008, SSM2005 2005 SSM 1 2005 SSM 2005 SSM, 1 15 9

5 1 2 (Intercept) 1.291 1.125 (0.085) (0.135) 1.922 1.310 (0.105) (0.186) 1.181 0.922 (0.083) (0.160) 0.704 0.875 (0.083) (0.172) 0.185 0.022 (0.069) (0.149) 0.210 0.216 (0.069) (0.069) 0.972 (0.229) 0.355 (0.187) 0.261 (0.197) Nagelkerke R 2 0.125 0.134 Deviance 5989 5952 AIC 6001 5970 BIC 6039 6029 N 4725 4725 *** p <.001, ** p <.01, 2007,, 2008, 2005 SSM 2005 SSM 1 2005 SSM 2005 SSM, 17 29 Olson, J., N. Roesesc, J. Meen, & D. Robertson, 1995, The Preconditions and Consequences of Relative Deprivation: Two Field Studies 1, Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 25(11): 944 64. Reynolds, P. D., 1971,, A Primer in Theory Construction, Boston: Allyn and Bacon., 1998, 49(2): 188 205 Skocpol, T., 1979, State and Social Revolution, New York: Cambridge University Press. Stanley, S. C., J. G. Hunt, & L. L. Hunt, 1986, The Relative Deprivation of Husbands in Dual-Earner Households, Journal of Family Issues, 7(1): 3 20. Stinchcombe, A. L., 1968, Constructing Social Theories, Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Stouffer, S. A., E. A. Suchman, L. C. DeVinney, S. A. Star, & R. M. Williams, 1949, American Soldier vol.1: Adjustment During Army Life, Princeton University Press., 2009, -, 2009, Tilly, C., 1978, From Mobilization to Revolution, Random House. 10

Townsend, P., 1979, Poverty in the United Kingdom: a survey of household resources and standards of living, Penguin Books Ltd. 11