日本の出生率低下の要因分析:実証研究のサーベイと政策的含意の検討



Similar documents
Becker 1965 Gronau a a a

表紙_目次.PDF

産業・企業レベルデータで見た日本の経済成長.pdf

..,,...,..,...,,.,....,,,.,.,,.,.,,,.,.,.,.,,.,,,.,,,,.,,, Becker., Becker,,,,,, Becker,.,,,,.,,.,.,,

2) 3) 2) Ohkusa, 1996 ; 1999 ; Ohtake and Ohkusa, 1994 ; La Croix and A. Kawamura, Reject American Economic Review, Journal of Political Econom

untitled

日本における結婚観の変化―JGSS累積データ を用いた分析―

ミクロ・データによる家計行動分析: 将来不安と予備的貯蓄

日本の教育経済学:実証分析の展望と課題.pdf

448 Vol. 44 No 図

橡同居選択における所得の影響(DP原稿).PDF

untitled

Ishi

46−ª3�=4�“ƒ‚S“·‚Ö‡¦

Title ベンチャー企業の研究開発支出の決定要因 日本と台湾の事例を中心に Author(s) 蘇, 顯揚 Citation 經濟論叢 (1996), 158(1): Issue Date URL Right

- March IMF IMF IMF ITO The General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade

少子化の動向と出生率に関する研究サーベイ

デフレ不況下の金融政策をめぐる政治過程

untitled

【表紙】経済学論叢_18号/表1・3・背

,.,,.,. NIRA,.,.,,, GDP.,., 1%, 2.0% 3).,,.,,., 1, 4).,,.,, GDP,.,,.,,,.,,., 2002.,,., 3), Q&A Q16 (

ボーナス制度と家計貯蓄率-サーベイ・データによる再検証-

自殺の経済社会的要因に関する調査研究報告書

GDPギャップと潜在成長率

DP

時間割引:双曲割引と弱加法性

1: 合計特殊出生率 出生率の推移 暦年 アメリカドイツフランス スウェーデン日本 Apps and Re



,,,

橡DP9802.PDF

公務員倫理問題への新アプローチ

Winter 図 1 図 OECD OECD OECD OECD 2003


Psacharopulos Psacharopulos and Patrinos (1) Byron and Takahashi McMahon and Boediono Duflo (2)

Microsoft Word - KUES-DP docx

JSPS Grants-in-Aid for Creative Scientific Research Understanding Inflation Dynamics of the Japanese Economy Working Paper Series No.7 日本家計の消費 貯蓄 労働プロ

日本労働研究機構『IT活用企業についての実態調査』及び

2 / 24

開発金融増刊号

日本の世帯属性別貯蓄率の動向について:アップデートと考察

Microsoft Word - KUES-DP docx

日本の高齢者世帯の貯蓄行動に関する実証分析

評論・社会科学 116号(P)Y☆/1.郭

SNAと家計調査における貯蓄率の乖離-日本の貯蓄率低下の要因-

Walter et al. 2009: 1 Helleiner 1994 Strange 1971: Gilpin 1987: -65 Strange b, 1998c,


第2章 経済成長と所得分配: マレーシアの事例を中心に

COE-RES Discussion Paper Series Center of Excellence Project The Normative Evaluation and Social Choice of Contemporary Economic Systems Graduate Scho

†sŸ_Ł¶†t„µŠlŁª(P2†`P24)/‘ã−C”s‡É‡¨‡¯‡éfiñ‘dŸJfiŁ”s‘ê‡Ì”À‘Ø„¤‰ƒ

論文08.indd

BB 報告書完成版_修正版) doc


SUSENAS Kor Modul (2) (3) (4)

, FAD FAD FED FAO FAO WFP 1999 NGO ) 1. FAD FAD 1999 Lee, FAD % national coping s

untitled

Stepwise Chow Test * Chow Test Chow Test Stepwise Chow Test Stepwise Chow Test Stepwise Chow Test Riddell Riddell first step second step sub-step Step

Microsoft Word - Šv”|“Å‘I.DOC

高齢化とマクロ投資比率―国際パネルデータを用いた分析―


p *2 DSGEDynamic Stochastic General Equilibrium New Keynesian *2 2

5 I The Current Situation and Future Prospects of the North Korean Economy presented at the 2014 Korea Dialogue Conference on Strengthenin

possibilism Development Projects Observed 5


わが国企業による資金調達方法の選択問題

160_cov.indd



.,,..,,.,..,,,,,,,,.,,,.,,,.,,,.,.,,,,,.,,.,.,.,,.,,,.,., --.,,,,,.,,.

財政赤字の経済分析:中長期的視点からの考察


And Business

_16_.indd

Autumn II III Zon and Muysken 2005 Zon and Muysken 2005 IV II 障害者への所得移転の経済効果 分析に用いるデータ

物価指数の計測誤差と品質調整手法:わが国CPIからの教訓

,,.,,.,..,.,,,.,, Aldous,.,,.,,.,,, NPO,,.,,,,,,.,,,,.,,,,..,,,,.,

村本 孜51‐85/51‐85

Preliminary Version Manning et al. (1986) Rand Health Insurance Experiment Manning et al. (1986) 3 Medicare Me

JICA JETRO

RIETI Highlight VOL.25

「リストラ中高年」の行方

橡浅川美和子.PDF


Masanori Hashimoto Rene Fahr and Hilmar Schneider 1. Hashimoto, Masanori Fahr, Rene and Hilmar Schneider Hashimoto, Masanori 2004 Fahr

=

2 100 BTU 2

<93638CB48FBA8E6C2E696E6464>

商学 63‐3☆/6.山本


遺産相続、学歴及び退職金の決定要因に関する実証分析 『家族関係、就労、退職金及び教育・資産の世代間移転に関する世帯アンケート調査』

国際学研究 2‐1☆/目次(2‐1)

物価変動の決定要因について ― 需給ギャップと物価変動の関係の国際比較を中心に―

201/扉

02古郡氏李氏_a_4.indd

60 Vol. 44 No. 1 2 準市場 化の制度的枠組み: 英国 教育改革法 1988 の例 Education Reform Act a School Performance Tables LEA 4 LEA LEA 3

<90AD8DF489C88A D322E696E6462>

政治参加としての自治・町内会参加者の実証分析

日本は今なお熟練労働集約的な財を純輸出しているか?



Transcription:

ESRI Discussion Paper Series No.94 by April 2004 Economic and Social Research Institute Cabinet Office Tokyo, Japan

1 2 3 1 2 240 0061 3051 045-337-2998, E-mail: yusuke_date@ hotmail.com 3

2002 1.32 70 3

1 2002 1.32 2002 20 1990 20 30 30 2002 1,153,866 1899 1920 3.62% 2% 90 40 35 15 65 15 65 1998 4 2 30 4 United Nations (2002)

Kosai et.al. (1998) 2003 Hotz, Klerman and Willis1996 The Economics of Fertility in Developed Countries Handbook of Population and Family Economics pp.275-347 Arroyo and Zhang(1997) Dynamic microeconomic models of fertility choice: A survey Journal of Population Economics, vol.10, pp.23-6 2002 2001 2002

2 1 5 6 1925 5.11 1939 3.74 1940 1947 1949 4.54 10 1957 2.04 replacement ratio 2.08 1966 2 1967 1 2 1971 1974 2 19 2 1870 7 3 demographic transition 1880 1920 37.3 2002 1920 1 8 5 2001 6 (total fertility rate) 15 49 1 7 1872 3480 1887 2002 8 2

19812001 1938 2 3 1 1947 1960 33.5 16.8 14.6 7.6 2 1 1970 2 the second demographic transition 9 1970 3 1950 4 1950 2 5 1960 4%1970 1 60 70 3 1960 20 90 2 70 90 3 1995 3 1975 10 2 3 9 2000 10 1992 1969 7074 7579 80 92 80 75 3 90 3

1995 2 3 1990 1 4 1980 90 3 5 11 1 1971 4 70 0.39 0.24 80 3 6 11 Crude Birth Rate Crude Marriage Rate

80 70 2024 6180 20 20 20 20 20 20 62 30 1 71 1990 20 30 90 30 2000 20 30 72 30 20 20 35 75 1996 12 8 12

49 1930 1950 1950 49 2 35 1965 35 1.46 1955 35 1.89 13 30 2 2001 3 32 6 1970 1970 3 80 97 0.26 1999 14 13 2001 2 30.53 3 32.59 4 34.33 14 1997 1.39 196570 0.26

3 31. Malthus 20011 1950 H. Leibenstein Becker R.A. Easterlin 2 1 9 1 H. Leibenstein 3 1 2

15 Becker(1960, 1991) Quality-Quantity Model Becker 16 30 2 2003 Becker Willis(1973) Willis 2003 28 34 8500 17 Willis 15 2001 3 2 16 17 2 3,800 2004 1 200 2,500

Becker and Lewis(1981)Becker (1988) Becker and Barro(1988) and Becker(1989) altruism 1992 Becker, Murphy and Tamura (1990) 18 Barro(1991) GDP 19 20 18 Lucas 1988 19 GDP 1960-85 GDP 60 GDP 20 Yamauchi and Senda (2003)1910

Schultz (1973) Human Capital Theory Theory of the Allocation of Time Household Production Function Easterlin(1969, 1973) 2 70 Becker1973 Becker

21 3 1 2 2 3 22 23 101 2 1977 2002 2 21 Becker 1999 22 23 2003

Easterlin(1969) 70 102 24 24 1999 3

3 2. (1) (2) (3) 25 (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) (9) 1 1 (1) (6) (7) (9) Butz and Ward 1 Butz and Ward(1979) f m m f m m W K Y Y K W K Y K Y K B ln ln ln ) (1 ln ln 3 2 1 0 3 2 1 0 γ γ γ γ β β β β + + + = + + + = B m Y f W K ( ) 2 4 3 0 0,, 0 3 3 2 2 2 1 1 < = > = > + = γ β γ β γ γ β Butz and Ward 25

Ogawa and Mason(1986) Butz and Ward Ogawa and Mason 26 1966 1983 Ohbuchi(1982, 1988), (1996) 1950 1983 1968 1994 2001 Butz and Ward 27 28 26 Kramer and Neusser (1984) 10 1 100 1 27 1999 28 2001

1993 10 1997 8 1 29 1 111 1564 30 2001 1564 64.4% 111 6 6 111 112 2 6 29 2 30 1981, 1986, 1991, 1996, 2001 OECD 1981

2 31 Ohbuchi(1988) 1950 1983 19931960 1980 199270 85 32 1996 33 31 Ohbuchi (1982) 32 1960 60 33 1999 1998

1996 34 2000 35 1996 1993 1992 20 1999 Ohbuchi(1982) 1954 1980 36 34 1999 35 36

1999 Ohbuchi(1982) Ohbuchi(1988) 1998 1998 1998 2000 1999 19 25 2002 Heckman

37 38 1999 39 40 Ohbuchi (1988) 1996 2004 37 2003 38 39 1999 40 2000 1996

1999 1999 2 2000 41 1 1999 1 2 3 1 2 2 2 3 3 2000 41 Bivariate probit 2000

2529 2529 1999 58 5 0.09 3 0.18 2003 3 1999

1997 Oyama (2001)

4 (1) (2) (3) sample selection bias endogeneity bias 2004 42 42 1999 1993

2003 9 2 43 44 45 46 47 48 43 44 45 46 1992 1994 2003 3 3 3 47 2002 1998 48

1999 49 1996 Waldfogel1997 2001 1998 Waldfogel1997 50 1999 2000 1999 6 14 95.4% 1 2 1997a 02 0 49 1994 50 3

2001 4 1 2 1999 6 0 2000 1999

1995 51 52 53 16 6 54 90 92 1 94 99 40 3 6 2001 51 52 2003 1 2 1 1 5 3 1 1 53 3 1 2 3 54 2004 3 2003

2003 55 2004 3 2004 2010 56 5% 2010 1.51 0.21 2010 5% 2010 1.56 2015 55 1 56 2001 5

5 1980 80 90 1.57 2007 2 1945 200 121122 57 70 3 3 3 3 57 Kohler et. al. (2002) Lowest-Low Fertility

70 80

2003 H11 008 pp.19-38. 1999 48 2 pp.32-36. 1996. (1997) 53 1 pp.3-20. 1998 54 1 pp.1-6. (2000). (2002). (2003) 1 59 1. 1999 34 4 pp.361-373. 1999 18 1 pp.40-46. (1996) = 52 2 pp.30-35. 2001. 2002

( H12- -027) 12. 2003 39 1 pp.55-69. 1997. 1993. 1981. 1998 54 1 pp.88-119. 1993. http://www1.ipss.go.jp/bunken/data/pdf/14209501.pdf. 1996 :. Mason, AndrewTuljapukar, ShripadLi, Nan2003. Decle, Robert(19921970 22 pp.16-76. 1998 40 pp.1-17. 1999 VAR H10- -032.

2000 56 1 pp.38-60. 2001. (2004). 2003. (1997)Economy, Society, Policy 306 pp.66-69.. 2003 2003. 2000. 1998 10. 2002 14. 200212.. (1989) 45 2 pp.15-34. (1995) 42 2 pp.9-14. (2003 14. 1996 45

3 4 pp.65-74. 1998 No.459 pp.39-49. (1999) 35 2 pp.192-207. (2001). (2003) 39 1 pp.43-54. 1998, 46 pp.54-71. 2003 CVM No.83. 2004 No.89. 2000. 1999 34 4 pp.392-401. 1999 H10- -032. 2002.

1999 H10- -032. 2000 51 pp.72-78. 2002 37 4 pp.371-379. 2002 58 1 pp.57-84. 1999 H10- -032pp.137-166. 2000 56 4 pp.1-18. 1995 28 pp.148-161. 1999 34 4 pp.348-360. 1994 40 1 pp.43-56. 1996 41 4 pp.143-156.

2003 15. 1996 55 2 pp.1-18. 1997.a. 1997.b. 1999 5 pp.147-159. 2003 I 2 33 3 pp.325-342. 2002 32 3 pp.279-290. 1992 28 3 pp.246-251. 2002. 1999 pp.147-169. 2000 11 2. 1992 43

3 pp.203-213. (1996) 3. Waldfogel, Jane1997 53 4 pp.49-66. 1999. 1981 158, pp 11-45. 1999 2 pp.21-57. 2003 59 1. 2004 No.48, pp.34-57. 1998 No.459, pp.50-62. 1999 35 1 pp.52-64. 2000 No.860. (1998) 54 1 pp.63-76. 1999

1997 3 151 pp.113-127. 2001) pp.71-88. 1999 35 1 pp.52-64. 1999 19 pp.9-22. 1999 30 4 pp.1127-1153. 2000. 2002 58 pp.36-54. Arroyo, Cristino R. and Zhang, Junsen (1997) Dynamic microeconomic models of fertility choice: A survey Journal of Population Economics, vol.10, pp.23-65. Barro, R. J. (1991) Economic Growth in a Cross Section of Countries, Quarterly Journal of Economics, vol.106, pp.407-444 Barro, R. J. and Becker, G. S. (1989) Fertility Choice in a Model of Economic Growth, Econometrica, vol.57, pp.481-501. Becker, Gary S. (1960) An Economic Analysis of Fertility, in Demographic and Economic Change in Developed Countries, Universities-National Bureau Conference Series, vol.1, Princeton University Press. (1973) A Theory of Marriage: Part 1, Journal of Political Economy, vol.81,

pp.813-846. (1974) A Theory of Marriage: Part 2, Journal of Political Economy, vol.82, pp.11-26. (1991) A Treatise on the Family, second edition, Cambridge, MA, Harvard University Press, (1988) Family Economics and Macrobehavior,American Economic Review, Vol.78,pp.1-13 and Lewis, H. Gregg. (1981) On the Interaction between the Quantity and Quality of Children, Journal of Political Economy, vol. 81, pp.279-288. and Barro, R. J. (1988) A Reformation of the Economic Theory of Fertility, Quarterly Journal of Economics, vol.103, pp.1-25., Kevin Murphy and Robert Tamura(1990) Human Capital, Fertility, and Economic Growth, Journal of Political Economy, vol.98, pp.12-37. Butz, William P. and Ward, Michel P. (1979) The Emergence of Counter-cyclical U.S. Fertility, American Economic Review, vol.69, pp.318-328. Cigno, Alessandro (1991) Economics of Family, Oxford: Clarendon Press. Dasgupta, Partha (1995) The Population Problems: Theory and Evidence, Journal of Economic Literature, vol.18, pp.1879-1902. Easterlin, R.A. (1969) Towards a Socioeconomic Theory of Fertility, S.J. Behrman et al., eds., Fertility and Family Planning: A World View, University of Michigan Press. (1973) Relative Economic Status and the American Fertility Swing, E.B. Sheldon, ed., Family Economic Behavior; Problems and Prospects, Lippincott. Hotz, V. Joseph, Klerman, Jacob Alex and Willis, Robert J. 1996 The Economics of

Fertility in Developed Countries, Handbook of Population and Family Economics, pp.275-347. Kato, Hisakazu (1997) Time Series Analysis of Fertility Change in Postwar Japan, Jinkougaku-kenkyu ( ), vol.20, pp.23-35. Kohler, Hans-Peter, Billari, Francesco and Ortega, José(2002) The Emergence of lowest-low fertility in Europe during 1990s, Population and Development Review, vol.28, pp.641-681. Kosai, Yutaka, Saito, Jun and Yashiro, Naohiro (1998) Dealing Population and Sustained Economic Growth: Can They Coexist? American Economic Review, vol.88, pp.412-416. Kramer, Walter and Neusser, Klaus(1984) The Emergence of Counter-cyclical U.S. Fertility: Note, American Economic Review, vol.74, pp.201-202. Lucas, R. E. Jr. (1988) "On the Mechanics of Economic Development," Journal of Monetary Economics, vol. 22, pp.3-42. Nagase, Nobuko (1997) Wage Differentials and Labour Supply of Married Women in Japan: Part-time and Informal Sector Work Opportunities, Japanese Economic Review, vol.48, No.1 pp.29-42. Nakamura, Jiro (1999) On the Determinants of Career Interruption by Childbirth among Married Women in Japan, Journal of the Japanese and International Economies No.13, pp.73-89. Ogawa, Naohiro and Mason, Andrew(1986) An Economic Analysis of Recent Fertility in Japan: An application of the Butz-Ward Model, Jinkogaku-kennkyu ( ), vol.9, pp.5-14. Ohbuchi, Hiroshi (1982) Empirical Tests of Chicago Model and the Empirical Hypothesis: A Case Study of Japan, Jinkougaku-kenkyu ( ), vol.5, pp.8-16.

(1988) The Quantity and Quality of Children, Labor Supply and Wages of Married Women in Postwar Japan, Jinkougaku-kenkyu ( ), vol.11, pp.5-14. Oyama, Masako (2001) Fertility Decline and Female Labor Force Participation in Japan, Discussion Paper, the Population Research Center at NCOR and University of Chicago Discussion Paper Series. Rosenzweig, Mark R and Schultz, P. (1985) The supply of and Demand for Birth: Fertility and its Life-Cycle Consequences, American Economic Review, vol.75, pp.992-1015. and Schultz, P. (1987) Fertility and Investments in Human Capital: Estimates of the Consequence of Imperfect Fertility Control in Malaysia, Journal of Econometrics, vol.36, pp.163-184., and Oded Stark eds (1997). Handbook of Population and Family Economics, Amsterdom: Elsevier Science B.D.. Schultz, William (1973) The Value of Children: An Economic Perspective, Journal of Political Economy, vol.81, pp.2-13. United Nations (2002) National Population Policies 2001, United Nations Population Division. Waldfogel, Jane, Higuchi, Yoshio and Abe, Masahiro (1999) Family Leave Policies and Women s retention after Childbirth: Evidence from the United States, Britain, and Japan, Journal of Population Economics, vol.12, pp.523-545. Willis, Robert J. (1973) A new approach to the Economic Theory of Fertility Behavior, Journal of Political Economy, vol.81, pp.14-64. Yamauchi, Futoshi and Senda, Tetsuji (2003) Schooling Investment in Girls and Boys: Evidence from Rural Village in Prewar Japan, mimeo. International Food Policy Research Institute, Washington D.C..