-de jure de facto- classification de jure de facto IMF IMF 30 Johnston, IMF 1999 de facto Fear of Floating Fear of Floating middle 1 IMF
|
|
|
- あけなお おおかわち
- 4 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 -de jure de facto- classification de jure de facto IMF IMF 30 Johnston, IMF 1999 de facto Fear of Floating Fear of Floating middle 1 IMF 2003 (with no separate legal tender) 41 7 (Other conventional fixed peg arrangements) 41 within horizontal bands 2 4 flexibility (Crawling pegs) 5 (Crawling bands) 5 (managed floating) 3 50 (independent floating) 34 < >IMF, Annual Report on Exchange Arrangements and Exchange Restrictions fischer(2001) hollowing out of the middle 2 ERM 3 1
2 classification de jure de facto De facto <Reinhart and Rogoff(2004)> 1940 IMF natural classification freely falling regimes IMF limited flexibility < Levy-Yatati, and Sturzenegger LYS(2003)> LYS e e r de facto 1 LYS De Facto Flexible High High Low Intermediate Medium Medium Medium Fixed Low Low High Inconclusive Low Low Low LYS (de facto) Regime All Industrial Non-industrial IMF (de jure) Float Intermediate Fixed 1, Total 2, ,843 2,291 < > Levy-Yatati, and Sturzenegger(2003), p peg % crawling peg 2
3 freely floating SDR CIS option rigidity (real) (nominal) 6 (terms of trade) Barro and Gordon,1983 3
4 flexibility ex. fear of floating fear of floating 8 OCA Mundell,1961 Kenen,1969, McKinnon, Rogoff et al.(2004) Rogoff 10Dual exchange rates Ghosh, Gulde and Wolf(2002) flexibility fear of floating 12 8 Dutch disease 9 10 rogoff et al G3 11 GGW GGW 12 4
5 GDP LYS (2003) GDP (INVGDP) (TT) IMF(De jure) De facto LOLR (original sin) Eichengreen and Hausmann,
6 credibility 90 < > Bordo, Michael D.(2003), Exchange rate regime choice in historical perspective, Working Paper9654,NBER. Broda, Christian(2001), Coping with Term-of-Trade Shocks: Pegs versus Floats, American Economic Review Vol.91 No.2 BubulaAndrea and Otker-robe, Inci(2003), Are Pegged and Intermediate Exchange Rate Regimes More Crises Prone?, IMF Working Paper WP/3/223 Frankel, Jeffrey A.(2003), Experience of and Lessons from Exchange Rate Regimes in Emerging Economics Ghosh, Atish R., Gulde, Anne-Marie, and Wolf, Holger C.(2002), Exchange Rate Regimes: Choices and Consequences The MIT Press Fischer, Stanley(2001), Exchange Rate Regimes: Is the Bipolar View Correct? Johnston, Barry R.(1999), Exchange Rate Arrangements and Currency Convertibility Developments and Issues, IMF World Economic and Financial Surveys Levy-Yatati, Eduardo and Sturzenegger, Federico(2003), To float or to Fix: Evidence on the Impact of Exchange Rate Regimes on Growth, American Economic Review Vol.93 Reinhart, Carmen M. and Rogoff, Kenneth S.(2004), The Modern History of Exchange Rate Arrangements: A Reinterpretation, The Quarterly Journal of Economics Rogoff, Kenneth S., Husain, Aasim M., Mody, Ashoka, Brooks Robin, and Oomes Nienke(2004), Evolution and Performance of Exchange Rate Regimes, IMF Occasional Paper 229 6
7 IMF IMF IMF, IFS Annual Report on Exchange Arrangements and Exchange Restrictions 7
8 Ghosh, Gulde, and Wolf IMF1999, 2003b; Bubula Levy-Yeyati and Reinhart and Rogoff 2003 and Ötker-Robe2002 Sturzenegger , 9 15, , 5 dual/parallel exchange rate IMF IMF freely falling IMF Rogoff et al(2004)p.15 8
9 Peg Limited Managed Flexibility Floating Floating Falling Total Pegged (6.8) (7.9) (10.4) (23.2) (39.9) (6.5) (7.9) Intermediate (3.5) (9.1) (15.1) (3.8) (66.1) (15.9) (10.8) Floating (11.5) (7.5) (8.4) (4.5) (68.6) (22.2) (10.8) Total (6.5) (8.3) (10.8) (4.8) (57.0) < >Rogoff et al(2004),pp (7.6) (8.7) GDP Limited Managed Peg Flexibility Floating Floating Falling Total Pegged (2.0) (2.6) (1.6) (0.5) (-0.7) (0.6) (1.6) Intermediate (2.4) (2.9) (2.1) (2.2) (0.4) (2.7) (2.3) Floating (2.9) (1.8) (2.2) (2.3) (-1.2) (-0.3) (1.7) Total (2.2) (2.6) (2.0) (2.0) (-0.6) (0.6) (1.8) < > Limited Managed Peg Flexibility Floating Floating Falling Total Pegged Intermediate Floating Total < > 3 9
10 Hard peg regimes Dollarization Currency union Currency board Intermediate regimes Conventional fixed peg to a single currency Conventional fixed peg to a basket Horizontal band Crawling peg Forward looking crawling peg Backward looking crawling peg Crawling band Forward looking crawling band Backward looking crawling band Tightly managed floating Other floating regimes Other managed floating Independently floating Memorandum items: All pegged regimes All floating regimes Number of observations 19,853 19,853 7,485 12,368 Number of pressure episodes Bubula and otker-robe(2003) p.13 10
11 Rogoff et al < > Rogoff et al(2004) pp
12 Rogoff et al Per Capita Volatility of Dependent Variable Inflation Real GDP Growth Real GDP Growth Classification De jure Natural De jure Natural De jule Natural Intermediate(de jure) 0.062(6.58)*** 0.000(-0.05) (-0.31) Floating(de jure) 0.062(5.31)*** 0.003(0.57) 0.008(3.11)*** Intermediate(natural) 0.016(2.11)*** 0.000(0.00) 0.005(1.19) 0.045(2.91)*** 0.004(0.47) 0.008(1.24) floating(natural) 0.218(13.51)*** (-3.67)*** 0.012(2.69)*** falling(natural) Money growth (0.83) 0.132(1.05) Real GDP growth (-3.40) (-2.59) Investment ratio (-2.62)*** (-2.83)*** (-0.27) (-0.17) Trade openness 0.022(1.29) 0.027(1.90)* 0.025(2.47)** 0.029(2.94)*** 0.007(1.06) 0.008(1.22) Central turnover rate Terms-of-trade growth bank 0.048(3.34)*** 0.026(2.05)** (-0.25) 0.007(0.39) 0.030(2.09)** 0.026(1.83)* 0.019(2.02)** 0.019(2.02)** Average years of 0.002(-0.83) 0.002(-0.60) 0.004(0.93) 0.004(0.82) schooling Tax ratio 0.004(0.14) (-0.25) (-0.76) (-0.36) Government balance (-4.99)*** (-4.07)*** 0.008(0.25) 0.004(-0.11) (-0.40) (-0.16) Initial income income/u.s (-2.51)** (-2.39)** (-0.40) (0.55) Population growth (-1.68)* (-1.90)* 0.123(1.02) 0.111(0.91) Population size 0.013(1.01) 0.015(1.07) Constant 0.366(7.72)*** 0.090(1.51) 0.091(2.14)** 0.093(2.07)** 0.032(3.72)*** 0.031(2.53)*** Observations 1,946 1,946 1,762 1,762 1,878 1,878 R-squared () *10 **5 ***1% < Rogoff et al(2004), p.41 12
13 9 LYS () () () () () () IMF LYS LYS LYS IMF IMF Base-line Base-line (1) (2) INVGDP 10.01*** 9.83*** 7.06*** 10.36*** 10.29*** 7.73*** (1.74) (1.73) (3.07) (2.01) (2.12) (2.09) POPGR (0.19) (0.19) (0.35) (0.22) (0.21) (0.21) GDP *** -0.43*** -0.34*** -0.77** -0.38** -0.71*** (0.14) (0.13) (0.12) (0.38) (0.19) (0.24) SEC * (1.07) (1.03) (1.11) (1.44) (1.40) (1.60) POP 0.19** ** 0.26** (0.08) (0.08) (0.21) (0.09) (0.12) (0.11) GOV *** -0.92** 4.27** -0.98** -1.10** -3.57*** (0.37) (0.38) (2.11) (0.39) (0.49) (0.98) CIVIL -0.24* -0.24* -0.98*** (0.14) (0.14) (0.23) (0.16) (0.20) (0.17) TT 0.50*** 0.50*** 0.52** 0.49*** 0.53*** 0.82*** (0.10) (0.10) (0.24) (0.11) (0.12) (0.13) OPENFR (1.20) (1.26) (1.15) (1.62) (2.12) (1.19) SAFRICA ** -1.12** * (0.50) (0.47) (0.51) (0.75) (0.61) LATAM -1.02*** -1.11*** -0.96** -1.50*** (0.36) (0.35) (0.38) (0.57) (0.50) TRANS (1.80) (1.70) (1.79) (2.45) (4.93) INT 0.54* -0.96*** *** (0.32) (0.33) (0.29) (0.45) FIX ** *** ** (0.43) (0.33) (0.29) (0.47) (0.50) (0.71) Observations 1,421 1, , R Levy-Yatati and Sturzenegger2003p.1,179 IMF(1)(2)de facto INT 13
Abstract IFS IFS 135
Abstract IFS IFS 135 International Financial Statistics Exchange Arrangements and Exchange Restrictions 136 137 International Financial 138 Exchange Arrangements and Exchange Restrictions International
18lacs.dvi
18 : 114 cfl 2011 1 (Kenichiro Matsui) 1990 2000 ( ) 1 2000 2000 2000 2000 2 (stabilizer) I 3 II 1990 2000 III I. 1. 2000 ODA 2001 9 1 2000 3 1 (2006 ) 8,068-1,468 586 490 6.1% 3,567-4,190 3,397 3,316
IMF http : // htm
1 2 1971 1973 1999 1997 2 IMF 1 1 2 3 1 4 1 2 5 6 1 2 7 IMF http : //www.imf.org/external/np/mfd/er/2006/eng/0706. htm 8 du jure de facto Reinhart Rogoff 20041946 2001 153 Levy-Yeyati Sturzenegger 20051974
ＧＤＰギャップと潜在成長率
2003 output gap 80 1 20 90 20 70 2 1 2 output gap potential output 1 2 (2001) 3 potential rate of growth 2000 Meyer (2000) European Central Bank: (1999b) 2002 10 4 3 (2000) 4 4 () 5 5 5 6 () () 7 Total
高齢化とマクロ投資比率―国際パネルデータを用いた分析―
196 2017 * ** ** ** ** 160 2 2 JEL Classification Codes E21, E22, J11 Keywords * ESRI 28 ESRI 29 3 17 ESRI ** 115 196 Population Aging and Domestic Investment An Analysis Using International Panel Data
国際流動性に関する財政的側面について
IMF SDR IMF 2011 6 1 2 2011 E-mail: obstfeld@econ.berkeley.edu / /2011.10 35 1. 2007 2009 2 Goodhart [1999] 2010 11 2. 4 1970 IMF 1960 36 /2011.10 international reserve 1 D 35 1 D 35 1960 Eichengreen [2011]
1 1 1 [2000]
![1 1 1 [2000]](/thumbs/88/114894310.jpg "1 1 1 [2000]")
* 2000 7 26 1 1 1 [2000] 1 2 1 2 2 1 B to C 250000 億円 200000 日本米国 213,200 150000 100000 50000 0 153,600 106,900 71,100 66,620 42,700 43,860 22,500 26,940 15,340 645 3,360 7,730 1998 年 1999 年 2000 年 2001
デフレの定義（最新版）.PDF
DP/01-1 Director General for Economic Assessment and Policy Analysis CABINET OFFICE E-mail : naoki.okamoto@mfs.cao.go.jp 1 2 3 i (ii) 4 5 Deflation defined as at least two consecutive years of price decreases.
財政赤字の経済分析：中長期的視点からの考察
1998 1999 1998 1999 10 10 1999 30 (1982, 1996) (1997) (1977) (1990) (1996) (1997) (1996) Ihori, Doi, and Kondo (1999) (1982) (1984) (1987) (1993) (1997) (1998) CAPM 1980 (time inconsistency) Persson, Persson
Value Added Tax VAT Mirrlees, J. VAT The Mirrlees Review The Structure and Reform of Direct Taxation Report of a Committee chaired by Professor J. E. Meade Dimensions of Tax Design Mirrlees 2010 Tax by
橡motonishi.PDF
2000 3 ITME Discussion Paper No.26 850-8506 4-2-1 moto@net.nagasaki-u.ac.jp 1 1 MRF 1 (2000) 2 MRF 2 Schreft (1997) 3 2 Tobin (1985) Friedman (1992) 3 3 4 5 3 4 5 2 White (1984) 1 4 (1996) (1999) (1999)
........,.,.,..,.,.,.,.,.,.,.,., International Capital Market Litan et al a b c d M&A a a b E- e- Litan et al. : Table Levine World Bank Levine Greenwald et al. B R F R r R R r B R r B R r B R R Stiglitz
野村資本市場研究所｜アジアの金融競争力（PDF）
2013 Spring 1. GDP 3 26% 2. 3. 4. GDP 1 GDP 2000 25.4% 2012 10 IMF 1 GDP 28.7%GDP 10.7% 20.3% 2000 2012 10 2 3 2000 2012 4.2 5.4 2 2000 14% 2012 26% GDP 2012 30 10 32003 11 2013 Spring 100% 2 90% 80% 70%
6) 7) MBO management buy-out 2 necessity sufficiency ) 21
1) 1997 15 02 03 751 1998 8 9 04 1996 16.1% 17.5% 26.9% 64.9% 63.3% 48.9% 2) 02 54.8% 59.0% 61.8% 78.6% 46.5% 1996 17.8% 19.9% 18.7% 42% 11.9% 3) 4) 01 3 1 3 2 03 04 1 TCL 5) Vol. 52, No. 4, October 06
日本における財政政策のインパクトー1990年代のイベント・スタディー
FTPL FTPL sustainability FTPL fiscal theory of the price level FTPL Fukuda and Teruyama Giavazzi and Pagan Giavazzi and Pagano Alesina and PerottiSutherlandPerottiGiavazzi, Jappelli and Pagano FTPL LeeperSimsWoodford
PowerPoint プレゼンテーション
日本の政府債務と経済成長 小黒曜子 明海大学経済学部 & ICU 社会科学研究所 (SSRI) 研究員 研究の背景 政府債務の増加は成長率に負の影響? (Cf. ex. Reinhart and Rogoff (2010)) エンゲル曲線を用いて日本の 実際の 生活水準を加味すると インフレ率と成長率にバイアスを確認 CPI : 実際の物価水準よりも高く ( 1% 程度 ) 算出される傾向 (eg.
- March SCB -, -, -, -, -, -, -, -, -, -,,,,,, -, -, -, -,, -,,,, -,,,,,, - -,, -,, Survey of Current Business, July, Table (p. ), Oct, Table (p. ) S.
- March SCB -, -, -, -, -, -, -, -, -, -,,,,,, -, -, -, -,, -,,,, -,,,,,, - -,, -,, Survey of Current Business, July, Table (p. ), Oct, Table (p. ) S.C.B. July, Table SCB, -, - - -, -, - -,,,, - Ibid.,
29 Short-time prediction of time series data for binary option trade
29 Short-time prediction of time series data for binary option trade 1180365 2018 2 28 RSI(Relative Strength Index) 3 USD/JPY 1 2001 1 2 4 10 2017 12 29 17 00 1 high low i Abstract Short-time prediction
わが国銀行業の将来像― 預金通貨需要からのアプローチによるマクロ的サイズの検討―
M1GDP M2M1 M1GDP M2M1 E-mail: kazuhiko.ishida@boj.or.jp E-mail: hitoshi.mio@boj.or.jp M2GDP Modigliani-Miller: MM Hoshi and Kashyap HKHK HK Quarterly Financial Report for Manufacturing, Mining and Trade
中国の家計所得と消費構造に関する分析
20 9 2001 12 WTO 80 ...3...6...10...14... 14... 16 20 2003 3 13 625 9,500 3,000 200 825 9,000 2 4 4,000 2002 6 90 1 1 2002 1 1978 0.16 2001 0.32 20 2002 2001 0.51 household localization 2001 12 WTO 2006
Jeffrey Sachs Chang(1998) Steven Radelet and Jeffrey Sachs (1998) 1999 IMF 1999 World Bank 1998 [ 1998 ] 2000 p [ 20
![Jeffrey Sachs Chang(1998) Steven Radelet and Jeffrey Sachs (1998) 1999 IMF 1999 World Bank 1998 [ 1998 ] 2000 p [ 20](/thumbs/88/117909888.jpg "Jeffrey Sachs Chang(1998) Steven Radelet and Jeffrey Sachs (1998) 1999 IMF 1999 World Bank 1998 [ 1998 ] 2000 p [ 20")
62 1997 1996 1 1 2 1 Jeffrey Sachs1997 2 Chang(1998)Steven Radelet and Jeffrey Sachs (1998) 1999 IMF 1999 World Bank1998 [ 1998 ] 2000p.9196 [ 2003] 21 [ 2002 2000] [ 1998 1999 ] 1 62 21 3 4 5 6 90 7 3
OECD Benartzi and Thaler Brown et al. Mottla and Utkus Rooiji et al. Atkinson et al. MacFarland et al. Elton et al. Tang et al. Benartzi and Thaler Br
IFRS. OECD Benartzi and Thaler Brown et al. Mottla and Utkus Rooiji et al. Atkinson et al. MacFarland et al. Elton et al. Tang et al. Benartzi and Thaler Brown et al. /n Benartzi and Thaler n /n Benartzi
SNAと家計調査における貯蓄率の乖離－日本の貯蓄率低下の要因－
RIETI Discussion Paper Series 10-J-003 RIETI Discussion Paper Series 10-J-003 2009 年 12 月 SNA と家計調査における貯蓄率の乖離 - 日本の貯蓄率低下の要因 - 宇南山卓 ( 神戸大学大学院経済学研究科 ) 要 旨 SNA と家計調査から計算される家計貯蓄率の乖離の原因を明らかにし 日本の貯蓄率の低下の原因を考察した
IMES DISCUSSION PAPER SERIES Discussion Paper No. 99-J-17 INSTITUTE FOR MONETARY AND ECONOMIC STUDIES BANK OF JAPAN 100-8630 203 IMES Discussion Paper Series 99-J-17 1999 6 * JEL classification E52 E58
中国引き締め策の対外的影響
ito@nli-research.co.jp 2 2003 2004 9.8 47.8 10.7 84.3 3 1 1 4 5 9.6 9.8 47.8 28.6 84 60.2 30.2 7.5 SARS 15.4 338.83 11.9 726.97 42.7 SARS 10.7 12.8 ( ) 10.9 16.1 1997 6 8.7 11.9 20.7 21.6 16.2 17 7 15.3
デフレ不況下の金融政策をめぐる政治過程
1991 2003 GDP....................................... http://www.stat.go.jp/ http://www.boj.or.jp/ GDP http://www.esri.cao.go.jp/ GDP - - - inflation targeting Krugman a IS-LM liquidity trap Krugman b Krugman
OECD INVEST JAPAN jp/ij/index.htm
Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org) Title OECD 諸国における経営資源の収益率の推計 Sub Title Rates of return on managerial resources : the case of OECD countries Author 遠藤, 正寛 (Endoh, Masahiro) Publisher 慶應義塾大学出版会 Publication
第2章 経済成長と所得分配: マレーシアの事例を中心に
2006 1970 1990 U 1 GDP GDP GDP 1970 1 1969 5 13 5 13 New Economic Policy: NEP NEP 2 NEP 1971 1990 National Development Policy: NDP 1991 2000 Vision Development Policy: VDP 2001 2010 NEP NEP 1990 1980 1
-February FRB BIS IMF BIS Spillover Spillovers BIS IMF EMEs
BIS FRB BIS BIS FRB QE QE -February FRB BIS IMF BIS Spillover Spillovers BIS IMF EMEs GDP GDP........ GDP BIS, 83rd Annual Report, June 2013, p.14 Ibid., p.14. -February 1 1 2009 2013 2) 2009 2013 2) -7.6-4.0
アジアの資本移動の変化に関するクラスター分析 アジア域内の証券投資活性化に向けて
* ** 199 1 1996-97 relation * ** Seoul conference China and Emerging Asia: Reorganizing the Global Economy? held by KIEP and Seoul National University 26 5 11-12 Hugh Patrick Yung-Chul Park 26 9 9-1 East
はじめに
* BBC () ()BBC (FEER) () () (CIP) (UIP) () () 1-1 2-1 3-1 (1870 1990 ) 3-2 (1970 1997 ) 3-3 (1970 1997 ) 3-4 (1870 1990 ) 3-5 4-1 4-2 4-3 4-4 * ( ) 1 IMF (Stiglitz,2000) 1990 ( 30 ) (Bhagwati,1998) 1 IMF
Psacharopulos Psacharopulos and Patrinos (1) Byron and Takahashi McMahon and Boediono Duflo (2)
Psacharopulos Psacharopulos and Patrinos (1) Byron and Takahashi McMahon and Boediono Duflo (2) (3) Survei Sosial Economi NasionalNational Socio-economic Survey SUSENAS KorModul (4) SUSENAS (5) (6) t
(1) (Karlan, 2004) (1) (1973) (1978) (1991) (1991) 1
2004 1 8 2005 12 17 1 (1) (Karlan, 2004) 2 3 4 5 E-mail: aa37065@mail.ecc.u-tokyo.ac.jp (1) (1973) (1978) (1991) (1991) 1 2 2 2.1 (, 1978, 7 ) (2) (1988) 38 2 (3) (4) (2) (1986) 91 (1996) 2 1 (1993) 1
ボーナス制度と家計貯蓄率－サーベイ・データによる再検証－
ESRI Discussion Paper Series No.139 by May 2005 Economic and Social Research Instute Cabinet Office Tokyo, Japan * 400 : JEL classification: D12, E21 * 186-8603 2-1 042-580-8369 FAX 042-580-8333 1 Abstract
Microsoft Word - Šv”|“Å‘I.DOC
90 ª ª * E-mailshinobu.nakagawa@boj.or.jp i ii iii iv SNA 1 70 80 2 80 90 80 80 90 1 80 90 98 6 1 1 SNA 2 1 SNA 80 1SNA 1 19931998 1 2-190 1,2 2 2-2 2-3,4 3 2-5 4 2030 2-3 3 2-15 97 20 90 2-15 9198 1.
ルーカス型総供給方程式の批判的吟味
1 ABSTRACT A detailed analysis on some special characteristics of Lucas's ASL/LAS under generalized conditions: a synthetic understanding of both Lucasian and Keynesian systems by Haruki Niwa First of
物価変動の決定要因について ― 需給ギャップと物価変動の関係の国際比較を中心に―
NAIRU NAIRU NAIRU GDPGDP NAIRUNon- Accelerating Inflation Rate of Unemployment GDP GDP NAIRU Lown and RichFisher, Mahadeva and Whitley raw materials G NAIRUTurnerFai WatanabeNAIRU Watanabe nested NAIRU
Attendance Demand for J-League õ Shinsuke KAWAI* and Takeo HIRATA* Abstract The purpose of this study was to clarify the variables determining the attendance in J-league matches, using the 2,699 J-league
日本の高齢者世帯の貯蓄行動に関する実証分析
196 2017 * ** ** 1 2 3 JEL Classification Codes D14, D15, E21 Keywords * 28 Hyun- Hoon Lee Robert Owen Kwanho Shin ** 29 196 An Empirical Analysis of the Saving Behavior of Elderly Households in Japan
復活だぁっ！ 日本の不況と流動性トラップの逆襲
It s Baaack! Japan s Slump and the Return of the Liquidity Trap 1998 2001 8 29-9 9 Ver.1.0.1 1 2 2 5 2.1..................................... 5 2.2......................... 6 2.3.........................
PDFŠpŒ{Ł¶
Shinkin Central Bank Monthly Review 2003.12 hinkin Central Bank Monthly Review 200312 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 Community Banker 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36
74-2 岩間
128 74 2 21 3 128 134 Journal of the Japanese Association for Petroleum Technology Vol. 74, No. 2 March, 2009 pp. 128 134 Lecture * ** Received February 23, 2009 accepted February 26, 2009 The impact of
産業・企業レベルデータで見た日本の経済成長.pdf
2003 11 10 IT IT JIP JCER ) 2003 CD-ROM http://www.esri.go.jp/jp/archive/bun/bun170/170index. html 1 JIP Jorgenson, Mun, andstiroh (2002) GDP 2 3 1951 1954 1957 1960 1963 1966 1969 1972 1975 1978 1981
日本の世帯属性別貯蓄率の動向について：アップデートと考察
RIETI Discussion Paper Series 18-J-024 RIETI Discussion Paper Series 18-J-024 2018 年 8 日本の世帯属性別貯蓄率の動向について : アップデートと考察 1 宇南 卓 ( 経済産業研究所 ) 野太郎 ( 信州 学 ) 要 旨 全国消費実態調査 家計調査 家計消費状況調査を補完的に利用することでマクロ統計と整合的な貯蓄率のデータを構築した宇南山
目次はじめに 1. 為替相場改革の概要と改革後のチャット相場 今後の為替相場 為替相場の安定性向上に向けた取り組み おわりに はじめに a 211 RIM 214 Vol.14 No.52 41
要 旨 調査部 研究員 熊谷章太郎 212 213 FEC 213 12 213 5, ODA 4 RIM 214 Vol.14 No.52 目次はじめに 1. 為替相場改革の概要と改革後のチャット相場 1 2 3 2. 今後の為替相場 1 2 3. 為替相場の安定性向上に向けた取り組み 1 2 3 おわりに はじめに 211 213a 211 RIM 214 Vol.14 No.52 41 1.
untitled
IV2008#004.nb 1 13. MBS (Mortgage-Backed Securities) à http://www.sjam.co.jp/college/mbs.htm ü IV2008#004.nb 2 MBS MBS GNMA,FHLMC,FNMA MBS CMO( ) 6193 2 IV2008#004.nb 3 ü Bloomberg IV2008#004.nb 4 IV2008#004.nb
Association of South East Asian Nations: ASEAN ASEAN ASEAN ASEAN ASEAN ASEAN ASEAN
Association of South East Asian Nations: ASEAN ASEAN ASEAN ASEAN ASEAN ASEAN ASEAN ASEAN ASEAN ASEAN ASEAN ASEAN ASEAN ASEAN Free Trade Agreement: FTA FTA ASEAN ASEAN ASEAN ASEAN The European Union: EU
untitled
Trade and Trade Finance in the 200809 Financial Crisis, IMF Working Paper WP/11/16., Understanding the Great Trade Collapse of 200809 and the Subsequent Trade Recovery, Economic Perspectives, 2Q/2011.
46−ª3�=4�“ƒ‚S“·‚Ö‡¦
463420101 1. 1989, Yoshida and Rasche1990, Rasche1990, 19921997, Fujiki and Mulligan1996, 1996, Sekine1998, 2001, Fujiki2002, 2003, 2004 Bahmani-Oskooee and Shabsigh1996, Amano and Wirjanto2000, Bahmani-Oskooee
第6章 ベネズエラの石油産業
2004 2004 17.9% 2005 9.4% BCV, Información Estadística ( [sembrar el petróleo]) Karl[1997] Paradox of Plenty Corden[1984] 30 18 PDVSA Petróleos de Venezuela, S.A. 1980 1970 2004 13 1920 90 IT ( API API
和RIM28_向山氏.indd
9ASEAN 23 2615.314.7EU 12.3 27.1 223 2638.1 M&A45.3 2.6 CIS97.5 2 ASEAN 26 RIM 28 Vol.8 No.28 13 1 2 1 2 1 2 1 2 8 9 14 RIM 28 Vol.8 No.28 ASEAN 2 28 GDP 15 2 199798 5 5 15 1997 98 99 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 World
untitled
2 book conference 1990 2003 14 Repeated Cross-Section Data 1 M1,M2 M1 Sekine(1998) Repeated Cross-Section Data 1 1. (1989), Yoshida and Rasche(1990), Rasche(1990), 19921997, Fujiki and Mulligan(1996),
財政のサステナビリティと長期金利の動向
* nakaza-t@hoffman.cc.sophia.ac.jp ** yutaka.soejima@boj.or.jp ()*** **** munehisa.kasuya@boj.or.jp No.03-J-7 2003 10 103-8660 30 * **()******* * ** () *** **** 2003 10 (i) (ii) Keywords: government bonds,
Winter 図 1 図 OECD OECD OECD OECD 2003
266 Vol. 44 No. 3 I 序論 Mirrlees 1971 Diamond 1998 Saez 2002 Kaplow 2008 1 700 900 1, 300 1, 700 II III IV V II わが国の再分配の状況と国際比較 OECD Forster and Mira d Ercole 2005 2006 2001 Winter 08 267 図 1 図 2 2000 2
和RIMNo.22高安氏.indd
NIEsGDP 1990 200436.1 22.365.1 80 GDP 4 RIM 2006 Vol.6 No.22 RIM 2006 Vol.6 No.22 5 NIEs GDP GDP GDP GDP 90 GDP 1951 80 81 90 90 90 2001 2003 GDP 80 90 2001 2002 GDP 87GDP 80 GDP GDP 6 RIM 2006 Vol.6 No.22
Title ベンチャー企業の研究開発支出の決定要因 日本と台湾の事例を中心に Author(s) 蘇, 顯揚 Citation 經濟論叢 (1996), 158(1): Issue Date URL Right
Title ベンチャー企業の研究開発支出の決定要因 日本と台湾の事例を中心に Author(s) 蘇, 顯揚 Citation 經濟論叢 (1996), 158(1): 54-76 Issue Date 1996-07 URL https://doi.org/10.14989/45083 Right Type Departmental Bulletin Paper Textversion publisher
untitled
2009 5 Financial Inclusion Reserve Bank of IndiaRBI Kempson Beck et al. Sarma and Pais 97 RaoRBI Sen ibid. Imperial Bank of India State Bank of India SBI SBI 98 Rao RBI RBI Panagariya ibid. Joshi RBI SBI
03.™ƒ−ÔŁñ“’
BIS BIS, Implications for Central Banks of the Development of Electronic Money, 1996. IC IC IC BC BA IC IC ATM ATM BIS POS IC IC ICICIC ECOM ECOM face-to-face IC Berger, A. N., D. Hancock, and J. C.
遺産相続、学歴及び退職金の決定要因に関する実証分析 『家族関係、就労、退職金及び教育・資産の世代間移転に関する世帯アンケート調査』
2-1. (2-1 ) (2-2 ) (2-3 ) (Hayashi [1986]Dekle [1989]Barthold and Ito [1992] [1996]Campbell [1997] [1998]Shimono and Ishikawa [2002]Shimono and Otsuki [2006] [2008]Horioka [2009]) 1 2-1-1 2-1-1-1 8 (1.
[1987][2000] Awareness
![[1987][2000] Awareness](/thumbs/92/108285816.jpg "[1987][2000] Awareness")
* 1 11 7 1 1999 1 2005 NISC 10 2005 2009 3 1* 1 [1987][2000] 1 2 2006 3 3 Awareness 1 2 3 http://www.ristex.jp/examin/infosociety/gobernance/pdf/fin_hayashikou.pdf 2 4 2 3 4 5 6 2 3 2.1 1 4 1 [1975][1991][2006]
Ver. 1.0 (discretion) (revenue management) (fictitious revenue recognition) (window dressing) (fraudulent accounting practice) SEC (General
2004.11.25 Ver. 1.0 (discretion) (revenue management) (fictitious revenue recognition) (window dressing) (fraudulent accounting practice) SEC (Generally Accepted Accounting Principles: GAAP) GAAP (realization
untitled
[ 研究ノート ] 4% 19 19 20 1997a 20 Mitchell, 2002: 123 208 1997b; 2008 2 1960 1980 Abdel-Fadil, 1975; Hansen, 1969; Radwan & Lee, 1986 Abdel-Fadil, 1980; 85 Assaad, 1997 2 Hopkins Hopkins & Westergaard, 1998:
戦間期日本企業の資金調達、資本コスト、資本構成：最適資本構成理論からみた1930年代における企業財務
1930 Modigliani and Miller [1958] 170 1930 2008 7 16 I E-mail: takashi.nanjou@boj.or.jp E-mail: cc00881@srv.cc.hit-u.ac.jp //2009.7 81 1. 1 2 M&A 3 4 1965 1969 1995 1995 1993 1 2008 2008 1985 2006 10 ROA
1990年代以降の日本の経済変動
1990 * kenichi.sakura@boj.or.jp ** hitoshi.sasaki@boj.or.jp *** masahiro.higo@boj.or.jp No.05-J-10 2005 12 103-8660 30 * ** *** 1990 2005 12 1990 1990 1990 2005 11 2425 BIS E-mail: kenichi.sakura@boj.or.jp
表紙＿目次.PDF
JIL 2 1980 vol.3 15 3 1 3 15 18 IT 26 28 33 20 OECD 80 90 (1998) (2000) 2 Aghion et al. (1999) OECD 1970 1 2 70 1980 90 1.1 Kuznets U inverted U-shaped hypothesis GNP U 1 18901940 6 3 Kuznets(1955) (1963)
Winter 2009 No Lower Earnings Limit
特集 : イギリスの社会保障 - ニューレイバーの 10 年 イギリスの公的 私的年金制度改革 丸谷浩介 I 1 50 1997 II 1. 2 15 Winter 2009 No. 169 8 3 4 1999 1989 8 2. 4 1 2 1 1992 6 16 Lower Earnings Limit1 65 60 1 2 16 2.40 16 2 1 5 1 2 3. 6 1970 State
_16_.indd
well-being well-being well-being Cantril Ladder well-being well-being Cantril Self-Anchoring Striving Scale Cantril Ladder Ladder Ladder awellbeing well-being well-being Gallup World Poll World Database
untitled
* 2001 (B) ** 113-0033 7-3-1 TEL(03)5841-5641FAX(03)5841-5521iwamoto@e.u-tokyo.ac.jp 1990 1990 1 2 3 1 (2002) 2 social infrastructure social capital Woolcook (1998) 3-1 - - 2 - 1990 Mera (1973) G Cobb-Douglas
A5 PDF.pwd
Kwansei Gakuin University Rep Title 日 本 版 不 動 産 投 資 信 託 ( J-REIT) における 利 益 相 反 問 題 Author(s) Kojima, Koji, 児 島, 幸 治 Citation 商 学 論 究, 63(3): 359-375 Issue Date 2016-03-10 URL http://hdl.handle.net/10236/14192
12056286_03.indd
: 82 1 2013 7 2010 2011 1 30 2010 30 2011 30 2010 9 10 11 2011 1 2 1 2010 9 UK UK UK UK UK p. 843 45 82 1 1 UK 9 9 2007-08 UK 30% 30 20%30 150 30 32.5% 2030% p. 843 3 2004-05 5% 5% 75% p. 843 2010 11 1963
税制改正にともなう家計の所得弾性値 : 高齢者パネルデータによる実証分析
Kwansei Gakuin University Rep Title Author(s) 税制改正にともなう家計の所得弾性値 : 高齢者パネルデータによる実証分析 Uemura, Toshiyuki, 上村, 敏之 ; Kitamura Takayuki, 金田, 陸幸 Citation 経済学論究, 69(4): 1-16 Issue Date 2016-3-20 URL http://hdl.handle.net/10236/14671
Salesforce DX.key
Salesforce DX とは? Salesforceの開発生産性向上のための新機能 Mitsuhiro Okamoto Senior Developer Evangelist Trail blazer @mitsuhiro mokamoto@salesforce.com Forward-Looking Statements Statement under the Private Securities
untitled
1. R.A. 2. R. 3. R. HBJ 4. R.HBJ 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. Open Macro Model IS curve and LM curve BP curve Point 1 Point 2 ex. Remark Point 1 Point 2 of = Def. trade balance EX IM Remark 4 Def.
橡
120 (304) ~, 148 ~ ~, 9: ~ f:i ti pr, Barro, R. and D. Gordon, :1983. Rules, Dis::re~tion and Reputation in a Model of Monetary Policy, J. 114'. E. 12. " B arro, R. J., 1972. Inflationary Finance ana rh
公務員人件費のシミュレーション分析
ESRI Discussion Paper Series No.256 December 2010 Economic and Social Research Institute Cabinet Office Tokyo, Japan The views expressed in ESRI Discussion Papers are those of the authors and not those
Microsoft Word - 2016年06月月次データ_総合
経 済 動 向 分 析 ) 在 日 本 国 大 使 館 経 済 動 向 1) In the Q1 2016, a faster growth of wage costs was recorded, which entailed decrease of profitability of enterprises to 49.3%. Household real consumption per capita
Public Investment, the Rate of Return, and Optimal Fiscal Policy Economic Growth Pioneering Economic Theory Mathematical Theories of Economic Growth Review of Economic Studiesvol.27 Econometrica vol.34
- March
Grzegorz W. Ko odko TIGER - March - March - March - March - March - March - March - March - March Economist - March - March Economist - March PlanEcon - March - March - March - March - March
2 2 3 4 5 5 6 10 14 17 18 18 20
1. 1990 2001 38 02 2. 90 3. 00 3 4. 02 5.5 3.6 2 5. 02 03 GDP 0 2 2 3 4 5 5 6 10 14 17 18 18 20 1930 50 81090 10 2001 38 2.2 2.301 7 02 3.603 5 3.5 FRB03 2 11 BS BS BS 90 1 Personal Income and Its Disposition
通し組／Ｆ７：論説：西垣鳴人（送り）
p EFT electronic funds transfer EFT IT IC integrated circuit IC IC IC IC IC IC IC debit system IC IC P NET IC IC EFT IC IC IC ATM IC IC http : //www.debitcard.gr.jp/about/index.html p p IC IC closed loop
ŒÚ”ŁŠp.qx
10 Sawada Yasuyuki 199798 twin crisis Kaminsky and Reinhart199919701980 1 19981 122 2001 20061998 1 197079 1 198095 1 26 2.6 50 3.13 1 0.10 18 1.13 25 2.50 32 2.00 3 0.30 23 1.44 Kaminsky and Reinhart1999,
Kobe University Repository : Kernel Title 世 界 金 融 危 機 の 東 アジア 新 興 国 経 済 への 影 響 Author(s) 金 京, 拓 司 Citation 国 民 経 済 雑 誌, 202(5): 61-70 Issue date 2010-11 Resource Type Departmental Bulletin Paper / 紀 要
p *2 DSGEDynamic Stochastic General Equilibrium New Keynesian *2 2
2013 1 nabe@ier.hit-u.ac.jp 2013 4 11 Jorgenson Tobin q : Hayashi s Theorem : Jordan : 1 investment 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 *1 *1 93SNA 1 p.180 1936 100 1970 *2 DSGEDynamic Stochastic General Equilibrium New Keynesian
村本 孜５１‐８５／５１‐８５
One for all, all for one. One for all, all for one. ( One for all, all for one. ) One for all, all for one. ( One for all, all for one. ) One for all, all for one. Manes, A. (1877~1963) [2006] p. 37 Raiffisen
M&A の経済分析：M&A はなぜ増加したのか
RIETI Discussion Paper Series 06-J-034 RIETI Discussion Paper Series 06-J-034 M&A の経済分析 :M&A はなぜ増加したのか 蟻川靖浩 宮島英昭 ( 早稲田大学 RIETI) 2006 年 4 月 要旨 1990 年代以降の M&A の急増の主要な要因は 産業や企業の成長性や収益性へのショックである とりわけ M&A を活発に行っている産業あるいは企業の特性としては
ミレニアム開発目標の現状と課題
hunger G ODA GDP GDP GDP Basic Human Needs GDP...... United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization The World Conference on Education for All a b c d OECD Development Assistance Committee
headquarter Gertner et al. winner-picking Wal-Mart s
CJEB The financial strategies of Japanese multinational enterprises and internal capital market, Columbia Business School, CJEB, Working Paper No., April,. headquarter Gertner et al. winner-picking Wal-Mart
60 Vol. 44 No. 1 2 準市場 化の制度的枠組み: 英国 教育改革法 1988 の例 Education Reform Act a School Performance Tables LEA 4 LEA LEA 3
Summer 08 59 I はじめに quasi market II III IV V 1 II 教育サービスにおける 準市場 1 教育サービスにおける 準市場 の意義 Education Reform Act 1988 1980 Local Education Authorities LEA Le Grand 1991 Glennerster 1991 3 1 2 3 2 60 Vol. 44
南原
The Foreign Trade and Navigation of the Port of Bangkok, The Foreign Trade and Navigation of the Kingdom of Siam, Annual Statement of the Foreign Trade and Navigation of the Kingdom of Siam The Foreign
WEO guidline Japanese OAP
World Economic Outlook(WEO, 世 界 経 済 見 通 し) データベースの 検 索 方 法 WEOデータベースでは 各 国 の 各 種 経 済 指 標 を 国 地 域 カテゴリ 別 に 検 索 することができ また 検 索 したデータをExcelファイルとしてダウンロードすることができます WEOは 春 と 秋 ( 通 常 4 月 と9 月 /10 月 )に 発 行 され
円借款案件・事後評価報告書1999（全文・上巻）
8 1999 3 199812 () 19919 19919 19981 7,854 5,335 3.0% 257 239 (1) (B) (2) 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 JP US$ 134.71 126.65 111.20 102.21 94.06 BUS$ 025.47 025.39 025.35 025.00 025.14 CPI 105.7 110.0 113.7
国際文化20号.indd
1 2 3 unauthorized immigrants 1 The Americano Dream 2 3 a b c d 1 2 2006 5 1 100 40 1 2005 12 2006 3 1990 19 20 21 2001 9 9 11 2004 1 F 2 U.S.Census Bureau 2000 199010 1130 3110 199057 20043424 19 20 1900-1910
;;; ;;; ;; ;; ;; ;; ;; ;; ;; ;; ;;;; ;;;; ;;;; ;;;;; ;;;; ;;;; ;;;; The World Bank Annual Report World Development
untitled
2007 2 * (i) (ii) 2006 7 1999 2 2000 8 1 (2003) Oda and Ueda (2005) 2005 Kimura and Small(2006) Iwamura, Shiratsuka and Watanabe (2006) (2006) 3 (i) (ii) (iii) 2 2 3 4 2.1 (2003) (2005) 1) (i) (ii) (i)
e? e? h? h? h? h? h? h? e??ee??ee??ee??ee??ee??ee??ee??ee??ee??ee??ee??ee??ee??ee??ee??ee??ee??ee??ee??ee??ee??ee??ee??ee??ee??ee??ee??ee??ee??ee??ee??ee??ee??ee??ee??ee??ee?? e??ee??ee??ee??ee??ee??ee??ee??ee??ee??ee??ee??ee??ee??ee??ee??ee??ee??ee??ee??ee??ee??ee??ee??ee??ee??ee??ee??ee??ee??ee??ee??ee??ee??ee??ee??ee??ee??
<95DB8C9288E397C389C88A E696E6462>
2011 Vol.60 No.2 p.138 147 Performance of the Japanese long-term care benefit: An International comparison based on OECD health data Mie MORIKAWA[1] Takako TSUTSUI[2] [1]National Institute of Public Health,
Coulibaly & Fontagné Finger & Kreinin 1979 Lee Coulibaly & Fontagné 2004 Coulibaly & Fontagné distance 4 i
1 2 3 Iwata, Kato, Shibasaki 2010 GDP Kurmanalieva 2008 Kurmanalieva 2008 169 41 2011 1980 1990 2 Coulibaly & Fontagné 2004 3 Finger & Kreinin 1979 Lee 1997 4 Coulibaly & Fontagné 2004 Coulibaly & Fontagné
[1964] [1957] Core Peripheral 7 Mangan,John[2000] [1999] [1999]pp7-8 5 [1964]p89 6 Doeringer and
![[1964] [1957] Core Peripheral 7 Mangan,John[2000] [1999] [1999]pp7-8 5 [1964]p89 6 Doeringer and](/thumbs/88/115073126.jpg "[1964] [1957] Core Peripheral 7 Mangan,John[2000] [1999] [1999]pp7-8 5 [1964]p89 6 Doeringer and")
1 2 2 1 Cappelli,Peter[1999] 20 3 1 [1999] 20 1928 1935 1 1965 2003 2 [1998] 3 Cappelli, Peter [1999]p4-1 - 1945 1973 1960 4 [1964] 2 5 1948 [1957] 1960 6 Core Peripheral 7 Mangan,John[2000] 1970 1980