Masanori Hashimoto Rene Fahr and Hilmar Schneider 1. Hashimoto, Masanori Fahr, Rene and Hilmar Schneider Hashimoto, Masanori 2004 Fahr

28 Vol. 43 No. 1 2 Burchardt, Le Grand & Piachaud 1999 Bradshaw et al Gordon et al.2000 Whelan et al.2002 poverty de

27 2002 1998 1999 EC2000 National Action Plans for Social Inclusion 1 1 2 3 4 16 18 1 2 2 1 28 Vol. 43 No. 1 2 Burchardt, Le Grand & Piachaud 1999 Bradshaw et al. 2000 Gordon et al.2000 Whelan et al.2002

最適電源構成モデルを用いた卸電力取引市場の経済厚生の評価分析

RIETI Discussion Paper Series 07-J-044 \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \

再生可能電力の送配電・蓄電費用措置制度に関する経済的考察

,.,,.,. NIRA,.,.,,, GDP.,., 1%, 2.0% 3).,,.,,., 1, 4).,,.,, GDP,.,,.,,,.,,., 2002.,,., 3), Q&A Q16 (http://www.stat.go.jp/data/kakei/qa-1.ht

1, 1, 2011 4 3-28,,.,,.,.,,.,,.,,.,.,. 1., 1), 1946.,, GDP,.,,,.,,., (2008) ( NIRA ), 23,.,,, 2).,,,.,,.,,., 657-8501 2-1, E-mail: unayama@person.kobe-u.ac.jp 1) 1. 2), 1990 2 21, 1993 6 12. 3 1 1 2011

税制改正にともなう家計の所得弾性値 : 高齢者パネルデータによる実証分析

Kwansei Gakuin University Rep Title Author(s) 税制改正にともなう家計の所得弾性値 : 高齢者パネルデータによる実証分析 Uemura, Toshiyuki, 上村, 敏之 ; Kitamura Takayuki, 金田, 陸幸 Citation 経済学論究, 69(4): 1-16 Issue Date 2016-3-20 URL http://hdl.handle.net/10236/14671

ミクロ・データによる家計行動分析： 将来不安と予備的貯蓄

subjective measures E-mailkeiko.murata@mfs.cao.go.jp subjective subjective measures Dardanoni Leland waiting option Browning and LusardiEngen and Gruber Carroll and Samwick PSIDPanel Study of Income Dynamics

1 st 2 nd Dec

2 12 1 2 2 1 st 2 nd Dec.2007 2 1 st 2 nd Dec.2007 1 3 1 st 2 nd Dec.2007 1 2 1 2 1. 2. (2004) 3. 3 4 3 1 2 1. 2. 3 1. 2. 3. 4 4 1 2 5 1 2 6 4 1 st 2 nd Dec.2007 5 1 st 2 nd Dec.2007 1 10 (2004) 4 120

JSPS Grants-in-Aid for Creative Scientific Research Understanding Inflation Dynamics of the Japanese Economy Working Paper Series No.7 日本家計の消費 貯蓄 労働プロ

Title 日本家計の消費 貯蓄 労働プロファイル Author(s) 阿部, 修人 ; 稲倉, 典子 Citation Issue 2007-02-14 Date Type Technical Report Text Version publisher URL http://hdl.handle.net/10086/13627 Right Hitotsubashi University Repository

Winter 図 1 図 OECD OECD OECD OECD 2003

266 Vol. 44 No. 3 I 序論 Mirrlees 1971 Diamond 1998 Saez 2002 Kaplow 2008 1 700 900 1, 300 1, 700 II III IV V II わが国の再分配の状況と国際比較 OECD Forster and Mira d Ercole 2005 2006 2001 Winter 08 267 図 1 図 2 2000 2

,,,

法定割増賃金率の引き上げが時間外労働時間 * および有給休暇の付与 取得に与える影響 深堀遼太郎萩原里紗 Keio Household Panel Survey: KHPS Difference in Differences DD ,,, Hamermesh, Trejo, Keio Household Panel Survey: KHPS KHPS URL http://www.mhlw.go.jp/topics/

表紙＿目次.PDF

JIL 2 1980 vol.3 15 3 1 3 15 18 IT 26 28 33 20 OECD 80 90 (1998) (2000) 2 Aghion et al. (1999) OECD 1970 1 2 70 1980 90 1.1 Kuznets U inverted U-shaped hypothesis GNP U 1 18901940 6 3 Kuznets(1955) (1963)

SNAと家計調査における貯蓄率の乖離－日本の貯蓄率低下の要因－

RIETI Discussion Paper Series 10-J-003 RIETI Discussion Paper Series 10-J-003 2009 年 12 月 SNA と家計調査における貯蓄率の乖離 - 日本の貯蓄率低下の要因 - 宇南山卓 ( 神戸大学大学院経済学研究科 ) 要 旨 SNA と家計調査から計算される家計貯蓄率の乖離の原因を明らかにし 日本の貯蓄率の低下の原因を考察した

Ishi

Ishi HPhttp: // www.mof.go.jp / jouhou / syuzei / siryou /.htm.. or ERTA, TRA ERTA Economic Recovery Tax Act TRA Tax Reform Act Mroz Triest Lindsey Burtless Navrati Lindsey Burtless Navrati CPS Current

産業・企業レベルデータで見た日本の経済成長.pdf

2003 11 10 IT IT JIP JCER ) 2003 CD-ROM http://www.esri.go.jp/jp/archive/bun/bun170/170index. html 1 JIP Jorgenson, Mun, andstiroh (2002) GDP 2 3 1951 1954 1957 1960 1963 1966 1969 1972 1975 1978 1981

Stepwise Chow Test * Chow Test Chow Test Stepwise Chow Test Stepwise Chow Test Stepwise Chow Test Riddell Riddell first step second step sub-step Step

Stepwise Chow Test * Chow Test Chow Test Stepwise Chow Test Stepwise Chow Test Stepwise Chow Test Riddell Riddell first step second step sub-step Stepwise Chow Test a Stepwise Chow Test Takeuchi 1991Nomura

Hi-Stat Discussion Paper Series No.248 東京圏における 1990 年代以降の住み替え行動 住宅需要実態調査 を用いた Mixed Logit 分析 小林庸平行武憲史 March 2008 Hitotsubashi University Research Unit

Hi-Stat Discussion Paper Series No.248 東京圏における 1990 年代以降の住み替え行動 住宅需要実態調査 を用いた Logit 分析 小林庸平行武憲史 March 2008 Hitotsubashi University Research Unit for Statistical Analysis in Social Sciences A 21st-Century

1 st 2 nd Dec.2007 Keio Economic Observatory Occasional Paper J.No.28 1993 pp4-54 2

1 st 2 nd Dec.2007 Keio Economic Observatory Occasional Paper J.No.28 1993 pp4-54 2 1 st 2 nd Dec.2007 3 1 st 2 nd Dec.2007 4 1 st 2 nd Dec.2007 10 5 1 st 2 nd Dec.2007 1 1 2005 1-1 18 P. 6 1 st 2 nd Dec.2007

ワールド・ワイド　１０‐２（Ｐ）／３．中尾

28 1 35 35 1 2003 35 2 3 4 29 1965 1998 35 1000 5 647 1960 6 35 7 8 2 30 10 2 2. 1 2. 2 2. 3 3 3. 1 3. 2 4 2 2 2. 1 9 1 2003 1 647 10 t π macro 1 1964 1998 31 t- π macro 7.21 0.12 t 31.3610.65 R 2 0.77

OSIPP41_p1_2.eps

2007 年 冬 号 No.41 1 2 3 4 Peace Culture Review of Economic Design Journal of Labor Economics Hitotsubashi Journal of Economics Japan and the World Economy Daily Yomiuri Working Paper Series, Center for

日本の世帯属性別貯蓄率の動向について：アップデートと考察

RIETI Discussion Paper Series 18-J-024 RIETI Discussion Paper Series 18-J-024 2018 年 8 日本の世帯属性別貯蓄率の動向について : アップデートと考察 1 宇南 卓 ( 経済産業研究所 ) 野太郎 ( 信州 学 ) 要 旨 全国消費実態調査 家計調査 家計消費状況調査を補完的に利用することでマクロ統計と整合的な貯蓄率のデータを構築した宇南山

Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization Quarterly Journal of Economics Review of Economics and Statistics Internal Labor Markets and Manpower Analysis Economics of Education Review Journal of Political

[1964] [1957] Core Peripheral 7 Mangan,John[2000] [1999] [1999]pp7-8 5 [1964]p89 6 Doeringer and

1 2 2 1 Cappelli,Peter[1999] 20 3 1 [1999] 20 1928 1935 1 1965 2003 2 [1998] 3 Cappelli, Peter [1999]p4-1 - 1945 1973 1960 4 [1964] 2 5 1948 [1957] 1960 6 Core Peripheral 7 Mangan,John[2000] 1970 1980

Autumn 06 1 2005 100 100 1 100 1 2003 2005 10 2003 2005 2

2005 25-2 17 395.6 149.1 1 2004 2 2003p.13 3 Autumn 06 1 2005 100 100 1 100 1 2003 2005 10 2003 2005 2 Vol. 42 No. 2 2 100 20052005 2002 20052005 3 2005 10 1 II III IV 1 1 1 2 1 4 15-2 30 4,091 54.5 2

....671-......3.Z...QXD (Page 1)

http://www.mhlw.go.jp/topics///tp- /.html , ..,,, .......... p. p. p. p. p. p. p. p. p http://bktp.org/news/. pp.- pp. -. pp. -. pp.-. COE pp.-. pp.-. pp.-. pp. -. pp.-. pp.-. ESRI Discussion

OECD INVEST JAPAN jp/ij/index.htm

Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org) Title OECD 諸国における経営資源の収益率の推計 Sub Title Rates of return on managerial resources : the case of OECD countries Author 遠藤, 正寛 (Endoh, Masahiro) Publisher 慶應義塾大学出版会 Publication

448 Vol. 44 No 図

Spring 09 447 概要 2004 1 2 I はじめに 19 2007 1. 34 2006 1. 32 90 1 90 Galor and Weil 1996 1996 1999 90 Sleebos 2003 Apps and Rees 2004 Martínez and Iza 2004 448 Vol. 44 No. 4 2. 20 2. 00 1. 80 1. 60 1. 40

untitled

2 21 1984 50 3500 4200 1 3 1 1985 1984 1 2 1984 50 3 2 3 4 1 1989 35 3 4 5 22 3 1 19811984 19841987 1989 1981 1985 13 1984 1984 1986 1985 20 10 1987 10 2 36 1989 65 1989 1953 1985 60 1933 6.71% 43 3.15%53

公務員倫理問題への新アプローチ

OECD CPI CPI CPI CPI CPI CPI / GDP / / / /.............................. Transparency International Corruption Perception Index CPI CPI 30 25 20 15 10 5 0 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007

,,.,,.,..,.,,,.,, Aldous,.,,.,,.,,, NPO,,.,,,,,,.,,,,.,,,,..,,,,.,

J. of Population Problems. pp.,.,,,.,,..,,..,,,,.,.,,...,.,,..,.,,,. ,,.,,.,..,.,,,.,, Aldous,.,,.,,.,,, NPO,,.,,,,,,.,,,,.,,,,..,,,,., ,,.,,..,,.,.,.,,,,,.,.,.,,,. European Labour Force Survey,,.,,,,,,,

432001 4.1 1990 1990 (Information Technology ) 1990 1992 19981998 28

432001 2739 Hisako ISHII 1990 (US Bureau of Labor Statistics, BLS)Monthly Labor Review MLR 25 19831993 20004.6 27 432001 4.1 1990 1990 (Information Technology ) 1990 1992 19981998 28 1990 8 7 6 5 4 3 2

201609発達・教育臨床論コース

葛 葛 遡 ONISHI Kimie 1971 7 14 2013 4 1900-30 2013 4 2013 4 2013 4 1950 2009 6 4 1 257-288 2012 3 4 145-187 2013 3 1 16-39 5 84-107 7 368-383 18 2008 8 80-85 100 18330178 2009 3 223-248 1930 20530686

2 3 4 II. 8 10 12 14 20 8 6,000 3,695 61.6 10 6,000 3754 62.6 12 5,010 3,111 62.1 149,000558362.0 62% 4 2059 ++5 4 78.3 (2%) 2002 3 8 10,12 14 8

453200810 I. Dicks-Mireaux and King (1983)Hubbard (1985) Dicks-Mireaux and King (1983)Hubbard (1985)(1990)(2000) Attanasio and Brugiavini(2003), Attanasio and Rohwedder(2003) (unobservable) heterogeneity

Association of South East Asian Nations: ASEAN ASEAN ASEAN ASEAN ASEAN ASEAN ASEAN

Association of South East Asian Nations: ASEAN ASEAN ASEAN ASEAN ASEAN ASEAN ASEAN ASEAN ASEAN ASEAN ASEAN ASEAN ASEAN ASEAN Free Trade Agreement: FTA FTA ASEAN ASEAN ASEAN ASEAN The European Union: EU

untitled

[ 研究ノート ] 4% 19 19 20 1997a 20 Mitchell, 2002: 123 208 1997b; 2008 2 1960 1980 Abdel-Fadil, 1975; Hansen, 1969; Radwan & Lee, 1986 Abdel-Fadil, 1980; 85 Assaad, 1997 2 Hopkins Hopkins & Westergaard, 1998:

160_cov.indd

TFR198 1.5 2. TFR 3 TFR2 2 2.11 total fertility rate, TFR 2.5 3 TFR OECD3 25TFR 2 5 1 TFR 1.5212 2 262. 1.5 13 3 18 193 19 2 195 196 TFR van de Kaa 1987 Lesthaeghe and Moors 2 1997TFR198 4 2.1 TFRTFR 1.5

2) 3) 2) Ohkusa, 1996 ; 1999 ; Ohtake and Ohkusa, 1994 ; La Croix and A. Kawamura, Reject American Economic Review, Journal of Political Econom

1) IOC Major League Baseball s MLB Blue Ribbon Panel Levin et al. 1) Yamamura and Shin, 2005 a ; 2005 b ; 2005 c communication 2) 3) 2) Ohkusa, 1996 ; 1999 ; Ohtake and Ohkusa, 1994 ; La Croix and A. Kawamura,

¢‡Í‡Î‡½‡«£85“ƒ

橡同居選択における所得の影響（DP原稿）.PDF

** *** * 2000 13 ** *** (1) (2) (1986) - 1 - - 2 - (1986) Ohtake (1991) (1993) (1994) (1996) (1997) (1997) Hayashi (1997) (1999) 60 Ohtake (1991) 86 (1996) 89 (1997) 92 (1999) 95 (1993) 86 89 74 79 (1986)

KHPS JHPS KHPS JHPS KHPS JHPS KHPS JHPS KHPS JHPS KHPS JHPS KHPSKeio Household Panel Survey JHPSJapan Household Panel Survey KHPS,JHPS,KHPS,, KHPS JHP

慶應義塾家計パネル調査(KHPS) と 日本家計パネル調査 (JHPS) における Cross-sectional / Longitudinal * ウェイトおよびパネル統合ウェイトの作成 石井加代子野崎華世 Keio Household Panel Survey: KHPSJapan Household Panel Survey: JHPS KHPS JHPS Cross-sectional Longitudinal

ＧＤＰギャップと潜在成長率

2003 output gap 80 1 20 90 20 70 2 1 2 output gap potential output 1 2 (2001) 3 potential rate of growth 2000 Meyer (2000) European Central Bank: (1999b) 2002 10 4 3 (2000) 4 4 () 5 5 5 6 () () 7 Total

ワーク・ライフ・バランス社会の実現と生産性の関係に関する研究（平成21年度）報告書

3 / 57 3 1 20-24 III- 18 A 1 6 65-70 65-69 6 58 III- 18 A 1 65-70 65-69 59 9 8 41 9 59 9 30 9 17 III- 60 III- III- 61 9 1 III- 62 III- 63 30 III- 64 III- 65 III- Separated 66 III- Separated 67 49 III-

untitled

2006 Progress Report on the Economic Well-Being of Working-Age People with Disabilities Employment of Disabled People in Europe in 2002 Statistics in Focus Code of Practice on Managing Disability in the

-February GDP GDP

-February GDP GDP - GDP. GDP GDP / GDP DI.. DI..,,. -February (2010=100) 115 110 105 100 95 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 800 350 750 700 300 650 600 250 550

320_…X…e†Q“õ‹øfiÁ’F

Attendance Demand for J-League õ Shinsuke KAWAI* and Takeo HIRATA* Abstract The purpose of this study was to clarify the variables determining the attendance in J-league matches, using the 2,699 J-league

中京大学経済学論叢 23 号 2012 年 3 月 審査論文 1 Keywords: JEL Classi cation: L13, L22, L33 1 * *1 Inoue, Kamijo, and Tomaru (2009) Mukherjee and Suestrong

中京大学経済学論叢 23 号 22 年 3 月 審査論文 Keywords: JEL Classication: L3, L22, L33 * 2373253 * Inoue, Kamijo, and Tomaru (29)Mukherjee and Suestrong (29) Long and Stähler (29)Gil-Molto, Poyago-Theotoky, and Zikos (2)Matsumura

* 積極的労働市場政策と若年雇用 山本勲野原快太 DD DD

* 積極的労働市場政策と若年雇用 山本勲野原快太 DD DD . Active Labor Market Policy ALMP Passive Labor Market Policy, PLMP OECD OECD Boeri and Bruda Kluve Card et al. job search assistance program Burtless Calmfors Blundell et

0911_hyo1.eps

自殺の経済社会的要因に関する調査研究報告書

17 1 2 3 4 5 11 16 30,247 17 18 21,024 +2.0 6 12 13 WHO 100 14 7 15 2 5 8 16 9 10 17 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 II I 18 Durkheim(1897) Hamermesh&Soss(1974)Dixit&Pindyck(1994) Becker&Posner(2004) Rosenthal(1993)

untitled

Employment Outlook Employment Outlook Employment Outlook Overtime in Europe Working Time Developments - 2006 Working Time Around the World Working Time and Workers Preferences in Industrialized

An Empirical Study of the Securities Firms' Dilemma on Financial Innovation through Diffusion of Internet Deals Yasugi Satoshi Bower, J. L., 1999, Disruptive technologies: Catching the wave,

Becker 1965 Gronau a a a

1 1 1 1 1 3.3 6 0.43 0.45 2 2002 Becker1965 Gronau1977 1 a 3.3 3.6 6.0 4.9 4.8 3.6 a 7.4 8.4 8.1 7.6 7.5 6.5 0.45 0.43 0.74 0.64 0.64 0.55 1995 a Vol. 42 No. 2 II III IV V VI VII 1 1998Nishioka 199820022002

小売業におけるPB戦略とストアロイヤルティ

Abstract Recent years, the quality of the private label products is considerably improved, and the penetration in the product category is increasing and it continues evolving to the store brand that it

Autumn EU 22 CD P RR 9 7 EU EU 2003 OECD 8 EU OECD OECD EC Included in Society 2003 EC OECD EU

138 Vol. 44 No. 2 はじめに 20 2008 5 2007 9 EU I 障害者政策の国際比較研究 1981 80 90 1990 ADA 1 1999 OAS 2 1996 CD P RR 3 EC 2003 2004 2010 1993 10 ESCAP 4 10 2003 BMF 5 BMF 2007 9 2001 2006 12 2008 5 2000 EU EC EU Autumn

C. R. McKenzie 2003 3 2004 ( 38 ) 2 2004 2005 (Keio Household Panel Survey) control group treatment group 1

KEIO UNIVERSITY MARKET QUALITY RESEARCH PROJECT (A 21 st Century Center of Excellence Project) DP2005-020 * C. R. McKenzie** 2003 3 2004 ( 38 ) 2 2004 2005 (Keio Household Panel Survey) control group treatment

戦間期日本企業の資金調達、資本コスト、資本構成：最適資本構成理論からみた1930年代における企業財務

1930 Modigliani and Miller [1958] 170 1930 2008 7 16 I E-mail: takashi.nanjou@boj.or.jp E-mail: cc00881@srv.cc.hit-u.ac.jp //2009.7 81 1. 1 2 M&A 3 4 1965 1969 1995 1995 1993 1 2008 2008 1985 2006 10 ROA

物価指数の計測誤差と品質調整手法：わが国CPIからの教訓

CPICPI CPI CPI CPI CPI Economic Perspective Shiratsukaa Consumer Price IndexCPI CPI CPI CPI CPI Advisory Commission to Study the Consumer Price Index 1996Shiratsuka 1999bHoffmann 1998Cunningham 1996 Crawford

376-08ooi.indd

統計指標からみたハウジングアフォーダビリティの国際的動向 Ⅰ はじめに United States Census BureauForeclosure Rates... Housing Affordability Affordable Housing United States Census Bureau c, p.. Ⅱ ハウジングアフォーダビリティ統計に関する先行研究 Ernst Engel Engel

1: 合計特殊出生率 出生率の推移 暦年 アメリカドイツフランス スウェーデン日本 Apps and Re

1 1 Galor and Weil (1996) (Sleebos, 2003) 2-1, E-mail: koba@econ.kobe-u.ac.jp 1 1: 合計特殊出生率 2.20 2.00 1.80 1.60 1.40 1.20 1.00 出生率の推移 1985 1987 1989 1991 1993 1995 暦年 アメリカドイツフランス スウェーデン日本 1997 1999 2001

292 Vol. 44 No refundable tax credit Mirrlees 1971 Friedman

Winter 08 291 I はじめに Shinozaki 2005 2006 OECD United Nations 2007 OECD 2008 2 1 2006 2005 2 2006 refundable tax credit 2006 292 Vol. 44 No. 3 3 1 2 refundable tax credit 3 10 5 5 10 5 2 1 Mirrlees 1971

JAPAN MARKETING JOURNAL 111 Vol.28 No.32008

Vol.28 No.32008 JAPAN MARKETING JOURNAL 111 Vol.28 No.32008 JAPAN MARKETING JOURNAL 111 Vol.28 No.32008 JAPAN MARKETING JOURNAL 111 Vol.28 No.32008 JAPAN MARKETING JOURNAL 111 Vol.28 No.32008 JAPAN MARKETING

JAPAN MARKETING JOURNAL 113 Vol.29 No.12009

JAPAN MARKETING JOURNAL 113 Vol.29 No.12009 JAPAN MARKETING JOURNAL 113 Vol.29 No.12009 JAPAN MARKETING JOURNAL 113 Vol.29 No.12009 JAPAN MARKETING JOURNAL 113 Vol.29 No.12009 Vol.29 No.12009 JAPAN MARKETING

JAPAN MARKETING JOURNAL 110 Vol.28 No.22008

Vol.28 No.22008 JAPAN MARKETING JOURNAL 110 Vol.28 No.22008 JAPAN MARKETING JOURNAL 110 Vol.28 No.22008 JAPAN MARKETING JOURNAL 110 Vol.28 No.22008 JAPAN MARKETING JOURNAL 110 Vol.28 No.22008 JAPAN MARKETING

【表紙】経済学論叢＿１８号／表１・３・背

Blanchard Solow Solow Galor and Tsiddon ,, , ,, ,,,,,, a if b c if if CES CES,,,,,,. Bowles Ciccone and Peri, .,, Bowles Hamermesh Antras Ciccone and Peri CES CES Krusell et al. Duffy et al. Hornstein

アジアの資本移動の変化に関するクラスター分析　アジア域内の証券投資活性化に向けて

* ** 199 1 1996-97 relation * ** Seoul conference China and Emerging Asia: Reorganizing the Global Economy? held by KIEP and Seoul National University 26 5 11-12 Hugh Patrick Yung-Chul Park 26 9 9-1 East

Vol. 42 No pp Headcount ratio p p A B pp.29

1990 2003 2005 2000 1998 2004 2001 2 2000 2001 2000 1 Vol. 42 No. 2 2005 pp.21-22 25 25-29 30-34 1999 1 Headcount ratio 2 1995 20-25 25-30 2005 p.25 2005 2000 2 15 34 2003 p.3 15 34 A B 3 4 3 3 2003 pp.29-332001

IMES DISCUSSION PAPER SERIES Discussion Paper No. 99-J- 9 -J-19 INSTITUTE FOR MONETARY AND ECONOMIC STUDIES BANK OF JAPAN

IMES DISCUSSION PAPER SERIES Discussion Paper No. 99-J- 9 -J-19 INSTITUTE FOR MONETARY AND ECONOMIC STUDIES BANK OF JAPAN 100-8630 03 IMES Discussion Paper Series 99-J- 9 -J-19 1999 6 * * [1999] *(E-mail:

1 1 1 [2000]

* 2000 7 26 1 1 1 [2000] 1 2 1 2 2 1 B to C 250000 億円 200000 日本米国 213,200 150000 100000 50000 0 153,600 106,900 71,100 66,620 42,700 43,860 22,500 26,940 15,340 645 3,360 7,730 1998 年 1999 年 2000 年 2001

Financial Reporting Standard 17 FRS17 FAS87 87 Financial Accounting Standard 87 FAS87 International Accounting Standard Board IASB 19 Internat

No,25-36(2005) Two Changes in Accounting Principles of Pension Plans British, or Americanthat is the question Masaharu Usuki Nihon University, Graduate School of Social and Cultural School, and NLI Research

59-72OGUMA.indd

EULCC EU LCC 59 1. EU 1 EU 60 70 6 10.6 2 EU LCC 61 1 62 70 6 10.6 2 EU LCC 2. EU LCC 1 EU LCC EU LCC 63 1 EU LCC 2005 64 70 6 10.6 2 LCC EU LCC 65 2 LCC 66 70 6 10.6 3 LCC 2009 EU LCC 67 3. 68 70 6 10.6

1 2 2005 1983 1 ()1984 2 1947 1950 19791996 1

KEO Discussion Paper No.104 19451947 * ** 2006 11 19451947 * ** 1 2 2005 1983 1 ()1984 2 1947 1950 19791996 1 4 A A A A A 3 3 1990 19952003A2003B 4 2 198719941997 1995 1995 3 5 6 1998: 30 40 19701992 7

火災危険１.PDF

1994 22 NFPA(National Fire Protection Association ) USFA(United States Fire Administration ) NFPA USFA NFPA 64 NFPA J.Hall ( ) 1),2),3),4) 20.7 15 1994 33 18 GDP 5),6) 50 72.1 19851989 94.6 89.4 89.3 19881997

IMES DISCUSSION PAPER SERIES Discussion Paper No. 99-J-17 INSTITUTE FOR MONETARY AND ECONOMIC STUDIES BANK OF JAPAN 100-8630 203 IMES Discussion Paper Series 99-J-17 1999 6 * JEL classification E52 E58

60 Vol. 44 No. 1 2 準市場 化の制度的枠組み: 英国 教育改革法 1988 の例 Education Reform Act a School Performance Tables LEA 4 LEA LEA 3

Summer 08 59 I はじめに quasi market II III IV V 1 II 教育サービスにおける 準市場 1 教育サービスにおける 準市場 の意義 Education Reform Act 1988 1980 Local Education Authorities LEA Le Grand 1991 Glennerster 1991 3 1 2 3 2 60 Vol. 44

社会関係資本と外国人に対する寛容さに関する研究―JGSS-2008 の分析から―

JGSS-2008 Social Capital and Tolerance toward Foreigners in Japan: Analysis of JGSS-2008 Emi OOKA School of Sociology Kwansei Gakuin University The goal of this paper is to explore how tolerance towards

02古郡氏李氏_a_4.indd

55 2014 e.g2004 2005 2001 1980 101990 1 2 2002 2003 25,000 20038,000 2013 10 2013 1,787 21.623 4,302 1 HUD portal.hud. gov/.../huddoc?id=pih2013 15.pdf... 2 14 105 30,000 25,000 25,296 20,000 15,000 10,000

,255 7, ,355 4,452 3,420 3,736 8,206 4, , ,992 6, ,646 4,

30 8 IT 28 1,260 3 1 11. 1101. 1102. 1103. 1 3 1,368.3 3 1,109.8 p.5,p.7 2 9,646 4,291 14.5% 10,p.11 3 3,521 8 p.13 45-49 40-44 50-54 019 5 3 1 2,891 3 6 1 3 95 1 1101 1102 1103 1101 1102 1103 1 6,255

橡DP9802.PDF

21 Japan s Labor Force in the Year 2020 2020 2020 600 30 60 65 30 21 20 20 2020 2020 (1) 1 (2) (3) 1 1992 9 2025 2025 1997 1 2050 10 2050-1 - consensus estimate 21 (1995) (1997) (estimation) calibration

160_cov.indd

3 1 2 3 1. 2. 2.1 7 3 1996 welfare to work 2. 1 195 196 197 198 99 Autumn 7 No. 16 4. 3.5 3. 2.5 2. 1.5 1..5. 195 1952 1954 1956 1958 196 1962 1964 1966 1968 197 1972 1974 1976 1978 198 1982 1984 1986

19世紀の物価動向―コンドラチェフによる物価長波の検討を通じて―＊

19 GDP 1814 1815 1849 1846 1 2 61 2002 1 1991167 2 334 1 3 4 5 19 13 1823-1851 1884-1896 1884-1896 2 1823-1851 1884-1896 2 1 11 19 12 34 3 4 5 2 1 1789-1814-1849 1849-1873-1896 1896-1920-1940 2 6 Mitchell1998

「リストラ中高年」の行方

ESRI Discussion Paper Series No.10 by February 2002 Economic and Social Research Institute Cabinet Office Tokyo, Japan 1 ESRI 2 ABSTRACT * In this paper, based on the Employment Trend Survey in 2000 and

Title ベンチャー企業の研究開発支出の決定要因 日本と台湾の事例を中心に Author(s) 蘇, 顯揚 Citation 經濟論叢 (1996), 158(1): Issue Date URL Right

Title ベンチャー企業の研究開発支出の決定要因 日本と台湾の事例を中心に Author(s) 蘇, 顯揚 Citation 經濟論叢 (1996), 158(1): 54-76 Issue Date 1996-07 URL https://doi.org/10.14989/45083 Right Type Departmental Bulletin Paper Textversion publisher

JICA JETRO

Kyoto Bulletin of Islamic Area Studies, 9 (March 2016), pp. 197 230 JICA JETRO Area Studies TISCO Tata Steel Europe UNDP FS mélange J aime tuffāh uhibbu une pomme camarade A B Ph.D. EU EU EU EU EU EU

untitled

2 book conference 1990 2003 14 Repeated Cross-Section Data 1 M1,M2 M1 Sekine(1998) Repeated Cross-Section Data 1 1. (1989), Yoshida and Rasche(1990), Rasche(1990), 19921997, Fujiki and Mulligan(1996),

日本労働研究機構『ＩＴ活用企業についての実態調査』及び

March 200 1 1 15 29 49 5 59 2000 2007 2007 2007 5 2008 3 B 1 3 2005 20 44 2 1 2 3 1 2 3 2 4 2003 General Social Surveys 2003 5 5 20 49 2005 5 2 2008 3 31 2007 B 2007 2008 3 200418 49 50 2005 30 1990

Ellis 1970 Oxford (1990) SILL(Strategy Inventory for Language Learning) (Rubin, 1975; Naiman, Fröhlich, Stern, & Todesco, 1978)Rubin(1975) verbal-repo

No.7,689-700 (2006) Second Language Acquisition and Learning Strategies MOTOKI Yoshiko Nihon University, Graduate School of Social and Cultural Studies Recently, in an area of studying a foreign language,

開発金融増刊号

4 6 Y = f (, E, Y E ( Y E = α ( E α we py α 0 β E ( ( E β ( E β 6 ( = ( α β ( E β 8 i Y i f i, E i, i 9 Y = α α ( α E α S E 0 ( β β E β E( β E β β6 ( we Y = = = α β E py E β ( β Y Y B Y A r / pr p Y

The Institute for Economic Studies Seijo University 6 1 20, Seijo, Setagaya Tokyo 157-8511, Japan The Institute for Economic Studies Green Paper No. 59 Consumers Decision on the Choice of Small Payment

62

UNDP GEM 61 62 o 63 64 65 IPU IPU 66 o 67 68 69 IPU o 70 71 72 73 ,, NGO NGO IPU 74 NGO o 75 76 Sawer, Marian. 2000. Parliamentary Representation of Women: From Discourses of Justice to Strategies of Accountability,

<96D889BA904D2E696E6464>

615 379 1 1995 10 OECD 1995 380 616 57 3 1993 4 3071 2003 1 3247 10 10 4 1 1990 2000 2003 10 617 381 2002 2 3 4 5 2 1 1990 1995 1995 12 1995 IPP Independent Power Producer 1 2004a, b 2005a, b 382 618 57

目次はじめに 1. 賃金上昇動向とその要因 賃金上昇の影響 最後に はじめに CLMV RIM 213 Vol.13 No.48 51

高賃金政策の影響 要 旨 調査部 研究員 熊谷章太郎 211 5 RIM 213 Vol.13 No.48 目次はじめに 1. 賃金上昇動向とその要因 1 2 2. 賃金上昇の影響 1 2 3 最後に はじめに 211 212 CLMV RIM 213 Vol.13 No.48 51 1. 賃金動向と上昇要因 (1) 賃金動向 211 21211, 1 211 図表 1 平均賃金の推移 図表 2 産業別名目平均賃金上昇率

BB 報告書完成版_修正版）040415.doc

3 4 5 8 KW Q = AK α W β q = a + α k + βw q = log Q, k = log K, w = logw i P ij v ij P ij = exp( vij ), J exp( v ) k= 1 ik v i j = X β αp + γnu j j j j X j j p j j NU j j NU j (

46−ª3�=4�“ƒ‚S“·‚Ö‡¦

463420101 1. 1989, Yoshida and Rasche1990, Rasche1990, 19921997, Fujiki and Mulligan1996, 1996, Sekine1998, 2001, Fujiki2002, 2003, 2004 Bahmani-Oskooee and Shabsigh1996, Amano and Wirjanto2000, Bahmani-Oskooee

untitled

The theory of investment, effective demand, and effective supply MURASE Naoyuki 2008 GDP 90 1970 80 Leijonhufvud, A.xel(1968) IS-LM IS-LM (1936) 3 N Z N proceeds; N D N (1936) 7 (1952) 1936 f(n) (N) N

商学　６６‐６☆／７．松浦

1139 2008 9 2008 9 FRB : Federal Reserve Board FRB FRB 1140 1 2008 9 1 1999 2013 Bureau of Economic Analysis, Survey of Current Bunisess, International Data http : //www.bea.gov. 2014 8 10 1141 2000 1

高齢化とマクロ投資比率―国際パネルデータを用いた分析―

196 2017 * ** ** ** ** 160 2 2 JEL Classification Codes E21, E22, J11 Keywords * ESRI 28 ESRI 29 3 17 ESRI ** 115 196 Population Aging and Domestic Investment An Analysis Using International Panel Data

国際法と先制的自衛

200220 51 51 2002. 12.10, p.56.,, 1993, p.937. 28 2004. 1928, 1953, p.400., 1960, p.542., 2003, p.550,,, 1999, pp.503505. 100 10,, 2001, p.278., 1975, pp.7076. 2004. 29 51 51 10 1945 183711 11 183712 20

........,.,.,..,.,.,.,.,.,.,.,., International Capital Market Litan et al a b c d M&A a a b E- e- Litan et al. : Table Levine World Bank Levine Greenwald et al. B R F R r R R r B R r B R r B R R Stiglitz