わが国企業による資金調達方法の選択問題

Similar documents
わが国企業による株主還元策の決定要因:配当・自社株消却のインセンティブを巡る実証分析

戦間期日本企業の資金調達、資本コスト、資本構成:最適資本構成理論からみた1930年代における企業財務

取引銀行の破綻が企業経営に及ぼす影響について-阪和銀行破綻の事例分析-

Y-...W

2_赤羽.indd

aragciv54mac.dvi

BB 報告書完成版_修正版) doc

<96D889BA904D2E696E6464>

株式保有構成と企業価値 ─コーポレート・ガバナンスに関する一考察─

082_rev2_utf8.pdf

headquarter Gertner et al. winner-picking Wal-Mart s

情報と投資行動:選択型実験法を利用したフレーミング効果の検証

autocorrelataion cross-autocorrelataion Lo/MacKinlay [1988, 1990] (A)

# _信金7月号.indb

p *2 DSGEDynamic Stochastic General Equilibrium New Keynesian *2 2

ID JJF00296 Earnings management and market timing: The case of Japanese management buyouts Yasutomo Tsukioka 2-16 Japan Journal of Finance Vol.

23_02.dvi

03.Œk’ì

Microsoft Word - Šv”|“Å‘I.DOC

[17]Holmström and Tirole (2000) (1) (2) (1) (2) 1 1 2

Hi-Stat Discussion Paper Series No.248 東京圏における 1990 年代以降の住み替え行動 住宅需要実態調査 を用いた Mixed Logit 分析 小林庸平行武憲史 March 2008 Hitotsubashi University Research Unit

第3章.DOC

論文08.indd



untitled

遺産相続、学歴及び退職金の決定要因に関する実証分析 『家族関係、就労、退職金及び教育・資産の世代間移転に関する世帯アンケート調査』

2 1,2, , 2 ( ) (1) (2) (3) (4) Cameron and Trivedi(1998) , (1987) (1982) Agresti(2003)

橡同居選択における所得の影響(DP原稿).PDF

M&A の経済分析:M&A はなぜ増加したのか

上場変更と株価:株主分散と流動性変化のインパクト

BIS CDO CDO CDO CDO Cifuentes and O Connor[1] Finger[6] Li[8] Duffie and Garleânu[4] CDO Merton[9] CDO 1 CDO CDO CDS CDO three jump model Longstaff an

カルマンフィルターによるベータ推定( )

Auerbach and Kotlikoff(1987) (1987) (1988) 4 (2004) 5 Diamond(1965) Auerbach and Kotlikoff(1987) 1 ( ) ,

時間割引:双曲割引と弱加法性

Jorgenson F, L : L: Inada lim F =, lim F L = k L lim F =, lim F L = 2 L F >, F L > 3 F <, F LL < 4 λ >, λf, L = F λ, λl 5 Y = Const a L a < α < CES? C


Ishi

Tran Thi Van Anh

1 CAPM: I-,,, I- ( ) 1 I- I- I- ( CAPM) I- CAPM I- 1 I- Jensen Fama-French 3 I- Fama-French 3 I- Fama-MacBeth I- SMB-FL, HML-FL Fama-MacBeth 1 Fama-Fr


Becker 1965 Gronau a a a

日本の高齢者世帯の貯蓄行動に関する実証分析

59-1・2 鳥居昭夫・春日教測 .pwd


DP

Law and Economics Review vol.4,no.1(february 2009) 1998

表紙_目次.PDF

2 A A 3 A 2. A [2] A A A A 4 [3]

z.prn(Gray)

日本の教育経済学:実証分析の展望と課題.pdf


LA-VAR Toda- Yamamoto(1995) VAR (Lag Augmented vector autoregressive model LA-VAR ) 2 2 Nordhaus(1975) 3 1 (D2)

( β K ) p β W W p β K K aβ β W W β β K K ) 1/(βW +β K ) 3 ln C =lnα + 1 β W + β K ln Q (3) 1/(β W + β K ) ( β W + β K ) 4 ( ) ( ) ( ) ( 1998

untitled

y i OLS [0, 1] OLS x i = (1, x 1,i,, x k,i ) β = (β 0, β 1,, β k ) G ( x i β) 1 G i 1 π i π i P {y i = 1 x i } = G (

ボーナス制度と家計貯蓄率-サーベイ・データによる再検証-

Stepwise Chow Test * Chow Test Chow Test Stepwise Chow Test Stepwise Chow Test Stepwise Chow Test Riddell Riddell first step second step sub-step Step

D F I CP (equity finance) CP (debt finance) ( )

濱田弘潤 : 多角化企業の利潤分析 77 多角化企業の利潤分析 多角化ディスカウントの寡占理論による説明 * 濱田弘潤 (diversification discount) Keywords: JEL classifications: D43, L13, L22, G

J. JILA 64 (5), 2001

「スウェーデン企業におけるワーク・ライフ・バランス調査 」報告書

税制改正にともなう家計の所得弾性値 : 高齢者パネルデータによる実証分析

2) 3) 2) Ohkusa, 1996 ; 1999 ; Ohtake and Ohkusa, 1994 ; La Croix and A. Kawamura, Reject American Economic Review, Journal of Political Econom

Vol.8 No (July 2015) 2/ [3] stratification / *1 2 J-REIT *2 *1 *2 J-REIT % J-REIT J-REIT 6 J-REIT J-REIT 10 J-REIT *3 J-

PFI

OECD Benartzi and Thaler Brown et al. Mottla and Utkus Rooiji et al. Atkinson et al. MacFarland et al. Elton et al. Tang et al. Benartzi and Thaler Br

所得税と課税最低限に関する一考察

seminar0220a.dvi

物価指数の計測誤差と品質調整手法:わが国CPIからの教訓

To Our Shareholders 1

L Y L( ) Y0.15Y 0.03L 0.01L 6% L=(10.15)Y 108.5Y 6%1 Y y p L ( 19 ) [1990] [1988] 1

Public Pension and Immigration The Effects of Immigration on Welfare Inequality The immigration of unskilled workers has been analyzed by a considerab

untitled

I- Fama-French 3, Idiosyncratic (I- ) I- ( ) 1 I- I- I- 1 I- I- Jensen Fama-French 3 SMB-FL, HML-FL I- Fama-French 3 I- Fama-MacBeth Fama-MacBeth I- S

合理的個人VS

130 Oct Radial Basis Function RBF Efficient Market Hypothesis Fama ) 4) 1 Fig. 1 Utility function. 2 Fig. 2 Value function. (1) (2)

(1) (Karlan, 2004) (1) (1973) (1978) (1991) (1991) 1

Title 最適年金の理論 Author(s) 藤井, 隆雄 ; 林, 史明 ; 入谷, 純 ; 小黒, 一正 Citation Issue Date Type Technical Report Text Version publisher URL


COE-RES Discussion Paper Series Center of Excellence Project The Normative Evaluation and Social Choice of Contemporary Economic Systems Graduate Scho

46−ª3�=4�“ƒ‚S“·‚Ö‡¦

高齢化の経済分析.pdf

01社会学部研究紀要.indd

非上場企業におけるコーポレート・ガバナンス

IMES DISCUSSION PAPER SERIES Discussion Paper No. 99-J- 9 -J-19 INSTITUTE FOR MONETARY AND ECONOMIC STUDIES BANK OF JAPAN

168. W rdrop. W rdrop ( ).. (b) ( ) OD W rdrrop r s x t f c q δ, 3.4 ( ) OD OD OD { δ, = 1 if OD 0

02.„o“φiflì„㙃fic†j

Mantel-Haenszelの方法

Title ベンチャー企業の研究開発支出の決定要因 日本と台湾の事例を中心に Author(s) 蘇, 顯揚 Citation 經濟論叢 (1996), 158(1): Issue Date URL Right

1 Flores, D. (009) All you can drink: should we worry about quality? Journal of Regulatory Economics 35(1), Saggi, K., and Vettas, N. (00) On in

_™rfic

Isogai, T., Building a dynamic correlation network for fat-tailed financial asset returns, Applied Network Science (7):-24, 206,


本邦株式市場の流動性に関する動学的考察―東京証券取引所のティック・データ分析―

研究シリーズ第40号

2 / 24

わが国のレポ市場について―理論的整理と実証分析―

2 DEA Bain Mann Strickland and Weiss Structure Conduct Performance S-C-P Brozen Demsetz

日本内科学会雑誌第102巻第4号

Transcription:

* takeshi.shimatani@boj.or.jp ** kawai@ml.me.titech.ac.jp *** naohiko.baba@boj.or.jp No.05-J-3 2005 3 103-8660 30

No.05-J-3 2005 3 1990 * E-mailtakeshi.shimatani@boj.or.jp ** E-mailkawai@ml.me.titech.ac.jp *** E-mailnaohiko.baba@boj.or.jp 1

1990 90 [2000] 1990 1 Hirota[1999] [2004] 1970 1990 500 700 1992 2003 GMM 1996 2003 2 1 3 2 2

3 3 3 [2004] 3

2 1990 3 4 5 1990 90 1 93 99 2002 6 94 3 1 2003 4

1 + + + 2 2 98 97 95 5

1997 1 3 90 97-98 [2004] 1 DI 2 DI 6

4 90 2000 97 98 96 1 4 496 20 2003 6 1 2 IN database 5 10 9 90 4 [2004] 7

6 99 99 Bloomberg Bloomberg 1990 8

4 4 4 5 MM 6 2 7 pecking order 5 Harris and Raviv [1991] 6 Modigliani and Miller [1958] 7 11 BOX 9

Myers and Majluf [1984] Jensen [1986] Aghion and Bolton [1992] 8 Baker and Wurgler [2002] 8 10

[2004] 4 [2004] 1 [2004] * [2004] i t d it xkit k = 1L K d * it = β + β x + β x + L+ β x 0 1 1it 2 2it K Kit, i = 1L I t = 1LT (1b) i t d it * d = ( d d ) d λ (2b) it it 1 it it it 1 zlit l = 1L L λ = γ + γ z + γ z + L+ γ z it 0 1 1it 2 2it L Lit (3b) (1b) (3b) (2b) d it ( β + β x + + β x ) = ( ( γ + γ z + L+ γ z )) 0 1 1it L K Kit 1 0 1 1it L Lit ( d it ( β 0 + β1x1 it + + β K xkit )) + ηi + ε it L 1 (4b) ηi i ε it (4b) dynamic model 1 GMM 1 2 1990 A BBB 92 2000 A 2000 20 13 11

2 1990 multinomial logit model McFadden[1973]Green[2000] 3 9 3 i J +1 j U ( yi = j) U ij uij ε ij U = + ε (1) ij u ij ij i j j k { } U ij > max U (2) ik U ij ε ij i j Prob y = j ( ij ik ik ) ( y = j) = Prob u ij + ε = max{ u + ε } k ( ) Prob i (3) i 9 Nerlove and Press [1973] models with discrete dependent variables probit model 12

i m i ( x, x 2,, x ) x (4) i1 i K im j u ij u ij = β + x + x + + β x = β j0 β j1 i1 β j2 i2 K jm im jxi (5) β jl i l ε ij 10 Prob ( y = j) ( β x ) exp i = J j i for j = 0,1, L, J exp k= 0 ( β x ) k i (6) (6) xi J +1 (6) β 0 = 0 11 (6) Prob ( y = j) ( β x ) j i i = forj = 1, L, J 1+ exp k= 1 exp ( β x ) k i J (7) 10 conditional logit model ordered logit model nested logit model 3 11 β0 = 0 13

Prob ( = 0) y i = 1 + J k= 1 1 exp ( β x ) k i (8) 12 ln L N J = i= 1 j= 0 d ( y j) ij ln Prob i = (9) dij i j 1 0 β γ j marginal effect β (6) P J j γ j = = P j[ β j Pk β k ] = P j[ β j β] for j = 0,1L, J (10) x ( P Prob j) i j y i = k = 0 β i (10) γ j β j 12 2 IIAIndependence of Irrelevant Alternatives 14

8 8 13 14 1 1 9 2 2003 IT 99 9 IT 13 0 2 1 Train [2003] 14 0.5 15

y i = 0 2,355 y i = 1 1,546 y i = 2 422 y i = 3 64 y i = 4 58 y i = 5 408 y i = 6 45 y i = 7 70 4,968 16

3 QUICK AMSUS IN Bloomberg 1996-2003 621 8 4,968 12 10 A 1,325BBB 810 2,833 11 90 65 59 42 33 31 29 28 26 26 21 19 16 16 16 13 13 12 10 10 9 8 5 5 4 4 3 3 3 2 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 A 202 235 228 179 172 157 BBB 35 113 120 134 140 139 384 273 273 308 309 325 R&I 1998 97 98 t [2004] 17

t TOPIX t 15 16 17 Rajan and Zingales [1995] 18

18 t 19 A BBB % 7.9 5.7 8.0 8.9 % 2.4 0.6 2.1 3.3 % 16.1 21.7 12.9 14.4 % 1.7 5.2 6.0-1.1 32,349 57,990 34,814 19,651 % 33.2 34.5 36.1 31.7 6,709 11,118 10,295 3,622 83.7 110.9 63.4 73.5 51.6 79.4 13.0 47.3 300.6 191.0 194.5 362.1 4503.2 2716.2 3792.4 5526.1 3,701,958,872 5,006,823,536 3,010,315,020 2,821,464,518 233.6 222.4 224.2 236.3 657,227,802 842,027,581 813,779,923 504,267,795 13 A BBB A A 18 19 19

621 TOPIX 20

1415 t 21

2 22

t -0.529 0.099-5.358*** 0.064-1.479 0.617-2.396*** -0.255-0.527 0.242-2.183** 0.018-0.094 0.057-1.644* -0.001 0.642 0.227 2.828*** 0.029 0.303E-06 0.140E-05 0.217-5.622E-07 0.541E-05 0.407E-05 1.330* 2.454E-07-2.798 0.153-18.316*** -0.143-0.312 0.703-0.444 0.036-1.671 0.326-5.130*** -0.072-0.367 0.093-3.951*** -0.019 2.333 0.349 6.687*** 0.129 0.116E-04 0.142E-05 8.138*** 6.785E-07 0.162E-04 0.433E-05 3.735*** 8.008E-07-3.576 0.288-12.416*** -0.033 0.513 1.598 0.321 0.015-3.943 0.649-6.076*** -0.039 0.302 0.085 3.568*** 0.005 0.290 0.775 0.374-0.003 0.955E-05 0.284E-05 3.358*** 8.476E-08-0.728E-05 0.126E-04-0.577-1.575E-07-3.000 0.323-9.293*** -0.023 1.697 1.524 1.113-0.028-3.854 0.643-5.992*** -0.035 0.062 1.177 0.348 0.002-2.007 0.896-2.239*** -0.030 0.616E-05 0.279E-05 2.208** 3.723E-08 0.166E-04 0.513E-05 3.235*** 1.311E-07-2.873 0.162-17.690*** -0.143-1.121 0.810-1.384* -0.031-1.587 0.344-4.612*** -0.062-0.538 0.115-4.691*** -0.033 2.447 0.365 6.699*** 0.132 0.108E-04 0.145E-05 7.433*** 5.867E-07 0.188E-04 0.433E-05 4.351*** 9.809E-07-3.011 0.370-8.141*** -0.018-5.421 3.038-1.784** -0.042-4.740 0.846-5.601*** -0.035 0.190 0.089 2.125** 0.002-1.492 0.966-1.544* -0.018 0.753E-05 0.337E-05 2.238*** 4.290E-08-0.553E-05 0.110E-04-0.503-9.485E-08-3.929 0.328-11.976*** -0.038-4.885 2.375-2.057** -0.058-4.022 0.667-6.030*** -0.043 0.085 0.155 0.551 0.003 1.517 0.795 1.908** 0.009 0.946E-05 0.207E-05 4.560*** 7.743E-08 0.212E-04 0.507E-05 4.189*** 1.973E-07-6278.45 1. White [1980] 2. t *10% **5% ***1% t 23

t -0.570 0.101-5.630*** 0.056-0.282 0.416-0.678-0.048-0.281 0.222-1.267 0.060-0.100 0.056-1.765** -0.003 0.577 0.228 2.530*** 0.021 0.633E-06 0.139E-05 0.456-5.006E-07 0.565E-05 0.406E-05 1.390* 2.854E-07-2.834 0.154-18.394*** -0.144 0.695 0.560 1.242 0.066-1.515 0.306-4.944*** -0.070-0.359 0.092-3.894*** -0.019 2.158 0.345 6.257*** 0.118 0.118E-04 0.143E-05 8.219*** 6.826E-07 0.163E-04 0.433E-05 3.762*** 7.974E-07-3.341 0.353-9.452*** -0.030-3.627 1.602-2.265** -0.042-4.203 0.629-6.686*** -0.044 0.354 0.081 4.398*** 0.006 0.666 0.809 0.824 0.002 0.841E-05 0.303E-05 2.777*** 6.939E-08-0.700E-05 0.125E-04-0.559-1.533E-07-3.152 0.316-9.979*** -0.025 2.132 1.266 1.684** 0.027-4.218 0.620-6.798*** -0.040 0.059 0.144 0.406 0.002-1.847 0.829-2.226*** -0.028 0.633E-05 0.287E-05 2.204** 3.765E-08 0.164E-04 0.530E-05 3.102*** 1.270E-07-2.900 0.165-17.619*** -0.144-0.177 0.608-0.291-0.008-1.398 0.313-4.473*** -0.058-0.543 0.115-4.718*** -0.033 2.373 0.366 6.481*** 0.131 0.110E-04 0.145E-05 7.568*** 5.917E-07 0.190E-04 0.432E-05 4.396*** 9.831E-07-2.679 0.438-6.112*** -0.015-7.278 1.903-3.825*** -0.063-4.172 0.675-6.182*** -0.031 0.240 0.105 2.281*** 0.003-1.654 1.097-1.507* -0.019 0.695E-05 0.354E-05 1.964* 3.688E-08-0.431E-05 0.108E-04-0.400-8.286E-08-4.090 0.302-13.558*** -0.040 0.241 1.197 0.202 0.005-3.219 0.547-5.884*** -0.034 0.056 0.152 0.367 0.003 1.172 0.859 1.363* 0.005 0.105E-04 0.204E-05 5.145*** 8.995E-08 0.214E-04 0.508E-05 4.214*** 1.984E-07-6276.62 1. White [1980] 2. t *10% **5% ***1% t 24

i (6) Prob ( y = j) ( β x ) exp i = J j i forj = 0,1, L, J exp k = 0 ( β x ) k i β xi 16 20 A BBB 13 A A A 21 BBB 1996 1 20 21 A 25

17 A BBB 26

96-98 99-01 02-03 96-98 99-01 02-03 0.3117 0.3160 0.3108 0.3065 0.0849 0.0860 0.0860 0.0818 0.0027 0.0022 0.0028 0.0034 0.0044 0.0039 0.0045 0.0048-3.4728-3.6574-3.4911-3.1804 2.9358 2.9575 2.9352 2.9217 13.5470 15.2283 13.8068 10.9358 10.4118 10.6708 10.5196 9.9405 0.0129 0.0105 0.0123 0.0174 0.0117 0.0110 0.0114 0.0131 0.0004 0.0001 0.0002 0.0012 0.0002 0.0001 0.0002 0.0005 15.5188 12.3606 11.8850 10.9098 11.8426 8.6750 11.7414 10.0730 346.9668 232.9360 224.2261 152.8199 210.7045 140.3390 235.0579 129.0683 27

. 1990 28

[2004] 2004 [2004] No.04-J-15 [2000]90 2000-01 Aghion, P., and P. Bolten [1992], An Incomplete Contracts Approach to Financial Contracting, Review of Economic Studies 59, pp.473-494. Baker, M., and J. Wurgler [2002], Market Timing and Capital Structure, Journal of Finance 62, pp. 1-32. Greene, W. H. Econometric Analysis, 4 th Edition, Prentice-Hall, Inc., 2000 Harris, M. and A. Raviv [1991], The Theory of Capital Structure, Journal of Finance 46, pp.297-355. Hirota, S. [1999], Are Corporate Financing Decisions Different in Japan?: An Empirical Study on Capital Structure, Journal of the Japanese and International Economies 13, pp.201-229. Jensen, M. C.[1986], Agency Costs of Free Cash Flow, Corporate Finance, and Takeovers, American Economic Review 76, pp.323-329. McFadden, D.[1973], Conditional Logit Analysis of Quantitative Choice Behavior, In P. Zerembka, ed., Frontier in Econometrics, New York: Academic Press. Modigliani, F., and M. H. Miller [1958], The Cost of Capital, Corporation Finance and the Theory of Investment, American Economic Review 48, pp.261-297. Myers, S., and N. Majluf [1984], Corporate Financing and Investment Decisions When Firms have Information that Investors Do not Have, Journal of Financial Economics, 13, pp.187-221. Nerlove, M., and S. Press, Univariate and Multivariate Log-linear and Logistic Models, RAND-R1306-EDA/NIH, Santa Monica, 1973. Rajan, R. G., and L. Zingales [1995], What Do We Know About Capital Structure?: Some Evidence from International Data, Journal of Finance 50, pp.1421-1460. Train, K., Discrete Choice Methods with Simulation, Cambridge University Press, 2003. White, H. [1980], A Heteroskedasticity-Consistent Covariance Matrix and a Direct Test for Heteroskedasticity, Econometrica 48, pp.721-746. 29