59-72OGUMA.indd

Similar documents
LCC LCC INOUE, Gaku TANSEI, Kiyoteru KIDO, Motohiro IMAMURA, Takahiro LCC 7 LCC Ryanair 1 Ryanair Number of Passengers 2,000,000 1,800,000 1,

07[ ]河越(責)山.indd

資料3.doc

公務員倫理問題への新アプローチ

untitled

LCC LCC LCC i LCC ii iii LCC iv v EC vi vii LCC LCC LCC ASEAN viii ASEAN LCC ix ASEAN LCC LCC LCC LCC x LCC

表紙_目次.PDF

LCC LCC LCC i LCC ii iii LCC iv v EC vi vii LCC LCC LCC ASEAN viii ASEAN LCC ix ASEAN LCC LCC LCC LCC 2. 日 本 における LCC の 成 長 x LCC

Kobe University Repository : Kernel タイトル Title 著者 Author(s) 掲載誌 巻号 ページ Citation 刊行日 Issue date 資源タイプ Resource Type 版区分 Resource Version 権利 Rights DOI

独禁法上の正当化理由と独禁法適用除外制度について(航空市場における市場画定を手掛かりとして)

Trans European Networks TENs TENs 90 TENs TEN T 1997 TEN T TEN T CEC, TEN T TEN T 1996TEN T Pan-European Transport

17 The Impact of Low-Cost Carriers Entry and Passengers Airline Choice in Thailand Asian Institute of Technology ( C ) Dr. Shinya HANAOKA, Institute f

Association of South East Asian Nations: ASEAN ASEAN ASEAN ASEAN ASEAN ASEAN ASEAN


Journal of International and Advanced Japanese Studies Volume 4 / March

2

- March IMF IMF IMF ITO The General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade

Hansen 1 2, Skinner 5, Augustinus 6, Harvey 7 Windle 8 Pels 9 1 Skinner 5 Augustinus 6 Pels 9 NL Harvey ML 11 NL

産業・企業レベルデータで見た日本の経済成長.pdf

GDPギャップと潜在成長率


欧州における空港会社の戦略展開 : 複数一括運営の推進を中心として

BB 報告書完成版_修正版) doc

2-栗原.TXT

1 1 1 [2000]

RIETI Highlight VOL.25

中京大学経済学論叢 23 号 2012 年 3 月 審査論文 1 Keywords: JEL Classi cation: L13, L22, L33 1 * *1 Inoue, Kamijo, and Tomaru (2009) Mukherjee and Suestrong

OSIPP41_p1_2.eps

.... Quality Partnership. Mohring. Gwilliam et al. NPO Metropolitan Area Quality Partnership QP public subsidy

海保英孝111‐131/111‐131

No EITC, Earned Income Tax Credit WTC, Working Tax Credit; CTC, Child Tax Credit GSTC, Goods and Services Tax Credit a2006 b 2

bottleneckjapanese.dvi

はじめに

Masanori Hashimoto Rene Fahr and Hilmar Schneider 1. Hashimoto, Masanori Fahr, Rene and Hilmar Schneider Hashimoto, Masanori 2004 Fahr

Title ベンチャー企業の研究開発支出の決定要因 日本と台湾の事例を中心に Author(s) 蘇, 顯揚 Citation 經濟論叢 (1996), 158(1): Issue Date URL Right

untitled

No.8, (2007) Global Strategies of Tire Manufacturers for the Growing Economies of Eastern European and Latin American Countries USHIYAMA Yukio

201/扉

untitled

[1964] [1957] Core Peripheral 7 Mangan,John[2000] [1999] [1999]pp7-8 5 [1964]p89 6 Doeringer and

07-245_25.indd


Kobe University Repository : Kernel タイトル Title 著者 Author(s) 掲載誌 巻号 ページ Citation 刊行日 Issue date 資源タイプ Resource Type 版区分 Resource Version 権利 Rights DOI

物価変動の決定要因について ― 需給ギャップと物価変動の関係の国際比較を中心に―

OSIPP40_p1_2.eps

a 1 No

final.indd

精神障害者

中田真佐男 323‐352/323‐352

1

46−ª3�=4�“ƒ‚S“·‚Ö‡¦

商学 63‐3☆/6.山本

JSPS Grants-in-Aid for Creative Scientific Research Understanding Inflation Dynamics of the Japanese Economy Working Paper Series No.7 日本家計の消費 貯蓄 労働プロ

06陳.indd

”Лï‡Æ™²“¸_‚æ4“ƒ__‘dflÅPDF‘‚‡«‘o‡µ.pdf

物価指数の計測誤差と品質調整手法:わが国CPIからの教訓

東アジアへの視点

And Business

ICT ICT Information Communication Technology Castells & Himanen, 2002; -Alestalo et al, 2006

Winter 2009 No Lower Earnings Limit

ブック 1.indb


2) 3) 2) Ohkusa, 1996 ; 1999 ; Ohtake and Ohkusa, 1994 ; La Croix and A. Kawamura, Reject American Economic Review, Journal of Political Econom

OECD Benartzi and Thaler Brown et al. Mottla and Utkus Rooiji et al. Atkinson et al. MacFarland et al. Elton et al. Tang et al. Benartzi and Thaler Br

Ł\”ƒ1PDFŠp

28 Vol. 43 No. 1 2 Burchardt, Le Grand & Piachaud 1999 Bradshaw et al Gordon et al.2000 Whelan et al.2002 poverty de

Blue Ocean Strategy W. Chan Kim A. Mauborgne INSEAD INSEAD Production and Operations Management PhD Value Innovation Kim & Mauborgne, 1997

GDP tax expenditure GDP GDP GDP TANF GDP

リスクコミュニケーション概論

57 Table 1 アメリカ国内宅配便の種類 (UPSの事例) 種類 サービス名 配送日数 配送時間 運賃 ( ドル ) Express Critical 当日配送 Next Day Air Early 翌営業日午前 8 時 Next Day Air 翌営業日午前 10


Financial Reporting Standard 17 FRS17 FAS87 87 Financial Accounting Standard 87 FAS87 International Accounting Standard Board IASB 19 Internat


HP 76

<96D889BA904D2E696E6464>

2003年11月9日

- March

16

JICA JETRO

PS

Core Ethics Vol. Nerriere D.Hon EU GS NPO GS GS Oklahoma State University Kyoto Branch OSU-K OSU-K OSU-K

Robert S. Ross 7 Charles L. Glaser 8 Susan Shirk David Shambaugh, China Engages Asia: Reshaping the Regional Order Internationa

60 Vol. 44 No. 1 2 準市場 化の制度的枠組み: 英国 教育改革法 1988 の例 Education Reform Act a School Performance Tables LEA 4 LEA LEA 3

66-5 足代訓史.pwd

先端社会研究 ★5★号/4.山崎

Baba and Nobeoka CAE Computer Aided Engineering

EC・GMO事件


Sato, A, [4] R = Val Haz Vul (1) R: Val: Haz: ( ) Vul: () 0 1 / / (1) [5] [6] (preparedness) (JIS X0410)

H1-H4_政経研究_51-3.ai


A5 PDF.pwd

_PS1_hattori.indd

<346B5F BC8CC389AE91E58A A AD985F8F D A967B95B62E696E6462>

A: B: C: D: E: a: b: 1: 2: 3: 4: 5: 6: 7: Figure 1. Land-use around the Songkhla Lakes A: Rice field B: Urban area C: Fish/Shrimp ponds D: I

「多様な正社員」と非正規雇用

-February FRB BIS IMF BIS Spillover Spillovers BIS IMF EMEs


はじめに

, FAD FAD FED FAO FAO WFP 1999 NGO ) 1. FAD FAD 1999 Lee, FAD % national coping s

Transcription:

EULCC EU LCC 59

1. EU 1 EU 60 70 6 10.6

2 EU LCC 61

1 62 70 6 10.6

2 EU LCC 2. EU LCC 1 EU LCC EU LCC 63

1 EU LCC 2005 64 70 6 10.6

2 LCC EU LCC 65

2 LCC 66 70 6 10.6

3 LCC 2009 EU LCC 67

3. 68 70 6 10.6

EU LCC 69

70 70 6 10.6

Almadari, F., S., Fagan 2005, Impact of the Adherence to the Original Low-Cost Model on the Profitability of Low-Cost Airlines, Transport Reviews, Vol.25, No.3, pp.377-392. Alves, C.F., C., Barbot 2007, Do low cost carriers have different corporate governance models?, Journal of Air Transport Management, 13, pp. 116-120. Barbot, C. 2004, Low cost carriers, secondary airports and State aid: an economic assessment of the Charleroi affair, FEP Working Papers, No. 159, October 2004. Barbot, C. 2006, Low cost carriers, secondary airports and State aid: an economic assessment of the Ryanair Charleroi Airport agreement, Journal of Air Transport Management, 12, pp.197-203. Barrett, S.D. 2004a, How do the demands for airpor t ser vices dif fer between full-ser vice carriers and low-cost carriers?, Journal of Air Transport Management, 10, pp.33-39. Barrett, S.D. 2004b, The sustainability of the Ryanair model, International Journal of Transport Management, 2, pp.89-98. Brueckner, J.K., E., Pels 2005, European airline mergers, alliance consolidation, and consumer welfare, Journal of Air Transport Management, 11, pp.27-41. Dennis, N. 2005, Industry consolidation and future airline network structures in Europe, Journal of Air Transport Management, 11, pp.175-183. Dennis, N. 2007, End of the free lunch? The responses of traditional European airlines to the low-cost carrier threat, Journal of Air Transport Management, 13, pp.311-321. 10 Dobruszkes, F. 2006, An analysis of European low-cost airlines and their networks, Journal of Transport Geography, 14, pp.249-264. 11 Dobruszkes, F. 2009a, New Europe, new low cost air services, Journal of Transport Geography, 17, pp.423-432. 12 Dobruszkes, F. 2009b, Does liberalisation of air transport imply increasing competition? Lessons from the European case, Transport Policy, 16, pp. 29-39. 13 Doganis, R. 2000, The Airline Business in the Twenty-First Century, Rutledge 200321 2003 14 ELFAA European Low Fares Airline Association 2007, Social Benefits of Low Fares Airline in Europe, in association with the Forum of European Regional Airports & the Assembly of European Regions. EU LCC 71

15 European Commission 2004, The Commission s Decision on Charleroi Airport Promotes the Activities of Low Cost Airlines and Regional Airport, IP/04/ 157, No.3, Brussels, February 2004. 16 Francis, G., A., Fidato & Humphereys, I. 2003, Airport-airline interaction: the impact of low-cost carriers on two European airports, Journal of Air Transport Management, 9, pp.267-273. 17 Francis, G., I., Humphereys & Ison, S. 2004, Airports perspectives on the growth of low-cost airlines and the remodeling of the airport-airline relationship, Tourism Management, 25, pp.507-514. 18 Francis, G., N., Dennis, S., Ison & Humphereys, I. 2007, The transferability of the low-cost model to long-haul airline operations, Tourism Management, 28, pp.391-398. 19 Giaume, S., S., Guillou 2004, Price discrimination and concentration in European airline markets, Journal of Air Transport Management, 10, pp. 305-310. 20 Gröteke, F., W., Keber 2004, The Case of Ryanair EU State Aid Policy on the Wrong Runway, Nr. 13 Volkswirtschaftliche Beiträge, Marburg 2004. 21 Morrell, P. 2005, Airlines within airlines: An analysis of US network airline responses to Low Cost Carriers, Journal of Air Transport Management, 11, pp.303-312. 22 Oum,T.H. 1998, Overview of regulatory changes in international air transport and Asian strategies towards the US open skies initiatives, Journal of Air Transport Management, 4, pp. 127-134. 23 Oum, T.H., X., Fu 2008, Impacts of Airports on Airline Competition: Focus on Airport Performance and Airport-Airline Vertical Relations, OECD Joint Transport Research Center Discussion Paper, No.2008-17, September 2008. 24 Papatheodorou, A., Z., Lei 2006, Leisure travel in Europe and airline business models: A study of regional airports in Great Britain, Journal of Air Transport Management, 12, pp.47-52. 25 Trzepacz, P. 2007, Spatial Aspects of Air Transportation Liberalization Changes in European Airport Hierarchy, Bulletin of Geography Socio Economic Series, Jagiellonian University, Cracow, No.8, pp.163-177. 26 Wensveen, L.G., R., Leick 2009, The long-haul low-cost carrier: A unique business model, Journal of Air Transport Management, 15, pp.127-133. 272007 LCC LCC LCC 37-50 282007LCC LCC LCC 5-24 292009 22-30 302006 311994 EC 1994, 181-212 32 2003 332004 26-33 72 70 6 10.6