Grice (1957) S x p S A x 1. A p 2. A S 1 3. A S 1 p (intention-based semantics) S p x (Strawson 1964; Grice 1969; Schiffer 1972; Harman 1974; Bennett

Similar documents
33 (2016), 105 Abstract Keywords CAP Vol. 9 ( ) pp : : : :

1. interlanguage 1970 (phonology) morphology syntax Hymes 1972 (communicative competence) Interlanguage Pragmatics Blum- Kulka, House, & Kasper, 1989

06...E...z.....q.ec6

tikeya[at]shoin.ac.jp The Function of Quotation Form -tte as Sentence-final Particle Tomoko IKEYA Kobe Shoin Women s University Institute of Linguisti

<論文>英国貴族階級所帯内労働関係における呼称の検証--20世紀前半を時代背景とする映画を分析して

2016 Fall Lecture 05 on Comm HO

( ) ( ) ( 2001) (1995) (1993) ( ) ( 1997: 42) (1997: 61 70) 1) 2) 3) ( 1988) ( ) ) ( J ) 2) 20 3) 4) (2000)

untitled

SFCJ6-山中

Future like ours FLO Don Marquis, Why AborBon is Immoral, The Journal of Philosophy, vol.86,

jpssj

(’Ó)”R

null element [...] An element which, in some particular description, is posited as existing at a certain point in a structure even though there is no

八田

相愛・人文科学研究所年報 4号(よこ)/森光


言語文化論集24巻2号/07田中聡子

ナ畜ナ・カ (窶凖・

1 2 Japanese society and for implementation into its education system for the first time. Since then, there has been about 135 years of the history of

08教育内容開発コース 2014.indd

untitled

02 Communication Model & Process

58 1 Labov (1972) narrative (temporal juncture) (narrative clause) narrative Labov (1972) narrative Labov and Waletzkey (1967) narrative q Abstractw O

理恵(最終版)

本文/YAZ325T

自然な図形と不自然な図形: 幾何図形の二つの「意味」


1: NTT Yahoo! , , , , CIAIR CIAIR- ICSD CIAIR-ICSD 6 dlwz lg 3 30 dl wz 2 60 dl O D O:

Cognitive Studies, 22(1), (March 2015) Conversational interactions contribute not only to the sharing of information and establishment of cons

32 constructivism Rawls 1971, pp. 137, 158 Rawls 1971, pp Dworkin 2000, p Cohen 1989, p. 931 option luck neutralization Dworkin 200

NO95-1_62173.pdf

02 Communication Model & Process HO2018

18 BS BS BS Equivocation Theory Feldman et al マスメディアの 影 響 力 Lazarsfeld et.al., 1944 Two-Step Flow of

広報みさと indd

社会言語学:その仕組み、展望と社会の中での言葉遣いについて


Ellis 1970 Oxford (1990) SILL(Strategy Inventory for Language Learning) (Rubin, 1975; Naiman, Fröhlich, Stern, & Todesco, 1978)Rubin(1975) verbal-repo

....10_ /.]....


process of understanding everyday language is similar, finally as far as word production is concerned, individual variations seem to be greater at an

Abstract Although physicalism is usually understood as an ontological thesis, it is not clear that what implications this position has on th

橡LET.PDF

emarketer SNS / SNS 2009 SNS 15 64

<30362D906C95B638312D9B9A9271E7E92D93FA967B8CEA8A778F4B8ED282CC91E693F18CBE8CEA8F4B93BE82C68A778F4B B2E706466>

95NBK-final.dvi

On the Relation between the Deictic Use and the Non-deictic Use of the Japanese Demonstratives SATOSHI KINSUI* This paper addresses the status of deix

合理的個人VS


untitled

Reason Licence 6 innocent Delights

556†i’^”R”††j

% 95% 2002, 2004, Dunkel 1986, p.100 1

教育実践上の諸問題

...C...{ ren

What s your name? Help me carry the baggage, please. politeness What s your name? Help me carry the baggage, please. iii


2

18 No. 79, The Righteous Mind 3 2 altruisme Systeme de Politique Positive altruisme

Remix 1 Remix 1

2 4 U U x, y U 1 x, y x y x x, y U 5, 6 7 S S x x x P P 2 x P x x x U S P


日本語の謝罪表現「ごめんなさい」と「ごめん」について : ポライトネス理論からのアプローチ

ブックfor04_3.indb

( ) ( ) Modified on 2009/05/24, 2008/09/17, 15, 12, 11, 10, 09 Created on 2008/07/02 1 1) ( ) ( ) (exgen Excel VBA ) 2)3) 1.1 ( ) ( ) : : (1) ( ) ( )

論文発表会_2005年)レジメ.PDF

Microsoft Word - 厚生の平等_京阪経済研究会.doc

09‘o’–

- June 0 0


紀要1444_大扉&目次_初.indd

keyneshicks4.dvi

11_寄稿論文_李_再校.mcd

Shonan Institute of Technology MEMOIRS OF SHONAN INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY Vol. 38, No. 1, b9 199d8 1 * False Belief and Recognition of a Object

丁寧表現、敬語における普遍性と言語固有性 6.ppt

26 Development of Learning Support System for Fixation of Basketball Shoot Form

37_02_三田・栗田・マウラー02.indd

05能と手話詩との融合を目指して.PDF

05[ ]櫻井・小川(責)岩.indd

04長谷川英伸_様.indd

2011spTP

, 3 2 Marshall [1890]1920, Marshall [1890]1920

特別寄稿 1931 Kurt Gödel, inexhaustibility Jean Cavaillès,

C I S REPORTS 2016 Program in Curriculum and Instruction Sciences, Graduate School of Education,Hiroshima University

[2010]nanzan-paper1.01

白井転移(2)11.ppt


Jpn. J. Personality 18(2): (2009)

NINJAL Research Papers No.14

04(....) (..)..

p _08森.qxd

同意と強制

open / window / I / shall / the? something / want / drink / I / to the way / you / tell / the library / would / to / me

88 Merton 1957(orig. 1949): : Twitter Facebook SNS twilog 1 G. H. Mead

バークの代表論



助詞「に」の定量的分析の試み

商学 63‐3☆/6.山本

ÿþbÎW'Yf[


Transcription:

2016/10/21 1 (implicature) (presupposition) (speech act) Sperber & Wilson (1986/1995) (inferential model) 2 Sperber & Wilson (1986/1995) (code model) (1) (2) (3) (5) 1

Grice (1957) S x p S A x 1. A p 2. A S 1 3. A S 1 p (intention-based semantics) S p x (Strawson 1964; Grice 1969; Schiffer 1972; Harman 1974; Bennett 1976/1990; Grice 1982; Neale 1992; Davis 2003; Green 2007) (2014) MacKay (1968) Donnellan (1966) Donnellan (1966) the (attributive use) (referential use) MacKay (1968) Donnellan (1968) x p x p p x p 2

(see Buchanan 2010) (Cooperative Principle) (Grice 1975, p. 26) (Grice 1975, pp. 26-27) 1. 2. 1. 2. 1. 2. 3. 4. (Grice 1975, p. 30) *1 (implicature) *1 3

(Sperber & Wilson 1986/1995) 4

(2009) Grice (2001) 3 (Grice 1975) (Levinson 2000) (Sperber & Wilson 1986/1995) (Brown & Levinson 1987) Grice (1975) (politeness) 5

(what is said) p q q q q q (Grice 1975, p. 31) (1) A: I am out of petrol. B: There is a garage round the corner. (Grice 1975, p. 32, (1)) B A B B B (2) (Grice 1975, p. 34) 6

(3) a. Miss X sang Home Sweet Home. b. Miss X produced a series of sounds that corresponded closely with the score of Home Sweet Home. (Grice 1975, p. 37) (a) (b) (b) (a) (b) (b) (b) X (b) (a) 7

4 Levinson (1983) (contrasive pragmatics) Wierbicka (2003) Lepore & Stone (2015) Lepore & Stone (2015) Horvat (2000) (4) (5) (Horvat 2000, p. 117) (4) (5) (4) (5) Can you do us the favor of making us listen? (4) (5) Wierzbicka (1985) (6) (7) 8

(6) Would you like a beer? (7) Mia lbys ochotȩ na pivo? Davis (1998) 1. 2. a 3. 4. Lepore & Stone (2015) Davis (1998) (convention) 9

5 [1] Bennett, J. (1976/1990). Linguistic Behaviour. Hackett Publishing Company, Indianapolis. [2] Brown, P. & Levinson, S. C. (1987). Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. (,,,, 2011) [3] Buchanan, R. (2010). A puzzle about meaning and communication. Noûs, 44(2): 340-371. [4] Davis, W. A. (2003). Meaning, Expression, and Thought. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. [5] Donnellan, K. S. (1966). Reference and definite descriptions. The Philosophical Review, 75: 281-304. (,,,, 2013: 91-129 ) [6] Donnellan, K. S. (1968). Putting Humpty together again. The Philosophical Review, 77(2): 203-215. [7] Green, M. S. (2007). Self-Expression. Clarendon Press, Oxford. [8] Grice, P. Meaning. The Philosophival Review, 66: 377-388. Reprinted in P. Grice (1989): 213-223. [9] Grice, P. (1969). Utterer s meaning and intentions. The Philosophical Review, 68: 147-177. Reprinted in Grice (1989): 86-116. [10] Grice, P. (1975). Logic and conversation. In P. Cole & J. Morgan (ed.), Syntax and Semantics, Vol. 3, Academic Press, New York. Reprinted in Grice (1989): 22-40. [11] Grice, P. (1982). Meaning revisited. In N. V. Smith (ed.), Mutual Knowledge, Academic Press, New York: 223-243. Reprinted in Grice (1989): 283-303. [12] Grice, P. (1989). Studies in the Way of Words. Harvard University Press, Cambridge. (,,, 1998) 10

[13] Grice, P. (2001). Aspects of Reason. Clarendon Press, Oxford. (,,, 2013) [14] Harman, G. H. (1974). Review of Meaning by Stephen R. Schiffer. The Journal of Philosophy, 71: 224-229. [15] Levinson, S. C. (1983). Pragmatics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. (,,, 1990) [16] Levinson, S. C. (2000). Presumptive Meanings: The Theory of Generalized Conversational Implicature. The MIT Press, Cambridge. (,,, 2007) [17] MacKay, A. F. (1968). Mr. Donnellan and Humpty Dumpty on referring. The Philosophical Review, 77(2):197-202. [18] Neale, S. (1992). Paul Grice and the philosophy of language. Linguistics and Philosophy, 15: 509-559. [19] Schiffer, S. R. (1972). Meaning. Clarendon Press, Oxford. [20] Sperber, W. & Wilson, D. (1986/1995). Relevance: Communication and Cognition (2nd Ed.). Blackwell Publishing, Oxford. (,,, 2000) [21] Strawson, P. F. (1964). Intention and convention in speech acts. The Philosophical Review, 73: 439-460. Reprinted in Strawson (1971/2004): 115-130. [22] Strawson, P. F. (1971/2004). Logico-Linguistic Papers (2nd Ed.). Ashgate, Hants. [23] Wierzbicka, A. (1985). Different cultures, different languages, different speech acts: Polish vs. English. Journal of Pragmatics, 9: 145-178. [24] Wierzbicka, A. (2003). Cross-Cultural Pragmatics: The Semantics of Human Interaction (2nd Ed.). Mouton de Gruyter, Berlin. [25]. (2009).., 36: 68-79. [26]. (2014).. Contemporary and Applied Philosophy, 5: 1033-1051. 11