Preliminary Version Manning et al. (1986) Rand Health Insurance Experiment Manning et al. (1986) 3 Medicare Me

Similar documents
フィナンシャルレビュー 第80号

ed srv.cc.hit-u.ac.jp


橡同居選択における所得の影響(DP原稿).PDF

文部科学省科学研究費補助金特定領域研究B


Title 社会保険と保険者機能 Author(s) 中泉, 真樹 Citation Issue Date Type Technical Report Text Version publisher URL Right

66-5 足代訓史.pwd

平成20年2月10日号

‰gficŒõ/’ÓŠ¹

Ishi

untitled

2 2 2 (Poisson Distribution) P (y = j) = e λ λ j λ > 0, j = 0, 1, 2... j! j! j E(y) = V ar(y) = λ λ y x λ = λ(x iβ) f(y i x iβ) = exp( exp(x i β)) exp



2) 3) 2) Ohkusa, 1996 ; 1999 ; Ohtake and Ohkusa, 1994 ; La Croix and A. Kawamura, Reject American Economic Review, Journal of Political Econom

( β K ) p β W W p β K K aβ β W W β β K K ) 1/(βW +β K ) 3 ln C =lnα + 1 β W + β K ln Q (3) 1/(β W + β K ) ( β W + β K ) 4 ( ) ( ) ( ) ( 1998

税制改正にともなう家計の所得弾性値 : 高齢者パネルデータによる実証分析

1 はじめに 85

01-11_20-22.indd

16

C. R. McKenzie ( 38 ) (Keio Household Panel Survey) control group treatment group 1


わが国企業による資金調達方法の選択問題

4703ALL01


DOUSHISYA-sports_R12339(高解像度).pdf

z.prn(Gray)

制度の実証分析DP(鈴木)No3.PDF

,.,,.,. NIRA,.,.,,, GDP.,., 1%, 2.0% 3).,,.,,., 1, 4).,,.,, GDP,.,,.,,,.,,., 2002.,,., 3), Q&A Q16 (

規則帰納における方向性

Becker 1965 Gronau a a a

A5 PDF.pwd

Kansai University of Welfare Sciences Practical research on the effectiveness of the validation for the elderly with dementia Naoko Tsumura, Tomoko Mi

第3章.DOC

Autumn II III Zon and Muysken 2005 Zon and Muysken 2005 IV II 障害者への所得移転の経済効果 分析に用いるデータ

- March

日本人の子育て観-JGSS-2008 データに見る社会の育児能力に対する評価-

untitled

29 Short-time prediction of time series data for binary option trade



医療事故の現状と課題-医療事故への対応策の整備を中心に-

Evaluation of a SATOYAMA Forest Using a Voluntary Labor Supply Curve Version: c 2003 Taku Terawaki, Akio Muranaka URL: http

カルマンフィルターによるベータ推定( )

表紙参照.PDF


アジ研教科書「マクロ安定化」.PDF

untitled

日本における結婚観の変化―JGSS累積データ を用いた分析―

DP

MHN25_1p

(2004) (2002) (2004) ( 1990,Smith,Standinger, & Baltes,1994,Carstensen, et al., 2000) (1990) (2006)

精神障害者

越智59.qxd

flex06_01_28

59-1・2 鳥居昭夫・春日教測 .pwd

日本の高齢者世帯の貯蓄行動に関する実証分析

2 Tobin (1958) 2 limited dependent variables: LDV 2 corner solution 2 truncated censored x top coding censor from above censor from below 2 Heck

201/扉

02古郡氏李氏_a_4.indd

ワールド・ワイド 10‐2(P)/3.中尾

「スウェーデン企業におけるワーク・ライフ・バランス調査 」報告書

Mintzberg a, b 2017a, b Schmitt2000 Pine&Gilmore1999, 2011 Schmitt2000 CreatorEncounter

JSPS Grants-in-Aid for Creative Scientific Research Understanding Inflation Dynamics of the Japanese Economy Working Paper Series No.7 日本家計の消費 貯蓄 労働プロ

56 56 The Development of Preschool Children s Views About Conflict Resolution With Peers : Diversity of changes from five-year-olds to six-year-olds Y

商業学会発表資料( ).ppt

国際比較からみた介護システムの役割分担

OECD Benartzi and Thaler Brown et al. Mottla and Utkus Rooiji et al. Atkinson et al. MacFarland et al. Elton et al. Tang et al. Benartzi and Thaler Br

村本 孜51‐85/51‐85

28_04_斎藤正章.indd

Japanese Journal of Applied Psychology

財政のサステナビリティと長期金利の動向

? * Bernheim(1991) Annuity Offset Model Keyword 6-1 Tel: Fax: *

2 3


橡DP9802.PDF

KATO, Hironori ONODA, Keiichi KIMATA, Masaki Becker DeSerpa 7 8 value of saving time Value of Travel Time Saving VTTS 002 Vol.

1) 2) K

12-特集08.indd

02_加藤氏_4.indd

非線形長波モデルと流体粒子法による津波シミュレータの開発 I_ m ρ v p h g a b a 2h b r ab a b Fang W r ab h 5 Wendland 1995 q= r ab /h a d W r ab h

46−ª3�=4�“ƒ‚S“·‚Ö‡¦

論文08.indd

Juntendo Medical Journal

,,,

Core Ethics Vol. Epstein, CI CI CI CI CI CI CI CI Epstein, CI CI CI CI CI CI CI CI CI CI Schindler, CI CI CI CI NIH CI Finn FDA / M CI N CI N / M, CI

心理科学研究 43号=(P)☆/1.竹谷

Psacharopulos Psacharopulos and Patrinos (1) Byron and Takahashi McMahon and Boediono Duflo (2)

推定モデル

本文/YAZ325T


20/September/ (2007) (2007) Berger- ( 2000) Cinii 8 Sociological Abstracts relative deprivation ) *1 (2007) *2 2 4 δ Boudon-Kosaka

2 251 Barrera, 1986; Barrera, e.g., Gottlieb, 1985 Wethington & Kessler 1986 r Cohen & Wills,

戦間期日本企業の資金調達、資本コスト、資本構成:最適資本構成理論からみた1930年代における企業財務

退職互助だより_cs6.indd

明浄創立10周年記念号/6.佐伯

TALC Teaching and Language Corpora Wichmann et al. ; Kettemann & Marko ; Burnard & McEnery ; Aston ; Hunston ; Granger et al. ; Tan ; Sinclair ; Aston

SUSENAS Kor Modul (2) (3) (4)

Ⅰ. 緒言 Suzuki, et al., Ⅱ. 研究方法 1. 対象および方法 1 6 表 1 1, 調査票の内容 図

Transcription:

Preliminary Version. 600 * 14530029 12-1-

Preliminary Version. 1 70 1 1997 9 1020 70 1 3 2 70 1 Manning et al. (1986) Rand Health Insurance Experiment 25 50 Manning et al. (1986) 3 Medicare Medicare Medicare Medigap plan Medigap plan Hurd and McGarry (1997) 1 70 2 3600-2-

Preliminary Version. Yoshida and Takagi (2002) 1 2 (professional norms) 3 2 3-3-

Preliminary Version. Evans (1974) Fuchs (1978 McGuire and Pauly (1991) Evans (1974) Fuchs (1978 4 Gruber and Owings (1996) 10 100 97 Yip (1998) 70 McGuire and Pauly (1991) Farley (1986) Jaegher and Jegers (2000) 4 McGuire (2000) -4-

Preliminary Version. McGuire and Pauly (1991) Farley (1986) Farley (1986) 1 1 10 2 3 4 2 122 8 4 9 8 17-5-

Preliminary Version. 60 65 70 70 69 70 70 70 Yoshida and Takagi (2002) 1 30 28 31 30 Two-part model Two-part model Sample Selection Models 5 5 Sample Selection Models Two-part models Jones -6-

Preliminary Version. 1 Sample Selection Models Two-part model 1 0 Z y hy ( z= 1) y f( y) I( y= 0) [ ] { [ ] } { [ Z ] [ Z ] } h y z f( y) = Pr Z = 0 Pr Z = 1 h( y z = 1) I( y 0) I( y= 0) I( y 0) I( y 0) = Pr = 0 Pr = 1 ( = 1) 2 2 y 70 70 2 random-effects panel probit median regression Median regression 1 median 1 quantile regression Quantile regression median regression Quantile regression Buchinsky (1998) 3 (2000) Mullahy (1998) -7-

Preliminary Version. 119 6 1 3.1 2 1965 16 84 27 8 4 9 8 17 70 70 8.5 0 12.6 9.7 70 10.4 11.0 25 50 75 3.7 7.3 12.1 4.0 7.3 12.6 4.0 7.3 12.4 6-8-

Preliminary Version. 3.3 7.1 13.3 4.6 7.7 12.9 4.3 7.6 13.0 25 50 75 70 70 10 30 8.97 17.89 10.27 8.74 1 70 1117 2217 1014 1013 119-9-

Preliminary Version. 72% 25% 22% 2% 4% 0.1% 1 7 (0, 0.05) (0.05, 0.10) 70 1 2 1 (0, 0.05) 70 (0.05, 0.10) 1 (0, 0.05) 70 70 (0.05, 0.10) 0.10 1 2 1 2 1 3.2 7 STATA 50 bandwidth plug-in STATA bandwidth -10-

Preliminary Version. 3 two-part Probit median regression 1 median median 2 Probit 2 Probit heterogeneity heterogeneity Probit 1 1 0 1 1 8 8 70 Newhouse et all. (1993) Long, Marquis and Rodgers (1998) RAND -11-

Preliminary Version. median regression 70 70 70 70 70 70 70 70 70 70 2 70 70 median median 3 median 70 70-12-

Preliminary Version. 3.3 1 1 1 1 4 70 70 17249 18236 1 719 809 90 70 100 70 100 150 70 100 2000 70 70 70 70 70 1 70 50 2 1 70 70 1 300 600-13-

Preliminary Version. 700 1100 500 700 1100 3.4 2 quantile regression 50% (median) 25% 75% 6 OLS 70 5 50% 70 70-14-

Preliminary Version. 70 381 70 88 163 70 76 138 98 70 70 110 70 10 1 81 70 81 2 25% 75% 54 70 25% 50% 1 75% 1 25% 50% 75% -15-

Preliminary Version. 119 900 119 1100 4 600 Farley (1986) professional norms -16-

Preliminary Version. 1 2 2 2 1 2 Buchinsky, M. (1998): Recent Advances in Quantile Regression Models: A Practical Guideline for Empirical Research, Journal of Human Resources, vol. 33, pp.88-126. Deb, P. and P. K. Trivedi (1997): Demand for Medical Care by the Elderly: A Finite Mixture Approach, Journal of Applied Econometrics, 12, pp.313-326. Hurd, M. D. and K. McGarry (1997): Medical Insurance and the Use of Health Care Services By the Elderly, Journal of Health Economics, 16, pp.129-154. Jones, A. M. (2000): Health Econometrics, Handbook of Health Economics, vol. 1A, eds. Culyer, A. J. and J. P. Newhouse, Elsevier, Amsterdam. Long, S. H., Marquis, M. S. and J. Rodgers (1998): Do People Shift Their Use of Health Services Over Time To Take Advantage Of Insurance?, Journal of Health Economics, 17, pp.105-115. Mullahy, J. (1998): Much ado about two: reconsidering retransformation and the two-part model in health econometrics, Journal of Health Economics, 17, pp.247-281. McGuire, T. G. and M. V. Pauly (1991): Physician Response to Fee Changes with Multiple Payers, Journal of Health Economics, 10, pp.385-410. Newhouse, J. P. et al. (1993): Free for All? Lessons from the RAND Health Insurance Experiment, Harvard Univ. Press, Cambridge, MA. -17-

69 70 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 0.05.1.15.2.25.3.35.4.45.5 69 70.0012.001.0008.0006.0004.0002 0 0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000