: (1) 1. ( ) P ( P ) 2. P () A0 = {a1, a2,..., an} 3a. T1 A0 () A1 3b. T1 A2 (= A1 A0 A1) 4a. T2 A2 ( ) 4b. A1 () 5. : T2 T1 T1 T2 T2 T1 T2 T1 T2 T1 T

Similar documents
...C...{ ren

Stadard Theory:ST( ) Extended Standard Theory:EST( ) Rivised Extended Standard Theory:REST( ) Government and

Eng Ling Worksheet

P

Microsoft Word - もくじ

: : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : :

( ) ( ) Modified on 2009/05/24, 2008/09/17, 15, 12, 11, 10, 09 Created on 2008/07/02 1 1) ( ) ( ) (exgen Excel VBA ) 2)3) 1.1 ( ) ( ) : : (1) ( ) ( )

null element [...] An element which, in some particular description, is posited as existing at a certain point in a structure even though there is no


Modal Phrase MP because but 2 IP Inflection Phrase IP as long as if IP 3 VP Verb Phrase VP while before [ MP MP [ IP IP [ VP VP ]]] [ MP [ IP [ VP ]]]

(3) (1b) ( ( ) ) (1a) (1b) ( 2) (1a) (1b) (mutual exclusion fallacy) (4) : (4) : ( ) ) = (rules) ( de Saussure ) (5) : (5) ( ) (plays) 5) 6) (

fi„‚å-‰³‹ç−w„¤‰ƒ‰IŠv48Ł\1-4.ai

els08ws-kuroda-slides.key

1 ( ) (1) (2) Pattern 1 (P1)// Pattern 2 (P2) (V1 = V2) (alternation) (SPRAY-PAINT alternation/ hypallage) (1) (2) P1: (Z ) X Y V1 P2: (Z ) X Y

Corrected Version NICT /11/15, 1 Thursday, May 7,

九州大学学術情報リポジトリ Kyushu University Institutional Repository 日本語の sluicing 文に関する統語分析 前田, 雅子九州大学人文科学府 松本, 知子九州大学人文科学府 Maeda, Masako Graduate School of Huma

助詞「に」の定量的分析の試み

( ) ( ) (action chain) (Langacker 1991) ( 1993: 46) (x y ) x y LCS (2) [x ACT-ON y] CAUSE [BECOME [y BE BROKEN]] (1999: 215) (1) (1) (3) a. * b. * (4)

June 30, 2007

Tajfel Turner /1995) Tajfel 1981 p Turner 1987 in-group out-group /

JCSS2003 Program

word S V O


untitled

九州大学学術情報リポジトリ Kyushu University Institutional Repository 英語の二重目的語構文および前置詞与格構文について : ミニマリストアプローチ 大塚, 知昇九州大学人文科学府 Otsuka, Tomonori Graduate School of Hu

Lees (1964), Stockwell, et al. (1973), Akmajian and Henry (1975), Jacobson (1977), Ukaji (1978), etc. Downes (1977), Akmajian, Steele, and Wasow (1979

1 (p)l A TEX L A TEX ( Stanford CSLI Emma Pease 15 LATEX 2 lingmacros.sty gb4e.sty TeX Live \docu

On the Relation between the Deictic Use and the Non-deictic Use of the Japanese Demonstratives SATOSHI KINSUI* This paper addresses the status of deix

TALC Teaching and Language Corpora Wichmann et al. ; Kettemann & Marko ; Burnard & McEnery ; Aston ; Hunston ; Granger et al. ; Tan ; Sinclair ; Aston

1 (1) (2a) (2b) (2) a. [ame ga [fur anakatta] ] b. [ [ame ga fur] anakatta] (2a) (2b) 1.1 (3) (4a) (4b) (3) (4) a. [ [ ] ] b. [ [ ] ] (4a) (4b) 3 (5)


本文2/YA1307Z

/™Z‚å‰IŠv‚æ36“ƒ /fi¡„´“NŠm†€

E-2 省略現象から見た日本語動名詞句の内部構造 内芝慎也 0. はじめに (1) a. [ 太郎との相席 ] は難しいが [ 次郎との ] は問題ない b. 花子は [ 太郎との相席 ] を断り 順子は [ 次郎との ] を断った c. * 順子は [ 太郎との相席 ] をし 花子は [ 次郎との

( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) [1]

橡学術用語集;鄭、金水、高宮、岡崎.PDF

9_89.pdf

On the Double Object Construction*

NE25.indb

Microsoft PowerPoint SemanticAnalysis.ppt

音楽とOR(片寄)

卒論 提出用ファイル.doc

PowerPoint プレゼンテーション

2012_00表紙

untitled

Grice (1957) S x p S A x 1. A p 2. A S 1 3. A S 1 p (intention-based semantics) S p x (Strawson 1964; Grice 1969; Schiffer 1972; Harman 1974; Bennett

nlp1-05.key


NINJAL Research Papers No.13

07 mokuroku final.indd

09_06.indd

Saussure ( ) Glossematics function a presupposes b dependence Hjelmslev ( ) ( ) a. interdependence substance form b. determination sine c. constellati

1. interlanguage 1970 (phonology) morphology syntax Hymes 1972 (communicative competence) Interlanguage Pragmatics Blum- Kulka, House, & Kasper, 1989

03山本雅子.indd

,,.,... a. Mark gave a book to Jane. b. Mark gave Jane a book.,.,,.,,.,, (act-out task).,,. a. The cow showed the dog to the horse. b. The cow showed


1

18 11/19/2000 ON VERBAL INFLECTION IN JAPANESE Hiroshi Aoyagi Nanzan University 1. Introduction: Where s inflectional morphol

数理言語

白井学習法(1).ppt

課程博士学位申請論文


慶應


6 68

慶應

36 Theoretical and Applied Linguistics at Kobe Shoin No. 20, 2017 : Key Words: syntactic compound verbs, lexical compound verbs, aspectual compound ve

philology : philology linguistics : a. langue b. c. d. a. langue competence b. parole performance 1

5temp+.indd

Thomas Kuhn markedness McCawley (1985)

Cognitive Studies, 22(1), (March 2015) Conversational interactions contribute not only to the sharing of information and establishment of cons

4 小川/小川

148_hayatsu.indd

慶應

コーパスからの構文頻度の抽出と辞書への活用 : 現状と課題 大羽良 1. はじめに 2. 構文とは 2.1. Goldberg (1995, p1) Particular semantic structures together with their associated formal expres

158 citation form c. N T Archangeli Underspecification T Underspecification Contrastive Underspecification Radical Underspecification T Underspecifica

1) A Consideration of the Use of the Phrase Tsumaranaimonodesuga by Comparison of the Contents of Japanese Textbooks and the Results of Actual Surveys

2014年度の研究報告

untitled

g. *The fence hits easily. Levin : ff break e fg bc d a. Tony broke the window (with a hammer). b. #Tony broke the hammer against the window. c. *Tony

<8A4F8D918CEA B B82E082AD82B62E696E6464>

複合動詞の研究文献 v.2

IPSJ-shinmori final.dvi

疑問詞と「か」と「も」Handout(Final)

[2010]nanzan-paper1.01

現代日本語の有情物主語の受身文

‰gficŒõ/’ÓŠ¹

2 2.1 NPCMJ ( (Santorini, 2010) (NPCMJ, 2016) (1) (, 2016) (1) (2) (1) ( (IP-MAT (CONJ ) (PP (NP (D ) (N )) (P )) (NP-SBJ *

NE25.indb



IPSJ SIG Technical Report Vol.2011-MUS-91 No /7/ , 3 1 Design and Implementation on a System for Learning Songs by Presenting Musical St

高橋論文.indd

p.14 p.14 p.17 1 p レッテル貼り文 2015: PC 20 p : PC 4

概要 CKY Parser(Section 9.1.2) の改良 事前にもつ知識の活用 実際のアプリケーションへの応用

04-04 第 57 回土木計画学研究発表会 講演集 vs


33 (2016), 105 Abstract Keywords CAP Vol. 9 ( ) pp : : : :

untitled

1,2 3 I like *me / myself. You like *you / yourself. He likes him / himself. He thinks [ that he / *himself is intelligent ]. He thinks [ that Mary li

Transcription:

Syntax for Dummies () ( ) 2004 10 16 1 ( ) ( )???! 1.1 1.1.1 Lakoff, Langacker, Fauconnier : 1)? JARO 1.1.2 (i) (ii) (ii) (i) 1) [3, 12] 1

: (1) 1. ( ) P ( P ) 2. P () A0 = {a1, a2,..., an} 3a. T1 A0 () A1 3b. T1 A2 (= A1 A0 A1) 4a. T2 A2 ( ) 4b. A1 () 5. : T2 T1 T1 T2 T2 T1 T2 T1 T2 T1 T2 A2 T1 irrelevant A2 1.1.3 2) (image schemas) X NP, VP 3) (arguments) (adjuncts) 1.2 () [1, 5, 6, 11, 14] [1, 5, 11, 14] ( ) 1.2.1 3) NP, VP N, V 2) N, V 2

() (NP) (PP) NP 4) NP PP 1.2.2 1.2.3 4) [9] NP?? : 1.2.4? 3

2 2.1 2.2 2.1 2.1.1?:? : (2) (syntactic phenomenon)?: (theory of syntax) X (3) (syntactic structure)?: X (4) (theory of syntax/ syntactic theory)?: X () M (e.g., [1, 14]) (4) (3) (2) 5) : (5) a. (2) (3) b. (3) (4) 5) [11] (2) (5) (3) (4) (2) (3) (4) (Universal Grammar) 2.1.2 : (6) X X X X X X 2.2 1 (7) a. b. c. {,,... } {,,,... } {,,,,,... } 4

2.2.1 (words) {,,,,,... } (morphemes) 6) {,,... } {,,,,... } ( ) (phrases) (7) (8) 7) (8) a. {,, } = {a 1, a 2, a 3 } b. {,,,,, } = {a 1, b 1, b 2, b 3, a 2, a 3 } c. {,,,,,,, } = {a 1, b 1, b 2, b 3, c 1, c 2, a 2, a 3 } = (segment(ation)) 2.2.2 (8) (9) a. {,, } b. {,, } c. {,,,, } 2.4 2.2.3 : (7) (8) (construct) 6) [10] 7) (8) (8b) (7b) (10) a. [=(7b)] = a 1 b 1 b 2 b 3 a 2 a 3 b. = a 1 b 2 b 1 b 3 a 2 a 3 c. * = a 1 b 3 b 2 b 1 a 2 a 3 d. * e.... = a 1 b 3 b 2 b 1 a 2 a 3 X (e.g., ) (e.g., ) (acceptable) 8) (*) *X (10c, d) (ungrammatical) 9) 10) (11) a. b. (locality) (12) 8) ( ) X / X (accept) / / 9) X ( ) () G X (= ) / 10) ( ) ( ) 5

(13)? a 1, b 1, c 1 2 () 2.3 : (8) (syntactic analysis) 2.3.1 Hockett (7b) 1 L[0] (8b) L[6]: L[5]: L[4]: L[3]: L[1]: L 0]: M 2]: M 1]: M 0]: 1 Hockett 1 Charles Hockett Hockett (Hockett s box) (Hockett ) ((Hockett s) box representation) 11) M[0]... L[6] M[i] (i = 0, 1, 2) (morphology) (word formation) L[i] (i = 0, 1,..., 6) ( ) (syntax)) 12) 2.3.2 () 1 L[i] 2 2 () ((immediate) constituent analysis) 11) 12) [8] (ultimate constituents) = (terminals) 2.3.3 (8) (bracketing) (14) (15) (14) a. [ X1 [ a1 ] [ X2 [ a2 ] [ a3 ]]] b. [ X1 [ a1 ] [ X2 [ X3 [ X4 [ b1 ] [ b2 ] [ b3 ]] [ a3 ]] [ a3 ]] c. [ X1 [ a1 ] [ X2 [ X3 [ X4 [ b1 ] [ b2 ] [ b3 ]] [ X5 [ X6 [ c1 ] [ c2 ]] [ a3 ]]] [ a3 ]] (15) a. [[] [[] []]] b. [[] [[[[] [ ] []] []] []] c. [[] [[[[] [ ] []] [[[ ] [ ]] []]] []] (14) { X 1,..., a 1,..., b 1,... } 2.4 2.3.4 () 2 ( ) (16) a.? b.? ( ) 13) 13) [11] 6

1 Hockett 2 : Hockett Hockett 14) ( ) : (17) : ( ) Hockett 2.5 2.3.5 2 3 [ ] [[][ ]] [[ ][ ]] [[ ][ ]] [[ ][ ]] (7b) Hockett Hockett 2.3.6 : (18) 3 ( ) (bottomup) (topdown) (19) (14, 15) 3 1, 2 (14) [ ] [[ ] ] 2.5 (16a) (greedy constituency analysis) (7b) 3 [[ ][ ][ ][ ][ ][ ][ ][ ][ ][ ][ ][ ][ ][][ ]] 1 M[0] 14) Hockett (i) (ii) x 1... y... x 2 x 1... y y... x 2 (synchronize) x 1... x 2 x 1... x 2 (19) () : (20) 7

2.3.7 ( ) (word formation) = (morphology) (21) a. b. 15) (22) a. b. [ ] [] [] [ ] [] [] [ ] [] [] [ ] [] [] [] [ ] [] [] [] [ ] (21a) ([-gumi-]) (21b) [-kumi-in] [] ( 1) [] ( 2) 1 2 (23) 2.3.9 : (24)???? 2.5 (labeling) 2.5 2.4 5 2.4.4 VP (=S0) V' NP VP (=S1) VP (=S2) 4 NP: NP: AP: V: NP: V: 5 () 4 (morphological analysis) ( ) 2.3.8 15) X (... X X... ) (21b) (22b) (21a) (22a) X : Y (e.g., NP:) Y (e.g., ) X (e.g., NP) ( ) (14b) L = { X 1,..., a 1,... } : (25) a. X 1, X 3, X 4 VP (= S ) b. X 2, b 1, a 3 NP c. b 2 AP 8

d. b 3, a 3 V 5 (26b) : (26) a. [ VP(=S0) [ NP ] [ V [ NP ] [ V ]]] b. [ VP(=S0) [ NP ] [ V [ NP [ VP(=S1) [ NP ] [ VP(=S2) ]] [ NP ]] [ V ]]] [ NP [ VP ][ NP ( )]] [ NP ( )] [ VP ] (modifier) [ NP ] [ VP ] (adjunction) (adjuncts) (adjoin) X Y X Y X :?? 2.4.1 () (9) : A. (Verb: V) ( ) (Subject) {,, } ( ) (Object) B. (9) (grammatical functions) (grammatical roles) GF GR (27) GF = GR = { (subject), () ((direct) object), (indirect object), (modifier),... } GF (8), (9) (28) a. A = {{: Subject}, {: Object}, {: Predicate}} b. B = {{: Subject}, {: Object}, {: Predicate}} c. C = {{: Subject}, { : Object}, {: Predicate}} (29) a. B = {{:??}, { :??}, { :??}} b. C = {{:??}, {:??}, { : Modifier}, {: Object Predicate?}} (30) 2.4.2 Verb (predicate) (argument) (realization) {Arg1, Arg2,... } Arg1 = (Subject), Arg2 = (Object),... 16) : (31) (32) (configuration) () Lexical-Functional Grammar [1] 2.4.3? (part of speech) ((syntactic) categories) () (syntactic (segmentational) units) (terminals) 16) Arg2 ( ) (accusative) I got off the bus { I: ARG1, GOT: PRED, MYSELF: ARG2, OFF THE BUS: ARG3} 9

= (nodes) X = XP (X Phrase) (head) X X (33) { Noun (N), Verb (V), Pre/Postpositional (P), Adjective (A), Advberb (Adv), Complementizer (C)} 17) 6 XP = X'' X' Specifier(X) X Complement(X) SVO () X XP = X'' X' (34) a. NP (Noun Phrase; ) N () b. VP (Verb Phrase; ) V () c. PP (Prepositional/ Postpositional Phrase; / ) P (/ ) d. AP (Adjective Phrase; ) A () e. AdvP (Adverb Phrase; ) Adv () f. CP (Complementizer Phrase; ) C (, e.g., that) 2.4.4 X XP X X XP = X ( X) X (projection) X ( X) (complement) X (specifier) XP = X X (maximal projection) XP 6, 7 2.4.5 () 6, 7 (phrase structure) 18) 17) X {Modal (M), Neg, Inflection (I), Tense (T), Determiner (D),... } () MP, NegP, IP, TP, DP,... ( ) [2] 2.5 9 18) (rewrite rules): X Y Z ( ) X (Phrase) 7 Specifier(X) Complement(X) SOV () X (constituency structure) : (35) () 2.4.6 X X = V = Predicate[n] {Arg1} {Arg2, Arg3,..., Argn} (external argument) (internal arguments) Arg1 2.4.7 X (arguments) (adjuncts) (specfier) (complements) 19) (modifiers) (26b) (26a) [ VP(=S0) [ NP ] [ V [ NP ] [ V ]]] 19) X 10

(26b) [ VP(=S0) [ NP ] [ V [ NP [ VP(=S1) [ NP ] [ VP(=S2) ]] [ NP ]] [ V ]]] 2.4.8 X X SVO, SOV O, V VSO {S, {O, V}} VSO (Arabic, Celtic), OSV 20) 2.4.9 (28) (36) a. A = {{: Subject: NP}, { { : Object: NP }, { : Predicate[2]: V}}: Predicate[1]: V } b. B = {{: Subject: NP}, { { : Object: NP }, { : Predicate[2]: V } }: Predicate[1]: V } : (37) (36) X Predicate[2], Predicate[1], Predicate[0] Predicate[n] n Predicate[0] = VP = S ( ) 2.4.10 VP V, S V (= VP) (36) 8 : Predicate[0]: VP = S : Predicate[1]: V : Arg1 : Arg2 : Predicate[2]: V 8 VP := V S ( ) := VP 21) S := VP Generalized Phrase Structure 20) () ((syntactic) transformation) 21) [11] Grammar (GPSG) [4] Head-driven Phrase Structure Grammar (HPSG) [13] IP TP S DP, TP, IP,... HPSG, LFG DP, TP, IP,... () ((syntactic) derivation) 2.5 RP XP (VP) V (= V ) S V (= V ) / 2.5.1 /? X (38) a. Specifier ( )? b. Specifier ( )? VP PP X / SPEC X [7] / SPEC / /? [15] / NP NP? 11

S=V'' P'' V' NP P' V' S=V''=U'' NP P' P'' V'=U' NP P'' V'=U' A'' V" P'' P' V=U' V'=v' P' P' A' V=P' U=v' P' V=v' NP: P: NP: P: V?: A: P: V: P: U: v: NP: P: V: v: 9 XP Network Analysis 2.5.2 XP 2.3.4 (16a) (16b) 9 XP (XP Network Analysis) P, A [NP: ] [P: ], [V: ], [A: ], [P: ], [P : () ], [U: ( ) ], [P: ], [V: ] [NP: ] {N, {P, V, U, v}} (= {N, R}) R = {P, U, V, v} (39) [ R NP [ R Complement R ]] N P V U v {N, {P, V, U, v}} : N N, N = NP X NP-Specifier, NPcomplement P P, P X PP-Specifier NP, PPcomplement NP V V, V = S X VP-Specifier NP, VPcomplement (PP, AP, NP) U ( ) (auxiliary) V U, U = S X UP-Specifier NP, UPcomplement V v (inflection) P v = V, v = V X vp-specifier NP, vp-complement (stem) 22) 22) v, v, v (=vp) 2.5.3 9 2.3.6 () 2 () ((syntactic) transformations) (e.g., [[][ ]], [[ ]... [ ]], [[ ]... []]) 9 XP 1: 2: PP-Spec : / (PP-Specifier) NP PRO (gap) : [ ] = (gap) g 1 2 2 (40) (41a, b, c) ( ) (missing units) (40) [[][][ ][][]] (41) a. [[ ][ ][ ][ ][ ][]] b. [[ ][ ][ ][ ][ ][]] c. [[ ][ ][ ][ ][ ][]] (Minimalist Pogram) [2] (light verb) 12

(42) a.?*[[][][ ][ ][ ][]] b. *[[][][ ][][ ][]] 9 (i) (40) (41a, b, c) ( ) (ii) (42a, b) 2.6 (41b) kkuroda/ papers/ CogMorphFinalOriginal.pdf] [9] Kuroda, Sige-Yuki. 1979. Generative Grammatical Studies in the Japanese Language. Garland. [Facsimilie of 1965 MIT Dissertation.] [10] Matthews, P. H. 1991. Morphology. Cambridge University Press. [11] McCawley, James D. 2001. Syntactic Phenomena of English, 2nd Edition. University of Chicago Press. [12]. 1999.?:.. [13] Sag, Ivan, and Carl J. Pollard. 1996. Head-driven Phrase Structure Grammar. CLSI Publications. [14] Sag, Ivan, Thomas Wasow, and Emily E. Bendler. 2003. Syntactic Theory: A Formal Introduction. University of Chicago Press. [: : (, ). ( ). ( Bendler )] [15] Stowell, Timothy. 1985. Origins of Phrase Structure. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation. MIT. 3??? [1] Bresnan, Joan. 2000. Lexical-Functional Syntax. Blackwell. [2] Chomsky, Noam. 1995. The Minimalist Program. MIT Press. [3]. 2001. :. :. [4] Gazdar, Gerald, Geoffrey Pullum, Evan Klein, and Ivan Sag. 1985. Generalized Phrase Structure Grammar. Blackwell. [5] Green, Georgia, and Jerry Morgan. 1996. A Practical Guide to Syntactic Analysis. University of Chicago Press. [6]. 2002... [7] Jackendoff, Ray S. 1977. X Syntax: A Study of Phrase Structure. MIT Press. [8]. 2003. [ () [http:clsl.hi.h.kyoto-u.ac.jp/ 13