G7諸国における非貿易財相対価格の分析
|
|
- きみかず たみや
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 G7 * kawai@iss.u-tokyo.jp ** munehisa.kasuya@boj.or.jp *** naohisa.hirakata@boj.or.jp No.03-J * ** ***
2 G G7 Key words : real exchange rate, relative price of nontradable goods, sectoral productivity dierential, Balassa-Samuelson hypothesis JEL classication : E31, F41 1 (purchasing power parity, PPP)
3 15 OECD G
4 4 3 G OECD GDP GDP 1 (GDP ) 1 1 OECD GDP GDP 1 OECD Balassa-Samuelson 2 1 GDP OECD G7 GDP G7 OECD G7 OECD G7 GDP G7 OECD G7 OECD Balassa-Samuelson GDP G7 OECD 1 OECD 2 Balassa-Samuelson Balassa-Samuelson Bergstrand(1991) G7 Balassa-Samuelson Ito (1997), Kawai and Ohara (1997), Ito et al. (1999), Motonishi (2002) 3
5 G7 q GDP q = s + p, p; (1) s :, p; p : GDP ( ). 30 G7 GDP p = (1, )p T + p N ; p = (1, )p T + p N ;, GDP 3 q =(s + p T, p T ), (p N, p T )+ (p N, p T ): (2) (q) (s + p T, p T ) (p N, p T ) () (p N, p T ) G7 (s + p T, p T )() 1970 =0( 1970=1) 30 4
6 G7 (p N, p T )( ) G7 (a T, a N )() 1970=0( 1970=1) (TFP) TFP TFP 4 Balassa-Samuelson G7 () () Balassa-Samuelson 6 G7 G7 3 A Canzoneri, Cumby and Diba (1999) 4 TFP OECD Inter Sectoral Data Base (ISDB) ISDB 5 Balassa-Samuelson 5
7 3 2 2 Froot and Rogo(1991) Rogo(1992) Obstfeld and Rogo (1996) 3.1 1X t=0 d t (p Tt c Tt + p Nt c Nt )= max fc Tt ;c Nt g 1 t=0 1X t=0 1X t=0 t u(c Tt ;c Nt ); (3) d t [p Tt Q T + p Nt (Q N, G Nt )] + B 0 W 0 ; (4) Q Tt = A Tt F T (L Tt ; KT ) (5) Q Nt = A Nt G N (L Nt ; KN ) (6) L = L Tt + L Nt ; (7) c Tt ;c Nt : t, : 1=(1 + ),, p Tt ;p Nt : T ), N), 6
8 d t : 1=(1 + r) t ; r, Q Tt ;Q Nt :,, G Nt :, W 0 ;B 0 :, A Tt ;A Nt :,. () (lump sum tax) solvency condition 0 u(c T ;c N )=c T T c N N ; (8) t Z t p Tt c Tt + p Nt c Nt Z t =(1, ) t d t W 0 ; (9) t c Tt = T Z t =p T ; (10) c Nt = N Z t =p N : (11) p Nt p Tt = Nc Tt T c Nt = A TtF T L T A Nt F N L N (12) A Tt F T L T A Nt G N L N 7
9 (12) Helpman and Razin(1982) t Q Tt + Q Tt = c Tt + c Tt ; (13) Q Nt, G Nt = c Nt ; (14) Q Nt, G Nt = c Nt; (15) W 0 (9) (10) (11) (13) (14) t p Nt p Tt = Q Tt + Q Tt Q Nt, G Nt N Z t T Z t + ; (16) T Z t = Q Tt + Q Tt N (1, ) t W 0 Q Nt, G Nt T (1, ) t W 0 + T (1, ) t W : (17) 0 t Y t Y t p Tt Q Tt + p Nt (Q Nt, G Nt ): (18) W 0 W 0 W 0 W 0 1X 1X t=0 t=0 8 d t Y t + B 0 ; (19) d t Y t, B 0 : (20)
10 (18) (19) (20) (17) p Nt p Tt = Q Tt + Q Tt Q Nt, G Nt N (1, ) t ( P 1 t=0 d t Y t + B 0 ) T (1, ) t ( P 1 t=0 d t Y t + B 0 )+ T (1, ) t ( P 1 t=0 d t Y t, B 0 ) : (21) B Nt =p Tt 0 = N(1, ) t [ T (1, ) t W 0 + T (1, ) t W 0 ] [ T (1, ) t W 0 + T (1, ) t W 0 ] 2 > 0: (22) () 6 t 7 (17) W 0 W Balassa-Samuelson 6 () 7 Rogo (1992) 9
11 Balassa-Samuelson Balassa-Samuelson (2) GDP (2) q s + p T, p T p N, p T, p N, p T ( 1) G7 ( 3) 9 8 Engel and Rogers (1996) Canzoneri et al. (1999) Engel (1999) 9 10
12 Pedroni(1999) G7 (heterogeneous panel cointegration) 10 ( 2) G7 ( 4) 11 Balassa-Samuelson 5 5.(1) p N,p T a T, a N 2 5.(2) GDP g, y 5.(3) GDP cca () GDP fdi Chiang and Kao (2001) Coppel and Durand (1999) Lane et al. (2001) 11
13 ( 6) 6.(1) 6.(2) 4.2 Balassa-Samuelson (autoregressive distributed lag, ADL) 13 ADL 14 G ,1 <<0 G7, ADL yt = + b(l)y t + c(l)x t + t ADL Hendry, Pagan and Sagan (1984) 14 Pesaran, Shin and Smith(1999) 15 B 12
14 8 G7 8 G7 9 G ,1 <<0 G7 8 10,1 << G
15 ( ) ( ) G7 Balassa-Samuelson
16 30 ( 4 ) ( ) 2 G7 15
17 A OECD Inter Sectoral Data Base (ISDB) Canzoneri, Cumby and Diba(1999) GDP TFP ISDB ISDB ISDB 1997 OECD STAN 1999 IMF International Financial Statistics (IFS) GDP GDP GDP IFS GDP B Pooled Mean Group Estimator Pesaran, Shin and Smith(1999) (pooled mean group estimator, PMGE) 2 MG) PMG) intermediate estimator 16
18 T N Pesaran and Smith (1995) T GMM 19 ADL(p;q;q;:::;q) y it = px j=1 ij y i;t,j + X p,1 y it = i y i;t,1 + ix 0 it + j=1 qx j=0 0 ij x i;t,j + i + it (23) X q,1 ijy i;t,j + j=0 0 ij x i;t,j + + it (24) i =,(1, i = px j=0 ij =, ij =, px j=1 ij ); (25) ij ; (26) px qx m=j+1 m=j+1 im ;j =1; 2;:::;p, 1; (27) im ;j =1; 2;:::;q, 1: (28) P p j=1 ij < 1 i < 0 y it =,( 0 i = i)x it + it (29) i, 0 i = i PMGE = i ;i=1; 2;:::;N: (30) i 19 17
19 [1] Bergstrand, Jerey H. (1991) \Structural Determination of Real Exchange Rates and National Price Levels: Some Empirical Evidence," American Economic Review, Vol. 81(1), pp [2] Canzoneri, Matthew B., Robert E. Cumby and Behzad Diba (1999) \Relative Labor Productivity and the Real Exchange Rate in the Long Run: Evidence for a Panel of OECD Countries," Journal of International Economics, Vol. 47, pp [3] Chiang, Min-Hsien and Kao, Shihwa (2002) \Nonstationary Panel Time Series Using NPT A User Guide," Center for Policy Research, Syracuse University. [4] Coppel, Jonathan and Martine Durand (1999) \Trends in Market Openness," Economics Department Working Paper No. 221, OECD. [5] Engel, Charles (1999) \Accounting for U.S. Real Exchange Rate Changes," Journal of Political Economy, Vol. 107 (3), pp [6] Engel, Charles and Jenkins J. Rogers (1996) \How Wide is the Border?" American Economic Review, Vol. 86, pp [7] Froot, Kenneth and Kenneth Rogo (1991) \The EMS, the EMU, and the Transition to Common Currency," in O. Blanchard and S. Fischer, eds., NBER Macroeconomics Annual. [8] Hadri, K. (2000) \Testing for Stationary in Heterogeneous Panel Data," Econometrics Journal, Vol.3 (2), pp [9] Helpman, Elhanan and Assaf Razin (1982) \Dynamics of a Floating Exchange Rate Regime," Journal of Political Economy, Vol. 90 (4), pp [10] Hendry, David F., Pagan, A. R. and Sagan, J. D. (1984) \Dynamic Specication," in Griliches, Z and Intriligator, M. D. Handbook of Econometrics, Vol. 2-3, Amsterdam: North-Holland, 18
20 reprinted in Hendry D. F. (1993) Econometrics: Alchemy or Science? oxford: Blackwell Publishers. [11] Ito, Takatoshi(1997) \The long-run Purchasing Power Parity for the Yen: Historical Overview," Journal of the Japanese & International Economics, Vol.11 (4), pp [12] Ito, Takatoshi, Pter Isard, and Steven Symansky (1999) \Economic Growth and Real Exchange Rate: An Overview of the Balassa-Samuelson Hypothesis in Asia," in Ito, Takatoshi Krueger, Anne O., eds.,changes in Exchange Rates in Rapidly Developing Countries: Theory, Practice, and Policy Issues, NBER-East Asia Seminar on Economics, Vol. 7, Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press, pp [13] Kawai, Masahiro, and Hidetaka Ohara (1997) \Nonstationarity of Real Exchange Rates in the G7 Countries: Are They Cointegrated with Real Variables?" Journal of the Japanese & International Economies, Vol. 11 (4), pp [14] Lane, Philip R. and Gian Maria Milesi-Ferretti (2001) \The External Wealth of Nations: Measures of Foreign Assets and Liabilities for Industrial and Developing Countries," Journal of International Economics, Vol. 55, pp [15] Motonishi, Taizo (2002) \Modications of the Balassa-Samuelson Model: The Eects of Balanced Growth and Capital Accumulation," Journal of the Japanese & International Economies, Vol. 16 (1). pp [16] Obstfeld, Maurice and Kenneth Rogo (1996), Foundations of International Macroeconomics, Cambridge, MA: MIT press. [17] Pantula, Sastry G., Graciela Gonzalez-Farias and Wayne A. Fuller (1994) \A Comparison of Unit-Root Test Criteria," Journal of Business and Economic Statistics,Vol. 12(4), pp
21 [18] Pedroni, Peter (1999) \Critical Values for Cointegration Tests in Heterogeneous Panels with Multiple Regressors," Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, Vol. 61, pp [19] Pesaran, Hashem M. and Ron P. Smith (1995) \Estimating Long-Run Relationships from Dynamic Heterogeneous Panels," Journal of Econometrics, Vol. 68, pp [20] Pesaran, Hashem M., Yongcheol Shin and Ron P. Smith (1999) \Pooled Mean Group Estimation of Dynamic Heterogeneous Panels," Journal of the American Statistical Association, Vol. 94, pp [21] Rogo, Kenneth (1992) \ Traded Goods Consumption Smoothing and the Random Walk Behavior of the Real Exchange Rate," Bank of Japan Monetary and Economic Studies, Vol. 10 (2), pp [22] Rogo, Kenneth (1996) \The Purchasing Power Parity Puzzle," Journal of Economic Literature, Vol. 34 (2), pp
22 1: s + p, p s + p T, p T p N, p T a T, a N g, y cca fdi ADF ** PP Z ADF PP Z ADF * PP Z ADF PP Z ADF * PP Z ADF ** PP Z ADF * PP Z : 1. ***,**,* 1%, 5% and 10%. 2. ADF: Augmented, PPZ: (z). 3. s + p, p : (). 4. s + p, T p : (). T 5. p N, p T : (). 6. a T, a N : (). 7. g, y : GDP (). 8. cca : GDP. 9. fdi : () GDP (). 10., (1994) AIC., j AIC, j
23 : 2:,, s + p, p s + p T, pt pn, pt p N, p T s + p, p s + p T, pt pn, pt p N, p T s + p, p s + p T, pt pn, pt p N, p T s + p, p s + p T, pt pn, pt p N, p T s + p, p s + p T, pt pn, pt p N, p T s + p, p s + p T pn, pt p N, p T * 3 1. ***,**,* 1%, 5% and 10%. 2. s + p, p : (). 3. s + p T, p T : (). 4. p N, P T : (). 5. p, N p T : (). 6., (1994) AIC.. 22
24 3: s + p, p s + p T, p T pn, pt at, an g, y cca fdi ( 0.000) ( 0.000) ( 0.000) ( 0.000) ( 0.000) ( 0.000) ( 0.000) ( 0.000) ( 0.000) ( 0.000) ( 0.000) ( 0.000) ( 0.000) ( 0.000) : 1. (2000). 2. p. 3. s + p, p : ( ). 4. s + p T, p T : (). 5. p N, p T : (). 6. a T, a N : (shizenn ). 7. g, y : GDP (). 8. cca : GDP. 9. fdi : () GDP (). 23
25 4:,, ( 0.121) ( 0.242) 3. t (- ) ( 0.358) 4. t ( ) ( 0.000) ( 0.015) 6. t (- ) ( 0.273) 7. t ( ) ( 0.356) : 1..,. 2. (1999) , i i =, H 0 : i = =1( i), H 1 : i = <1( i),. i ,., i =, H 0 : i =1( i), H 1 : i = <1( i),. 5. p-. 24
26 5: (1) :. (2) :,. (3) :,,,. (1) (2) (3) pn, pt pn, pt pn, pt at, an at, an at, an g, y g, y cca fdi pn, pt pn, pt pn, pt at, an at, an at, an g, y g, y cca fdi pn, pt pn, pt pn, pt at, an at, an at, an g, y g, y cca fdi pn, pt pn, pt pn, pt at, an at, an at, an g, y g, y cca fdi
27 (1) (2) 5: () (3) pn, pt pn, pt pn, pt at, an at, an at, an g, y g, y cca fdi pn, pt ** 11 pn, pt pn, pt at, an at, an at, an g, y g, y cca fdi pn, pt pn, pt pn, pt at, an ** 11 at, an at, an g, y g, y cca fdi : 1. ***,**,* 1%, 5% and 10%. 2. ADF: Augmented, PPZ: (z). 3. s + p, p : (). 4. s + p, T p T : (). 5. p N, p T : (). 6. a T, a N : (). 7. g, y GDP (). 8. cca : GDP. 9. fdi : () GDP (). 10., (1994) AIC
28 : 6: (1), ( 0.020) ( 0.000) 3. t (- ) ( 0.000) 4. t ( ) ( 0.000) ( 0.000) 6. t (- ) ( 0.000) 7. t ( ) ( 0.000) (2),,, ( 0.019) ( 0.004) 3. t (- ) ( 0.004) 4. t ( ) ( 0.000) ( 0.000) 6. t (- ) ( 0.000) 7. t ( ) ( 0.000) 1..,. 2. (1999) p-. 27
29 7: ADL : t- P- C (p N, p T ) t, (p N, p T ) t, (p N, p T ) t, (p N, p T ) t, (a, T a N ) t (a, T a N ) t, (a, T a N ) t, (a, T a N ) t, (g, y) t (g, y) t, (g, y) t, (g, y) t, AR(1)-AR(4):LM P R 2 Adj-R t- P- C (p N, p T ) t, (a T, a N ) t (g, y) t AR(1)-AR(4):LM P R 2 Adj-R S.E. t- P- C (p N, p T ) t, (p N, p T ) t, (p N, p T ) t, (p N, p T ) t, (a T, a N ) t (a T, a N ) t, (a T, a N ) t, (a T, a N ) t, (g, y) t (g, y) t, AR(1)-AR(4):LM P R 2 Adj-R
30 7: () t- P- C (p N, p T ) t, (a T, a N ) t (g, y) t AR(1)-AR(4):LM P R 2 Adj-R t- P- C (p N, p T ) t, (p N, p T ) t, (a T, p N ) t (a T, p N ) t, (a T, p N ) t, (g, y) t (g, y) t, (g, y) t, (g, y) t, AR(1)-AR(4):LM P R 2 Adj-R t- P- C (p N, p T ) t, (p N, p T ) t, (a T, a N ) t (a T, a N ) t, (a T, a N ) t, (g, y) t AR(1)-AR(4):LM P R 2 Adj-R
31 7: () t- P- C (p N, p T ) t, (p N, p T ) t, (p N, p T ) t, (p N, p T ) t, (a T, a N ) t (a T, a N ) t, (a T, a N ) t, (a T, a N ) t, (g, y) t (g, y) t, (g, y) t, (g, y) t, AR(1)-AR(4):LM P R 2 Adj-R : 1. : ADL(). 2. AR(1)-AR(4):LM : Breusch-Godfrey. 3. : (p N, p T ): 4. : (a T, a N ), GDP (g, y). 30
32 : 8: 7 () a T, a N g, y (0.090) (0.037) (0.365) (0.108) (0.476) (0.157) (0.253) (0.238) (0.303) (0.060) (0.180) (0.325) (0.075) (0.091) (0.496) (0.232) (0.024) (0.146) (0.148) (1.400) (42.321) LR H 0 : p- 2 (6) = (0.000) : PMGE ( ). 3. : (p N, p T ). 4. : (a T, a N ), GDP (g, y). 31
33 9: ADL : t- P- C (p N, p T ) t, (p N, p T ) t, (p N, p T ) t, (a T, a N ) t (a T, a N ) t, (a T, a N ) t, (a T, a N ) t, (g, y) t cca t fdi t AR(1)-AR(4):LM P R 2 Adj-R t- P- C (p N, p T ) t, (p N, p T ) t, (a T, a N ) t (a T, a N ) t, (a T, a N ) t, (g, y) t cca t fdi t AR(1)-AR(4):LM P R 2 Adj-R
34 9: () t- P- C (p N, p T ) t, (p N, p T ) t, (p N, p T ) t, (a T, a N ) t (g, y) t (g, y) t, (g, y) t, cca t cca t, cca t, cca t, fdi t AR(1)-AR(4):LM P R 2 Adj, R t- P- C (p N, p N ) t, (a T, a N ) t (a T, a N ) t, (g, y) t (g, y) t, cca t cca t, fdi t fdi t, AR(1)-AR(4):LM P R 2 Adj-R t- P- C (p N, p T ) t, (p N, p T ) t, (a T, a N ) t (a T, a N ) t, (g, y) t (g, y) t, cca t cca t, fdi t fdi t, AR(1)-AR(4):LM P R 2 Adj-R
35 9: () t- P- C (p N, p T ) t, (p N, p T ) t, (p N, p T ) t, (a T, a N ) t (a T, a N ) t, (g, y) t cca t cca t, fdi t AR(1)-AR(4):LM P R 2 and Adj-R t- P- C (p N, p T ) t, (p N, p T ) t, (p N, p T ) t, (a T, a N ) t (a T, a N ) t, (a T, a N ) t, (a T, a N ) t, (g, y) t cca t cca t, fdi t AR(1)-AR(4):LM P R 2 Adj-R : 1. : ADL(). 2. AR(1)-AR(4):LM : Breusch-Godfrey. 3. : (p N, p T ): 4. : (a T, a N ), GDP (g, y), GDP (cca), () GDP (fdi). 34
36 10: 9 () a T, a N g, y cca fdi (0.143) (0.162) (0.700) (0.882) (1.827) (0.189) (11.147) (7.282) (19.976) (20.140) (0.194) (0.140) (0.189) (0.064) (0.464) (0.099) (0.318) (0.858) (1.825) (4.842) (0.144) (0.140) (0.168) (0.210) (12.423) (0.288) (0.076) (0.169) (0.324) (0.145) (0.528) (11.747) (5.243) (15.618) (16.692) LR H 0 : p- 2 (6) = (0.000) : : PMGE( ). 3. : (p N, p T ). 4. : (a T, a N ), GDP (g, y), GDP (cca), ()(fdi). 35
37
38 q=s+p*-p
39
40
41
42 y = x R2 = y = x R2 = y = x R2 =
43
44
45
46 ()
47
48 ()
産業・企業レベルデータで見た日本の経済成長.pdf
2003 11 10 IT IT JIP JCER ) 2003 CD-ROM http://www.esri.go.jp/jp/archive/bun/bun170/170index. html 1 JIP Jorgenson, Mun, andstiroh (2002) GDP 2 3 1951 1954 1957 1960 1963 1966 1969 1972 1975 1978 1981
More information遺産相続、学歴及び退職金の決定要因に関する実証分析 『家族関係、就労、退職金及び教育・資産の世代間移転に関する世帯アンケート調査』
2-1. (2-1 ) (2-2 ) (2-3 ) (Hayashi [1986]Dekle [1989]Barthold and Ito [1992] [1996]Campbell [1997] [1998]Shimono and Ishikawa [2002]Shimono and Otsuki [2006] [2008]Horioka [2009]) 1 2-1-1 2-1-1-1 8 (1.
More informationMicrosoft Word - Šv”|“Å‘I.DOC
90 ª ª * E-mailshinobu.nakagawa@boj.or.jp i ii iii iv SNA 1 70 80 2 80 90 80 80 90 1 80 90 98 6 1 1 SNA 2 1 SNA 80 1SNA 1 19931998 1 2-190 1,2 2 2-2 2-3,4 3 2-5 4 2030 2-3 3 2-15 97 20 90 2-15 9198 1.
More informationLA-VAR Toda- Yamamoto(1995) VAR (Lag Augmented vector autoregressive model LA-VAR ) 2 2 Nordhaus(1975) 3 1 (D2)
LA-VAR 1 1 1973 4 2000 4 Toda- Yamamoto(1995) VAR (Lag Augmented vector autoregressive model LA-VAR ) 2 2 Nordhaus(1975) 3 1 (D2) E-mail b1215@yamaguchi-u.ac.jp 2 Toda, Hiro Y. and Yamamoto,T.(1995) 3
More information高齢化とマクロ投資比率―国際パネルデータを用いた分析―
196 2017 * ** ** ** ** 160 2 2 JEL Classification Codes E21, E22, J11 Keywords * ESRI 28 ESRI 29 3 17 ESRI ** 115 196 Population Aging and Domestic Investment An Analysis Using International Panel Data
More information日本における財政政策のインパクトー1990年代のイベント・スタディー
FTPL FTPL sustainability FTPL fiscal theory of the price level FTPL Fukuda and Teruyama Giavazzi and Pagan Giavazzi and Pagano Alesina and PerottiSutherlandPerottiGiavazzi, Jappelli and Pagano FTPL LeeperSimsWoodford
More information国際流動性に関する財政的側面について
IMF SDR IMF 2011 6 1 2 2011 E-mail: obstfeld@econ.berkeley.edu / /2011.10 35 1. 2007 2009 2 Goodhart [1999] 2010 11 2. 4 1970 IMF 1960 36 /2011.10 international reserve 1 D 35 1 D 35 1960 Eichengreen [2011]
More informationGDPギャップと潜在成長率
2003 output gap 80 1 20 90 20 70 2 1 2 output gap potential output 1 2 (2001) 3 potential rate of growth 2000 Meyer (2000) European Central Bank: (1999b) 2002 10 4 3 (2000) 4 4 () 5 5 5 6 () () 7 Total
More information[17]Holmström and Tirole (2000) (1) (2) (1) (2) 1 1 2
2002 4 1 1990 1 525-8577 1-1-1. Tel.: 077-561-4855. Fax.: 077-561-3964. E-mail: khori@ec.ritsumei.ac.jp 1 [17]Holmström and Tirole (2000) (1) (2) (1) (2) 1 1 2 MM MM MM MM CP 0 3 1 1990 1970 2 2 1 1 17%
More informationSNAと家計調査における貯蓄率の乖離-日本の貯蓄率低下の要因-
RIETI Discussion Paper Series 10-J-003 RIETI Discussion Paper Series 10-J-003 2009 年 12 月 SNA と家計調査における貯蓄率の乖離 - 日本の貯蓄率低下の要因 - 宇南山卓 ( 神戸大学大学院経済学研究科 ) 要 旨 SNA と家計調査から計算される家計貯蓄率の乖離の原因を明らかにし 日本の貯蓄率の低下の原因を考察した
More informationボーナス制度と家計貯蓄率-サーベイ・データによる再検証-
ESRI Discussion Paper Series No.139 by May 2005 Economic and Social Research Instute Cabinet Office Tokyo, Japan * 400 : JEL classification: D12, E21 * 186-8603 2-1 042-580-8369 FAX 042-580-8333 1 Abstract
More information財政赤字の経済分析:中長期的視点からの考察
1998 1999 1998 1999 10 10 1999 30 (1982, 1996) (1997) (1977) (1990) (1996) (1997) (1996) Ihori, Doi, and Kondo (1999) (1982) (1984) (1987) (1993) (1997) (1998) CAPM 1980 (time inconsistency) Persson, Persson
More informationデフレ不況下の金融政策をめぐる政治過程
1991 2003 GDP....................................... http://www.stat.go.jp/ http://www.boj.or.jp/ GDP http://www.esri.cao.go.jp/ GDP - - - inflation targeting Krugman a IS-LM liquidity trap Krugman b Krugman
More information表紙_目次.PDF
JIL 2 1980 vol.3 15 3 1 3 15 18 IT 26 28 33 20 OECD 80 90 (1998) (2000) 2 Aghion et al. (1999) OECD 1970 1 2 70 1980 90 1.1 Kuznets U inverted U-shaped hypothesis GNP U 1 18901940 6 3 Kuznets(1955) (1963)
More information物価変動の決定要因について ― 需給ギャップと物価変動の関係の国際比較を中心に―
NAIRU NAIRU NAIRU GDPGDP NAIRUNon- Accelerating Inflation Rate of Unemployment GDP GDP NAIRU Lown and RichFisher, Mahadeva and Whitley raw materials G NAIRUTurnerFai WatanabeNAIRU Watanabe nested NAIRU
More information都道府県別パネル・データを用いた均衡地価の分析: パネル共和分の応用
No.04-J-7 4 3 * yumi.saita@boj.or.jp ** towa.tachibana@boj.or.jp *** **** toshitaka.sekine@boj.or.jp 103-8660 30 * ** *** London School of Economics **** : Λ y z x 4 3 / 1 (panel cointegration) Meese and
More information財政のサステナビリティと長期金利の動向
* nakaza-t@hoffman.cc.sophia.ac.jp ** yutaka.soejima@boj.or.jp ()*** **** munehisa.kasuya@boj.or.jp No.03-J-7 2003 10 103-8660 30 * **()******* * ** () *** **** 2003 10 (i) (ii) Keywords: government bonds,
More information,.,,.,. NIRA,.,.,,, GDP.,., 1%, 2.0% 3).,,.,,., 1, 4).,,.,, GDP,.,,.,,,.,,., 2002.,,., 3), Q&A Q16 (http://www.stat.go.jp/data/kakei/qa-1.ht
1, 1, 2011 4 3-28,,.,,.,.,,.,,.,,.,.,. 1., 1), 1946.,, GDP,.,,,.,,., (2008) ( NIRA ), 23,.,,, 2).,,,.,,.,,., 657-8501 2-1, E-mail: unayama@person.kobe-u.ac.jp 1) 1. 2), 1990 2 21, 1993 6 12. 3 1 1 2011
More informationMasahiro NAKANO Keynes benchmark Keynes 89
89 102 Masahiro NAKANO Keynes benchmark Keynes 89 ( )IS LM Keynes Hicks IS LM Phillips stylized fact ( ) ( ) 90 Keynes 3 superneutrality 4 RBC 2 1 (i) (ii) (a) (b) (c) 3 Keynes 91 Walras Keynes Say s law
More informationY-...W
259 21 1 1 2003 2 1 2 1 15 22 260 56 3 2 2. 1 2. 2 2. 3 2. 4 3 3. 1 3. 2 4 2 2. 1 1965 1999 2 Brick, Frierman, and Kim 1998 Choate 1997Fischer, Heinkel, and Zechner 1989 Gilson 1997 Mauer and Triantis
More informationTitle 日本の輸入財市場における PTM の検証 Author(s) 新開, 潤一 Citation 大阪大学経済学. 57(1) P.60-P.73 Issue Date Text Version publisher URL
Title 日本の輸入財市場における PTM の検証 Author(s) 新開, 潤一 Citation 大阪大学経済学. 57(1) P.60-P.73 Issue Date 2007-06 Text Version publisher URL https://doi.org/10.18910/16614 DOI 10.18910/16614 rights Vol.57 No.1 June 2007
More informationアジアの資本移動の変化に関するクラスター分析 アジア域内の証券投資活性化に向けて
* ** 199 1 1996-97 relation * ** Seoul conference China and Emerging Asia: Reorganizing the Global Economy? held by KIEP and Seoul National University 26 5 11-12 Hugh Patrick Yung-Chul Park 26 9 9-1 East
More informationIshi
Ishi HPhttp: // www.mof.go.jp / jouhou / syuzei / siryou /.htm.. or ERTA, TRA ERTA Economic Recovery Tax Act TRA Tax Reform Act Mroz Triest Lindsey Burtless Navrati Lindsey Burtless Navrati CPS Current
More information5 I The Current Situation and Future Prospects of the North Korean Economy presented at the 2014 Korea Dialogue Conference on Strengthenin
5 I. 3 1 1990 2 The Current Situation and Future Prospects of the North Korean Economy presented at the 2014 Korea Dialogue Conference on Strengthening North Pacific Cooperation organized by the East-West
More information1 1 1 [2000]
* 2000 7 26 1 1 1 [2000] 1 2 1 2 2 1 B to C 250000 億円 200000 日本米国 213,200 150000 100000 50000 0 153,600 106,900 71,100 66,620 42,700 43,860 22,500 26,940 15,340 645 3,360 7,730 1998 年 1999 年 2000 年 2001
More information<96D889BA904D2E696E6464>
615 379 1 1995 10 OECD 1995 380 616 57 3 1993 4 3071 2003 1 3247 10 10 4 1 1990 2000 2003 10 617 381 2002 2 3 4 5 2 1 1990 1995 1995 12 1995 IPP Independent Power Producer 1 2004a, b 2005a, b 382 618 57
More informationWinter 図 1 図 OECD OECD OECD OECD 2003
266 Vol. 44 No. 3 I 序論 Mirrlees 1971 Diamond 1998 Saez 2002 Kaplow 2008 1 700 900 1, 300 1, 700 II III IV V II わが国の再分配の状況と国際比較 OECD Forster and Mira d Ercole 2005 2006 2001 Winter 08 267 図 1 図 2 2000 2
More information02.„o“φiflì„㙃fic†j
X-12-ARIMA Band-PassDECOMP HP X-12-ARIMADECOMP HPBeveridge and Nelson DECOMP X-12-ARIMA Band-PassHodrick and PrescottHP DECOMPBeveridge and Nelson M CD X ARIMA DECOMP HP Band-PassDECOMP Kiyotaki and Moore
More information1 Nelson-Siegel Nelson and Siegel(1987) 3 Nelson-Siegel 3 Nelson-Siegel 2 3 Nelson-Siegel 2 Nelson-Siegel Litterman and Scheinkman(199
Nelson-Siegel Nelson-Siegel 1992 2007 15 1 Nelson and Siegel(1987) 2 FF VAR 1996 FF B) 1 Nelson-Siegel 15 90 1 Nelson and Siegel(1987) 3 Nelson-Siegel 3 Nelson-Siegel 2 3 Nelson-Siegel 2 Nelson-Siegel
More informationOECD INVEST JAPAN jp/ij/index.htm
Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org) Title OECD 諸国における経営資源の収益率の推計 Sub Title Rates of return on managerial resources : the case of OECD countries Author 遠藤, 正寛 (Endoh, Masahiro) Publisher 慶應義塾大学出版会 Publication
More information1990年代以降の日本の経済変動
1990 * kenichi.sakura@boj.or.jp ** hitoshi.sasaki@boj.or.jp *** masahiro.higo@boj.or.jp No.05-J-10 2005 12 103-8660 30 * ** *** 1990 2005 12 1990 1990 1990 2005 11 2425 BIS E-mail: kenichi.sakura@boj.or.jp
More information2) 3) 2) Ohkusa, 1996 ; 1999 ; Ohtake and Ohkusa, 1994 ; La Croix and A. Kawamura, Reject American Economic Review, Journal of Political Econom
1) IOC Major League Baseball s MLB Blue Ribbon Panel Levin et al. 1) Yamamura and Shin, 2005 a ; 2005 b ; 2005 c communication 2) 3) 2) Ohkusa, 1996 ; 1999 ; Ohtake and Ohkusa, 1994 ; La Croix and A. Kawamura,
More informationOn model selection problems in terms of prediction mean squared error and interpretaion of AIC (slides)
Applications in Econometrics and Finance by Long Memory Processes 2007 11 6 13:30-16:10 Table of Contents PART1 PART2 PART3 PART1 1 {y t } ρ(h) = ( h ) = Cov[y t y t+h ]/ Var[y t ] (yt y)(y t+h y) ρ(h)
More information2015 : (heterogenous) Heterogeneous homogeneous Heterogenous agent model Bewley 1 (The Overlapping-Generations Models:OLG) OLG OLG Allais (1
2015 : 27 6 13 1 (heterogenous) Heterogeneous homogeneous Heterogenous agent model Bewley 1 (The Overlapping-Generations Models:OLG) OLG OLG Allais (1947) 2 Samuelson(1958) 3 OLG Solow Ramsey Samuelson
More informationz.prn(Gray)
1. 90 2 1 1 2 Friedman[1983] Friedman ( ) Dockner[1992] closed-loop Theorem 2 Theorem 4 Dockner ( ) 31 40 2010 Kinoshita, Suzuki and Kaiser [2002] () 1) 2) () VAR 32 () Mueller[1986], Mueller ed. [1990]
More informationIMES DISCUSSION PAPER SERIES Discussion Paper No. 99-J-17 INSTITUTE FOR MONETARY AND ECONOMIC STUDIES BANK OF JAPAN 100-8630 203 IMES Discussion Paper Series 99-J-17 1999 6 * JEL classification E52 E58
More informationAssociation of South East Asian Nations: ASEAN ASEAN ASEAN ASEAN ASEAN ASEAN ASEAN
Association of South East Asian Nations: ASEAN ASEAN ASEAN ASEAN ASEAN ASEAN ASEAN ASEAN ASEAN ASEAN ASEAN ASEAN ASEAN ASEAN Free Trade Agreement: FTA FTA ASEAN ASEAN ASEAN ASEAN The European Union: EU
More informationオーストラリア研究紀要 36号(P)☆/3.橋本
36 p.9 202010 Tourism Demand and the per capita GDP : Evidence from Australia Keiji Hashimoto Otemon Gakuin University Abstract Using Australian quarterly data1981: 2 2009: 4some time-series econometrics
More information, Exchange & Finamce
10 35 50 10 20 1210 18 15 15, 7.5 10 13 50 10 10 10 10 10 10 1225 7.5 10 1.3 10 6.8 5.5 142 25 Exchange & Finamce 1210 10 2.75 2.5 2.5 1210 10 12 1.5 10 10 1.7 1.5 1.5 1.2 1.5 1.5 10 1.4 1.3 1.3 10 12,900
More information日本の商品先物市場の効率性
....2.. 1988 21 1 (Efficient Market H ypothesis:emh 1999 Divisia Index 1) 15 2) 1985 1 1995 12 2 1997 3) 1985 6 1986 11 1991 1 1993 1 0 1011 1990 100 4) 10 11 12 13 20 40 14 15 3 91.40076 176.46088 99.87063
More information日本は今なお熟練労働集約的な財を純輸出しているか?
日 本 銀 行 ワーキングペーパーシリーズ 日 本 は 今 なお 熟 練 労 働 集 約 的 な 財 を 純 輸 出 しているか? 清 田 耕 造 * kiyota@sanken.keio.ac.jp No.14-J-1 2014 年 1 月 日 本 銀 行 103-8660 日 本 郵 便 ( 株 ) 日 本 橋 郵 便 局 私 書 箱 30 号 * 慶 應 義 塾 大 学 産 業 研 究 所 日
More information46−ª3�=4�“ƒ‚S“·‚Ö‡¦
463420101 1. 1989, Yoshida and Rasche1990, Rasche1990, 19921997, Fujiki and Mulligan1996, 1996, Sekine1998, 2001, Fujiki2002, 2003, 2004 Bahmani-Oskooee and Shabsigh1996, Amano and Wirjanto2000, Bahmani-Oskooee
More information自殺の経済社会的要因に関する調査研究報告書
17 1 2 3 4 5 11 16 30,247 17 18 21,024 +2.0 6 12 13 WHO 100 14 7 15 2 5 8 16 9 10 17 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 II I 18 Durkheim(1897) Hamermesh&Soss(1974)Dixit&Pindyck(1994) Becker&Posner(2004) Rosenthal(1993)
More information日本の高齢者世帯の貯蓄行動に関する実証分析
196 2017 * ** ** 1 2 3 JEL Classification Codes D14, D15, E21 Keywords * 28 Hyun- Hoon Lee Robert Owen Kwanho Shin ** 29 196 An Empirical Analysis of the Saving Behavior of Elderly Households in Japan
More informationAbstract IFS IFS 135
Abstract IFS IFS 135 International Financial Statistics Exchange Arrangements and Exchange Restrictions 136 137 International Financial 138 Exchange Arrangements and Exchange Restrictions International
More information2 / 24
2017 11 9 1 / 24 2 / 24 Solow, 1957 total factor productivity; TFP 5% 経済成長率の要因分解 4% 3% 2.68% 2.51% 2% 1% 0% 1.63% 1.50% 0.34% 0.42% 0.55% 0.97% 1.14% 0.86% 0.13% -0.59% -0.59% -0.09% 0.01% -1% 1970-80
More informationAttendance Demand for J-League õ Shinsuke KAWAI* and Takeo HIRATA* Abstract The purpose of this study was to clarify the variables determining the attendance in J-league matches, using the 2,699 J-league
More informationp *2 DSGEDynamic Stochastic General Equilibrium New Keynesian *2 2
2013 1 nabe@ier.hit-u.ac.jp 2013 4 11 Jorgenson Tobin q : Hayashi s Theorem : Jordan : 1 investment 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 *1 *1 93SNA 1 p.180 1936 100 1970 *2 DSGEDynamic Stochastic General Equilibrium New Keynesian
More information082_rev2_utf8.pdf
3 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 1 3 3 3 2008 3 2008 2008 3 2008 2008, 1 5 Lo and MacKinlay (1990a) de Jong and Nijman (1997) Cohen et al. (1983) Lo and MacKinlay (1990a b) Cohen et al. (1983) de Jong and Nijman (1997)
More information........,.,.,..,.,.,.,.,.,.,.,., International Capital Market Litan et al a b c d M&A a a b E- e- Litan et al. : Table Levine World Bank Levine Greenwald et al. B R F R r R R r B R r B R r B R R Stiglitz
More informationわが国企業による資金調達方法の選択問題
* takeshi.shimatani@boj.or.jp ** kawai@ml.me.titech.ac.jp *** naohiko.baba@boj.or.jp No.05-J-3 2005 3 103-8660 30 No.05-J-3 2005 3 1990 * E-mailtakeshi.shimatani@boj.or.jp ** E-mailkawai@ml.me.titech.ac.jp
More information<966B8DE2905E88EA2E696E6464>
477 241 1 1 3 C 2 13630033 1 Musgrave 1959 242 478 57 3 2 2 1 FTPL fiscal theory of the price level 479 243 90 FTPL FTPL 1 1 244 480 57 3 2 3 GDP GDP 2 2 90 3 2 4 4 5 481 245 2 90 90 GDP 90 2 2 3 4 3 1
More information_16_.indd
well-being well-being well-being Cantril Ladder well-being well-being Cantril Self-Anchoring Striving Scale Cantril Ladder Ladder Ladder awellbeing well-being well-being Gallup World Poll World Database
More information国際学研究 2‐1☆/目次(2‐1)
Economic Development and Structural Changes : A Look through Productivity and Wages Akira Kohsaka Abstract : This paper examines the dynamisms of structural changes in the process of economic development
More information, 3, 1999, 4,,
1, 1992 2005,,, 10 2,, 1992 1998 1,,, 1998 2002 2,, 3,,, 2002, 2002 3 1 2 1 , 3, 1999, 4,, 3 14 11 2 I, 10,, 1992 2005, 2,, 3, 4,, II,, 1992 1998 1,, 1998 2002 2 2002 3 II-1: 1 1993 1998 90,, 1995 6850,,
More information【表紙】経済学論叢_18号/表1・3・背
Blanchard Solow Solow Galor and Tsiddon ,, , ,, ,,,,,, a if b c if if CES CES,,,,,,. Bowles Ciccone and Peri, .,, Bowles Hamermesh Antras Ciccone and Peri CES CES Krusell et al. Duffy et al. Hornstein
More informationC. R. McKenzie 2003 3 2004 ( 38 ) 2 2004 2005 (Keio Household Panel Survey) control group treatment group 1
KEIO UNIVERSITY MARKET QUALITY RESEARCH PROJECT (A 21 st Century Center of Excellence Project) DP2005-020 * C. R. McKenzie** 2003 3 2004 ( 38 ) 2 2004 2005 (Keio Household Panel Survey) control group treatment
More informationbottleneckjapanese.dvi
1 M&A Keywords:,. Address: 742-1, Higashinakano, Hachioji-shi, Tokyo 192-09,Japan fax:+81 426 74 425 E-mail: yangc@tamacc.chuo-u.ac.jp ; yasuokaw@tamacc.chuo-u.ac.jp 1 Yang and Kawashima(2008) 1 2 ( MVI
More informationTitle ベンチャー企業の研究開発支出の決定要因 日本と台湾の事例を中心に Author(s) 蘇, 顯揚 Citation 經濟論叢 (1996), 158(1): Issue Date URL Right
Title ベンチャー企業の研究開発支出の決定要因 日本と台湾の事例を中心に Author(s) 蘇, 顯揚 Citation 經濟論叢 (1996), 158(1): 54-76 Issue Date 1996-07 URL https://doi.org/10.14989/45083 Right Type Departmental Bulletin Paper Textversion publisher
More informationuntitled
2 book conference 1990 2003 14 Repeated Cross-Section Data 1 M1,M2 M1 Sekine(1998) Repeated Cross-Section Data 1 1. (1989), Yoshida and Rasche(1990), Rasche(1990), 19921997, Fujiki and Mulligan(1996),
More informationTitle 最適年金の理論 Author(s) 藤井, 隆雄 ; 林, 史明 ; 入谷, 純 ; 小黒, 一正 Citation Issue Date Type Technical Report Text Version publisher URL
Title 最適年金の理論 Author(s) 藤井, 隆雄 ; 林, 史明 ; 入谷, 純 ; 小黒, 一正 Citation Issue 2012-06 Date Type Technical Report Text Version publisher URL http://hdl.handle.net/10086/23085 Right Hitotsubashi University Repository
More informationワールド・ワイド 10‐2(P)/3.中尾
28 1 35 35 1 2003 35 2 3 4 29 1965 1998 35 1000 5 647 1960 6 35 7 8 2 30 10 2 2. 1 2. 2 2. 3 3 3. 1 3. 2 4 2 2 2. 1 9 1 2003 1 647 10 t π macro 1 1964 1998 31 t- π macro 7.21 0.12 t 31.3610.65 R 2 0.77
More information- March IMF IMF IMF ITO The General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade
M&A IMF IMF gold tranche - March IMF IMF IMF ITO The General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade IMF IMF IMF GATT OECD OECD BITs. - March. U I = I (r m, i, Z * r m i Z * (= Z / Z) I / r m > I / i < I / Z *
More information50-4 平井健之.pwd
GDP GNP Gupta 1967, Wagner and Weber 1977, Mann 1980, Abizadeh and Gray 1985, Ram 1987, Abizadeh and Yousefi 1988, Nagarajan and Spears 1990 GDP GNP GDP GNP GDP GNP Adolph Wagner Wagner 1967 Ram 1987,
More informationuntitled
Barro Regression Does social capital improve regional economic growth? - Investigation using prefectural cross-sectional data in Japan - Abstract The purpose of this research is to empirically examine
More informationアジ研教科書「マクロ安定化」.PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Corbo, V., and S. Fischer, Structural Adjustment, Stabilization and Policy Reform: Domestic and International Finance, in J. Behrman and T. N. Srinivasan, eds., Handbook of Development
More information山形大学紀要
x t IID t = b b x t t x t t = b t- AR ARMA IID AR ARMAMA TAR ARCHGARCH TARThreshold Auto Regressive Model TARTongTongLim y y X t y Self Exciting Threshold Auto Regressive, SETAR SETARTAR TsayGewekeTerui
More information( β K ) p β W W p β K K aβ β W W β β K K ) 1/(βW +β K ) 3 ln C =lnα + 1 β W + β K ln Q (3) 1/(β W + β K ) ( β W + β K ) 4 ( ) ( ) (1998 2 1 3 ) ( 1998
3 1 1993-1995 ( Cobb-Douglas ) (1998 2 3 ) ( ) 17 (1998 2 1 ) 1 Christensen, Jorgensonand Lau (1973) 1983 ( ) 2 W = K = β W,β K > 0 Q = aw βw K βk (1) C = αq 1/(βW +βk) (2) 10 ( (A) (A03) ) ( ) ( ) 1 2
More informationミクロ・データによる家計行動分析: 将来不安と予備的貯蓄
subjective measures E-mailkeiko.murata@mfs.cao.go.jp subjective subjective measures Dardanoni Leland waiting option Browning and LusardiEngen and Gruber Carroll and Samwick PSIDPanel Study of Income Dynamics
More informationuntitled
* 2001 (B) ** 113-0033 7-3-1 TEL(03)5841-5641FAX(03)5841-5521iwamoto@e.u-tokyo.ac.jp 1990 1990 1 2 3 1 (2002) 2 social infrastructure social capital Woolcook (1998) 3-1 - - 2 - 1990 Mera (1973) G Cobb-Douglas
More information税制改正にともなう家計の所得弾性値 : 高齢者パネルデータによる実証分析
Kwansei Gakuin University Rep Title Author(s) 税制改正にともなう家計の所得弾性値 : 高齢者パネルデータによる実証分析 Uemura, Toshiyuki, 上村, 敏之 ; Kitamura Takayuki, 金田, 陸幸 Citation 経済学論究, 69(4): 1-16 Issue Date 2016-3-20 URL http://hdl.handle.net/10236/14671
More information戦間期日本企業の資金調達、資本コスト、資本構成:最適資本構成理論からみた1930年代における企業財務
1930 Modigliani and Miller [1958] 170 1930 2008 7 16 I E-mail: takashi.nanjou@boj.or.jp E-mail: cc00881@srv.cc.hit-u.ac.jp //2009.7 81 1. 1 2 M&A 3 4 1965 1969 1995 1995 1993 1 2008 2008 1985 2006 10 ROA
More informationIMF http : // htm
1 2 1971 1973 1999 1997 2 IMF 1 1 2 3 1 4 1 2 5 6 1 2 7 IMF http : //www.imf.org/external/np/mfd/er/2006/eng/0706. htm 8 du jure de facto Reinhart Rogoff 20041946 2001 153 Levy-Yeyati Sturzenegger 20051974
More information公務員倫理問題への新アプローチ
OECD CPI CPI CPI CPI CPI CPI / GDP / / / /.............................. Transparency International Corruption Perception Index CPI CPI 30 25 20 15 10 5 0 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007
More information第2章 経済成長と所得分配: マレーシアの事例を中心に
2006 1970 1990 U 1 GDP GDP GDP 1970 1 1969 5 13 5 13 New Economic Policy: NEP NEP 2 NEP 1971 1990 National Development Policy: NDP 1991 2000 Vision Development Policy: VDP 2001 2010 NEP NEP 1990 1980 1
More information橡同居選択における所得の影響(DP原稿).PDF
** *** * 2000 13 ** *** (1) (2) (1986) - 1 - - 2 - (1986) Ohtake (1991) (1993) (1994) (1996) (1997) (1997) Hayashi (1997) (1999) 60 Ohtake (1991) 86 (1996) 89 (1997) 92 (1999) 95 (1993) 86 89 74 79 (1986)
More informationTomorrow Next th draft version MEW SWET
Research Center for Price Dynamics A Research Project Concerning Prices and Household Behaviors Based on Micro Transaction Data Working Paper Series No.7 Tomorrow Next を用いた金融政策の分析 青野幸平 June 14, 2012 4th
More information物価指数の計測誤差と品質調整手法:わが国CPIからの教訓
CPICPI CPI CPI CPI CPI Economic Perspective Shiratsukaa Consumer Price IndexCPI CPI CPI CPI CPI Advisory Commission to Study the Consumer Price Index 1996Shiratsuka 1999bHoffmann 1998Cunningham 1996 Crawford
More information開発金融増刊号
4 6 Y = f (, E, Y E ( Y E = α ( E α we py α 0 β E ( ( E β ( E β 6 ( = ( α β ( E β 8 i Y i f i, E i, i 9 Y = α α ( α E α S E 0 ( β β E β E( β E β β6 ( we Y = = = α β E py E β ( β Y Y B Y A r / pr p Y
More informationuntitled
Trade and Trade Finance in the 200809 Financial Crisis, IMF Working Paper WP/11/16., Understanding the Great Trade Collapse of 200809 and the Subsequent Trade Recovery, Economic Perspectives, 2Q/2011.
More information野村資本市場研究所|アジアの金融競争力(PDF)
2013 Spring 1. GDP 3 26% 2. 3. 4. GDP 1 GDP 2000 25.4% 2012 10 IMF 1 GDP 28.7%GDP 10.7% 20.3% 2000 2012 10 2 3 2000 2012 4.2 5.4 2 2000 14% 2012 26% GDP 2012 30 10 32003 11 2013 Spring 100% 2 90% 80% 70%
More informationfiúŁÄ”s‘ê‡ÌŁª”U…−…X…N…v…„…~…A…•‡Ì ”s‘ê™´›ß…−…^†[…fiŠ‚ª›Âfl’«
2016/3/11 Realized Volatility RV 1 RV 1 Implied Volatility IV Volatility Risk Premium VRP 1 (Fama and French(1988) Campbell and Shiller(1988)) (Hodrick(1992)) (Lettau and Ludvigson (2001)) VRP (Bollerslev
More information日本の世帯属性別貯蓄率の動向について:アップデートと考察
RIETI Discussion Paper Series 18-J-024 RIETI Discussion Paper Series 18-J-024 2018 年 8 日本の世帯属性別貯蓄率の動向について : アップデートと考察 1 宇南 卓 ( 経済産業研究所 ) 野太郎 ( 信州 学 ) 要 旨 全国消費実態調査 家計調査 家計消費状況調査を補完的に利用することでマクロ統計と整合的な貯蓄率のデータを構築した宇南山
More information60 Vol. 44 No. 1 2 準市場 化の制度的枠組み: 英国 教育改革法 1988 の例 Education Reform Act a School Performance Tables LEA 4 LEA LEA 3
Summer 08 59 I はじめに quasi market II III IV V 1 II 教育サービスにおける 準市場 1 教育サービスにおける 準市場 の意義 Education Reform Act 1988 1980 Local Education Authorities LEA Le Grand 1991 Glennerster 1991 3 1 2 3 2 60 Vol. 44
More informationカルマンフィルターによるベータ推定( )
β TOPIX 1 22 β β smoothness priors (the Capital Asset Pricing Model, CAPM) CAPM 1 β β β β smoothness priors :,,. E-mail: koiti@ism.ac.jp., 104 1 TOPIX β Z i = β i Z m + α i (1) Z i Z m α i α i β i (the
More informationOSIPP41_p1_2.eps
2007 年 冬 号 No.41 1 2 3 4 Peace Culture Review of Economic Design Journal of Labor Economics Hitotsubashi Journal of Economics Japan and the World Economy Daily Yomiuri Working Paper Series, Center for
More informationHi-Stat Discussion Paper Series No.248 東京圏における 1990 年代以降の住み替え行動 住宅需要実態調査 を用いた Mixed Logit 分析 小林庸平行武憲史 March 2008 Hitotsubashi University Research Unit
Hi-Stat Discussion Paper Series No.248 東京圏における 1990 年代以降の住み替え行動 住宅需要実態調査 を用いた Logit 分析 小林庸平行武憲史 March 2008 Hitotsubashi University Research Unit for Statistical Analysis in Social Sciences A 21st-Century
More informationVisit Japan Campaign OD OD 18 UNWTO 19 OD JNTO ODUNWTO 1 1
UNWTO OD 2 FURUYA, Hideki 1 LCC 1 2 OD 1 2 OD 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 /1 GDP M. H. Mohd Hanafiah and M. F. Mohd Harun 12 GDP 1 13 Vol.15 No.4 2013 Winter 041 3 3.1 6222011 Visit Japan Campaign2003521 10119
More information個人消費支出からみた戦間期の景気変動:LTES個人消費支出の再推計
LTES LTES LTES 1 GNE GDP GDP 1920 LTES GDP LTES 1931 GDP 76 Hi-Stat E-mail: kiyohito.utsunomiya@boj.or.jp / /2009.3 73 1. Long-Term Economic Statistics LTES 1 1971 LTES 2 LTES LTES System of National Accounts
More information<93638CB48FBA8E6C2E696E6464>
265 29 1 1. 1 19 5 6 4 2 ) 48 21 63 16 51 17 64 10 49 12 67 10 42 15 49 13 49 13 48 13 54.7 59.3 56.7 57.5 65.3 85.1 59.9 63.4 64.0 64.6 45.3 40.7 43.3 42.5 34.7 14.9 40.1 36.6 36.0 35.4 1854 1938 1854
More information和RIMNo.22高安氏.indd
NIEsGDP 1990 200436.1 22.365.1 80 GDP 4 RIM 2006 Vol.6 No.22 RIM 2006 Vol.6 No.22 5 NIEs GDP GDP GDP GDP 90 GDP 1951 80 81 90 90 90 2001 2003 GDP 80 90 2001 2002 GDP 87GDP 80 GDP GDP 6 RIM 2006 Vol.6 No.22
More information(1) (Karlan, 2004) (1) (1973) (1978) (1991) (1991) 1
2004 1 8 2005 12 17 1 (1) (Karlan, 2004) 2 3 4 5 E-mail: aa37065@mail.ecc.u-tokyo.ac.jp (1) (1973) (1978) (1991) (1991) 1 2 2 2.1 (, 1978, 7 ) (2) (1988) 38 2 (3) (4) (2) (1986) 91 (1996) 2 1 (1993) 1
More informationJSPS Grants-in-Aid for Creative Scientific Research Understanding Inflation Dynamics of the Japanese Economy Working Paper Series No.7 日本家計の消費 貯蓄 労働プロ
Title 日本家計の消費 貯蓄 労働プロファイル Author(s) 阿部, 修人 ; 稲倉, 典子 Citation Issue 2007-02-14 Date Type Technical Report Text Version publisher URL http://hdl.handle.net/10086/13627 Right Hitotsubashi University Repository
More informationKobe University Repository : Kernel タイトル Title 著者 Author(s) 掲載誌 巻号 ページ Citation 刊行日 Issue date 資源タイプ Resource Type 版区分 Resource Version 権利 Rights DOI
Kobe University Repository : Kernel タイトル Title 著者 Author(s) 掲載誌 巻号 ページ Citation 刊行日 Issue date 資源タイプ Resource Type 版区分 Resource Version 権利 Rights DOI 成人寿命の増加と国民貯蓄率に関する実証研究 (An Empirical Analysis on Increase
More information商学 63‐3☆/6.山本
193 W. A. 1 2 3 1 2 WTO FTA TPP D. P. P. W. A. 194 2 3 Lewis 1954 1982, 1987 1999 1 1 2 2 2 1 2 A B 1987 119 1985 Krugman and Obstfeld 2009 19742006 3 W. A. 195 2 1 2 1 1 1 2 1 A a1 a2 * * i ai i 1, 2
More information平成12年度 対日直接投資増加の理由と日本経済にもたらす影響に関する調査 第2章 対日投資と多国籍企業の戦略について
OLI 2-1. 2-1-1. 10% 2-1-2. 20 Hymer 1960 1 2 2 1 Vernon 1966 Smith 1987 Jacquemin 1985 21 Buckley & Casson 1976 Teece 1977 arm s-length internalize 2-1-3. OLI 40 OLI Dunning 1979 2 OLI 3 O: Ownership specific
More information復活だぁっ! 日本の不況と流動性トラップの逆襲
It s Baaack! Japan s Slump and the Return of the Liquidity Trap 1998 2001 8 29-9 9 Ver.1.0.1 1 2 2 5 2.1..................................... 5 2.2......................... 6 2.3.........................
More information橡表紙参照.PDF
CIRJE-J-58 X-12-ARIMA 2000 : 2001 6 How to use X-12-ARIMA2000 when you must: A Case Study of Hojinkigyo-Tokei Naoto Kunitomo Faculty of Economics, The University of Tokyo Abstract: We illustrate how to
More information導入
CIRJE-J-120 2004 10 CIRJE http://www.e.u-tokyo.ac.jp/cirje/research/03research02dp_j.html ** *** ** okazaki@e.u-tokyo.ac.jp *** masaki@econ.osaka-u.ac.jp - 1 - History of Production Organizations Abstract
More informationRIETI Highlight VOL.25
RIETI Highlight 2009 SUMMER 25 VOL. Research Digest RIETI 2009 SUMMER VOL. 25 Highlight 1 2 3 5 8 10 12 13 14 19 ResearchDigest 20 24 28 32 36 38 40 41 42 44 45 RIETI Topics 01 CONTENTS 02 RIETI Highlight
More information